Benyiahia Hebbar, A079 374 882 (BIA Jun. 11, 2012)

8/12/2019 Benyiahia Hebbar, A079 374 882 (BIA Jun. 11, 2012)

1/9

HEBBAR, BENYIAHIAA079-374-882P.O. BOX 6300FLORENCE, 85132

Name: EBBAR BENYAA

epartment of ustice

Executive Oce r Immigation Reiew

Board of Immigation AppealsOce o the Clek

107 Leebu Pike Suite 2000Fls Crc Vinia 2204

S/CE Oice of Chief Counsel - FLOP0 Box 2558Phoenix, 85002

A079-374-882

Date of this notice: 6/11/2012

Encosed s a copy of the Boad's decision and ode n he above-eenced case.

nclosure

Pane Members:Gree Anne J.Mllan Hgh GPaey Roge

Sinceely,

Donna CarrChief Clerk

Cite as: Benyiahia Hebbar, A079 374 882 (BIA Jun. 11, 2012)

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished


2/9

/U.S Deparent of JusticeExecutive Oce r Iigation Review

Fas Chh irga 221Fie: A079 374 882 - lorence, A

re: BENY EBBR aka Ben Hebb

I MOVL PROCEEDGS

APEA

ON BELF O SPOENT: Pro se

ON BEHAL O HS:

CARGE:

io A. MooodAssisat Chief Counsel

Decisio of the Bod ofmigaion Appeals

Date: JUN 11 20Z

Notice: Sec 237(a)(2)(A)(iii), I&N Act [8 USC 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii)] -Convicted of aggavated felony

Lodge: Sec 237(a)(2)(A)(ii), &N Act 8 USC 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii)] -Convicted of two or more cimes involving moral urpide

PPLICAON Teinatio

e espondet appeals om an miatio Judge's Jan 18, 202, decision ordeing hiemoved om te Ute States The epent of Hoeland Secui (DHS") opposes theappeal he record will be remded

e respondent, a naive d citize of rance a lawl peaent resident of theUnited States, has wo convictios that e pertinent here: () a 200 convicion r atempted thein volatio of Nev Rev Stat 193330 d 2050832, r wich he was sentenced to 2 monthsin jail (Exh 5, tab D); d (2) a 201 conviction r the in violatio of Nev Rev Stat 200832,

r which he w setenced to 120 days in jail (Exh , tab G)

eded oice to aea ha was iitialy led i October 20 e DS alleed at eesodes 200 conviction renders him deorabe as an alie coviced of aaaed feloy,amely, attemped the oese r which he e of psonmet is at least ye Sections101(a)(43)(G), 01(a)(43)(U), d 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Immatio d Natioali Act, 8 USC 101(a)(43)(G), 10 l (a)(43)(U), 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) (2006) The DHS also alleges that herespodes 2010 and 201 covictios, take togeher, reer him deportable as a alie convictedof o crmes involvi mora titude (IMT) not arising om a se scheme of crialmsconduct Secio 237(a)2)A)(ii of the Act The Immtion ude sstaied both charges d



3/9

,

934 882

dd th sndnt md but th sndnt has aald uing that th DHSs idncs nscint t ih chg th llwing asns w a with th sndnt

W dal st with th agaatd flny chg snc h xistnc f an agaatd flnycnictin wuld nd th sndnt bth mabl inligbl mst s f lif m

mal As ntd th sndnt w und mabl haing bn cnictd f atmtdth ns" agaatd lny und sctins 101(a)(43)(G) and 0(a)(43)(U) f th Act sndnt ds nt aa t disut that th g f cnduct unishabl as an attmt" dada law wud als quai as attmt" und sctin 10(a)(43)(U) f th Act thus wcnn u discussin t whh th cim hat w th bjct f th sndnts attmt is ath ns" und sctin 101(a)(43)(G)

T quali as a th ns" a cim must inl a taking f xcis f cn withut cnsnt d with th cimnal intnt t d th f th ghts and bntsf rshi n if such diatin is lss th ttal annt Matter of Gcia-adruga,24 I&N Dc 436 (BA 2008) Nadas th statut is sctually diisibl that is it dns h

isjunctily by fnc t aius ts f cnduct listd in 10 disct statuty subaraahs. R Stat 2050832()(a)(i) uth sral f ths 0 subaahs a in didd int sat clauss ach f which dscribs a uniqu t f cnduct My f th acts

scibd by 2050832 wud quali as gnic th nss" und sctin 10(a)(43)() but statut als crs actssuch as th f sics th by aud assng an icint-ndschckat d nt s uali See N R Stat 2050832(1)(c) ( (g) (i) see alsoHuertaGuevara v Ashcro 321 3d 883 88 (9th Ci 2003) (hlding that th f sics is nta gnic th ns") Mater ofGarciaadruga supra (hlding at h by aud dcnis nt a gnic h ns")

As 205832 cs sm cims hat quali as th nss" and ths that d nt thsndnts agaatd flny cag c ny b sustaind if th Immiatin udg dtminsun cnsidan f adissib ins f th cnictn cd that th sndnts ns fcnictn includd all th lmnts f a gnric t ns" E.g VerdugoGoalez v older,581 3d 1059 106061 (9 Ci 2009) H th mmiatin udg sustind th sndntsaggaatd lny chag a cnsiding amng hings th naati in f aPsntnc nstigatin R (PSR") ar in anticiatin f th sndnts sntncingby th ada Dant f Pl and Pbatin (J at 3 Exh 5 tb ) Witn th juisdictinf th United Sats Cu f Aals th Nin Cicuit hw a PSR is not ng thdcumnts an mmiatin udg may cnsid und th mdid catgical" aach g

Reina-Rodriguez v United States 655 3d 1182 1191-92 (9th Ci 201)

As th Immiatin udg id in a un immissibl idnc t cnclud tat thsnnt as cnc f a gnc ns" un cagrca aac n usls unabl t a dcisin sustaining th aggaatd lny chg un t snt cd w cnt disc wht th Imiatin Judg wuld ha sustaind thatchag had sh cnnd h inqui t issibl idnc Accdingy w will acat thImmiatin udgs dcisin susainng th agaatd flny chg and mand th cd

2



4/9

f

A079374 882

We now to e muple CT cge under section 2(a)(2)(A)(ii) of he Act. e haveon held at e crimes CMTs only if e defendt necessiy intended eect apeent taking. Eg Matter of VZS 22 &N Dec. 18 16 n.12 (BA 2000); Maer ofGrley 1 I&N Dec. 0, (BA 197). Atoug Nev. Rev. Stat. 205.082 covers manyent akigs it aso encompses oenses in wic no-permanent takings (or even no takings

at a) were intended such as where property hat is awy possessed by agent o e oer isused r a pose beyond at auhorized by the agency reationship. See Nev. Rev. Stat 205.082(1)(b). te oenses r wich he respondent was convicted in 2010 d 2011 e notcategorica CMTs the secion 2(a)(2)(A)(ii) cge c ony be ssained if e respondent'sconviction records reect tat e entered guity pe to oenses in which peet kings werentended

The Immiation Judge deteined at e respondent's convction records reected conviconsr peent akings (.. at ) but we are unable to a at judet. concuding at terespondent's 2011 conviction was r oense involving a peent taking theImmiatio Judge ooked to e descripion of te oense set r in a crimina compaint which

cged him wit d larceny uder Nev. Rev. Stat. 205.220 (. Dec. at Eh. 5 b G) is undisputed owever that the reondet was not ultimately convicted of and lcey here wpeied to enter a pea to the lesser oense of te under 205 .082. te Nin Circuitaegations set r in a charging document may not be considered under he modied categoriapproac if he deendant ped guity to oense dierent om the one carged. Eg Ruilv Goales 4 F.d 102 109 (9th Cir. 2007); Cisneros-Pere v Goales, 65 Fd 86 9(9t Cir. 2006); artine-Pere v Gonzales 17 Fd 1022 1029 (t Cir 2005). TheImmition Judge was not peied to iner tat te respondent's the conviction was based onte same cs tat ad been aeged in support of he nd arceny cge. See Cisneros-Perev Gonzales supra at 9 As the Immition Judge exceeded te proper scope of he modiedcategorica approac we wi vacate her decision susainng te multipe CT cge d remand

he record.

I coclusion e Imiation Judge's removabili determinations are ot susanabe becausetey were bsed i p upo ipeissibe evidece Uder te circstces we wi susan he

respondet's appea vacate he miao Judge's decision and remand the maer on operecord r her consideration o te remova carges and r e en of a new decision atapplies te modied categorica approach in a mer consistet wth Nint Circuit requrements.

ORER: Te appea is sed, e Immiation Judge's decision is vacated d e recordis remded r er proceedigs cosistent wit the regoing opinion d r the en of a new

decision.



5/9

NITED STATES DEPRTMENT OF JSTIEEXETIVE OFIE OR IIGTION REVIEW

ITED STATES IMMIGRATION OURTORENE, AIZON

l: 0934-88 January 8, 01

In th Mattr o

BEIAHIA HEBBAR IN REMOVA PROEEDINGS

RESPONDET

RGES

APPIATIONS:

ON BEHAF O F RESPODT PRO SE

ON BEH O DHS DION MORWOOD

ORL DEISION O TE IIGRTION JGE

Th ntd Stats Govrnnt bgan ths cas aganst

th rsondnt by lng a otc to Apar datd August 9,

20. Th docunt was propry svd on th rspondnt on

Sptr 9, 011 In addton th ourt d an I-6 1

xhbt dd ctobr 0 and a scond I6 Exbt

3 datd ovbr 9 0 In procdngs bor th ourt on

Octobr 011 th rsondnt was gvn hs rghts advsas.


6/9

On that sa at th rsonnt adttd n th NA, Exhbt ,

allgatons 3 an 5. h Dartnt wthrw allgaton

4 an rac that wth algaton 4 aarng n th 6

Exhbt . n adton th Dartnt on January 0

wthrw th charg n th NA.

On January 5 0 th rsondnt adtt -6

xhbt allgaton 4 an h nd th charg thrn. On

that sa at January 5, 0 th rsondnt adttd 6

xhbt 3 algaton 6 and n th charg. n rocngs

bor th ourt hld on January 8 0 th rsonnt

contnu to ny th chargs. h ourt ound ursuant to th

noraton contan n Exhbt that th rsonnt ha n

act bn convctd o th cr o attt to cot tht n

volaton o Nvaa Rvs Statut 93.330 and h was sntnc

to rsonnt or onths lus robaton. h convcton

occurr on bruary 4 0 at ark ounty Nvaa strct

court. At Exhbt tabs through F w hav th judgnt o

convcton showng that ons or whch th rsonnt was

convct o attt to cot tht a catgory D lony/gross

sanor. At ag 8 w hav th crna noraton

ndcatng that th ons at s March 5, 009. h

noraton ncats that .. . rsonnt wthout awu

authorty an wthout authorzaton dd attt to cot tht

by convrtng akng an authorz transr o an ntrst n or

w thout authorzaton controlng rorty havng a valu o

A079-37488 January 8 0


7/9

-

$250 or moe lawful mony of the Unitd States belonging to the

victim a casio." Th psetce investigatio rport at pag

16 indicates that th respodnt went ito the casino that the

clerk who worked at th casino head someon mssing with th

cash rgiste and saw th rspondt clos the register drawr."

he vidence further idicats that the rspodt was obsrved

y a security surveillace camera takig the oey fom th

egister. Th rspondnt was susequetly cotacted through

investigation ad was dtrmind to hav committed the offense

The rspodent admitted havig comitted the offens to the

probatio officer.

As far as allation 6 agai at Exhibit 5 w have on

page 24 ta D, a criminal complaint charging the espodnt in

cot two with th crim of grand larcey. d the cout

idicates that th respondt did willfully ulawfully and

foiously with th intt to dpive the owr peranently

therof stal tak carry lead or drive away proprty ownd

by another having a vau of 250 or mor that property being a

laptop computer a computr modm unlawful money of the United

States" he Court furthr finds at page 22 that th rspodent

pl d to cout two amended theft. heeaft the videce

idicates that the respondet was adjudgd guilty of that crim

ad sntncd accordny h Court finds that the offeses

for which the respondt s chargd occurred on differet dates

there ar differnt victims differt proprty at issue ad

A079-374-82 3 Januay 1 202


8/9

hror hy ar wo spara crms. Th our fnds ha

hy ar cagorcal IMT's as hy boh ndca ha h

rspondn whou lawful auhory oo propry ha dd no

blong o h m and nndd o prmannly dpr h ownr

hrof. ccordngly h our wll susan h chargs

agans h rspondn Th rspondn s ound rmoabl Th

rspondn ndcad ha h Franc h counry of rmoal

Th rspondn ndcas h has no far of rurnng o Franc.

Th our fnds ha h rspondn has no rlf from

rmoably Accordngly s ordrd ha h rspondn s

ordrd rmod from h Unid Sas o Franc. Th

rspondn rsrs appal

Wi { R ELLOUnd Sas mmgraon Judg

A079-374-882 4 January 8 202


9/9

\

CERTIFICATE PAGE

I hereby certify that the attaced proceeding before JDGE

SILVIA R. ARELLNO, in the matter of:

BENYIAHIA HEBBAR

A079-374882

LORENCE ARIZONA

is an accurate verbatim tanscript of te recording as provided

by the Executive Office for Immigration Review and that tis is

te original transcript tereof for the file of te Executive

Office for Iigration evie

ANA LINTON (Transcriber)

DEPOSITION SERICES, Inc

MARCH 9 2012

Competion ate)

Benyiahia Hebbar, A079 374 882 (BIA Jun. 11, 2012)

Documents

Transcript of Benyiahia Hebbar, A079 374 882 (BIA Jun. 11, 2012)