42. Pres_James Perry

7/29/2019 42. Pres_James Perry

1/25

Canship Ugland Limited

Condition Monitoring

Categorization/Tracking of

Unplanned Maintenance


2/25

To Be Discussed

Introduction

Tracking of number of occurrences per vessel

Tracking of occurrences in accordance with

equipment group

Tracking of occurrences in according to rootcause

Actions taken to date

How does CUL compare Equipment Inspection Practices


3/25

Introduction

In an effort to improve reliability and to make a more

structured approach to the up keep of the managed fleet

tracking of equipment breakdowns commenced in the latter

part of 2007.

In order to utilize processes already in place the following

categorization was used:

To determine equipment category Ships ResearchInstitute Norway (SFI) Group System was chosen as this is

part of our planned maintenance system structure.

To determine cause of failure DNVs MSCAT methodology

was chosen as this is our root cause investigation tool.

Our approach also aligned company procedures with one of

the TMSA Element 4 best practice guidelines.


4/25

Number of Occurrences Per Vessel

The number of occurrences per vessel is monitored in

order to evaluate work load onboard comparing with

percentage outstanding maintenance.


5/25

Unplanned maintenance is tracked in accordance with

SFI equipment group in order to determine if a particular

type of equipment is proving un reliable.

When analyzing this sister ships are also compared.

Tracking of Occurrences in

Accordance With Equipment Group


6/25

Tracking of Occurrences According To Root Cause

Unplanned maintenance is categorized by root cause in

order to determine if training and/or procedure changes

are required.

During analyzing, vessels with similar equipment arecompared to identify common problems.


7/25

Actions To Date

Replaced one type of portable gas meters, additional

training onboard in correct care of portable gas meters.

Included bow loading system training course in matrix for

Senior Engineering Officers.

Sourced training in correct separator maintenance

procedures.

Further investigation of mechanical seal failures on

pumps in HFO service.

Training of ship staff in structural hull inspections.

Company training booklet in correct greasing procedures.

Sourcing training material in correct methods when

replacing ball bearings.

Revising maintenance procedures in regards to electrical

equipment by making greater use of thermal imaging.


8/25

Reliability - How Does CUL Compare?

When comparing Off Hire data CUL compares favorably

in all areas apart from reliability of the bow loading system.


9/25

Methods and Equipment


10/25

Methods

Equipment Unplanned Maintenance Data

Performance Monitoring Data

Oil Analysis

Thermal Imaging Data

Megger Readings

Critical Equipment

Reliability in Service

Cost to Maintain


11/25

Tools

Calibrated Test Equipment for Pressure,

Temperature and Signal Generators for

Monitoring Equipment Equipment Performance Data pumps, coolers,

etc.

Thermal Image Camera

Megger Meter

Engine Performance Monitoring Equipment

Bore scope

Vibration Monitoring


12/25

Typical Bore Scope


13/25

USES

The bore scopes allows the internal

inspection of many components without the

requirement of disassembly to have alook inside. Access can be through

pressure gauge connections or other easily

accessible openings. Photographicevidence can be collected to show internal

condition.


14/25

Applications

Pumps

Coolers Tubular Heat Exchangers

Pipelines

Steam Turbines

Internal Combustion Engines

Boiler Tubes

Engine Turbo Chargers

Difficult to see areas within equipment that

would normally require disassembly of

components to get to the required area.


15/25

Ballast Pump


16/25

Steam Turbine Gearing


17/25

Turbine Blades


18/25

Inert Gas Fan


19/25

Exhaust Valve Main Engine


20/25

Benefits

Inspections can be arranged with normal

maintenance as an example the interior

of an engine cylinder coincides with thechanging of injectors.

Equipment does not have to be fully opened

for inspection. This saves time, materials,assembly difficulties and provides a record

of the internal condition.

Predictive maintenance and life cycles can

be determined based on more than

recommendations but on actual inspection.


21/25

Benefits

Downtime is reduced.

Reduction in parts consumed as part ofnormal inspection.

Alignment of drive components has not

been altered.

Integrity of most seals, gaskets and

fasteners are not disturbed. Reduces

follow up when re-commissioning

equipment.


22/25

Conclusion

There is much equipment available to the

Marine Industry to evaluate the condition of

machinery and pipelines to ensure reliabilityand cost effective maintenance.

The approach taken by Canship is to gather

data and determine the equipment that doesrequire additional monitoring to ensure

reliable, cost effective maintenance without

any reduction in the maintenance standards.

This has proven to be effective with costs

and reliability.


23/25

Conclusion

In times of monetary restraints, the decision

to spend money to maintain equipment must

be balance with the best procedures toevaluate the requirements and benefits of

doing so.

Evaluation of specific equipment will indicatethose which need additional monitoring tools

to ensure reliability and also the most

suitable tool for the task.


24/25

Closing Thoughts

When man was first to go into space, two

countries, faced with the same challenge of

record keeping in space took different

approaches to meet the need.

One country spent an unknown amount of money

to develop a pen that would write in zero gravity,

at any temperature, with an ink that would not beaffected by temperature.

The other country took a box of pencils.

There are ways to address the requirements of

maintenance without un-necessary high costs.

Select the right test equipment to meet your

requirements.


25/25

Thank You

42. Pres_James Perry

Documents

Transcript of 42. Pres_James Perry