8/20/2019 Pedro Igor Duarte, A095 874 153 (BIA July 8, 2015)
1/6
Poarch, ChristinePoarch L aw Firm,PC203 South College AvenueSalem, VA 24153
Name:DUARTE,PEDROIGOR
U.S. Departmnt of Justice
Executive Oce r Immigation Revew
Board of Immigtion ApelsOce of h Crk
5107 Leesburg Pike, Sut 200Fal Chc. Vn 53
DHS IT.ork Co PrisonOR3400 Concord oadYork,PA 17402
A 095-87 4-153
Date of this notice 7 /8/2015
nclosed s a copy of he Board's decison and orde n the aboe-reerenced case.
ncosure
Mb B
Sncerel,
Do ctDona CrChie Clek
j
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visitwww.irac.net/unpublished/index/
g
g p p
Cite as: Pedro Igor Duarte, A095 874 153 (BIA July 8, 2015)
8/20/2019 Pedro Igor Duarte, A095 874 153 (BIA July 8, 2015)
2/6
U.S epament f JusticeExecutive Ofce r Imiation Review
Decision of e Bod of Igtion Appeas
Flls Chch, Vrginia 2053
F: A095 874 153 - York, PA
I r: PERO IGO ARTE k Pdro gor
IN MOVAL PROCEEING
PPEL
:
ON BEHAF OF PONENT: Cr Loh Porh Eqr
ON BEHAF OF H: y T Bbor Aoy
ORE:
JUL - 8 2015
T Bod h dvd h h D o Hold y' (DH) l h
b hdr See 8 CFR § 10034 hr og ow dg br h Bod
h rord rd o h Io Co who r o
OR THE BOR
g g p p
Cite as: Pedro Igor Duarte, A095 874 153 (BIA July 8, 2015)
8/20/2019 Pedro Igor Duarte, A095 874 153 (BIA July 8, 2015)
3/6
I •
�·
Poarch Law irm PC
Poh Chrstne
UNITED SAES DEPARME OF JUSICEEXECUIVE OICE OR IMMIGIO REVIEW
IMMIGRAION COUR
300 CONCORD ROD, SUIE 2
YORK PA 740
20 Souh Colege Avee
Sae A 245
I HE MATR O
DARE PEDRO IGOR
9488-0
FILE 05-8753
UABLE O ORWARD NO ADDRESS PROIDED
DE: Apr 10 205
' ACED IS A COPY O E DECISIO O E MMIGRION JUDGE. IS DECISON4
IS FINA UNESS APPEA IS FILED I E BORD O IMMIGION APPESWIIN 30 CAEDAR DAYS O E DAE O E MAILNG O IS WRIEN DECISIO.
SEE E ENCLOSED ORMS AD INSRUCIOS OR PROPERLY PREARIG YOUR APPE
YOR NOICE O APPEA AACED DOCUMENS AD EE OR EE WAIVER REQUESMS BE MAILED O BORD O IMMIGRAION APPEAS
OFICE OF E CLERK
07 eesb Pike Se 2000
AS CURCH VA 20530
AACED IS A COP O E DECISIO O HE IMMIGAION UDGE AS HE RESUL
O YOUR AILURE O APPEAR A YOUR SCEDULED DEPORAIO OR REMOVL EARNG
IS DECISION IS INAL UNLESS A MOION O REOPEN S IED IN ACCORDACE
SECION 2B) (3 O E IMIGRAON ND NIONLIY AC 8 USC.SECION 252B{ IN DEPORAIO PROCEEDGS OR SECION 240 6
8 USC SECION 229 6 IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS. IF YOU ILE MOIOO REOPEN YOUR MOIO MUS E ILED I IS COUR
OER
IMMIGON COUR
300 COCORD ROAD SUIE 2
YORK PA 702
DVQ
COUR CERK
IMMGRIO COUR
CC DISRIC COUNSEL C/ YOK PRISON
300 CONCORD ROAD
YOR A 702000
g
g p p ,
8/20/2019 Pedro Igor Duarte, A095 874 153 (BIA July 8, 2015)
4/6
.
.
IN THE MAER OF:
DUARTE dro gor
Respnet
UNITED STATES DEPARTMEN OF JUSICEEXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRAION REVIEW
UNITED SATES IMMIGRTION COURT
YORK, PENNSYLVNIA
) IN REMOVL PROCEEDINGS)) Fe# 095-87413
ON BEHLF OF RESPONDENT: ) ON BEHALF OF HE DHS
ra co qhr oarch q.
Mtin: rmao by od
Ruling on Motion ad Ore
od a 29yarod g ma a a av ad cz of raz who
acao r ajum of au urua o § 24 adm wh a § 212(h)
wavr o admby a grad by a mmgrao judg o ay 5 2010 a aco h rova rocdg o ovbr 1 2014 wh roa rvc of a oc oar orm 862 od ha ubd a oo o ra; h govr haubd a rf uor of ovably.
od ad covcd o a fraud volao of . § 1341 o arch 6
24 ad ry rvg h ro c of 24 oh h crux of rod'
moo ha h add guy o $900 o o a a ru of h covco ad hrfor h
govrm cao burd o roo by car ad covcg vdc r §240(c)(3)() o abh h rmovaby ovrm cou o o h r a
agrm ad h a cooquy arg ha rod agrd ha h o o h vc
xcdd $1000; govr cou ao o ou ha h aou of ruo od
wa $28210
od do o du ha h fdra covco cou a raud of
oy ha h o a a ru of h covco wa l ha $1000 h hrhod amouudr 101(a)(43)(()() h rgard rod mhaz ha h add guy oou 12 ad 3 of h dcm whr ach cou h o amou a $300
ovm cou do o co ha rod add guy o cou 13 or ha h oa lo umrad wh h hr cou $9000 argu ha rod
ckogd h wr guy a exhibit ad h a colloquy exhibit J ha h oal o a grar ha $100 h my o
Exhibit C h udg rcg a guly a o cou 12 ad 3 xhibit H
h dcm ag 3 of whch cf a o amou o $3000 for ach cou h wra agrm ur h aragah d "a rod rcogz ha hr
1
p p
8/20/2019 Pedro Igor Duarte, A095 874 153 (BIA July 8, 2015)
5/6
may b mmgraon consquncs o hs guly pla and ha a loss amon xcdng $1000wll · prsumpvly rsl n hs rmoval Govrnmn counsl rads hs as rspondnaknowldgng ha h loss xcdd $1000 Th cour rads hs as no mor hanrspondn bng apprsd o h mmgraon consqncs f h chos o plad gly; hsnocaon dos no n any way qua o rspondn acknowldgng ha h s pladng guly o a loss xcdng $10000 or ohrws bnds hm hro
Th pla colloquy a eiit - also dos no rval any admsson by rsondn hahs gly pla ncluds h loss o Connnal Arlns (couns 13) xcdng $1000 On pag12 o h docmn h proscuor norms h dsrc cour ha h "nr loss amoun for
h whol cr s sll ovr n grand Jus prvously on pag 11 h proscor nrms hdsrc cor ha n paragraph wo o h pla agrmn [rspondn] s pladng guly omal raud n volaon o Tl 18 Und Sas Cod Scon 1341 whr h loss amounxcds $10 rmoval s prsumpvly mandaory. Whn h cour askd rspondnwhhr h dscussd "hs wh hs aorny manng h mmgraon consquncs o hsguly pla), rspondn rpld ys.
Whhr h dral proscuor blvd ha rspondn agrd ha h was pladng
gly o a loss grar han $1000 s nhr hr nor hr s clar ha h pladd gly o only couns 13 no ha h was pladng guly o causng h loss o Connnal Arlns ofmor han $100. Whl prhaps h languag n h pla agrmn could b mprovd formor clary hs sgnaur hron dos no n any way alr h acal guly pla. Undr hparagraph nld "Chang o Pla sas ha Dndan xprssly and qvocallyadms ha h commd h crms chargd n Couns 13 o h ndcmn Whl allcouns whn h ndcmn do rlc losss mch grar han $10000. all ohr couns arrrlvan
As rspondn pons ou h Thrd Crc rqrs actual losss undr INA §11a)43)M)) and mor spccally h losss us b hrd o an acual ons andsch losss ay no ncld any amouns basd on acqual or dsmssd cons. Alaka v. A'Gn. 456 F.3d 88 106 3d Cr. 206) hold was lgal rror or h IJ o consdr hamoun o nndd loss r all o h chargs rahr han h sngl coun or whch sh wasconvcd)
Fnally n hs parcular cas h rsuon amoun s rrlan snc w now hspcc amoun o loss. Rsuon may only b consdrd h loss amoun s no ohrwsclar rom h convcon rcord n Mnro v Ashcrof 353 F.3d 225 3d Cr 203) h ThrdCrcu phld h Boards ndng ha h alns convcon nvolvd a loss xcdng $100and hror h rducon n rsuon had no lgal c on ha ac Thus h corconcludd inter aia, ha h
"amon of rson ordrd as a rsl o a convcon may b hlpl o acours nqury no h amoun o loss o h vcm f h pla agrmn or hndcm s unclar as o h loss srd. B whn h amon o rsuonordrd s no basd on a ndng as o h amoun o h loss . h amo orson s no conrollng.
2
g g p p
8/20/2019 Pedro Igor Duarte, A095 874 153 (BIA July 8, 2015)
6/6
� .
Based upon the foregoing, the cout concurs with respondent that thegovrment as not met its burden of proof tat the conviction loss exceeded $10000.s requied or an aggravated eony faud conviction as set f t at INA §101(a)(43)M)(i) Wile these poceedings must be teminated by all appearancesespodent seems utimatey headed r reova given his crimina arrest record fhistory is any indication uess he quickly reorms, respondent wi be back be e thecour at some point in the future The outcoe of that case soud be freboding torespondent The folowing order is hereby entered
Oder: The ground of aggravated felony A § 237(a 2)(A)iii), is dismissed and theseemova proceedings ar y rminted "
Ar 10 2015
ater A Durlingmmigration Judg
3
g g p p
Top Related