The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past...

26
The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek Sandra Center for Psycholinguistics University of Antwerp

Transcript of The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past...

Page 1: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense

Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek SandraCenter for PsycholinguisticsUniversity of Antwerp

Page 2: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

2

Wilfing on the web, the new British pastime

Wilft u wel eens?

Maar liefst zeven op de tien mensen erkennen dat ze wel eens 'wilfen’

dus dan moet er gewilft worden

Page 3: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

3

How do we inflect novel forms?

• Dual-Mechanism Model- Regular inflection:

• Governed by rules that operate over abstract symbols• Fully productive• Default

- Irregular inflection:• Database of stored word forms• Limited productivity• Similarity-based analogies• Blocks the default

V

V suffix

wilf -edpast

Page 4: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

4

How do we inflect novel forms?

• Similarity-based single-mechanism models- Regular and irregular inflection:

• Analogy-based productivity

wilf => ?

will => wouldkill => killed

fill => filleddelve => delved

Page 5: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

5

Prasada & Pinker 1993• S. Prasada & S. Pinker (1993). Generalisation

of Regular and Irregular Morphological Patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 1-56.

• Past tense acceptability ratings• Rate on a scale from 1 to 7

- Today, I spling, yesterday I splinged- Today, I spling, yesterday I splung- Today, I plip, yesterday I plipped- Today, I plip, yesterday I plup

Page 6: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

6

Prasada & Pinker 1993, stimuli

• Type: distance from irregular/regular verbs• Distances: Prototypical/Intermediate/Distant• Pattern: Vowel change/suffix

Pseudo-irregular verbs Pseudo-regular verbs

Proto. Interm. Dist. Proto. Interm. Dist.

spling fring trisp plip brilth frilg

splungsplinged

frungfringed

trusptrisped

plupplipped

brulthbrilthed

frulgfrilged

Page 7: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

7

Prasada & Pinker 1993: Predictions

• Dual-Mechanism Model- Irregular inflection:

• Negative effect of Phonological Distance from existing irregular verbs

- Regular inflection:• No effect of Phonological Distance from existing regular verbs

• Analogy-based models- Regular and irregular inflection:

• According to Prasada & Pinker (1993) (!): Effect of Phonological Distance from existing regular and irregular verbs

Page 8: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

8

Prasada & Pinker 1993: results

Page 9: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

9

However ...

Is a similarity-based model really bound to fail in strong dissimilarity

conditions?

Page 10: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

10

Memory-Based Modelling

spling

spring cling

stingswing

Page 11: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

11

Memory-Based Modelling

wilf

willfill

killfill

Page 12: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

12

Prasada & Pinker 1993: back to the stimuli

Pseudo-irregular verbs Pseudo-regular verbs

Proto. Interm. Dist. Proto. Interm. Dist.

spling fring trisp plip brilth frilg

splungsplinged

frungfringed

trusptrisped

plupplipped

brulthbrilthed

frulgfrilged

irr: 5.4 irr: 3.3 irr: 0 irr:0 irr:0 irr:0

reg:6.2 reg: 4.5 reg: 2.4 reg: 7.2 reg:0 reg:0

Page 13: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

Keuleers & Sandra (submitted). Similarity and Productivity in the English Past Tense.

Page 14: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

14

Implications

• Findings of Prasada & Pinker can be explained as the result of Relative Support effects in a k-nn model.

• The question whether Phonological Distance from existing verbs in itself has a negative effect on regular/irregular productivity is still unresolved.

Page 15: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

15

A new experiment

• Investigation of the effects of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the productivity of regular and irregular patterns of the Dutch simple past tense.

Page 16: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

Label N (1434) Exemplars

---də 770 (0.537) hoor-hoorde, bel-belde, ruim-ruimde

---tə 339 (0.236) gap-gapte, lok-lokte, gulp-gulpte, wik-wikte

---ə 145 (0.101) laad-laadde, schud-schudde, raad-raadde

-eː- 45 (0.031) prijs-prees, slijt-sleet, grijp-greep

-ɔ- 38 (0.026) zend-zond, zink-zonk, zing-zong, tref-trof

-oː- 32 (0.022) scheer-schoor, vlied-vlood, luik-look

-iː- 16 (0.011) help-hielp, was-wies, slaap-sliep, loop-liep

-ɑ- 14 (0.010) treed-trad, eet-at, vreet-vrat, lees-las

-uː- 7 (0.005) jaag-joeg, zweer-zwoer, vaar-voer

-ɔxt 4 (0.003) koop-kocht, dunk-docht, zoek-zocht

-ɑxt 2 (0.001) breng-bracht, denk-dacht

...

Page 17: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

17

Method

• Past tense acceptability rating task• Stimuli selected on the basis of the output of a

memory-based simulation, with model trained on monomorphemic verbs (CELEX):- Phonological Distance of the nearest neighbor- Relative Support for one of 6 past tense classes (3

regular allomorphs, 3 largest vowel-change classes)

Page 18: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

18

Page 19: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

19

Predictions• Dual-Mechanism Model

- Regular inflection• No effect of Phonological Distance• Possible postive effect of Relative Support (partial

blocking)

- Irregular inflection• Negative effect of Phonological Distance• Positive effect of Relative Support

• K-nn model- Regular and irregular inflection

• Positive effect of Relative Support• No effect of Phonological Distance

Page 20: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

20

Results plot

Page 21: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

21

Results and Discussion

• Positive effect of Relative Support on mean ratings for both regular and irregular forms

• Negative effect of Phonological Distance on mean ratings for irregular forms

• No significant effect of Phonological Distance on mean ratings for regular forms

Page 22: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

22

Results and discussion

• Regular inflection- Both models make the correct predictions.- Preference for k-nn model.

• Irregular inflection- K-nn model makes the wrong prediction.- Preference for Dual-Mechanism Model?

Page 23: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

23

An alternative explanation

• K-nn model is a rather crude implementation of the memory-based approach to cognitive/linguistic modelling.

• Generalized Context Model:(Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 54-65.):- k nearest neighbors = the whole lexicon- Exemplars are weighted by an exponential decay

function

Page 24: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

An alternative explanation

k1 k7 k1 k1k7 k7

Page 25: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

25

An alternative explanation

• In the k-nn model, irregular nearest neighbors that had a relatively high Phonological Distance from the test item might have been too influential in comparison with items that were somewhat further away

• We have not yet explored this possibility.

Page 26: The Role of Phonological Distance and Relative Support on the Productivity of the Dutch Simple Past Tense Bram Vandekerckhove, Emmanuel Keuleers, & Dominiek.

26

Conclusions

• A k-nn model is very good model of regular productivity.

• At the moment, a dual-mechanism model seems to account best for the productivity of the Dutch simple past tense.

• However, a more sophisticated implementation of the memory-based approach might be a better model for this pattern of results.