Diego Alejandro Alonso-Nuno, A089 711 493 (BIA June 17, 2013)

7/28/2019 Diego Alejandro Alonso-Nuno, A089 711 493 (BIA June 17, 2013)

1/10

Anderson Il, Thomas R. EsquireRobichaud, Anderson & Alcantara PA211 Washington Avenue NohMinneapolis, MN 55401

Name: ALNSNUN, DIEG ALEJA

Executive Oce r Imigration Review

Bd Igt AppO k

5107 Leesburg Pik. Suite 2000Falls Cuch, Vgn 22041

OHS/ICE ice of Chief Counsel - BLM2901 Metro Drive, Suite 100Bloomington, MN 55425

A 089711493

Date of tis notice 6/17/2013

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-rerenced case.

Enclosure

Pl Mb:G, Edwd R

Sincerely,

D CtDona Carr

Chief Clerk

hk:

Cite as: Diego Alejandro Alonso-Nuno, A089 711 493 (BIA June 17, 2013)


2/10

U.S Department of JusticeExecutiv Oce r ImmatQn Revew

Decsion of the Board of Immiation Appeals

Fas Chch, Vgna22041

File: A089 711 493 -Bloomington MN

In re DIEGO ALEJANDRO ALONSONUNO

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

APPEAL

Date

ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT Thomas R Anderson, III Esquire

APPLICATION Contnuce; volutary departure

JUN 17203

The resondent a nate and citizen of Mexico appeals he decsion of the ImmigrationJudge dated Aprl 11 2012 denying hs motion r a contnuce and grantng hs request rvolunay dearre. See section 240B(b) of e Immigration d Nationality Act 8 USC 1229c(b) We will dsmiss the resondents apeal and as he respondent has presentedevidence at he posted the requisite voluntay depure bond provide hm w 60 days tovoluarily dear is couny

We a the mmgraton Judge's decson The respondent rough counsel has concededthat he is subject to removal om the Unted States because he is an alien who is resent in thiscounty out being admed or paoled or who rved at any time or place other than asdesated by the Attoey eneral (I.J at 2; Tr at 18; Exh 1) See section 212(a)(6)(A)(i) of

the Act 8 USC 1182{a)(6)(A)(i) As the respondent is subject to removal om he UntedStates t is hs burden to establish elgbility r relief om removal See section 240(c)(4)(A) ofthe Act 8 USC 1229a(c)(4)(A); 8 CF.R 12408(d). However he respondent does notallege that at he present tme he is elgble r any rm of relief om remova which can begrted by Immgration Judge or ths Bod

"Good cause does not eist r a her contnuance of hese remoal proceedings See8 CFR 100329 12406 Even tough the respondent s apparently the benecy of mmgrant sa petton led by hs nted States citzen w the respondent does not allege ati the petition is approved he woud be eligible to adjust status under section 245 of the Act8 SC 1255 Maer of Hashmi, 24 I&N Dec 85 (BIA 2009) (recognzng that acontinuce may be warrted where an aien has resented edence that he is the benecay ofa ending immigrant visa petition and established a likelihood of success on an application radjustment of staus) Moreoer alen such as te respondent who s the subject of ongongremoa proceedngs s not eliible to le an Applcaton r Prosional Unlawl PresenceWaier (Form I601A) with United Sates Citizenshp and Imigration Serices (SCIS)8 CFR 2127(e)(4)(v) (eectve M 4 2013) (stating that an alien s nelgble r a

prosonal ulawl resence waiver under 8 CFR 2127(e) if the alien is n remoalproceedngs unless the removal proceedngs are admnisratiely closed and hae not beenrecalendared at the time of ling the For I601A); ee alo Provisional nal PresenceWavers of Inadmissbilty r Certan Imedate Relatves 8 Fed Reg 536 (Jan 3 2013)(nal rule) Thus inasmuch as e respondent has not established that f these removalceedngs were her continued he would be potentally elgible r any of mmgraon



3/10

A089 711 93

eet whch woud ermt hm to rema ths couy ad ca be grated by a mmgraoJudge or ths Board the mmato Judge roery denedhe resodets request ra thercouace of these remoa roceedgs (J at 3 Maer of Sanchez-Sosa, 5 &NDec 807 815 (BA 01 (recogzg that a cotuace shoud ot be grated where t seg sough as a datory tacc to resa the cocuso of remoa roceedgs

Addtoay e resodet has ot demostrated that he was rejudced by the mmgraoJudges to dey hs request r a cotuace Maer of Sibrun, 18 &N Dec 35 (BA 1983Now more tha a ye aer the mmgrato Judge deed the resodet's request r acotuace ad seera moths aer he reguatos coceg rosoa uaw resecewaers hae bee azed the resodet has yet to rese edece that USCS has aroedether the mmgrt sa etto whch hs souse ed o hs behaf or rosoa uawresece waer See Maer of Cea, 0 &N Dec 399 03 (BA 1991 (otg that we eot oraby dsosed o the ractce of watg ut the cocuso of the admstrae aea

rocess to e a moto that seeks o oer addtoal edece regadg the matter reousy ssue Accordgy we w ot dsturb he mmgrao Judges decso to cocude theseroceedgs by eterg a 60day outay dearture order The owg orders are etered

ORDER: The resodets aea s dsmssed

FURTHER ORDER: Pursuanto the mmgrato Judges order ad codtoed uocomace wth codtos set rth by the mmgrato Judge ad the statute the resodes

ermtted to ouy deart the Uted States wthout exese to the oeet wth60 days om the date of ths order or ay exteso beyod hat tme as may be grated by theDeet of Homead Secur (DHS See secto 0B(b of the mmgrao ad

Natoaty Act 8 USC 19c(b; see also 8 CFR 106(c (. the ee theresodet s to oty det the Ued States the resodet sha be remoed asroded the mmgrato Judges order

NOTCE f the resodet s to outary det the Uted States wth e tmeerod seced or ay extesos grated by the DHS the resodet sha be subject to a ceaty as roded by the reguatos ad he statute ad sha be egbe r a erod of10 yes r ay rther reef uder secto 0B ad sectos 0A 5 8 ad 9 of theAct See secto 0B( d of the Act

A: f the resodet es a moto to reoe or recosder ror to the exratoof the ountary dearre erod set rth aboe the grat of ountary dearture sautomatcay termated; the erod aowed r outary dearture s ot sayed toed orexeded f the grt of outy deature s automatcay termated uo e g of a

moto the eates r ure to det uder secto 0B(d of the Act sha ot ay See8 CFR 106(e(

AN f ror to deartg the Ued Sates the resodet es ay judcachaege to ths admsratey a order such as a etto r reew ursuat tosecto of the Act 8 USC 15 the at of outy dearture s automatcaytermated ad the alteate order of remoa sha mmedatey take eect Howeer f theresodet es a etto r reew ad e dets the Uted States wt 30 days of suchg e resodet w ot be deemed to hae deated uder a order of remoal f the aerodes to e DHS such eece of hs or her deture that the mmgrato ad Customs

2Cite as: Diego Alejandro Alonso-Nuno, A089 711 493 (BIA June 17, 2013)


4/10

'

A089 7 93

nrceent Feld Oce rector of the DHS ay reqre and prodes edence DH deessucen that he or she has reaned outsde of the Unted States he penaltes r falure todepar under secton 0B(d of the Act shall not apply to an alen who les a petton r reewnotwthstandng y perod of te that heor she reans n the Unted States whle he pettonr reew s pendng See 8 CFR 06(

FOR

3



5/10

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEEXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IITION REVIEW

UNITED STATES IIATION CORT

BLOOMNTON MINNESOT

Fle A08911-49 Apl 1 2012

In the Matte o

DIEO ALEJANDRO AONSONUNO I REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

RSONDENT

CHARE Secton 212(a) 6) (A) () pesent wthoutadmsson o paole ate nspectn nImgton ce.

APPLICATONS: A cntnance and olunta depatue

ON BEHL OF RESONDENT THOMAS R NDESON II IAttone at Law

ON BEHL O DHS: DAI EL J PORNSCHLOELAssstant Che Consel

OAL DECISION OF THE IMMIGATION JUDGE

The espondent was placed n emoal poceedngs n

Septeme 2010 the lng wth the Imgaton Cout the

Notce to ppea Exht 1 The espondent was chaged wth

eng suect to emoal unde Secton 22{a) 6) (A) () o the

Imgatn and Natonalt Act (ct) Ths chage was ased

1


6/10

upon allegatons that the espondent ented the Untd States

n abot Novebe 2008 wthout beng admtted o paold afte

nspecton b an Imgaton offce.

The espondent, thogh consel, admtted th fou factual

allgatons contaned n the Notce to Appea and conceded that

he was sbect to emoval as chaged Based pon those

admssons and concssons and the beng no othe sse of law

o fact elatng to th chag, t s sstaned. 8 F.

1240(c)

At the espondent's heang on Octobe 17, 2011, at whch

the pladngs wee taken, the espondent ndcated that an I130

was beng fled on hs behalf based pon hs maage he

pevos wek to a Unted States ctzen spose and that he

would be eqstng volnta depatue because of the ned to

onsla pocess once and f, that petton s appoved. The

case was eschedled to Apl 11, 2012

The espondnt fled documents at the Apl 11 heang,

whch th out wll mak and ent as Ehbt 2. These

documents ndcate that the espondents wfe dd fl an I130

petton on Mach 16, 2012, and t s stll pndng. The

espondent equested a contnuance of poceedngs gven the

poposed eglatons concenng povsonal unlawfl psence

wavs tht wh plshed n the Fedal Rgister at th ndof Mach The spondent ages that he should be allowed a

contnuance, fst to hav the I-130 petton adjudcatd and,

A089711-493 2 Apl 11, 2012


7/10

seond o low he poposed egions o be pomlged nd

beome effeie so h he n e dnge of he poisions

of hose eglions.

The o does deine o gn oninne in his se

nde hese isnes A pending I-10 is no nom he

bsis o onining se when he esponden is lso eqied

o ee he Unied Ses in ode o onsl poess

Bese he esponden eneed he Unied Ses wiho

inspeion nd hs no been died o poed he is

ineigibe fo dsmen of ss in he Unied Ses

Een wih he poposed eglions eling o poisionl

nlwf pesene wives he o is sill disinlined o

gn oninne in his se The o noes h he

poposed egions doe he inen of deesing he peiod

of ime n indiid s ein oside of he Unied Ses

while ons poessing owee he o noes h hese

e een poposed egions he omen peiod ends

he end of Jne nd hee is no e ndiion if nd when

hese egions wold beome effeie. The o kes ino

on he hiso of poposed egions in he Imigion

onex nd he f h mee poposl of egion does no

neessi esl in finl egion being pomlged

The o lso kes ino on in his se he

h he esponden nd his Unied Ses iizen wife mied

while he esponden ws in poeedings nd shold he boh

A08971149 Apil 11 2012


8/10

been fuy aare a te respnden as ging be reured t

eave e Unied Stae o onsuar prcess rug any approved

-10 visa petition

n e aernaive, e respndent eeks vunary

deparure and as indicated a e il be reserving is rig

appea. onsuenty e is no eigibe fr premeri

vlunary departure and te our i gran pstmeris

vunary deparure prvided at e repnden pst a

olunary deparure bnd iin five business days of is

decisin in e aoun f 1, 000.

Accrdingly, e foing rders sal be enered

DES

1 Te carge under Secin 212 a (6) (A) i) f te Ac is

susained

Te respondent is graned te priviege of volunarily

departing e Uned Saes on or befre June 10 012 Tis

grant f voluntary deparure is cningen upon e respndent

ng a vunary departure bond in te amoun of $1, 000

itin five business days of tis deciin. f e respondent

fais t ps suc deparure bnd r fais to depar iin e

ie given e vluntary deparure is autmatically itdran

iou ntice r proceedings and an rder f remova Mexic

beces iediately effective. e respndent ai

depar iin te time given e ll be barred fr ten years

fr appying for certain igraion benefits, including

A0911-49 4 Aprl 11 0


9/10

lutar dearture cancellatn f real adjutent r

change f Iigratin tatu. urther the rendent wul bebject t a c enaty f $3, 000

A089493

SUSAN E ASTIgratin udge

5 ril 0


10/10

,.I

CERTIICTE PGE

I heeby cefy ha he aached poceedng befoe UGE

SUS E CSTR n he mae of:

IEG LER LSU

8949

BLMIGT, MIEST

s an accuae, veba ascp of he ecodng as povded

y he Execuve ffc fo Imgaon Rew and ha hs s

he ognal anscp heeof fo he fle of he Execve

ffce fo Imgaon Revew

.

BB CULLIT Tansce)

EE STE ERTIG, Inc

Y 0, 2012

(Compleon ae}

Diego Alejandro Alonso-Nuno, A089 711 493 (BIA June 17, 2013)

Documents

Transcript of Diego Alejandro Alonso-Nuno, A089 711 493 (BIA June 17, 2013)