8/12/2019 Lorenzo Perez Flores, A095 419 451 (BIA July 28, 2014)

1/5

Grant, She eyBagia Assoc ates PCBou se Bldg S ite 9

. I depen e ce Ma EastPhi a el h a PA 9

Name: P REZ FLOR S OREN O

Depa men of J s e

Executive O ce r Immig ation Review

B Imm g A lO C k

5 /07 Leesburg Pike, Su te 2000Fal Ch rch Vrg n 20530

HS T /Yo k Co. Pr son R4 Concord Roa

Yo k A 74

A 9 -4 9

Date of this notice 7 / 8/ 4

nclosed is a copy of the Boa d's decision and o der in the above- e erenced case.

nc os e

P M :G Edw R

Si cerel ,

Don a Car

Chief C e k

k

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Lorenzo Perez Flores, A095 419 451 (BIA July 28, 2014)

8/12/2019 Lorenzo Perez Flores, A095 419 451 (BIA July 28, 2014)

2/5

U.S De a tment of Jus ce Decis o f e Bo rd of g a o Appe lsExecut ve Of ce Imgrat on Review

F lls C ch V 5

F le: A095 4 451- York PA

re: LO ENZO PERZ F O S a k a. Lore o Perez Flores

RMOV P OCEED GS

P AL

ON B OF RSPO T: S e ey G Esqu re

ON BEH F OF DHS: on D p es A si t Chief Co e

P ICAT ON em d

Da e

f J L 2 8 0 14

e Dep en o ome d Sec ty ("D S ) ppeal om e dec s on o he ation Judge dat Apr l 26 2 3, e a g emoval procee ing T e HS g es

at e m ation udge e ed n concl di g at e respon en , a at ve d c i e of Mexico d a aw l pe e t resi ent of he U i e Sta es s o subject o emoval asch ged We w l i m e appeal

We ev ew m o Ju ge ' nd ng of c r e e or, bu q e ons of law,d s re o ud en , d all o er sue appe s, e ovo 8 C F. 0 3 (d)(3)

e DHS g es e is ub ect o e ov a ch ge u d e prov sion of sec on237(a)(2)(B)(i) o e a on d Na o i y c , 8 S C 1227(a)( )( )( ) a a resuof s onvic o on Ju e , 2012, n e ontgom y Coun y Co of Commo P ea r eo ense of se or Po es o of D g P a e l ai v ola o of tle 35, ec o 7801 3 a)3 , of e Pe sylv a Conso a ed a u e {T e Con ol ed S s ce, D g Device

d Co me c ct)

We ave held t o prove a c ge der ec o 237(a)(2) B)(i) of e Ac , e D S ee ur en of prov ng a e respo dent onv c on oes o ll w n e "po ses io r

per onal u e except onSee Mat er ofM ncad24 I&N Dec. 62, 67 n 5 ( 20 7) s elle abl s ed at e mi a o udge l ed o ex ng e s a to e ents of ec min code, e c g docume ju y s ct on wr t en plea a eemen , p ea co oquy

sc p d y exp ic t c u ndi gs o e al cou o ch e defend t ass ted oother e ado ted.See Shepardv. Uni ed S a es,4 U.S 13 26 (2005).

We ee w e mi at on dge t e c a a o e v ous o de ofad udi a o etf h e c ge e mpo o o p s e , but o o es is p eci o e e o d g volve n e re on en s o e seSee x 2 Tab C No pleacol oq y sc pt o o e judicia ly no cea le docume t e r be e t e o sub t ce nor

he ount o at s s ce. A o he S gue a po ice comp nt e a av

The m a o J dge inco o a ed by e re ce e er e s on da ed p l 2, 20 3Cite as: Lorenzo Perez Flores A095 419 451 (BIA July 28 2014)

8/12/2019 Lorenzo Perez Flores, A095 419 451 (BIA July 28, 2014)

3/5

A095 419 45

of probable ca e nd cate that a " -g e cont n ng a subst ce eld tested as coc ne wasund in the res ondent's po session e espondent s guil y plea does not re r to oseocuments he DHS contends at the ag e containing wh te powder w sent to a lab r

test ng. On Apr l 2 3, the D S submit e e lab r or con ing hat t e subst ce w scoc ne owever we a ee wi the mi ation Judge at t e lab repor was not p t of heconvicti n record relied upon y e c imina co According y we af he at on

udge s conc usion at t e S ad not met its b rden o esta ishing at he respon en was removable s ch ged Ma er oDav , 26 &NDec. 37 4 (BIA 2012).

Acco ding y t e lowing order wi l be entered

OR ER: The appeal is dism ssed.

2Cite as: Lorenzo Perez Flores, A095 419 451 (BIA July 28, 2014)

8/12/2019 Lorenzo Perez Flores, A095 419 451 (BIA July 28, 2014)

4/5

,UNI EDSTA S EP RTMEN OF S IC

EXEC IVE 0 CE I G A IO IEWI ED S A ES I IG O C

Y K, PEN SY V IA

I HE A E F:PE EZ O ES orenzo

espondent

) E O L P CEE I GS)) F le# 095-4 9-45))

n Behalf ofRespondent: An ny Mat an Esq

Ground o emova A 237(a)(2)(B)( )

Appl cationTerm nati n by Resp ndent

O Beha f f HSJ n Staples Assist Chief C nsel

Ru g o G o d of Remov a d O de

On Apri 2 20 3 this c u terminated the em al pr ceedings against resp nden that t e g e en i ed t meet its burden f f t at r sp nden s r g parapc nvi ti n der 35 Pa C.S 780-1 3(a)(32) was n t a ense i v ing ssessiuse f 30 grams r less f m ijuana per A 237(a)(2)(B)(i) Subse ue tl ri

he c t ssue a stay t a e mina i n rder w le the c sidere new evy g ve en c unse a lab ra rep rt revealing t a he c lled subs ance c s

resp ndent was c aine

it Apri 2 20 3 written interim r l ng the c urt nd t e c nvict n rec rd a a matter f law r the g ver ent t mee i s burden f pr f by c ea a d vi cing that resp nden was re ab e un er INA 237(a)(2)(B)(i) In tn e 2 it was n ted th ugh t e p li e cri nal c mpla n had n ted t at t e c n r lled su sta ce w se t t a

r anal sis it a un wn whe her a lab rat ana ysis was c nd c ed As te term nati n g ve ent c unse tai ed a c p f e lab ra ry rep indicat n

u stanc t en resp ndent was c caine G e ent c un el thus asks the c u t n

t at t e gr und f rem val at NA 237(a)(2)(B)(i) t be sustained A er rt er c ns derati n t e ab rep rt wil n t be c nsidered as a part the c

1As a general pro osit on, a ar y proceeds at ome er l by awa t g u t the court ha srul ng n a ca e be re seek g ad t o al ev e ce. Here, the lab repor was not eve o ght b tht e o had termi ted t e proceed gs Notw t sta d ng, t e a repo t a bee ap ended to thecon dered

8/12/2019 Lorenzo Perez Flores, A095 419 451 (BIA July 28, 2014)

5/5

/recor wh ch th s court c u e to de ermine whether he gove ent as met its urden of

n an unpubl she Secon rcu t op n on,Sc le v U SD t ofHom l d S c ,31 F Appx 285( ir 9), he cou ulted he Board r cons dering he ug lab re ort on e coc

om the alien at the t e o h s arres . The court un the ab report as not wi hin that documents constit ting the of c al conv c on recordId. a 87 The cou easone at the reco

evidence d d no esta l sh that he al en leade guil y based on e la re o , angove en 's b den o proof perm ts only hat ev ence to which the a en necessarily gu lty.I

The present la repor was a luded o n the police crim nal compla nt,2 which is not theaccusato ns ment; an In at on was ed by the State,exh b t2-C and i s to this documenwh ch responden entered is guilty plea The n rma on revea s at o t that a base ed om respondent, d he was ch rged under 35 Pa S 78 - 3 a) 32) s scase, the n rmat on s silen as to y p icu ar controlled substa ce Whi e e la precedes respondent's gui y plea, h s record is si ent as o whether respondent leaded coca ne paraphe a a, or generica ly o rug p raphe a a without any e renceac owledgment o , coca ne or any other dr g

Conclusion

This record does not esta sh, by cle and convinc ng evidence 24 (c)(3)( )res onden plea ed g ilty to cocaine paraphe al aMa e ofDav y, 2 &NDec 37, 4 (B

1 ), that b rden, when t comes to A 237(a)( )(B)( ) nc des re u ing he gov prove tha respon en s ug convic on oes no ll w h n he " ossess on r pexcept on under I A 37(a)( )(B)( ) he Boar he d ha such nqu ry permits a "cirs eci c ap roach

However, such modi e categor cal approach s res r cted to those documen s h c the ex ent tha respondent was actua y convicted. vanson v.A 'y G n., upra,a 93 94 In h scase, absent evidence to the contrary, at singul doc men s the Information, wh ch, as we

s si ent as to any pa cu a con rolled su stance. " e may not open ou revie to other rinquire into the c ua basis r the der y ng convic on. " Id at 29 The co r here yinco ora es by e rence 's orig nal Ap , 3, o er ermina ng proceedings

Or er: The ground of remova purs a t to A 24 ( )(3) s dismissed, a d ese proceediagain erm nated

April 26, 013

Apo ce crim nal com nt may be he cha gi g documen n Pe sy van a. Garc a vt y Gen., 462F 3 287, 292 (3 C r 2006) However w en an In a o s f ed n a c na case t s t e cha gi gdoc en Evanson vA y Gen 550 F 3 284 292-293(3rd.C 2008)