Eden Francois, A075 442 065 (BIA June 6, 2013)

7/28/2019 Eden Francois, A075 442 065 (BIA June 6, 2013)

1/6

Scarlatell, Donna, Esq.Law Oce777 S Palm Avenue, Suie 5Sarasoa F 342360000

Name: FANCOIS DN

US. Depatment of Justice

xecue Oce aon eew

Board ofImmigation AppealsOce of he Clerk

57 Lsburg Pike, Sut Fals Church Vrgna

HS/ICE Oce of Chief Counse - ORL355 Lawton Rad Sute 10Orlando 32803

A 0754265

Dae of his noce: 6/6/203

ncloed a cop o e oad decon and ode n e aboe-eenced cae

oe

Pane embers:Gudg, JohHof, hodki-Bch h K

Snceel

DO CtVDonna a

e ek

Lsges

Useteam ock

Cite as: Eden Francois, A075 442 065 (BIA June 6, 2013)


2/6

U:. Dptmnt of JustcExecutive Ofce r Immigaton Revew

Decson ofthe Boad ofaton Appeals

Fas Chuch, Virgna 2201File: A075 065 - Olando, FL

n e: DN ANOIS

OVAL PODINS

APPAL

Date:

ON AL OF SPONDNT Doa Scalaelli qie

APPLIATIO eopenin

JUN 6 21

e epondent, a naie and ciizen o aii wa odeed emoed in abentia on ebua 009 On oembe 8, 0 e eponden ed a otion o eopen poceedin wic eImiation Jde denied on Noebe 30 0 e epondent led a ime appea o adeciion e appea will be ained, poceedin will be eopened and e ecod will beemanded

Te Iiaion Jde denied e epondent oion o eopen ndin at eeponden eceied pope noice i ean to notice to i e conel owee,we nd tat in iew o e cicmance peened in i cae incdin e declaation b eepondent me conel in wic e conceded that e did not inm e eponden o eFeba 4 009 ean and a c poided ineectie aiance o e eponden, we wi

allow te epondent anote opponi o appea a heain In eacin i conclion, wenoe tat on appea e epondent a peened eidence o btantia copiance wi ecieia e t in Matr of Lozada, 9 N Dec 637 (A 988), a' 857 Fd 0 ( t i988)

OD: e appeal i tained, poceedin ae eopened and e ecod i eanded oe Iiation Jde e poceedin

Cite as: Eden Francois, A075 442 065 (BIA June 6, 2013)


3/6

TE A TER OF

EDEN FRANOIS

ESPODENT

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JSTICE

EXEUTIV OFFIE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEWUS IMMIGRTION OURT

3535 Lawton Road Suite 20Orando orida 32803

CASE NO

A75 442 065

REOVAL POCEEDGS

ON BEALF O ESPODENT Donna Scaratei Esq

DECSO O A MOTO

A otion to Reopen In Absentia Order o Remova has been le n the above aptonease The oton has been uy consee an t appeas to the Cout that

[X} The oton has been uy onsee an t appears to the Cou that no

substantal gouns have been avane to warant that t be gante Theee,

IT IS HEREBY ODERED that the oton be an the same s heeby

DEED

[X} See attahe

Appea ESERVE by Responent

'DANEL LIPPMANmmigration Judge

Date Sgne NOV 3 0


4/6

0.:;On Fbruary 2009 hs Court ntrd an absta ordr of rmoval agast

Rsponnt. On Novmbr 202 Rsponnt ld th stan moto to rop. hDpartmn o Homan Scurty has not submttd a rspons

Rsponnt conds tha th orr o rmoval shoul b ropn bcas h d not

rcv notc of h schdud haring. Th Cour ha rvw th Dga Auo Rcorng.Th rcord rcts that otc was snt to Rspodnts r cous Mcha A. Hson thata mastr calndar harng woul b h on uy 3 200 Dig that harng . Hansonappar but Rspondnt as absnt. Mr Hason ncat that Rspont was not notddu to a clrca rror n Mr ansons oc. At that tm th Cour dd not procd n absntaand schduld an ndvdal haring r Fbruary 2009 at 3 pm. h procdgs rsumd onbruy 2009 but nthr Rsponnt nor rmr cos was prst an th Cour tran absna orr o rmova Notc to rmr couns constus notc to Rspondnt. Seescon 20b)5)A) o h Act CF.R. 26c)2) ee alo ater of Baroco 9 &N c.255 BA 95) hodng tha oc o an als cousl costuts notc to th an) CF.R. 292a).

Rspondnt contds that h Court rrd rlyng upon Mr. anso to notRspon of h Fbruary 2009 haring snc Mr. Hanson ackowlg hat h d tono Rspondnt of h ly 3 200 harg. Rsponnts cotnon s wthot mrt.Durg uly 3 200 harng Cosl bl a clrical rror hs oc and ths Court hado owldg of any prvous pat by Mr anso of lng to not clnts nddRspondt an Mr. anson had appard br a prvous mmgrato udg on Octobr 2007. h Cour s not gong to dsrgard a cs aoys rprstaton o a party basdupo o clrca rror

Absnt a showng o nadqat noc a moon to ropn an n absna orr o

rmova must b l wth 0 days th an monstrats xcptonal crcumsancs ee C.FR. 003.23(b)()(). See Reo F3 273 27 ( l Cr.999) (nng thatth 0day statt o lmtaons prov n scon 20(b))(c)() of th mmgraton andNatonalty Act U.S.C. 229a{b)5)c)() s jurscoal an madao) Rsponntsmoto s ovr 3Y yars untmly

Rspond contds ht t 0 day tm lm s sbc o quab tong basd uponsubsqunt Evnh Crcut cas law ha has qustond past prcn. See RuzTurco t Ge _F.3d W 50099 (l Cr. Nov. 202). Howvr Reo has obn ovrud an rmans bnng prcdnt. Morovr vn assumg quabl tollngapps Rsponn has no stablshd that h quas. n Rah v. Mue 533 F.3 27

30 3 2 Cr. 200) th Scond Crcut st rh stablshd law rgardng qutab olng

Equab ong s avaab ony h a satss a twoartst Frs th an must show that hs or hr counssprrmanc was so nctv . [ha ] mpng uon thundamta ss o h harng voato of th hamndmn du procss caus. Rabu INS, F.3d 79 22d Cr.99 caton an nta quotaon marks omd ee

2


5/6

Ialso Cekic v. INS, 435 F3d 167 170 (2d C.2006); Iavorski vINS 232 F.3d 124 135 (2d C2000) o meet ths standad theaen must allege ts suent to show [ (a) that ompetentounsel would have ated otherwse and [ (b) that he waspejuded by hs ounses peane. Rabiu 41 F.3d at 882

(ntea quotaton maks omtted); Cekic 435 F.3d at 171.Seond "the alen must demonstate . that [he has exesed duedlgene pusung [hs am Iavorski 232 F.3d at 135;Cekic 435 F3d at 171; Jian Hua Wang v BIA 508 F.3d 710ee the ae "beas] the buden of povng that he] w[as] nt dlgent. Cekic, 435 F3d at 171. "[Both pongs of [theeutable tollg] test mut be met. Id at 170 "Thus, no matterhow egregiously ineffectve counsel's assistance may have been,an alien will not be enttled to equitabe tolling unless he canafrmatvely demonstrate that he exercised reasonable duedlgence n pursuing his claim. (emphass added)

espondent has not submtted a adavt n suppo of the nstant moton See 8 CF10023.2(b)(3). Satements ade by ounse a moton ae not evdene ad ae thus otenttled to any evdentay weght. See INS v Phinpathya 464 US. 183 18889 n6 (1984 );Matter of SM 22 l&N De 49 51 (BIA 1998); Matter of Ramirez-Sanchez 17 l&N De. 503(BIA 1980). espondent wated ove 3Y yeas to le hs ntmely moton. heee n theasene of a detaled adavt om espondent as to the umstanes ad why he wated soong he has ot estashed the due dlgene equement equtable tollng n Valenci vHolder 657 F3d 745 748 -749 (8th 201) the ou stated

When the moton to eopen s baed on neetve asstae of

ounse howeve "equtable tollng s spangy nvoked. Pafe vHolde, 615 F.3d 967 969 (8th C. 2010) (qotaton omted) t"s not avalabe to those who sleep on the ghts Habchy vGonzales, 471 F.3d 858 866 (8th C 2006). he movant mustnot ony show that she meets the Lozada equeents bt mustalso estabsh that she exesed due dlgene See Pafe, 615 F dat 969 (dsussng tolng n otext f statutoy deade motons to eope based on in absentia emoval odes). We havend tong nappopate whee the movant dd not le themoton to eopen pomptly ae dsoveng me ounsel'sneetveness See id at 96970.

hs ou wl not eopen sua sponte pusuant to 8 C.F 1003.23(b) "As a geneaue e voke ou sua spote authoty spagy teatng t not as a geea eedy ayhadshps eated b enemet of the tme and numbe lmts n the motons eguatons butas a extaodnay emedy eseed tuy exceptoa stuatons See Matter of G-D- 22& De 1132 (BA 1999) see also Matter of J-J- 21 I& De 976 (BA 1997)("the powe toeopen on our ow oto s not meat to be used as a genea ue ng defets o othese umvent the eguatons whee eng them mght esult n hadshp). As

3


6/6

.. . l '

' J 0idicated, espdet as t sbitted a detailed adavit, ad he has t established a trexceptia sitati de t te ct tat e waited ears ad dd t e te tio i a tieaer

espodet coteds that the prceedigs shold be repeed becase his dagterbecae a nited States citize and led a visa petitio r h wich was approved b theSCS, ad e can ow app r adjstet of stats. I a deportatio case, the Bard dthat an aie is ot reqired to rescid is deprtatio order der sectio 242 of te Act if e isprsig a appicati r ew reief, ad prvided tere is o evidece tat te respdetreceived te reqired waigs der secti 242B(e) of the Act ee Matter ofM-- 22 l&NDec 49 (BA 1998) Secti 240(b )(7) of te Act sets rt a siilar liitatio discretia reief r ilig t appear at a reva hearg a llows:

A aie aaist w a a de o reva is etered iabsetia der this sbsectio ad w at te tie f te oticedescibed i paragrap ( l ) (2) of sectio 29(a) was prvidedora tice eiter i te aie's ative lagage r antherlagage the aie derstands of te tie ad place f tepceedigs ad o te cseqeces der this paragrap iig, ther tha becase of exceptioal circstaces (asdeed i sbsecti (e)()) t atted a proceedig der tissectio, sa ot be eigible r reief der section 240A, 240,24, 248, or 249 r a period of 10 ears aer the date of the etrf te a order reva

ere, espodet was persoall ired b a previos igrati dge Octber1, 2007, of te cseqeces a ire t appear as provided secti 240(b)() o te Act

4

Eden Francois, A075 442 065 (BIA June 6, 2013)

Documents

Transcript of Eden Francois, A075 442 065 (BIA June 6, 2013)