Visiting address:Visiting address:Visiting address:Visiting address:

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Room H12-05

Burgemeester Oudlaan 50

Postal address:Postal address:Postal address:Postal address:

Room H12-07

Er zijn misschien belangrijkere dingen, maar mobiliteit raakt ons allemaal. Volgens stemwij-zer.nl verschillen de verkie-zingsprogramma’s van de poli-tieke partijen voor wat betreft mobiliteit slechts ten aanzien van de volgende twee vragen: “Mag Schiphol groeien?” en “Moeten meer wegen aange-legd worden?” De linkse partij-en PvdA, SP en Groen Links beantwoorden beide vragen negatief, terwijl de rechtse partijen CDA, VVD en Groep Wilders positief antwoorden.

Feit is dat de groei van lucht-vracht voor meer dan 95% gecorreleerd is aan economi-sche groei. Deze luchtvracht wordt vooral vervoerd in de buik van passagiersvliegtui-gen. Een ander feit is dat de belastinginkomsten van auto-mobiliteit de veroorzaakte maatschappelijke kosten voor infrastructuur, milieu, en onge-vallen met ongeveer 2 miljard euro overschrijden. De vraag is dan wat de linkse partijen beweegt: cliëntelisme? Links lijkt de voorkeur te geven aan de beautyslaapjes van Gooi-sche vrouwen en BN-ers in hun stulpjes aan het Naardermeer, in plaats van de forensen uit Almere die elke ochtend in een wolk van uitlaatgassen vast-staan op de A9. Zelfs de aan-leg van een tunnel is voor links niet acceptabel om het filepro-bleem rond Amsterdam te verlichten.

Het verschil van 2 miljard is gelijk aan de totale exploitatie-bijdragen van de overheid aan

het openbaar vervoer, dat de linkse partijen gratis willen maken voor ouderen en jonge-ren. Om ouderen niet te stig-matiseren, koppelt de PvdA de

invoering van gratis openbaar vervoer aan de introductie van de OV-chipkaart. Het probleem is echter niet zozeer dat gratis OV ouderen stigmatiseert, maar dat ouderen het OV stig-matiseren als mobiliteit waarin je niet in de kracht van je le-ven gevonden wil worden. Met een beetje creativiteit wordt dit inkoppen voor de auto-industrie, en kopen we dade-lijk in Nederland meer auto’s dan ooit tevoren. Je zou bijna denken dat de auto- en oliein-dustrie de partijkas van linkse partijen spekt.

In het kader van mobiliteit is de populistische roep van

Geert Wilders voor meer we-gen, geen rekening rijden, afschaffing van trajectcontro-les en verhoging van de maxi-

mum snelheid nog progressie-ver dan links. Maar als ik toch moet kiezen voor een verant-woord mobiliteitsbeleid, dan wordt het CDA of VVD. Een

plezierige bijkomstigheid is dat beide partijen niet tornen aan de hypotheekaftrek. En als ik dadelijk in mijn nieuwe huis woon, en geniet van een lek-ker glas wijn, ga ik bedenken hoe ik me kan inzetten voor het beperken van het sluipver-keer in mijn wijk en het be-houd van de authentieke moe-rasnatuur in de naburige Pol-der Schieveen. Het kan natuur-lijk niet zo zijn dat Zestienho-ven, de A13, de A20, en vooral de geplande verlenging van de A16 naar de A13 ten koste gaan van dit unieke stukje Hollands landschap, en….mijn nachtrust!

Mr. Dr. Peran van Reeven

Meer over de verkiezingen op Meer over de verkiezingen op Meer over de verkiezingen op Meer over de verkiezingen op pagina 6...pagina 6...pagina 6...pagina 6...

Typically Dutch: Typically Dutch: Typically Dutch: Typically Dutch: StemmingmakerijStemmingmakerijStemmingmakerijStemmingmakerij

Study Association Transito

November 20th 2006

Volume 6, Issue 1

InTrans

Current events:

• Elections

• Holidays (Christmas)

• Dubai 2007

Inside this issue:

Coverstory: Typically Dutch

2

From the editors 2

From the Board 2

Gateway2Europe 4

Living in a car free city

5

Column: Maarten van der Westen

6

Annabel’s Corner 8

Port Day report 7

Floris Geldof

Jeroen van Haaren

dance group and also part of a commission that organizes activities for the younger people in my church. Furthermore, I am an assisting teacher in Gymnastics for the young-talented gymnasts in my city, which is very nice to do. No more room to mention all my other activities, but for sure Transito will be a great part of it this year and I’m sure it will bring lots of pleasure to me and hopefully also to the other members of Transito.

The courses of the first trimester have come to an end, the Harbor day is already a few weeks ago, and still I was asked to introduce myself. Hopefully most of you know me by now, either by face or by name. A little bit about myself: I’m Karin and currently 21 years old and living in Maarssen. I did the bachelor Economics at Erasmus last three years and now I started my master UPT. Besides studying and Transito, I am involved in another board: I am chairman of a small

A new academic year, a

new master, a new job or

extra curricular activity or in

short a complexly new

adventure; that was what

awaited us in September

2006. ‘Extra curricular

activity? Say what?’

‘Extra curricular activities’

or in layman’s terms

everything related to, but

not part of your studies. Or

in our case making sure

this InTrans arrives on your

doorstep.

How fitting is it indeed that

this InTrans is also

completely new, ready to

stand up to your

scrutinizing and criticism. It

is now your job as our loyal

reader to evaluate whether

we have succeeded in

making yet again a better,

new and improved InTrans.

It is therefore our sincerest

hope that this InTrans, like

every issue published

before, will interest, inform

and entertain you and

furthermore that it will be

worthy of your scarce time…

Floris Geldof

Jeroen van Haaren

Editors InTrans 2006-2007

From the EditorsFrom the EditorsFrom the EditorsFrom the Editors

From the board From the board From the board From the board ---- Secretary Secretary Secretary Secretary

The Transito Board 2006-2007 From left to right: Karin, Sanne, Daan, Annabel In front: Jaymi

During my bachelor studies I spend a semester at the University of Bologna in Italy and that was really the highlight of my student life so far. In Tilburg I have always been an active member of a study association and I was a part of the conference committee and the lustrum committee. When I came to the Erasmus University I

thought it would be nice to join an organisation again, and Transito seemed like a nice organisation to become part of. In October the 19th board of Transito started, with 5 enthusiastic board members and we are planning to have a great year, full of nice and interesting activities for the students of the major and master UPTE.

From the board From the board From the board From the board ---- Chair(wo)man Chair(wo)man Chair(wo)man Chair(wo)man

My name is Sanne de Jong, I am 22 years old and I am the chairman of Transito 06-07. I was born in a village close to Rotterdam, but I am living in Tilburg for 4,5 years now. I have a bachelor in International Business from Tilburg University and I am currently a Master student of Urban, Port and Transport Economics.

“we are planning

to have a great

year, full of nice

and interesting

activities”

Page 2 InTrans

My name is Jaymi Chung

and I’m a master student in

Urban, Port and

Transport Economics. I

started my study

International Business and

Management Studies at the

Inholland in Rotterdam.

After my propedeuse I

went to the Erasmus

University for the Bachelor

study Economics.

Last year I was an active

member in the study

association AEclipse for the

International Research

Project 2006 as

commissioner Research &

Program.

Besides the incredible time

we had in Brazil, I have also

learned a lot from my

committee.

By joining the Transito

board 2006 - 2007 I hope

to develop further my

organizing and social skills.

Together with Willemien de

Jong and Eric van

den Berg we are organizing

the study trip 2006-2007

with the destination

Dubai. We are really excited

about Dubai!

I really look forward to a

great year together with my

fellow board members

and try to make a

tremendous and successful

year!

See you at our

activities!

From the board From the board From the board From the board ---- External Affairs External Affairs External Affairs External Affairs

and company were kind of nice but in the long term I saw myself not very happy over there. I decided to go for a masers degree and left the firm. After one year in the "schakeljaar" commuting between Amsterdam, where i live, and Rotterdam, where the EUR is, I am planning and sure that i will finish this year.

For this year I have a

couple of plans. First of all

finish my Masters degree.

But in relation to Transito I

have more than one. First

of all I would like to make

the activities

multidisciplinary. So for

those who are interested in

port or urban or transport. I

also hope to be able to

connect Transito more with

the exchange students.

When you have suggestions

or something to say about

the activities of Transito

please contact me.

+31624754968.

From the board From the board From the board From the board ---- Activities Activities Activities Activities My name is Daan Weijsenborn. I am a member of the board of Transito and the only male of the board. I don’t know why that is but i am determined to find out!

I am 26 years old, and after i finished my bachelor’s degree I decided to start working as a Account Manager for a large software house. This was not very wise because i found out that selling van not very difficult and not very challenging. The job

University, I studied Management, Economics and Law at INHOLLAND Hogeschool. I received my bachelor degree in July last summer. Besides my new study, I am also very excited about my participation in the study

My name is Annabel de Jager and I am the treasurer of the Transito Study Association for the next college year. Now I am following the pre-master program of Urban, Port and Transport Economics. Before I came to Erasmus

association. I want to learn a lot for my personal goals, keep the financial status of the association healthy and participate in the organisation of multiple activities.

From the board From the board From the board From the board ---- Treasurer Treasurer Treasurer Treasurer

Page 3 Volume 6, Issue 1

Rotterdam Gateway2EuropeRotterdam Gateway2EuropeRotterdam Gateway2EuropeRotterdam Gateway2Europe

Say Rotterdam and you’ll hear ‘Supply Chain Management’. Indeed, Rotterdam is a gleaming pearl in the international crown called ‘Supply Chain Management’. The Netherlands are often called ‘the gateway to Europe’, a title that fills us with pride, and our pockets. But why is this title so important, and, more significant, can we keep it?

First of all, we need to regard the elements (nodes in the supply chain) that justify this title. The port of Rotterdam is an evident node, with direct (deep water, 78 ft) access to sea and for many carriers port of first call for Europe. Excellent connections make this port the interface between Europe and the rest of the world (ROW). At this moment, Rotterdam handles the largest share of containers destined for European destinations and is, together with Hamburg and Bremen, Germany‘s main port.

Second there is Schiphol, the fourth European airport and main hub for the combination KLM/Northwest and an important interface for travelers between the EU and the US. This vital, since traffic generates more traffic (assumed that capacity is abundant). By

grouping cargo (and passengers) unit costs can be reduced, which attracts even more traffic, it’s the old story of economics of scale, scope and density.

Companies funneling their products to the final customer via the Netherlands are ensured of, at least in theory, a fast and reliable handling of their cargo to and from important destinations.

The importance of all these ongoing 24/7 activities is enormous. Let us just regard a container. A container on itself hardly has any value for the inland GDP, but affiliate activities have. The vessel has to enter the port (port duties), has to be serviced (shipping agent, oil and food supply), the container has to be unloaded and stored (terminal handler, e.g. ECT). At this point numerous activities are generated, like stuffing and stripping, and repair. And don’t forget inland transport by road, rail and barge! Being Gateway to Europe is a position that is very precious for the Dutch economy, but how are the future prospects? Can we remain competitive?

The answer is a bitter no. I know that amongst you there are people who spend a huge amount of their time

on the road, to numerous destinations (hopefully many which are international, we have just seen that we have to promote the Netherlands in order to earn money!) but with one common factor: congestion. Just think of it: we are loosing soil because our politicians are so terribly dragging, it is sick making! What about innovations, what about the second Maasvlakte, what about optimizing the public transport system (the high speed link linking the North with the West is cancelled, no Zuiderzeelijn (yet))? Do we really want to have our nice country to be eliminated from the international field of competitiveness? It is horrible, a shame! We, young high potentials, need to raise our voice! It is our duty to close the lines and enforce new infrastructural facilities in order to ensure a well facilitated growth of current activities. Ask yourself the question, would you be happy to see such important logistic clusters disappear to Germany and France leaving us no more than a few price elastic crumbs of the large cake?

Jolle Jansma - Transito Board

Entry to the port of Rotterdam

Page 4 InTrans

Transito hereby congratulates Maria Lampri and Stella Georgiou Transito hereby congratulates Maria Lampri and Stella Georgiou Transito hereby congratulates Maria Lampri and Stella Georgiou Transito hereby congratulates Maria Lampri and Stella Georgiou

on winning the first prize in the 2006 Young Haven Debaton winning the first prize in the 2006 Young Haven Debaton winning the first prize in the 2006 Young Haven Debaton winning the first prize in the 2006 Young Haven Debat

...I don’t think

this won’t be a

possibility for most

cities at least for

the next 10-20

years....

Traffic congestion is a problem in most cities of the world. Just to mention some data, in 2003in the US, congestion caused 3.7 billion hours of travel delay and 8.7 billion litres of wasted fuel, for a total cost of more than $63 billion for the year. The negative externalities of congestion, mainly pollution and delay, are well-known problems to anyone lives in an urban area.

Every year the EU organises the European Mobility Week, a full week of events dedicated to sustainable mob i l i t y . The mos t important of these events is the ‘car free day’ or ‘in town without my car’ campaign. During this day all cars are banned from the city centre of the participating towns. The campaign has mainly the aim to encourage the use of alternative forms of transport other than private ca rs and to ra ise awareness of what is at stake so far as concerns sustainable mobility in towns.

Many cities in Europe participate in this event and most of the people are very positive about this initiative. Nevertheless the question remains: is it really possible to live in a car-free city? Are people ready to give up their cars for their daily

activities? Our society heavily relies on motorized vehicles to move people and goods. In and around urban areas most of the people use the car to move and the almost totality of goods are delivered by motorized vehicles. Is it really possible to abandon this long-established way of living and working and shift to an idyllic car-free city? Honestly I don’t think this won’t be a possibility for most cities at least for the next 10-20 years. Some even argue that traffic c ong es t i o n i s evidence of social and econom ic vitality and that we must accept the f a c t t h a t automobiles are c e n t r a l t o metropolitan life. Probably they are right, but this doesn’t prevent us to try to stimulate people to move by more sustainable modes of transport. There are many possible policy measures: from the provision of showers in office building to stimulate bike commuting to the introduction of c onges t i on cha rg ing schemes to reduce car use in urban areas; from the provision of gratis public t r a n s p o r t t o t h e introduction of restrictive

parking measures in cities. Probably what we are still missing is commitment: not only from policy makers but also from people. Maybe people are not concerned about congestion; or maybe they are, but they are not willing to refrain from the comfort of their cars; or maybe they think that sooner or later, in one way or the other, something will change. Maybe they are wrong.

G. Mingardo

Notes: 1. Source: http://

www.citymayors.com/transport/congestion_usa.html (November 2006).

2. Have a look at this webpage http://

www.carfree.com/ to have an idea of how (and if) would be possible to

live in a car-free city.

Living in a carLiving in a carLiving in a carLiving in a car----free city: is that possible?free city: is that possible?free city: is that possible?free city: is that possible?

Car free city center in Sienna Italy

Page 5 Volume 6, Issue 1

Transito hereby congratulates Maria Lampri and Stella Georgiou Transito hereby congratulates Maria Lampri and Stella Georgiou Transito hereby congratulates Maria Lampri and Stella Georgiou Transito hereby congratulates Maria Lampri and Stella Georgiou

on winning the first prize in the 2006 Young Haven Debaton winning the first prize in the 2006 Young Haven Debaton winning the first prize in the 2006 Young Haven Debaton winning the first prize in the 2006 Young Haven Debat

Binnenkort moeten we ons massaal weer richting stem-bus slepen om een nieuw kabi-net te kiezen. Alle politieke partijen komen weer naar vo-ren met hun meningen en plannen. Het vrachtverkeer wordt in deze plannen regel-matig genoemd. Er zijn een aantal kwesties waarin het wegverkeer een rol speelt: het fileprobleem, het milieu en de toestroom van vele Oost-Europese chauffeurs zijn hete hangijzers.

Groen Links heeft een interes-sante passage in zijn partijpro-gramma staan: “De transport-sector en zeven miljoen perso-nenauto’s veroorzaken verre-weg het grootste deel van de uitstoot van broeikasgassen in Nederland. Daar bovenop ko-

men nog eens de gigantische kosten voor uit-breiding van het wegennet, en het menselijk leed en de kos-ten die het ge-volg zijn van verkeersonge-lukken.”

Nederland is al sinds mensen-heugenis een

handel- en transportnatie. Vele mensen in dit land hebben werk dankzij transport en dis-tributie. Maar voor Groen Links telt dit blijkbaar niet. Zij zien vrachtwagens alleen als grote milieuonvriendelijke monsters. Dat alle gebruiksartikelen en voedingsmiddelen in dit land altijd op een bepaald moment door een vrachtwagen zijn vervoerd, maakt een vrachtwa-gen blijkbaar niet nuttig. Dat honderdduizenden mensen dankzij het vervoer een baan hebben in dit land, is blijkbaar ook niet belangrijk.

Persoonlijk vraag ik me af hoe Groen Links campagne voert

voor de verkiezingen. Waar andere partijen mooie posters en folders hebben, mag Groen Links dit niet gebruiken na-tuurlijk. Denk aan de kilome-ters die vrachtwagens moeten afleggen om dat promotiema-teriaal over het hele land te verspreiden! Dat wordt veel fietsen voor mevrouw Halse-ma.

Groen Links, en alle politieke partijen met hen, kan beter eens zijn kop uit het zand ha-len, en erkennen dat Neder-land niet zonder vrachtverkeer kan. Net zomin als de rest van de wereld. Vrachtwagens zijn nodig, omdat het vaak de bes-te, snelste en heel vaak de enige manier is om goederen van A naar B te krijgen. Im-mers, niet elke winkel of huis heeft een spoorlijn of een ka-naal voor de deur. Vrachtwa-gens zijn noodzakelijk!

De politiek moet voor de ver-andering eens kijken naar alle ontwikkelingen die het vracht-verkeer heeft doorgemaakt in de afgelopen jaren. Zijn ze niet van Euro-0 begin jaren negen-tig naar Euro-5 gegaan, een enorme ontwikkeling waarbij uitlaatgassen heel veel minder schadelijk zijn geworden? Ver-gelijk de uitstoot per kilogram lading maar eens met een personenauto. Vrachtwagens zijn tegenwoordig zelfs scho-ner dan trein of schip. Het zijn toch alleen vrachtwagens die uitgerust zijn met SCR (Selective Cathalystic Reduction, AdBlue) en EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) om schadelijke stoffen in uit-laatgassen te reduceren? Kwam de transportbranche zelf niet met milieuvriendelijke plannen zoals de LZV’s?

Soms lijkt het wel alsof een beter milieu niet meer het doel is. Nee, het gaat om minder vrachtwagens en personenau-to’s op de weg. Het maakt niet

uit hoeveel plannen er vanuit de transportbranche komen om schade aan het milieu te voorkomen. Zolang niet een groot deel van de vrachtwa-gens van de weg verdwijnt, wordt er niet naar de plannen geluisterd. Men staart zich blind op de hoeveelheid voer-tuigen op de weg.

Het is voorspeld dat het weg-vervoer in 2010 zal zijn ver-dubbeld ten opzichte van van-daag. De Europese Unie heeft dit eindelijk erkent, en men heeft ingezien dat hun recla-mecampagne voor de “modal split”, waardoor al het over-heidsgeld naar spoor en water gingen, niets uithaalt. De Euro-pese Unie heeft begrepen dat het veel beter is voor het mili-eu en de economie om te in-vesteren in het wegvervoer, zodat al die vrachtwagens niet meer in de file staan te ron-ken. Zonder twijfel werkt dit beter dan geld steken in spoor-lijnen die toch nauwelijks wor-den gebruikt.

Misschien wordt het eens tijd dat ook Groen Links zijn ogen eens opent. Dit geldt ook voor de andere politieke partijen. Er worden legio goede plannen aangedragen door fabrikanten van vrachtwagens en door de transportbranche zelf. Wellicht zou het realistischer zijn om deze plannen eens te bekijken en om mee te werken deze plannen uit te voeren. Ik durf te wedden dat dit veel beter is voor het milieu dan alleen maar met vingers te wijzen. Zolang het enige échte doel van de politiek is om het aan-tal voertuigen op de weg dras-tisch te verminderen, zal het milieu niet gebaad zijn. Zonder transport staat immers écht alles stil!

(bij het schrijven van dit stuk is het milieu in generlei wijze aangetast)

Groen Links, Vrachtverkeer rechtsGroen Links, Vrachtverkeer rechtsGroen Links, Vrachtverkeer rechtsGroen Links, Vrachtverkeer rechts De politiek moet

voor de verandering

eens kijken naar alle

ontwikkelingen die het

vrachtverkeer heeft

doorgemaakt in de

afgelopen jaren

Page 6 InTrans

Once upon the time there was

a famous port: the Port of

Rotterdam. It survived wars,

political and social changes

that even made it become

larger and more powerful.

Surely it has to be seen with

your own eyes to realize its

true meaning. This is the main

reason why a group of

university students went to the

port, last October and I was

one of them. Being an

exchange student, for me the

image of the Port of Rotterdam

is indisputable. In my country

of origin, Poland, we have

always known its strong

position and it leader status.

That is why I was excited about

the trip to the port. I went

there with the idea of seeing

cranes, huge docks and many

big vessels. First we were

taken to the logistic company

“Schenker”, where we enjoyed

a company presentation. It

was clear that it has nothing to

do with the port per sé, but the

large warehouse area held by

Schenker is filled with the

cargo commodities either to be

put on ships or to be unloaded.

Something that made me a

little sentimental was that one

of the warehouses from

Schenkel was half filled up

with famous and tasty Polish

beer “Zywiec”. I found out that

the connections between

Poland and The Netherlands

are higher that I expected

them to be. The second part of

the trip was a sightseeing tour

of the refinery “Exxon”. We

were all amazed by the sheer

size of the refinery, its

potential for working 24/7 and

the industrial plants there

resembling the Lego bricks toy.

The Exxon Refinery has its own

dedicated terminal where the

big vessels full of crude oil are

arriving. The trip around the

refinery area took us more

than an hour and that by the

bus (!), so I did not even want

to imagine walking around on

foot…it was somehow excited

for me seeing something like

Texas in the miniature. The

whole excursion to the port

took us all day, but it provided

us with the opportunity to see

the port, the real port not like

one on a postcards. It also

brought up the thoughts that

port is not anymore just a

transport node, indeed it

encompasses more economic

activities around the core port

that mutually influence each

other for the instant growth.

Port of Rotterdam nowadays

s t r u g g l e s w i t h ma n y

competitors but there is hardly

one similar with the particular

atmosphere like the port

keeps and spreads.

Kasia Kurek

Masters student Urban,

Port and Transport

Economics

Port Day ReportPort Day ReportPort Day ReportPort Day Report I found out that

the connections

between Poland

and The

Netherlands are

higher than I

expected them to

be.

Page 7 Volume 6, Issue 1

ColofonColofonColofonColofon

Redactie Floris Geldof

Jeroen van Haaren

intransredactie@gmail.com

Visiting Address Erasmus University Rotterdam

Room H12-05

Burgemeester Oudlaan 50

Postal Address Study Association Transito

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Room H12-07

P.O. box 1738

3000 DR ROTTERDAM

Tel.: 010-4082070

Fax.: 010-4089156

www.transito.nu

Study Association Transito

am just following lectures, am reading my books and learning for my exams. That setting is different to participate in and I had to change my way of learning. For the first time in two years, I am actually reading whole books. There is no need for deadlines and therefore also no hurry in the last week.

Students are also different. In University, there is a bigger so called ‘students-life’ and a lower willing to put time and energy in extra activities and appointments. On the other hand, they are also more serious about their lives and carrier perspectives; the people I have met in this short period.

On this moment I can conclude that one education form is no better or worse that the other,

Annabel de Jager will provide a Annabel de Jager will provide a Annabel de Jager will provide a Annabel de Jager will provide a column here on a regular column here on a regular column here on a regular column here on a regular basis starting with this issue of basis starting with this issue of basis starting with this issue of basis starting with this issue of the InTransthe InTransthe InTransthe InTrans

Before I went to University, I have studied at INHOLLAND Hogeschool, as you may have read before in this magazine. I have been really excited to come to a new surrounding, a new setting and new education. Some people told me studying at a University would be quiet different than the last years at INHOLLAND. I did not know what to expect, but thought it was a logical next step and would be very much the same. I was wrong.

My former study was more practical. We had to cooperate with each other, wrote many papers, were focused on the real life and the literature just helped to understand. Now I

but it is different. Students are thinking differently (of course this is the meaning of the school) but also the way of given education is not the same. Therefore I also changed the way of learning and studying. I am very excited about my exams, which will start on November 20th. So I am studying a lot at the moment; I hope you do that as well.

Good luck at your exams!

Annabel’s corner

Study Association for Urban, Port and Transport Economics

Your advertisement here?Your advertisement here?Your advertisement here?Your advertisement here? Contact Jaymi ChungContact Jaymi ChungContact Jaymi ChungContact Jaymi Chung

Email: extern@transito.nuEmail: extern@transito.nuEmail: extern@transito.nuEmail: extern@transito.nu

Tel: +31 (0) 6 248 728 67Tel: +31 (0) 6 248 728 67Tel: +31 (0) 6 248 728 67Tel: +31 (0) 6 248 728 67