ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

22
ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer

Transcript of ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

Page 1: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP

ICT and Company Practise

College Innovation Management

Vrijdag 25 april 2007

Geleyn Meijer

Page 2: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Tentamen: essay

• 50% bepalend voor cijfer voor dit onderdeel

• Schrijf een case study over minimaal 2 voorbeelden van open innovatie

• Vergelijk case study met vragen uit “een beetje verliefd”

• Omvang essay tussen 2 en drie kantjes A4. Werk in groepen van 3

• Opbouw:– Achtergrond– Vraagstelling– Case study 1– Case study 2– Analyse– Conclusies

Page 3: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Tentamen: presentatie

• 50% bepalend voor cijfer

• een presentatie van het essay

• Alle groepsleden geven een onderdeel van de presentatie

• Iedere presentatie max 15 minuten met 5 minuten Q&A.

Page 4: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP A services based society?

• Vitality of European society increasingly based on services• >70% productivity (BRP) are services

• Services are no products

• The creativity needed to innovate in services is:– closely linked with client interaction and therefore needs to be

embedded in the existing day-to-day relations with the clients

– is an on-line affair since responding to challenges must be swift

– creative results are quickly exposed in the commercial market reality and can have a short life span.

Page 5: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Embedded Innovation (1)

Key features:

There is no central research or R&D organisation.• Instead, the staff involved in the innovation process form

a truly virtual organisation within the corporate domain.• Innovation management is a coordination function for the

activities within the operational divisions.• It initiates and coordinates the innovation activites and

ensures alignment with the corporate management team.

• Setting top-down themes, inviting bottum-up initiatives

Page 6: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Embedded Innovation (2)

• Adoption and hype curves

Reality

Expectation(hype)

Time

1

2

3

4

Page 7: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP

Private and Confidential 7

Research & InnovationResearch & Innovation

Innovation and solution developmentHand-off

HypeTurnover

Client alignment & Internal fitClient alignment & Internal fit

Strategy & PortfolioManagementStrategy & PortfolioManagement

SolutionDevelopmentSolutionDevelopment

Marketing

Sales

DIDI DFDF DLDLDJDJDRDR

Investments

Hand OffEarly stage qualificationInnovation domain

Defined propositionExecution domain

Page 8: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Embedded Innovation (3)

• EDEN (Exploration, Development and ExploitatioN)

Exploration Development Exploitation

Reality

Expectation(hype)

Time

New Business ItemsMonitoring Choices Steer

1

2

3

4

Page 9: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Embedded Innovation – 3 steps

Operating unit

CEO

Operating unit

Operating unit

Operating unit

Operating unit

Portfolio management Innovation management

13

2

Balancing, Handover, Implementation

Page 10: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Case-study 1

• Developing a M-ticket service for railway operators

• 2000 Exploration• 2001 Development of prototype• 2002-3 Validation pilot• 2004 Market take-up

Page 11: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Case Study 1 - Results

The lessons learnt :

• in the exploration phase, involve end-user representatives and academics.

• manage expectations in delivery units since it takes more than one budget year to get mature solutions.

• in the solution development phase, don’t stick to ambitions of exploration phase. Market take-up comes in different areas and under different names.

• in the launching phase, widen up the scope of potential use and look for quick wins, even if that implies to postpone to apply the original exploration results. This requires a shift in involved personnel as well.

Page 12: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Case Study 2

Developing a GRID-service provider

• 40 M€• 2004 – 2008• 20 partners• Academic – Industrial

• Early days for non-academic applications

• Leads toclock-frequenciesdilemma

Grid Services

VL-e Application Oriented Services

Page 13: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Case Study 2 - Results

The lessons learnt:

• install an internal project team which acts as shadow to the large cooperation project. Use this team to expose the rest of the organisation to the new topic.

• the shadow team reaps results from the cooperation project and translates these to internal company expectations. These results are focussed on the immediate corporate needs such as strategy formulation, communication, strategic client interaction, retention.

• Pay constant attention to the hype cycle. Appreciate that there is no easy ride and that actual progress takes time. If the hype rising steeply, it may come down just as swift.

Page 14: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP

Business case: 06-bier

Page 15: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Business case: 06-Bier

Video

Page 16: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP 06Bier

• Register group

• SMS per participant

• ‘Paying participant’ is assigned with SMS

• “Beer on the house” given at random by bar

Page 17: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP 06Bier business case

• StakeholdersWho are stakeholders, investers, users?

• Value chainWho produces what to whom; who pays for

what?

• Marketing & acceptanceTarget group, marketing, business case?

• Go/nogo?

Page 18: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Managed services

Page 19: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP

Invoice for the Yearly participation fee

Amstel Bars and Cafes

Users (06Bier players)

MSP

TELCOs

Invoice for the Yearly participation fee

Invoice for 06Bier SMS (post-paid users)

Invoice for the 06Bier SMS that the MSP sends to the players as feedback.

Invoice for the Shared percentage of the extra SMS traffic originated by 06Bier.

Page 20: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP

Tijd

Marketing ICT produkten

Acc

ep

tati

e

1-3 jaar

Page 21: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP Diffusion of innovations

• Innovators• Early adaptors• Early majority• Late majority• Laggards

•Techies

•Visionaries

•Pragmatists

•Conservatives

•Skeptics

Page 22: ICP ICT and Company Practise College Innovation Management Vrijdag 25 april 2007 Geleyn Meijer.

ICP

1. A dvantage to the user;

2. C ompatibility with lifestyle;

3. C omplexity of use;

4. O bservability of the benefits to others;

5. R isk (financial or social) to the user

6. D ivisibility of the application

• increase perceptions of Advantage, Compatibility, Observability and Divisibility

• decrease perceptions of Complexity and Risk

The ACCORD analysis