Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

30
Influence of Beta - Blocker Continuation or Withdrawal on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 52, No. 3, 2008 Fonarow et al. S. Nadery, MCH 2008

Transcript of Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Page 1: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Influence of Beta - Blocker

Continuation or Withdrawal on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 52, No. 3, 2008Fonarow et al.

S. Nadery, MCH 2008

Page 2: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Vragen en opmerkingen graag bewaren tot aan einde van deze presentatie

Page 3: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Introduction One

Heart failure (HF) highly lethal Mortality 25% to 45% ( rst year) fi 1.1 million/ year U.S.; primary cause

hospitalizations 2.4 to 3.6 million hospitalizations

contributing factor Previous studies showed:

Certain beta-blockers Reduced 35 % mortality

National guidlines

Page 4: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Introduction Two

Continuation or withdrawn of beta -blocker

Hospitalization and before admission OPTIMIZE - HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving

Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure)

Large, representative cohort study

Page 5: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Methods

Page 6: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Study design

March 2003 - December 2004 Inclusion criteria:

New episode HF Worsening HF Significant HF symptoms develops

of another primary diagnosis Exclusion criteria:

Contraindication Intolerance

Page 7: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Statistical analysis

Pearson chi-square test: Categorical variables

Kruskal-Wallis test: Continuous variables

Propensity score and Multivariable adjustment: Relationship ß-blocker and

outcome

Page 8: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Results one

Total enrollment: 48,612 patients from 259 hospitals

Confined: 5,791 patients from 91 hospitals

Pre-specified 60- to 90-day post-discharge follow-up

From 5,791 patients: In 5,117 pts LVF assessed In 2,720 pts LVSD documented

Further details Table 1

Page 9: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Result two

Page 10: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1
Page 11: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1
Page 12: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Result three

HF before admission 89.3 % Medication on admission:

Beta blockers 57 % ACE inhibitor 47 % Angiotensin receptor blocker 12 % Aldosterone antagonist 10 % Digoxin 30 %

Hospitalized duration mean 6.4 days (median 5 days)

Page 13: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Result four

From 2,720 pts: 2,373 (87.2 %) eligible for ß-blocker therapy 347 (12.8 %) ineligible (contraindication

or intolerance) From 2,373 pts eligible for

ß-blocker therapy: 1,350 (56.9 %) continued on ß-B 79 (3.3 %) withdrawn 303 (12.8 %) not treated 632 (26.6 %) newly started 9 (0.4 %) missing data

Page 14: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Result five

Among 1,537 patients receiving beta-blocker therapy before hospital presentation: 1,350 (87.8%) continued on beta-

blocker therapy 187 (12.2%) withdrawn (108 with

documented contraindications or intolerance and 79 without) LVEF was lower

Page 15: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Result six

Page 16: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1
Page 17: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1
Page 18: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

ß-Blocker use and clinical outcomes

Page 19: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1
Page 20: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Result eight

Click hyperlinks or please move to PDF file Figure 1

Page 21: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1
Page 22: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Tolerability

Therapy Continuation Group: 93.6 % remaining of ß-Blocker

Therapy Newly Starting Group: 91.9 % remaining of ß-Blocker

Therapy Not Prescribed Group: 23.9 % started ß-Blocker OR 46.7, CI 32 to 68, p. 0.0001

Therapy Withdrawn Group: 56.5 % restarted ß-Blocker OR 11.3, CI 6.5 to 19, p. 0.0001

Page 23: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Discussion one

OPTIMIZE-HF program: In uence of continuation and withdrawal fl

of beta-blocker therapy Registry contains: characteristics,

presenting symptoms, treatments, and outcomes

Continuation of beta- blocker therapy: lower risk.

Withdrawal of beta-blockers associated: excess adjusted mortality risk.

Continuation of beta- blocker therapy: well tolerated

Page 24: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Discussion two

Decision of discontinue BB: Greater state of decompensation may account for poor outcomes Abrupt cessation of BB associated:

Ischemia Hypertension Ventricular arrhythmias Myocardial infarction

No reason(s) collected for decisions In some case contraindication and

intolerance not documented Interpretation of results subject to

limitation (not a RCT)

Page 25: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Discussion three

LVEF in Withdrawn Group: Lower (21.7 %, p. 0.0001)

Serum creatinine high High exp. post-discharge mortality DM 60 to 90-days post-discharge

mortality vs mortality and/or rehospitalization

Page 26: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1
Page 27: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

And ….

Gregg C. Fonarow, William T. Abraham, Nancy M. Albert, Wendy Gattis Stough, Mihai Gheorghiade Barry H. Greenberg, Christopher M. O’Connor, Jie Lena Sun, Clyde W. Yancy, James B. Young,

Page 29: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Conclusions

Continuation of beta-blocker therapy among patients hospitalized with HF is associated with better outcomes than those in whom beta-blocker therapy is withdrawn or never initiated.

Page 30: Influence B Blocker Mch Augustus 2008 1

Questions?