AMAR Project 1

download AMAR Project 1

of 72

Transcript of AMAR Project 1

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    1/72

    1

    CHAPTER I

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 WORKING CAPITAL ANALYSIS

    1.1.1 MEANING AND CONCEPT OF WORKING CAPITAL

    Maintaining adequate working capital is not just important in the short-term.

    Sufficient liquidity must be maintained in order to ensure the survival of the business in

    the long term as well.

    Every business needs adequate liquid resources in order to maintain day-to-day

    cash flow. It needs enough cash to pay wages and salaries as they fall due and pay

    creditors if it is to keep its workforce and ensure its supplies.

    Therefore, when businesses make investment decisions they must not only

    consider the financial outlay involved with acquiring the new machine or the new

    building, etc, but must also take account of the additional current assets that are uaually

    involved with any expansion of activity.

    The term of 'working capital Analysis' includes both 'Analysis' and

    'Interpretation'. A distinction should, therefore, be made between the two terms. While

    the term 'Analysis' is used to mean the simplification of financial data by methodical

    classification of the data given in the working capital.' Interpretation' means, 'explaining

    the meaning and significance of the data so simplified.' However both Analysis and

    Interpretation are interlinked and complimentary to each other. Analysis is useless

    without interpretation and interpretation without analysis is difficult or even impossible.

    Even a profitable business may fail if it does not have adequate cash flow to meet

    its liabilities as they fall due.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    2/72

    2

    1.2 COMPANY PROFILE

    Chettinad Cement Corporation Limited (CCCL) was launched three decades ago

    by one of the Indias most illustrious sons Dr.Raja Sir. Muthiah Chettiar. The company

    continues to uphold and illustrates today under the dynamic leadership of

    Dr.M.A.M.Ramaswamy, Chairman and M.A.M.R.Muthiah, Managing Director.

    Chettinad Cement Corporation Limited was started in the year 1967. Initially the

    Cement was manufactured in the wet process technology. Due to hike in the fuel prices

    the company went for expansion in the year 1989 to produce cement with the latest dry

    process technology.

    CCCL has acquired most of its critical equipments, from Europe, USA and Japan

    and utilized foreign technological expertise to installed and commissioned these

    equipments.

    The vertical roller mill from Loesche for grinding Lignite, the first of its kind in the

    country is commissioned for processing the fuel requirement. The company with the

    installation of OK Mill, the worlds most sophisticated and Hi-Tech cement mill ( a

    vertical roller mill), the production capacity has quantum leaped and expected to touch a

    million mark. CCCL, apart from manufacturing cement, is also into wind energy farms.

    This includes harnessing power from 66 windmills setup at Poolavadi with various

    capacities. CCCL has taken elaborate measures for pollution control spending almost 10

    crores in this field. Many of the electrostatic precipitators and several filters and bag dust

    collector in cement mill are installed all over the plant. STP is also working to take care

    of water pollution. For Occupational Health & Safety, CCCL has institutionalized a

    Safety Committee working group, promoted the use of Personal Protective Equipment

    (PPE) in key work areas and subjecting the employees

    for regular health check-up.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    3/72

    3

    Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd., Puliyur Cement Factory has won

    international Recognition by getting IS/ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management System

    Certification And IS/ISO 14001:2004 Environmental Management System Certification.

    The company is having its captive mines for limestone about 40kms from factory

    (Seethainagar Limestone Mines). It is fully mechanised with latest sequential blasting

    technology. The limestone after blasting is handled and transported to crusher by means

    of heavy (earth moving equipments like shovel, dumpers, pay loaders. The limestone is

    unloaded to the impact crusher through hopper for crushing. This crusher helps in

    reducing the size of the limestone to the required size for further processing. The crushed

    limestone is transported by belt conveyors to bunker where the loading of the limestone

    takes place. The loading is done systematically by pneumatic gates provided below the

    bunkers to the wagons. The transportation of limestone is being done by our own wagons

    and locomotives. We have our own MG railway line with the intermediate station. The

    wagons containing limestone are unloaded by the wagon tippler in the factory and

    transported to the stockpile.

    The Stacker reclaimed is a linear stock pile which helps to blend the material by

    forming layers and while extracting material by reclaimed is right angle to the formation.

    This ensures blending of material. The stacker & reclaimer was supplied by Elecon and

    having a capacity of2 x 24,000 M.T. Stacking capacity. The limestone reclaimed from

    the stock pile Bauxite and Iron Ore as additives to compensate deficiencies of the

    limestone are filled in the hoppers. These materials are weighed and extracted to the

    vertical roller mill for grinding.

    The Vertical Roller Mill for raw material grinding is a highly energy efficient mill

    having the latest process controls. The material is ground to a fine powder and is

    collected in an Electrostatic Precipitator and transported to blending silos by means of

    bucket elevator. There are two silos for storing the ground raw material (Raw meal)

    which are also used for blending. The blended raw meal is extracted from the silo bottom

    and after weighment; it is transported to preprocessing section.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    4/72

    4

    The blended raw meal is transported by bucket elevators to the top of preheated

    where there are sets of five cyclones to transfer the heat or to preheat the raw meal by

    means of kiln and precalciner exhaust gases. The preheated raw meal is sent to

    precalciner where fuel is fired to calcine the material. The calcined raw meal is sent to

    kiln where further fuel is fired to convert the raw meal to clinker. The entire

    pyroprocessing is supplied by Fuller - USA.

    Coal / Lignite is used as fuel which again is ground to a fine power for handling and easy

    burning by means of vertical Roller Mill and stored in the coal bins. These are weighed

    and extracted at the bottom by screw conveyors, fired in the precalciner and kiln as

    mentioned above The clinker after formation is cooled in a CIS/CFG cooler and the

    cooled clinker is stored in the two silos.

    The clinker from the silos are extracted by conveyors and are transported to hoppers

    along with flyash and gypsum (Retarder) to convert into a final product.

    The weighed Quantity of clinker , Flyash, and gypsum are ground by vertical

    roller mill (OK mill) supplied by ONODO-KOBE Japan. This is one of the biggest mill

    in India with the latest sophistication. The ground cement is transported to the silos as per

    the type of cement by bucket elevators. The cement is extracted from the silo bottom and

    are packed in automatic packers. There are four automatic packers which helps to pack

    the cement in 50kg per bag and are transported to the destination by means of trucks and

    wagons. We have latest sophisticated

    1.2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SITE PLAN

    CCCL is located at Puliyur village in Karur (Dt.) Tamil Nadu,

    Trichy- Karur Highway 65km away from Trichy and 13 Km before Karur. It is situated at

    the elevation of approx 110 m Mean sea level. The Ambient temperature is 42 deg C max

    and 25 deg C Min with an average rainfall of 600-800mm in a year. The relative

    Humidity is 80-85% max and 50% min. The Maximum wind velocity is 50Km/Hr Max

    during the windy seasons.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    5/72

    5

    For 6 month wind direction is East- west and for the next 6 months west-

    east. Topographically the firm is generally flat. Amaravathi river which is tributory to

    river Cauvery, is situated about 2 Km away from the Factory. We have

    provided a school for our employees and for our near by society behind our colony. It is

    well connected by road in Tamil Nadu and Broad gauge Railway throughout India.

    The Chettinad Cement Corporation Limited (CCCL) is one of the most modern

    cement plant in the country located at Puliyur in Karur district, Tamil Nadu.

    1967 - 4 lac tonnes per annum cement production capacity with wet process

    1989 - Dry process kiln of 1700 TPD commissioned with vertical roller mill for

    fuel & limestone grinding.

    1990 - 2 Nos. of KVA Capacity WARTSILA DG set installed.

    1994-96 - 66 Nos. of wind electric Generator of total capacity 17.3 Mw installed

    at Poolavadi Udumaplet Taluk.

    1995 - ISO 9001 Certificate received.

    1996 - Stacker & Reclaimer for Limestone.

    1996-97 - Belt Elevator for Raw mill and Kiln feed installed.

    1997 - A) Impact Crusher for lime stone crushing at mines installed.

    B) Bag filter for coal mill grinding system.

    1998 - Vertical roller mill for cement grinding installed. Additional ESP installed

    for Klin / Raw mill to handle excess process gases.

    2000 - A) CIS / CFG Cooler installed. Low pressure Cyclone installed. Latest

    Technology LV- Tech Classifier installed in Raw mill Kiln capacity increased to

    2800 TPD. B) Green field Cement Plant with capacity of 1.1 Million was

    commissioned at Karikkali works

    2001- Rock breaker ( Terminator ) installed in mines.

    2003 - ISO 14001:2004 is implemented

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    6/72

    6

    2004 - Environment Management Service Certificate option.

    2004 - Fly Ash Silo construction work 5,000MT Capacity started

    2005 - Fly Ash Silo construction work completed.

    2006 - IS:ISO 18001:2000 is implemented

    2007 - Bag House installed in Raw Mill/Kiln Circuit

    2007- 15 MW Captive Power Plant erection work started

    1.2.2 The product offered by CCCL is as given below:

    ORDINARY PORTLAND CEMNT OPC-43, OPC-53

    PORTLAND POZZOLANA CEMENT (PPC)

    SULPHATE RESISTING PORTALND CEMENT

    PORTLAND SLAG CEMENT

    1.3 INDUSTRY PROFILE;

    Cement industry is one of the major industries in the industrial sector which affects

    the activities of industrial and constructional sector to great extent in India and world.

    Over this industry is also a part of the economical growth of our country.

    In the 18th

    century a British engineer named JOHN SEMEATIOR invited how to

    make cement for construction of the time. cement from process of lime and the roman

    invented volcanic ashinancient days.

    In the early 19th

    century the British engineer named joseph aspdin developed a

    kind of cement Portland .the newly developed cement and hence become popular in the

    market. In 1916 the Portland association was formal in Chicago.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    7/72

    7

    TYPES OF CEMENT;

    The various types of cement are produced in India

    Ordinary Portland cement

    Portland POZZOLANA cement

    Portland blast furnace slag cement

    Sulphate resistant Portland cement

    White cement

    1. Ordinary Portland cement

    it is also know as grey cement .it is manufactured by combining limestone,

    bauxite, and ironers and calking in a preheated kiln to produce clinker which is

    grounded with gypsum in a given proportion to produce opc .

    this cement is combined the proposition of clinker, and gypsum. The ratio is

    clinker 95%, and gypsum 5%.

    2. Portland pozzolana cement

    Using fly ash. whish is got a waste material makes this from thermal

    plants with clinker and gypsum in a different ratio. The ratio for clinker is 75% fly

    ash is 20%and gypsum5%

    3. Portland blast furnace slag cement

    This is manufacture by using slag. The standard mix of PBFSC is

    47.5% clinker 47.5% slag and gypsum5%.

    4. Pulphate resistant Portland cement

    This is a special type of cement mainly used in seashore area and sculpture

    content soil areas.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    8/72

    8

    Chapter-II

    2.1 Review of literature

    Abdul raheman and Mohamed nasr conducted a study on working capital

    management and profitability is a very important component of corporate finance

    because it directly affects the liquidity and profitability of the company. It deals with

    current assets and liabilities. Working capital management important due to many

    reasons. for one thing, the current assets typical manufacturing firm accounts for over

    half of its total assets. For a distribution company , they account for even more.

    Excessive in a firms realizing substandard return on investment. However firms with too

    few current assets may incur shortages and difficulties in maintaining smooth operation

    (horne and wachowicz,2000).efficient working capital management involves planning

    and controlling

    Net working capitals commonly defined as the difference between current assets and

    current liabilities. Efficient working capitals management requires that firms should

    operate with some amount of NWC. The exact amount varying from industry and

    depending among others things, on the nature of industry.

    The total working capitals requirements of a firm is determined by a variety of factors. It

    should be, however noted that these factors affects different enterprises differently. They

    also vary from time to time. In general, the following factors are involved in a proper

    assessment of the quantum of working capital requirements. An undertaking about the

    concepts in working capital was the results of reading from pillai. R.S.N.Bhagavathi,

    Management Accounting, and Dr.S.N.Maheswari Problems & Solutions in management

    Accounting & Financial Accounting.

    The working capital requirements of an enterprise are basically related to the conduct of

    the business. Some business need more working capital and vice versa. For example, the

    percentage of current assets was found to be lowest in hotels, restaurants and eating

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    9/72

    9

    house(10-20%),but in the case of construction and trading groups, it is to be expected a

    high working capital(80-90%). The various financial ratios play a significant role in

    revealing the financial healthiness of the organization. The ratios and its illustration were

    adapted from David Alexander& Anne Britton, Financial Reporting and

    Dr.Varna&Agar val, Financial Management.

    Production cycle was the key factor which has a bearing on the quantum of working

    capital is the production cycle. The term PRODUCTION CYCLE refers to the time

    involved the manufactures of goods. It covers the time span between the procurement of

    raw materials and the completion of production process. Funds or working capital is

    required in these stages.

    The working capital requirement are also determined by the nature of the business cycle.

    Business fluctuations lead to cyclical and seasonal changes which in turn, cause a shift in

    the working capital position, particularly temporary working capital requirement.

    The quantum of working capital is also determined by production policy. In the case of

    certain lines of business ,the demand for products is seasonal, i.e., it will be purchased

    during certain the need of more capital. An undertaking on the production process and

    key issues in production was achieved through readings from M.Y.Khan & P.K.Jain,

    Financial Management and Vinod K.M, Management Accounting.

    The level of working capital is also determined by credit policy which relates to sales and

    purchases. The credit policy influences the requirement of working capital in two ways

    a)Through credit terms granted by the firm to its customers.

    b)Credit terms available to the firm from its customers.

    These two will affect the working capitals need.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    10/72

    10

    As a company grows. It is logical to expect that a larger amount of Working capital will

    be required. It is , of course, difficult to determine precisely the relationship between the

    growth in the volume of business of a company and the increase in its working capital.

    The important detail on credit policy and plant for growth and expansion was generated

    from companys internal sources and records.

    An approach to research, The design, structure from reading from peasant Chandra,

    Financial Management Theory & Practice and Harrison Horngren, Financial

    Accounting.

    The data analyses method, tools used and processing of data based on standard statistical

    tools suggested in I.M.Pandey, Financial Management and R.Narayanaswamy ,

    Financial Management.

    The company profile was gathered from internal publications and internal records of the

    company.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    11/72

    11

    Chapter-III

    RESEARCHMETHODOLOGY

    3.1 AIM FOR THE STUDY

    To improve the working capital management of the company

    3.2.2Primary objectives:-

    To study the working capital management of chettinad cement corporation ltd

    for the period of2004-2009

    3.2.3 Secondary objectives:-

    To study the change in the working capital.

    To study composition of Current Assets and Current liabilities.

    To find out the growth value of working capital .

    To find out how current assets have been financed.

    To find out the variable and fixed component of working capital .

    3.3 RESEARCH DESIGN

    A research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection analysis of

    data is a manner that aims to complain relevance to the research purpose with economy in

    procedure. Research methodology of the study is only depends up on the following table.

    Nature of working statements

    Period of the study

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    12/72

    12

    3.3.1Nature working statement;

    The term recorded facts refers to the data taken out from accounting

    records.facts that have not been recrded in the financial books are not depicted in the

    financial statement

    3.3.2Period of the study :

    The study analyzing the working capital management of CHETTINADU

    CEMENT CORPORATION Ltd covers the financial years from 2004-05 to 2008-2009

    3.4 DATA COLLECTION

    3.4.1Secondary data:

    Secondary data has been collected from the annual reports of the company .The collected

    data has been processed and interpreted with financial tools and graphs . The tools used

    for the purpose of analysis the ratio analysis and schedule of changes in working capital

    3.5 RESEARCH TOOLS :

    Ratios

    Common size statement

    Schedule of changes in working capital management

    Operating cycle

    3.5.1RATIOS;

    Ratio analysis is a techniques of analysis and interpretation of financial

    statement. It is a process of establishing and interpretation of various ratio for helping in

    making certain decisions.

    However, ratio analysis is not an end itself. It is only a means of better understanding

    of financial strengths and weaknesses of a firm.

    CURRENT RATIO

    QUICK RATIO

    DEBTOR TURN OVER RATIO

    NET PROFIT RATIO

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    13/72

    13

    3.5.2COMMON SIZE STATEMENTS

    Under this method the changes in the figures of two years is calculated and

    percentage change is calculated by converting all the figures in terms of total liabilities or

    total assets.In other words the base to calculate the percentage change is kept the

    same;either Total Liabilities or Total Assets

    RATIO ANALYSIS

    Ratios represent the relationship between two or more variables.It is a technique of

    analyzingand interpreting the financial statements.It helps to find out the liquidity

    position and the solvency position of the firm.It indicates short-term as well as long-

    term solvency position of the firm it is the process of determination of various ratios

    for the purpose of decision-making.

    3.5.3WORKING CAPITALMANAGEMENT

    Capital required for purchase of raw material, and for meeting the day-to-

    day expenditure on salaries,wages ,rents advertising ect.,is called working capital. In

    other words, working capital refers to that part of a firms capital which is employed for

    short-term operations.

    THE length of the operating cycle of a manufacturing firm is the sum of

    1. inventory conversion period, and

    2. book debts conversion period

    the inventory conversion period is the total time needed for producing

    and selling the product. Typically it includes,

    a) raw materials conversion period

    b) work-in-progress

    c) finished goods conversation period

    the book debts conversation period is the required to collect outstanding

    amount from customers. The total of inventories conversion period and book debts

    conversion period is sometimes referred to as gross operating cycle.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    14/72

    14

    FINANCIAL CURRENT ASSETS

    Three of financial may be distinguished

    1. Long term

    2. Short-term financing

    3. Spontaneous financing

    The important source of long term financing are share, debentures, preference

    shares, retained earnings and long term debt from financial institutional short-tem

    financing refers to those sources of short term credit than the firms must average in

    advance. These sources include short term bank loans, commercial papers, factoring

    receivable and public deposit Spontaneous financing refers to the automatic sources of

    short term funds arising in the normal course of a business.

    3.5.4 OPERATING CYCLE

    Operating cycle is the time duration required to convert sales after the

    conversation of resources into inventories, into cash. The Operating cycle of a

    manufacturing company involve five phase:

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    15/72

    15

    OPERATING CYCLE A MAUNFACTURING FIRM

    Sales of the product either for cash or on credit. Credit sale creates book debts for

    collection.

    Debtors Sales

    CashFinished Goods

    Raw materialWork in progress

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    16/72

    16

    1. CURRENT RATIO

    Current Ratio is the relationship between current Asset and Current Liability. A

    current ration of2:1 is considered ideal. The current ratio of a firm measures its short

    term solvency. It indicates the availability of current asset in rupees for every one rupee

    of current liability.

    Current Assets

    Current Ratio = --------------------------

    Current Liabilities.

    2.QUICK RATIO

    Quick Ratio is also called as acid-test ratio or liquid ratio because; it is the acid

    test concerns financial soundness. It is the relationship between quick assets and quick

    liabilities. Quick assets are those assets which are readily converted into cash. The

    include cash and bank balance, bills receivable, debtors, short term investments. Quick

    liabilities include creditors, bills payable, outstanding expanses.

    Quick assets

    Quick ratio = --------------------

    Quick liabilities.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    17/72

    17

    CONTROL OF WORKING CAPITAL

    Working capital turnover ratio indicates the velocity of the utilization of net working.

    This ratio indicated the number of times the working capital is turned over in the course

    of a year. This ratio measures the efficiency with the working capital is being used by a

    firm.

    Net sales

    1. working capital turnover ratio = --------------------------

    Net working capital

    Gross working capital

    2. Gross working capital to fixed assets = ---------------------------

    Fixed assets

    Gross working capital

    3. Gross working capital to sales = ---------------------

    Sales

    Net working capital

    4. Net working capital to net worth = -----------------------------

    Net worth

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    18/72

    18

    CONTROL OF RECEIVABLEMANEGMENT

    A concern may sell goods on cash as well as on credit. Credit is one of the important

    element of sales promotion. The volume of sales can be increased by following a liberal

    credit policy. But the effect of liberal credit policy may result in typing up substantial

    funds of a firm in the forms of receivables.

    Annual credit sales

    1. Receivables turnover ratio =---------------------------------

    Average receivable

    Receivables at the end

    2. Receivable to sales = -------------------------------* 100

    Sales

    Receivables

    3. Receivable as a % of current assets =---------------------------* 100

    Current assets

    DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO;

    Debtors turnover ratio measures the number of times the receivables are rotated

    in a year in terms of sales. This ratio also indicates the efficiency of credit collection and

    efficiency of credit policy. This ratio is helpful in determining the operational efficiency

    of a business concern and the effectiveness of its credit policy. Debtors turnover ration

    can be calculated as follows:

    =Net Credit Sales / Average Receivables

    =Average Debtor =Opening Balance of Debtors + closing Balance of Debtors

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    19/72

    19

    CONTROL OF CASH MANAGEMENT

    sales

    1. cash turnover ratio =--------------------

    Cash balance

    Cash balances

    2. cash as a % of current assets =----------------------*100

    current assets

    NET PROFIT RATIO;

    This ratio measures the relationship between net profit and net sales. It indicates the

    efficiency of the overall operations of the firm. It shows what percentage of sales is left

    to the ratio year after is an indication of improving working conditions and vice versa.

    Net profit

    1. Net profit ratio =------------------------*100

    Sales

    Net profit(after interest& tax)

    2. Return on shareholders investment =----------------------------

    Shareholders funds

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    20/72

    20

    CONTROL OF INVENTORY MANAGEMENT

    Every firm has to maintain a certain level of inventory of finished goods so as to

    be able to meet the requirement of the business. But the level of inventory should neither

    be too high nor too low. It is harmful to hold more inventories. On the other hand, too

    low inventory may loss business opportunities. It is very essential to keep sufficient stock

    in business.

    Inventory Turnover Ratio indicates the number of time the stock has been turned

    over during the period and evaluated the efficiency with which a firm is able to manage

    its inventory. Inventory turnover ratio measures the velocity of conversion of stock into

    sales.

    Total inventory

    Ratio of inventory to sales =-------------------------

    Sales

    Net sales

    Inventory turnover ratio =---------------------------

    Inventory

    Inventory

    Inventory of current assets =--------------------------

    Current assets

    Sundry creditors

    Sundry creditors to inventory =-------------------------------

    Inventory

    Inventory

    Inventory to net working capital =---------------------------

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    21/72

    21

    Net Working capital

    OPERATING CYCLE

    Average of RM

    Raw materials =------------------------------------ *360

    Cost of materials

    Average of W.I.P

    Work in progress =----------------------------- *360

    Cost of production

    Average stock of FG

    Finished goods = -------------------------------- *360

    Cost of good sold

    Average debtors

    Debt collection period = ------------------------------- *360

    Credit sales

    Creditors

    Credit deferred period = ------------------------------ *360

    Credit purchase

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    22/72

    22

    3.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY:

    1. The annual reports of2004-05,2005-06,2006-07,2007-08 and 2008-09 were

    analyzed.

    2. Standered financial ratio was used to analyze the financial healthiness of

    the company.

    3. The contributors from experts and professional were used in the study to

    arrive inferences and suggestions.

    3.7 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY:

    1. Annual reports might be window dressed.

    2. Cross verification and inner breakup of the data were not gathering for

    analyses.

    3. Day to day working capital management would be a better indicator for

    estimating efficiency of working capital management. But the study was not able

    to perform the study on these directions.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    23/72

    23

    CHAPTER IV

    TABLE SHOWING CURRENT RATIO

    TABLE 4.1 (Rs. In lakhs)

    YEAR CURRENT ASSETS CURRENTLIABILITIES RATIO

    2004-05 11396 6934 1.64

    2005-06 16435 7928 2.07

    2006-07 17986 10768 1.67

    2007-08 21789 17296 1.26

    2008-09 40469 35837 1.13

    Sources: Annual report

    Inference;

    From the above table, it is found that in the year2005-2006 there was a

    satisfactory ratio after that there was an unsatisfactory ratio in 2004-2005 to 2008-2009.

    CHART SHOWING CURRENT RATIO

    CHART 4.1

    1.64

    2.07

    1.67

    1.261.13

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09year

    current ratio

    RATIO

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    24/72

    24

    TABLE SHOWING QUICK RATIO

    TABLE 4.2 (Rs. In lakhs)

    YEAR QUICK ASSETS QUICK LIABILITIES RATIO

    2004-05 5392 6934 0.78

    2005-06 6538 7928 0.82

    2006-07 7939 10768 0.74

    2007-08 13962 17296 0.81

    2008-09 23852 35837 0.67

    Sources: Annual report

    Inference;

    The quick ratio of the company shows less than one similarly it was below

    the standard level from the year of 2004-2009 because the standard ratio is

    1:1

    CHART SHOWING QUICK RATIO

    CHART 4.2

    0.780.82

    0.740.81

    0.67

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    RATIO

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    25/72

    25

    TABLE SHOWING WORKING CAPITAL

    TABLE 4.3 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period Net Sales Net Working Capital Ratio

    2004-05 40258 4462 9.02

    2005-06 47853 8507 5.63

    2006-07 58417 7218 8.09

    2007-08 84647 4493 18.84

    2008-09 110720 4632 23.90

    Sources: Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the working capital turnover ratio during the period

    2004-05 to 2008-2009. the position increasing 9.02%in the first year and then it has bean

    decreasing to5.63%in the year 2005-06 which has been increasing in the year2007-

    07to2008-2009.

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the working capital is

    23.90% in the year2008 09

    CHART SHOWING WORKING CAPITAL

    CHART 4.3

    9.02

    5.638.09

    18.84

    23.90

    0.00

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    year

    working capital turnover

    Ratio

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    26/72

    26

    TABLE SHOWING GROSS WORKING CAPITAL TO FIXED ASSETS

    TABLE 4.4 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period

    Gross Working

    Capital Fixed Assets Ratio

    2004-05 11396 42208 0.27

    2005-06 16435 44511 0.37

    2006-07 17986 48228 0.37

    2007-08 21789 52344 0.42

    2008-09 40469 84608 0.48

    Sources: Annual report

    Inference;

    From the above table it reveals that the net working capital during the period of

    2004-05to2008-09 it shows a constant increased to 0.27%,0.37%,0.37%0.42%,0.48%

    during these periods it increased respectively

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the gross working

    capital is 0.48% in the year2008-09.

    CHART SHOWING GROSS WORKING CAPITAL TO FIXED ASSETS

    CHART 4.4

    0.27

    0.37 0.370.42

    0.48

    0.000.050.100.15

    0.200.250.300.350.400.450.50

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    year

    Gross working capital to fixed assets

    Ratio

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    27/72

    27

    TABLE SHOWING NET WORKING CAPITAL TO NET WORTH

    TABLE 4.5 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period

    Net Working

    Capital Net worth Ratio

    2004-05 4462 13295 9.02

    2005-06 8507 14746 5.63

    2006-07 7218 17442 8.09

    2007-08 4493 26324 18.84

    2008-09 4632 39249 23.9

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the net working capital to net worth during

    the period 2004-05 to 2008-09. In the year2004-05 it has been 9.02% it has been

    decreased to 5.63% during the year2006-07 it has been increased to 8.09% and

    finally it increased to 23.9% the above table we can understand that the maximum

    position of the net working capital to net worth is 23.9% in the year2008-09.

    CHART SHOWING NET WORKING CAPITAL TO NET WORTH

    CHART 4..5

    9.02

    5.63

    8.09

    18.84

    23.9

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    28/72

    28

    TABLE SHOWING GROSS WORKING CAPITAL TO SALES

    TABLE 4.6 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period

    Gross Working

    Capital Sales Ratio

    2004-05 11396 40258 0.28

    2005-06 16435 47853 0.34

    2006-07 17986 58417 0.31

    2007-08 21789 84647 0.26

    2008-09 40469 110720 0.37

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the gross working capital to sales during the period

    2004-2005 to 2008-2009. this position increasing up to 0.28% and 0.34% d in the last two

    years and then it has been decreasing from 2006 to 07 it had been decreasing 0.31%and

    0.26%then it has been increasing last year 0.37

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the working

    capital is0.37% in the year2008-09

    CHART SHOWING GROSS WORKING CAPITAL TO SALES

    CHART 4.6

    0.28

    0.340.31

    0.26

    0.37

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    0.30

    0.35

    0.40

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    year

    Gross working cabital to sales

    Ratio

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    29/72

    29

    TABLE SHOWING DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO

    TABLE 4.7 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period Credit sales

    Average

    receivables Ratio

    2004-05 40258 1505 26.75

    2005-06 47853 1907 25.09

    2006-07 58417 1744 33.50

    2007-08 84647 1699 49.82

    2008-09 110720 1487 74.46

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the Debtor turnover ratio during the period 2004-05

    to 2008-09. Debtor turnover ratio of the firm it has been increased trend till the period

    2004-09 it has been increased up to 74.46% in the year2008-2009 respectively

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the Debtors

    turnover ratio is 74.46%in the year2008-09.Hence the credit collection is efficient.

    CHART SHOWING DEBTORS TURN OVER RATIO

    CHART4.7

    26.75 25.09

    33.50

    49.82

    74.46

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    YEAR

    Ratio

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    30/72

    30

    TABLE SHOWING DEBTORS TO SALES

    TABLE 4.8 (Rs. In lakhs)

    PERIOD DEBTOR SALES RATIO

    2004-05 1395 40258 3.47

    2005-06 1709 47853 3.57

    2006-07 2149 58417 3.68

    2007-08 2825 84647 3.34

    2008-09 2585 110720 2.33

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the debtor to sales during the period 2004-05 to 2008-09.

    In the year 2006-2007 it has been increasing up to 3.68% and for the following

    subsequent years it follows a decrease trend which comes down up to 2.33% in the year

    2008-09 respectively

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the

    Debtors to sales is 3.68 % in the year2006-2007.

    CHART SHOWING DEBTORS TO SALES

    CHART 4.8

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    3.47 3.573.68

    3.34

    2.33

    RATIO

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    31/72

    31

    TABLE SHOWING THE DEBTORS OF CURRENT ASSETS

    TABLE 4.9 Rs.In.Lakhs

    PERIOD DEBTOR CURRENT

    ASSETS

    RATIO

    2004-2005 1395 11396 12.24

    2005-2006 1709 16435 10.40

    2006-2007 2149 17986 11.95

    2007-2008 2825 21789 12.97

    2008-2009 2585 40469 6.35

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the debtor as a percentage of assets during the period 2003-

    04 to 2007-08. In the year2003-04 it has been 12.24% and for the following subsequent

    years it follows a decrease trend which comes down up to 6.39% in the year2007-08

    respectively

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the

    Debtors as a % of assets is 12.24% in the year2003-04.

    CHART SHOWING THE DEBTORS OF CURRENT ASSETS

    CHHART 4.9

    12.24

    10.40

    11.9512.97

    6.39

    0.00

    2.004.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    year

    debtors as a % of current assets

    RATIO

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    32/72

    32

    TABLE SHOWING CASH TURNOVER RATIO

    TABLE 4.10 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period Sales cash balances Ratio

    2004-05 40258 1395 28.86

    2005-06 47853 1709 28.00

    2006-07 58417 2149 27.18

    2007-08 84647 2825 29.96

    2008-09 110720 2585 42.83

    Sources: Annual reports

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the cash turnover ratio during period 2004-05 to

    2008-09.In the year2004-05 it was 28.86it has bean decreased in the year2005-07 as

    28 and 27.18 thereafter in the year2007-08 which is increased 29.96 and 42.83 in the

    year2008-09.

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the cash

    turnover ratio is 42.83% in the year2008-09

    CHART SHOWING CASH TURNOVER RATIO

    CHART 4.10

    28.86 28.00 27.1829.96

    42.83

    0.00

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    30.00

    35.00

    40.00

    45.00

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    year

    cash tunover ratio

    Ratio

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    33/72

    33

    TABLE SHOWING CASH AS APERCENTAGE OF CURRENT ASSETS

    TABLE 4.11 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period cash balances

    current

    assets Ratio

    2004-05 1395 11396 12.24

    2005-06 1709 16435 10.40

    2006-07 2149 17986 11.95

    2007-08 2825 21789 12.97

    2008-09 2585 40469 6.39

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the cash as a % current assets of firm has been

    fluctuating trend during period 2004-05 to 2008-09.when the current assets increased

    and profit also increased .In the year2004-05 the ratio was 12.24 and the next year

    which has been decreased as 10.40. Thereafter the ratio has been increasing tread.

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of cash as a

    percentage of current is 12.97% in the year2007-08

    CHART SHOWING CASH AS APERCENTAGE OF CURRENT ASSETS

    CHAART 4..11

    12.24

    10.4

    11.9512.97

    6.39

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    Ratio

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    34/72

    34

    TABLE SHOWING POSITION OF INVENTIRIES

    TABLE 4.12 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period Inventories

    Gross working

    capital Ratio %

    2004-05 6004 11396 53

    2005-06 9897 16435 60

    2006-07 10017 17986 56

    2007-08 7827 21789 36

    2008-09 16617 40469 41

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The table reveals that the position of inventory in Gross working capital from

    the year2004-05 to 2008-09 . In the year2005-06, the percentage of inventory in Gross

    working capital has increased and thereafter the same has been decreased respectively in

    the year2007 2008 to 2008-2009 it has increased

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the

    inventory is 60% in the year2005 06

    CHART SHOWING POSITION OF INVETORIES

    CHARRT 4.12

    5360

    56

    36 41

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09Year

    Invetories

    Ratio %

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    35/72

    35

    TABLE SHOWING POSITION OF SUNDRY DEBTORS

    TABLE 4.13 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period

    sundry

    debtors

    Gross working

    capital

    Ratio

    %

    2004-05 1505 11396 13

    2005-06 1907 16435 12

    2006-07 1744 17986 10

    2007-08 1699 21789 8

    2008-09 1487 40469 4

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The table showing the position of Sundry Debtors in Gross working capital

    from the year2004-05 to 2008-2009 . In the year2004-2005 it is 13% and thereafter in

    the year2008-09 it decreased to 4% respectively

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the Sundry

    Debtors is 13% in the year2004 2005.

    CHART SHOWING POSITION OF SUNDRY DEBTORS

    CHARRT 4.13

    1312

    108

    4

    024

    68

    101214

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09Year

    Sundry Debtors

    Ratio%

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    36/72

    36

    TABLE SHOWING POSITION OF CASH&BANK

    TABLE 4.14 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period

    Cash& Bank

    Balances

    Gross

    working

    capital

    Ratio

    %

    2004-05 1395 11396 12

    2005-06 1709 16435 10

    2006-07 2149 17986 12

    2007-08 2825 21789 13

    2008-09 2585 40469 6

    Inference;

    The above table analysis we can see the contribution of cash on the firm current

    asset. The cash position was decreasing in the year2008 2009 and then same has been

    finally it has been increased to 13 percentage and finally it has been decreased to 6

    percentage in the year2008 2009 respectively

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the Cash is 13

    percentage in the year2007 08.

    CHART SHOWING POSITION OF CASH&BANKCHART 4.14

    1210

    12 13

    6

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    1214

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09year

    cash&Bank balance

    Ratio %

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    37/72

    37

    TABLE SHOWING CASH AS A NET PROFIT RATIO

    TABLE 4.15 (Rs. In lakhs)

    YEAR NET PROFIT SALES RATIO

    2004-05 1396 40258 3.47

    2005-06 2796 47853 5.84

    2006-07 4006 58417 6.86

    2007-08 11471 84647 13.55

    2008-09 16377 110720 14.79

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    It indicates the efficiency of the overall operations of the firm. From the

    above graph it was clear that the net profit has constant growth in the prescribed years so

    we conclude that an increase in net profit ratio year after year is an indication of

    improving working conditions and vice versa.

    CHART SHOWING NET PROFIT RATIO

    CHART 4.15

    Net profit ratio

    3.475.84 6.86

    13.55 14.79

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09year

    Ratio

    RATIO

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    38/72

    38

    TABLE SHOWING POSITION OF LOANS AND ADVANCES

    TABLE 4.16 (Rs. In lakhs)

    PERIOD LOAN&ADVANCES GROSS

    CAPITAL

    WORKING

    RATIO %

    2004-05 2462 11396 22

    2005-06 2904 16435 18

    2006-07 4072 17986 22

    2007-08 9434 21789 43

    2008-09 19780 40669 49

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table analysis we can see the contribution of Loans and Advances on

    the firm current asset. The Loans And Advances position has increased as 22% . In the

    first years and then the same has been decreased to 18% and in the subsequent year it has

    been increased up to22%&43%&49%in the year2006-07 to 2008-09 respectively

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the

    Loans and Advances is 49% in the year2008 2009.

    CHART SHOWING POSITION OF LOANS AND ADVANCES

    CHART 4.16

    2004-052005-06 2006-07

    2007-082008-09

    Ratio%

    2218 22

    4349

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    year

    loans&advance

    Ratio%

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    39/72

    39

    TABLE SHOWING COMPOSITION OF CURRENT ASSETS FOR THE YEAR

    (2004-05 TO 2008-09) TABLE NO4.17

    articular

    2004-

    05

    2005-

    06

    2006-

    07

    2007-

    08

    2008-

    09

    Inventories 53 60 56 36 41

    Sundry debtors 13 12 10 8 4

    Cash& bank

    balances 12 10 12 13 6

    Loans&

    advances 22 18 22 43 49

    Total 100 100 100 100 100

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table it is found that the Debtors has been at the maximum of 13%

    during the year2

    004 05 , stock maximum contribution is 60% in the year2

    005-06 ,cash and bank balance maximum contribution is 13% in the year2007-08 and Loans and

    Advances maximum contribution is 49.% in the year2008-09

    The above table we can clearly understand maximum contribution of 60%

    inventories in current assets.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    40/72

    40

    CHART SHOWING COMPOSITION OF CURRENT ASSETS FOR THE YEAR

    2004-05 TO 2008-09

    CHART 4.17

    53 13 12 22

    60 12 10 18

    56 10 12 22

    36 8 13 43

    41 46 49

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Ratio

    2004-05

    2005-06

    2006-07

    2007-08

    2008-09

    year

    composition of current assets

    Inventories

    Sundrydebtors

    Cash&bankbalances

    Loans&advances

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    41/72

    41

    TABLE SHOWING POSITION OF SUNDRY CREDITORS

    TABLE NO4.18 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period sundry creditors Total liabilities Ratio %

    2004-05 3657 6934 52.74

    2005-06 3433 7928 43.30

    2006-07 4608 10768 42.79

    2007-08 4197 17296 24.27

    2008-09 11282 35837 31.48

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the position of sundry current liabilities from the

    period 2004-05 to 2008-09. In the year2004-09, the percentage of sundry creditors in

    total current liabilities has been decreased to 43% it has bean increased 44%

    respectively in the year2008-2009

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the

    Liabilities is 52.74% in the year2004-05

    CHART SHOWING POSITION OF SUNDRY CREDITORS

    CHART 4.18

    5360

    56

    36 41

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09Year

    CREDITORS

    Ratio %

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    42/72

    42

    TABLE SHOWING POSITION OF OTHER LIABILITIES

    TABLE NO4.19 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period other liabilities Total liabilities Ratio %

    2004-05 2166 6934 31.24

    2005-06 2401 7928 30.29

    2006-07 3151 10768 29.26

    2007-08 3260 17296 18.85

    2008-09 4358 35837 12.16

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the position of other liabilities from the period 2004-

    05 to 2008-09. In the year2004-09, the percentage of creditors in total current liabilities

    has been decreased to 12.16% it has bean respectively in the year2008-2009

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the Liabilities is

    31.24% in the year2004-05.

    CHART SHOWING POSITION OF OTHER LIABILITIES

    CHART 4.19

    52.74

    43.30 42.79

    24.27

    31.48

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    Ratio

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    year

    Ratio%

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    43/72

    43

    TABLE SHOWING POSITION OF PROVISION

    TABLE 4.20 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period Provision

    Total

    Liabilities Ratio %

    2004-05 851 6934 12

    2005-06 1872 7928 24

    2006-07 3009 10768 28

    2007-08 9839 17296 57

    2008-09 20197 35837 56

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The table shows the position in total current liabilities from the period 2004-2005

    to 2008-2009 . in the year 2004 05 it is12% and subsequent year the same has bean

    increased to 24%,28%,57%,and finally decreased 56%in the year2008-09 respectively .

    The above table we can understand that the maximum position of the provision is

    57% in the year2007-08.

    CHART SHOWING POSITION OF PROVISION

    CHART 4.20

    provision

    12

    24

    28

    57

    56 2004-05

    2005-05

    2006-07

    2007-08

    2008-09

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    44/72

    44

    TABLE SHOWING COMPOSITION OF CURRENT LIABILITES FOR THE

    YEAR 2004-05 TO 2008-09 TABLE 4.21

    Particular 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    sundry

    creditors 52.74 43.3 42.79 24.27 31.48

    other

    liabilities 35.26 30.29 29.21 18.73 12.16

    Provision 12 26.41 28 57 56.36

    Total 100 100 100 100 100

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table it is found that the sundry creditors has been at the maximum of88% during the year2004-05 , provisions maximum contribution is 57% during the year

    2007-08.

    The above table we can clearly understand maximum contribution of 88% sundry

    creditors in current liabilities

    CHART SHOWING COMPOSITION OF CURRENT LIABILITES FOR THE

    YEAR 2004-05 TO 2008-09

    CHART 4.21

    52.74 35.26 12

    43.3 30.29 26.41

    42.79 29.21 28

    24.27 18.73 57

    31.48 12.16 56.36

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    ratio

    2004-05

    2005-06

    2006-07

    2007-08

    2008-09

    yearsundarycreditors

    otherliabilities

    Provision

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    45/72

    45

    TABLE SHOWING GROWTH VALUE OF WORKING CAPITAL

    TABLE 4.22 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period Net working capital Growth value

    2004-05 4462 0

    2005-06 8507 1.91

    2006-07 7218 0.85

    2007-08 4493 0.62

    2008-09 4632 1.03

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table reveals that the growth value of the working capital during the

    period 2004-05 to 2008-09. In the year2005-06 it was 1.91% and it shows a decreasing

    trend up to 0.62% and it has increasing 1.03%in 2008-09 respectively.

    The above table we can understand that the growth value of the

    working capital is 1.91% in the year2005-2006

    CHART SHOWING GROWTH VALUE OF WORKING CAPITAL

    CHART 4.22

    Growthvalue

    0

    1.91

    0.85

    0.62

    1.03

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    year

    Growth value

    Growthvalue

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    46/72

    46

    TABLE SHOWING OPTIMUM LEVEL OF CURRENT ASSETS

    TABLE 4.23 (Rs. In lakhs)

    Period short-term financing long term financing

    2004-05 6934 46670

    2005-06 7928 53018

    2006-07 10768 53807

    2007-08 17296 56895

    2008-09 35837 89298

    Source; Annual report

    Inference;

    The above table shows the optimum level of current assets and liabilities for the

    year 2003-04 to 2007-08 .the short term financing starts with Rs 6934 and it shows a

    uptrend throughout the year and similarly it happened same for short term financing

    CHART SHOWING OPTIMUM LEVEL OF CURRENT ASSETS

    CHART 4.23

    0

    20000

    40000

    60000

    80000

    100000

    120000

    140000

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

    year

    Assets

    short-term financing longterm financing

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    47/72

    47

    TABLE SHOWING VARIABLE COST

    TABLE 4.24

    Period Variable w/c Total w/c Fixed w/c

    2004-05 14012 11396 2616

    2005-06 45720 16435 29285

    2006-07 15651 17986 2335

    2007-08 42105 21789 20316

    2008-09 225494 40469 185025

    CHART SHOWING VARIABLE COST

    CHART 4.24

    0

    50000

    100000150000

    200000

    250000

    2004-052005-062006-072007-082008-09

    year

    cost

    totalw/c fixedw/c

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    48/72

    48

    Variable cost for the year 2004-05

    11396-9663

    Variable cost =--------------------

    127-113

    1733

    =-----------

    14

    =124*113

    Variable cost =14012/-

    Total cost =11396/-

    Fixed cost = variable cost total cost

    = 14012-11396

    = 2616/-

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    49/72

    49

    Variable cost for the year 2005-06

    16435-11396

    Variable cost =--------------------

    127-113

    5039

    =-----------

    14

    =360*127

    Variable cost =45720/-

    Total cost =16435/-

    Fixed cost = variable cost total cost

    = 45720-16435

    = 29285/-

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    50/72

    50

    Variable cost for the year 2006-07

    17986-16435

    Variable cost =--------------------

    141-127

    1551

    =-----------

    14

    =111*141

    Variable cost =15651/-

    Total cost =17986

    Fixed cost = variable cost total cost

    = 15651-17986

    = 2335

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    51/72

    51

    Variable cost for the year 2007-08

    21789-17986

    Variable cost =--------------------

    155-141

    3803

    =-----------

    14

    =271

    Variable cost =42105/-

    Total cost =21789

    Fixed cost = variable cost total cost

    = 42105-21789

    = 20316

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    52/72

    52

    Variable cost for the year 2008-09

    40469-21789

    Variable cost =--------------------

    169-155

    18680

    =-----------

    14

    =1334*169

    Variable cost =225494/-

    Total cost =40469/-

    Fixed cost = variable cost total cost

    = 225494-40469

    = 185025/-

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    53/72

    53

    Changes of working capital for theyear 2004-05 to 2005-06

    (Rs. In lakhs)

    Current assets 2004

    -05 2005-06 Increase Decrease

    Inventories 6004 9897 3893

    Sundry debtors 1505 1907 402

    Other current assets 30 18 12

    Cash& bank balances 1395 1709 314

    Loans &advances 2462 2904 442

    Total current assets 11396 16435

    Current liabilities

    Liabilities 6083 6056 27

    Provision 851 1872 1021

    Total Current

    liabilities

    6934 7928

    Net working capital 4462 8507 4095

    Total 8507 8507 5078 5078

    Source; Annual report

    Inference:

    The above table it is clear that the working capital has increased Rs.4045, in the year of

    2005-06.

    The analysis of the table it is clearly understood that the current liabilities have been

    decreased by Rs.1021 in the year2005-06.

    The analyzed table we can clearly understand that working capital has been

    Increased by Rs. 4,045 in the year2005-2006

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    54/72

    54

    Changes of working capital for theyear 2005-06 to 2006-07

    (Rs. In lakhs)

    Current assets 2005-06 2006-07 Increase Decrease

    Inventories 9897 10017 120

    Sundry debtors 1907 1744 163

    Other current assets 18 4 14

    Cash& bank balances 1709 2149 440

    Loans &advances 2904 4072 1168

    Total current assets 16435 17986

    Current liabilities

    Liabilities 6056 7759 1703

    Provision 1872 3009 1137

    Total Current

    liabilities

    7928 10768

    Net working capital 8507 7218 1289

    Total 85087 8507 3017 3017

    Source; Annual report

    Inference:

    The above table, it is clear that the working capital has decreased to Rs.1289 in

    the year of2006-07 because the sundry debtors and other current assets Rs. 163 and 14

    have been decreased. In the mean while the current liabilities have bean decreased by Rs.

    2,840.

    The above table shows the changes of working capital as decreased by Rs. 1289 in the

    year2006-07.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    55/72

    55

    Changes of working capital for theyear 2006-07 to 2007-08

    (Rs. In lakhs)

    Current assets 2006-07 2007-08 Increase Decrease

    Inventories 10017 7827 2190

    Sundry debtors 1744 1699 45

    Other current assets 4 4

    Cash& bank balances 2149 2825 676

    Loans &advances 4072 9434 5362

    Total current assets 17986 21789

    Current liabilities

    Liabilities 7759 7457 302

    Provision 3009 9839 6830

    Total Current

    liabilities

    10768 17296

    Net working capital 7218 4493 2725

    Total 7218 7218 9065 9065

    Source; Annual report

    Inference:

    The above table, it is clear that the working capital has decreased to Rs.2,725 in

    the year of2

    007-08 because the inventories and sundry debtors Rs.2

    ,190 and 45 have been decreased. In the mean while the current liabilities have bean decreased by Rs.

    6,830.

    The above table shows the changes of working capital as decreased by Rs. 2,725 in the

    year2007-08.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    56/72

    56

    Changes of working capital for theyear 2007-08 to 2008-09

    (Rs. In lakhs)

    Current assets 2007-08 2008-09 Increase Decrease

    Inventories 7827 16617 8790

    Sundry debtors 1699 1487 212

    Other current assets 4 4

    Cash& bank balances 2825 2585 240

    Loans &advances 9434 19780 10346

    Total current assets 21789 40469

    Current liabilities

    Liabilities 7457 15640 8183

    Provision 9839 20197 10358

    Total Current liabilities 17296 35837

    Net working capital 4493 4632 139

    Total 4632 4632 19136 19136

    Source; Annual reportInference

    The above table it is clear that the working capital has increased Rs.139, in the

    year of2008-09.

    The analysis of the table it is clearly understood that the current liabilities, provision

    have been decreased by Rs.8183,10358 in the year2008-09.

    The analyzed table we can clearly understand that working capital has been

    Increased by Rs. 139 in the year2008-2009

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    57/72

    57

    OPERATING CYCLE (2004-05 )

    Average of RM

    Raw materials =------------------------------------ *360

    Cost of materials

    802

    = ________ *360

    4667

    = 62 days

    Average of W.I.P

    Work in progress =----------------------------- *360

    Cost of production

    880

    = --------------------------- *360

    32043

    = 10 days

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    58/72

    58

    Average stock of FG

    Finished goods = -------------------------------- *360

    Cost of good sold

    229*360

    = ----------------------------

    40258

    =2 days

    Average debtors

    Debt collection period = ------------------------------- *360

    Credit sales

    2476 *360

    =---------------------

    20258

    =44 days

    Creditors

    Credit deferred per = ------------------------------ *360

    Credit purchase

    913 *360

    =---------------------

    8997

    =37

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    59/72

    59

    OPERATING CYCLE ( 2005-06 )

    Average of RM

    Raw materials =------------------------------------ *360

    Cost of materials

    641

    =________ *360

    6522

    =35 days

    Average of W.I.P

    Work in progress =----------------------------- *360

    Cost of production

    942

    =----------------------------- *360

    38432

    = 9 days

    Average stock of FG

    Finished goods = -------------------------------- *360

    Cost of good sold

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    60/72

    60

    288

    = ---------------------------- * 360

    47853

    =2 days

    Average debtors

    Debt collection period = ------------------------------- *360

    Credit sales

    1907 *360

    =---------------------

    23926

    = 29 days

    Creditors

    Credit deferred period = ------------------------------ *360

    Credit purchase

    1165 *360

    =---------------------

    11477

    =37 days

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    61/72

    61

    OPERATING CYCLE ( 2006-07 )

    Average of RM

    Raw materials =------------------------------------ *360

    Cost of materials

    1296

    =________ *360

    8379

    =55 days

    Average of W.I.P

    Work in progress =----------------------------- *360

    Cost of production

    280

    =------------------------- *360

    46516

    = 2 days

    Average stock of FG

    Finished goods = -------------------------------- *360

    Cost of good sold

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    62/72

    62

    3437

    = ---------------------------- * 360

    58417

    =21 days

    Average debtors

    Debt collection period = ------------------------------- *360

    Credit sales

    1744 *360

    =---------------------

    58417

    = 21 days

    Creditors

    Credit deferred period = ------------------------------ *360

    Credit purchase

    4020 *360

    =---------------------

    15539

    = 93 days

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    63/72

    63

    OPERATING CYCLE ( 2007-08 )

    Average of RM

    Raw materials =------------------------------------ *360

    Cost of materials

    2114

    =________ *360

    11026

    =69 days

    Average of W.I.P

    Work in progress =----------------------------- *360

    Cost of production

    3847

    =-------------------------- *360

    60714

    =23 days

    Average stock of FG

    Finished goods = -------------------------------- *360

    Cost of good sold

    1971

    = ---------------------------- * 360

    84647

    = 8 days

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    64/72

    64

    Average debtors

    Debt collection period = ------------------------------- *360

    Credit sales

    1699*360

    =---------------------

    42323

    = 14 days

    Creditors

    Credit deferred period = ------------------------------ *360

    Credit purchase

    4402 *360

    =---------------------

    21376

    = 74 days

    OPERATING CYCLE ( 2008-09 )

    Average of RM

    Raw materials =------------------------------------ *360

    Cost of materials

    140092

    =________ *360

    3964069

    =13 days

    Average of W.I.P

    Work in progress =----------------------------- *360

    Cost of production

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    65/72

    65

    3536

    =-------------------------- *360

    76027

    =17 days

    Average stock of FG

    Finished goods = -------------------------------- *360

    Cost of good sold

    3646

    = ---------------------------- * 360

    110720

    = 54 days

    Average debtors

    Debt collection period = ------------------------------- *360

    Credit sales

    1487*360

    =---------------------

    110720

    = 10 days

    Creditors

    Credit deferred period = ------------------------------ *360

    Credit purchase

    7739 *360

    =---------------------

    30438

    = 92 days

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    66/72

    66

    Table showing Summary of operating cycle for the year

    2004 05 to 2008 09

    Particular 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    operating cycle

    ICP

    RMCP 62 35 55 69 13

    WIPCP 10 9 2 23 17

    FGCP 2 74 2 46 21 78 8 100 54 84

    Add;

    Debtors covered period 44 29 21 14 10

    Lees ;

    Credit deferred period 37 37 93 74 92

    Net operating 81 38 6 40 2

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    67/72

    67

    Inference;

    The above table shows that the inventory conversion period (icp), debtors

    collection period and creditors deferred period

    If we compare the inventory conversion period in 2008 inventory conversion

    period (84days) and the debtors collection period has 10 days to collect the debt as it was

    low when compare to other years ,the creditors deferred period has been increased to 92

    days

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    68/72

    68

    5.1 FINDINGS:

    The analyzed data we can inferred that the working capital has increased finally to

    rs 139 lakhs this shows the best utilization of cash

    The analyzed table we can clearly understand that working capital has been

    Increased by Rs. 4,045 in the year2005-2006

    The analyzed table shows the changes of working capital as decreased by Rs.

    1289 in the year2006-07.

    The analyzed table shows the changes of working capital as decreased by Rs.

    2,725 in the year2007-08.

    The analyzed table we can clearly understand that working capital has been

    Increased by Rs. 139 in the year2008-2009.

    The analyzed table we can understand that the maximum position of the inventory

    is 60% in the year2005 06

    The analyzed table we can understand that the maximum position of the Sundry

    Debtors is 13% in the year2004 2005

    The analyzed table we can understand that the maximum position of the Cash is

    13% in the year2007 08.

    The analyzed table we can understand that the maximum position of the Loans

    and Advances is 49% in the year2008 2009.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    69/72

    69

    The analyzed table we can clearly understand maximum contribution of 60%

    inventories in current assets.

    The analyzed table we can understand that the maximum position of the

    Liabilities is 88% in the year2004-05

    The analyzed table we can understand that the maximum position of the provision

    is 57% in the year2007-08.

    The analyzed table we can clearly understand maximum contribution of 88%

    sundry creditors in current liabilities.

    The analyzed table we can understand that the growth value of the working

    capital is 1.91% in the year2004-2005.

    The overall Net operating cycle concludes that the creditors deferred period is

    better than debt collection period.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    70/72

    70

    5.2 SUGGESTIONS:

    To have a good return the company should reduce the manufacturing expenses.

    The company can increase its Net Profit level which has been increased indicating

    a better performance by the company

    The company has invested more in Fixed Assets rather they can diversify their

    investment which will bring more profit to the Company.

    The company should maintain the current ratio in a consistence manner because

    the ratio reflected the ability of the company to meet its current ability.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    71/72

    71

    5.3 CONCLUSION

    According to this study, the working capital management of

    Chettinad Cement Corporation limited has a better position. The variables

    chosen for the study helped in determining the position of the concern

    consequently for the past five years. The companys position in terms of

    finance is satisfactory.

  • 8/6/2019 AMAR Project 1

    72/72