Form: RWPRR401-B C C S 通函

1

Form: RWPRR401-B

C C S 通函 Circular 中国船级社

认证处（2008 年）通函第 010 号总第 142 号

生效日期：2008 年 7 月 22 日发各分社、总部相关处室，各船舶管理公司

关于执行 MSC.1/Circ. 1253；MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 5；MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 6 ；MSC.1/Circ.1235 的通知

海安会及海上环境保护委员会通过的通函， MSC.1/Circ.1253,

MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 5 ，MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 6 和 MSC.1/Circ.1235 要求各缔约国政府

及国际组织关注通函要求并遵照执行。

一、 MSC.1/Circ. 1253--船舶技术操作和保养手册（2007 年 10 月 26 日），该通函介绍

了产生的背景、起因，并注意到了该有求可以通过 ISM 的执行来落实。

1、该通函要求，各主管机关应该充分认识船上具备可用的最新、准确和便于使用的船

上技术操作和维护手册的必要性；

2、建议将 IACS 第 71 号建议案用作船上技术操作和维护手册的范本；

3、建议船上技术操作和维护手册应以船上的工作语言写成。若该工作语言既非英文、

法文，也非西班牙文，则应提供一份英文或法文或西班牙文的译文；和

4、认识到船舶系统可能由若干单个设备组成，鼓励船舶设计单位和船厂提供说明完

整的船舶系统的操作以及该船舶系统应急操作的图表和图纸，并提请船东、船长、

船厂、认可的组织，特别是对安全至关重要的船用设备生产商，注意上述事项。

详见后附 MSC.1/Circ. 1253。

二、MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 5—公司履行 ISM CODE 的导则，该通函为协助船公司更好、

更有效地履行 ISM CODE 提供了新的导则。2007 年 7 月 9-13 日海上环境保护委员会

第 56 届会议和海安会 2007 年 10 月 3-12 日第 83 届会议一致同意，为更好协助公司

有效地履行 ISM CODE 而对现有的导则进行评审，制定新的导则。详见后附

MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 5。

三、MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 6—2007 年 7 月 9-13 日海上环境保护委员会第 56 届会议和

海安会 2007 年 10 月 3-12 日第 83 届会议一致认为公司指定人员在公司内履行安全管

理体系方面起着非常关键的作用，该通函为船公司具有 ISM CODE 规定职责的指定人

员的资质、培训和经历提供了指南。详见后附 MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 6。

2

四、MSC.1/Circ.1235—船上人员保安培训和熟悉指南，第 83 届会议（2007 年 10 月 3

日至 12 日）上注意到 STW 分委会在其第 38 次会议（2007 年 1 月 22 日至 26 日）上

编制的 STCW 公约和 STCW 规则的修正案草案，目的是将有关船上有或无指定保安

职责人员的保安培训和熟悉培训的规定纳入其中。审议了 STW 分委会的建议案，即

将修正案草案的相关要素作为 ISPS 规则有关规定的导则予以分发，以增强海上保安

和促进 SOLAS 第 XI-2 章和 ISPS 规则的一致和协调实施。详见后附 MSC.1/Circ.1235。

请各分社相关部门组织审核员认真学习，并且及时通知相关船舶管理公司，我社

审核员在审核时，应确认船公司或者船舶满足通函要求。附件：MSC.1/Circ.1253, MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 5, MSC-MEPC.7/Circ. 6, MSC.1/Circ.1235及相关译文。

I:\CIRC\MSC-MEPC\7\5.doc

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR Telephone: 020 7587 3152 Fax: 020 7587 3210

IMO

E

Ref. T2-HES/4.2 MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.5

T5-MEPC/1.01 19 October 2007

GUIDELINES FOR THE OPERATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION

OF THE INTERNATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ISM) CODE BY COMPANIES

1 The Maritime Safety Committee at its eighty-second session (29 November to 8 December 2006) and the Marine Environment Protection Committee at its fifty-sixth session (9 to 13 July 2007) considered the report of the Group of Independent Experts on the impact of the ISM Code and its effectiveness in the enhancement of safety of life at sea and protection of the marine environment and agreed that guidelines and associated training should be developed to assist companies and seafarers in improving the implementation of the Code. 2 The Marine Environment Protection Committee at its fifty-sixth session (9 to 13 July 2007) and the Maritime Safety Committee at its eighty-third session (3 to 12 October 2007) further agreed that it was essential to review the existing guidelines and develop new guidelines to assist companies in effective and efficient operational implementation of the ISM Code. 3 Accordingly, the Committees approved the guidelines for operational implementation of the ISM Code by Companies as set out in the annex. 4 Member Governments and international organizations concerned are recommended to bring this circular to the attention of all parties concerned.

***

MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.5


ANNEX

GUIDELINES FOR THE OPERATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ISM) CODE

BY COMPANIES 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The ISM Code 1.1.1 The International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (International Safety Management (ISM) Code) was adopted by the Organization by resolution A.741(18) and became mandatory by virtue of the entry into force on 1 July 1998 of SOLAS chapter IX on Management for the Safe Operation of Ships. The ISM Code provides an international standard for the safe management and operation of ships and for pollution prevention. 1.1.2 The Maritime Safety Committee, at its seventy-third session, adopted amendments to chapter IX of SOLAS by resolution MSC.99(73), and to sections 1, 7, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of the ISM Code by resolution MSC.104(73). 1.1.3 The ISM Code requires that Companies establish safety objectives as described in section 1.2 of the ISM Code, and in addition that the Companies develop, implement and maintain a safety management system which includes functional requirements as listed in section 1.4 of the ISM Code. 1.1.4 The application of the ISM Code should support and encourage the development of a safety culture in shipping. Success factors for the development of a safety culture are, inter alia, commitment, values and beliefs. 2 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 2.1 Definitions The terms used in these Guidelines have the same meaning as those given in the ISM Code. 2.2 Scope and Application 2.2.1 These Guidelines establish the basic principles for:

.1 reviewing the safety management system by a Company; .2 the role of the Designated Person under the ISM Code; .3 reporting and analysing of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences

(including near-misses); and .4 performing internal audits and management reviews,

and do not reduce or replace the Company�s responsibilities outlined in the ISM Code.

MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.5 ANNEX Page 2


3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 3.1 The ISM Code requires that Companies establish safety objectives as described in section 1.2 of the ISM Code, and in addition that Companies develop, implement and maintain a safety management system (SMS) which includes functional requirements as listed in section 1.4 of the ISM Code. 3.2 Given the self-regulatory principles of the ISM Code, the internal verification and review processes are key elements in the implementation of each SMS. The Company should consider the outcome of internal audits, internal SMS reviews and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences to enhance the effectiveness of operations and procedures within their SMS. To comply with the Code, the Company should:

.1 designate a person or persons with direct access to the highest level of management who should monitor the safe operation of each ship (section 4);

.2 ensure that adequate resources and shore-based support are provided to enable the

designated person or persons to carry out their functions (section 3.3); .3 define and document the master�s responsibility with regard to reviewing the

safety management system and reporting its deficiencies to the shore-based management (section 5.1);

.4 establish procedures for reporting and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and

hazardous occurrences (section 9.1); .5 periodically evaluate the effectiveness of, and when needed, review the safety

management system (section 12.2); and .6 perform internal audits to verify whether safety management activities comply

with the requirements of the safety management system (section 12.1). 4 DESIGNATED PERSON 4.1 A key role, as identified by the ISM Code, in the effective implementation of a safety management system is that of the Designated Person. This is the person based ashore whose influence and responsibilities should significantly affect the development and implementation of a safety culture within the Company. 4.2 The designated person should verify and monitor all safety and pollution prevention activities in the operation of each ship. This monitoring should include, at least, the following internal processes:

.1 communication and implementation of the safety and environmental protection policy;

.2 evaluation and review of the effectiveness of the safety management system; .3 reporting and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences;

MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.5 ANNEX

Page 3


.4 organizing and monitoring of internal audits; .5 appropriate revisions to the SMS; and .6 ensuring that adequate resources and shore-based support are provided.

4.3 To enable the designated person to carry out this role effectively, the Company should provide adequate resources and shore-based support. These include:

.1 personnel resources; .2 material resources; .3 any training required; .4 clearly defined and documented responsibility and authority; and .5 authority for reporting non-conformities and observations to the highest level of

management. 4.4 Designated Person(s) should have the qualifications, training and experience as set out in MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.6, to effectively verify and monitor the implementation of the safety management system in compliance with the ISM Code. 5 REVIEW OF THE SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Company should, when needed, review and evaluate the effectiveness of the SMS in accordance with procedures established by the company. Further, it is one of the master�s responsibilities to review the safety management system and to report its deficiencies to the shore-based management. Shore based and ship board internal audits should be performed at least once a year. 5.2 Management reviews support companies� efforts in achieving the general safety management objectives as defined in section 1.2.2 of the ISM Code. Based upon the results of such reviews, the Company should implement measures to improve further the effectiveness of the system. The review should be performed on a periodical basis or when needed, e.g., in case of serious system failures. Any deficiencies found during the management review should be provided with appropriate corrective action taking into account the Company�s objectives. The results of such reviews should be brought to the attention of all personnel involved in a formal way. The management review should at least take into account the results of the internal audits, any non-conformities reported by the personnel, the master�s reviews, analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences and any other evidence of possible failure of the SMS, like non-conformities by external parties, PSC inspection reports, etc. 6 REPORTING AND ANALYSING OF NON-CONFORMITIES, OBSERVATIONS,

ACCIDENTS AND HAZARDOUS OCCURRENCES 6.1 The SMS should contain procedures to ensure that non-conformities, observations and hazardous occurrences are reported to the responsible person of the management. The Company should have a system in place for recording, investigating, evaluating, reviewing and analysing such reports, and to take action as appropriate.



6.2 The system should ensure such reports are reviewed and evaluated by the responsible person(s) in order to determine appropriate corrective action and to ensure that recurrences are avoided. The evaluation of reports may result in:

.1 appropriate corrective actions; .2 amendments to existing procedures and instructions; and .3 development of new procedures and instructions.

6.3 The responsible person should properly monitor the follow-up and closing-out of the non-conformities/deficiency reports. The receipt of reports should be acknowledged to those persons who have raised the reports. This should include the status of the report and any decisions made. 6.4 The Company should encourage the reporting of near-misses to maintain and improve safety awareness (see MSC/Circ.1015). A near miss can be defined as hazardous situation where an accident was avoided. The reporting and analysis of such incidents are essential for an effective risk assessment by the Company, especially where accident information is not available. 7 INTERNAL AUDITS 7.1 Companies should carry out internal audits at least once per year to verify whether shore-based and shipboard activities comply with the SMS. These internal verifications should be prepared and conducted in accordance with procedures established by the Company. The procedures should at least consider the following elements:

.1 responsibilities; .2 competence and selection of auditors; .3 audit scheduling; .4 preparing and planning the audit; .5 executing the audit; .6 audit report; and .7 corrective action follow-up.

8 QUALIFICATIONS, TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE 8.1 The ISM Code requires the Company to ensure that all personnel involved in the Company�s SMS have an adequate understanding of relevant rules, regulations, codes and guidelines. The Company should ensure that all personnel have the qualifications, training and experience that may be required in support of the SMS.

____________



IMO

E

Ref. T2-HES/4.2 MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.6

T5-MEPC/1.01 19 October 2007

GUIDANCE ON THE QUALIFICATIONS, TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE NECESSARY FOR UNDERTAKING THE ROLE OF THE DESIGNATED PERSON UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE

INTERNATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ISM) CODE 1 The Marine Environment Protection Committee at its fifty-sixth session (9 to 13 July 2007) and the Maritime Safety Committee at its eighty-third session (3 to 12 October 2007) noted that the Maritime Safety Committee, at its seventy-fourth session (30 May to 8 June 2001), agreed that the Designated Person has a key role in the development and implementation of the safety management system within a shipping company with a view to ensuring safety at sea, prevention of human injury or loss life, and avoidance of damage to the environment, in particular to the marine environment and to property. 2 The Committees also agreed that there was an urgent need to provide guidance to shipping companies on the qualifications, training and experience for undertaking the role of Designated Person under provisions of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code. 3 Accordingly, the Committees developed Guidance on the experience, qualifications and training for undertaking the role of Designated Person under the provisions of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code as set out in the annex. 4 Member Governments and international organizations concerned are recommended to bring this circular to the attention of all parties concerned.

***

MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.6


ANNEX

GUIDANCE ON THE QUALIFICATIONS, TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE NECESSARY FOR UNDERTAKING THE ROLE OF THE DESIGNATED PERSON UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE

INTERNATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ISM) CODE 1 INTRODUCTION

The present Guidance applies to persons undertaking the role of the Designated Person under the provisions of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code. 2 QUALIFICATIONS 2.1 Designated Person should have a minimum of formal education as follows:

.1 qualifications from a tertiary institution recognized by the Administration or by the recognized organization, within a relevant field of management, engineering or physical science, or

.2 qualifications and seagoing experience as a certified ship officer pursuant to the

International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, as amended, or

.3 other formal education combined with not less than three years practical senior

level experience in ship management operations. 3 TRAINING 3.1 Designated Person should have undergone training relating to safety management elements in compliance with the requirements of the ISM Code, particularly with regard to:

.1 knowledge and understanding of the ISM Code; .2 mandatory rules and regulations; .3 applicable codes, guidelines and standards as appropriate; .4 assessment techniques of examining, questioning, evaluating and reporting; .5 technical or operational aspects of safety management; .6 appropriate knowledge of shipping and shipboard operations; .7 participation in at least one marine-related management system audit; and .8 effective communications with shipboard staff and senior management.



4 EXPERIENCE 4.1 Designated Person should have experience to:

.1 present ISM matters to the highest level of management and gain sustained support for safety management system improvements;

.2 determine whether the safety management system elements meet the requirements

of the ISM Code; .3 determine the effectiveness of the safety management system within the Company

and the ship by using established principles of internal audit and management review to ensure compliance with rules and regulations;

.4 assess the effectiveness of the safety management system in ensuring compliance

with other rules and regulations which are not covered by statutory and classification surveys and enabling verification of compliance with these rules and regulations;

.5 assess whether the safe practices recommended by the Organization,

Administrations, classification societies, other international bodies and maritime industry organizations to promote a safety culture had been taken into account; and

.6 gather and analyse data from hazardous occurrences, hazardous situations, near

misses, incidents and accidents and apply the lessons learnt to improve the safety management system within the Company and its ships.

5 COMPANY REQUIREMENTS AND RECORDS 5.1 The Company should provide training courses covering qualification, training and experience and the appropriate procedures connected to compliance with the ISM Code including practical training and continuous updating. The Company should also provide documentary evidence that the Designated Person has the relevant qualification, training and experience to undertake the duties under the provisions of the ISM Code.

___________

I:\CIRC\MSC\01\1235.doc


IMO

E

Ref. T2-MSS/2.11.1 MSC.1/Circ.1235 T2/4.2 21 October 2007 GUIDELINES ON SECURITY-RELATED TRAINING AND FAMILIARIZATION FOR

SHIPBOARD PERSONNEL 1 The Maritime Safety Committee (the Committee), at its eighty-third session (3 to 12 October 2007) noted the draft amendments to the STCW Convention and the STCW Code prepared by the STW Sub-Committee, at its thirty-eighth session (22 to 26 January 2007), with a view to including therein, inter alia, provisions with respect to security-related training and familiarization training for shipboard personnel without and with designated security duties. The Committee also considered the recommendations of the STW Sub-Committee for the dissemination of related elements of the draft amendments as guidance on the corresponding provisions of the ISPS Code so as to enhance maritime security and encourage consistent and harmonized implementation of SOLAS chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code. 2 The Committee recalled that the current plan was to adopt the aforesaid amendments at a future date as part of the comprehensive review of the STCW Convention and the STCW Code presently undertaken by the STW Sub-Committee. It would therefore be advisable to provide information to SOLAS Contracting Governments and STCW Parties on the direction that issues related to the training and familiarization for shipboard personnel were expected to take, so as to enable them to adjust their national requirements, programmes and practices, thus ensuing convergence. The Committee agreed that such an approach, in turn, would also ensure the smooth introduction of, and transition to, the envisaged new requirements. 3 The Committee also agreed that, if Governments were to endeavour to align their requirements with those envisaged in the draft amendments, it would be reasonable to expect that shipboard personnel would encounter less difficulties in the recognition and acceptance of their training and experience acquired prior to the entry into force of the contemplated amendments. 4 As a result the Committee approved Guidance on security-related training and familiarization training for shipboard personnel (the Guidance), as set out in annex. 5 The Committee agreed that:

.1 the sole purpose of the Guidance was to assist SOLAS Contracting Governments in the implementation of the provisions of ISPS Code, section A/13.3, and paragraphs B/13.3 and B/13.4;

MSC.1/Circ.1235 - 2 -


.2 the Guidance does not establish any basis on which those exercising either control

and compliance measures pursuant to the provisions of SOLAS regulation XI-2/9; or control pursuant to the provisions of STCW article X or STCW regulation I/4; may request or require the production of documentary evidence attesting that shipboard personnel are meeting the requirements outlined in the Guidance; and

.3 the Guidance does not establish any basis on which a SOLAS Contracting

Government may require shipboard personnel serving on board ships entering ports located in its territory to meet the requirements outlined in the Guidance.

6 The Committee also reaffirmed the advice given on the issue of training and certification, during its seventy-seventh session (28 May to 6 June 2003), namely that as an interim measure, the International Ship Security Certificate should be accepted as prima facie evidence that training had been conducted in accordance with the ISPS Code. The flag State was responsible for deciding how that training was to be conducted, and if any additional certification was required. If a port State control inspection detected a lack of training, further action could be taken. 7 SOLAS Contracting Governments are invited to bring the Guidelines to the attention of all parties concerned with matters addressed therein. 8 SOLAS Contracting Governments, international organizations and non-governmental organizations with consultative status which encounter difficulties with the implementation of the Guidance should bring, at the earliest opportunity, the matter to the attention of the Committee for consideration of the issues involved and decision on the actions to be taken.

***

MSC.1/Circ.1235


ANNEX

GUIDELINES ON SECURITY-RELATED TRAINING AND FAMILIARIZATION FOR SHIPBOARD PERSONNEL

1 APPLICATION 1.1 The present Guidance applies to shipboard personnel other than ship security officers employed or engaged on a ship which is required to comply with the provisions of SOLAS chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code. 1.2 The term �shipboard personnel� means: (1) master and the members of the crew or other persons employed or engaged in any capacity on board a ship on the business of that ship, including high-speed craft; (2) in the case of special purpose ships1, the crew2 and the special purpose personnel3; and (3) in the case of mobile offshore drilling units not on location, the special personnel4 and the maritime crew5; and excludes passengers. 2 GENERAL PRINCIPLES 2.1 Shipboard personnel are not security experts and it is not the aim of the provisions of the Guidance to convert them into security specialists. 2.2 Shipboard personnel should receive adequate security-related training or instruction and familiarization training so as to acquire the required knowledge and understanding to perform their assigned duties and to contribute collectively to the enhancement of maritime security. 2.3 Shipboard personnel should receive adequate security-related training or instruction at least one time in their career. 2.4 The security-related familiarization training should be conducted by the ship security officer or an equally qualified person. 3 TERMINOLOGY 3.1 ISPS Code, section A/9.4.7, states that the ship security plan shall address the �duties of shipboard personnel assigned security responsibilities and of other shipboard personnel on security aspects�. ISPS Code, section A/13.3 and paragraph B/13.3, make reference to �shipboard personnel having specific security duties and responsibilities� and ISPS Code paragraph B/13.4 makes reference, in relation to ISPS Code, paragraph B/13.3, to �all other shipboard personnel�.

1 Special purpose ship is defined in paragraph 1.3.4 of Code of Safety for Special Purpose Ships adopted

by resolution A.534(13) and amended by MSC/Circs.446, 478 and 739 and resolution MSC.183(79) referred to below as the SPS Code. MSC/Circ.739 includes new amendments to the SPS Code and consolidates the ones adopted under cover of MSC/Circs.446 and 478.

2 Crew is defined in paragraph 1.3.1 of SPS Code. 3 Special purpose personnel is defined in paragraph 1.3.3 of SPS Code. 4 Special personnel is defined in paragraph 2.1.12 of Recommendations on training of personnel on mobile

offshore drilling units (MoUs) adopted by resolution A.891(21) and referred to below as the MoUs training recommendations.

5 Maritime crew is defined in paragraph 2.1.13 of the MoUs training recommendations.

MSC.1/Circ.1235 ANNEX Page 2


3.2 As a result this Guidance uses the expression shipboard personnel �with designated security duties� to denote those having specific security duties and responsibilities in accordance with the ship security plan. The expression shipboard personnel �without designated security duties� is used to denote all other shipboard personnel. 4 SHIPBOARD PERSONNEL WITHOUT DESIGNATED SECURITY DUTIES 4.1 Basic training or instruction in security awareness 4.1.1 Shipboard personnel without designated security duties should be able to demonstrate competence to undertake the tasks, duties and responsibilities listed in column 1 of Table 1. 4.1.2 The level of knowledge of the subjects listed in column 2 of table 1 should be sufficient to enable the person to collectively contribute to the enhancement of maritime security. 4.1.3 Persons who have satisfactorily completed an approved security awareness training based on the knowledge, understanding and proficiency (KUP) set out in table 1, should be considered to have met the requirements. Those completing such training should be provided with documentary evidence to this effect to the satisfaction of the relevant SOLAS Contracting Government. 4.2 Security-related familiarization training 4.2.1 Before being assigned to shipboard duties, shipboard personnel without designated security duties should receive security-related familiarization training to be able to:

.1 report a security incident; .2 know the procedures to follow when they recognize a security threat; and .3 take part in security-related emergency and contingency procedures.

4.3 Standing vis-à-vis the requirements of the ISPS Code 4.3.1 Shipboard personnel without designated security duties which comply with the requirements of paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2 should be considered as having met the requirements of ISPS Code, paragraph B/13.4. 5 SHIPBOARD PERSONNEL WITH DESIGNATED SECURITY DUTIES 5.1 Training or instruction in designated security duties 5.1.1 Shipboard personnel with designated security duties should be able to demonstrate competence to undertake the tasks, duties and responsibilities listed in column 1 of table 2. 5.1.2 The level of knowledge of the subjects listed in column 2 of table 2 should be sufficient to enable the person to perform their designated security duties.

MSC.1/Circ.1235 ANNEX

Page 3


5.1.3 Persons who have satisfactorily completed an approved training based on the knowledge, understanding and proficiency (KUP) set out in table 2, should be considered to have met the requirements. Those completing such training should be provided with documentary evidence to this effect to the satisfaction of the relevant SOLAS Contracting Government. 5.2 Security-related familiarization training 5.2.1 Shipboard personnel with designated security duties should, before being assigned such duties, receive security-related familiarization training in their assigned duties and responsibilities taking into account the provisions of the ship security plan. 5.3 Standing vis-à-vis the requirements of the ISPS Code 5.3.1 Shipboard personnel with designated security duties who comply with the requirements of paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 should be considered as having met the requirements of ISPS Code, section A/13.3 and paragraph B/13.3. 6 ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DEMONSTRATING COMPETENCY 6 SOLAS Contracting Governments may allow shipboard personnel to demonstrate competence to undertake the tasks, duties and responsibilities listed in column 1 of table 1 or 2, as the case may be, by:

.1 approved seagoing service as shipboard personnel without or with designated

security duties, as the case may be, for a period of at least six months in total during the preceding three years provided the period of six months has been accrued after 1 July 2004; or

.2 having performed security functions after 1 July 2004 considered to be equivalent

to the seagoing service required in paragraph 6.1; or .3 passing an approved test; or .4 successfully completing approved training.



TABLE 1

KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING AND PROFICIENCIES (KUPS) RELEVANT TO SECURITY AWARENESS

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4

Competence Knowledge,

understanding and proficiency

Methods for demonstrating

competence

Criteria for evaluating competence

Contribute to the enhancement of maritime security through heightened awareness

Basic working knowledge of maritime security terms and definitions Basic knowledge of international maritime security policy and responsibilities of Governments, Companies and persons Basic knowledge of maritime security levels and their impact on security measures and procedures aboard ship and in port facilities Basic knowledge of security reporting procedures Basic knowledge of security related contingency plans

Assessment of evidence obtained from approved instruction or during attendance at an approved course

Requirements relating to enhanced maritime security are correctly identified.

Recognition of security threats

Basic knowledge of techniques used to circumvent security measures Basic knowledge enabling recognition of potential security threats Basic knowledge enabling recognition of weapons, dangerous substances, and devices and awareness of the damage they can cause Basic knowledge in handling security related information and security related communications


Maritime security threats are correctly identified.

Understanding of the need for and methods of maintaining security awareness and vigilance

Basic knowledge of training, drill and exercise requirements under relevant conventions and codes


Requirements relating to enhanced maritime security are correctly identified.

MSC.1/Circ.1235 ANNEX

Page 5


TABLE 2

KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING AND PROFICIENCIES (KUPS) RELEVANT TO SHIPBOARD PERSONNEL WITH DESIGNATED SECURITY DUTIES


Competence Knowledge, understanding and proficiency


competence


Maintain the conditions set forth in a ship security plan

Working knowledge of maritime security terms and definitions Knowledge of international maritime security policy and responsibilities of Governments, Companies and persons Knowledge of maritime security levels and their impact on security measures and procedures aboard ship and in the port facilities Knowledge of security reporting procedures Knowledge of procedures for drills and exercises Knowledge of the procedures for conducting inspections and surveys and for the control and monitoring of security activities specified in a ship security plan Knowledge of security related contingency plans and the procedures for responding to security threats or breaches of security, including provisions for maintaining critical operations of the ship/port interface


Procedures and actions are in accordance with the principles established by the ISPS Code and SOLAS Convention. Legislative requirements relating to security are correctly identified. Communications within the area of responsibility are clear and understood.

Recognition of security risks and threats

Knowledge of security documentation including the Declaration of Security

Knowledge of techniques used to circumvent security measures

Knowledge enabling recognition of potential security threats Knowledge enabling recognition of weapons, dangerous substances, and devices and awareness of the damage they can cause

Knowledge of crowd management and control techniques, where appropriate


Procedures and actions are in accordance with the principles established by the ISPS Code and SOLAS Convention.




Competence Knowledge, understanding and proficiency


competence


Knowledge in handling security related information and security related communications Knowledge of the methods for physical searches and non-intrusive inspections

Undertake regular security inspections of the ship

Knowledge of the techniques for monitoring restricted areas

Knowledge of controlling access to the ship and to restricted areas on board ship

Knowledge of methods for effective monitoring of deck areas and areas surrounding the ship

Knowledge of inspection methods relating to the cargo and ship�s stores

Knowledge of methods for controlling the embarkation, disembarkation and access while on board of persons and their effects



Proper usage of security equipment and systems, if any

General knowledge of various types of security equipment and systems, including their limitations

Knowledge of the need for testing, calibrating, and maintaining security systems and equipment, particularly whilst at sea


Equipment and systems operations are carried out in accordance with established equipment operating instructions and taking into account the limitations of the equipment and systems.


___________

海安会通函 MSC.1/Circ.1253 （2007 年 10 月 26 日）

船上技术操作和维护手册

1 海上安全委员会在其 83 届会议（2007 年 10 月 3 日至 12 日）上审议了关于所有相关利

益方有必要注意船员获得最新、准确的和便于使用的船上技术操作和维护手册的重要性，特

别是对安全至关重要的船用设备的建议案。 2 本委员会注意到存在一个全球性的和竞争性的船用设备市场并且希望船员能快速掌握安

装于船上的不同设备并有效地操作。同时，希望船员将能够在受很少限制的情况下在各船舶

间流动，这种灵活性对有效管理人力资源是必要的。因此，船员可能会接触到各种各样安装

于船上的设备。 3 本委员会还注意到船上保持最新和准确的操作和维护手册可通过国际安全管理规则

（ISM）的实施和强化机制得以实现。 4 本委员会进一步注意到 IACS 第 71 号建议案《船上技术手册制订导则》（2000 年 9 月）

并且同意该导则为负责制订该手册的人员提供了有用的参考。 5 鉴于前述事项，请各成员国政府： .1 认识船上具备可用的最新、准确和便于使用的船上技术操作和维护手册的必要性；

.2 建议将 IACS 第 71 号建议案用作船上技术操作和维护手册的范本；

.3 建议船上技术操作和维护手册应以船上的工作语言写成。若该工作语言既非英文、法

文，也非西班牙文，则应提供一份英文或法文或西班牙文的译文；和 .4 认识到船舶系统可能由若干单个设备组成，鼓励船舶设计单位和船厂提供说明完整的

船舶系统的操作以及该船舶系统应急操作的图表和图纸，并提请船东、船长、船厂、认可的组织，特别是对安全至关重要的船用设备生产商，注意上

述事项。

1/4

MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.5 通函（2007 年 10 月 19 日）

公司执行国际安全管理（ISM）规则操作指南

1 海上安全委员会在其第 82 届会议（2006 年 11 月 29 日至 12 月 8 日）和海上环境保护委

员会在其第 56 届会议（2007 年 7 月 9 日至 13 日）上审议了独立专家组关于 ISM 规则的影

响及其增强海上人命安全和海洋环境保护有效性的报告，同意应制定指南和相关的培训以协

助公司和海员改善本规则的执行。

2 海上环境保护委员会在其第 56 届会议（2007 年 7 月 9 日至 13 日）和海上安全委员会在

其第 83 届会议（2007 年 10 月 3 日至 12 日）上进一步同意有必要评审现有指南并制定新的

指南以协助公司有效执行 ISM 规则。

3 为此，本委员会批准了公司执行 ISM 规则操作指南，其文本载于附件。

4 建议各成员国政府和相关国际组织提请所有各方注意本通函。

2/4

附件

公司执行国际安全管理（ISM）规则操作指南

1 引言 1.1 ISM 规则 1.1.1 《国际船舶安全营运和防污染管理规则》(国际安全管理（ISM）规则)由本组织

以 A.741（18）决议通过，并在 SOLAS 第 IX 章“船舶安全营运管理”于 1998 年 7 月 1 日

生效时成为强制性。ISM 规则提供一个船舶安全营运及防污染管理的国际标准。 1.1.2 海上安全委员会在其第 73 届会议上以海安会 MSC.99（73）和 MSC.104（73）

决议分别通过了 SOLAS 第 IX 章和 ISM 规则第 1、7、13、14、15 和 16 节的修正案。 1.1.3 ISM 规则要求公司制定 ISM 规则第 1.2 节所述的安全目标，此外，公司制定、

实施和保持 ISM 规则第 1.4 节所述功能要求的安全管理体系。 1.1.4 ISM 规则的应用应支持和鼓励航运安全文化的发展。发展安全文化的成功因素包

括承诺、价值和信念。 2 范围和适用 2.1 定义本指南所用的术语与 ISM 规则中的术语含义相同。 2.2 范围和适用 2.2.1 本指南制定以下基本原则：

.1 公司评审安全管理体系；

.2 ISM 规则中指定人员的职责；

.3 不合格、事故和险情（包括侥幸脱险）的报告和分析；和

.4 实施内审和管理评审，而不减少或代替 ISM 规则中规定的公司职责。 3 安全管理体系的制定 3.1 ISM 规则要求公司制定 ISM 规则第 1.2 节所述的安全目标，此外，公司制定、实

施和保持 ISM 规则第 1.4 节所述功能要求的安全管理体系（SMS）。 3.2 鉴于 ISM 规则的自我管理原则，内部验证和评审是实施每个 SMS 的关键因素。

公司应考虑内审、内部 SMS 评审和不合格、事故及险情分析的结果，以增强 SMS 内操作和

程序的有效性。为了符合本规则，公司应：

3/4

.1 指定 1 名或多名人员，他(他们) 能与高级管理层直接联系并监控每艘船舶的

安全营运（第 4 节）； .2 确保提供足够资源和岸基地的支持，使指定人员能履行其职能（第 3.3 节）； .3 以文件明确地规定船长评审安全管理体系并向岸上基地管理层报告缺陷的责

任（第 5.1 节）； .4 制定报告和分析不合格、事故与险情的程序（第 9.1 节）； .5 定期评估安全管理体系的有效性并在需要时进行评审（第 12.2 节）；和 .6 实施内审以验证安全管理活动是否符合安全管理体系的要求（第 12.1 节）。

4 指定人员 4.1 ISM 规则标识的安全管理体系有效实施的关键职责是指定人员的职责。该人员位

于岸基地，其权力和责任能显著影响公司内安全文化的发展和实施。 4.2 指定人员应验证和监控每艘船舶营运的所有安全和防污染活动。该监控应至少包

括以下内部过程： .1 安全和环境保护方针的通信和实施； .2 安全管理体系有效性的评估和评审； .3 不合格、事故和险情的报告和分析； .4 内审的组织和监控； .5 对 SMS 的适当修订； .6 确保提供足够的资源和岸基地支持。

4.3 为了使指定人员有效履行此职责，公司应提供足够的资源和岸基地支持，包括：

.1 人力资源；

.2 物质资源；

.3 需要的培训；

.4 明确规定和文件化的责任和权力；和

.5 向高管理层报告不合格和观察项的权力。 4.4 指定人员应具备 MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.6 通函规定的资格、培训和经历，以按 ISM 规

则有效验证和监控安全管理体系的实施。 5 安全管理体系的评审 5.1 公司应在需要时按公司制定的程序评审和评估 SMS 的有效性。此外，船长负责评

审安全管理体系并向岸基管理层报告其缺陷。应至少每年实施一次岸基和船上内审。 5.2 管理评审支持公司致力于实现 ISM 规则第 1.2.2 节规定的一般安全管理目标。根

据评审结果，公司应实施措施进一步提高体系的有效性。应定期或需要时（如严重的体系缺

陷）实行评审。应给管理评审发现的任何缺陷制定适当的纠正措施，并考虑公司目标。应使

用正式方式使所有相关人员注意评审结果。管理评审应至少考虑内审结果、人员报告的不合

格、船长评审、不合格、事故和险情的分析、以及 SMS 潜在缺陷的任何证据，比如外部方

的不合格和 PSC 检查报告等。

4/4

6 不合格、观察项、事故和险情的报告和分析 6.1 SMS 应包括确保把不合格、观察项、事故和险情报告给管理层负责人员的程序。

公司应具备记录、调查、评价、评审和分析报告并采取适当行动的体系。 6.2 体系应确保由负责人员评审和评价报告，以确定适当的纠正措施并确保不再复发。

评价报告可导致： .1 适当的纠正措施； .2 现有程序和须知的修正案；和 .3 制定新的程序和须知。

6.3 负责人员应适当监控不合格/缺陷报告的跟踪和结束。收到报告后应告知发送报告

的人员。这应包括报告的状态和任何决定。 6.4 公司应鼓励报告侥幸脱险的险情，以保持和提高安全意识（参见海安会

MSC/Circ.1015 通函）。侥幸脱险的险情可定义为事故得到避免的危险情况。此事件的报告

和分析对公司进行有效的风险评估是十分重要的，特别是当无法获得事故信息时。 7 内审 7.1 公司应至少一年实行一次内审以验证岸基和船上活动是否符合 SMS。应按公司制

定的程序准备和实行内部验证。程序应至少考虑以下要素： .1 责任； .2 审核员的能力和选择； .3 审核期限； .4 准备和策划审核； .5 实行审核； .6 审核报告；和 .7 纠正措施跟踪。

8 资格、培训和经历 8.1 ISM 规则要求公司确保与 SMS 有关的所有人员能充分理解有关规范、条例、规则

及指南。公司应确保所有人员具备支持 SMS 所需的资格、培训和经历。

1/2

MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.6 通函（2007 年 10 月 19 日）

根据国际安全管理（ISM）规则规定承担指定人员的职责所需的资格、培训和经历导则

1 海上环境保护委员会在其第 56 届会议（2007 年 7 月 9 日至 13 日）和海上安全委员会在

其第 83 届会议（2007 年 10 月 3 日至 12 日）上注意到海上安全委员会在其第 74 届会议（2001年 5 月 30 日至 6 月 8 日）上同意指定人员对航运公司的安全管理体系的制定和实施承担关

键职责，以确保海上安全、防止人员受伤或丧失生命、避免对环境（尤其是海洋环境）及对

财产的损害。 2 本委员会还同意亟需为航运公司根据国际安全管理（ISM）规则规定承担指定人员的职

责所需的资格、培训和经历提供指导。 3 为此，本委员会制定了根据国际安全管理（ISM）规则规定承担指定人员的职责所需的

资格、培训和经历导则，其文本载于附件。 4 建议各成员国政府和相关国际组织提请所有各方注意本通函。

2/2

附件

根据国际安全管理（ISM）规则规定承担指定人员的职责所需的资格、培训和经历导则

1 引言本指南适用于按国际安全管理（ISM）规则的规定承担指定人员职责的人员。 2 资格 2.1 指定人员应至少接受下列正式教育：

.1 主管机关或认可组织认可的高等学校给予的管理、工程或自然科学相关领域的

资格认证，或 .2 按经修正的《1978 年海员培训、发证和值班标准国际公约》认证的高级船员的

资格和航海经历，或 .3 其他正式教育，连同船舶管理营运的不少于三年的实际高级职位经历。

3 培训 3.1 指定人员应按 ISM 规则的要求接受有关安全管理要素的培训，特别是：

.1 ISM 规则的了解和理解；

.2 强制性规范和规则；

.3 适用的规则、指南和标准；

.4 检查、提问、评价和报告的评估技巧；

.5 安全管理的技术或操作方面；

.6 航运和船上操作的适当知识；

.7 参与至少一次航海管理体系审核；和

.8 与船上人员和高级管理层的有效沟通。 4 经历 4.1 指定人员应具备如下经历：

.1 将 ISM 事项呈送最高管理层，并为改善安全管理体系获得持续支持；

.2 确定安全管理体系的要素是否满足 ISM 规则的要求；

.3 使用制定的内审和管理评审原则确定公司内部和船舶的安全管理体系的有效

性，以确保符合规范和规则； .4 评估安全管理体系的有效性，以确保符合法定和入级检验未涉及的其他规范和

规则，并能对这些规范和规则的符合性进行验证； .5 评估本组织、主管机关、船级社、其他国际机构和海事界组织为促进安全文化

而建议的安全操作是否已予以考虑；和 .6 搜集和分析险情、危险情况、侥幸脱险、事件和事故的数据，并将吸取的教训

应用于改善公司内部及其船舶的安全管理体系。 5 公司要求和记录 5.1 公司应提供包括资格、培训和经历的培训课程，以及与符合 ISM 规则相关的适当

程序（包括实际培训和连续更新）。公司应提供指定人员具备按 ISM 规则规定承担职责的相

关资格、培训和经历的文件证据。

1/7

海安会 MSC.1/Circ.1235 通函（2007 年 10 月 21 日）

船上人员保安培训和熟悉指南

1 海上安全委员会（本委员会）在其第 83 届会议（2007 年 10 月 3 日至 12 日）上注意到

STW 分委会在其第 38 次会议（2007 年 1 月 22 日至 26 日）上编制的 STCW 公约和 STCW规则的修正案草案，目的是将有关船上有或无指定保安职责人员的保安培训和熟悉培训的规

定纳入其中。本委员会同时审议了 STW 分委会的建议案，即将修正案草案的相关要素作为

ISPS 规则有关规定的导则予以分发，以增强海上保安和促进 SOLAS 第 XI-2 章和 ISPS 规则

的一致和协调实施。

2 本委员会忆及当前计划是在未来日期通过上述修正案，成为 STW 分委会当前承担的

STCW 公约和 STCW 规则全面评审的一部分。因此建议向 SOLAS 缔约国政府和 STCW 缔

约国提供与船上人员培训和熟悉相关议题预期发展方向的信息，使其能调整国家要求、计划

和作法，因而确保一致性。本委员会同意，此方法也将确保对新要求的顺利引入和过渡。

3 本委员会还同意，如果各国政府力求使其要求与草案中所述的保持一致，应合理地预期

到在所述修正案生效前，船上人员在识别和接受所获得的培训和经验方面会遇到较少困难。

4 因此，本委员会批准了船上人员保安培训和熟悉培训导则（本导则），其文本载于附件。

5 本委员会同意： .1 本导则的唯一目的是协助SOLAS缔约国政府实施 ISPS规则A/13.3和B/13.3、B/13.4

的规定； .2 本导则没有制定按 SOLAS 第 XI-2/9 条行使控制和符合措施、或按 STCW 第 X 条

或STCW第 I/4条行使控制的相关方可请求或要求出示证明船上人员满足本导则所

述要求的文件证据的依据；和 .3 本导则没有制定 SOLAS 缔约国政府要求服务于进入其领土内港口的船舶的船上人

员满足本导则所述要求的依据。

6 本委员会同时重申了在其第 77 届会议（2003 年 5 月 28 日至 6 月 6 日）上对培训和发证

的建议，即作为暂行措施，《国际船舶保安证书》应被接受作为表明培训已按 ISPS 规则实施

的初步证据。船旗国负责决定培训实施的方式，以及是否需要另外发证。如果港口国控制检

查发现培训不足，可采取进一步措施。

7 请 SOLAS 缔约国政府提请所有各方注意本指南中所涉及的事项。

8 实施本导则遇到困难的 SOLAS 缔约国政府、国际组织和具有咨询地位的非政府组织应

尽早使本委员会注意相关事项，以进行审议并决定采取的措施。

2/7

附件

船上人员保安培训和熟悉指南

1 适用范围 1.1 本导则适用于受雇于或工作在要求符合 SOLAS 第 XI-2 章和 ISPS 规则的船舶的船

上人员（船舶保安员除外）。 1.2 术语“船上人员”系指：（1）船长和船员或作为该船舶业务方面的任何能受雇或

从事船上工作的其他人员，包括高速船；（2）如果是特殊用途船舶①，船员②和特殊人员③；

（3）如果是非就位状态的海上移动钻井平台，特殊人员④和海上船员⑤；不包括乘客。 2 一般原则 2.1 船上人员不是保安专家，因此本导则规定的目的不是将他们转变为保安专家。 2.2 船上人员应接受适当的保安培训或指导和熟悉培训以获得所需的知识和理解来履

行其分配的职责，并共同促进海上保安的增强。 2.3 船上人员在其职业生涯中应至少接受一次适当的保安培训或指导。 2.4 船舶保安员或具有相同资质的人员应实施保安熟悉培训。 3 术语 3.1 ISPS 规则的 A/9.4.7 规定船舶保安计划应涉及“船上负有保安责任的人员的职责和

船上其他人员在保安方面的职责”。ISPS 规则的 A/13.3 和 B/13.3 提及“船上承担具体保安

职责和责任的人员”，ISPS 规则的 B/13.4 提及了相对于 ISPS 规则 B/13.3 的“船上所有其他

人员”。 3.2 因此本导则使用“有指定保安职责”的船上人员来表示负有船舶保安计划规定的

具体保安职责和责任的人员。使用“无指定保安职责”的船上人员来表示船上所有其他人员。 4 无指定保安职责的船上人员 4.1 保安意识的基础培训或指导

① 特殊用途船舶的定义见A.534（13）决议通过、经海安会MSC/Circ.446、478和 739通函以及海安会MSC.183

（79）决议修正的《特殊用途船舶安全规则》（SPS 规则）的 1.3.4。 ② 船员的定义见 SPS 规则的 1.3.1。 ③ 特殊人员的定义见 SPS 规则的 1.3.3。 ④ 特殊人员的定义见 A.891（21）决议通过的《海上移动钻井平台（MoUs）人员培训建议案》（MoUs 培训

建议案）的 2.1.12。 ⑤ 海上船员的定义见 MoUs 培训建议案的 2.1.13。

3/7

4.1.1 无指定保安职责的船上人员应能证明具备履行表 1 第 1 栏所述的任务、职责和责

任的能力。 4.1.2 表 1 第 2 栏所述的知识水平应足以能使船上人员共同致力于加强海上保安。 4.1.3 成功完成基于表 1 规定的知识、理解和精通（KUP）的认可保安意识培训的人员

应视为已满足要求。完成此类培训的人员应具备使相关 SOLAS 缔约国政府满意的文件证据。 4.2 保安熟悉培训 4.2.1 在分配船上职责前，无指定保安职责的船上人员应接受保安熟悉培训从而能够：

.1 报告保安事件；

.2 了解在识别出保安威胁时应遵循的程序；和

.3 参与保安应急和紧急程序。 4.3 对照 ISPS 规则的要求 4.3.1 符合 4.1 和 4.2 的无指定保安职责的船上人员应视为满足 ISPS 规则 B/13.4 的要

求。 5 有指定保安职责的船上人员 5.1 指定保安职责的培训或指导 5.1.1 有指定保安职责的船上人员应能证明具备履行表 2 第 1 栏所述的任务、职责和责

任的能力。 5.1.2 表 2 第 2 栏所述的知识水平应充足以使船上人员履行其指定的保安职责。 5.1.3 成功完成基于表 2 规定的知识、理解和精通（KUP）的认可保安意识培训的人员

应视为已满足要求。完成培训的人员应具备使相关 SOLAS 缔约国政府满意的文件证据。 5.2 保安熟悉培训 5.2.1 有指定保安职责的船上人员在分配职责前，应接受其分配职责和责任的保安熟悉

培训并考虑船舶保安计划的规定。 5.3 对照 ISPS 规则的要求 5.3.1 符合 5.1 和 5.2 的有指定保安职责的船上人员应视为满足 ISPS 规则 A/13.3 和

B/13.3 的要求。 6 证明能力的替代方法

4/7

SOLAS 缔约国政府可允许船上人员通过以下方法证明具备履行表 1 或表 2 第 1 栏所述

的任务、职责和责任的能力： .1 在过去三年内至少有总共六个月的时间作为有或无指定保安职责的船上人员的

认可的航海服务，条件是从 2004 年 7 月 1 日以后已累计六个月；或 .2 2004 年 7 月 1 日以后履行的保安职能视为与 6.1 要求的航海服务等效；或 .3 通过认可的测试；或 .4 成功完成认可的培训。

5/7

表 1 保安意识相关的知识、理解和精通（KUP）

第 1 栏第 2 栏第 3 栏第 4 栏

能力知识、理解和精通证明能力的方法评价能力的衡准

通过提高意识促进海上

保安的增强

海上保安术语和定义的

基本工作知识

政府、公司和人员的国际

海上保安政策和责任的

基本知识

海上保安等级及其对船

上和港口设施的保安措

施和程序影响的基本知

识

保安报告程序的基本知

识

保安应急计划的基本知

识

从认可指导或参加认可

课程获得证据的评估

正确标识有关增强海上

保安的要求

保安威胁的识别用于回避保安措施的技

巧的基本知识

具备识别潜在保安威胁

的基本知识

具备识别武器、危险物质

和装备的基本知识，以及

所产生危害的意识

处理保安信息和保安通

信的基本知识



正确标识海上保安威胁

理解保持保安意识和警

觉的必要性和方法

相关公约和规则的培训、

演习和训练要求的基本

知识



正确标识有关增强海上

保安的要求

6/7

表 2 有指定保安职责的船上人员相关的知识、理解和精通（KUP）



维持船舶保安计划规定

的条件

海上保安术语和定义的

工作知识

政府、公司和人员的国际

海上保安政策和责任的

知识

了解海上保安等级及其

对船上和港口设施的保

安措施和程序的影响

了解保安报告程序

了解演习和训练程序

了解实施检查和检验的

程序，以及控制和监控船

舶保安计划中规定的保

安事件

了解保安应急计划，以及

对保安状况受到威胁或

破坏作出反应的程序，包

括维持船/港界面的关键

操作的规定



程序和措施符合 ISPS 规

则和 SOLAS 公约的原则

正确标识有关保安的立

法要求

责任范围内的通信清晰

且被理解

保安危险和威胁的识别了解保安文件，包括保安

声明

了解用于回避保安措施

的技巧

具备识别潜在保安威胁

的知识

具备识别武器、危险物质

和装备的知识，以及所产

生危害的意识

了解对人群的管理和控

制技巧（如适用）





7/7



具备处理保安信息和保

安通信的知识

了解实地搜查和非侵犯

检查的方法

定期对船舶进行保安检

查

了解监视限制区域的技

巧

具备控制进入船舶的通

道和船上限制区域的知

识

了解有效监视甲板区域

和船舶周围区域的方法

了解货物和船舶物料的

检查方法

了解控制人员以及物品

上下船和船上通道的方

法





保安设备和系统（如有）

的正确使用

大体了解各种类型的保

安设备和系统，包括其限

制

了解测试、校准和维护保

安系统和设备的必要性，

尤其是在海上



设备和系统的运行符合

制定的设备运行须知，并

考虑设备和系统的限制



Form: RWPRR401-B C C S 通函

Documents

Transcript of Form: RWPRR401-B C C S 通函

Form: RWPRR401-B C C S 通 函

Documents

Transcript of Form: RWPRR401-B C C S 通 函

Form: RWPRR401-B C C S 通函

Transcript of Form: RWPRR401-B C C S 通函