Koornneef, 1997

download Koornneef, 1997

of 9

Transcript of Koornneef, 1997

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    1/9

    New Phytol.

    1997), 137,

    1-8

    Genetic approaches in plant physiology

    BY

    M. KO OR NN EE F* , C. AL ON SO - BL AN CO AND

    A. J. M. PEETERS

    Department ofGenetics, Wageningen Agricultural University, Dreijenlaan2 6703HA

    ageningen

    The Netherlands

    {Received3April 1997;accepted 24 June 1997

    SUMMARY

    The use ofgeneticsin plant biology aimsat thephysiologicalandmolecular genetical characterizationof the

    phenotypic

    variation for the trait under s tudy. Efficient mutant and gene isolation procedures have been developed

    for

    a

    number

    of

    plant models such

    asArabidopsis thaliana.

    For

    this,

    the map position

    of

    the genes and insertion

    mutagenesisare used. The latter also allows the characterization

    of

    genes that are not easily recognized in mutant

    approaches,by using enhancerorgene-trapping procedures and reverse genetics.Inaddition to mutants, natural

    variationpresent among wild and cultivated varieties ofa species provides an important source ofgenetic variation.

    The

    use of molecular markers, advanced mapping populations and specific cytogenetic stocks in case of polyploids,

    enablesa detailed characterization

    of

    such natural variation even when

    it

    is

    of

    a quantitative and polygenic nature.

    Examplesof the various genetic approachesare given.

    Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana, abscisic acid ABA), gene isolationandmutagenesis, photomorphogenesis,

    quantitative trait locus QTL).

    INTRODUCTION

    The use of genetics as a tool to dissect complex

    biological processesinplants hasalong history.For

    instance, a tobacco mutant called MarylandMam-

    moth and different soybean varieties led to the

    discover} of photoperiodism by Garner Allard

    1920). Late r, during the fifties, genetic dwarfs in

    peaandmaize convinced manyofthe importanceof

    gibberellins asplant growth hormones. Why there-

    after geneticshas notbeen used very muchinplant

    physiology is less clear, despite that mutants were

    shown to be crucial toolsfor theunderstandingof

    biosynthetic pathways inmicro-organisms and de-

    velopmental processes, e.g. inDrosophila. Towards

    the end of the seventies, students of

    E.

    coliand

    Drosophila

    genetics such asSomerville andMeyer-

    owitz became convinced that genetics was the wayto

    go ahead in plant science. These authors,aswellas

    Laibach, Redei and Feenstra before them, had

    realized that

    Arabidopsis thaliana

    L.) Heynh. wasa

    model speciesfor plant genetics, because this small

    self-fertilizing crucifer has avery short generation

    time. Genetics becomes even more powerful whenit

    can

    be

    combined with molecular genetics , which

    links DNAwith thephenotype. Its small genome

    and ease of transformat ion were additional factors.

    which established Arabidopsis as the general model

    organism

    in

    higher plant molecular genetics.

    Cur-

    rently, the whole genome of this plant is being

    sequenced Bevanetal.. 1997), and the impact of this

    information is rapidly increasingas can beseen,for

    example, from thefrequent use thatisalready made

    of the partly sequenced cDNAs called expressed

    sequence tags ESTs).

    Besides Arabidopsis, other plant species suchas

    petunia.

    Antirrhinum,

    maize, pea, tomato, barley and

    rice have been studied for a long time, resultingin

    large collectionsofgenetic stocksandgenetic maps.

    They became very interesting genetic models for

    specific developmental processes because of the

    particular characteristics of these species, whichled

    to the characterizationofsomeoftheir mutants.For

    instance, for

    Petunia

    and

    Antirrhinum,

    mutations

    affecting flower colour and morphology were

    analysed in detail. With the advent of molecular

    biology. Antirrhinum, maize and, somewhat later.

    Petunia could beused for gene cloning, since well

    characterized transposable elements were available.

    Unfortunately, these species, except Petunia, are

    difficult orimpossibleto transform, which limitsthe

    complementation proof

    of

    having cloned

    the

    gene

    and the further characterizat ion of those genes.

    Tomato and, even more so, rice, have relatively

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    2/9

    M. Koornneef C. Alonso-Blanco and A.J. M. Peeters

    resulting in the isolation of several disease-resistance

    genes (Jones Jones , 1997) . T he la rger genom es of

    barley and pea make these classic model species less

    amenabletosome molecular approach es . H owev er ,

    the va lue of these species sho uld not be u n d e r -

    estimated, given their suitability not only for genetics

    bu t a lso for plant physiology and plant biochem is try.

    In pea , thesystem of nitro gen fixation c ouldbe

    s tudied genet ica l ly, and wel l charac ter ized mutants ,

    e.g. inthe ph ytoc hrom e, f lowering and gibbere l l in

    pa thways , resul ted

    in

    excellent research, c om ple-

    m e n t a r ytotha tofthe 'g ene ra l ' m ode ls .Inbarley,

    s imilar approaches provided important molecular

    da ta on seed germinat ion, and the recent map-based

    cloning of the mildew resistance gene

    Mlo

    (Blischges

    etal 1997) indicates that these limitations, because

    of the large genome, canbeovercome . T hu s ,it is

    clear that genetics nowadaysis abasic toolinplant

    science. In orde r to apply this genet ic approach ,

    genetic variation, which takes

    a

    range

    of

    forms,

    is

    essential. Thegenera t ion of mu tant va r iat ion is

    genera l ly notapro blem because efficient mu tag ens

    and mutagenes is procedures are available . M ore

    difficult

    is

    the identification

    of

    m u t a n t p h e n o t y p e s

    tha t arerelevant to theresearch topic . Form o r -

    phological processes the phenot>^pe itself allows the

    detec t ion of mu tan ts ; however , for some biochem ica l

    and physiological traits , either thep h e n o t y p e is

    relatively subtle, or the phenotype is too general, e .g.

    genera l reduct ion of plan t size or vigour .An

    important l imita t ion infinding mu tan ts istha tfor

    many genes redundancy is present , which means tha t

    muta t ions in such genes do not resul t in an obvious

    vis ible phenotype s ince the redundant counterpar t

    produces enough produc t to atleast partly) su b-

    s t i tute for thefunction of themuta ted gene .In

    addi t ion

    to

    induced m utan ts , another sou rce

    of

    genet ic var ia t ion is provided by the na tura l var iants

    present withinaspecies andbycytog enetic stocks

    such as chromoso mal su bs t i tut io ns . Once genet ic

    variation has been identified and characterized, the

    appl ica t ion of molecular genet ic techn iques to amen -

    able species allows the cloning of the mutated genes.

    Cloning and charac ter iza t ion

    of

    genes have some -

    t imes given c lues about the na tureofthe observed

    defec ts in the mutants . An important recent example

    is the identification ofArabidopsis and tomato genes

    produc ing dwar f i sm when muta ted , in whichen-

    coded prote ins arerelated to steroid biosynthes is

    pro te ins in mam mals (L ie t

    al

    1996). This prom pted

    severa l authorstotes t t he effectof brass inos teroids

    on these dwarf mutants , ofwhich many couldbe

    rever ted to the phenotype of the wild type , whereas

    others were classified as insensitive to this group of

    c o m p o u n d s ( K a u s c h m a n n

    et

    al,\996 . Brass inos-

    te roid mutants have common charac ter is t ics , such as

    be ing dw arf with small round leaves and having a de-

    e t io la ted phen otype when grown in da rkness. T hese

    brass inos teroidsas na tura l p lan t hormones . On

    othe r hand ,

    it is

    very im po rtan t to find an effect

    the phenotypebygenes tha t h ave been c loned

    sequenced but forwhich nom u t a n t p h e n o t y p

    known, s ince such a phenoty pe provides key

    formation about the funct ion

    of

    those genes . N

    approaches such as reverse genetics are be

    developed to genera te mutants , s ta r t ing with a DN

    sequence of unknown funct ion.

    THE USE OF MUTANTS TO CLONE GENES AND

    THE USE OF GENES TO ISOLATE MUTANTS

    A number of procedures are now available to isol

    the cor re sponding DNA

    of

    genes only know n

    the i r mutant phenotype . Themos t impor tan t

    the se me thods are gene tagging and map-ba

    cloning.

    1. Gene tagging

    Inse r t ion of D N A in a coding sequence in m

    cases dis rupts the gene, resul t ing in a m u t

    phenotype . Since the sequence of the inser ted DN

    is known,

    it is

    possible

    to

    clone the genom ic pl

    DNA f lanking the inser t ion and thereby par t of t

    d i s rupted gene . In p lan t s , T-DNA and t r ansposab

    elements a re most f requent ly used fortagging.

    Arabidopsis, several large collections of T - D

    inser t ions have been genera ted (Fe ldmann, 199

    and, more recent ly, the int roduc t ion of ma

    transposa ble e lements such as the A c/ D s (Bancro

    et al.,1992 and the En/ I (Aa r t set al 1995) tw

    element systems have been used successfully.

    A specific application of tagging is the use

    enhance rorpro mo tor t raps (Sun daresan, 1996) .

    this system

    the

    T - D N A

    or

    transposab le e lem

    carriesareporter gene witho ut a promo tor or wit

    min imal prom otor . W hen such a constru c t is inser t

    near to a gene the express ion pa t te rn of the repor t

    gene might reflect theexpress ion pa t te rn of t

    endogenous gene , whose promotor

    or

    enhancer w

    used todrive the express ion ofthe rep or ter ge

    Because of r e d u n d a n c y , andalso beca use cert

    funct ions might not be essent ia l , such inser t ionsd

    not a lways resul t in physiologica l and morp hologic

    mutant phenotypes . Very sophis t ica ted sys temso

    this type , which inc lude gene t raps , have bee

    developed recent ly (Sundaresan

    et al

    1995) . Su

    trap l ines have been shown to bevery usefulf

    marking specific tissues (Scheres et al 1994)o

    processes . An important novel appl ica t ion of taggin

    is in reverse genetics (Koes etal 1995). Plants wi

    inser t ions in c loned genes , for which some sequen

    information

    is

    available,

    can be

    identified

    by t

    ability to amplify D N A fragm ents m polymer

    chain reac t ion (PCR). One PCR pr imer is based o

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    3/9

    Genetics in plant physiology

    sought. Again a mutant phenotype wil l not always be

    observed when therespective gene is disrupted ,

    becauseofredundancy .

    2. Map-based cloning

    Map-based c loning requi resadetailed genetic m ap -

    posit ion ofthe locus a nd the availability of easily

    screenable l ibrar ies harbour ing la rge p lant DNA

    fragments , e.g. in yeast and bac teria l artificial

    chrom osom es (YA Cs and BAC s) . Th e avai labi li ty of

    complete physical maps, where such clones have

    been grouped and sorted into contigs that are related

    to the genetic map are now available for most of the

    rabidopsis genome (Schmid t et al., 1995, Zachgo et

    al., 1996). This enormously facil i tates map-based

    loning since it rest r ic t s chrom osom e walkingto

    M ar t in ,

    1995). Final proof that theright gene hasbeen

    the

    complementa t ion

    of

    by D N A

    . O ther gene-cloning strategies based on mutants

    Ausubel ,

    is

    performed compa r ing wi ld type

    and

    et al.,1990).

    SE OF MUTANTS TO DISSECT TRAITS

    for

    of the m uta ted genes and pro-

    Clon ing of the corre spon ding genes has often

    provided impor tant ,

    and

    somet imes uniqu e ,

    in-

    formation on the mode of action of these genes and,

    fur thermore , it offers the possibility of modifying

    these processes,

    e.g. by

    reint roducing

    the

    cloned

    genes into plants, thereby over-expressing or under-

    expressing the genes.

    Three different pathways, namely those affecting

    abscisic acid (ABA), phytochrome and the transi t ion

    to fiowering can serve as illustrations for the genetic

    dissection of physiological pathways.

    1. Abscisic acid

    T he p lant ho rm one abscisic acid (ABA) affects man y

    processes in plants . Its role in contro lling seed

    dormancy

    and

    stomatal closure, toge ther with

    its

    germination and growth-inhibit ing effect ledtothe

    isolation ofm ut an ts affected inABA biosynthesis

    and action (Table 1) . The aba mutants , which are

    defective in epoxy -carotenoid levels and ABA

    provided conclusive proof for the carotenoid path-

    way of ABA biosyn thesis in higher plants (Du ckha m,

    Linfo rth Tay lor, 199 1; Rock Zeevaart , 1991).

    M ar inet al.(1996) cloned this gene using transp oson

    tagging. The ABA mutants showed the impor tance

    of ABA in stress resistance (reviewed by Giraudat et

    al., 1994). Three different genes of ABA-insensit ive

    {abi)mu tants have been c loned. ABIl (Leung et al.,

    1994; Meyer , Leube Grill, 1994) and ABI2

    (Leu ng, M erlot Gira uda t , 1997) were both shown

    to encode protein phosphatase 2Cs, which apparently

    play

    a

    role

    in

    ABA s ignal t ransduct ion . T he ABI3

    gene encodes a seed-specific transcription factor that

    t ransmi ts

    the

    ABA signal,

    as

    well

    as

    u n k n o w n

    developmental s ignals, to a number of seed-develop-

    ment-specif ic genes (Parcy Gira uda t , 1997). T he

    relevanceofABAinseed germ inationisshownby

    the lack of seed dormancy, characteristic of almost all

    ABA related mutants identif ied sofar. Recip rocal

    Loci involved in the biosynthesis or mode of action of ABA , and phenotype of the mutants at these loci

    Seed*

    dormancy

    Stomatal

    closure*

    ABA sensitivity

    growth inhibition*

    Gene function

    References

    BB

    -t

    t

    Zeaxanthin epoxydase

    Conversion of xanthoxin to ABA

    aldehyde

    Addition of sulphur to Moco of

    ABA aldehyde oxidase

    Protein phosphatase 2C

    Protein phosphatase 2C

    Seed-specific transcription factor

    Mar in et al. (1996)

    Schu^artz et al. (1997)

    Schwartz et al. (1997)

    Leung et al. (1994);

    Meyer et al. (1994)

    Leung et al. (1997)

    Giraudat et al. (1992)

    Finkelstein (1994)

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    4/9

    4

    M.

    Koornneef

    C. Alonso-Blanco and A.J. M. Peeters

    Table 2 Arabidops i s

    mutan ts affecting photorecep tive pigmen ts

    Sensitivity to *

    Gene

    Bf

    R

    F R

    Gene function

    References

    HYl

    HY2

    HY3 PHYB)

    HY4

    HY5

    PHYA +

    Heme oxygenase J

    synthase I

    Phytochrome B

    Cryptochrome

    Transcription factor

    Phytochrome A

    Parks Quail (1991); Ter ry

    (1997)

    Parks Quail (1991); Terry

    (1997)

    Reed

    et al.

    (1993)

    Ahmad Cashmore (1993)

    Oyama

    et al.

    (1996)

    Whitelam

    et al.

    (1993)

    * The sensitivity of mutants at these loci to light of specific wavelengths is less than ( ), slightly less than (+

    the same as

    (

    +

    )

    wild type.

    t B, Blue light; R, Red light; FR , Far Red light.

    X

    Heme oxygenase and phytochrom obilin synthase control the two last steps of phytochrom e chromo ph

    biosynthesis.

    c rosses revea led tha t ABA produced by the embryo

    controls germinat ion (Karssen

    et al.,

    1983) . Wi thout

    ABA, seeds do not require gibbere l l in (GA) for

    germinat ion as shown by the ir res is tance to the

    gibbere l l in biosynthes is inhibi tors te tcyc lac is and

    paclobutrazol (Leon-Kloosterz ie l

    et al., 1996a, b).

    In addi t ion, the insens i t ivi ty to such inhibi tors of

    seed germination led to the isolation of

    aba2

    and

    aba3

    mutants and to the isolation of mutants affected

    specifically in seed dormancy, which probably rep-

    resent genes tha t control one of the downstream

    processes affected by ABA.

    phytochrome-B-de f ic ien t

    hy3

    mutant sugges ted

    several authors that screening for insensitivity to F

    might yie ld phytochrome-A-def ic ient mutants ,

    indeed was la te r proven. Since

    phyA

    mu tants h

    no obvious phenotype in white light, this specif

    screen was required to f ind them. From the mome

    these well defined mutants were available they ha

    been used to specify the modes of action of the

    dif ferent phytochromes , e .g. in seed germinat i

    (Botto et al., 1995) , anthocy anin format

    (Kerckhoffs

    et al.,

    1997) and fiowering (Bagnall

    al.,

    1995).

    2.

    Photo receptive pigmen ts

    The control of growth and development by the

    qual i ty , qua nt i ty and dura t ion of l ight is descr ibed as

    photomorphogenes is . Plants perce ive information

    from l ight through pigment sys tems such as phyto-

    chrome and c ryptochrome . The complexi ty of the

    regula t ion of photomorphogenes i s by phytochrome

    comes from the fact that different types of phyto-

    chr om e enco ded by at least 45 different genes exist

    (Pra t t , 1995) . Th ese phy toch rom es differ in the ir

    photo-s tabi l i ty and the ir tempora l and develop-

    mental expression. For some processes these dif-

    fe rent types of phytochrome might have dif fe rent

    modes of ac t ion. Mutants a t the

    hyl-hy5

    loci, wh ich

    are defective in specific aspects of photomorpho-

    genes is and which are recognized by the ir e longated

    hypocotyls in white light, were first described by

    Koornneef, Rolff Sprui t (1980) . Subsequent ly , the

    molecular nature of all f ive mutants was elucidated

    (Table 2) . The ident i f ica t ion of the blue l ight

    receptor depended ful ly on the c loning of the

    HY4

    gene (Ahm ad Cash mo re , 1993) , and the sub -

    sequent charac ter iza t ion of the c loned gene (Lin

    et

    al.,

    1995) . The compar i son of the phytochrome

    3. Floral initiation

    The t rans i t ion f rom the vegeta t ive to the repr

    duct ive meris tem which produces f iowers , is poor

    unders tood a t the molecular leve l . To increase o

    unders tanding of this important process in high

    plants a genet ic approach has been sugges te

    Genet ic var ia t ion for this t ra i t i s abundant . F

    ins tance , dozens of mutants have been found

    Arabidopsis

    that either delay or advance the tr

    s i t ion to f lowering (Hau ghn , Schul tz M art ine

    Zapater , 1995

    ;

    Peete rs Ko orn neef 1996), as wel

    in other spec ies , but in none of these mutants h

    flowering been completely abolished. In contrast

    mutant s w i thout a r eproduc t ive phase , em f m u t a

    ( S u n g

    et al.,

    1992) lacking the vegetative phase h

    been isolated. The hypothesis that fiowering is t

    default state in

    A rabidopsis,

    which is repressed by

    E M F produ c t s , was then e s tab l i shed (Sung

    et a

    1992;

    M a r t i n e z - Z a p a t er et al., 1994; Weigel , 199

    The effect of these product(s) can be modified b

    var ious processes control led by the f lowering- t im

    genes and also by environmental factors such as lig

    and tempera ture . A number of the f lowering t im

    genes ,

    inc luding LD (Lee et al., 1994a ) , C

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    5/9

    Genetics in plant physiology

    {G Oand

    LD

    and a

    {FGA . Using

    a

    system with

    GO gene productisswitched on,a careful

    of

    the floral initiation proce ss

    in

    relat ion

    to

    by the develop men tal switch

    be performed (Simon, Igeno Coup land ,

    The

    fact tha t

    the

    genetics

    of the

    floral

    a comp lex regulat ion

    com-

    hard ly accessible for experim ental analysis .

    URAL GENETIC VARIATION

    ofa species prese nt in natu re contains

    at

    m any different g enes.

    In

    contras t

    onedoes not expect variants

    are

    stron gly affected

    in

    vigo ur, since selection

    of

    variat ion

    for

    basic research, al though

    is thetype that has been,and

    is,

    exploited

    for

    plant breeding. Fu r therm ore ,

    ofna tur al se lection has ledtogenotypes

    to specific enviro nm ents. Th is a daptat ion

    in

    ecological/

    the

    species, w hich

    is

    very obvious

    in

    of cult ivated pla nts . Th is source of

    to

    physiological

    has not bee n v ery accessible for genetic

    and

    even less

    so for

    mo lecular genetic

    by quanti tat ive

    on theexpression of the

    A

    n u m b e r

    of

    developments

    in

    gene tics, such

    as

    in m arker technology (Rafalski

    and in

    the improvemen t

    of

    statistical

    the

    genetic detection

    of

    single

    the genetic variation for such

    are

    identified,

    be

    similar

    to

    The analys is

    of

    Q T L s

    is

    based

    on

    the association

    at

    specific positions

    on the

    thema p posit ion ofthe

    The

    availability

    of

    efficient m ark er

    in a

    s laborious way as com pared with other m arker

    such as R FL Ps and i sozymes . Th e problem

    can be

    solved

    by

    using

    zygous mapping populat ions such as setsofdoubled

    haploids (DHs), recombinant backcross l ines

    (RBLs), also called backcross inbred l ines (BILs)

    (Ramsey et

    al,

    1996), introgression lines (Us) (Fshed

    Zam ir, 1995) or substi tut ion l ines. M ore advanced

    material

    of

    this kind are near-isogenic l ines ( N IL s) ,

    differing in a small introg ression from a corre-

    sponding genotype .

    The

    mult ip le

    use of

    these

    populat ions without having to genotype the material

    again with molecular markers, makes these genetic

    stocks extremely valuable. Th is can be d emo nstrated

    by the analysis of traits as different as flowering

    (Jansen

    et al,

    1995)

    and

    seed dorm ancy

    (van der

    Schaar et

    al,

    1997) in the sam e set of R IL s of the two

    most widely used Arabidopsis ecotypes, Landsberg

    erecta {her andColum bia (Col). This popula t ion

    also serves

    as the

    standard map ping popula t ion

    in

    Arabidopsis

    (Lister De an, 1993).Acareful choice

    of pa ren ts e.g. by cho osing extrem es of the genot^^pic

    variat ion within

    a

    species, extends these oppo r-

    tuni t ies even more . Ex amplesof'imm or ta l ' m app ing

    populat ions based

    on

    very different gen otyp es

    are

    t h e R I L s inrice deriv ed from acrossof anupland

    japonica variety with anindicalowland variety (Wan g

    etal, 1994);inbarleytheD H s have been der ived

    from crosses between malt ing

    and

    fodder cultivars

    (Kleinhofs et al, 1993),and in

    Arabidopsis

    crosses

    between European andAfrican ecotypes (Alonso-

    Blanco

    et al,

    unpubl ished) . Af ter

    the

    location,

    quantification and analysisofthe interactionsofloci

    controll ing

    the

    trait

    has

    been made ,

    it

    will

    be

    impor t an t to characterize the individual loci . In

    order

    to

    obtain genotypes w ith only mon ogenic

    differences, the further backcrossing with a recu rrent

    parent (often one

    of

    the parents

    of

    the initial cross)

    wil l be necessary, when working with RILsorD H s .

    This ' Me ndel i s ing ' of aQ T Lcan befacilitatedby

    markers l inked

    to the

    respective loci

    and

    also

    by

    selectionofthe phenot>-peinbackcross po pulat ion s.

    W h e n N I L s

    are

    available, this process

    of

    ' M e n d e l i s i n g ' Q T L s hasalready been perform ed.

    An al ternative approach

    to the

    dissection

    of

    natura l

    genetic variation is to perform a backcrosspro-

    gramme with phenotype-based selection from

    the

    beginning (Fig. 1). After an u m b e r ofbackcrosses,

    the analysis with molecular markers wil l indicate

    what chromosomal regions

    of

    the donor parent

    are

    still present in theselected linesandthereby show

    the

    map

    posit ion

    of

    puta tive Q TL s . O nce

    a NIL

    with monogenic segregation has been obtained,the

    refinement

    of

    the m ap posit ion

    can be

    done

    in the

    progeny of thecross of such a NILcarryingthe

    introgressed gene, with

    the

    recurrent parent .

    The

    selection of recombinants a round the locus of

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    6/9

    M.Koornneef C. Alonso-Blanco and A.J. M. Peeters

    RP DP

    I I

    Parents

    F I

    o

    c

    x:

    F2

    i

    3

    D

    o

    o

    c

    o

    CO

    0

    T D

    X3

    0

    0

    O

    _

    O5

    C

    F8

    I^ L RIL pop ulatio n

    Genotyping with molecular markers covering the genome

    Phenotyping for the trait

    o

    interest and QTL mapping

    1

    1

    Constructiono NILs BILs) con taining a single QTL

    Physiological and genetical characterisation of the NILs

    Figure 1 A

    schematic o utline

    of

    the production and use

    of

    recom binan t inbred lines RI Ls) and near isogenic

    lmes NIL s). RP, recurrent parent; DP , donor paren t;

    S,

    selected plan t; BI L, backcross inb red line.

    cloning procedures. A potential problem is that it

    will be difficult to distinguish if one gene or more

    than one very closely linked genes determine the

    traits that segregate monogenically. The determi-

    nation of a very detailed map position will be

    especially important in those species where the

    complete physical map is available and for which in

    the near future the complete sequence of the genome

    will become available. When the biochemical func-

    tions of the genes located in the region of the QTL

    are known, one might 'guess' the candidate gene.

    Knowledge of the position of open-reading frames

    will also allow the selection of clones that can be used

    for transformation, which will provide the proof of

    the successful cloning by complementation. Al-

    though in natural alleles it will not be clear whether

    one is dealing with alleles that make a functional

    To knock out the wild type allele, a mutatio

    approach can be followed to find null mutants. T

    detailed map position is also important when tra

    posons are used for this, because this will permit

    choice of a genotype with a transposable element

    the vicinity of the target gene and thereby incre

    the chance of finding insertions in the target ge

    since transposable elements have a tendency to ins

    predominantly to linked sites (Sundaresan, 199

    Furthermore, when many ESTs are mapped in

    region of interest, it will enable the use of DN

    sequences in combination with transposons to p

    form reverse genetics. Such EST probes can also

    used for the detection of deletions caused

    irradiation mutagenesis.

    Examples of 'natural' monogenic traits that ha

    been cloned are many disease resistance genes (Jon

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    7/9

    Genetics in plant physiology

    and for which map-based cloning efforts have been

    initiated are the flowering-time genes

    FRI

    (Clarke

    Dean, 1993) andFLC (Lee et al 19946) in

    Arabidopsis.

    CONCLUDING REMARKS

    The use of genetics has been successfully exploited

    to dissect plant developmental processes.

    In

    par-

    ticular, the combination of genetics with biochem-

    istry and molecular biology allows the study of the

    gene functions. The interaction between genes can

    be studied by theanalysis of double mu tants.

    However, the classical genetic approach is limited in

    specific processes for which mutations are lethal or

    no obvious phenotype. T he latter might be due

    or that thegenes have no clear

    or allconditions . For these

    ofgenes with rela-

    beimportant

    ofgenes

    ooked in many m utan t isolation experi-

    ofgenetic variation is more

    ists. Th e exploitation of natural variation m ight

    for this, as well as for

    in

    M Corzaan P Stiek ema WJ Pereira A. 1995. A

    two-element Enhancer-Inhibitor transposon system

    in

    Arabi-

    dopsis thaliana. Molecular GeneralGenetics 247: 555-564.

    HY4gene ofA. thaliana

    encodes

    a

    protein with characteristics

    of a

    blue-light photo-

    receptor.

    Nature

    66:

    162-166

    DJ K ing RW Wh itelam GC Boylan MT Wagner D

    Quail PH. 1995.

    Flowering responses to altered expression of

    phytochrome inm utan ts and transgenic linesof Arabidopsis

    thaliana(L.) Heynh. Plant Physiology108: 1495-1503.

    . Bhatt AM Sjodin C Scofield S Jon es JDG De an

    C. 1992.

    Development of anefficient two eleme nt tagging

    system in Arab idopsis thaliana. Molecular andGeneral Genetics

    233: 449-461.

    T M eyer K Leube M Rodriguez P Grill

    E. 1996. Genetic analysisofABA -mediated controlofplant

    growth. AbstractinAbscisic acid signal transduction in plants.

    Madrid: Juan March Foundation.

    M

    Ecker

    J

    Theologis

    S

    Federspeil

    N

    Davis

    R.

    very low fiuences of light and canopy shade light in

    Arabidopsis

    PlantPhysiology 110:439-444.

    Burr

    B

    Burr FA. 1991. Recombinant inbreds formolecular

    mapping

    in

    maize: theoretical

    and

    practical consideration

    Trends inGenetics 7: 55-60.

    Biischges R Hollr icher K Panstruga R Simo ns G W olter

    M Frijters A van Da elen R van der Lee T Diergaarde P

    Groenendijk J Topsch

    S

    Vo s

    P

    Salamini

    F

    Schulze-

    Lefert P. 1997.

    The barley

    Mlo

    gene; a novel control element

    of plant pathogen resistance. Cell

    88-

    695-705

    Clarke JH De an C. 1993.

    Mappmg FRI

    a

    locus controlling

    flowermg time andvernalization response inArabidopsis

    thaliana.Molecular andGeneral Genetics 242:

    81-89.

    Cutler S Gh ass em ian M Bonetta D Cooney S McCourt P.

    1996.

    A protein farnesyl transferase involved

    in

    abscisic acid

    signal transduction in Arabidopsis.

    Science 273;

    1239-1241

    Duckham SC Linforth RST Taylor IB. 1991. Abscisic acid

    deficient mutants

    at

    the

    ab a

    locus of

    Arabidopsis thaliana

    are

    impaired in the epoxydation ofzeaxanthin. Plant Cell and

    Environment 14 :631-636.

    Eshed Y Zam ir D. 1995.An introgression line population of the

    cultivated tom ato enables the identification and fine mapping of

    yield-associated QTL.

    Genetics 141:

    1147-1162.

    Feldmann KA. 1991.

    T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in

    Arabi-

    dopsis:

    mutational spectrum.

    Plant Journal

    1:71 82.

    Finkelstein RR. 1994. Mutationsattwo new

    Arabidopsis

    ABA

    responsive loci are similar to

    abiS

    mutations.

    Plant Journal5-

    765-771.

    Garner WW Allard HA. 1920.

    Effect of relative length of day

    and night and other factors of the environment on growth and

    reproduction in plants. Journal Agricultural Research 18-

    553-606.

    Giraudat J Hauge BM Valon C S m a l l e J ParcyF

    Goodman HM. 1992. Isolation of theArabidopsisABBgene

    by positional cloning.

    Plant Cell 4:

    1251-1261.

    Giraudat J Parcy F B ertauch e N Gosti F Leu ng J M oris P-

    C

    Bouvier-Durand M Vartanian N. 1994.Current advances

    in abscisic acid action and signalling.

    Plant Molecular Biology

    26 : 1557-1577.

    Haughn GW Schultz EA Martinez-Zapater JM. 1995.

    The

    regulation of fioweringin Arabidopsis thaliayia:meristems,

    morphogenesis, and mutants.

    Canadian Journal of Botanv 73

    959-981.

    Jansen RC. 1996.

    Complex plant traits: time

    for

    poh^genic

    analysis.

    Trends Plant Science

    1: 89-94.

    Jansen RC Van Ooijen JW. Stam P Lister C De an C. 1995.

    Genotjrpe by environment interaction ingenetic m apping of

    multiple quantitative trait loci. Theoretical 8i AppliedGenetics

    9 1 :3 3 - 3 7 .

    Jones DA Jones JDG. 1997.

    The roleofleucine-rich repeat

    proteins inplant defences. AdvancesinBotanical Research

    Advances in Plant Pathology24 :

    89-167.

    Karssen CM Brinkhorst-van der Swan DLC Breekland AE

    Koornneef M. 1983.

    Induction of dormancy during seed

    development by endogenous abscisic acid: studies with abscisic

    acid deficient genotypes

    ofArabidopsis thaliana

    (L.) Heynh.

    Planta 157:

    158-165.

    Kau schm ann A Jessop A K oncz C Sz ekeres M Willm itzer

    L Altmann T. 1996.

    Genetic evidence for the essential role of

    brassinosteroids in plant developmen t. Plant Journal 9:

    701-713.

    Kerckhoffs LHJ Schreuder MEL van Tuinen A Koornneef

    M Kendrick RE. 1997. Phytochrome control of anthocyanin

    biosynthesis in tomato seedlings: anah'sis using photo mo -

    rphogenic plants

    Photochemistry arid Photobiology

    65 ,

    374381.

    Kleinhofs A Kilian A Saghai Maroof MA Biyashev RM

    H a ye sP Chen FQ LapitanN Fenwich A Blake TK

    Kanazin V An aniev E Da hleen L Kudrna D Bollinger J

    Knapp SJ Liu B S orrells M He un M Francko wiak JD

    Hoffma n D Skads en R Steffenson BJ. 1993.

    A molecular,

    isozyme and morphological m ap of the barley{Hordeum vulgare

    genome.

    Theoretical

    and Applied

    Genetics

    86: 705-712.

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    8/9

    M.Koornneef, C.Alonso-Blanco andA.J. M.Peeters

    Koornneef

    M.

    Rolff E. Spruit CJP.

    1980. Genetic controlof

    light-inhibited hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana

    L.) Heynh. Zeitschrift fiir Pflanzenphysiologie

    100:

    147-160.

    L ee

    I

    Aukerm an MJ Mich aels SD W eaver IM John MC

    Amasino RM. 1994a.

    Isolation

    oiLUMfNIDEPENDENS

    :

    a gene involvedinthe controlofflowering timeinArabidopsis.

    Plant Cell 6:

    75-83.

    L e e

    I

    Mic hae l s

    SD

    Masshardt

    AS

    Amasino RM. 19946.

    The late-flowering phenotype ofFRfGfDA andmutationsin

    LUMINfDEPENDENS is suppressed in the Land sbergerecta

    strainofArabidopsis. Plant Journal6:903-909.

    Leon-Kloosterz ie l KM Alvarez-Gi l

    M

    Ruijs GJ Jacobsen

    SE Olsz e wski

    NE

    Schvs^artz

    SH

    Zeevaart JAD Koor-

    nn eef M . 1996 e.

    Isolation and characterization of abscisic acid

    -deficient Arabidopsismutants at two newloci. Plant Journal

    10 :

    655-661.

    Leon-Kloosterz ie l

    KM van de

    Bunt

    GA

    Zeevaart

    JAD

    Koor nne e f

    M.

    19966.

    Arabidopsis mutants with a reduced

    seed dormancy. Plant Physiology

    110:

    233-240.

    Le ung

    J

    Bouvier-Durand

    M

    Morris

    P-C

    Guerrier

    D

    Chefdor F Giraudat

    J.

    1994.

    rabidopsis ABA-response gene

    ABfl: features of a calcium-modulated protein phosphatase.

    Science264: 1448-1452.

    Le ung

    J

    Merlot

    S and

    Giraudat

    J. 1997.

    TheArabidopsis

    ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE 2 ABI2)andABIl genes

    encode homologous phosphatases2Cinvolved in abscisic acid

    signal transduction. Plant Cell

    9:

    759-771.

    Li J Nag pal P Vitart V M cM orris TC Chory J. 1996.

    Arole

    for brassinosteroids in light-dependent development of Arab-

    idopsis. Science : 3 9 8 ^ 0 1 .

    Lin

    C

    Robertson

    DE

    Ahm ad M Raibekas

    AA

    S c h u m a n

    Jorns

    M

    Dutton

    PL

    Cashmor e

    AR.

    1995.

    Associationof

    flavin adenine dinucleotide with the

    Arabidopsis

    blue light

    receptor CRYl. Science269: 968-970.

    Lister

    C,

    De an

    C.

    1993.

    Recombinant inbred linesformapping

    R F L P andphenotypic markers in

    Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant

    Journal . 4:745-750.

    Mack night R B ancroft I P age T L ister C Sc hm idt R Love

    K Westphal

    L

    Murphy

    G

    Sherson

    S

    Cobbet C Dean

    C.

    1997.

    FCA,a gene controlling flowering time inA rabidopsis

    encodesaprotein containing RN A-bin ding miotifsand aW W

    protein interaction domain. Cell

    89 :

    737-745.

    Marin

    E

    N u s s a u m e

    L

    Que sada

    A

    Gonne au

    M

    Sotta

    B

    Hugue ne y

    P

    Frey

    A

    Marion-Poll

    A. 1996. Molecular

    identification ofzeaxanthin epoxidaseofNicotiana plumbagini-

    folia

    a

    gene involved in abscisic acid biosynthesis and

    corresponding to the

    ABA

    locusoi rabidopsis thaliana. EMBO

    Journal 15 :

    2331-2342.

    Martinez-Zapater JM Coupland

    G

    De an

    C

    Koornneef M.

    1994. Thetransition to flowering inArabidopsis. In: Meye-

    rowitz EM, Somerville CR, eds.

    Arabidopsis.

    New Y ork: Cold

    Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 403-434.

    Meyer K Leube MP Grill E. 1994.

    Aprotein phosphatase2C

    involved in ABA signal transduction inArabidopsis thaliana.

    Science264: 1452-1455.

    O y a m a

    T

    Shimura

    Y

    Okada

    K.

    1996.HY5 gene: a signal

    regulator of photomorphogenesis and root de velopme nt.

    Abstract

    S65. 7th

    International Conference

    on

    Arabidopsis

    Research Norwich,UK.

    Parcy

    F

    Giraudat J. 1997.

    Interactions betweenthe

    ABIl

    and

    the ectopically expressed ABI3 genes in controlling abscisic

    acid responses inArabidopsisvegetative tissues. Plant Journal

    11 : 693-702.

    Parks BM Quail PH. 1991.

    Phytochrome-deficient hyl an dhy2

    long hypocotyl mutants ofArabidopsisaredefective in phyt-

    ochrome chromophore biosynthesis.

    Plant Cell3 :

    1177-1186.

    Peeters

    AJM

    Koornneef

    M. 1996.

    Genetic variation

    in

    flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Seminars in Cell and

    Developmental Biology7 381-389.

    Pratt LH. 1995.

    Phytochro me s: differential properties, expression

    patterns and molecular evolution. PhotochemistryandPhoto-

    biology

    61 :

    10-21.

    Putteril l

    J

    Robson

    F Lee K

    Simon

    R

    Coupland

    G. 1995.

    T h e CON STAN S geneo i rabidopsisprom otes flowering

    and

    encodes a protein showing similarities with a zinc fl

    transcription factor. Cell

    8 0:

    847-857.

    Rafalski

    JA

    Tingey

    SV. 1993.

    Genetic diagnostics in p

    breeding: RAPDs, microsatellites and machines. Trend

    Genetics9:275-280.

    Ram say LD Jenn ings DE Bohu on EJR Arthur AE Lydi

    DJ Kearsey MJ Marshall DF. 1996.

    Theconstruction

    substitution libraryof recombinant backcross linesin Bras

    oleracea

    for the precision mapping of quantitative trait l

    Genome 29 : 558-567.

    Reed JW N agpal

    P

    Poole

    DS

    Furuya

    M

    Chory

    J. 1

    Mutants in the gene for the red/far -red light rece

    phytochrom e B alter cell elongation and physiological respon

    throughout Arabidopsisdevelopment. Plant Cell5 : 147-15

    Rock CD Zeevaart JAD. 1991.

    Theabamutant ofArabido

    thaliana is impairedinepoxy-carotenoid biosynthesis.Proc

    ings of the National Academy of Science USA.

    7496-7499.

    Scheres B Wolkenfe lt H W il lems en V Terlouw M Law

    E

    De an

    C

    Weisbeek

    P. 1994.Em bryonic origin of

    Arabidopsis primary root and root m eristem initials. De

    lopment

    120:

    2475-2487.

    Schmidt R WestJ Love K Leneha n Z Lister C Thom p

    H Bouc he z

    D

    Dean C. 1995.Physical mapandorganisa

    oi rabidopsisthalianachromosome4.Science

    270:

    4 8 0 ^ 8

    Schwartz

    SH

    Leon-Kloosterz ie l KM Koornneef M Z

    aart JAD. 1997.

    Biochemical characterisation

    of

    the aba2

    aba3mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 1

    161-166.

    Simon

    R

    Igeno

    MI

    Coupland

    G.

    1996.

    Activation offl

    meristem identity genesinArabidopsis. Nature

    384:

    59-62

    S o m m e r

    H

    Beltran

    JP

    Huijser

    P

    Pape

    H

    Lonnig

    W

    Saedler H Schw artz-Som mer Z. 1990.

    Deficiens ahome

    gene involved in the control of flower morphogenesis

    Antirrhinum mafus:

    The protein shows homology to tr

    scription factors.

    EMBO Journal

    9:605-613.

    Sun

    T-P

    G o o d m a n

    HM

    Ausubel

    F. 1992.

    Cloning of

    ArabidopsisGAl locusby genomic subtraction. Plant Cel

    119-128.

    Sundaresan

    V. 1996.

    Horizontal spread

    of

    transposon mu

    genesis: new usesfor oldelements. TrendsinPlant Science

    184-190.

    Sundaresan

    V

    Springer

    P

    Volpe

    T.

    Hawar d

    S

    Jones JD

    Dean C Ma H Martienssen R. 1995.

    Pattern s of gene act

    in plant development revealedby enhancer trapandgene t

    transposable elements. Genes and Development9: 1797-181

    Sung ZR Belachew A Shunong B Bertrand-Garcia R. 19

    EMF an Arabidopsis gene required for vegetative sh

    development. Science 25^: 1645-1647.

    Tanksley

    SD

    Ganal

    MW

    Martin

    GB. 1995.Chromoso

    landing: a paradigm formap-based cloninginplants with la

    genomes. TrendsinGenetics

    11 :

    63-68 .

    Terry

    M.

    99 . Phytochrome chromophore-deflcient mutan

    Plant Cell and Environment

    20 :

    740-745.

    van

    der

    Schaar

    W

    Alonso-Blanco

    C

    Leon-Kloosterz

    Jansen

    RC van

    Ooijen

    JW

    Koornneef

    M. 1997. Q

    analysis

    of

    seed dormancy

    in

    Arabidopsis using recombin

    inbred linesandMQ M mapping. Heredity 79 : 190-200.

    Wang G M acki l l DJ Bonman JM McC ouch SR Champo

    M C Ne l son

    RJ. 1994.

    RFL P mapping of genes conferr

    complete andpartial resistance toblast in a durably resist

    rice cultivar. Genetics136: 1421-1434.

    Weigel D. 1995.

    Th e geneticsofflower developmen t: from flo

    induction to ovule morphogenesis. Annual Reviewof Gene

    29 : 19-39.

    White lam

    G

    Johnson

    E

    Pe ng

    J

    Carol

    P

    Anderson

    M

    Cowl JS Harberd NP . 1993.

    PhytochromeAnull m utants

    Arabidopsisdisplayawild-type phenotypeinwhite light. Pl

    Cell 5: 757-768.

    Zac hgo EA Wang ML De w dne y J Bouchez D Camil ler i

    Be lmonte

    S

    H u a n g

    L

    Dolan

    M

    Goodman HM. 1996

    physical mapofchromosome 2oi rabidopsis thaliana. Gen

    Research 6:19-25.

  • 8/11/2019 Koornneef, 1997

    9/9