HRM PRESENTATION2
-
Author
adnan-ahmad -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of HRM PRESENTATION2
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
1/16
PRESENTED BY:-
GROUP NUMBER :-2 SECTION :-C
MITHUN KUMAR MOHANTY 11202161ABHENDU CHANDRA SAHA 11202162
SURANJAN MAZUMDAR 11202164
SOMNATH BAHTTACHARYA 11202167
ADNAN AHMAD 11202170
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
2/16
Briefing on case study
Issues involved
Theoretical inputs
Alternatives available
Advantages & Disadvantages of Alternatives
Recommendation
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
3/16
HR problems faced by Bata India Ltd. - End of the 1990s. Loss of 420 million in 1995.
1995-Bata Shoe Organization Restructured entire board
William Keith Weston-MD
Mike Middleton- Deputy managing Director
R Senonner headed Marketing division.
The profit went down in 2000 after a consecutive increase in
the profit margin for four years since 1995
1996- BATA signed Bipartite agreement.
1993-99 cut down the staff - to 6700 and welfare measures.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
4/16
ASSAULT CASE
1996- Chief welfare officer was assaulted in Batanagar.
1998-Weston was assaulted by four workers at Batanagar
Management dismissed three employees
Batanagar employees went on strike after two days.
BSO withdrew investment plans
In 14 Jan 1999,BMU submitted demand list to the
management.
Economic and non economic issues(reinstatement of four
dismissed employees)
Demanded worker participation in management.
Wage hike - Rs 90/ week.
Increase ofplanbonus & introduction of attendance bonus
for migrant workers.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
5/16
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
1995& 1998 Signed 3 years bipartite agreement with BMU
and WB govt.
Feb 1999- Lockout in BATAs Faridabad unit-manufacturingHawai Chappal & canvas.
Oct 1999- Unit resumed production-3yrs wage agreement
signed.
March 8, 2000- Lockout in Peenyas.
July-2000 BATA lifted lockout.
Demanded Revocation of 20 fellow employees, maintaining
normal production schedule, confirmation to standing orders
not to be insisted upon. September-2000 Downsizing resulted Labor dispute as
management increased outsourcing from china and perceived
declining importance of Batanagar unit.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
6/16
Financial Breakdown: The Bata company experienced a loss
of 420 million in 1995 for the first time in the companyshistory. They were leading the Market single handedly for 60
years and made the market almost a monopoly.
Labor Problem: The Trade Union had conflicts with themanagement intentionally. Strike was a regular phenomena for
this company also labor class employees assaulted their own
MD, Mr. William Keith Weston in 1998.
Labor Surplus: The company had surplus labor since a long
time. The data shows, they had 15000 employees in India
whereas their next competitor the Liberty Shoes had only 5000
employees in 1995.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
7/16
High-cost structure: This was another consequence andimportant concern of the organization. They were incurring a
lot of employee wages, employee welfare wages. The data
shows 22% of their sales were distributed among the
employees as salary in 1999 whereas only 5% was the
employee salary wages for Liberty Shoes.
Change in Management: The entire Board of Directors were
replaced with a new group in 1995. They laid off more than
250 managers and stopped recruitment.
Cost Cutting: They took several steps to cut the huge coststructure by phasing out several welfare wages, they
employed forced retirement by asking juniors to quit.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
8/16
Outsourcing: Earlier outsourcing was limited to assembly &sewing line job now company outsourced fully manufacturedshoes from China.
Selection and recruitment issues: Bata offered its staffemployment policy linked to sales growth performance.Employees were resistant of such changes.
Compensation(a) Basic remuneration issues: The basic remuneration was poor
and there were no set standardized norms for increase in the
pay.(b) Productivity Linked Incentives: Productivity linked
incentives was utilized effectively. In 1997, Bata workersachieved 93% of their production targets. The managementrewarded the workers with a 17% bonus, up from the 15%
given in 1996.(c) Employee Benefits and services: The company nearly
withdrew management subsidies, canteen facilities, electricityand health care schemes for the employees' families whichincluded the plan of dismantling the public health unit
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
9/16
TRANING DEVELOPMENT & CARRER MANAGEMENT
when the people were retrenched and others handled the
same job no training or development issues were visible. The
carrier development aspect of the employees was also missingwhich contributed to the low morale of the people.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE
Due to post economic liberalization the percentage of cost
towards employers was a massive 22% compared to its
competitors 5%. as their profits were declining.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
10/16
MANAGEMENT OF TRADE UNIONS.
Trade unions had influence of the various political parties.
These elements were scrupulous in nature and so usednegative tactics like militant force and assault on themanagement.
JOB DESIGN
Job design at Bata was identified and refined from time totime and so they were able to remove excess manpower aswell as cut down unnecessary expenditure.
SURPLUS MANPOWER
Heavily overstaffed and had a huge expenditure towardsemployees compared to their competitors.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
11/16
SELECTION AND RECRUITMENT ISSUES
Employees were resistant of such changes but the perception
of corruption associated with Bata the change was a right step
as these managers were indulging in large scale corruption.
MANAGING SEPARATIONS AND RIGHTSIZING
Retrenchment was carried out but no sensitization paid to
these issues which had an adverse effect on the employees
morale. Overstaffing issues were handled with a strong hand
and people asked to leave.
MOTIVATION
As the company sold its Calcutta office the employee's morale
was low due to the issue of honor associated with it. The
motivation levels of the people who had to shift from a metro
to a small town also would have taken a severe dip.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
12/16
Individual rewards & recognition along with a revamped HR
strategy with respect to hiring & compensating employees.
Employees should had been given proper bonuses along with
other perquisites,ie, Bata should have kept the promises it had
previously made to its employees. This should have been the
best alternative.
The budget of employees welfare could have been omittedcompletely & salary should have been increased in place of
that.
There should have been a proper middle management who
could bridge the gap between the BMU & The topManagement.
Recruitment policy should have been restructured prior to
1995 itself when it decided to stop recruitment.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
13/16
Motivation level of the present employees would have been
increased individually.
Employees would do their work in more effective & efficient
manner. The team work could have been more efficient inorder to get more bonus.
Companies fund would have been increased in better manner
& employees would also become happy due to the increaseof salary.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
14/16
This procedure would not enhance the motivation level much
for some of the less efficient employees.
The top level management would have been dissatisfied with
this decision.
This could bring some additional profit in the company
overall. However, this could also bring more conflict between
the top level management and the Union.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
15/16
From the above case we can understand that having the right
HR practices is very important for over-all profits & reputation
of the company. Here the main thing is lack of people who
would have acted as a mediator between the top management& the labor unions.
-
8/2/2019 HRM PRESENTATION2
16/16