DOE Shilpagupta 111906

download DOE Shilpagupta 111906

of 26

Transcript of DOE Shilpagupta 111906

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    1/26

    1

    Statistical Design of

    ExperimentsBITS Pilani, November 19 2006

    ~ Shilpa Gupta (97A4)

    [email protected]

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    2/26

    2

    Quiz Design of Experiments

    Did you attend the lecture on Design of Experiment part I ?

    _______

    Control chart help in distinguishing two types of ________

    over time - ____________ and ___________ Difference between Control Charts and Design of

    Experiments?

    Three types of experimentation strategies are

    ____________, ______________, ______________

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    3/26

    3

    Outline

    Motivation for conducting Experiments Types of Experiments Applications of Experimental Designs Guidelines for Experimental Design

    Choice of Factor and levels

    Basic Principles Randomization

    Replication Blocking

    Factorial Design

    Fractional Factorial Design Other Designs Research Topics References

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    4/26

    4

    Objective is to optimize y,

    Increase yield Decrease the number of defects

    Reduced variability and closer conformance to

    nominal

    Reduced development time

    Reduced overall costs Interested in determining:

    x variables which are most influential on response y.

    where to set influential xs so that y is near nominal

    requirement.

    where to set influential xs so that variability in y is

    small.

    where to set influential xs so that effects of

    uncontrollable variables z are minimized.

    Why study a process..?

    Model of a System or a Process

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    5/26

    6

    Design of Experiment

    Series of changes made to input variables to observechanges in the output response

    Three approaches

    Best Guess approach - No guarantee of success.

    One factor at a time (OFAT) - Fails to consider interaction

    effects

    Statistical Design of Experiments planning to gather data

    that can be analyzed using statistical methods resulting in valid

    and objective conclusions

    Sophisticated QC tool and hence leads to significant gains in the

    process as compared to the other tools

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    6/26

    7

    Guidelines for Experimental Design*

    * Coleman, D. E, and Montgomery, D. C. (1993), A Systematic Approach to Planning for a DesignedIndustrial Experiment, Technometrics, 35, pp 1-27

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    7/26

    8

    Choice of Factor and Levels

    Design FactorsHeld-constant

    Allowed-to-vary

    Nuisance FactorsControllable e.g.

    Blocking

    Uncontrollable e.g.

    analysis of covariance

    Noise e.g.

    Robust design

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    8/26

    9

    Principles

    Blocking

    Randomization

    Replication

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    9/26

    10

    Example#4

    A product development engineer is interested ininvestigating the tensile strength of a new syntheticfiber that will be used to make cloth for mens shirt.

    The engineer knows from past experience that the

    strength of the fiber is affected by the weightpercentage of cotton content in the blend ofmaterials for the fiber. The engineer suspectsincreasing the cotton content will increase thestrength. The cotton content ranges from 10-40%. So

    the engineer decides to test at 5 treatmentlevels:15, 20, 25, 30, 35

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    10/26

    11

    Basic Principles Replication, Randomization and Blocking

    Replication

    Repetition of basic experiment and NOT repeatedmeasurements

    Obtain an estimate of error

    More precise estimate of the error (incase of mean)

    Example: Take 5 replicates,

    pick the runs randomly

    Single replicate experiments Combine higher order interactions to obtainan estimate of error

    Cotton

    Weight

    Percenta

    ge

    Experimental Run Number

    Rep

    1

    Rep2 Rep

    3

    Rep 4 Rep 5

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    11/26

    12

    Randomization Averaging out the effect of nuisance parameters

    Suppose the 25 runs were not randomized, i.e. all 5 runs at15% were tested first followed by 5 runs at 20% and so on. If

    the tensile strength testing machine exhibits warm-up effectwhich means the longer it is on, the lower tensile strengthreadings will be. This warmup effect will contaminate thetensile strength data and destroy the validity of theexperiment.

    Restriction on randomization call for specialized

    designs Randomized complete block design and Latin Squares

    Split Plot Design Hard to change factors

    Nested or Hierarchical Design

    Basic Principles Replication, Randomization and Blocking

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    12/26

    13

    Example - Demonstrate ANOVA

    Tensile Strength experiment

    Cotton

    Weight

    Percen

    tage

    Observation

    Total Average Rep 1 Rep2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 5

    15 49 9.8 7 7 15 11 9

    20 77 15.4 12 17 12 18 18

    25 88 17.6 14 18 18 19 19

    30 108 21.6 19 25 22 19 23

    35 54 10.8 7 10 11 15 11

    376 15.04

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    13/26

    14

    Box Plot

    Tensile

    Strength

    3530252015

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    Boxplot of 15, 20, 25, 30, 35

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    14/26

    15

    Analysis Steps Effects Model

    Hypothesis

    Test Statistic obtained by partitioning the total sum of squares

    Critical region

    1,2,...,,

    1,2,...,ij i ij

    i ay

    j nm t e

    == + +

    =

    0 1 2: 0

    : atleast one is 0

    a

    a

    H

    H

    t t t= = = =

    L

    ( ) ( ) ( )22 2

    .. . .. .

    1 1 1 1 1

    T Treatments Error

    a n a a n

    i i ij i

    i j i i j

    SS SS SS

    y y n y y y y= = = = =

    = +

    - = - + -

    2

    2

    ~

    ~

    Treatments

    Error

    TreatmentsTreatments DoF

    Treatments

    ErrorDoF

    Error

    SSMS

    DOF

    SSMSE

    DOF

    c

    c

    =

    =

    1 , ,T reat ment s E rro r

    Treatments

    DOF DOF

    Error

    MSTest Statistic F

    MSa-

    = =

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    15/26

    16

    Checking assumptions

    Assumptions Independence

    Constant Variance

    Errors are distributed Normal with mean zero

    Linear relationship

    Residual Plots

    Normal Probability Plot

    Residuals versus Fitted

    Residuals vs. Time order

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    16/26

    17

    Basic Principles Randomization, Replication and Blocking

    Blocking Creating homogeneous conditions for subset of

    experiments

    Improve the precision by eliminating the variabilitydue to nuisance factor (factors that are influential butnot of interest and can be observed but notcontrolled)

    Sum of Squares of Block account for the variability

    due to blocks Example:

    Suppose each replication was done on a separate dayand atmospheric temperature is nuisance factor. Useblocking.

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    17/26

    18

    Experimental Designs

    Features of a desirable design Reasonable distribution of data points

    Allows lack of fit to be estimated

    Allows experiments to be performed in blocks

    Allows designs of higher order to be built up sequentially

    Provides an internal estimate of error Provides precise estimates of the model coefficients

    Provides good profile of the prediction variance

    Provides robustness against outliers

    Does not require large runs

    Does not require too many levels of the independent factors Ensure simplicity of calculation of the model parameters

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    18/26

    19

    Design Space

    x1

    x2

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    19/26

    20

    Factorial Design

    All factors are varied together Full factorials all combinations of the factors

    are tested in each replicate

    If we have 4 factors at 2 levels => we have 24

    = 16experimental runs

    Fractional Factorials fewer combinations of the

    factors are examined Half fraction of 24 = 24-1 = 8 experimental runs

    Sparsity of Effects principle -> higher order

    interactions are not significant

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    20/26

    21

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    21/26

    22

    Generator ABC

    Defining relationship, I = ABC Alias, e.g. [A] = A + BC, [B] = B + AC

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    22/26

    23

    Design Resolution

    Resolution III design - Main effects arealiased with two - factor interactions (FI)

    Resolution IV design 2 FI are aliased

    with 2 FI

    Resolution V Design 2 FI are aliased

    with 3 FI

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    23/26

    24

    Analysis Procedure for Factorial Designs

    Estimate Factor Effects

    Form Preliminary Model

    Test for significance of factor effects Analyze residuals

    Refine Model, if necessary

    Interpret results

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    24/26

    29

    Research Opportunities in Design ofExperiments*

    Design for computer experiments

    Response surface designs for cases involving

    randomization restriction

    Model robust designs

    Designs for non - normal response

    Design, analysis and optimization of multiple responses

    Second order designs involving categorical factors

    * Myers, R. H. , Montgomery, D. C., Vining, G. G, Borror, C. and Kowalski, S. M. 2004. Response

    Surface Methodology: A Retrospective and Literature Survey, Journal of Quality Technology, 36, pp53 - 77

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    25/26

    30

    Reference

    Basic Concepts and Examples Mitra, A. Fundamentals of Quality Control and Improvement, 2nd

    Edition, Prentice Hall.

    Montgomery, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th

    Edition, Wiley, New York.

    Advanced Experimental Designs

    Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C. Response Surface Methodology

    2nd Edition, Wiley, New York

  • 8/2/2019 DOE Shilpagupta 111906

    26/26

    31

    QUESTIONS