Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
-
Upload
immigrant-refugee-appellate-center-llc -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
7/28/2019 Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orlando-garcia-adan-a200-151-857-bia-july-3-2013 1/6
Jason A. Flora, EsquireEpsten Cohen Seif & Flora549 S Femng StreetIndanapolis IN 46241
Name: GARCIA-ADAN ORLANDO
U.S. Department utce
Executve ce atn evew
Board ofmmigration ppealOe ofthe Clerk
5107 l.esburg Pk, Sit 2000F Chch Vgna 22041
HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel CHI525 West Van Buren StreetChicago IL 60607
A 200151 ·857
Date of ths notce 7/3/2013
Encle a cpy he Ba ecn an rder n the ave-reerence cae
nclue
Pn Mmbr:kiBh Ch H h Ei
Snceely
D c
Dnna Carr
Che Cerk
ucas
Utm Dk
Cite as: Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
7/28/2019 Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orlando-garcia-adan-a200-151-857-bia-july-3-2013 2/6
7/28/2019 Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orlando-garcia-adan-a200-151-857-bia-july-3-2013 3/6
0 • .
ITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXECTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRTION REVIEW
IMMIGRATION COT
GARCIAA ORLDO
4350 DBNY DR
INDIAPOLIS I 625
IN TE TTER OF
GARCIAD ORDO
525 W. VAN BUREN SITE 500
CHICAGO IL 60607
FILE A 200-1585
LE TO FORWD NO DRESS PROVIDED
DATE: Dec 6 202
X ATTACHED IS A COPY OF TE DECISION OF THE IMMIGRTION DGE THIS DECISION
�IS FINA LESS APPEA IS FILED WITH THE BOD OF IMMIGTION APPEAS
WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF THIS WRITTEN DECISION
SEE THE ENCLOSED FORMS INSTRCTIONS FOR PROPERLY PREPING YOUR APPE.
OR NOTICE OF APPEAL ATTACHED DOCMENTS FEE OR FEE WAIVER REQUEST
ST BE ILED TO BO OF IMMIGRTION APPEAS
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
PO BOX 8530
FALS CHRCH VA 2201
ATTACHED IS A COP OF THE DECISION OF THE IMMIGRATION UDGE AS THE RESLT
OF YOR FAILRE TO APPEAR AT YOR SCHEDED DEPORTATION OR REMOV HEARING
HIS DECISION IS FINL LESS A MOTION TO REOPEN IS FILED IN ACCORDCE
ITH SECTION 22B(c) (3) OF THE IMMIGRATION D NATIONALITY ACT 8 USC
SECTION 252B(c) (3) IN DEPORTATION PROCEEDINGS OR SECTION 20(c) (6),0 usc SECTION 229a(c) (6) IN REMOV PROCEEDINGS IF YOU FILE A MOTION
'O REOPEN YOU MOTION MST BE FILED WITH THIS COUT
OHER
IMMIGRATION COURT
525 W V BREN SITE 500
CHICAGO IL 6060
COT CLERK
IMMIGRATION COT
CC LYNN K HOLNDER Ass� CHIEF CONSEL
525 V BE ST SITE 0
CHICAGO, IL 060
FF
7/28/2019 Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orlando-garcia-adan-a200-151-857-bia-july-3-2013 4/6
0 \
NITED STATES DEPARTMET OF JUSTICEEXCTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMGATIO REIEW
IMMIGRATIO COURTCHICAGO, LLOIS
Fl N A200-5-857 Dat Dcmbr 6 202
n th Mattr :
Orand GAC ADAN
pndnt
)
EMOVAL PROCEDNGS
APPLICAON Mtn t pn n Absentia Rmva Ordr
ON BEALF OF TE RSPONDENT:Pr S4350 Dabny DrvIndanap IN 46254
ON BHALF OF TH GOVEMENTLynn Hllandr Atant Chf CunDpatmnt f Hmand Scurty525 . Van Burn Sut 700Chca IL 60607
DECISON OF TE IMMGTO DGE
Rpndnt a natv and ctzn f Mc w clam av nrd thUntd Sat wtut havn bn npecd and amtd by an Imratn Ocr n
2005 Ar ra m th Man Cuny Indaa jal r tracratd chah wa takn nt cutdy by t Dparmnt f Hmand Scuty n r abut un 22,2011 and rmva prcdn wr ntatd aant m a a ru f unawfun. Ehbt I Ntc t Appar NT A) Th rpndnt wa rad upn thptn f a $6,000 bnd hry thrar See Ntc t EOR An Addr F830
On uy 4 20 I I th Immratn Cut mad a ntc f arn t thrpndnt at th addr had prvdd upn ra m cutdy H wa advd tappa r an nta han n Nvmbr 27 202 a 900 am T han ntc want rtud a undvrabl
On h chdud harn dat f Nvmbr 27 2012 th rpndnt ld tapar Th HS cunl mvd that rd ndutd in absenta, tn tth prna rvc f th NT A n th rpndnt and th rumptn f nma madvry f th harn ntc n upprt f th char f rmvabty th HScun prvdd th curt wth th crd f Dptabe/nadmbl An Frm2 3) Exhbt 3 Th curt rantd th vmnt' tn und th rpndnt
7/28/2019 Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orlando-garcia-adan-a200-151-857-bia-july-3-2013 5/6
rmovabl as chargd and ordrd him rmovd to Mxico n sn. S Oralcision o th migration Jdg
On Octobr I 0, 202 the respondnt throgh cons movd to ropenprocdins sttin that he id to appar r his harin d to consion a to his
harin dat. ccordin to th respondnts motion, h blivd that his hearing was thelowing day. S sondnts Motion to opn."
Analysis
An n bsn remova order ay rescindd, and poceedings reopened if thealin demonstrats that the ire to appear was de to xcptiona circustances" or lack of notice INA§ 240()(5)() Th respondnt has the urden of proving exceptional circmstancs," which mst b sppored by adavits or other evidentiaymaterial" S 8 § 0033((3). xceptiona circmstances are dened ascompellin" ones beyond the contro o the alin INA§ 240(e)() he
circmstances mst b at last as compeing as the lowing batery or extremecruety to the aien or any chid or parent of the alien, serios iness of the aien or serious ilness or death of the spouse, child or parent o the alien" Id. An migration Jdge [J] st exaine the totality o the circmstances to determine whether circumstances rise to the level ofextraordinary." Mr of W-F-, 21 &N Dec 503, 509BIA 1996)
A mistae as to the heain date does not rise to the leve of copelling circstances Urosgu v. Gonzls 45 .3d 660, 663 (7th ir 2005). ven whenthe mista is a result of a consed interpretation, it wil not rise to te evel ofcompeling circumstances ifthe aiens attoey or the ain knew the heing date Id
at 664. n rosgu the eventh ircuit reasoned that the alien could have taken anuber of precautions to insure her presence at her hearin Id
This cou nds that e respondent in the present case has iled to show exceptional circumsces as dened in section 240e)() of the NA. espondent sttesin his otion hat he beieved tat his heang date was Noveer 28 202 notNoveber 27 2012. Based pon e holding in Urosgu a consed intepreation to e date of the herin does not equate to exceptional circumstances if the respondentor aoey was provided with e coect heaing date Urosgu, 415 3d at 664. uhermore, respondent's consion regarding the date of the hearing ils to se to thelevel o compelling" circmstances beyond the control of the aien" S NA§
240(e)(I). he respondent received wen notice of the hearing date, the notice clearlyinmed hi of the date, time and ocation o the hearing, and the NT A provided therespondent with the conseences r iin to appr
his cou concdes that, under the totaity of the circustances respondent hanot show exceptional circstances or ack of notice warranting reopening ofproceedings he rasons cited in sppot of reopening pale in comparison to accetedexceptional circumstaces, sch as seios illness or death of the spouse, chid or parent
2
7/28/2019 Orlando Garcia-Adan, A200 151 857 (BIA July 3, 2013)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orlando-garcia-adan-a200-151-857-bia-july-3-2013 6/6
nv PA
·' o h n" o bt o xtm cu to th n ccod own od w b ntd
ORDR
IS RBY ORDRD h h spondn's moton to opn s DD
3
,