Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for...

74
1 Proteomics status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for Klinisk Biokemi og Farmakologi, KBF Odense Universitets Hospital, OUH

Transcript of Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for...

Page 1: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

1

Proteomics – status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken

Lars Melholt Rasmussen

professor, overlæge

Afd. for Klinisk Biokemi og Farmakologi, KBF

Odense Universitets Hospital, OUH

Page 2: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

2

Page 3: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

3

Personlig medicin – proteomics status

Page 4: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

4

-Measurements of proteins are central in clinical medicine

(clin. biochem., microbiol., pathology, clin. immunol)

single markers

diagnosis: troponins, BNP, CRP etc

risk stratification (apolipoproteins, CRP)

monitoring drug effects (INR (factor II, VII, X)

multi markers

double testing (chrom. abberations)

elf-test (liver fibrosis)

MALDI-TOF identif. af bakteriekolonier

-Precision medicine needs more detailed phenotyping

ex: measurement of many proteins simultaneously (proteomics)

-Genomics is already estabished in research and routine

-So what is the status with clinical proteomics?

Proteinerne er her allerede!

Page 5: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

5

Clinical proteomics - status?

basics – potentials / challenges

methods / types

examples

1: current clin use:

amyloidosis diagnosis

2: recent promising research

athero-diagnostica

3: caution

treatment interference (heparin)

Page 6: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

DNA mRNA Protein

Gene

DNA

mRNA1

mRNA2

mRNA3

mRNA4

mRNA5

SplicingProtein1

Protein2

Protein3

Protein4

Protein5

Protein6

....

Proteini

Post-translationalprocessing

Genomics Transcriptomics Proteomics

Page 7: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Nucleic acids: Simple, uniform chemistry

Easy extraction & quantitation, complete sequencing,

Proteins: Heterogenous physical/ chemical properties

Extremely different concentrations

Proteomics

• Large-scale investigations

• Identity & quantity

• Proteins and modifications

Since 1980’s: 2D-gels

Now: LC-MSMS

multiplex binding assays

800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400m/z0

100

%

Page 8: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

8

Types of plasma proteomics – current state

Multiplex binding assays LC-MSMS (Mass spectrometry)

Types Immunoassays (antibody dependent)

Nucleic acid-binders (aptamers)

Discovery (data-dependent)

Targeted (predetermined, data-independent)

Advantages Easy to run many samples

High sensitivity

Large dynamic range

Not dependent of reagents

Specificity: very high

Identifies posttranslational modifications

Limitations Depends on antibodies or binders

Specificity is variable – often low

Interference: also from other analytes

when multiplexing

Ressource intensive (pre-analyt. and analyt.)

Sensitivity depends on physics of peptides,

sample and method

Which

proteins?

Most often defined by vendor:

OLINK (approx. 100)

Luminex (approx. 10 – 100)

SOMASCAN (approximat. 2000)

Discovery LC-MSMS

100 – 4000 proteins dependent on

method/instrument (not predetermined)

Targeted LC-MSM

1-100 predetermined

Page 9: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

9

Multiplex immunoassay - example

Page 10: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

10

Types of plasma proteomics – current state

Multiplex binding assays LC-MSMS (Mass spectrometry)

Types Immunoassays (antibody dependent)

Nucleic acid-binders (aptamers)

Discovery (data-dependent)

Targeted (predetermined, data-independent)

Advantages Easy to run many samples

High sensitivity

Large dynamic range

Not dependent of reagents

Specificity: very high

Identifies posttranslational modifications

Limitations Depends on antibodies or binders

Specificity is variable – often low

Interference: also from other analytes

when multiplexing

Ressource intensive (pre-analyt. and analyt.)

Sensitivity depends on physics of peptides,

sample and method

Which

proteins?

Most often defined by vendor:

OLINK (approx. 100)

Luminex (approx. 10 – 100)

SOMASCAN (approximat. 2000)

Discovery LC-MSMS

100 – 4000 proteins dependent on

method/instrument (not predetermined)

Targeted LC-MSM

1-100 predetermined

Page 11: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Workflow for LC-MSMS proteome analysis

nano-LC-MSMS

Plasma

Tissue

Mass spectra

Peptide sequence

Protein ident.

Bioinformatics

Nano-LC

SeparationIndividual

versus

Pools

Unbiased versus targeted Quantification-spectral counts

-labeled peptides

-isobaric labelling

Fragmentation:

Trypsination

Peptides

Extraction

Page 12: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

12

Types of plasma proteomics – current state

Multiplex binding assays LC-MSMS (Mass spectrometry)

Types Immunoassays (antibody dependent)

Nucleic acid-binders (aptamers)

Discovery (data-dependent)

Targeted (predetermined, data-independent)

Advantages Easy to run many samples

High sensitivity

Large dynamic range

Not dependent of reagents

Specificity: very high

Identifies posttranslational modifications

Low dynamic range

Limitations Depends on antibodies or binders

Specificity is variable – often low

Interference: also from other analytes

when multiplexing

Ressource intensive (pre-analyt. and analyt.)

Sensitivity depends on physics of peptides,

sample and method

Which

proteins?

Most often defined by vendor:

OLINK (approx. 100)

Luminex (approx. 10 – 100)

SOMASCAN (approximat. 2000)

Discovery LC-MSMS

100 – 4000 proteins dependent on

method/instrument (not predetermined - unbiased)

Targeted LC-MSM

1-100 predetermined

Page 13: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

A typical clinical proteomics data output

Page 14: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

14

Clinical proteomics - status?

basics – potentials / challenges

methods / types

examples

1: current clin use:

amyloidosis diagnosis

2: recent promising research

athero-diagnostica

3: caution

treatment interference (heparin)

Page 15: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Amyloidosis

Misfolded protein deposition in tissue: heart, kidney, skin, tendon, lung, etc

transthyretin

immunglobuliner

serum amyloid protein

many others

Causes MGUS, chron. inflam., genetic basis

Diagnostics

Congo red + Immunohistochem. difficult because of low specificity and no quantitation

New proteome diagnosis

Page 16: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Myokardie-Biopsi

Congo rød farvning + mikrodissektion

Congo rød

Congo rød med filter

Page 17: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Congo rød med filter

Page 18: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Proteomics for the diagnosis and sub type classificationof amyloidosis

Amyloidosis: Extracellular deposition of proteins in an insoluble beta-sheet

physical format

Most important amyloidogenic proteins include:

• ApoE

• ApoA1

• ApoA4

• Serum amyloid P

• Serum amyloid A

• Transthyretin

• IGK (immunoglobulin kappa)

• IGL (lambda light chains)

Management of amyloidosis relys on treatment of the underlying etiology:• High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation (AL-type amyloidosis)

• Liver transplantation ( hereditary TTR-type amyloidosis)

”Amyloid signature”

Specific subtypes

Immunoelectron microscopy and mass spectrometry for classification of amyloid deposits

Abildgaard et al

Amyloid J, 2019

Page 19: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Amyloidosis

Misfolded protein deposition in tissue: heart, kidney, skin, tendon, lung, etc

transthyretin

immunglobuliner

serum amyloid protein

many others

Causes MGUS, chron. inflam., genetic basis

Diagnostics

Congo red + Immunohistochem. difficult because of low specificity and no quantitation

New proteome diagnosis

Page 20: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

20

Clinical proteomics - status?

basics – potentials / challenges

methods / types

examples

1: current clin use:

amyloidosis diagnosis

2: recent promising research

athero-diagnostica

3: caution

treatment interference (heparin)

Page 21: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Acute heart attack – acute coronary syndrome – diagnosis & treatment

Other diseasesMuscular pain

Lungproblems

Perforated ulcer etc

Complications-arrythima

-cardiogenic schock

AMBULANCE

Initial diagnosis & treatment:

anticoag: aspirin, heparin, other

HOSPITAL

Diagnosis? ECG, plasma-troponin, CAG

Treatment (stent)

Complication-stratification/treatment?

Acute coronay occlusion

Treatment: balooning/stenting

Ventricular assist

=temporary pump

SurvivalDeath

BIOMARKERS NEEDED:

Better, quicker diagnosis

Complication-stratification

Page 22: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

22

Myeloperoxidase

sFRP3

Midkine

Syndecan-1

New potential biomarkers for diagnosis

and complication stratification in acute coronary syndrome

Page 23: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

23

1: 100 autopsy coronary arteries+aortas – atherosclerosis grading + proteomics:

lists of atherosclerosis-abundant proteins (1000 proteiner)

2: Plasma - multiplex LC-MSMS assay for 17 of these proteins

3: 100 individuals having coronary arteriography (CAG): +/- coronary disease

Page 24: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

24

Associations of proteins to plaque abundancy and type

Page 25: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

25

1: 100 autopsy coronary arteries+aortas – atherosclerosis grading + proteomics:

lists of atherosclerosis-abundant proteins (1000 proteiner)

2: Plasma - multiplex LC-MSMS assay for 17 of these proteins

3: 100 individuals having coronary arteriography (CAG): +/- coronary disease

Page 26: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

26

Performance of 15-plex plasma-athero-panel:

+/- angiographically determined coronary atherosclerosis

Page 27: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Acute heart attack – acute coronary syndrome – diagnosis & treatment

Other diseasesMuscular pain

Lungproblems

Perforated ulcer etc

Complications-arrythima

-cardiogenic schock

AMBULANCE

Initial diagnosis & treatment:

anticoag: aspirin, heparin, other

HOSPITAL

Diagnosis? ECG, plasma-troponin, CAG

Treatment (stent)

Complication-stratification/treatment?

Acute coronay occlusion

Treatment: balooning/stenting

Ventricular assist

=temporary pump

SurvivalDeath

BIOMARKERS NEEDED:

Better, quicker diagnosis

Complication-stratification

Page 28: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

28

Myeloperoxidase

sFRP3

Midkine

Syndecan-1

New potential biomarkers for diagnosis

and complication stratification in acute coronary syndrome

Plasma 17-plex-athero (vitronectin)

Page 29: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

29

Clinical proteomics - status?

basics – potentials / challenges

methods / types

examples

1: current clin use:

amyloidosis diagnosis

2: recent promising research

athero-diagnostica

3: caution

treatment interference (heparin)

Page 30: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Acute heart attack – acute coronary syndrome – diagnosis & treatment

Other diseasesMuscular pain

Lungproblems

Perforated ulcer etc

Complications-arrythima

-cardiogenic schock

AMBULANCE

Initial diagnosis & treatment:

anticoag: aspirin, heparin, other

HOSPITAL

Diagnosis? ECG, plasma-troponin, CAG

Treatment (stent)

Complication-stratification/treatment?

Acute coronay occlusion

Treatment: balooning/stenting

Ventricular assist

=temporary pump

SurvivalDeath

PREDICT STUDY

(N=500)

Page 31: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

31

DISCOVERY OF NOVEL BIOMARKERS TO BE USED FOR

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

OVERALL AIM

Discovery plasma proteomics to identify biomarkers for diagnosis and stratification

of patients with acute coronary syndromes

OUR APPROACH

- Plasma proteomics: Pre-analytical enrichment + LC-MSMS (800 proteins)

SUBSTUDY

Influence of heparin on the plasma proteome

A: 9 patients receiving heparin – plasma at 0, 2, 15, 60 min

B: Predict patients +/- heparin in ambulance

Beck et al, Clinical Chemistry, 2018 Oct; 64(10):1474-1484

Page 32: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

32

Heparin

-Polysaccharide, negatively charged

-Inhibits coagulation: Enhances binding of antithrombin to thrombin

-Is used to prevent further thrombosis development

in acute coronary syndrome and other situations

Page 33: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

33

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Re

lati

ve a

bu

nd

ance

Time [min]

Blood sampling followed byHeparin administration

Secreted frizzled-related protein-1

SPARC-related modularcalcium-binding protein 1

Myeloperoxidase

ApoC - I to IV

Effect of heparin administration

on plasma proteins

(PCI procedure, n=9)

>800 protein ID

25 sign. changes

(bonferroni-corrected, p<7x10-5)

FEW PROTEIN

EXAMPLES

Page 34: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

34

Page 35: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Acute heart attack – acute coronary syndrome – diagnosis & treatment

Other diseasesMuscular pain

Lungproblems

Perforated ulcer etc

Complications-arrythima

-cardiogenic schock

AMBULANCE

Initial diagnosis & treatment:

anticoag: aspirin, heparin, other

HOSPITAL

Diagnosis? ECG, plasma-troponin, CAG

Treatment (stent)

Complication-stratification/treatment?

Acute coronay occlusion

Treatment: balooning/stenting

Ventricular assist

=temporary pump

SurvivalDeath

Heparin ???

75 % had received heparin before hospital entry

Page 36: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

36

Page 37: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

37

One protein example verified by a

calibrated immunoassay: MIDKINE

Page 38: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

38

Proposed mechanism

Competition (wash) of proteins bound to endothelial cell surface heparan sulphates

VESSEL WALL

Exoneous

heparin

LUMEN

Page 39: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

39

Myeloperoxidase

sFRP3

Midkine

Syndecan-1

New potential biomarkers for diagnosis

and complication stratification in acute coronary syndrome

Plasma 17-plex-athero (vitronectin)

Page 40: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

40

Myeloperoxidase

sFRP3

Midkine

Syndecan-1

New potential biomarkers for diagnosis

and complication stratification in acute coronary syndrome

Plasma 17-plex-athero (vitronectin)Effects of heparin???

Page 41: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

41

Clinical proteomics - status?

basics – potentials / challenges

methods / types

examples

1: current clin use:

amyloidosis diagnosis

2: recent promising research

athero-diagnostica

3: caution

treatment interference (heparin)

Page 42: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

42

Clinical proteomics - status?

• proteomics is working !!!!

• technologies are robust, reproducible,

both discovery and targeted approaches

• >1000 protein IDs in discovery modes

• high-throughput: series of

>1000 individual samples

• clinical data needs to be good

• studies should focus on unmet clinical

needs, not technology potentials

• within 5-10 several new specific

applications will appear

Page 43: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

43

Proteomics – status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken

Thank you for your attention

Lars Melholt Rasmussen

professor, overlæge

Afd. for Klinisk Biokemi og Farmakologi, KBF

Odense Universitets Hospital, OUH

Page 44: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

44

Page 45: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

45

Page 46: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

46

Page 47: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

47

Personlig medicin

Kendskab til individuelle

egenskaber

Bedre diagnostik

Bedre stratificering

Bedre monitorering

Skræddersyet behandling

Registre

køn, alder, bosted

indlæggelser

lab.data

recepter

Biologiske data

konventionelle

OMICS

Big data

Biostatistik

Art. Intel.

Page 48: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

48

Myeloperoxidase

sFRP3

Midkine

Syndecan-1

New potential biomarkers are influenced by

heparin !! (in these studies heparin medication in ambulance is not registred)

Page 49: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

49

Myeloperoxidase

sFRP3

Midkine

Syndecan-1

New potential biomarkers for myocardial damage,

coronary occlusion and heart insufficiency

Effects of heparin???

Page 50: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

50

New biomarkers for cardiogenic shock

in acute coronary syndrome

Substudy of PREDICT (national study)

Acute coronary syndrome

Pre-hospital Hospital + CAG

Blood sample (BNP, copeptin, TnI/T) + Echo

STEMI

Normal CAG

Cardiogenic shock

(early – late)Plasma proteomics

n=320

+/- heparin (75/25 %) Collab: B: Jacob Eifer Møller, Lisette Okkels Jensen et al

KBF: Hans C Beck, LMR et al

Page 51: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

51

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Re

lati

ve a

bu

nd

ance

Time [min]

Blood sampling followed byHeparin administration

Secreted frizzled-related protein-1

SPARC-related modularcalcium-binding protein 1

Myeloperoxidase

ApoC - I to IV

Effect of heparin administration

on plasma proteins

(PCI procedure, n=9)

>1000 protein ID

Ca 75 sign. changes

FEW PROTEIN

EXAMPLES:

Page 52: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

52

New biomarkers for cardiogenic shock

in acute coronary syndrome

Substudy of PREDICT (national study)

Acute coronary syndrome

Pre-hospital Hospital + CAG

Blood sample (BNP, copeptin, TnI/T) + Echo

STEMI

Normal CAG

Cardiogenic shock

(early – late)Plasma proteomics

n=320

+/- heparin (75/25 %) Collab: B: Jacob Eifer Møller, Lisette Okkels Jensen et al

KBF: Hans C Beck, LMR et al

Page 53: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

53

*** ** ***

*** ******

** ****

*** p < 10-9 ** 10-6 > p > 10-9 * 10-3 > p > 10-6

***

Page 54: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

54

-What is clinical proteomics?

methods / types

research example (apoliporot.)

clinical example (amyloidosis)

-Some challenges in plasma proteomics

assays

preanalytical

drug interference

Page 55: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

DNA mRNA Protein

Gene

DNA

mRNA1

mRNA2

mRNA3

mRNA4

mRNA5

SplicingProtein1

Protein2

Protein3

Protein4

Protein5

Protein6

....

Proteini

Post-translationalprocessing

Genomics Transcriptomics Proteomics

Page 56: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

56

Page 57: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

OUH maj 2011/MO

Clinical Biochemistry Research Unit, KBF, OUHUniv. of Southern Denmark

Page 58: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

58

Page 59: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

59

Page 60: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

60

Page 61: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

61

Fra forskning til hverdag med NGS, omics og big data

Lokale Skovbrynet

Mødeleder: Morten Pedersen

10.05-10.30

Fra patient til svar med NGS

Jesper Boulund Kristensen, Lone Andersen

10.30-11.00

Proteomics – status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken

Lars Melholt Rasmussen

11.00-11.30

Big Data er vejen til bedre børnevaccinationer

Tue Bjerg Bennike

8.20 – 9.20

National strategi for personlig medicin - skræddersyet behandling til alle?

Professor Søren Brunak

Page 62: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

62

Præsentationen vil lægge ud med en diskussion

af begrebet ”proteomics”, og kort

opsummere hvilke teknologier der anvendes, og

hvad de dækker over og hvilke outcomes,

man kan forvente fra forskellige platforme.

Herefter vil eksempler fremdrages som

illustrerer state of the science: status for aktuel

anvendelse af proteomics i klinisk

sammenhæng, områdets potentiale og en

diskussion af, hvad vi kan forvente i fremtiden

Page 63: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

63

Personalised medicine:

Personalised medicine: a move away from a ‘one size fits all’ approach to the treatment

and care of patients with a particular condition, to one which uses new approaches to

better manage patients’ health and target therapies to achieve the best outcomes in the

management of a patient’s disease or predisposition to disease.

Page 64: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

64

Page 65: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

65

Page 66: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

66

-Measurements of specific proteins are central

in clinical medicine (clin. biochem., pathology)

single markers

diagnosis: troponins, BNP

risk stratification (apolipoproteins, CRP)

monitoring drug effects (INR (factor II, VII, X)

multi markers

double testing (chrom. abberations)

elf-test (liver fibrosis)

-Precision medicine needs detailed phenotypingmeasurement of many proteins simultaneously (proteomics)

is believed to contain great potentials

-Genomics is already estabished in research and routine

-So what is the status with clinical proteomics?

Page 67: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

67

Page 68: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

68

Page 69: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

69

Page 70: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

70

-What is clinical proteomics?

methods / types

research example (apoliporot.)

clinical example (amyloidosis)

-Some challenges in plasma proteomics

assays

preanalytical

drug interference

Page 71: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

71

Crista Cobbaert

All apolipoprotein-multiplex LC-MSMS assay

Page 72: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

72

INITIAL HEPARIN STUDY

Aim

Effect of heparin administration on plasma proteins?

Patients

PCI procedure, n=9

0, 2, 15, 60 min after 5000 IU of heparin iv

Plasma proteome analysis

>800 protein quantification

Page 73: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

Workflow for LC-MSMS proteome analysis

nano-LC-MSMS

Plasma

Tissue

Mass spectra

Peptide sequence

Protein ident.

Bioinformatics

Nano-LC

Separation

(chromat.)

Individual

versus

Pools

Unbiased versus targeted Quantification-spectral counts

-labeled peptides

-isobaric labelling

Fragmentation:

Trypsination

Peptides

Page 74: Lars Melholt Rasmussen professor, overlæge Afd. for ...deks.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/3.2-LM.pdf1 Proteomics –status i relation til anvendelse i klinikken Lars Melholt Rasmussen

74

Proteome results