Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
-
Upload
immigrant-refugee-appellate-center-llc -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
-
8/13/2019 Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
1/8
Guerra, Raul F, Esq.Monzon Law, PC, LLO650 "J" STREET SUITE 401Lincoln NE 68508
Name: CORTES DURAN CHRISTIAN
US epartmet ustice
Execuive Oce r Immigation Review
Board ofImmigration ppealsOce of the Clerk
5107 Leburg Pike Suite 000Fals Chrch Vin 04
HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel - OMA1717 Avenue HOmaha, NE 6811O
A096-587962
Date of this notice 1/31012
Enclosed is a copy of he Boad's decisio ad ode i he above-erenced case.
Eclosure
Pael Membes:Gedelsbee, JohMaphs, a DPaey oe
Sceely
Doa CaChef Cek
Cite as: Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
-
8/13/2019 Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
2/8
U.S e of usticeExecuv Oce r Imigaton Reew
Decso of the Board of maton Appeals
Fas Chuh, irginia 22041
Fe A096 587 962 Omaa NE
n e CHSTN COTES UN
EMOVAL ROCEEIS
AEAL
ON BEHALF OF RESONENT a F ea Esqe
ON BEHALF OF HS Cee Samsonsssant Ce Conse
CHE
ate
JAN 8120
Noce Sec 237(a)(2)(A)() &N Ac [8 SC 122(a)(2)(A)()] Convcted o aavated ony
ALICATION Temnaton
Te espondent a natve and ctzen o Meco appeas om te Immaton desSeptembe 27 2011 decson c ncopoates s Sepembe 14 2011 decson ssann te
cae o emovaby nde secon 237(a)(2)(A)() o e Imaton and Natonay Act8 SC 1227(a)(2)(A)() and denyn e espondents moton o emnae te emoapoceedns Te appea be dsmssed
We eve e ndns o c ncdn e detemnaton o cedby made by ematon de nde a "ceay eoneos sandad 8 CF 1003 (d)(3)() We eve aote sses ncdn ete e pes ave met e eevant bden o poo and sses odsceon nde a de novo standad 8 CF 003 (d)(3)(); Mae of-S-B-, 24 I&Nec 493 (BIA 2008)
We concde a e epamen o Homeand Secy ("S) met s bden by cea and
convncn evdence o pove at e esponden as been convced o an aavaed ony asdened n secton 10 (a)(43)(T) o e Act 8 USC. 1 (a)(43)(T) e "e to appea beea co psnt o a co ode o se o o dspose o a e o a ony c a senenceo 2 yeas mpsonment o moe may be mposed Ts e Immaton de commted noeo by sstann te soe cae o emovaby
n 2010 te esponden as convcted o voatn secon 29908 o te Nebasa evsedSattes c saes a "oeve s caed a ony ad s eeased om cstody deba ecozce o a condtoned eese and y s to appea bee e cot antnsc eease en eay eqed o to sende mse tn ee days eeae sa be ty
Cite as: Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
-
8/13/2019 Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
3/8
A096 587 962,
of a Css IV lony . . We agree wth he Immigration Judges deternation that a convictonunder section 29-908 does not quai categoricay s an agavated ony, as the required eementsto be convicted under the state are broader than hose required under section 10(a)(43)() of thect (IJ at 3) Tung to e modied categocal approach, however, we conclude that therespondent's conviction under section 29908 quies as an aggravated ony
The respondent does not ispute that his conviction under secton 29908 was a conviction r"ure to appear ere a cour, n that his appearancews required in order "to nswer to ordispose of a feony r which a sentence of 2 years imprsonent or more may be impose Therespondent's soe dispute s that his volation of secton 29-908 does not consttute an agavatedony because his obigation to appea was not "pursuant to a cour order We disagree
The documens tited "Joa Ent d Order, whch were signed by a judge, indicate hat abai bond was set in the respondent's case, he posted and was reeed on bond, and he thensubsequenty rfeited his ond by faing to appear at a hearing t was this ilure to appea that
served he basis r the respondent's conviction under section 29908 of the Nebraska RevsedStatutes s noted by the Iigraton Judge, secton 29-506 of he ebrasa Revsed Stautes sttesthat if an oense is baiabe, "the accused may be reeased pursuant to Chapter 29, artice 9, suchrelease to be condtoned on his appearance bere the dsrict couras ordered" (Emphass added);see also B V. S 2990102 (requirng a judge authorizing a dendnt's reease undersection 29-901 to issue a witen order containing a statement of the condition or conditionsmposed); NB V S 2990 (a judge orderng a balale defendant's reease sha imposeconditions to reaonaby assure the dendant's appearance) Thus, n Neraka, implct n a reeaseon bond s an order conditioning the accuseds appearance bere the cour s such, it llows thatone who s to appear aer having been reeased on bai has necessariy iled to appear n vioatonof a cour order reeasng him on bai
We are neither persuaded nor bound by the respondent's reiance on decisons by the UnitedStates Cour of ppeas r the inth Crcuit and the nited States Dsrct Cour r the Dsrict ofConnecticut The respondent cites Renteria-Morales v. Muksey, 551F3d 1076 (9h Cr 2008),n which the cour, tng to the modied categorca approach, concluded that the aien'sconvicton r ilure to appear, i.e, ba umping, under 18 U .S.C 3146 did not constute anaggravated ony uner secton 0(a)(43)() of the ct mong other reaons to reach itsconclusion, the cour stated that the udicay noticeable documents presented by the goeentdid not esabish that the aien was under a "cou order, as the charging document ony alleged thatthe aien ed to appear "a directed, wthout ny menton of a cour order Id. at 085
Nor are we persuaded by he respondent's reiance on an unpuished oard decision,Mtter ofGuo Hua Zhao 046 4 0 906, 008 WL 44669 ( ug 6, 008 unpushed), whc aosen the jurisdcton of the in Circuit n that decson, the oard conclued that the aensudgment of convction did not estbish that he peaded guiy to a, or any, of the ctuaaegations in he ndictment charging hi with ing to appear, as woud quai as an aggravatedony under section 101(a)(43)(T) of the ct, because he udgent id not conain the critcalphase "as charge n the Indicent, and thus he indictment could not be ooked at nder hemode categoca approach pursuant to nth Crcut precedent
2
Cite as: Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
-
8/13/2019 Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
4/8
06 6.
e responen aso cies Baaby v Reno 142 Supp d 27 7 (ED Con 2001), in wiche dera disic cou, also ing o he moie caegorica approac, concude ha he aliensiure o appear convicion, C GEN. S 53a172, r willy iling o appear wenlegy calle i no uali as e ega equivaen o iure o appear pursuan o a cour oreruder secion 10l (a)(43)() o e c e cour reasone a here was no language in eappearanc bond a could be consued as a cour orer, and a a bond appearance rmin Coecicu, i signed, consiues merey a promise o appear a various ies an recognizescerain consequences in he iure o o so Id a 2720
Unike in Renteraora/es an Barnaby were e cours sae ha ere was no inicaiona e aiens were uner a cour orer o appear, he ebraska Revised Saues, as expaineabove, make cear ha ayone reease on bon is release pursuan o a wren orer by a ugeconining he condiios o suc release us, unlike i he cases cie by e responden, eevience in is maer does inicae ha e responen was uner a cour orer coniioning isreease on is appearance a a earing a e DHS id no presen is orer as evienc is o no
consequence, as e orer was iplici in e responens reease on bail 2
ccoringly, we arm e mmigraion uges enia o e responens moion o erminaee remova proceeigs as e DHS me is burden by clear and convincing evidence o prove ae responen is reovable an aggravae on uner secio 37(a)()()(iii) o e c s eresponden oes no appea e miaion udges nding a e i no seek y r o relieom remova, we eem e issue as waive on appea, an e owing order w be nere
ORDER: e appea is ismisse
OR E ORD
In Reneraoraes e Nin ircui sa a i a b rsonal o inr o linsconvicion a e was uner a cou orer o appar because, as assere by e goveen, onya uicia ocer as e auoriy o irec an accuse release on bai o appear, an a suc arecive o apper woud be a cour orer Rentera-ora/es v uksey supra a 05 Te courowever, di no reac is issue, reasonig a, on is ce, e evience esabised neier ahe aien was uner a cour orer nor a was ordered o appar o answer or dispose o acg d
3
Cite as: Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
-
8/13/2019 Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
5/8
U.S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IIGRATION REVIEWIIGTION CORT
Omaha Nebraska
File A 6 8 6 Date: September
In the Matte of
CHRISTIAN CORTES DU IN RMOVA ROCEEDINGS
Respondent
CGE
ALICATION
ACES
Section 3{a) () (A) {i) of the Immgration
and Nationalty Act - any alen who s
convcted of an aggravated felony as defined
in Section (a) (43) {) of the Act a lawrelating to a failure to appear before a Courtpursuant to a court order to answer or dsputea charge of a felony for which a sentence of
two years mprsonment may be mposed at any
tme after admsson
None
ON BELF OF RESPONDNT: ON BHF OF TH DEARTMENTOF HOMEL SCRITY
Raul F. Guerra Esqire6 J Street Ste 4The Mill Town BuildingLincoln NE 688
Debra Robinson EsquireAssistant Chef CounselUS Department o HomelanSecurityImmigration and ustomsEnforcement Avenue H Ste 4Omaha NE 68
-
8/13/2019 Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
6/8
O DECSON O THE TON JE
The Respdet is a -year-ld ative ad citize f
Mexic wh etered the Uited States Jauary 2 with a
B-2 visitr visa See Exhibit 2 at page e The Respdet's
status was adjusted t that a lawful permaet residet May
26 July 2 2 the Departmet f Hmelad Security
cmmeced remval prceedigs agaist the Respdet by persally
servig him with a Ntice t ppear ad chargig him with
remvability as idicated abve See Exhibit
The Respdet deied the charge f remvability ad
filed a Mti t Termiate these prceedigs See Exhibit 3.
The Curt received evidece the issue f remvability ad
issued a rder deyig the Respdets Mti t termiate See
Exhibit
The urt fids that the Respdet is remvable as
charged fr the reass stated i the urts rder dated
September 4 2 See Exhibit The Curt desigates Mexic
as the cutry f remval shuld that be ecessary
t a hearig i this curt the Respdet was ifed
that he culd apply fr ay available frms f relief ad was
give a deadlie t file fr such relief The Respdet appeared
i Curt tday ad stated that he has t filed fr ay frm f
relief ad that he is t seekig ay relief i this Curt
ccrdigly th fllwig rder will be etered:
6 87 62 2 September 27 2
-
8/13/2019 Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
7/8
(
ORDR
I IS RB ORDRD tat te Resodet be eoved to
exco o te cage cotaed te otce to ea
96 587 962
D MOISgato udge
3 Setebe 27, 2011
-
8/13/2019 Christian Cortes Duran, A096 587 962 (BIA Jan. 31, 2012)
8/8
CERTIFICATE PAGE
I hereby certify that the attached proceeding before
DNIEL A. MORIS, in the matter of:
CHRISTIN CORTES DU
A 96 8 962
Omaha Nebraska
was held as herein appears, and that this is the original
transcript thereof for the file of the Executive Office for
mmigration Review.
slf/bjn
Stephanie L. Fink Transcriber
YORK STENORAPHIC SERVICES, INC.
34 North eorge StreetYork, Pennsylvania 40-266() 84-00
November 8 20
mpion ate