EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

23
Het Nieuwe Werken Netwerkbijeenkomst EKSBIT 23.09.2009 Marc van Veldhoven Associate Professor HR Studies

description

Met de netwerkbijeenkomst Nieuwe Werkers... of het Nieuwe Werken? gaan we verkennen wat de impact van digitalisering en informatietechnologie is op de werkende mens en op het werk als zodanig. Gaan werkende mensen zich steeds meer gedragen als nomadische en onafhankelijke zelfstandigen of blijft offline sociale interactie tussen werkende mensen van groot belang? En wat voor gevolgen hebben nieuwe werkers en het nieuwe werken op traditionele interactiepatronen tussen klanten en leveranciers, tussen werkgevers en werknemers en bestuurders en aandeelhouders? En wat levert het op voor het individu, de organisatie en de maatschappij? Ook stellen we de vraag, hoe we ontwikkelingen in het werken kunnen koppelen aan technologische ontwikkelingen. En andersom. Het perspectief van Microsoft maakt onderdeel uit van het programma, met een rondleiding door De Praktijk, een op Schiphol gelegen technologisch vooruitstrevend kantoor. Aansluitend deelt een gerenommeerd scenario-expert uit de Microsoft praktijk zijn visie op werk en technologie in de toekomst. Een hoogleraar van de Universiteit van Tilburg zet daar een wetenschappelijk perspectief naast. Aan de hand van een aantal stellingen tenslotte, zullen we discussiëren over technologie als 'enabler' van Nieuwe Werkers... of het Nieuwe Werken. We blijven in de kern dus trouw aan de missie van de informatiekundige.

Transcript of EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Page 1: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Het Nieuwe Werken

Netwerkbijeenkomst EKSBIT 23.09.2009

Marc van Veldhoven Associate Professor HR Studies

Page 2: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Content

Intro Telework

Flexible Office HR Implications

Page 3: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Framework

Technology

Culture/ Society

Work & Organization

Economy

Effects

Page 4: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Work force Netherlands NL 1899-1997 (based on CBS/Steijn, 2001)

Page 5: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Core implications

•  Working with computers EU-27/2005: 46% (>quarter of working time)

•  Working with people/direct client contact EU-27/2005: 63% (>quarter of working time)

•  Source: –  4th European working conditions survey (2005) ->

(N=1.000 employees interviewed per country)

Page 6: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Study on the “Virtualization of organizations” TNO Quality of Life 2004 (De Leede & van Dalen)

•  4 types of virtualization have been researched

•  Telephone survey among 525 employers NL

•  Frequency:   mobile work: 69%   virtual teams: 32%   shared services: 2%   virtual networks: 35%

Page 7: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

What is telework? ‘Types of work from a distance mediated by ICT, facilitated by the

employer’: -mobile work -working from a satellite office -tele-homework

*Frequency (per week, per year?), *Facilitated by the organization: financially, workplace, scheduling?

>no universal definition or phenomenon!

Page 8: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

NEA 2008 (TNO Quality of Life) •  Random sample NL workforce (N>20.000)

–  Average contractual hours worked at home (excl. overtime): 1,57 hours/week (only 5% of all NL working hours)

–  Are you a teleworker? 12,2% of the workforce

Page 9: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

4th European working conditions survey (2005) (N=1.000 employee interviews per country)

Page 10: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Why does telework not reach a larger part of the workforce?

•  Employees would like to…

•  Employers and managers often have a rather passive attitude towards the implementation of telework: resistance! Why?

•  For some jobs presence on site is absolutely necessary (e.g. hospitals, construction, manufacturing)

•  Telework is considered by employers and managers rather as an employee benefit for higher educated, valuable professionals than as a total solution for all employees (as politicians argue)

Page 11: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Bailey & Kurland (2002)

•  A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work

Central questions: -who participates in telework? -why do individuals telework? -what happens when people telework?

Overview of 20 years or research on telework (>130 studies) -> Does the “teleworker” exist?

Page 12: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Why do individuals telework?

Demand for telework: which factors determine the wish of employees to use telework?

-shorter commuting; less traffic jams; less costs commuting -better possibilities to combine work and care for children ?gender ?family composition +familiarity with ICT -age

Supply of telework: which factors determine the wish of employers to use telework?

-willingness to change -need to control employees (monitoring) vs trust -costs ?size of the organization

Page 13: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

What happens when people telework?

+ productivity (as indicated in self-reports, more hours of work)

? Job satisfaction

- loyalty

Page 14: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

The overlooked question •  > how do people telework?

“most teleworkers work at home or in telework centres only a few days per month”

> If this is the case: at the individual level hardly any differences in comparison with regular full-time work at the office can be expected

> Isolation can hardly be a problem > Telework appears to be a temporary escape from the office (in

order to meet important deadlines/targets) rather than a structural working arrangement; maybe we have to reconsider what telework actually is…

Page 15: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

New issue in telework research

•  frustration in employees who stay behind in the office… (Golden, 2007)

Page 16: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Telework: management resistance

•  Further dispersion of telework meets resistance from managers

•  Why? -> –  Most direct answer can be found in a paper by Charles

Handy (1995) in the Harvard Business Review: “How do you manage people whom you don’t see?”

–  Telework requires a starting point of trust in employees on behalf of management

Page 17: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

The Flexible Office •  ICT offers new possibilities for office design, by creating flexible,

shared office spaces in combination with telework/mobile work

•  Goals of flexible office projects: -  Break with “closed door/closed department” culture -  Combine separate locations in one new location -  Increase efficiency in administrative processes -  Save money: need less office space and less technical

facilities, reduce service costs

Page 18: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Study Interpolis •  In 1996 Interpolis introduced a flexible office concept

•  Longitudinal study: 3 surveys among 90 employees of 2 business units over a 2-year period (De Jonge & Rutte, 1999):

  - more autonomy, cooperation & possibilities for contact   - no changes in communication, concentration & participation

•  25% reduction in exploitation costs for the office •  No panacea: some problems of adjustment in some of the

employees; not everyone fits well within such an office model; some difficulty in employees to keep concentrated.

Page 19: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

What impact do new office concepts have on employees?

Literature review study by de Croon et al. (2005)

•  Literature-review: found 49 relevant studies

•  3 independent variables: –  Office location (home vs office) –  Office lay-out (openness, distance between work stations) –  Office use (fixed vs shared workplaces)

•  3 dependent variables: –  Working conditions, short term reactions (job satisfaction, job

stress etc), long term reactions (health, performance etc).

Page 20: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Results •  Office location (home vs office)

–  Insufficient evidence

•  Office lay-out (openness, distance between work stations) –  Open-ness leads to less privacy (strong evidence) –  Open-ness leads to higher cognitive workload and worse

interpersonal relationships (limited evidence) –  Close distance between work stations leads to higher cognitive

workload and lower privacy (limited evidence) –  Close distance between work stations leads to lower job

satisfaction (strong evidence)

•  Office use (fixed vs shared workplaces) –  Desk sharing leads to better communication (limited evidence)

Page 21: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Telework/New office concepts: implications for HRM?

Page 22: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

•  HRM will be asked to offer a strategic contribution in the discussion on the pros and cons:

  Try to counterbalance technological or financial points of view with input about the human element

•  HRM might play a role in the implementation:   Keep in mind the balance between business logic and the logic

of human needs   Employees as well as employers might show problems of

adjustment: these hang-ups deserve (temporary) appropriate attention

  How do you develop trust in employees among managers?

Page 23: EKSBIT Marc Van Veldhoven (Universiteit Van Tilburg) 23 September 2009

Good commisionership

•  Relatively new niche in ICT-market: –  selecting, testing, implementing & controlling ICT-solutions

with strong emphasis on user acceptance and adoption

–  Valori, kennisleider in Goed Opdrachtgeverschap