JUSTUS-LIEBIG- Stefan Schippers I M P UNIVERSITÄT · 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10-6 10-4 10-2...
Transcript of JUSTUS-LIEBIG- Stefan Schippers I M P UNIVERSITÄT · 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10-6 10-4 10-2...
Storage-ring measurements of hyperfine-induced
and two-photon transition rates
in berylliumlike ions
Stefan Schippers
Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik
JUSTUS-LIEBIG- UNIVERSITÄT GIESSEN
I M PA
www.uni-giessen.de/cms/iamp
Outline
1. Motivation • hyperfine quenching of ns np 3P0 states in divalent atoms and ions
• theoretical and experimental results
• some applications
2. Experiments at heavy-ion storage rings • lifetime measurements
• electron-ion recombination
3. Hyperfine induced 3P0 1S0 transition rate • results for 47Ti18+
• results for 33S12+
4. E1M1 two-photon 3P0 1S0 transition rate • results for 136Xe50+
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 2
2s2p 3P – 2s2 1S transitions in Be-like ions
2s2 1S
J=2
J=1
J=0
2s 2p 3P
J=0
ground state
metastable
M2 (medium)
IC (fast)
E1M1 (very slow)
HFI (slow)
hyperfine-interaction
requires
nucleus
with I>0
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 3
He-like vs. Be-like ions
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 4
Review: W. Johnson, Can. J. Phys. 89 (2011) 429
E1
E1
M1 HFIE1M2
1s2s 1S
0
1s2s 3S
1
1s2p 1P
1
1s2p 3P
2
1s2p 3P
0
1s2p 3P
1
1s2 1S
0
He-like
HFIE1
2s2p 1P
1
2s2p 3P
2
2s2p 3P
1
2s2p 3P
0
2s2 1S
0
E1
M2
Be-like
E1
HFI HFI
Theoretical predictions of 2s2p 3P0 lifetimes
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
millisecond
second
minute
hour
year
month
Lifetim
e (
s)
Nuclear charge
E1M1
[Laughlin, PLA 75, 199 (1980)]
HFI [Cheng et al., PRA 77, 052504 (2008)]
day
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 5
Ultraprecise optical clocks
Al+ clock transition: 3s 3p 3P0 3s2 1S0
T. Rosenband et al., PRL 98 (2007) 220801
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 6
13C/12C abundance ratio in planetary nebulae
R. H. Rubin et al., ApJ 605 (2004) 784
M2
HFI
1S
J=
2 1 0
3P
J=0
IC
shedding light on stellar nucleosynthesis
NGC 2440
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 7
„Experimental“ HFI lifetime from a planetary nebula
M2
IC
HFI
istope A=14
rel. abundance 99.63%
nuclear spin I=1
2s2p 3P0 lifetime:
from astrophysical
observation and modeling:
2500800 s
theory:
Brage et al. 2033 s
Marques et al. 7806 s
beryllium-like nitrogen
in the planetary nebula NGC 3918
T. Brage et al., PRL 89 (2002) 281101
1S
J=
2 1 0
3P
J=0
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 8
The challenge
measurement of an extremely long lifetime
prediction for the 47Ti18+(2s2p 3P0) state: t = 2.8 s
theory by Marques et al., PRA 47 (1993) 929
needs well defined environment
without significant disturbance
of the long-lived state
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 9
The Heidelberg TSR storage ring at MPIK
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 10
Decay of excited states
Injection of ions in metastable states
hn
PM
Fe12+(3s2 3p2 1D2)
TSR: Träbert et al.,
JPB 35, 671 (2002)
t = 8.0 ± 0.1 ms
Most photons
miss
the detector!
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 11
Electron-ion recombination experiments
e- beam
100% detection efficiency
Aq+ + e- A(q-1)+ + photons
collision experiments with dilute ensembles of particles
tunable relative energy: sub meV to sub MeV
Reaction products
• beams of high directionality
• high particle energies in lab frame
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 12
Dielectronic recombination (DR) - viewed as a two-step process -
Ti18+(2s2) + e-
2s
2p
nl
dielectronic
capture (DC)
Ti17+(2s 2p nl)
radiative
stabilization
Ti17+(2s2 2p) + hn
photons
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 13
Measuring the 3P0 lifetime using DR as a tool
Idea:
• stored Be-like ion beam contains a 3P0 fraction,
if 3P0 lifetime is sufficiently long (> 1ms)
• 2s 2p 3P0 excitation produces distinct
DR (e.g. 2p2 nl) resonances
• measure the „apparent“ DR resonance strength
as a function of storage time
• deduce 3P0 lifetime
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 14
DR of Be-like C2+ - single-pass merged-beams experiment -
N. R. Badnell et al., J. Phys. B 24 (1991) 4441
A
B
C
Resonances of the types
A: 2s2 1S 2s 2p 1P nl
B: 2s 2p 3P 2s 2p 1P nl
C: 2s 2p 3P 2p2 3P nl
mixture
of 75% 2s 2p 3P
and 25% 2s2 1S
in the ion beam
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 15
DR spectrum of Be-like 48Ti18+
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
2
4
6
8
10 2p2 1S
1 nl series
2p2 3P
012 nl series
2p2 1D
2 nl series
n=11
2s 2p 3P
0 nl series
2s 2p 3P
1 nl series
2s 2p 3P
2 nl series
Recom
bin
ation r
ate
coeff. (1
0-9 c
m3 s
-1)
Electron-ion collision energy (eV)
2s 2p 1P
1 nl series
n=8
S. Schippers et al., JPCS 58 (2007) 137
A
Where are
series
B and C?
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 16
Why are 3P0 resonances missing?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3P
1 c
on
tin
uu
m
3P
0 c
on
tin
uu
m
1S
0 c
on
tin
uu
m
3P
1
3P
2
Energ
y r
ela
tive to 3
P0 level (e
V)
3P
0
resona
nce
sta
tes
resonance states above the 3P1 level have an additional
autoionization decay channel
Look for resonances
at low relative energies!
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 17
Ti18+ DR spectrum at low energies
0
1
2
Recom
b. ra
te c
oeff. (1
0-9cm
3 s
-1)
A=48
0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.900
1
2A=47
Electron-ion collision energy (eV)
AUTOSTRUCTURE
5% 3P0: (2s 2p 1P1) 11d
(2s 2p 3P2) 26l
95% 1S0: (2s 2p 3P) 11p
11f
RR
A=47
A=48
Next step: measure
recombination
signal vs. time
S. Schippers et al., JPCS 58 (2007) 137
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 18
0 2 4 6 8200
400
600
800
1000
0 50 100 15010
100
1000
Re
co
mb
ina
tio
n c
ou
nt
rate
(s
-1)
Storage time (s)
Recombination signal at 0.75 eV vs. time
A=48
A=47
A=48
A=47
S. Schippers et al.,
PRL 98 (2007) 033001
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 19
m = 3P0
g = 1S0 Fit:
Data analysis
0 2 4 6 8200
400
600
800
1000
Storage time (s)
Re
co
mb
ina
tio
n c
ou
nt
rate
(s
-1)
A=48
A=47
largest contribution to the experimental uncertainty
essential feature of the method
usage of two isotopes
47Ti18+: AHFI = 0.56(3) s-1
2s2 1S
2 1
J=0 2s2p 3P
J=0
HFI
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 20
Theoretical and experimental 2s2p 3P0 HFI lifetimes
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9010
-6
10-4
10-2
100
102
104
nuclear spin
1/2 1
3/2 3
5/2 5
7/2 7
9/2 9
2s 2
p 3
P0 L
ifetim
e (
s-1)
Nuclear charge Z
present
experimental
value
J. P. Marques, F. Parente & P. Indelicato, PRA 47 (1993) 929
Ti18+ values
1993 theory: 2.812 s Marques et al. PRA 47 (1993) 929
2007 experiment: 1.8(1) s Schippers et al., PRL 98 (2007) 033001
2008 theory: 1.487 s Cheng et al., PRA 77 (2008) 052504
2009 theory: 1.476 s Andersson et al., PRA 79 (2009) 032501
2010 theory: 1.51 s Li & Dong, Plas. Sci. Technol. 79 (2010) 032501
What about
the remaining
discrepancy?
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 21
Influence of external fields
dipole magnets
with B up to 1.3 T
B-field
Zeeman effect: tHFI becomes mF dependent
effect too weak to explain discrepancies
Li et al., Phys. Lett. A 375 (2011) 914
E-field (via v x B)
Stark mixing of 3P0 and 3P1 levels:
effect much too weak to explain discrepancies
Maul et al., J. Phys. B 31 (1998) 2725
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 22
New measurements with Be-like AS12+ ions
10
20
30
40
506070
Co
unt
rate
(1
00 s
-1)
10
100
100
10
100
1
1
0 100 200
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0 100 200
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
Storage time (s)
-5
0
5
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
A=32 A=33
B = 0.44 T
tHFI = 10.5(7) s
B = 0.44 T
tHFI = 10.5(1.4) s
B = 0.88 T
tHFI = 10.2(7) s
S12+ values
theory: 27.69 s Marques et al. (1993)
theory: 10.73 s Cheng et al. (2008)
theory: 10.69 s Andersson et al. (2009)
experiment: 10.4(5) s TSR (2011)
S. Schippers et al., PRA 85 (2012) 012513
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 23
DR of Be-like 132Xe50+
n= 1/23/25/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2; n = 6j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2; n = 7 j=7/2 9/2 11/2 13/2 15/2 j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2; n = 9j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2; n = 10j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=21/2; n = 11j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=23/2; n = 12j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=25/2; n = 13j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=27/2; n = 14j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=29/2; n = 15j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=31/2; n = 16j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=33/2; n = 17j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=35/2; n = 18j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=37/2; n = 19j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=39/2; n = 20j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=41/2; n = 21j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=43/2; n = 22j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=45/2; n = 23j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=47/2; n = 24j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=49/2; n = 25j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=51/2; n = 26j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=53/2; n = 27j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=55/2; n = 28j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=57/2; n = 29j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=59/2; n = 30j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=61/2; n = 31j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=63/2; n = 32j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=65/2; n = 33j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=67/2; n = 34j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=69/2; n = 35j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=71/2; n = 36j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=73/2; n = 37j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=75/2; n = 38j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=77/2; n = 39j=1/2j=3/2j=5/2j=7/2j=9/2j=11/2j=13/2j=15/2j=17/2j=19/2j=79/2; n = 40n=111 j=223/2
n= 81/2
83/2
85/2
j=9/2 11/2 13/2 15/2 91/2
93/2
95/2
97/2
99/2
911/2
913/2
915/2
917/2
101/2
103/2
105/2
107/2
109/2
1011/2
1013/2
1015/2
1017/2
1019/2
111/2
113/2
115/2
117/2
119/2
1111/2
1113/2
1115/2
1117/2
1119/2
1121/2
121/2
123/2
125/2
127/2
129/2
1211/2
1213/2
1215/2
1217/2
1219/2
1223/2
131/2
133/2
135/2
137/2
139/2
1311/2
1313/2
1315/2
1317/2
1319/2
1325/2
141/2
143/2
145/2
147/2
149/2
1411/2
1413/2
1415/2
1417/2
1419/2
1427/2
151/2
153/2
155/2
157/2
159/2
1511/2
1513/2
1515/2
1517/2
1519/2
1529/2
161/2
163/2
165/2
167/2
169/2
1611/2
1613/2
1615/2
1617/2
1619/2
1631/2
171/2
173/2
175/2
177/2
179/2
1711/2
1713/2
1715/2
1717/2
1719/2
1733/2
181/2
183/2
185/2
187/2
189/2
1811/2
1813/2
1815/2
1817/2
1819/2
1835/2
191/2
193/2
195/2
197/2
199/2
1911/2
1913/2
1915/2
1917/2
1919/2
1937/2
201/2
203/2
205/2
207/2
209/2
2011/2
2013/2
2015/2
2017/2
2019/2
2039/2
211/2
213/2
215/2
217/2
219/2
2111/2
2113/2
2115/2
2117/2
2119/2
2141/2
221/2
223/2
225/2
227/2
229/2
2211/2
2213/2
2215/2
2217/2
2219/2
2243/2
231/2
233/2
235/2
237/2
239/2
2311/2
2313/2
2315/2
2317/2
2319/2
2345/2
241/2
243/2
245/2
247/2
249/2
2411/2
2413/2
2415/2
2417/2
2419/2
2447/2
251/2
253/2
255/2
257/2
259/2
2511/2
2513/2
2515/2
2517/2
2519/2
2549/2
261/2
263/2
265/2
267/2
269/2
2611/2
2613/2
2615/2
2617/2
2619/2
2651/2
271/2
273/2
275/2
277/2
279/2
2711/2
2713/2
2715/2
2717/2
2719/2
2753/2
281/2
283/2
285/2
287/2
289/2
2811/2
2813/2
2815/2
2817/2
2819/2
2855/2
291/2
293/2
295/2
297/2
299/2
2911/2
2913/2
2915/2
2917/2
2919/2
2957/2
301/2
303/2
305/2
307/2
309/2
3011/2
3013/2
3015/2
3017/2
3019/2
3059/2
311/2
313/2
315/2
317/2
319/2
3111/2
3113/2
3115/2
3117/2
3119/2
3161/2
321/2
323/2
325/2
327/2
329/2
3211/2
3213/2
3215/2
3217/2
3219/2
3263/2
331/2
333/2
335/2
337/2
339/2
3311/2
3313/2
3315/2
3317/2
3319/2
3365/2
341/2
343/2
345/2
347/2
349/2
3411/2
3413/2
3415/2
3417/2
3419/2
3467/2
351/2
353/2
355/2
357/2
359/2
3511/2
3513/2
3515/2
3517/2
3519/2
3569/2
361/2
363/2
365/2
367/2
369/2
3611/2
3613/2
3615/2
3617/2
3619/2
3671/2
371/2
373/2
375/2
377/2
379/2
3711/2
3713/2
3715/2
3717/2
3719/2
3773/2
381/2
383/2
385/2
387/2
389/2
3811/2
3813/2
3815/2
3817/2
3819/2
3875/2
391/2
393/2
395/2
397/2
399/2
3911/2
3913/2
3915/2
3917/2
3919/2
3977/2
401/2
403/2
405/2
407/2
409/2
4011/2
4013/2
4015/2
4017/2
4019/2
4079/2
411/2
413/2
415/2
417/2
419/2
4111/2
4113/2
4115/2
4117/2
4119/2
4181/2
421/2
423/2
425/2
427/2
429/2
4211/2
4213/2
4215/2
4217/2
4219/2
4283/2
431/2
433/2
435/2
437/2
439/2
4311/2
4313/2
4315/2
4317/2
4319/2
4385/2
441/2
443/2
445/2
447/2
449/2
4411/2
4413/2
4415/2
4417/2
4419/2
4487/2
451/2
453/2
455/2
457/2
459/2
4511/2
4513/2
4515/2
4517/2
4519/2
4589/2
461/2
463/2
465/2
467/2
469/2
4611/2
4613/2
4615/2
4617/2
4619/2
4691/2
471/2
473/2
475/2
477/2
479/2
4711/2
4713/2
4715/2
4717/2
4719/2
4793/2
481/2
483/2
485/2
487/2
489/2
4811/2
4813/2
4815/2
4817/2
4819/2
4895/2
491/2
493/2
495/2
497/2
499/2
4911/2
4913/2
4915/2
4917/2
4919/2
4997/2
501/2
503/2
505/2
507/2
509/2
5011/2
5013/2
5015/2
5017/2
5019/2
5099/2
111223/2
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
1
10
2s2 1S
0 (2s2p
1P
1) 8
j
DR
rate
coeffic
ient (1
0-8 c
m3 s
-1)
Electron-ion collision energy (eV)
2s2p 3P
0 (2p
2 3P
1) 8
j
D. Bernhardt et al., in preparation
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 24
Time dependence of 3P0 DR resonance strength
D. Bernhardt et al., JPCS (in print)
Measurement of the E1M1 two-photon transition rate should be feasible
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 25
Comparison with theory
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
1010
1011
month
decade
millennium
second
minute
hour
century
year
Lifetim
e (
s)
Nuclear charge
E1M1
[Laughlin, PLA 75, 199 (1980)]
dayour
preliminary
value
nonrelativistic theory
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 26
Summary
Hyperfine-induced (HFI) transitions have specific applications
- accurate atomic clocks
- astrophysics: isotope specific abundances
HFI 2s2p 3P02s2 1S0 transition in Be-like ions
- does not compete with any other one-photon transition
First laboratory experiments with Be-like ions in a storage ring
- comparision of measurements with two istopes
- lifetimes determined with 5% accuracy
- 47Ti18+: 20% discrepancy with recent theoretical results
- 33S12+: Agreement with recent theoretical results
- in the future determination of nuclear magnetic moments?
E1M1 two-photon transition rate
- measurements will be pursued for heavy Be-like ions at the ESR
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 27
Collaborators & Funding
TSR - HFI transitions
D. Bernhardt, A. Müller, D. Yu
IAMP, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
M. Lestinsky
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung
M. Hahn, O. Novotný, D. W. Savin
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York
M. Grieser, C. Krantz, D. A. Orlov, R. Repnow, and A. Wolf
MPI für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany
ESR – E1M1 transitions
D. Bernhardt, S. Böhm, J Jacobi, S Kieslich, H Knopp, P. H. Mokler, A. Müller, W. Shi
IAMP, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
F. Bosch, C. Brandau, C. Kozhuharov, F. Nolden, M. Steck, T. Stöhlker
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung
Z. Stachura
Instytut Fizyki Jadrowej, Krakow
Z. Harman
MPI für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany
F. Fratini, S. Fritzsche, A. Surzhykov
Physikalisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg
Stefan Schippers, ICAMDATA 8, Gaithersburg, September 30 - October 4, 2012 28