ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in...

28
ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT for the PHOBOS Collaboration ICHEP 2002 July 24-31, 2002, Amsterdam

Transcript of ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in...

Page 1: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Scaling of Charged Hadron pT distributions in

Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

Gerrit van NieuwenhuizenMIT

for the PHOBOS Collaboration

ICHEP 2002July 24-31, 2002, Amsterdam

Page 2: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Collaboration

ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORYBirger Back, Alan Wuosmaa

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY Mark Baker, Donald Barton, Alan Carroll, Nigel George, Stephen Gushue, George Heintzelman, Burt Holzman, Robert Pak, Louis Remsberg, Peter Steinberg, Andrei Sukhanov

INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS, KRAKOWAndrzej Budzanowski, Roman Hołyński, Jerzy Michałowski, Andrzej Olszewski, Pawel Sawicki, Marek Stodulski, Adam Trzupek, Barbara Wosiek, Krzysztof Woźniak

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYMaartin Ballintijn, Wit Busza (Spokesperson), Patrick Decowski, Kristjan Gulbrandsen, Conor Henderson, Jay Kane, Judith Katzy, Piotr Kulinich, Jang Woo Lee, Heinz Pernegger, Corey Reed, Christof Roland, Gunther Roland, Leslie Rosenberg, Pradeep Sarin, Stephen Steadman, George Stephans, Carla Vale, Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen, Gábor Veres, Robin Verdier, Bernard Wadsworth, Bolek Wysłouch

NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, TAIWANChia Ming Kuo, Willis Lin, Jaw-Luen Tang

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGORussell Betts, Edmundo Garcia, Clive Halliwell, David Hofman, Richard Hollis, Aneta Iordanova, Wojtek Kucewicz, Don McLeod, Rachid Nouicer, Michael Reuter, Joe Sagerer

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDAbigail Bickley, Richard Bindel, Alice Mignerey,

Marguerite Belt Tonjes

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERJoshua Hamblen, Erik Johnson, Nazim Khan, Steven Manly, Inkyu Park, Wojtek Skulski, Ray Teng, Frank Wolfs

Page 3: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

The PHOBOS Apparatus

• 1 Layer 4 Multiplicity Array• Octagonal Barrel + Annular Rings

• 16 Layer 2-Arm Spectrometer

Trigger & Centrality• Paddle Counters• ZDCs

137000 Si Pad Channels

Page 4: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

The PHOBOS Spectrometer

z

x

y

70 cm 10cm • Outer layers situated in 2T magnetic field

• High segmentation in bending direction

• Tracking within 10 cm of interaction point

• Coverage near mid-rapidity

• Phi acceptance of 3% per Arm

Page 5: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

• Spectra corrected for • Acceptance/Efficiency• Ghost Tracks • Momentum resolution • Variable bin width• Secondaries

• At 200 GeV min. bias. pp reference data exists

PHOBOS-Spectra @ 200GeV

_

0.2<y<1.4

Page 6: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

• Production of high pT particles dominated by hard scattering

• High pT yield prop. to Ncoll

(binary collision scaling)

• Compare to pp spectra scaled up by Ncoll

• Violation of Ncoll scaling observed at 130GeV(PHENIX/STAR publications)

• Jet quenching?

Comparing Au+Au and pp Spectra 1_

_Au+Au

Page 7: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Charged Particle Production

Total multiplicity scales with Npart

Total Multiplicity

Preliminary

from Peter Steinbergs talk

Page 8: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Comparing Au+Au and pp Spectra 2_

Page 9: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Scaled Spectra / pp-Fit

• Centrality range: • <b> from 10 to 3 fm• <> from 3 to 6

_

Centrality Npart

45-50% 65 ± 4

35-45% 93 ± 5

25-35% 138 ± 6

15-25% 200 ± 8

6-15% 276 ± 9

0-6% 344 ± 12

PHOBOS Preliminary

Page 10: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

• Shape differs from pp already at Npart = 65

• Moderate change from Npart = 65 to Npart =344

Scaled Spectra / pp-Fit _

_

PHOBOS Preliminary

Page 11: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Centrality scaling in pT bins

UA1 200 GeV

Rel

ativ

e Y

ield

Spectra normalized to yield at Npart = 65Npart

Page 12: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Npart scaling describes data at pT = 4.25 GeV/c

Normalized to yield at Npart = 65

Npart Scaling at high pT

Ncoll-scaling

PHOBOS Preliminary

Page 13: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Evolution with Centrality

• Follow change of shape vs most peripheral bin

• Dominantly participant scaling

• Violated by about 30% for most central collisions

PHOBOS

Page 14: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

• Measured h+,- pT spectra in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions• pT range: 0.2 < pT < 5 GeV/c

• Rapidity range: 0.2 < y< 1.4

• Centrality range: 65 < Npart < 344

• Data show:• Substantial difference in spectral shape between pp and

peripheral Au+Au (Npart ~ 65)

• Minor change from 65 to 344 participants

• Even at pT of 4 – 5 GeV/c, Npart -scaling from peripheral to central Au+Au

Summary

_

Page 15: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Page 16: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Comparison to Lower Energies

• Data taken at 130GeV shows similar trends

• Shape is consistent with measurements by STAR R

elat

ive

Yie

ld

Page 17: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

How to compare spectra to pp?

• Observations:• Mid-rapidity multiplicity compatible with two

component model

• Total multiplicity shows Npart scaling

• How do spectra scale with centrality? • Does scaling change over the pT range?

• Crucial for physics interpretation

_

Page 18: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

_pp

Au+Au

19.6 GeVpreliminary

130 GeV

200 GeV

Two Component Model:

Charged Particle Production Central Density

Data from PRC 65 061901R (2002)

collpppartpp NxnNnxd

dN )1(

= N

co

ll/(

Np

art/2

)

Page 19: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Number of collisions at different Energies

inel=42 mb(RHIC)

Glauber Monte Carlo

inel=33 mb (SPS)

inel=21 mb (AGS)

Page 20: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Integrated Yields vs Centrality

dN/d - Multiplicity data

dN/dy – Spectra Integral

Page 21: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Mean pT vs centrality

Page 22: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Centrality scaling in pT bins

UA1 200 GeV

Rel

ativ

e Y

ield

Spectra normalized to FIT to yield at Npart = 65Npart

Page 23: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

CorrectionsG

ho

st f

ract

ion

pT [GeV/c] pT [GeV/c]

pT [GeV/c]

Page 24: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Systematic Errors

Page 25: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Triggering on Interactions

t (ns)

Eve

nts

Negative

Paddles

Positive Paddles

ZDC N

ZDC PAu Au

x

z

PPPN

ValidCollision

• Coincidence between

Paddle counters• Paddle + ZDC timing reject

background

Page 26: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Centrality Determination

Data

Paddle signal

Nparticipants

Data+MC

HIJING +GEANT Glauber calculation Model of paddle triggerPeripheral

b

Central

b

2

4

6

x 2

Page 27: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Particle Tracking In Spectrometer1. Road-following algorithm

finds straight tracks in

field-free region

2. The curved tracks in B-

field found by clusters in

(1/p, ) space

3. Find match of straight

and curved by ,

consistency in dE/dx and

fit in yz-plane

4. Covariance matrix track

fit for momentum

reconstruction and ghost

rejection

x10 cm

1

2

By

z

Bea

m

Page 28: ICHEP 2002, AmsterdamGerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT Scaling of Charged Hadron p T distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen MIT.

ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen/MIT

Spectrometer Performance

Data Sample Production Run 2001(200 GeV)• 7.8 M Au+Au Events, Min. Bias Trigger• 32 M reconstructed particles

Acceptance Momentum Resolution