Affidavit of

Fact

28 U.S.C Sec. 1333 and 1337

NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL

COMMERCIAL CLAIM OF LIEN Notice to agent is notice on the principals, notice to the

principles is a notice to the agents.

To: LARRIANTE J SUMBRY To: SUMBRY J LARRIANTE To: LARRIANTE JALAPENO SUMBRY, SUMBRY LARRIANTE JALAPENO, LARRIANTE J. SUMBRY, L J SUMBRY, SUMBRY L J, LARRIANTE SUMBRY, SUMBRY LARRIANTE, LARRIANTE JALAPENO SUMBRY EL, EL SUMBRY LARRIANTE JALAPENO.

YOU are hereby charged jointly and severally for the unlawful arrest ( false imprisonment) breach of UCC Contract, Social Security Act 1935; Privacy Act 197 4, Title 15 and piracy plunder enslavement rulership of an Indigenous Inhabitant (Larriante Sumbry©) having Aboriginal Status, bound to no contract with the 'State' or City for commercial obligations; Wherefore you have been charged Four Hundred Twenty Million in lawful coinage/ bullion. Indefinitely and in perpetuity until the debt is paid in full. Pursuant to the Aborigine Proclaimation/ Charter and Fee Schedule of 2017

Library of Congress filing number AA222141_____ Library of

__ AA222141_____ Library of congress acknowledgement receipt attached.

In the Matters of: unlawful arrest( false imprisonment (breach) of UCC Contract, false impersonation, Privacy Act 197 4, Title 15 USC, failure to follow statute, lack of due process of law; for alleged case #314806124; NP-80-30-20-10-C·

' repository #'s

00001RA39342 7640US-Indiana; File#1274093, 11-73071109

AMRI 455217196,

Violation date: On or about October 22 year of 1973. Forty six ( 46) years of violations of false impersonation against my will.

This action is secured: under private registered bond, full faith and credit of the United States of America, Loyalty account held by the Office of the Secretary united States of Amercia and Uniform Commercial Code Master Lien filing no.200900002550962 Authorities; Aborigine Proclaimation/ Charter, Treaty of Peace and Friendship, Law of Nations, Constitution, Uni£ orm Commercial Code (Private Remedy).

Brief on Jurisdiction Secured party complainant has exhausted all

lawful remedies. State of Ohio , City of Cincinnati has no lawful claims against the

Aborigine with tribal status. 1) "Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court

cannot proceed when it clearly appears that

the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no

authority to reach merits, but, rather, should

dismiss the action." Melo v. US, 505 F2d

1026. 2) "There is no discretion to ignore that

lack of jurisdiction." Joyce v. US, 474 F2d

215. 3) "The burden shifts to the court to

prove jurisdiction." Rosemond v. Lambert,

469 F2d 416. 4) "Court must prove on the

record, all jurisdiction facts related to the

jurisdiction asserted. 5) " Lantana v. Hopper,

102 F2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F

Supp 150. 6) "A universal principle as old as

the law is that a proceedings of a court

without jurisdiction are a nullity and its

judgment therein without effect either on

person or property." Norwood v. Renfield, 34

C 329; Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732. 7)

"Jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment

rendered by a court that does not have

jurisdiction to hear is void ab initio. 8) " In

Re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132; Re

Cavitt, 118 P2d 846. 9) "Thus, where a

judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the

subject matter on which it assumes to act, its

proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest

sense of the term. 10) " Dillon v. Dillon, 187

P 27.11) "A court has no jurisdiction to

determine its own jurisdiction, for a basic

issue in any case before a tribunal is its

power to act, and a court must have the

authority to decide that question in the first

instance." Rescue Anny v. Municipal Court

of Los Angeles, 171 P2d 8; 331 US 549, 91

L. ed. 1666, 67 S.Ct. 1409. 12) "A departure

by a court from those recognized and

established requirements of law, however

close apparent adherence to mere form in

method of procedure, which has the effect of

depriving one of a constitutional right, is an

excess of jurisdiction." Wuest v. Wuest, 127

P2d 934, 937.

13) "Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it

amounts to denial of due process of law,

court is deprived of juris." Merritt v. Hunter,

C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739. 14) "the fact that

the petitioner was released on a promise to

appear before a magistrate for an

arraignment, that fact is circumstance to be

considered in determining whether in first

instance there was a probable cause for the

arrest." Monroe v. Papa, DC, Ill. 1963, 221 F

Supp 685. TRIBAL IMMUNITY: Congress

by approval from the Emperor of Morocco

has the final word as to the scope of tribal

sovereignty and the powers that Tribes are

able to exercise. 15) One exception to this

general rule is the doctrine of tribal sovereign

immunity. Tribal sovereign immunity is part

of federal common. law; it was not created

by any statute or act of Congress. 16) Rather,

the Supreme Court first identified it, and its

exact boundaries have been further defined

through a substantial body of federal case

law.17) A. THE DOCTRINE OF TRIBAL

SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY The Supreme

Court first acknowledged tribal sovereign

immunity in Turner v. United States, in

which a non-Indian lessee was barred from

suing an Indian tribe for alleged damage

done to his property. 18) The Court stated

that it is the "general law" that "[l]ike other

governments, municipal as well as state,

[tribes are] free from liability for injuries to

persons or property . . . . " 19) In United

States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty

Co., 20) the Supreme Court reiterated that

Indian tribes are immune from suit when it

voided a monetary judgment from a previous

proceeding against the Choctaw and

Chickasaw Nations. 21) It stated that tribes

do not waive their sovereign immunity when

they fail to object to cross-claims in

litigation. 22) In Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v.

Department of Game of State of Washington,

the Court held that a state could not sue a

tribe to enforce its fishin regulations in

Indian country "[a]bsent an effective waiver

or consent" from either the Tribe or the

United States, [ THE ENTIRE uNITED

STATES OF AMERICA IS "INDIAN

COUNTRY] and the Moors are the

Aboriginal Indigenous Autochthonous,

Autonomous Inhabitants to the land in the

America's. 23) In Santa Clara Pueblo v.

Martinez, the Court expanded Puyallup's

holding by stating that any waiver of tribal

immunity 'must be unequivocally expressed'.

24) In Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen

Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe, the Court

rejected a contention that was nearly identical

to the one it had addressed in United States

Fidelity over a half-century prior, further

solidifying the status of tribal immunity as

black letter law. 25) In Kiowa Tribe of

Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies,

Inc., the Supreme Court, for the first time,

declared that Native American tribes were

immune from suit for activities engaged in

outside of Indian country. Specifically, the

Court declared: "Tribes enjoy immunity from

suits on contracts, whether those contracts

involve governmental or commercial

activities and whether they were made on or

off a reservation. [ INCLUDING THE

INVOLUNTARY CONTRACT WITH THE

STATE OF OHIO AND CITY OF

CINCINNATI] The Court did express some

hesitation in reaching this decision, stating

that "[t]here are reasons to doubt the wisdom

of perpetuating the doctrine [ of tribal

immunity]." 26) "[T]ribal immunity extends

beyond what is needed to safeguard tribal

self-governance," the Court stated, and this

"consideration[] might suggest a need to

abrogate tribal immunity .... " 27) However,

because Congress had not specifically

abrogated tribal immunity in the context of

the case, the Court "decline[d] to revisit [its]

case law and [chose] to defer to Congress."

Larriante Sumbry status is pursuant to Biblical Law,

International Treaty Law, Law of Nations and Natural

Law(Tribal Immunity). Immunity from prosecution is

a doctrine of International law. Sovereign immunity,

or crown immunity, is a legal doctrine by which

the sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong

and is immune from civil suit or criminal

prosecution. In constitutional monarchies the

sovereign is the historical origin of the authority

which creates the courts. Thus the courts had no

power to compel the sovereign to be bound by the

courts, as they were created by the sovereign for the

protection of his or her subjects. [Treaty of Peace and

Friendship 1786, 1787, & 1836] - Created , approved

and filed at the Library of Congress by the Emperor

of Morocco] Ruling power having governance over

his Dominion [united States of America], still in full

effect as of the year of 2019. These birth rights,

privileges and inheritance has been passed down to

the descendent Moors of the America's.

This matter has already been decided at law, in law and is of LAW. Stare Decisis.

Parties that have committed Treason against the united States of America, Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786, 1787 & 1836, ''We the Aborigine of Amexem", Constitution, as well as their Oaths of Office.

The STATE of OHIO, Judicial Branch, Law Enforcement Arms. ALL that were involved, aided, abetted and conspired in the "unlawful UCC Contract (malfeasance), Rico Act 109, failure to follow statute, due process of law violations", all officials that did not stand in law, did not uphold the state of OHIO, continental united states Constitution or their law enforcement cannon that they all have sworn on oath to uphold and protect, are hereby Charged.

Lien Debtors and Liable Parties; Jointly and Severally.

To: LARRIANTE JALAPENO SUMBRY, LARRI J SUMBRY, SUMBRY LARRIANTE JALAPENO, L JALAPENO SUMBRY, L. JALAPENO SUMBRY LARRIANTE JALAPENO

JALAPENO SUMBRY, LARRIANTE JALAPENO SUMBRY EL, LARRY SUMBRY EL, EL LARRY SUMBRY, LARRIANTE J SUMBRY, SUMBRY J LARRIANTE, L JAMES SUMBRY, L J SUMBRY, LARRIANTE JALEPENO SUMBRY,

Statements of fact stands as Truth in Commerce. Affidavit and Claim against the liable parties is the Judgment. Res Judicata. Claim of Commercial Lien against the Liable Parties named in this Affidavit are in the Sum Certain amount of:

$ 420 Million in united States lawful coin, (Four Hundred Twenty Million of lawful coinage).

NOTICE: You have (3) hours to remove any illegal transactions of Larriante Jalapeno Sumbry . There will be an additional (100 million) One Hundred Million in lawful coinage per day penalty for the tether violation. For every day that Larriante Jalapeno Sumbry records are displayed negatively in the public record and fraudulently because of the unlawful arrest there shall be an addition (100 Million) per occurrence, per online website streaming real time.

Bill of Particulars and Charges

Usurpation of the Constitution of the continental united States $100,000,000.00 Damages to the Aboriginal

$ 100,000,000.00 Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law Title 18 u.s.c. $ 100,000,000.00 Conspiracy against rights Title 18 U.S.C. Chapter 13§ 241. $ 100,000,000.00 Kidna ing

$ 100,000,000.00 Duress and Coercion $ 100,000,000.00 Malfeasance $ 100,000,000.00

$700,000,000.00

Xl0 Compensatory and Punitive

TOTAL SUM CERTAIN FOR DAMAGES $70,000,000,000 lawful coinage uSD

This lawful claim is filed for the public record indefinitely and filed with all heads of 'State'.

Further affiant sayth not -

Secured Party Creditor Family of :Sumbry

Re-Insurer Family of : Sumbry

28USC1746

I certify under the penalties of the perjury under the Zodiac Constitution, that the foregoing are true and correct.

. 777

. 777

31BA8BF394EE4A4A

THIS IS WHAT I DO TO PEOPLE THAT VIOLATE

ME AND MY FAMILY