DOE Shilpagupta 111906
Transcript of DOE Shilpagupta 111906
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
1/26
1
Statistical Design of
ExperimentsBITS Pilani, November 19 2006
~ Shilpa Gupta (97A4)
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
2/26
2
Quiz Design of Experiments
Did you attend the lecture on Design of Experiment part I ?
_______
Control chart help in distinguishing two types of ________
over time - ____________ and ___________ Difference between Control Charts and Design of
Experiments?
Three types of experimentation strategies are
____________, ______________, ______________
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
3/26
3
Outline
Motivation for conducting Experiments Types of Experiments Applications of Experimental Designs Guidelines for Experimental Design
Choice of Factor and levels
Basic Principles Randomization
Replication Blocking
Factorial Design
Fractional Factorial Design Other Designs Research Topics References
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
4/26
4
Objective is to optimize y,
Increase yield Decrease the number of defects
Reduced variability and closer conformance to
nominal
Reduced development time
Reduced overall costs Interested in determining:
x variables which are most influential on response y.
where to set influential xs so that y is near nominal
requirement.
where to set influential xs so that variability in y is
small.
where to set influential xs so that effects of
uncontrollable variables z are minimized.
Why study a process..?
Model of a System or a Process
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
5/26
6
Design of Experiment
Series of changes made to input variables to observechanges in the output response
Three approaches
Best Guess approach - No guarantee of success.
One factor at a time (OFAT) - Fails to consider interaction
effects
Statistical Design of Experiments planning to gather data
that can be analyzed using statistical methods resulting in valid
and objective conclusions
Sophisticated QC tool and hence leads to significant gains in the
process as compared to the other tools
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
6/26
7
Guidelines for Experimental Design*
* Coleman, D. E, and Montgomery, D. C. (1993), A Systematic Approach to Planning for a DesignedIndustrial Experiment, Technometrics, 35, pp 1-27
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
7/26
8
Choice of Factor and Levels
Design FactorsHeld-constant
Allowed-to-vary
Nuisance FactorsControllable e.g.
Blocking
Uncontrollable e.g.
analysis of covariance
Noise e.g.
Robust design
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
8/26
9
Principles
Blocking
Randomization
Replication
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
9/26
10
Example#4
A product development engineer is interested ininvestigating the tensile strength of a new syntheticfiber that will be used to make cloth for mens shirt.
The engineer knows from past experience that the
strength of the fiber is affected by the weightpercentage of cotton content in the blend ofmaterials for the fiber. The engineer suspectsincreasing the cotton content will increase thestrength. The cotton content ranges from 10-40%. So
the engineer decides to test at 5 treatmentlevels:15, 20, 25, 30, 35
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
10/26
11
Basic Principles Replication, Randomization and Blocking
Replication
Repetition of basic experiment and NOT repeatedmeasurements
Obtain an estimate of error
More precise estimate of the error (incase of mean)
Example: Take 5 replicates,
pick the runs randomly
Single replicate experiments Combine higher order interactions to obtainan estimate of error
Cotton
Weight
Percenta
ge
Experimental Run Number
Rep
1
Rep2 Rep
3
Rep 4 Rep 5
15
20
25
30
35
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
11/26
12
Randomization Averaging out the effect of nuisance parameters
Suppose the 25 runs were not randomized, i.e. all 5 runs at15% were tested first followed by 5 runs at 20% and so on. If
the tensile strength testing machine exhibits warm-up effectwhich means the longer it is on, the lower tensile strengthreadings will be. This warmup effect will contaminate thetensile strength data and destroy the validity of theexperiment.
Restriction on randomization call for specialized
designs Randomized complete block design and Latin Squares
Split Plot Design Hard to change factors
Nested or Hierarchical Design
Basic Principles Replication, Randomization and Blocking
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
12/26
13
Example - Demonstrate ANOVA
Tensile Strength experiment
Cotton
Weight
Percen
tage
Observation
Total Average Rep 1 Rep2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 5
15 49 9.8 7 7 15 11 9
20 77 15.4 12 17 12 18 18
25 88 17.6 14 18 18 19 19
30 108 21.6 19 25 22 19 23
35 54 10.8 7 10 11 15 11
376 15.04
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
13/26
14
Box Plot
Tensile
Strength
3530252015
25
20
15
10
5
Boxplot of 15, 20, 25, 30, 35
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
14/26
15
Analysis Steps Effects Model
Hypothesis
Test Statistic obtained by partitioning the total sum of squares
Critical region
1,2,...,,
1,2,...,ij i ij
i ay
j nm t e
== + +
=
0 1 2: 0
: atleast one is 0
a
a
H
H
t t t= = = =
L
( ) ( ) ( )22 2
.. . .. .
1 1 1 1 1
T Treatments Error
a n a a n
i i ij i
i j i i j
SS SS SS
y y n y y y y= = = = =
= +
- = - + -
2
2
~
~
Treatments
Error
TreatmentsTreatments DoF
Treatments
ErrorDoF
Error
SSMS
DOF
SSMSE
DOF
c
c
=
=
1 , ,T reat ment s E rro r
Treatments
DOF DOF
Error
MSTest Statistic F
MSa-
= =
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
15/26
16
Checking assumptions
Assumptions Independence
Constant Variance
Errors are distributed Normal with mean zero
Linear relationship
Residual Plots
Normal Probability Plot
Residuals versus Fitted
Residuals vs. Time order
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
16/26
17
Basic Principles Randomization, Replication and Blocking
Blocking Creating homogeneous conditions for subset of
experiments
Improve the precision by eliminating the variabilitydue to nuisance factor (factors that are influential butnot of interest and can be observed but notcontrolled)
Sum of Squares of Block account for the variability
due to blocks Example:
Suppose each replication was done on a separate dayand atmospheric temperature is nuisance factor. Useblocking.
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
17/26
18
Experimental Designs
Features of a desirable design Reasonable distribution of data points
Allows lack of fit to be estimated
Allows experiments to be performed in blocks
Allows designs of higher order to be built up sequentially
Provides an internal estimate of error Provides precise estimates of the model coefficients
Provides good profile of the prediction variance
Provides robustness against outliers
Does not require large runs
Does not require too many levels of the independent factors Ensure simplicity of calculation of the model parameters
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
18/26
19
Design Space
x1
x2
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
19/26
20
Factorial Design
All factors are varied together Full factorials all combinations of the factors
are tested in each replicate
If we have 4 factors at 2 levels => we have 24
= 16experimental runs
Fractional Factorials fewer combinations of the
factors are examined Half fraction of 24 = 24-1 = 8 experimental runs
Sparsity of Effects principle -> higher order
interactions are not significant
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
20/26
21
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
21/26
22
Generator ABC
Defining relationship, I = ABC Alias, e.g. [A] = A + BC, [B] = B + AC
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
22/26
23
Design Resolution
Resolution III design - Main effects arealiased with two - factor interactions (FI)
Resolution IV design 2 FI are aliased
with 2 FI
Resolution V Design 2 FI are aliased
with 3 FI
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
23/26
24
Analysis Procedure for Factorial Designs
Estimate Factor Effects
Form Preliminary Model
Test for significance of factor effects Analyze residuals
Refine Model, if necessary
Interpret results
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
24/26
29
Research Opportunities in Design ofExperiments*
Design for computer experiments
Response surface designs for cases involving
randomization restriction
Model robust designs
Designs for non - normal response
Design, analysis and optimization of multiple responses
Second order designs involving categorical factors
* Myers, R. H. , Montgomery, D. C., Vining, G. G, Borror, C. and Kowalski, S. M. 2004. Response
Surface Methodology: A Retrospective and Literature Survey, Journal of Quality Technology, 36, pp53 - 77
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
25/26
30
Reference
Basic Concepts and Examples Mitra, A. Fundamentals of Quality Control and Improvement, 2nd
Edition, Prentice Hall.
Montgomery, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th
Edition, Wiley, New York.
Advanced Experimental Designs
Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C. Response Surface Methodology
2nd Edition, Wiley, New York
-
8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906
26/26
31
QUESTIONS