Download - ˘ˇˆ˙˝˛˚ - toyo.ac.jp

Transcript

� �������� �������� ��� ���������� ! "

#$%&��'()� *+,-./01234-.��56�)789�:;<=>?@ A)

BCDEFG� �H�IJKH�@ L��M��N1(;� O P

QR ST PQ O S �U1V) � �<=>?WNXY

�Z�[\]./) � *^ �WW_�`a���@���b) � ���*789VW/-G

c) de�fg@hijk) lm�8nI o�G�) �pqb(;�T M1N�M�WN) �

*rs��tuvtwxGyz�u�G/A��{AN1�T M�U|G� �}b() 789-

.�%&�a�U|G}~) �G_�) �����@�|�W�;| o*) %&���� ��

���@{A�|A-� GD��-.�T ���� �*) � �;|tuvtwxGyz�u

�}��������� ��� ������ �@����M�-.�T

� �tuvt����;(��� �@�2b(;���� N O

S �� �tuvt -.

�T N�� �tuvt -*) rs��tuvtwxGyz�u���b2�f*)

yz�u��� �U'(���������G�1) ����) �f�tuvtH����

�^����1(;�T ��) �����*��I������� �b(¡ �1) �����

��������� �@¢�b2£c�¤¥�G�1(;� O ST bWb) �

�}�������) �G_�) � tuvt����� O¦§) � �����S �����

���� �@��b2¢���*¨9��©/ ! O S � O S �k-.�T

O S *� 34�.�ª«^ ¬@}­�) ����� O

S) |®¯°) ±�u²����³�Ga@´ µ¶�

U'(·¸b2T ����) ¹º�G����� O� @»�U|�bG;Ga�¼ ½S � |

! "

� �������� �������� ��� ���������

� � �

� �

� �

� � �

� �

� �

� �

� �

� ��

� ��

� � �

� �

�� �

123

Harvey & Hansen, ;

, ; Kaczmarek & Backlund,

Lazarus Folkman & Laza-

rus, , ; Lazarus, , ; Lazarus & Folkman, ,

Lazarus

Lazarus, ,

Mearns

Mearns Coping Behaviors Inven-

tory : Kirsch, Mearns & Catanzaro,

Tsukasa KATO

E ects of cognitive appraisal and coping with broken

heart on psychological adjustment after break-up

,***

+323 +331 +33+ +331

+32* +32/ +33- +333 +32. +321

+33- +333

,**/ +33+

+33+ ++.

+33*

#

����� � �

��� ������� ���� ������ � � !" #$�%� &��

' ( )��'*+ �, -./0��1 2 *+��" 34536789:; /<=

��� ; ! 1 1 �>?@1 A ?B1 CDE1 FG+�� ��HI; / J

�K��LM������ �+�1 ��>?@! NOPQ1 A ?B1 CDE�FG+�!

NR Q �ST�UVWX7�Y�Z+�1 1 OP!" [�3453 \/]��^1 " �

_� `*+�R &a/ +^�K�1 R !" [�3453 \/bc�^1 " �_�

`*+�R &a/ d�^�K��e� +*�������

f 1 ��g �h!i ��> j��J�kl �%m1 nKh!1 " �o p \�

�J�kl�������� �*�1 i ��> j��J�kl�q��01 " [�o p

\�3453 \/rsn�[�g \��� t/uM��kl �!vc�� �

�e � E

w1 � ���'/xy���klh!1 " �xJ� \ �

1 " �xJ� z �" �_�{|1 " �

xJ�694}7~�1 " �� t 1 g 3453 \�e/� �1 � v�� t/uM

��� n���1 " /� h%�� J��e1 " /{|�� J��e1 " �xJ�

R � \ � �_�����e � �S��e1 g 3453 \�S�1 � ���

���

n� � !c��0��1 " 6789:��� �����>/LM��kl��q_�1

+�g 3453 *+1 " �xJ� zq_�" 6789:����3

453 \���/��JK��� hC��

klh!1 z�� �{|q_��"/ ��� +�g 3453 h

!1 {|! ����� �"�� J� 1 �"!Jh��+*���/�����0���

J� 1 ��59�� 1 fT z� ��� z�� T�h%�����

�� � � f 1 i ��

> j��J�klh!1 "  � \���1 {|%��!�"�¡E+�� v �" �_�

¢£¤¥� �e �¦ /%��kl� ����qm1 n�+�kl� �!1 {|%��

!�"�n�[�g \�� ����K�/LM�� �������� �§H ¨©

ª �e � n��Z1 {|q_��"!" [�g \�«

¬�f�h%��¡E+���

" 6789:�� ����!1 klh!x�34536789:; �� ª ª ª

/ ��� � � �x�34536789:; !1 x��>�­¬��

3453®~�¯°94�xJ�6789:���±/� J��Z�<=���0�h%��

; !² �x��>/³ ����<=���0�h%��1 n� \ ´!² �x��

>��h�µ1 ¶·¸¹º»a�x��> �� ª 1 ¼½h�x��> �� ª �q

�� � � � ��

� � �

� � � � �

� � �� � �� � �

� �� �

� �� �

� � � � � �

� � �

� ! " #$ % �

! " % �

� �& ' �

(

)�*

� � � � + '

� ) )

�� � , -� � � �

� ( �

� . )�*

� �

� )�* / 0 � .

1 ' )

' ) 23 �* #4 )�* ��

� !

" � +

-� 5 � 6

�& 7 � 8

� �& ��

/ � � �

0 � �

� 2

� 9� $ & : 9�

� �

� �

124

- ( )

Frazier

& Cook, ; Smith & Cohen, ; Sorensen, Russell, Harkness, & Harvey,

Smith & Cohen Impact Event

Scale : Horowitz, Wilner, & Alvarez,

Lazarus

Lazarus

Folkman, ; Folkman & Lazarus, ; Lazarus & Folkman,

; Smith & Cohen,

, ,

b

+

./ + ,**1

,**/

-0

0

+33- +33- +33-

+33-

+313

+32. +32/ +32.

+33+ +33-

,*** ,**-

,**1 ,*** ,**- ,**1

,**0 ,**,

� �������� �������� ��� ���������� ! "

#$% #&'$#�( � )*+��,-.,/0123�-�4$�&5�1&67 � 89

:,-.,23�-�;<=>?7 � �94$@AB) #�C�8DE=>��F5&'�(

� �����)GH��IJ�87 K L7

K

L 1M7 >&N�,-.,/0123�-�9�����

���O:P)GH��IJ�QRS'I T������AB K

L ) #� K U VWX L7 � �Y�Z[)>$$\]S'

I�����AB)^ �� K !X L7 _ 1`a b�`��cd = #&'$e

Ifg�AB) #� 1M�F5&'�( � �����)GH��IJ�7 fg� T�

�����AB) #�hi7 9:`a=8^ ��C��=e1#j�k1l �mnop'$

#�1M7 mn� q[�rsS'$#� K !X X X X L( ; 7 � ��t

uvw��`��cd=87 � ������� ��xu�w�vyz�w�) {� ��

C�1n7 � �9��w��4$cd�|J&'$eI( 567 } K L � ~`a b

��tu�w��8 ��4��I�7 ��4��I� 1M�l �op'$�?7 �� K L �l

�%7 �� �1n1�I?7 '1n1�I?4I� 1M�l �op'$#�( C'&�l

8 ����)GH�� K L7 �

�,-.,w�)GH�� K

L 1M7 ,-.,w��r��4$^ �B

��#� ��l � � �4$#�( �����cd=87 C� q�94$mn�`���

�&'$�?7 ����������)� ���� ���'$eI( cd= #�9:,-

.,�����AB%@ �7 ����������)� 47 \]S'I%�=>�( C'&�

C��&7 cd=87 � �����)GH��IJ�7 9:,-.,�����AB) #�(

� ),-.,/01���4$�&57 � �9���� v������� ����

�` �)��4Icd ���J$ &'$#�IJ7 p¡7 �� ����������

�� ����` 4$#��M������C�) cd� ����( �� 7 >�#8

����������� ����` 4$#����1&7 ¢£�¤¥) $�C��=e�(

� )¦§ ¨�=>����©M7 � ��� ����ª�«#( � ��tuvw�

�`�� K L �cd��v7 ¬_­)��I�®�`��

K L =87 ¦§ ¨�=>����©M,-.,w���#C��&'$#�C�

�&7 ¯°�¤¥�]? �( mn�hi7 � 87 %8v7 ��I`a)±? �C��=e

1#C�)² 4$�?7 ��-³�0jDE1��=>��F5&'�( ;´��7 C���1

��-³�0jDE1��=87 q)µ¶4���·���tu����1 8,-.,w�

)¸¹S�7 º�7 q)»¼4�������1 8,-.,w�)½ S��7 �#�cd

��1S'$#� K

� � �

� � �

� �

� �� � �

� �� �� �

� �� � �

� �

� � �

� � � ��

� � � �

� �

� � � �

� � � �

� �

� � �

� � �

� �

� � �

� � �

� � � �

� �

!

� �"

� �" �

125

COPE Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, Ways of

Coping Questionnaire WCQ : Folkman & Lazarus, , , ; Folkman, Lazarus, Dun-

kel-Schetter, DeLongis, & Gruen,

coping scales with broad ap-

plicability ; Mearns,

b

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Radlo ,

Hopkins Symptom Checklist Derogatis, Lipman, Richels, Uhlen-

huth, & Covi, ; Derogatis, Richels, & Rock,

Smith & Cohen Meuser & Marwit

Compas, Makarne, & Fondacaro, ; Forsythe & Compas, ; Masel,

+323

+32* +32/ +322

+320

+331 +33+

,**/

,*** ,**+ ,**. ,**1

,***

+33-

# +311

+31. +310

+33-

+333 ,***

+322 +321

����� � � �

�� ��������� � ���������� !"#�$%

�& '(�)�� *�+�, -./�0'12� � ��3 !"#�$%"# �

�%)�� *�+�, -./' 456%�78��% ��9:;< = � �>?�@

AB!��% CD�9:�<8� EF G��HIJKL��MNO �"P�� , -./�

0'Q%R S@78��% >?5;��R S@7 � �T U�V#

WXYZ[YHIJKL\�]^ '� �W$%HIJKL^ �!�& R 56%��

#�_`$%Ta�� � bc�6%��d �W!� efg�hi!T e5;� >?

� -�j���kl� el�!� el�; el�W!�� a m!Tno� pq�

el�rs /�tu�v w�v $%"#to!T xy-�;� hz�bc!T�

� el�{|}qT+� ~�I^ ^ � WXYZ[YHIJKL\ ^ �*���

�^ �W!�� �� �W$% /�!�� A -�� 6�8% /56%��#��� �6�8

%�� �6�8��� � 5 u}q� �6�8�����!T el�;*� ���T

]^ ;� 5�8��T *���� WXYZ[YHIJKL\ ^ ��!�� �

el' �6�8%� �3 !T �� ~�I^ ;� � - �-HIJKL\56%

�^ �� l'��!T@�56% 8�� �� ��K���!TV ���

�� !T� = � �^ �;� ' �6�8�� �3 !T

��� � ���T�� � ��d� ��d�W��� ��� ¡� ¢ w�"%

fg�hi!T £3 l �#¤� � bc�� fgl �¥¦� §@¨���

bc' ©56PT ©ª =«S � ¬S � ­ ®� ¯ ®�

° ± �� ²�ª =«S � ¬S � ­ ®� ¯ ®� °

± �� ³ � UW��!T

¢ w;X� ³�- ´�� ��$%µ -^ ��C¶�\���·¸}���T

�� �]\��!�;� ¹ºp5�� §@¨��PT� bc�{|}qT+� � +

���"#�78� V !T��¨��3 �»aT 5;� ��§¼A½ �,�y��$

�� � � �

� �

� � � �

� � �

� � � � � �

� � � �

� � � � �

� � � �� � �

�� � � � �

�� � � �

� � � � �

� � �� �

� ! � �

� " � # $

� % & � '

( � � "

� )� * +

, " � � � �

� - - � � � . �/ 0

1 2 3 � � � . �/ 0 1

2 � �

+ 4 5 � � �

� �

' "

� �

����

������

� �

���

��

126

- ( )

Terry, & Gribble,

COPE, WCQ

WCQ

.

. .

.

./ + ,**1

+330

,**/

+*

+0 -.

,

-. +**

0

,**, +* +

012 +1+

,0/ 3/ +1* +3 +2 +2 ,-

+ -, ,., 3- +.3 +3 */ +2 ,-

* 31 /*1

� ������ �� ���� ��� ��������� �

�� �� !" �#$�%&�' () * +,$-&(.�) -&(.�) /0-&(.

�) -&(.1234 5 67) 0!"

� �8��9 2' � :;� ) � �< =1�� >?) @AB1=C!�

:;�8��� DE 2F=1GH6I&3!"� �< =1�� >?() J�>?� K

LMN5� 67!A�5) KL ( KL0&OP0) � �QR(� �=1ST.

5�>?�� 67!"

� �U�� 0&VW X��Y 0!" Z' ( 1��

[\][ �9^_) `�aH0! b� 0!c) &Adefg�h�!i) b� 0!

c) VW5-�jC!i) b� 0!c) < 2kljC!i) b� 0!c) m I23

jC!i � ' 5-C!" �n3oF� �,�VW X�� �n30!"

� �� �� � + p p 4 �Uq[\][�� ��r � 3!" r (

stuvw8x�� ��) yzuvw8x�� ��) {|}~��� ��� B��Nr

� ��k� 1=�6I&3�" stuvw8x�� ��( + ' 4 Uq8x5��![

\][��2���\�U0&) �� �J�8x���0) ,�,38x� k� ��

�� �� �5-� + ��) ���k� $ ��0!) �� � ���,��0

!4) � ��5(� ���8x��� J����� �� 5-�) ��1I�" y

zuvw8x�� �� + ' 4 (J�,�28x� � ���,�2�� �� �5

-� + ��) �023,��0!) ����`�0!4) � ��5(� ����� � �

,����� �� �5-�) ��1I�" {|}~��� �� + ' 4 ([\][�

�2���\� �7�) c?�{|�����B,�2�� �� �5-� + ��) �

��H��_� 7!) ��023,��0!4"   ¡¢ ¡(� + p 4 �,C&£

6I&3� +� p ¤¥4"

� [\][ � 8 + 4 �� ¦§� [\][�¨ r ��m) [\][

�r � 3!" r (© � ' + �B) ª) �4) � � ' +©

« ) ¬_kA�4) ­® � ' +� ¯:°�± ²) ­® ³4 �,C&G

H6I&3� + 8p 4" ´µ���� ¶R¡(·®5© � ¸ ) �

� ¸ ) ­® � ¸ 5-C!"

¹ ³ º »¼ + 4 �,C& 6I! + 4 ��

¹ ³r �½ 0!" r ( ' =12�) ¢ ¡  ¡�£ 6I&3� +º

»¼p 4" 2�) ´µ���� ¶R¡( ¸ 5-C!"

� ���� � ���

� �

� �

� �� � � �� � � �

� � � � �

�� � � �

���� � ���� �

�� �� � � �

� � � � �

� �� � ��

� � � � �

� � �

� !"

#$ % & � � '

� � ( #$

� ) * #$

% ' � � � +

#$ �

, #$ %

- . /

�� 0 1 2 � � � 0

� � � � 30 � 4 5 6 �� 3�0 �

3� 7 �0 � 8 39 �:;

1 � <� 30 �� 3�0

�0

= >? 2

= � � � � � / . �

� <�

127

:

: Lazarus

:

a

:

.

. .

: Rusell, Peplau, & Cutrona

UCLA

.

+

.

- *

+

+ +

.

,*** ,**- ,**1

-

+0

+*

2

,*** ,**-

,**.

+33-

+/ +*

+*

+33- 3-

21 21

+32- +32*

,*

+32- 3,

a

a a

a

�������� � � �

� � � �

� � � � � � � �

� � � � � � � �

� � � � � � � �

� � � � � � � �

� � �� �

� � ��

��� ����� ����� ! �"#$��%� &'()� *+,-./012 � �

345� ��6789:34;<=>&'? @ABCD2 � E�FGH2 � 3

4I'? JK� LMNOPNQRSTUV� ��KL&W� ��X�YZ&'�� ! �"#

$��%� [\� �]I'? ^-()� ^_`_-��2aZb_'��Kcdefgh�

i&� jk � l � <mno()8pq_' ? E�FGH2rstuvwxQRSTU �

� yztuvwxQRSTU � � X{|}5QRSTU � 34I'?

2H~� ����~-������ QRSTU-��,� ����34;? �����<

QRSTU-H�� ���������;'�K� H� ������<&' � -���� �

!���&' ? ^-()� ����� � � �� l � �� rstuvwxQRSTU

� � �� l � � K�fW����-$�)8�q_'? �o��� ��f�<��&W�

 �-¡¢8�����-p£� rstuvwxQRSTU-¤¥¦�8ef§<8¨q©KoI

'? �'� X{|}5QRSTUK�fW+ªo«¬­¥8�q_' � � �� l � �? �

o��� � �K�fW� ®H¯5°H-¡¢8rstuvwxQRSTU-¤¥¦�8ef§<

8¨q©KoI'?

2������¯±QRSTU<��²-³´�µ¶Kw�;·�<-AD¸wx¹�

( )

���������

����� ����������������

128

- ( )

Form ofValues DRD group UL group Sex break-up Interaction

Women Men Women Men( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

CA ***

PRC *

NRC

PC ** **

* . ** . *** .

Note. Standard deviations are in parentheses. DRD dating relationship dissolution, UL unrequited

love, CA cognitive appraisal (threat/loss), PRC positive relationship-oriented coping, NRC nega-

tive relationship-oriented coping, PC postponed-solution coping.

. .

. . .

promax

. . .

Table

, . .

, . .

, . .

Table

Table Means and standard deviations for cognitive appraisal and coping behavior

by sex and form of break-up

F F FN N N N

p p p

F p

F p

F p

,

-

./ + ,**1

3/ +1* 3- +.3

04-. /40* .4.0 .4., +42. ,2401 +4./

-4.* -4,* ,42. ,421

+243. +14-1 +04,0 +04.* *42, /4-1 +4+3

14-0 34+, 142, 34*/

04+/ 04// /41+ 04++ *422 +4*1 *4*+

.431 .4.2 .4++ /4./

+-4*- +*4*, ++4/3 ++4.2 *4*+ 142+ 34*3

/4/3 04.. /4,. /4-.

*/ *+ **+

. , .2 * 02

* .2 + /* *3 13

-. -

,*** ,**-

20 13 2,

+

, ,

+ /*. ,2 01 **+

+ /*. / -1 */

+ /*. 1 2+ *+

,

+

a

a

a a

��������� ���������������������� !"# $

%

& & & & & &

' ' '

( ((

( ( (( (

)*+,�-./�� ��01������23�45����� 678�+9�:;:

��<=: �� �: �����: �� ��>?@?������AB��CDEFG6H

IJK: ���LMNO�PQRS: TUV: ���WXYWZ�6[\JK�*+]^�_P`

ab6cd+ / -e;: ��<=: -e�� �: -e�����:

-eCDEFG6fg*+/ h�: �� �: �����: CDEFGeijkNO�lm�J

n*+k6Fo+ p 6qr*+s/ �tu�vwJK��ou: -e

�� �� k�: -e������ k�xy-.d+/ -e: PQRS p

p s( z ' s ��ou�{CDEFG� k�xy-.d+/ �ke: k

�xy-. ���|\lP`}K p s: �01: _~�}K p s: k-./

PQRS��*u: �� �: ������}�����: ������}�����NOx

yh��|\lP`}K:����������NOxyh��|\lP`}K�{O?+/�+:

�� ��������}������CDEFG�xy-.d+/ >�-: �� ���

�k6�d+��������WXYWZ�����������P`��6�9+��

� : �� ������o����ou�{: ������}�����ePQRS��*ux

yh����6)*u�� p ( z ' s: ������}���������o��: PQR

S� o���ION�¡?+ p s/

TUV��*ue: ;NOxyh��|\lP`}K: ������}�����NOxyh�

�|\lP`}K�{O?+�: � kexy-ehNd+/ ���WXYWZ��>?

@?�¢£¤¥��ou: �� �: ������}�����NOxyh��|\lP`}K

�{O?+�: � kexy-ehNd+/ �+: ¦§Z���ou�{: ������

}�����NOxyh��|\lP`}K�{O?+/

129

a a a a a a

CA Time Loneliness Psychological Distress

Em C/B Ph

CA *** * *** *** **

PRC *** ** *** *

NRC *** ** *** *** *** ***

PC *** * * *

* . ** . *** .

Note. a Zeroth-order correlations between psychological adjustment and NRC score

after square root transformation. CA cognitive appraisal (threat/loss), PRC

positive relationship-oriented coping, NRC negative relationship-oriented coping, PC

postponed-solution coping. Time a period of grieving, Em emotional response,

C/B cognitive/behavioral response, Ph physical response.

Step Step Step Step

Aiken & West, Step

Step Step

, . . Table

Step

. .

Figure

Step

Step

Table Zeroth-order correlations between cognitive appraisal and cop-

ing behavior and psychological adjustment

p p p

F F F

p F F

R F

SD

p

F

F

.

/

4,- 4*3 4,. 4+3 4+,

4-. 4+- 4*0 4+3 4*3 4*1

4,+ 4+, 4-+ 4,1 4-- 4-+

4,- 4+, 4,3 4,1 4-, 4,3

4*2 4+1 4+* 4*2 4*3 4*3

*/ *+ **+

+ , -

.

+33+ ,

- .

- .31 / 3, **+ -

+

,2 *+

+

.

.

,

b

b

D D D

D D

D

D

D

� � � ��

� � � � �

� � � � �� � � � �� � � � � �

� � � � � � � � � �

� � �� � � �

� � �� � �

� � ��

�� �������������� ����� !"��#$% ���&' (�)

*+�,-.+/� 0123456789:;�<=>?%@�/� !"�)ABAC�

DEFG 789:;�<=>?%@�/�%HIJKLM�N OP��/Q !"�����

RSTU.+�VKLWX�YUZ[A\]WX^�L�N _��V `���aH.+b�c�

de��^fg��$Lhi�.+/��.+N !"����K�+���jkLlL A m

nKopL�"56% qWX^��Jr$J)*+N st � � K�Xu �"56)A v

w�xyHz*M� {|Lr�}L~�Lr%wIX+�\]�^�+N opL�"56%

q�^��!"��M^��A/��$L��}L�08���$/�����^�+N��

/$���"56 �K}L~�A �"56f��56)A�$/��)kL�56)*

!"�K�M^ ��AjkL&' (��L+�h�IX+N _��V !"�)A _��$

h i

������ ��� ��� �����

a

b

Predictors Time Loneliness Psychological Distress

Em C/B Ph

Step

Sex ***

Form

Step

CA * ** ** *

Step

PRS * *

NRS * *** *** *** ***

PC ***

Step

CA PRC

CA NRC *

CA PC

( ) *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** ***

* . ** . *** .

Note. a men, women, b dating relationship dissolution group, unrequited love group.

DRD dating relationship dissolution, UL unrequited love, CA cognitive appraisal(threat/loss),

PRC positive relationship-oriented strategies, NRC negative relationship-oriented strategies, PC

postponed-solution coping. Time a period of grieving, Em emotional response, C/B cognitive/

behavioral response, Ph physical response.

Table Standardized beta values for hierarchical multiple-regression analysis pre-

dicting subject well-being from sex, form of break-up, cognitive appraisal, and

coping behavior.

R R

F

p p p

+

4*3 4,. 4*- 4*/ 4*+

4*, 4*3 4*1 4*2 4*-

,

4++ 4*/ 4+0 4+. 4+,

-

4+- 4*, 4+, 4*+ 4*-

4+- 4,3 4,, 4-+ 4,2

4,+ 4*- 4*, 4*- 4*0

.

4*-

4,.

4*2

4., 4+2 4.+ 4+1 4-/ 4+, 4-2 4+. 4-, 4+*

/43, +*4/2 +-42* +/4+- ++4/2

*/ *+ **+

+ , + ,

-

+33-

,

D

��j������� � � �?

130

- ( )./ + ,**1

� �������� �������� ������������� !" #

$%&'()*+, � -.�/0123

4�5'()6�27������89, �

$:;, 4<=>?@A�����'B)C

DE1��FGHI�J KIH�K�LH,

MNOPQ, RS1O�TUV0, � 'B

)%& W�PX��V, 4<=>?@

A�����'B)CDE12�PQ$1Y

Z[LJ

\, � ]^, �� , �����'

_`ab�V2cd�efghi�jkL

H,\,� ]^'lmV2�n�� ,

������� ��������@oV0

1�K��`HL�$p2J q�, %& W

�rst=>?@A�����Q, � ��

������uV0st=>?�vEV, w

xyz)�����Q4<=>?�vE��

K��`HL�$p2J

y�{|2B[�, � QX)}I2~��PQX��, � �����p0Qe�$��PX

), ��B[$���� ��������^�@oV01��L����K�Q���X�K�

PX�J ��������LH1D�L����$�I01�n��, �� r������

1p2�����'X02��Q�70�$1J ���Q, � , X�1Q, ��$@A���1

[��h���10, �� r����������������uV0e�$ab�$)[

�K�' ¡V2���10��X����FGHI�J

�� ��������@APQ, � ��¢£r¤��@��

¥ ¦ r, §��'�p2¨©�@�� ¥ ¦ ���ª«LH, �

'%& W�PX����¬�, � ��������^�­®PX�, �¯°V2J

�� Q�|0�������±²�³�$´�µ@' V, � '%& W�PX����

¬�, ����������^�­®PX�¶·�¸HI, ¯_Q¹º�I2J VLV, ����

������u����»Q¼D, � '%& W�PX��1[� �, �������^�½

D@oV01�K�' �jkQ/HI$Lp2J

� �����Q, \, � ]^, �� ���'lmV2�n, � �

� �

� �

� �

� � �

��������� ��������

���

�����

�����

131

Figure . Interaction e ect of negative rela-

tionship-oriented coping and cog-

nitive appraisal (threat/loss) on re-

covery from the break-up.

Smith & Co-

hen Meuser & Marwit

+ #

+33- +333 ,***

����� � � �

�� ��� ��� ����� ��� ����� !"#� $%&'()

��� �*�+,-� ���./�) 01-!2�� 3 � $%&'(�4565�

�� �*�+,���789� ��: ;<=>�?:�@A�-B .?:!

9 ��� �*�+,9CD�� ;< �?:� .?:! 9� �*�+,)

�� �EF��� GH� 4565�$%&'( � ��� �*�+,��� I-J��

KL .�

9 2��7<MN /�)8O!�+P8QN� RSTU

V�7$%&'(9� 4�?:!+P- W5��./�<XY���.-Z11"0[� 2�

\]���7<^�1_`�?:� . a8Q.� 4��b� RSTUV�7$%&'(<

�.cd� �ef10� �<gh1i� -?. j- W5`k./�8� ��

��� ��� �<lmWi.� � n��� �ef10� �� o?p� ����

� �-���9� RSTUV�7$%&'(�q )r�cd� �)gs� � ��

��� �)r�� ��:tu) 05�)4�vw 9xs� � �-���9 y!� I9

z05!12��

RSTUV�7$%&'(9� {|-9 2�\]8Q}:�Z� �!tpJO<J!~�b

?:� ./�-?2�� � �<�s��1� �� 4�tu� RSTUV�7$%&'(��

��- y!��� I)z05!12�� IZK�:.� �1�!)0� RSTUV�7

$%&'(�� �*�+,��� I9x�Z�8Q2�� ��� �-ok.� !�7 �

-� .��89� RSTUV�7$%&'(- .�K�05. ���!B 9�

���� � #�z��s� ���.�� �W5��. � ��� �� �� ��

��-o��Z� �� � �RSTUV�7$%&'(�- y!��)z05�oN� RS

TUV�7$%&'(9� ��*�+,?NZ� ���� � ����TUV! X�

���� I)���K�05��.� ��� � � I)Q}:�

��TUV�7$%&'(9� �f<@A�- k?:� .

a8Q.� �-� ;< .?:! 9� 4���� �*�+,) �8Q.�EF

��� �1�� tu89� ��TUV�7$%&'(�� �� � ����� ���

��-����)z05��

��TUV�7$%&'(9� � <�!�?:-�� � ��f<C¡-��  !d�¢ )£

�oN� �f< k�N� ¤¥��N ./�8� @A�-o¦���7<§ Wi?:�

. 8Q.� �1�� |¨-9� ©��79 8- ����.� ����ª2�+P-Z

11"0[� �f< k?:� .B«9� ©��7� Q.�9� �f-\ .¬­<

y .�89!�®}:1� ¯° ±� o?p� ²³L10� ´µ � � 9� 2�\]

<@A�- k?:� .B«� ¶-9� 2�\]-\ .��¬­� · ��)z05.�

�¸¹��.� /50<º» .¼%½9z05!�)� �f-\ .��¬­-?2��

�� � � ��

� � �

� � � �

�� � � � ��

� � � �� � �

�� �

�� �

� � � �

� � � �

� ��� � �

� � � �

� !

� � " #

$ %& �

� ' ( ) *

+ �

� � ,

- . /�

�� � � �� � �

+ � � �

0 1

� 2

�� 3 # #

� 3

4 5 6 7

� 8 9

���������

���������

132

- ( )

;

./ + ,**1

+33, ,***

+313

� ������ �� ������ ��� ���������� �

!" �� "#$��%&'( )*+,-./ ����0( 1"2 �� �34

560789( � �34 1�:;8( �<=�> ? %��"@�ABC854���

DE��FG&H�I J�KL( )*+,-./ �����2 MN( � O<PO �Q

R S��T� .�U&HK�VFG&H�I

���. WD0( � �X��YZ [��\]�^3_`( )*+,-./ ��

��" 3�ab( � A&�2 MN�cd%eKI 8A8%�&( � O<PO �QR

SD0( J�54%. W0U&H%AeKI f�( �����#$gh"iLKj � D

E94I

kl( �( mn+,-./ ����( )*+,-./ �����JHoH� p0

� ���q�)*+,-�r 8l3�s�� &A�%eK�( J��� 0)*+,-.

/ �����tVu3V�DEeKI � �.��vw xD0%3�( XyO<PO ���

�vwD0( mn+,-./ ����"#$8Kzy0( J�{ "|}8l3�~��A&�

�� �kH( ��A&�����> �m�<�^d%��( )*+,-./ ����"#

$8Kzy0~��A& �� �kH( ��A&�����> �m�<��d%�s�( �

K( s48K����> �m�<���0( R S���"��8l3�s����kHl3�

�� � �I s�s�A&( � ����3lV( � !�X��)*+,-%q]0( ��

A& �� �kH( J���( ��A&���%�m�<���8( � ��� ���

q"k&���k�K( �34? W�FG&H�I J�KL( )*+,-./ �����#$

0( � ��� ���q�tV)*+,-�r 8K ��%eK�FG&H�I

BC��6 ����0�����" G54� �A���D0%

d( � !"� 8( �N�BC���" ¡54% DE�I J�g D0( 1"2 �

� DE��FG&H�Is�54% 0(� ��� ���q� ¢DE��£�8KI

BC��6 ����0� ���¤ ¥ � � .�U&H( �(2 MN��./D0(

�Q ���� " ¦8K�V( 2 MN"§¨�� g%�� �U&HKI sH

&�s�A&( £©0��7ª«¬kHK�FG&H�I

vw����tV­ % 10( �N%® "F � Hl3%3s�DE�I vw0(

� ������ ����. W"j����¯vwDE�KL( �°l� p" ��

±�8K²�%vw�%eKI 8A8( � �X�� ���� Q� �5���0�N�

�V� ���s��³±kH�I �´�( � 8K�M0zy�5elµ%6( ±���� �

¶�DE�? WV( � �p "·l3�? WVE�I J�KL( J�N( ¸ 8K�³±k

H� ����0 ¹º��5elµ%�? W�E�I �K( � ��±�����N» �

Hl3�ab( �´��{8K �����2 8K ������ ¼�½�d%��³±k

� � � � � �

� � � � �

� � � �

� �

� � � �

� � � � �

� � ��

� � �

� � � �

� �

� �

� � �

� � � �

� � � �

� �

� � � � �

� � � � �

� � ! "

� � � # $ �

% � & ' ( %

� � � � )

� � �

� � �

� � * � �

+ � � ,

, -

��������

� ���

133

a,**,

�������� � � �

�� � � �� ������������ !" #$��%&��'( �%& )*�+�, ,�� � � �� �������-./012�345 67)*��� 8��9:';(,�� � � �� <=.)* >? @ �A� BC.)* DEFGH�

I J KLMNOPQ8R� NS�T <=.-UQVWXYNZT [\]^Q/_NZ� K`

�abcdeI J <=-UQVWXY K`�fghij bT k.lmQn`M5op�

qrT s]^tQou� vw.OP �<=xey6T j 4fyz{|54 s]^tQ}~�

`� .x�T s]^tm.OP �<=Q|�MT ��x3T kIxe1�.-UQ|54 � Q

��� NS��Z��.s]^tb��� � �a.OPhbj J �NT <=MNs]^t

��M5[\]^Q��� K`fT s]^t.����� OP.�xT <=� -UQ!"t

b�G����� K`b���j NST��.-�`��bxx `4_NOPij J��T

<=���G�`)*� ¡`.�¢2Q£¤� ¥�T <=���G�.-��|¦�� §¨

Qc©�ªIN!"«Q£¬� �bj `­®I J

������

��

134

- ( )

Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( ). Newbury Park :

Sage.

Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub, J.K. ( ). Assessing coping strategies : A theoretically based

approach. , .

Compas, B.E., Forsythe, C. J., & Wagner, B.M. ( ). Consistency and variadility in causal attributions and

coping with stress. , .

Derogatis, L.R., Lipman, R.S., Richels, K., Uhlenhuth, E.H., & Covi, L. ( ). The Hopkins Symptom

Checklist (HSCL) : A self-report symptom inventory. , .

Derogatis, L.R., Richels, K., & Rock, A.F. ( ). The SCL- and the MMPI : A step in the validation of a

new self-report scale. , .

Folkman, S. ( ). Personal control and stress and coping processes : A theoretical analysis.

, .

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. ( ). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample.

, .

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. ( ). If it changes it must be a process : Study of emotion and coping during

three stages of a college examination. , .

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. ( ). Palo Alto, CA :

Consulting Psychologists Press.

Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. ( ). The dynamics of a

stressful encounter. , .

Forsythe, C. J., & Compas, B.E. ( ). Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping :

Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis. , .

Frazier, P.A., & Cook, S.W. ( ). Correlates of distress following heterosexual relationship dissolution.

, .

Harvey, J.H., & Hansen, A.M. ( ). Loss and bereavement in close romantic relationships. In C. Hendrick,

& S.S. Hendrick (Eds.)., California : Sage Publications. Pp. .

.

.

Pp. .

Horowitz, Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. ( ). Impact of Event Scale : A measure of subjective stress.

, .

Kaczmarek, M.G., & Backlund, B.A. ( ). Disenfranchised grief : The loss of an adolescent romantic

Multiple regression : Testing and interpreting interactions.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

Cognitive Therapy and Research,

Behavioral Science,

British Journal of Psychiatry,

Journal of

Personality and Social Psychology,

Journal of

Health and Social Behavior,

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

Cognitive Therapy and Resaerch,

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,

Close relationships : A sourcebook.

Psychosomatic Medicine,

./ + ,**1

+33+

+323

,01 ,2-

+322

-*/ -,*

+31.

+ +/

+310 3*

,2* ,23

+32.

2-3 2/,

+32*

,+3 ,-3

+32/

+/* +1*

+322

+320

33, +**-

+321

.1- .2/

+33-

// 01

,***

-/3 -1*

+323 .1 //

+33, /0 ,-+

+331 ,*/ ,+2

+313

,*3 ,+2

+33+

/0

+,

+3

+,2

.0

,+

.2

/*

++

+*

.0

.+

� ������ �� ������ ��� ���������� �

� � !" #$% &'()*( ����+ �,- ./� $012 2� � !" &'()*(34�56 ./� $012 2� � !" &'()*(34����789:, � ; <=78� $012 2� � !" &'()*( �����>?���� @A2 > B ������ CD� $8

E F#8 G2� � !" &'()*( ����+ �HIJ K�56 ' 1 LM$N#$' $8!2 2

� � !" &'()*( ����+ # OP Q R S T U VW! ()*((X�YZ[\]^_ < ./`

� � !" ab cd�e� ����fg� h � $ 2 2� � !" � ()*( �����ijCD��L K�56 78� $012 2� � !" kl>m����&'()*( �����()*( �nom��()*(pYqLrn

#$'st$uv01wx 2 2� � !" &'()*(34����&'()*( ���� yz{|}`

~� �� !" � �&��&�� �&� Kn&�� � � ! �L����01 !n CD� $8E F� #8 G2

� M�O !" � A�L��01 ! n� A+ �U K J K�5 n <=78�$012 2

�� !" ����t$ �[��(7

��� ��� ��� !" � �=�� ������ � #$./$ 01x 2 2

�� �� !" & ¡�n ¢£�¤¥��n¦§¨©

L ªI !" #$% ()*(ab �+ �«¬n)­�(®_|¯yYq °�±�²n³ #$#$N ´ µ01t 2 2

¶· !" z¸¹ºzY»�¼�HI ° � ½ $2 2

� � � � � �

� � � �� �� � �� � � � �

����� � � �� �

� � � � � � � ��� �

� � ��� � � ��� � � �� !" #� �$� %& � ' ( ' �

� � ) ����

� * + , , � - � .�

/ �

0 1 2� � 3 4 5 #

$ 6

7 � � � � 8 9:; � 3�

<= 8 ' >

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

� � �

� �

� �

135

relationship. , .

.

.

a .

b

.

.

a

Pp. .

b .

.

.

COPE

.

Kirsch, I., Mearns, J., & Catanzaro, S. J. ( ). Mood regulation expectancies as determinants of depression

in college students. , .

.

Lazarus, R.S. ( ). Coping theory and research : Past, present, and future. ,

.

Lazarus, R.S. ( ). New York : Springer Publishing Company.

Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. ( ). New York : Springer Publishing Compa-

ny.

Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. ( ). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping.

, .

Masel, C.N., Terry, D. J., & Gribble, M. ( ). The e ects of coping on adjustment : Re-examining the

goodness of fit model of coping e ectiveness. , .

Mearns, J. ( ). Coping with a breakup : Negative mood regulation expectancies and depression

following the end of a romantic relationship. , .

Meuser, T.M., & Marwit, S. J. ( ). An integrative model of personality, coping and appraisal for the

prediction of grief involvement in adults. , .

.

Olsson, U. ( ). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coe cient.

, .

.

Radlo , L.S. ( ). The CES-D scale : A Self-report Depression Scale for research in the general popula-

tion. , .

Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., & Cutrona, C.E. ( ). The revised UCLA loneliness scale : Concurrent and

discriminant validity evidence. , .

.

Smith, H.S., & Cohen, L.H. ( ). Self-complexity and reactions to a relationship breakup.

, .

Sorenson, K.A., Russell, S.M., Harkness, D. J., & Harvey, J.H. ( ). Account-making, confiding, and coping

with the ending of a close relationship. , .

Adolescence,

Journal of Counseling Psychology,

Psychosomatic Medicine,

Stress and emotion : A new synthesis.

Stress, appraisal, and coping.

European

Journal of Personality,

Anxiety, Stress, and Coping,

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

OMEGA,

Psychometrika,

Applied Psychological Measurement,

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

Journal of Social

and Clinical Psychology,

Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,

,/- ,/3

,*** ,,/ ,-.

,**+ ,3/ -*.

,**, +.1 +/.

,**,

+/ ,*, ,*-

,**-

/0 1,

,**.

+32 ,*,

,**. ,,/ ,.*

,**/ +1+ +2*

,**0

++3 +,2

,**1

+331

+ +* 2.

+33*

-*0 -+,

+32-

33 +*2

+33-

,-. ,.1

+333

+32.

+321

+.+ +03

+330 #

# ,13 -**

+33-

+33+

-,1 --.

+333 ,***

-1/ -3-

+33+ ++1

+,0

+313

+313 $

..- .0*

+33-

3/ ++.

# +311

-2/ .*+

+32*

.1, .2*

+33* .+ /+

+33-

-01 -2.

+33-

1- 20

,0

.2

.3

.+

/,

.1

,*

.

-1

,,

//

+

3

0*

.*

-3

..

+

+

-3

-.

+,

2

�������� � � �

�� � � �� �������������� !"#$%&'����(� !)*+,-."����/0�12�34,�5��67�89: :

��";<=>? @ABC��DEFGHIJKL(M: N���D�� OPKLQ R�": @STM�UVW$XYZCD2: [V;?: ST"�\]^_XYZCD2: ABC��D`abcdMefKLQR�DghKi;V �j�: �� k89l?mnXop: (nXq_;"K: ��`r?s�tnXuvUVLw�=>"UV�

� �: xy � � Xz{M: |}S��~X�;i��}�X �LD: ���f�D�2cL�������������������D��: N�}�D��i;VLw ��� �: ����X ;:��: }�}�X �L� N�f�: \ ¡� � � �¢ : �: -�£¤� � � �¢ : �:��`r�£¤� � � �¢ : � ?¥^lC�: f�M¦C§?¨2cC1�L���������������X����KL�X�;:�E�©ª«}�X �LD:N�f�?¬­���R�l[�L�}��®n? ¯, ¯ °: ¯, ¯ °: ¯, ¯ °: ¯,¯ °l[V �mn?±²: (n?�������

���

136

- ( )

.

Olsson

.

, . , .

, .

Low Low Low High High Low High High

F n.s. F n.s.

F n.s.

./ + ,**1

,***

-2 .3

+

+331

, +313 +33*

- * 10

+ /*. * ,+ + /*. + 1+

+ /*. * *+

.

/ -1 ,* +3

,,

.*

��������� ���������������������� !"# $

% &

137

The e ects of cognitive appraisal (extent of threat/loss) and of coping behavior

on well-being after heart break were examined. Five hundred and seven undergrad-

uate students completed measures of threat, coping behavior, and subjective well-

being (a period of grieving, a feel of loneliness, and distress). Multiple regression

analysis suggested that negative relationship oriented coping (e.g., you painted

rejecter in lurid colors.) associated negatively with well-being and that postponed

coping(e.g., you let break-up take its own course) associated with faster recovery

from grieving even after the e ects of sex, form of broken heart (dating relation-

ship dissolution or unrequited love). Moreover, the e ect of negative relationship-

oriented coping on recovery from, was found of to be moderated by the perceived

threat/loss of the breakup.

Tsukasa KATO

Abstract

E ects of cognitive appraisal and coping with broken

hearts on psychological adjustment after break-up

#

#

#

#

�������� � � �

138

- ( )./ + ,**1