Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº...

14
20 30 BMI18.51983( 58) 20 14.630 7.82003 15 20 23.430 14.7BMI25.01983( 58) 20 8.7 30 13.5 2003 15 20 8.1 30 12.6 7kg 1 BMI [Body Mass Index(kg)/ (m) 2 ] 18.5 18.5 25.0 25.0 3

Transcript of Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº...

Page 1: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

ê ?�gëìíXî"#ïð3fE�FGH

���?�gëìíXî"#ïð3fEIJñò

���20 4~¡¢ 30 4~���*&EP�s�s� QR@ST>�&BDE

FG�HI�'GBMI�18.5I�JK��1983(@A 58)�� 20 4~�� 14.68�304~�� 7.88�]µ6� �2003G¿� 15I��� 20 4~�� 23.48�30 4~�

� 14.78�LM>�&BîÑ�³´�'�JKGBMIÊ25.0I��1983(@A 58)�� 20 4~�� 8.78�30 4~�� 13.58�2003G¿� 15I��� 20 4~�� 8.18�30 4~�� 12.68��£ê��[\�]&B

�,C��UV���g��GUV��gI���u^­+UV��-./EFLM

� mnZ,R�& �UVæ�EP ÆDEFG�HIÉ�Æ¥q�É�]µ6

����UV��EFLM� 7kg £´��K��DuvEFw#uÎN&hij ª

q�����/O��6/8(���Z,R�&B

��«����UV��EP¡¢UV��EFLM��«µ�uvw�EF¡¢U

V���g��GUV��gI���.��s��Q�u�/O�[\��¤ A+,

&B>6 µ�EFLM� %î¾�²³Z,&���/�«��U¶·¸�EP/

O���>6ä¹#Ø��� F"�]&Bº�67���,+� !#~+­�>6

x��«^}ø/UV[&#óôN&S�q�»¼�>�UVW�*&¥C>�E

FLM�#ײN&�� �7+,�&B

� �?�gëìíXî"#ïð3fEóô

xå°±#¥C �UVW�*&¥C>�EFLM�#�UV��EP�s#�

ÆUV�W[#�>�mnEFLM�É¡¢ÆUV�W­+uW�*& 1 ¥[]6

^�mnEFLM�É�>ËÌ#ص6B

�XYõ��FGH

EP�s��Å�³´ùÍ��ÕÜ4�ñ��BMI [Body Mass Index*EF(kg)/� (m)2] 18.5 £´#ÆDEFG�HIÉ�18.5 ¤x 25.0 £´#Æ¥q�É�25.0 ¤x#Ƴ

´É�N& 3 �s�>6B

Page 2: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

���������� ��������

UV�W[#�>�mnEFLM���s�Yæ�EF�UVæ�EF�}�>�

��s����1�� !#(6x�EFLM��9:#²>6���]&B

���Û��Gö÷V�ö�I#s">�ËÌ>6���UV�W[#�>�mn

EFLM���EP�s ÆDEFG�HIÉ��K�9ß12kg�Æ¥q�É��K�7ß12kg�Ƴ´É��K�·#�ä¹>�@���>6GZ 1ö�IB

�1DuvEFw¡¢§QwG4,000�¤xIuÎ�UV���g��GUV��gI���.�s��

¨�s��s��Q�u�ò

/�EP�sÆ¥q�É��K�BMI �9: 18.5ß25.0 �U� �BMI ÆDEFG�HIÉ����K��mnEFLM��xå©���9:#�Ƴ´É����

K��mnEFLM��$å©�D�9:#mnN&�� ¥C>�B

C6�Ƴ´É��K���UVµ¶��UV���g��GUV��gI/O�fg

���u^­+·#�ä¹ !"�/& �BMI 25.0#��C &`���K��

«º 5kg #»¼�>�?>@C &�K���7�hijò#÷�>/ +�·¸¾

/[\#�C �·#�ä¹>�@B

�������2�����3���� !�"#$�� �����%�

��

UV�W­+uW�*& 1 ¥[]6^�mnEFLM���`�¾�u��vw>

�@67�»¼�>²>6���]&B

���Û����Gö÷V�ö�I#s">�ËÌ>6���EP�s ÆDEFG�

HIÉ¡¢Æ¥q�É��K�0.3ß0.5kg/¥�>�Ƴ´É��K�·#�ä¹>�@

���>6GZ 2ö�IB/�UVsW�q��EFLM� N&Mô��/s�k +>���/O­+�

'¥[]6^�mnEFLM��»¼#²>�/�67�q®^/O�·¸¾/[\#

�C �·#�ä¹>�@B

2UV�W*UV 16ß28¥£´ �3UVuW*UV 28¥¤)

GÅ�Îø¶�øùͪ Îø¶�øô«üýv´ 2�I

Page 3: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

�� ����� ��� �����������

���� �����

���� ���BMI�8.5��

� � ��BMI�8.5�� 25.0��

� ��BMI25.0��

9999�����2kg�2kg�2kg�2kg

7777�����2kg�2kg�2kg�2kg��

�����������������2

����!"#$%&��'()*

BMI�Body Mass Index����(kg)/+,(m)2

�� ����-.���/&012BMI -.���� ��/'3401'!���

��&�56'347892.��/'3401'!�����&:5

6'�4789��;)<=->?@4*

�2 BMI- 25.09 AB)CD&01!2EE(F 5kg9GH=@2I@JAB

)01'!2K&LMNO9PQ@R-S2TUVRWX9Y?B2��'�

�@Z4J*

�� ����� ���������� !"�#$%�

�������

���� 1[\]^_&�����

���� ���BMI�8.5��

� � ��BMI�8.5�� 25.0��

� ��BMI25.0��

0.30.30.30.3����0.5kg0.5kg0.5kg0.5kg////[[[[

0.30.30.30.3����0.5kg0.5kg0.5kg0.5kg////[[[[

����������������

����!"#$%&��'()*

BMI�Body Mass Index����(kg)/+,(m)2

#$`a'�4Z!���'b;)cdefRghi-j@4<=RklS2

� [\]^_&�����&GH9m@Z4R4^n2�o_Rk&TUV

RWX9Y?B2��'��@Z4J*

Page 4: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

���������� ����������

������ ������� !�"#�� �$�%&'()!

���������� ��� �������������������

�� �!"�#���$%�&�' (�2��)*+,&-./0�IUGR�2�3��12

34�34 (�2�4��56 (�����789:��;< �!"�#��=>? 5�6�7��

@A&�' 7��BC1D�' 5�6�8����86EFGH���IJF�5�K(0�����

789�L

9M���N�����OPQ ��� �����������N��OP

Q7RSTUV�WX����$%�&�' ((�K(3��12Y4 (0��1234 (0��

���789:��OPQ7RSTZ�WX���[N\] (4����86EFGH

���IJF�(0�(4��@A&�' 6�(5��BC1D�' 8�(5�(6���'��$6Q^Z (7��

_]`ab,&cdefg (5�����789�L

hi������������ ��N�����OPQ �������

������������������ �j�k �;< ��lm����!

S���n���N��OPQ7UV�#o��$%�&����789�(2�(3�L

�������7������� �!"�#o��N��OPQ7Z�WX

���BC1D����789: 8���������7�j�k �!"�#o�

�N��OPQ7Z�WX���heavy-for-dates& (3��p,qe�rS�$%�

7��&s�kL��BC1D 8�����789�L9M�������7�;<

�!"�#o��N��OPQ7Z�WX����'��$6Q7^Z�V���

�789� 7� hm�L

t+o��u������7vwhmMxy7UVT�zm9o��86E

FGH���IJF�{|�}~�i��I��1V�OPQ��BMI(8�<���

���o� (0K(2kgO�BMI(8K24������o� 7K(0kgO�BMI 24���;<

��o� 5K7kgO ��hm��M (9�L9M���xyo���'�����86E

FGH���IJF�{|�}~�i�������� ����OPQs (0K(4kg�

�j�k s 7K(0kg��;< s 7kg�< ��"���n�� (3�L

9M����N4�,&���5,035���'���i���X�F�����'�

�$6Q��'������"���7 imM (780¡�����u¢���[�

�OPQ �$%�&$4bBC1D�'b£0�'b�'�AQ$6 �

��s¤¥S�u¢������ �OPQ���s¦§SM 20�Lz�¨©���

Page 5: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

������������ � 9��2kg������������������

!� 5kg"#5�7kg7�9kg����$%�&'()*+,-./�0123

�2��5kg ����$%�&'(��45����67././85 �9��

��� :�;<=>?(@ABC

DBEF0G������ �H��2kg����������������

�� !� �2��5kg�5kg IJ�$%��'*+,-./�012 �5kg IJ�

$%�&'(�CDB45����� ! �2��5kg�$%�&'./85 �9

�� ! �2��5kg�5kgIJ�$%�&1�67./:���� :�;<=

>?(@ABC(KEF0G��.L@>���� �;M)('NOP8� BMI

� � QR��:���������� ! �.�6 S67./�� ! �.32 S

:()� ����:45���� ! �.46S*+,-./�� ! �.�2S

./85 �9�� ! �.09 S�T�:UVW?BCEX#��������

��45���67./�./85 �9:���� :�;<=>?(@A

BC

IJ�YG(Z[�FD\OP]^_�`a2�bc���� E�����

������ 9��2kgEF0G���� 7��2kg:aEX#����de�f

ga21'h::aBMI� 25.0���i\�jk���KKYl5kg�mn:a

oa'i\����p�� !q�rsa(�>tuv(wx�yD\de�

fga21'C

� ����� ���� ���� � ��������������

� �!"#

z{�K12OP8�|}�8^�~}aB���� �012�UVT�3�

��8v�����a21'B��mn:(��TB)����� �012�U

VR(1C��_TB)����� �012OP 3����@> 9����D�

��� 250�350g/�OP 3 ��D�: �0 ����� �00�200g/�:1G�J�UV

22��OP�^�K12 0.35�0.45kg/�OP�^�K12 0.25�0.45kg/�:1G��

>�UV 23��T�C

�����K12Institute of Medicine� �990����aB Nutrition During

Pregnancy�OP����� 4�.:a�.�:������ ��Da1��::

3�OP�^I �¡�_TB)����� �¢a21� 24�CDB¡�_TB)�

���� �012Abrams>�Y�£¤�¥ �4�D��¦^�K§����� �

¨0.05kg�5�@> 27�D���^�K§����� � 5.7kg�^�K§����

� � 4.8kg�l?©?ª«AB���������� 6.2kg��� 3070g�T

Page 6: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

���������� ���������� �9.5kg����� 3569g��� 25�

26����� !"#$%��&'(�)*��+!,�-�./012� �34��5�

������ 0.3kg/367���89:;�<=>?+IUGR��@AB� 2.68C0�.

/DEF/012�G34��5������� 0.3kg/367��@AB�2.07C0H

���� Strauss27��� HI�JK� 25�L30��MN2O��P

QR�#$./SF/T�U�V* 2 ���WXYZ[��\/]^;(_ 604

`0a�[�#$./SF/� � 34��5������0a�[bcd� 26�Pe�f

g�)*��+!,�-012�G34��5��������./�� 0.37h0.�3 kg/

3�F/�� 0.38h0.�3kg/3�)ia�-012�G34��5��������./

�� 0.34h0.�5kg/3�F/�� 0.35h0.�� kg/3�)j7-012�G34��5��

������./�� 0.2�h0.2�kg/3�F/�� 0.29h0.�5kg/3��5�)*��+!

,�-�V�G34��5�������klm�)j7-�nH�op0��Pq��

#$./rOF/012�st������ 0.3L0.5kg/3�� �#$u/4Yvd[

�st������wx:�������Myq����#$./rOF/012�G

34��5������� 0.3kg/367���� 0��z{0�������nH

r�P0.5kg/3Y��� �@AB�|Or��Hr�P

}��fgYiq~��&'(�)*��+!,�-�)ia�-�� �#$./rO

F/012�st�����Y 0.3L0.5kg/3�d�)j7-�� �����!���

HI�����Yzd[��� ��5�e�O������z��;���0klm

���������������0��d[�me��d�P

H1�#$�/0a�[�����0�������H�����d�e�HIrO�

�34��5�st������� Y¡d[�H����a¢5HI�£¤¥H¦§Y

¨q~���0��d[�mP

. ö��

G�"#$%��&DE#$.������0©[�ª«����DEJK(_¬­

���®YM����J�&'(�0#$/�¯qd������Y¡d�P

T�fg�)#$u/4Yvd[�st�����-01�[���&'(�)*

��+!,�-�� �st������ 9L�2kg�)ia�-�� �7L�2kg�)j

7-�� ���0��d[�me��d�)#$./rOF/012� � 34�

�5�st�����-01�[���&'(�)*��+!,�-DE)ia�-

�� �� 34��5�st������ 0.3L0.5kg/3�d�)j7-�� ��

�0��d[�me��d�P

Page 7: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

���������� ��������������������������

!�"#$%�&'(�)*+�,-./��0)�1�2

3�456789:;.��<�=�%�5>?@A0'BCDEF�GHI�JK�

LM�N.�O'PQD) R")�)�ST'NU��/VW�XY�Z�K�

[\&=��.2

��������

]�Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris J, Regan L, Robinson S. Is maternal underweight really

a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome? A population-based study in London.

BJOG. 200] ;]08:6]-66.

2�Ehrenberg HM, Dierker L, Milluzzi C, Mercer BM. Low maternal weight, failure to

thrive in pregnancy, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol.

2003;]89:]726-]730.

3�Spinillo A, Capuzzo E, Piazzi G, Nicola S, Colonna L, Iasci A. Maternal high-risk

factors and severity of growth deficit in small for gestational age infants. Early

Hum Dev. ]994 ;38:35-43.

4�Schieve LA, Cogswell ME, Scanlon KS, Perry G, Ferre C, Blackmore-Prince C, Yu SM,

Rosenberg D. Prepregnancy body mass index and pregnancy weight gain: associations

with preterm delivery. The NMIHS Collaborative Study Group. Obstet Gynecol.

2000;96:]94-200.

5�Murakami M, et al. Prepregnancy body mass index as an important predictor of

perinatal outcomes in Japanese. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2005;

27]:3]]-3]5

6�Edwards LE, Hellerstedt WL, Alton IR, Story M, Himes JH. Pregnancy complications

and birth outcomes in obese and normal-weight women: effects of gestational weight

change. Obstet Gynecol. ]996;87:389-394.

7�Baeten JM, Bukusi EA, Lambe M. Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight

and obese nulliparous women. Am J Public Health. 200];9]:436-440.

8�Young TK, Woodmansee B. Factors that are associated with cesarean delivery in a

large private practice: the importance of prepregnancy body mass index and weight

gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;]87:3]2-3]8

9�^_`a, bcde�f9:;.����5>?@A"ghij�9G��cklm,

]985; 26:53-55

]0��nop,q_rsc��ij��tuvw-de"��ij�cgh"fxh ]998; 6:

793-799

Page 8: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

���Rondo PH, Abbott R, Rodrigues LC, Tomkins AM. The influence of maternal nutritional

facters on intrauterine growth retardation in Brazil. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol.

�997 ;�� : �52-�66

�2)Wong W, Tang NL, Lau TK, Wong TW. A new recommendation for maternal weight gain

in Chinese women. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;�00:79�-796.

�3)�� ���� ��� � : ������������������ !"

�#$ �6%��&'(�)�*+,-./ 0123 53 980-988

Page 9: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

27)Strauss RS and Dietz WH. Low maternal weight gain in the second or third trimester

increases the risk for intrauterine growth retardation. J Nutr �999; �29:988-993

28)Muscati SK, Gray-Donald K, Koski KG. Timing of weight gain during pregnancy:

promoting fetal growth and minimizing maternal weight retention. Int J Obes Relat

Metab Disord. �996; 20:526-532.

29)Hickey CA, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, Kohatsu J, Hoffman HJ. Prenatal weight gain,

term birth weight, and fetal growth retardation among high-risk multiparous black

and white women. Obstet Gynecol. �993;8�:529-535.

30)Thame M, Osmond C, Bennett F, Wilks R, Forrester T. Fetal growth is directly

related to maternal anthropometry and placental volume. Eur J Clin Nutr.

2004 ;58:894-900.

Page 10: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

áâ

ø�

45

ùú

óô

äû

��

ëü

�­

�H

ç

ýX

î"

�%

&�

45

ùú

áâ

ø�

45

ùú

óô

äû

��

ëü

�­

�H

ç

ýX

î"

�%

&�

45

ùú

áâ

ø�

45

ùú

óô

äû

��

ëü

�­

�H

ç

ýX

î"

�%

&�

45

ùú

áâ

ø�

45

ùú

óô

äû

��

ëü

�­

�H

ç

ýX

î"

�%

&�

45

ùú

û V�

V�

V�

V�Ã<

Ã<Ã<

Ã<

uÄuÄ

äå

äåäå

äå

³´�

�ÕÜ4

³´

��ÕÜ4

³´

��ÕÜ4

³´

��ÕÜ4

���"

���"

���"

���"

����"

����"

����"

����"

EFLM�

EFLM�

EFLM�

EFLM�

(�W[)

(�W[)

(�W[)

(�W[)

5÷5÷

'

SebireNJ,Jolly

M,HarrisJ,ReganL,

Robinson

S.

Ismaternalunderweight

really

ariskfactorfor

adverse

pregnancy

outcome?Apopulation-based

study in London. BJOG. 200' ;'08:6'-66.

2'5,'05é

BMI20.0

£´#Æ�

H�

20.0¤x

25.0£´

¥q�É�>6B

UVK�g�[\�s

��uë�

ªÆ�s

��

\EK�gGÕÖg�u

��ÆÇÈ/OI��

vw�

òÁGNICU�

'��ëÊ�wEF�^Î/

OI�q��Æ�HÉ

��Æ

¥q�É

�#�

L>6B

Æ�HÉ

��?­µ6��U¶2

����wEF

5�"

�k

£´��

��]^�UV

µ¶��UV

��

�g

��GUV

��gI�s

��uë�s

��u

�/O�Æ�HÉ

��

w/

­µ6B

2

EhrenbergHM,DierkerL,

MilluzziC,

Mercer

BM.Lowmaternalweight,failure

tothriveinpregnancy,

and

adverse

pregnancy

outcomes.AmJObstetGynecol.

2003;'89:'726-'730.

'5,'96é

BMI'9.8

£´#Æ�

H�

'9.8¤x

26.0¤$

¥q�É�

27.0¤x

29.0¤$#Æ

nEF�

29.0¤x#Ƴ´É�>

6B

�UV

��EF

'00Ë

��G

45.4kgI

£´�

�UV

�BMI �H�

�K�UV

��

[]

6^�EFLM�

0.27kg£´�

�K�UV

òÁ

��

!#ËÌ>6B

�UV

��EF

'00Ë

��G

45.4kgI

£´�DEF'�

2.6%�

�H�

'3.2%�

[]6^�EFLM��D1�'�

44%�

]µ6BDEF'��

IUGR�

2hij

2.3��DuvEFwhi

j

'.5��

��.

�hij�

0.72��]µ6BÆ�HÉ��

IUGR�

2hij

'.67��DuvEFwhij

'.'3���Îh

ij�

'.22��]µ6B

[]6^�EFLM� D�'��

IUGR�

2hij

'.34��DuvEFwhij

'.22���Îh

ij�

'.''��]µ6B

3

SpinilloA,CapuzzoE,PiazziG,Nicola

S,ColonnaL,

IasciA.

Maternalhigh-

risk

factors

and

severity

of

growth

deficit

in

smallfor

gestational

ageinfants.

Early Hum Dev. '994 ;38:35-43.

SGAw

�36'3é�ä�

��>l�w

784é

\E�

�UV

��EF

50kg£´#ÆDEFÉ�

>6B

\E©OÈ�

SGA�

3hij��

!�ËÌ���

�ñi�¤

¹jü

"#ô�6B

�UV

��ÆDEFÉ�

�K�

SGA�

3�äN&�

¹Ì�Í

2�

'.75

G958CIÍ

'*

'.'8ß

2.59I�

[]6^�EFLM��

0.2kg

£´�2.86G958CIÍ

'*'.86ß

4.40I�]µ6B

4

SchieveLA,Cogswell

ME,

ScanlonKS,

PerryG,FerreC,

Blackmore-PrinceC,

Yu

SM,RosenbergD.Prepregnancybody

massindex

andpregnancyweight

gain:

associationswithpreterm

delivery.The

NMIHSCollaborative

StudyGroup.Obstet

Gynecol. 2000;96:'94-200.

3,5''é

BMI'9.8£´�#Æ�

H�

BMI'9.8ß

26.0#

ƥq��

BMI26.0#

C &

�K#Ƴ´É�

>6B

[]6^�EFLM���Îs

���

!#

ü">6Bk|

'4¥­+

28¥C��W

[�

'¥[

]6^�EFLM�#

�UV

��EP

�s

#�

¢uBK�g ]&

�K�Bz>6B

[]6

^�EFLM�

0.23kg£´#ÆDÉ�

0.23ß

0.68kg#Æ¿�¾É�

0.68kg¤x#Æ

��>

6B

[]6^�EFLM� ÆDÉ�

�K�EP

�s Æ

¥q

��

[]6^�EFLM� Æ¿�¾É�]µ6

�K��

L>

BMI'9.8£´�Æ�HÉ���Îs

���

¹Ì�Í

2�

6.7

('.',

40.6)�

BMI'9.8ß

26.0�EP

�s Æ

¥q�É��

3.6

('.6,

8.0)�

BMI26.0#C &Ƴ´É��

'.6(0.7,

3.5)�

]µ6B

5

Murakami

M,

et

al.Prepregnancybody

massindex

as

animportantpredictor

of

perinatal

outcomes

in

Japanese.

Archives

ofGynecology

andObstetrics

2005; 27':3''-3'5

633é

�UV

��

BMI

25.0¤

x#Ƴ´É

��

18.5ß

25.0#Æl�É

��

18.5

£´#Æ�HÉ

��>

6B

UV

�W

[��EFLM�ÄsQ�ÜÝR�

8.5kg¤$#Æ

nwEFLMÉ

��

'2.5kg¤x#

Æn

oEFLMÉ

��>6B

��.

�3�UV

��

�g

��GUV

��gI�UV

µ¶���

Î��vwëÊ#�L>6B

�UV

��¿�

BMI�

20.8���H�

'4.8%�Ƴ´É�

8.0%ªµ6B¿�EFLM��

'0.5kgB

\E�

�UV

��EP

#�UV

µ¶�

2UV

��

�g

��GUV

��gI

2�

�.

32�Î

32DuvEFwJK

2�vwëÊ�äN&�

¹Ì�Í

2#

\E�D

2|}s

�%

y2�ö

2EFLM�

2k|¥

y��

Ï>�76����EP

�s Æ

¥q�É��¬�Ƴ´É

��

µ¶��äN&�

¹Ì�Í

2�

7.94(95%CIÍ

'2.09ß

30.'8I�

UV

��

�g

��GUV

��gI

8.'3(3.78ß

'7.49)�

��.

�3

2.42('.05ß

5.58)�]µ6BEP

�s �H��Duv

EFw�äN&�

¹Ì�Í

2�

2.97('.40ß

6.34)��vwëÊ

'.94('.02ß

3.7')�]µ6BEFLM

�s

#�tP�ü

">6

����

�UV

��

BMI#

\E�D

2|}s

�%

y2�ö2k|

¥y��Ï>6

�K�

! /­µ6B

¿�EFLM�

�'0.5kg

UV

��

�g

��GUV

��gI Ðg�Fg#s*

�/�BLBW�

49.9%�?

7B

�' NICU*�vw

v��ð.Ñ

�2ÑIUGR*Èúß|wf

x��ÑÑ

�3Ñ

SGA*

small-for-gestational ageÑÑ�

4ÑLBW*low-birth weightÑ

�5ÑHBW*high-birth weightÑ

�6Ñ

SFD*

small-for-dateÑ�7ÑLFD*large-for-dateÑ

Í' Cl*Çb

�[ÑÍ

2�

¹Ì�*]&�YGOÈI�

R�C&� �º��Y�]�C+/����¬©�]&

��#î6N

���

��­#²N°

Page 11: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

��

����

����

����

��

����

����

����

����

��

����

��

�� ��

�� ��

�� ��

�� ��

�����

�����

�����

�����

�����

�����

�����

�����

�����

�����

�����

�����

(���

)(���

)(���

)(���

)

� �

6

Edwards

LE,

Hellerstedt

WL,

Alton

IR,

Story

M,

Himes

JH.

Pregnancy

complications

and

birth

outcomes

in

obese

and

normal-weight

women:

effects

of

gestational

weight

change.

Obstet

Gynecol.!996;87:389-394.

"#$%�&'(

)�*

683+,(-

./)�*

660+

"#$%�

BMI!9.001

26.023(-./)4

29.0013567893

(),:7;

<=>?3@A:7()BC�:4DEF

@AGFHIJFKL@AMNOPQRSTU

V7(-./)B3�W,:XYZ:7;?�

LBW/SGA[

4[

3\�4

3000]2�?�^94

4000g356_?�^9C.`Xab:7;

()BOc�����,#$defg#$hij�kl4

mnopq,�rsctuvwxyz7;#${C|}_��

��'~vwxyz7�4�_`c��:7()��O

c4

7�!!.5kg��:7��,a�4

SGA[

3?3@A�_���

'�Q�a�2O2.9�O�z7;

7

Baeten

JM,

Bukusi

EA,

Lambe

M.

Pregnancy

complications

and

outcomes

among

overweight

and

obese

nulliparous

women.

Am

JPublic

Health.

200!;9!:436-

440.

96,80!+

BMI20.023(g

V)4

20.001

24.90�

3(-./)4

25.001

29.90�3(���)4

30.0013()C@

�:7;

LBW[

44

HBW[

54SFD[

64��4mnop4�?�

�4#$def4#$hijl�B�#${�

l���"#$%��&�C���34��H

IF�� ¡¢£¤¥F�¦�§¨ #©ª«¬

«p­%�Fª®¯°�E�F�����O±

²:4³´:7;

(gV),a�4(),(���)Ocdef4mno

p4

HBW[

54�?��4#$hijl�B�#${�l����

�'§µChyz7;

8

Young

TK,

Woodmansee

B.

Factors

that

are

associated

with

cesarean

delivery

in a

large

private

practice:

the

importance

of

prepregnancy

body

mass

index

and

weight

gain.

Am

JObstet

Gynecol.

2002;!87:3!2-3!8

<=@A

3,376+

"#$%

BMI20.024

20.001

25.024

25.0

01

30.024

30.001

�4BC@}7;

"#$%��&4�����,mnopq�r

s3¶·:7;

¸��mnopqc

2!.76%O��4?¹º»¼½¾�

CPD)C¿

_mnopc!!.7!%O�z7;

BMI20.02BCa�4ÀÁ

BMI

�h`B�mnop��Q�a�

2c

9.25(95%CI�!:

8.5�

9.9)O

�z7;

BMI20.02BOc�����'!3.6kg2�89Ca

�4!6kg356_,mnop��Q�a�

2c

3.8�

95%CI�!:3�

4.6�4

BMI20.001

25.02BOc!.85�

95%CI�!:!.63�

2.06

)O��4�

2BOc�����,mnopq,��Crsc

tuvwxyz7;

9

ÃÄÅÆ

,ÂÇ#©C|}_#${�

�����,�È9ÉlC.`XÇ��Ê

> !985;

26:53-55

59+,�

�Ì238+

"#$%�

Broc

aÍN

+20%013()4

Î10

%3(�),:

7;

#$hijl�B�#${�l�F

heav

y-fo

r-da

tes?^9FÏÐ?^93ab:7;

#$hijl�B�#${�l��^9c()

30.5

%4(Ë

�)

4.1%4

heav

y-fo

r-da

tes?�^9c()

18.6

%4(Ë

�)

9.7%4ÏÐ?�^9c()

8.47

%4(�)

1.78

%O

�z7;mnopqc()

20.3

%4(Ë�)Ñ

%O�z7;

O9Él�x`

appr

opri

ate-

for-

date

s?3Ò�:7Á�Oc

#$

26ÓÔO������'

3.3Î

2.0k

g4#${������

'6.

7Î2.

7kgO�z7Õ,yv4

26ÓÔO����3

4kg4#$

��3Ö×Xc

7kg3ØÙ:7;

(),(�)BC|

}_HIFÚÛFÜ�MN

�ÝÞx:;

!0

hßàá

,âÄãäÇ#$9Él�å°æç

-,#$9ÉlÇ�È,©DÈ!998;

6: 793-799

��<=@A

550+

BMI!8.001

24.023

(èé)B,:7;

�����3#$��

280GCêë:4!0kg2

4!0�!2kg4!2�!4ì!4�!6kg4!6kg01�

5BC@}4!0�!2kg3��C#©íi #$hi

jl�B�#${�l�Foîï�Foî��

����3ab:7;

����c

9.9kgO�z7;#$hijl�B�#${�

l�c!4kg01O�Q�a�

2!.9!�!.2!�

3.00�4!6kg01O

2.65(!.39�

5.05)O��4oîï�c!0kg2O!.63�!.04�

2.54�4oî��Á!.60�!.!8�

2.!7�O�z7;"#$%�

BMI'

26.001O#$hijl�B�#${�l���Q�a�

2

c3.!6O�z7;

����

c9.9kg

!!

!!�

Rondo

PH,

Abbott

R,

Rodrigues

LC,

Tomkins

AM.

The

influence

of

maternal

nutritional

facters

on

intrauterine

growth

retardation

in

Brazil.

Paediatr

Perinat Epidemiol. !997 ;!! : !52-!66

IUGR[

2?3!5+,�W

Bèé?

32!+

BMI20.023(g

V)4

20.001

25.02

3(-./)4

25.001

30.023(���)4

30.0013(),:

7;

IUGR[2Crs�_!3ñòC.`Xóô�õö�

÷øQ�¶·3ùz7;

IUGR[

2����Cúû�_ñò,:X�=@Aüý���

50.0kg0�4��4����

7kg0�4þM

LBW[

4?Ò�'�Ò

Uw7;

!2

Wong

W,

Tang

NL,

Lau

TK,

Wong

TW.

Anew

recommendation

for

maternal

weight

gain

in

Chinese

women.

JAm

Diet

Assoc.

2000;!00:79!-796.

<=@A

908+

BMI!9.023(g

V)4!9.001

23.52

3(-./)4

23.501

3(),:7;

37�

4!ÓO��

2500g�

4000g�?3@A:4#

$9Él�~vwxyz7(��x#$��B�

504+���yv��x�����3 u

7;(��x#$��B�C|}_������

25�

75���S�¥�3 u4Õw3��,

:7;

(��x#$��B��ð½�����c!3.8Î

4.2kgO�z

7;¸�C|}_!Ó��7�������c

0.06Î0.35kg4{

�C|`Xc

0.5!Î

0.33kg4��C|`Xc

0.45Î

0.22kgO

�z7;(gV)�������3!3.0�!6.7kg4(-.

/)3!!.0�!6.4kg4()3

7.!�!4.4kg,:7,Õ�4�

����'¼��89�

LBW[

4��Q�a�

2c

2.764�����

'���89�@A%����Q�a�

2c2.!6O�z7;

!3.8Î4.2kg

LBW[

46.2%C�:4

HBW[

5'

2.7%,G�D�@�C�

`;

[! NICU��>?�{�� ![

2!IUGR�ç"#=?k¢$%!![3!SGA�small-for-gestational age!![4!

LBW�

low-birth weight![

5!HBW�high-birth weight![

6!SFD�small-for-date![

7!LFD�large-for-date!

�! Cl�&'(�!�2!�Q�a��_)*�æç�C+XcÔ_D'4,�)*C�XcÔvx`DCa�X-��_��3.7�/0�'h`y31�ÍË

Page 12: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

V�

V�

V�

V�Ã<

Ã<Ã<

Ã<

�ô

V�

�ô

V�

�ô

V�

�ô

V�

äå

äåäå

äå

³´�

�ÕÜ4

³´

��ÕÜ4

³´

��ÕÜ4

³´

��ÕÜ4

���"

���"

���"

���"

����"

����"

����"

����"

EFLM�

EFLM�

EFLM�

EFLM�

(�W[)

(�W[)

(�W[)

(�W[)

5÷5÷

'3

x�

�����

���� 

¡:

\E

EFa

Ì�¢�i£j�¤

�/°

��>

�UV

'6¥EFLM��

q��

N&ËÌ

Åζ¦

53

','26é

BMI18.09

�(

�4

¿��

18.0:

N24.09

�(

�;

!�

��24.0:

N(

��

��

��

.&

jw

z2,z

6,2

0,2

4,2

8,3

6�

§<

�n

��

\I

�j

w�

�=

n�

�\

I(

�v

jw

x�

��>

9L?@

�.

&�

�>

9L=

n�

�\

I(

�4

¿�5A

��;

!�

�6A

���

��7A

L�

,�

�B

op

4j

wCDE

FGA

Wj

w�HF

]1

/I

½�J

�K

�"

%n

��

\I

(4

�.

&

=n

��

\I

�L

jw<M

Lb

,%

n�

�\

I8

1#

.&

jw

z6<

>�

�\

I�=

n�

�\

I�

R=0.6

08�OP

"Q

ú(

7�

.&

jw

z2<

>�

n�

�\

I�=

n�

�\

IL

�Q

ú8R

/*

"1

#.

&LBWU

4�

�4

¿�8kg9

�A

>2z%�

�;

!�

�7kg9

�A

>z3|

22%�C

6�heavy-for-datesb

��;

!�

�z0kg:

NA

>z2|

z6%�C

1#

.&

�4

¿��c

en

��

\I

(z0|

z4kg

��;

!�

�(

7|

z0kg

���

��(

7kg9

��

�.

&

��>

9�

n�

�\

��

8d

"#

�$

%&ef

�Bg

M�b

��

9�hi<M

")

bn

�Ljk

5%lm

(n

o�

�$

"$

&

'4

��§

,¨©ªÈ�U¶�EFLM�º�U

VJs

�J|wf

x�����q��ζ

�ø�ð

'975; 3':646-655

806s

�é

/>

UVsW­+

ÚÃ

'%Ò

x�Êzî�EF3Õ#

Ø��´W�|vw#86

é�q�UVÃ

#

EFLMÓÔ#

_�>6BEFLM�

LFD/SFD�

7

�6��

!�Îø����

!�q�ü

"#

>6B

UV

4ÕÃC��

�UV

��EF��¬���

ÏOST A+,

/­µ6B

40¥��EFLM��¿��

9.99kg�]^�uv

�wEF�

3225.6Ö

380.5g�]µ6B

LFD�

7w#s

�>6

\�

EFLM��¿��

9.96kg�]^�

SFD�

6w��

9.00kg�]µ

6BEFLM�

'4.64kgG¿�

+'.5SDI#C &'��æW×

/2UV

��

�g

��GUV

��gI��

�­µ6 �s

��[�u

���EFLM��

!�è7+,/­µ6B

LFD�

7w#s

�>

6\Ç�¿�E

FLM��

9.96kg�SFD�6w

��

9.00kg�

]µ6B

� �s�

k /�67�

BMI<

~B

'5

Johnson

JW,

Longmate

JA,

Frentzen

B.

Excessive

maternal

weight

and

pregnancy

outcome.

Am

JObstet

Gynecol.

'992;'67:353-70; discussion 370-372.

38¥

¤)�s

�é

3,'9'é

BMI'9.8

£´#Æ�

H�

'9.8¤x

26.0¤$

¥q�É�

27.0¤x

29.0¤$#Æ

nEF�

29.0¤x#Ƴ´É�>

6B

\�

�UV

��EP

#�EFLM��

LBW�

4�

HBW�

5(4000g¤xI�Ø

/ÙÚ�

'2ás��¢

��i

î��ÛÜ

��.

��ÝÞ¢Ê�s

�ÊØ����|w

�ß����àá

�â

H�D

1��vwãv�

ªÆ�äå

ÉÎ�

nWÎ/O

�����

!#ü

">6B

EFLM�Q

('7kg¤xI�

!>�6��

HBW�

5�ÛÜ

��

.��|w�ß���Ø

/ÙÚ�]µ6B

LBW�

42.3%�ä>�

HBW�

5

'2.2%�?�B

'6

«�¬~

,­®HqÈ

,ë ¯°�

,7�

s�

ɱ#²³N&yOÈ�ËÌ

'�

)Uζ�EF s

��¡N���q�

�Îø�¶�øÑ'987æ54*'85'-'855

',736é

�UV

��Broca°

y

+20%

¤x#Æ�¾³

´É�+10ß

20%#Ƴ

´É

��Ö10%#Æl

�É

���10%£´#

Æ�HÉ

��>6B

UV

�W

[��EFLM�#

6.8kg¤$#Æ

nw

EFLMÉ

��

6.8ß

'8.5kg#Æä�É

��

'8.5kg¤x#Æ

noEFLMÉ

��>�s

��

[��

�.

�3�wEF#�L>6B

Æ�¾³´É

��

7.8%�Ƴ´É

��

'6.7%�Æ�HÉ

��

'3.9%�]µ6BÆ�HÉ

��Æ�¾³´É�«^�¿�EFL

M� ?­µ6BÆ

noEFLMÉ

��

5.8%�Æ

nwEFL

��

4.8%�]µ6BsÎ�Æ�¾³´É

���s

��

[

 ­µ6 �`Î��} /­µ6BsÎ�Æ

noEFLMÉ

��s

��

[

 ­µ6 �`Î��} /­µ6B

��.

�3�Æ�¾³´É

��Ƴ´É

��C6Æ

noEFLMÉ

��

�­µ6BuvEF�Æ�¾³´É

��Ƴ´É

��Æ�HÉ

�«^

�@�Æ

noEFLMÉ

��Æ

nwEFLMÉ

�«^

�­µ6B

\�

�UV

��EP�U

V��EFLM��

!

÷�Z,�/�B

'7

µ�

,,7�³´U¶���a

�

N&

ܶ¾�·¸¾���Åζ¦

229-236.

Ƴ´ÉU¶151é

Ƴ´��H�

�Õ

(1986)�

�UV

��

 2EF

2�D­+75%

¤x���#Ƴ´É�

�ÕB

Ƴ´ÉU¶#EFLM�

#�4�G0kg£´�0

ß5kg�

5ß10kg�10kg

¤xI�s*�

��.

�3

2çÈs

�3

2s

��u

��

2s

��

[2

heavy-for-dateswJK#�L>6B

4�[�

��.

�3��} (+,/­µ6BEFLM#R6Z

/­µ6

�GN=14I���çÈs

� A+,/­µ6Bs

��

u���EFLM� ?­µ62q�

��7�2���¬�?

­µ6B¿�s

��

[�s�EFLM

w/�

��Oè

­µ6 �`ζ��} /­µ6BEFLM#R6Z/­µ

6���heavy-for-datesw�A+,/­µ6B

EFLM��

w/­µ62

���7�

���¬

�U

V��EF

ªq�F�B

>­�UVsW­+��

h�

³å#)*�6'

C,�&B

'8

�����UV

�EFLM����#¡

N"O¹¢�

noEFLMU¶�a

�

N&���ºïQ¦Ñ'984; 42:355-368

Îøzî�ÕW¾EF

�é��#)*6U¶

53'é

�UV

��Broca°

10%#ÆA�É�+10ß

20%#ÆB�É�+20%

¤

x#ÆC�É��10

ß

20%#ÆD�É��20%

¤$#ÆE�É�>6B

BC�#Æ

¥�^êÉ�

DE�#Æ�HêÉ�A�

�4êÉ�>6B

EFLM�

2wEF

µ���

2¨�s

�2

��.

�2s

��u

��

2UV

��

�g

��

GUV

��gI#�L>6BUV

26¥»�EF

LM#

4.9kg¤$#Æ

nwEFLMÉ

��

8.'kg

¤x#Æ

noEFLMÉ

��>6BUVuW�

��

8.0kg¤$#Æ

nwEFLMÉ

��

'5.'kg¤

x#Æ

noEFLMÉ

��>6B

UV

�W�EFLM�q���Hê�

27.9%�

¥�^ê�

8.8%

n

oêBuW�EFLM�q����Hê�

25.0%�

¥�^

ê�

'3.9%

noêB

�W�Æ

noEFLMÉ

��wEF

3500g

¤x�

33.7%�Æ

nwEFLMÉ

��

'0.3%�]µ6Bë

µ��

�2¨�s

�2

��.

�2s

��u

��

2UV

��

�g

��

GUV

��gI�N¬��

�W�Æ

noEFLMÉ

��

�� �­µ6B

�W�EFLM�

�s

#�

�L�õ�

\�

�UV

��EP ÷

�Z,�/

�B¿�EFLM��<

~

�' NICU*�vw

v��ð.Ñ

�2Ñ

IUGR*Èúß|wf

x��ÑÑ�

SGA*small-for-gestational ageÑÑ

�4ÑLBW*low-birth weightÑ�5Ñ

HBW*

high-birth weightÑ

�6Ñ

SFD*

small-for-dateÑ

�7Ñ

LFD*

large-for-dateÑ

Í' Cl*Çb

�[ÑÍ

2�

¹Ì�*]&�YGOÈI�

R�C&� �º��Y�]�C+/����¬©�]&�

�#î6N

��� ��­#²N°

Page 13: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

ûû$

�g

�ë

qr�

ë�

��

�\�

ü×

@=

ç

ýX

î"

�%

&�

45

ùú

$�

g�

ëq

r�

ë�

��

�\�

ü×

@=

ç

ýX

î"

�%

&�

45

ùú

$�

g�

ëq

r�

ë�

��

�\�

ü×

@=

ç

ýX

î"

�%

&�

45

ùú

$�

g�

ëq

r�

ë�

��

�\�

ü×

@=

ç

ýX

î"

�%

&�

45

ùú

V�

V�

V�

V�Ã<

Ã<Ã<

Ã<

äå

³´��ÕÜ4

���"

����"

EFLM�

(�W

[)

UVsW

[]6^�

EFLM�

UV�W

[]6^�

EFLM�

UVuW

[]6^�

EFLM�

uv�

EF

'2

(çì)

WongW,TangNL,LauTK,WongTW.

Anewrecommendationformaternal

weight

gaininChinesewomen.J

Am Diet Assoc. 2000;'00:79'-796.

�|s

�908é

BMI'9.0£´#Æ�

H�

'9.0¤x

23.5¤$#Æ

¥q

��

23.5¤x#

Ƴ´É�>6B

37ß

4'¥�EF

2500gß

4000g�vw#s

�>�UVK�g�(+,/­µ6Æ}

ø/UV

òÁ

�þ504é�s�

k­+

Ìí

¾/EFLM�#�76BÆ}

ø/UV

òÁ

�þ�*&EFLM��

25ß

75�

"�

k�1#�7��,#Ü4�>

6B

Æ}

ø/UV

òÁ

�þ�¿�EFLM��

'3.8Ö

4.2kg�]µ6BsW�

[]6

^�EFLM��

0.06Ö

0.35kg�

�W�

0.5'Ö

0.33kg�uW�

0.45Ö

0.22kg�

]µ6BÆ�HÉ�

ÌíEFLM�#

'3.0ß

'6.7kg�Æ

¥q�É#

''.0ß

'6.4kg�Ƴ´É#

7.'ß

'4.4kg�>6�

���EFLM�<=�

�K�LBW�

4�

�¹Ì�Í

2�

2.76�EFLM�

no�

K�s

��u�

¹Ì�Í

2�

2.'6�

]µ6B

'3.8Ö

4.2

GkgI

0.06Ö0.35

GkgI

0.5'Ö0.33

GkgI

0.45Ö0.22

GkgI

LBW�

436.2%�ä

>�HBW

�5

2.7%�Å

���

s����B

22

ÍxÎ��UVJs

�JÎÏ`

n�

\EEF�S

¬�º�·¸�ζ�ø

�ð

'976;33:88-9'

2,000

éG

'973ß

'974I

/>

UVsW­+

ÚÃ

'%�î¹Qùï/�Ê

zî�EF3Õ#Ø��´W�|vw#

86

é�q�UVÃ

#EFLMÓÔ#

_�>6BEFLM�LFD/SFD�

7�

6��

!�Îø����

!�q�ü

">

6B

UV

'0ß

'2¥C����

ÏO

�UV

��

EF��¬�ST A+,/­µ6Bs

��C��¿�EFLM��

''.7kg�]

^�EFLM�

'2kg�

�K�wEF

���

Á

yr=0.59�]µ6 �

'2kg#

C &�r=0.3'�D$>6B

� �s�

k

/�67

BMI<

~B

23

Щ¨ÑÈ,7�UV�

\EEFLM

��

N&ËÌ�

\��v

'977;'7:85-89

',3'4é

/>

zî)

¦��EF3Õ­+EFLM

3�

EFLM�#

¢u>6B

�EFLM��

¿�(67

¤xLM>6'#Æ��L

��¿�

-67

¤$�]µ6��#

ÆñòÉ

��>6BUV�

�WJuW�E

FLM

3�¿�1#º,ó,

®¢>�¿

�(67

¤xLM>6'#Æ��LMÉ

��¿�

-67

¤$�]µ6��#Æñ

òÉ��>6B

�EFLM��

''.'9Ö

3.45kg�]µ6B

�UVW

[��Æ��LMÉ

��LFD*7

?@�ÆñòÉ

��

SFD*6 ?­µ6BU

V�

��g

��GUV

��gI

2��s

�2¨�s

�2�¢

�°

y2u

���

EFLM�

!/>B

�WJuW�EFL

M3ÆñòÉ

��UV

��

�g

��GU

V�

�gI ?­µ6B

�W��L

��LFD�

7 ?@�

SFD�

6

w/­µ

6B

� �s�

k

/�67

BMI<

~B

24

Institute

of

Medicine.

Subcommittee

on

Nutritional

Status and Weight Gain in

Pregnancy.

Nutrition

during

pregnancy:partÒ

,weight

gain.

National

Academy

Press,

Washington

D.C.,

'990.

H{�

'980ß

89����Z,6

'0���

­+�UV

��

[]6^�EFLM�

#�76B

UV

�W­+uW�

[]6^�EFL

M��

0.3ß

0.7kg�]µ6B³´'�

��EFLM�

ê+qR QR­µ6B

25

AbramsB,Carmichael

S,

SelvinS.

Factors

associated

with

the

pattern

ofmaternal

weight

gain

duringpregnancy.ObstetGynecol.

'995; 86:'70-'76.

�|s

�'0,4'8é

BMI'9.8£´#Æ�

H�

'9.8¤x

26.0¤$#Æ

¥q

��

26.0¤x

29.0¤$#Æ

nE

F�

29.0¤x#

Ƴ´É�>6B

UV

�W¡¢uW�

�D

2%

�qEF3Õ

#)*6äå'�q��U¶�

¦��

�3ÕEF1#ô�6�%Ás

"�«^

UV

�W¡¢uW�

[]6^�EFL

M�#�76BsW�

[]6^�EF

LM���UV

��EFLM�­+

�WJ

uW�

[]6^�EFLM�#��6

���>¢u>6B

Æ�HÉ�Æ

¥q�ÉEê������

UV

�W�

[]6^�EFLM� �

��@�³´'��uW�

�­µ6Bs

W�

[]6^�EFLM���D�õ

� #²>6 �

�W��

�UV

��

BMI2s

�%

y�õ�

#²>�uW��

UV

��

��l�

��D�s

�%

y�

õ� #²>6B

0.'69Ö

0.268(g)

0.563Ö

0.236(g)

0.5'8Ö

0.234(g)

�' NICU*�vw

v��ð.Ñ�2ÑIUGR*Èúß|wf

x��ÑÑ�3ÑSGA*small-for-gestational ageÑÑ�4ÑLBW*low-birth weightÑ�5ÑHBW*high-birth weightÑ�6ÑSFD*

small-for-dateÑ�7ÑLFD*large-for-dateÑ

Í' Cl*Çb�

[ÑÍ2Ñ�¹Ì�*]&�YGOÈI�

R�C&� �º��Y�]�C+/����¬©�]&

��#î6N

���

��­#²N°�

Page 14: Œ ? gºìíXî#ïð3fEFGHrhino.med.yamanashi.ac.jp/sukoyaka/pdf/ninpu04.pdfŒ ? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEFGH? gº ìíXî"#ïð3fEIJ æò 204~¡¢304~ * &EP ›s s− QR@ST> &BDE FG HI

V�

V�

V�

V�Ã<

Ã<Ã<

Ã<

äå

³´��ÕÜ4

���"

����"

EFLM�

(�W

[)

UVsW

[]6^�

EFLM�

UV�W

[]6^�

EFLM�

UVuW

[]6^�

EFLM�

uv�

EF

26

Abrams

B,

Selvin

S.

Maternal

weight

gain

pattern

and

birth

weight.

Obstet

Gynecol.

'995;

86:'63-'69.

­��|

s�

4,420

é

U¶�

¦���3ÕEF1#ô�6�%

Ás

"�«^UV

�W�uW�EFLM

3#�7�º,#

'3.3�>

�WJuW�

LM�#

¢u>6BsW�EFLM��

UV

��EFLM�­+

�WJuW�LM

�#��6���>�76B�W�E

FLM��

25�"

�k

�1#$%µ

6�K#Æ

L�>�LM

Ðk�

��w�

uv�EF�� !#ü">6B

�W��EFLM�

'kg]6^�wEF�

32.8gLM>6BUV

��EFLM� l

�9:ß�]µ6

�K��¬�

LLL2

NLL2

LLN�

�K�º,ó,

248g2

88.5g2

'33g�wEF w/­µ6B

'6.7Ö

5.0(g)

2.'Ö

3.3(kg)

G25�"

�k�1

-0.05kgI

7.7Ö

2.9(kg)G25

�"�k

�1

5.7kgI

6.6Ö

2.7(kgIG

25

�"�k

�14.8kgI

3485.8Ö

523.'(g)

27

Strauss

RS

and

Dietz

WH.

Low

maternal

weight

gain

in

the

second

or

third

trimester

increases

the

risk

for

intrauterine

growth

retardation.

J Nutr '999;'29:988-993

'0,696é

UVsW�

�W�uWº,ó,�

[]

6^�¿�EFLM�#�76BsW�

�'¥

[]6^�EFLM� �

0.'ö�

£´�

�K�

�W�uW�

0.3kg£´�

�K#º,ó,DEFLM��>6B,E

FLM�

6.8kg£´#EFLM<}�>

6B

BMI20.0£´#Æ�HÉ�

20.0ß

25.0

£´#Æ

¥q�É�

25.0¤x#Ƴ´É

�>6BlW�

2500g£´�

�K#

IUGR

�2�>6B

�W�DEFLM��

IUGR�

2hij '.8

ß2.6��]^�uW�

�K�

'.7ß

2.5�

�]µ6BÆ�HÉ��

�W�DEFL

M��

IUGR�

2hij

2.68��]^�u

W��K�2.07��]µ6B

'0.4Ö

4.5

GkgI�

''.5Ö

4.6

GkgI�

2�

0.'4Ö0.23

GkgI�

0.'9Ö0.24

GkgI�2�

0.36Ö0.'7

GkgI�

0.4'Ö0.'6

GkgI�

2�

0.27Ö0.20

GkgI�

0.30

Ö0.'6GkgI

�2�

3287Ö

469GgI

�340'Ö

470GgI

�2�

28

Muscati

SK,

Gray-Donald

K,

Koski

KG.

Timing

of

weight

gain

during

pregnancy:

promoting

fetalgrowth

and

minimizing

maternal

weight

retention.Int

JObes

RelatMetab

Disord.'996; 20:526-532.

��ö­

����

�|lW

Îs

�37'

é

'983�

Metropolitan

Life

Insurance�«

&�4EF�ä

>�

�UV

�EF

90%£´#Æ�

H�

90ß

'20%#

ƥq��

'20%

#� 6'#Æ

nEF�>6B

UV

20ß

30¥�

[�s

�æÀ¥

[�s

��

[�EF3Õ#Ø��UV

��EF

LM��s

���EF�Lk#ü

">

6B

75%����

�UV

���¬�s

��EF

�2.5kg¤xLM>�6BUV

��'2kg

¤xEF L &�s

���EF j+

/�

¯¨�]µ6B

20¥C��EFLM

� QR��O�s

���EF L &

¯¨�]µ6B

2'ß

30¥�

[�EFLM

�'kg]6^wEF�

3'gLM>6B

'6.'Ö

6.4

GkgI

29

Hickey

CA,

Cliver

SP,

Goldenberg

RL,

Kohatsu

J,

Hoffman

HJ.

Prenatal

weight

gain,

term

birth

weight,

and

fetal

growth

retardation

among

high-risk

multiparous

black

and

white

women.

Obstet

Gynecol.

'993;8':529-535.

÷���

�lWÎ

s�

803é

�­��

�s

�365

é

BMI'9.8£´#Æ�

H�

'9.8¤x

26.0¤$#Æ

¥q

��

27.0¤x

29.0¤$#Æ

nE

F�

29.0¤x#

Ƴ´É�>6B

IOM�EFLMÜ4��¬wEF�

��

��L>6B

÷�����³´'�

6kg¤x�EF L

 6

�K�

IUGR�

2w�JK ­���

¬�

ªq�w/­µ6G4.2%�''.8%I

÷�'2.5

GkgI�

­�

'3.'

GkgI

3268

GgI

30

Thame

M,

Osmond

C,

Bennett

F,

Wilks

R,

Forrester

T.

Fetal

growth

is

directly

related

to

maternal

anthropometry

and

placental

volume.

Eur

JClin

Nutr. 2004 ;58:894-900.

'5ß

404

C��U

¶374é

UV

'4,'7,20,25,30,35¥�

6%�®6µ

�|w�|h�f

x[\#Cøù��

3Õ>6B

'0¥­+

20¥C��

\EEFLM

3G

[]6^

)#

0.5kg¤$�

0.5'ß

'.00kg�

'.00ß

'.50kg�

'.5'kg¤x�

4�

��L>6����

35¥

��|h�

|w�ú:���EFLM

3

���O

QR­µ6B|hà��wEF�l�

>6B

3.'3Ö

0.6

GkgI

�' NICU*�vwv��ð.Ñ�2ÑIUGR*Èúß|wf

x��ÑÑ�3ÑSGA*small-for-gestational ageÑÑ

�4ÑLBW*low-birth weightÑ�5ÑHBW*high-birth weightÑ�6ÑSFD*small-for-dateÑ�7ÑLFD*large-for-dateÑ

Í' Cl*Çb�[ÑÍ2Ñ�¹Ì�*]&�YGOÈI�

R�C&� �º��Y�]�C+/����¬©�]&

��#î6N���

��­#²N°�