8/18/2019 Samuel Perez Hernandez, A200 155 042 (BIA April 4, 2016)

1/7

Encinas, Eduardo Lachica

U.S Department of Jusice

Executive Oce r Immgraon Revew

Board of Immigration AppelsOce of the Cerk

5107 Leesburg Pike, Sul 2000Fas Chrc Vrn 2204/

Law Oices of Eduardo Encinas & Assoc.701 S Atlantic Blvd. Suite 309

DHS/ ICE Office of Chief Counsel - LOS606 S Olive Street 8th FloorLos Angeles CA 90014

Monterey Park CA 9154

Name: PEREZ HERNANDE SAMUEL A 200-155-042

Date of this notice 4/ 4/ 2016

ncosed s a copy of the Boad's decison and order the above-erenced case.

nclose

Pael Membrs:O'Ly, Bin .nn i AnGundlbg Joh

Sincerely,

Do CWDoa Ca

Chie Clek

Useea Dockt

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visitwww.irac.net/unpublished/index/

Cite as: Samuel Perez Hernandez, A200 155 042 (BIA April 4, 2016)

8/18/2019 Samuel Perez Hernandez, A200 155 042 (BIA April 4, 2016)

2/7

· US m Executive Oce r Imgron Revew

Decso of e Board of grao Appea

Fal Chrch, Vrga 2041

ile A200 155 042-os eles, CA

n e: MEL PREZ EADZIN MOVA ROCDGPPEAL

Dae:

ON BEHALF PONDENT Edudo Ecinas, sqe

PLCON: Reoenn

A?R - 4 2016

e spodet a naive d ciizen of Mexico, was odeed eoved in absenia onebay 2, 013 On c 013, te espoden ed a oion o eoe oceeds,wich Iao Jude deied on Octoe , 014. he esonden ed a ely appeao a decisio e apa wi e susained poceds wi be eopeed d te ecod wil e ed

e Bod evews a Iraio Judes ds o ct, incudn dns s to ecedil o testony, de th cey eoeous sdd 8 CF § 100d))) eBod evews quesons of law, disceton d judet d al oe isses apeals odcsions o iaton udes de nov

pon de nov eview of he ecod d lh of e otiy of cicstces sented  hs case, we conclude at the esoden donstated a eopin is wed1 Seesecions 40())(C)), (e)) of the aton nd Nationi Act, 8 C§ 129a())(C)(i), (e)() We wl eee sstain t esoden's apeal d ed heecod te poceedns

OER e esondets aea s sstd, te n absenia od is vacated oceedins eoeed nd t ecod is eaded to Iiaio ude e oceedings nd e nt o a new decsio

OB �

1 Aon oh ctos, we have cosee tt tee dvduas stated ude o tha teyeceved a teeone ca ccen te e , 03 ein

  g

  g

  p  p

8/18/2019 Samuel Perez Hernandez, A200 155 042 (BIA April 4, 2016)

3/7

'-

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUTICEEXECUTIVE OFICE FOR IMMIGTION REVIEWIMMIGTION COURT606 OUTH OLIVE T.LOS ANGELES CA 90014

Law offices of Eduardo L Eninas & AssocEncinas, Eduardo Lahia701 Atlant Blvd sute 309Monterey ark CA 91754IN THE MTTER OFPEREZ HERNANDEZ, SMUEL FILE A 200-155042

UNABLE TO ORWARD NO ADDRES PROVIDED

DATE Oct 24, 2014

 ATTACHED I A COPY O THE DECIION OF THE IMMIGATION JUDGE THIS DECIION

I INAL UNLES AN APAL IS ILED WITH THE BOARD OF IIGRATION APPEALS WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAY O THE DATE OF THE ILING O THIS WRITTEN DECIIONEE THE ENCLOED FOM AND INTRUCTION OR ROPR REARING YOUR AEL.YOUR NOTICE O APEAL, ATTACHED DOCUMENTS, AND FEE OR FEE WAIVER REQUESTMUT BE MILED TO: BOARD O IMMIGTION APEALSOFICE O THE CLERK5107 Leesburg Pike, ite 2000FALS CHURCH, VA 20530 ATTACHED IS A CO OF THE DECIION O THE IMMIGTION JUDGE AS THE RESULTO OUR AILURE TO APEAR AT YOUR SCHEDULED DEPORTATION OR REMOVAL HEARING.THIS DEIION I INAL UNLES A MOTION TO REOPEN I ILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 242B(c} (3) OF THE IMMIGRTION AND NATIONALITY ACT 8 U.SC.ECTION 1252B{) {3) IN DEORTATION ROCEEDING OR ECTION 240{} {6,8 US.C. ECTION 1229ac} (6 IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS IF YOU FILE A MOTIONTO REOPEN, YOUR MOTION MUST BE ILED WITH THIS COURT

IMMIGTION COURT606 SOUTH OLIVE T.LOS ANGELES, CA 90014OTHER

CC THOMKIN, CAROLYN, ESQ606 OLIVE ST, 8TH LOORLO ANGELE CA, 9004

COURTQAIIGRTION COURT F

 

 

  

8/18/2019 Samuel Perez Hernandez, A200 155 042 (BIA April 4, 2016)

4/7

'_

UITE TTE ETET O UTIEEXUTIVE OIE O IIGTIO EVIEW

IGIO OUTLO GELE LOI

File No A 20155 42

n he Mer o:

z z

Responden

)))))))

I EOVL OEEIG

GE Secion 212(a6)(A)(i) of e mmiraion d Natonay Act (A)(2012) -presnt without admissio or parole

ITIO Moio o ReopenO BEL O EOEdurdo ncn, squireaw Center uidin J701 Sou Atantc ouevd,

7f�,

Monterey Pk, Caa 91754 1\i.

O BEL O GOVETsssnt hef ounelS Depmen of Homelnd Sety

6 Sou ive See th Fooros Anees, ala 90014

EIIO OE O TE IIGIO GE

I

Respondent s a natve and cten of Mexco n Janu 18 2012, e oveen personally seved Responden wth a Noice to Appe (NA) See xh 1 he NA, eoveen alege at Responden entere he nied Stes wou admsson or pole d Accordiny, the oveen ched Responden wh inamssbiity pursu to secon212(a)(6)(A)() of e A d Jsicio vested ad remova proceedins ommened uponn of he NA wth e o n J 2, 202 See 8 FR § 100314(a) (2012)

n Febru 7 201, a Noce of Hearn (NH) scheduling Responden's hearg onFebrary 22, 201 at 9:00 am., was sen by reur m o Respoens last o address,hich he provded a the te he wa personay serve with he N A

n Febrary 22, 201, Respondent ed o appear n Court r hs shedued hear.corn e o orereR�spfµen reove in absenta se on e ocuenevence sbme by e ovehh estlhed, by le, convinn, unequivocaevdence, he trth of the tual aens n the N A Accordinly, the ou oreredResponen removed o Mexico

8/18/2019 Samuel Perez Hernandez, A200 155 042 (BIA April 4, 2016)

5/7

_.· J : . - •

On Mc 13, 2013, Respodent led the pending motion to reopen, lleging tt hisbsence ws e reslt of telepone cl om the Co ncelling s Febr 22, 013eing To dte, te Goeent hs not led n opposition to s moton

For te llowing resons, heor EE Respondent's motion to reopen..� ; l, : -tLaw ad Analsis

. Notce

Te Co my reopen d resind in absentia remol order pon motion led ty tme if te respondent demonstes t he dd not receie proper notie. A§ 40(b)(5)(C)(ii) CF.R § 1003.3b)()(iii)(A)() (013). Te NTA nd NOH e properlyseed if tey e personly seed pon the respondent or, if personl servie is not prtble,miled to e respondent or to te respondents consel of reord. ee IA § 39()(). Te

 NT A must expl t te respondent is reqied to immedtely proide e Cou iten record of y cnge to is �dres r telepone nmber. I § 239()()(F). Once te NTA hs been properl seed, serice of te NOH is deemed scient if miled to he most reent dess proided b te respondent A § 20b)(5)(); Mer of G-Y-R-, 23 I&N Dec11, 185 (BIA 2001)

In ts cse, Respondent ws personlly seed wt e NT. He ws ten seed b regul mil wit NOH sedling is rst co ppece r Febr 2, 013 In ismotion, Respondent dmits receipt of te NOH indicting the Febr 2, 2013 o dte.Respt Mot. t 3. Bed on ths

8/18/2019 Samuel Perez Hernandez, A200 155 042 (BIA April 4, 2016)

6/7

·-

50 U.S. 139,12-5 (1981). Hoeve,een i te esponden c demoneprimafacieelgbl, e Co ay deny e moon o eopen n e execse o dceon S v. RoPned 471 U.S. 44,9 (198$); �e o Rees 18 I&N Dec. 249,252 (BIA 1982).

. , ·-; 1"

Because moons o eope eieed wou e ctual eng,c alleged naccompying davs e egded a e unless "ineenly unbelevable. Bn v.Goales,423 F.3d 977, 987 (9 C. 2005), Lmsco v. U.S. I.N.S.,951 F.2d 210,213 (9 C.1991 ). In s case, te cs alleged n e ced adavs ae ineenly unbelevable.In a so adavi,Responden's counsel alleges a on Januay 25, 2013 a appoxmaely12:5 p.m., counsel eceved elepone call om Judge Taveo's la clek ccellg eFebuy 22, 2013 earg. Resp Cousel's A. a 1. e clek allegedly old Responden'scounsel tha a esceduled dae .� eang ould be sen va egula mal o s oce Id.s soy poblemac seeal ons.

Fis,accoding o 8 C.F R. § 1003.18, e Cour s equied,and s Co's pacice, o povde esponden w ien noice o any cge o couoom o eing dae.I s eee unusual a y cour pesonnel ould communicae i Respondens counsel eleponcally o cge s Febuay 22,2013 eng dae alleged. To dae,Responden asno povided e Cou wt any evdence o a lloup mailng a e alleged clek pomsed o send e puose o escedulng.

Second, te case as asgned va NOH (ic Respoden's counel eceved) oCouoom 17 V,ncag a placed on docke o Judge o Bass,o pesdes n

 t couoom. Wi s n md,s lkly a anyone om Judge Trveo's oce ould ave eason o communcae t Responden,le alone possess e eng deails oResponden's case

d, e case poceeded in absentia on e dae d ime and n e couoom sgnedon e NOH. Pesumably,i e Cou ad made suc a elepone call as Responden alleges,ould no ave eld e eing accodng e ogna NOH.Lly, e Co declie\{    se s discon based on e sen o Responden's

primaacie claim f elie in e n o nal. · o-Peda, 471 .S. a 49. Respondenasse a is glend, Paola Elzabe Osuna-Floes,ll be a benecay o e moe'sLPR s d n , e ll bene om is eventual miage o t glend. Hoeve,

 e Cou does no no ete e maiage ill occu. Reponden's clam ae speculavea s me d u do no constue aprimafacie case ele.

n conclusion,due o e ccumsances suoundng e elepone call and counsels lacko suppong evdence a e elepone call occed,suc a e name o e cle o placed e aleged cal o a ecod a uch a cl a eceved o ohe veable deas o econveson, te Cour does no eel Responen me te h bar sua sponte eopeng.Me o J-J, 21 I&N Dec. 976 at 98: .

,I •

 Accodingly, e llong ode ll be eneed:

:t -'·

 

 

  

8/18/2019 Samuel Perez Hernandez, A200 155 042 (BIA April 4, 2016)

7/7

.

'· '

\i:8}·ODER

IT  IS HR E B Y OR DEED a  t  es po nde n t's mo tio n  to reo pe n be DEN IED.

DA T E: _  f   . 4  _  ,p  . _    y    

·.:t�

CEIFAT O S

IS DOCUMNT� S SERV BY . \ ·� ML ( [ PRN V .: [ ] A ] ALIEN c o Cu s  i Or  �\/REP t'HsO A  1: BY : COUR  T SA  \  � 1 . chmen l3 [ 1 J-28' { } Lga! of is t tr

. •,

�I-Lori R . Bass  '  Immigration Judge