D3 m D8 m Karola Rittner, Caroline Tosch, Christelle Remy ...€¦ · Pseudocowpox virus (PCPV), a...

Post on 24-Jul-2020

5 views 0 download

Transcript of D3 m D8 m Karola Rittner, Caroline Tosch, Christelle Remy ...€¦ · Pseudocowpox virus (PCPV), a...

Pseudocowpox virus (PCPV), a potent viral vector for both

antigen-dependent and independent cancer immunotherapy

Karola Rittner, Caroline Tosch, Christelle Remy-Ziller, Christine Thioudellet, Marie-Christine Claudepierre, Virginie Nourtier, Chantal Hoffmann, Doris Schmitt, Benoit Grellier, Laurence

Laruelle, Benoit Sansas, Johann Foloppe, Philippe Erbs, Nathalie Silvestre, Kaïdre Bendjama, Eric Quéméneur.

Transgene SA, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Our recent data confirm the potential of PCPV as a new vector for anti-tumor vaccination, in particular for its intrinsic ability to control tumor growth in a tumor antigen-independent manner. Heterologous prime

boost regimen with our individualized vaccine approach myVac or combination with oncolytic virotherapy can be envisaged. Detailed studies in the human immune cells from patients are ongoing to dissect effects

of PCPV on immunosuppressive and immunostimulating cell populations. Patent application filed.

SITC Washington November 7-11, 2018

TAA-INDEPENDENT EFFECTS IN MC38 TUMOR MODEL

MC38 cells (HPV16E7-)(2.106 cells), sc

Tumor control, survival

D1D9 virus, itu D16 virus, ituC57BL/6

D2 virus (1.107 pfu), itu

MVA PCPV buffer

Tumor size evolution MVA vs PCPV: p-value=0.003 at Day 15, and 0.004 at Day 18 PCPV vs MVA p-value=0.006

TAA-DEPENDENT RESPONSES IN NAÏVE AND TC1-BEARING MICE

IV, 1.105 pfu IV, 1.105 pfu Harvest lungs and spleens• MVA

• MVA-HPV16E7 • PCPV-HPV16E7 • buffer D8 D15

Naïve C57BL/6 mice

ELISPOT analysis in splenocytesIntracellular cytokine staining (ICS) in lung cells:

HPV16E7-specific T cells in CD3dimCD8dim population

CD3

CD

8

buffer

PCPV

MVA

BACKGROUND

MC38 tumors - MVA-HPVE7 m

Tu

mo

r vo

lum

e (

mm

3)

Day

5

Day

8

Day

11

Day

15

Day

18

Day

22

Day

25

Day

29

0

500

1000

1500

2000

m 1

m2

m3

m4

m5

m6

m7

m8

m9

m10

MC38 tumors - PCPV-HPVE7 m

Tu

mo

r vo

lum

e (

mm

3)

Day

5

Day

8

Day

11

Day

15

Day

18

Day

22

Day

25

Day

29

0

500

1000

1500

2000

m 1

m2

m3

m4

m5

m6

m7

m8

m9

m10

MC38 tumors - buffer

Tu

mo

r vo

lum

e (

mm

3)

Day

5

Day

8

Day

11

Day

15

Day

18

Day

22

Day

25

Day

29

0

500

1000

1500

2000

m 1

m2

m3

m4

m5

m6

m7

m8

m9

m10

PCPV injected into MC38 tumors reduced tumor size and increased survival

PCPV-HPV16E7 induced strong cellular response against HPV16E7 detectable in spleen and lung

AC

B

cell

nu

mb

er

MVA m

MVA H

PV16E7m

PCPV HPV16E7

buffer

0

200

400

600

CD3dimCD8dim R9F-specific IFN- secreting T cells R9F-specific IFN- secretion

sp

ots

/106 c

ells

MVA m

MVA H

PV16E7m

PCPV HPV16E7

buffer

0

100

200

300

400

R9F (HPV16E7)

K9i-3 (CTRL)

*

*

Viral vectors expressing tumor antigens and/or cytokines have proven to be clinically effective approaches to stimulate anti-tumor immunity and to change the tumor microenvironment. However, novel viral strains

with improved immunogenic properties would be beneficial to expand the scope of virotherapeutic approaches. We identified Pseudocowpox virus (PCPV) from a Poxviridae screening program. Compared to well

established poxvirus strains like MVA or oncolytic Vaccinia virus (VACV), PCPV induced the secretion of 1,000-fold more IFN-alpha in human PBMCs. PCPV treatment induced efficient activation of antigen-

presenting cells, and a less suppressive phenotype in in vitro derived M2-like macrophages and MDSCs [see AACR 2018, poster LB-287]. A recombinant PCPV encoding the tumor associated antigen (TAA)

HPV16E7 was generated to assess the anti-tumor activity in the syngeneic murine tumor models MC38 (HPV16E7-) and TC1 (HPV16E7+).

**

D1

Lung CD3dimCD8dim T cells

anti CD8 PCPV

Tu

mo

r vo

lum

e (

mm

3)

Day

2

Day

6

Day

8

Day

12

Day

14

Day

16

Day

20

Day

22

Day

27

Day

29

Day

34

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000m2

m 1

m3

m4

m5

m6

m7

m8

m9

m10

m12

m13

buffer

Tu

mo

r vo

lum

e (

mm

3)

Day

2

Day

6

Day

8

Day

12

Day

14

Day

16

Day

20

Day

22

Day

27

Day

29

Day

34

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000m2

m 1

m3

m4

m5

m6

m7

m8

m9

m10

m12

m13

Depletion of CD8+ T cells reverts

effects of PCPVELISPOT analysis on splenocytes

Stimulation

Sp

ots

/10

6 c

ell

s

med

ium

MC38

mito

C

i8L (i

rrel

evan

t)

0

200

400

600

PCPV survivor pool

PCPV survivor N°1

PCPV survivor N°2

Pool of naïves mice

PCPV treatment induced MC38-specific

responses in survivors (Day 34)

PARTICULARITIES OF PCPV VS MVA

IF N g am m a

0

50

100

150

200

IP -10 (C X C L 10)

pg

/ml

0

50

100

150

T N F -

0

20

40

60

80

100

IL -12p 70

pg

/ml

0

10

20

30

40

IL -1 b eta

0

20

40

60

R ANT E S (C C L 5)

0

500

1000

1500

IL -18

pg

/ml

MVA

PCPV

buffe

r400

600

800

1000

1200

M IP-1 b eta (C C L 4)

MVA

PCPV

buffe

r0

100

200

300

400

M C P-1 (C C L 2)

MVA

PCPV

buffe

r0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

% g

ate

d in

CD

45

+ T

ILs

MVA

PCPV

buffer

0

5

10

15

20

25

neutrophils

% g

ate

d in

C

D4

5+ T

ILs

MVA

PCPV

buffer

0

10

20

30

40

50

MHCIIlo TAMs

D9: intratumoral injection

D10: take tumor, dissociatecells and enrich CD45+ TILs, characterize cell subsets.

D1: sc injection of MC38 cells

Heterologous prime boost PCPV (itu) / MVA (iv) superior to homologous MVA (itu) / MVA (iv) vaccination

The day after virus injection, tumors were enzymatically dissociated and TILs wereenriched using CD45+ magnetic beads. Subpopulations were identified by flow cytometryaccording to Brauner et al. (AACR 2017 poster N°1672).

PCPV (itu) increased frequencies of neutrophils

and decreased those of MHCIIlo TAMs in MC38 tumors

MVA itu – MVA iv PCPV itu – MVA iv Buffer itu – buffer iv

4 mice/group were injected in both flanks applying 5.105 pfu/flank. After 16h, skin sampleswere taken and mechanically dissociated. Cleared supernatant was analyzed (Luminex).

PCPV increased local of Th1

Cytokines and Chemokines release

13 mice per group were injected with buffer of PCPV as indicated above. Left: mice were treated D-2, D-1, D6 and D13 with anti CD8 antibody (clone 53-6-7, 200 µg/injection, ip). N=1.Depletion of CD8+ T cells was confirmed in blood and spleen Day 14.

PCPV itu + anti CD8 antibody ip

Detection of MC38-specific T cells in splenocytes from pooled or individualsurvivors (D34), after stimulation with MC38 cells treated with Mitomycin C or irrelevant peptide IRL. Control: splenocytes from naïve mice.

A) Detection of HPV16E7-specific T cells in pooled splenocyes from 6 mice (ELISPOT), after stimulation with R9F peptide, specific for HPV16E7. B) Detection of T lymphocytes in dissociated lung tissue from 6 mice / group, according to Remy-Ziller et al, 2017. Appearance of CD3dimCD8dim population after repeated virus treatment. C) Detection of HPV16E7-specific IFN-γ secreting T cells within the CD3dimCD8dim population in the lung of iv treated mice.

ABOUT PCPV AND THE GENERATION OF ITS RECOMBINANTS

Pseudocowpox PCPV (Parapoxvirus)

o PCPV strain TJS (ATCC, VR-634) was isolated from a human case of “Milker’s nodules”.

o Patients with Milker’s nodules did not develop immunity to vaccinia et vice versa.

o Recombinant PCPV were generated by insertion of genes into the non-essential VEGF loci.

o PCPV has detectable but low oncolytic potential in human and murine cells (Ricordel et al., OncoTarget,

paper under revision). Lower oncolytic activity in vitro observed than for the prototype Parapoxvirus ORF.

o Less than 80% pairwise identity with ORFvirus.

From Friedman and Kien, 1963

MVA or PCPVitu, 1x106 pfu• MVA-HPV16E7

• PCPV-HPV16E7 • buffer

D14 D21C57BL/6 mice D1

MVAIV, 1x106 pfu

TC1 cells were sc injected into C57BL/6 mice (10 mice /group). After 14 days of tumor growth, mice were randomized and first intratumorally injected with MVA or PVPV encoding HPV16E7, and one week later intravenously with MVA HPV16E7. Tumor growth and survival were followed.

• MVA-HPV16E7 • PCPV-HPV16E7 • buffer

TC1 cells (HPV16E7+)(5.105 cells), sc

Tumor control, survival

buffer

TC1 tumors - MVA-HPVE7 m 2x (itu, iv)

Tu

mo

r vo

lum

e (

mm

3)

Day

8

Day

10

Day

13

Day

16

Day

18

Day

21

Day

23

Day

25

Day

28

Day

30

Day

32

Day

35

Day

37

Day

39

0

500

1000

1500

2000m2

m 1

m3

m4

m5

m6

m7

m8

m9

m10

TC1 tumors - PCPV-MVA-HPVE7 m (itu, iv)T

um

or

vo

lum

e (

mm

3)

Day

8

Day

10

Day

13

Day

16

Day

18

Day

21

Day

23

Day

25

Day

28

Day

30

Day

32

Day

35

Day

37

Day

39

0

500

1000

1500

2000m 1

m2

m3

m4

m5

m6

m7

m8

m9

m10

TC1 tumors buffer (itu, iv)

Tu

mo

r vo

lum

e (

mm

3)

Day

8

Day

10

Day

13

Day

16

Day

18

Day

21

Day

23

Day

25

Day

28

Day

30

Day

32

Day

35

Day

37

Day

39

0

500

1000

1500

2000m2

m 1

m3

m4

m5

m6

m7

m8

m9

m10