Akram MTS-II

8/2/2019 Akram MTS-II

1/23

MANAGEMENT TRAINEESHIP SEGMENT - II

Presented By:

Akramul Hoque (10201002)

Host Organization:- Gramin vikas trust

Faculty guide

Prof. Nandini Sen

Title of the project:-Agricultural inputs & produce market study for the tribal community of

Jhabua & Meghnagar Block of Jhabua District

Study Area:- Jhabua District of MP


2/23

Gramin Vikas Trust (GVT), committed for development of the rural livelihoodswas established by Krishak Bharti Co-operative Limited, with the support fromGovt. of India and Department for International Development (DFID), U.K. Themission of GVT is to act as a catalyst involving and enabling the rural

communities to improve their livelihoods in the resource poor areas.

About Organization

Mission

To act as catalyst to enable the rural poor to improve their livelihoods bysupporting productivity improvement programmes in agriculture and rural and

rural non-farming sectors which :

Are planned, implemented and evaluated jointly with beneficiaries

Discriminate positively in favour of women and other disadvantaged groups

Link effectively with the programmes of other governmental and non-governmental organizations and

Are sustainable in the long run without the intervention of any outside

agency


3/23

VisionTo design and implement rural livelihood programmes in different parts of the country

To develop appropriate participatory gender focused agricultural technologies for rainfed areas

To offer research and consultancy services to government and NGOs and community

based

organizations in the field of participatory technology development, project

management and participatory rural appraisals

Objectives of GVTImprovement of livelihood of tribal and farming community.

Gender and poverty focused participatory approaches and its implementation.

Establishment of village based institutions.

Capacity building of community by setting up training centers.

Consultancy on Rural Development to different organizations/institutions and otherorganizations

Research and other related activities on sustainable agriculture

Sustainable links with government, non-government, Educational and Research

Institution


4/23

ObjectiveThe Objectives of the study are:

To acquaint ourselves with present agricultural scenario

viz. agricultural inputs, agricultural services used at target

villages and average expenditure of the farmer on the same.To estimate the demand for agricultural inputs and other

related services in the target villages.

To assess the market condition of the agriculture inputs and

services.To prepare a producer company model in the target villages.


5/23

Limitations

While conducting this study I faced the some of the limitations whichcould be enumerated below

The total coverage area of the project was very vast and it was not

possible to cover within the stipulated time.

Visiting the area were completely unfamiliar for me, my visit was

confined.

The time period was not sufficient enough for studying the

different.

Poor transportation facility also delayed the data collection.

The major limitations were faced during my field visit, as the factsof ground reality of agri-input concept not properly understand by

the farmer.


6/23

Methodology

Phases

Phase 1

(BackgroundStudy)

Discussion With RPMJabua

Sample DesignQuestionnaire

Development

Phase 2

(Field Work)

Data Collection

Data Analysis

Report Writing


7/23

Sample size

Marginal farmer:

Sample size:-150 farmer


8/23

Data Analysis

17%

67%

16%

House typeconcerate Thatched Mixed

Agriculture

95%

service

4%

business

1%

Primary occupation

agricultural

5%

business

2%livestock

1%

wage labour

83%

other

9%

Secondary occupation

Source: Questionnaire


9/23

79%

21%

Migration

Migrate Not Migrate



10/23

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Open well Bore well Electric pump Diesel pump set

Series1 136 70 118 31

Irrigation Assets



11/23

Wheat

20%

gram10%

soyabean

34%

maize

36%

Cultivable land in Acre



12/23

Seed variety

Breeder seed

12%

T.L

19%

Certified

32%

Foundation

37%

Seed variety

Js9305

64%

js335

32%

JS-9560

4%Soya bean seed variety

HI-141845%

sujata

10%

lok-1

28%

wh147

17%

Wheat variety

59%

41%

Maize variety

JVM-421 HYV



13/23

56%

44%

Sources of power

Tractor Draft of animal

80%

20%

Sources of labour

Family labour our side of family labour



14/23

Production Three different crop last three year:-

0

20000

40000

6000080000

100000

120000

140000

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

Wheat Maize Gram

Production

production



15/23

Comparison of three different crops

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Wheat Maize Gram

sold

own use

production

47%

53%

31%35%

31%

42% 45% 33%47%



16/23

Market Analysis

56%

1%

9%

34%

Purchase seed from different market

Local Market Dealear Co-operative KVK&GVT

local market,

150, 44%

co-operative, 6,

2%

weakly Haat,

150, 43%

Whole sale

market, 39,

11%

Agricultural produce sold at different

markets



17/23

Production per Acre.

Wheat:- 3555/-Soybean:- 3104/-

Gram:- 3388/-

Maize:- 2543/-

Cost of per Acre.

Wheat:- 5.63 QSoybean:-5.05 Q

Gram:- 1.94 Q

Maize:-4.5 Q

Gross Income:-

Wheat:- (5.63 Q*847.25)-3555= 1215/-

Soybean:-(5.05 Q*1891)-3104= 6445/-Gram:-(1.94 Q*2374.44)-3388= 1218/-

Maize:-(4.5 Q*844.5)-2543= 1257/-



18/23

Mode of transport:-

Bullock cart

14%

Tractor

68%

Tempo

18%

Mode of transport



19/23

Existing models of movement of farm produce from farm to

market-

Farmer

Village

Market/

Weekly haat

Wholesaler

Market

Consumer


20/23

Crop Urea(q) DAP(q) Seed(q)

Soyabean 17.64 67.4 76.55

Maize 50.97 60.3 16.53

Gram 8.7 28.55 14.66

Wheat 42.25 48.95 65.9

Total 119.56 3031.65 173.64

Demand analysis for agricultural input:-

Model ofproducer company

http://time%20line.docx/http://time%20line.docx/


21/23

Project Outcomes

Economic ImpactPer hectare production improved by

10% by end of project period

Increase in net return to farmer

(Inflation +10%)

Increase in sub-sector development foragriculture

Reduce gap in availability of inputs by

20-25%

Increased food & nutritional security

Market linkage for the backward and

forward integration will be ensured with

competitive market

Additional employment generated due

to increased intensity of farming

Benchmark minimum wage rate for

labor

Reduction in Migration

Social ImpactSocial capital built in the form of PC

Improve gender relation & decision

making of women farmers in PCgiven

board member positions

Institutional viability

Increased bargaining power for input

purchase and output marketing

Reduce social conflicts and risks and

enhance welfare at household level

Improved food and nutritional value

Leadership role of producers in

technology absorption

Positive health and nutrition impact on

consumers

Environment- carbon credit


22/23

Recommendation

To set up village knowledge centre to assess information need and collection

of indigenous knowledge, which can be synthesized, with information from

experts/ institution.

Agricultural knowhow to provided to farmers in the cultivation of soybean,wheat, gram etc.

Training of farmers on best practical post harvest and agronomic practices.


23/23

Thank You

Akram MTS-II

Documents

Transcript of Akram MTS-II