UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

80
S.O.W. UW//LA issue#1 department of landscape architecture college of built environments university of washington Speaking Of Which

description

This is the first student organized collection of student work at the University of Washington, College of Built Environments, Department of Landscape Architecture.

Transcript of UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

Page 1: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

S.O.W.

UW//LAissue#1

department of landscape architecturecollege of built environments

university of washington

S p e a k i n g O f W h i c h

Page 2: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

© 2016 Department of Landscape Architecture College of Built Environments University of Washington

Page 3: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

table of contents

foreword

independent work

design/build

study abroad

500 studios

300 studios

afterword

1

53

13

3

19

35

69

Page 4: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1
Page 5: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

1 | foreword

forewordsowing success

Design education is much like sowing seeds. One prepares the soil, plants the seeds, and provides nutrients and water – giving the plants and plant community what they need to grow and thrive - and eventually disperse their own seeds into the world. Like tending a seed to maturity, once our students graduate from the program, they have what they need to begin their different career trajectories in the landscape architecture profession.

At the University of Washington, we take sowing seriously, both literally and figuratively. It begins with the diversity of our student body, building a program with a mix of students from multiple backgrounds, ranging from humanities and fine art to social and natural sciences, and from around the world, with a healthy mix of domestic and international students. This stringent but broad selection process builds a community that provides students diverse cultural and disciplinary perspectives to learn from.

Next, students navigate rigorous course work that takes advantage of our location in Seattle and the Pacific Northwest region. The Pacific Northwest is one of the most environmentally and socially progressive regions in the country, our location offers a rich array of design case studies and built projects for hands-on learning. In studios and other courses, students and faculty work with city agencies, community organizations, and practitioners on projects ranging from conceptual exploration to design implementation, some projects culminating in physical construction projects “in the dirt”.

Beyond the Pacific Northwest, we offer opportunities for students to participate in design/build or field design projects in Cambodia, Croatia, Italy, and Peru. Through

partnership with the Scan|Design Foundation, MLA students participate in the Scan|Design Travel Program to Denmark. Opportunities are also available for students to study abroad through the Valle Scholarship and Scandinavia Exchange Program. Students may also join UW Exploration Seminars that take students from a range of disciplines to explore remote places in Africa, Asia, South America, and beyond.

In their final year of study, BLA students participate in the Design/Build capstone program—a two-quarter process that takes students from community outreach and design concepts to construction documentation and construction of the project on site; MLA students have options for participating in a two-quarter long capstone studio, or pursuing individual theses or group projects, which this year range from urban archaeology in Seattle’s University District to a children’s refuge near Nairobi, Kenya.

This publication presents work from our students who took advantage of all the options and opportunities offered through our program and more, exploring other programs on campus, from digital art to global health. The landscape architecture program at University of Washington prepares the soil, sows seeds of experience and theory, and ultimately watches their students thrive and grow, dispersing their own ideas, and the values of the program, across a global discipline. As our students graduate from the University of Washington, it is our hope that they will begin to sow seeds of their own, impacting the profession and the design culture in the Pacific Northwest and beyond.

- Jeffrey Hou, PhD, ASLA, Professor & Chair

Page 6: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

The field of landscape architecture increasingly requires cross-cultural knowledge and international perspectives in the face of growing cultural diversity and transnational flow of people and ideas. Study abroad programs at UW enable students to acquire critical skills in working with diverse cultures and geographical contexts.

The department’s curriculum supports international exchange through programs abroad and collaboration with partner institutions overseas. Past and current programs include design/build studios in Bosnia, Cambodia, Croatia, Guatemala, Mexico, and Peru, summer field studios in Asia, quarter-long programs in Rome, and field trips to Denmark and Japan.

The following projects present work from the Summer 2015 Valle Scholar Program in Scandinavia and projects from the Autumn 2015 Rome Studio focused on the Tiber River as an urban waterbody and a cultural icon of the past, present and future.

study abroad

Page 7: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

study abroad

Page 8: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

JENNIE LI, MLA

In 2015 the Valle Foundation funded Jennie’s proposal to study urban agricultural projects in Scandinavia for the summer season. Jennie documented the alternative agricultural landscapes she encountered with plein air watercolors.

The culmination of Jennie’s studies in Scandinavia examined the diverse and comprehensive urban agricultural practices in Scandinavian countries.

ALTERNATIVE FOODSCAPESof Scandinavia - a journey in watercolor

Herligheten Allotment Gardens, Oslo, Norway. This community allotment garden, with over 100 beds, is a small pedestrian island within the middle of a construction zone along the waterfront development area Bjørvika.

Page 9: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

Vintervikens Trädgård Community Garden and Cafe, Stockholm, Sweden. A community urban agricultural space, Vintervikens acts as a setting for a very successful outdoor café. This model of attaching a business to a community garden is more common in Stockholm as a way of sustaining each organization.

5 | study abroad

Page 10: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

JENNIE LI, MLA, YEAR III .

ALTERNATIVE FOODSCAPESof Scandinavia - a journey in watercolor

Page 11: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

7 | study abroad

ØsterGro Rooftop Farm, Copenhagen, Denmark A rooftop farm located on top of an old car auction building that operates on a 40 member Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) weekly pick-up box model. ØsterGro captures its own water for irrigation.and mixes recycled brick roof tiles into its soil to lighten the load on the roof and aid water retention.

Page 12: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

THE ROME STUDIOurban connections to the tiber river

EVAN BOYD, MLAThe Tevere, also known as the Tiber River, was the focus of our study abroad program in Rome, Italy. Each evening, starlings fly in mesmerizing formations above the Tiber before they settle in the trees.This quick charcoal sketch was made standing on the Ponte Sisto, looking over the Tiber.

507 asks students to develop precedent studies as a means to explore the area where environmental design and art begin to merge. This course asked students to consider the meaning of their actions, how they reflect their own and often the communities’ values, and how each action

is carefully considered as a part of the whole. The projects in this studio are typically based on the competition model and the students are expected to structure their proposals with that in mind.

Page 13: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

9 | study abroad

KATIE POPPEL, MLA/MUPpast | present | future : ex Mira Lanza (Rome, Italy) overlay of (multiple) plans from the 19th Century. Stretched canvas, gel medium, and inkjet print. At the neighborhood scale, the ex-Mira Lanza industrial site is part of a larger system. Ex-Mira Lanza deepens the conceptual framework of post-industrial spaces adapting to a new mix of land uses; these sites focus on creating more space for the surrounding community residents and businesses. By imprinting the historic building footprints onto the site in their prior locations, ex Mira Lanza can be adapted for civic use, while the historic character is not abandoned.

Page 14: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

REBECCA CHRISTY, MLAThe plan view drawing shows the site of the proposed Museum of the Tevere, and focuses on the working river in the industrial neighborhood of Trastevere. The exhibits within the museum highlight the history of the Tevere as both an industrial water body and also acknowledges the flooding events, which continually shaped the urban fabric of the city.

Page 15: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

11 | study abroad

The building section (bottom) features the Museum of the Tevere with a courtyard for visitors that blends interior and exterior spaces. The underground cistern holds and transfers stormwater from the adjacent boulevard to the stormwater terrace system (top).

Page 16: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

In this program students are asked to consider design through the “application of building” and adapt their designs based on actual experience and scale. Students develop a balance between the conceptualizing and the making of their design and gain an understanding of the design process as circular, from idea, to building and back to idea.

The 2016 design/build studio created and constructed a therapeutic garden for veterans and their loved ones, visitors, and staff at the Puget Sound Veterans Administration Hospital (VA). This vulnerable population is incredibly diverse and complex in age, cultural background, and combat experiences. In addition to research that informed our design, we collaborated with occupational therapy students from Michigan, held interactive participatory sessions with stakeholders and community members at the VA, and listened to their stories through conversation and historic letters.

Design Goals:

1. Provide opportunities for reflection, relaxation, and mental restoration

2. Provide a safe and comfortable place to get away and be alone

3. Provide opportunities for therapy (horticultural, physical, psychological)

4. Provide opportunities to socialize

5. Foster a sense of belonging

Phase I: Stakeholder Meeting

Concept Development

Schematic Design

Phase II: Synthesis + Development of Design Elements

Final Design Graphics

Construction Documents

Phase III: Construction

In Phase I, the class split into 6 teams to come up with concepts and different schematic designs for the garden. In Phase II, our class came together to work on a single design with the Synthesis Team leading and small groups working on different elements. The final design combined the concept and elements of two of the six original concepts; the ‘Earth & Sky’ concept with the forms of the Inside-Out’ concept. The design portion took 10 weeks and construction of the project took 9 weeks, the whole project spanning two quarters.

design/build

Page 17: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

design/build

Page 18: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

DESIGN BUILD 2016puget sound veterans administration hospital courtyard

A final vignette for the project, by BLA Lyna Nget, illustrates the intended lush feel of the plantings - as well as the seating and walking opportunities provided by the design. Screens and seating are strategically placed in the spaces to provide optimal opportunities for outdoor respite.

The 2016 design/build studio created and constructed a therapeutic garden for veterans and their loved ones, visitors, and staff at the Puget Sound Veterans Administration Hospital (VA). This vulnerable population is incredibly diverse and complex in age, cultural background, and combat experiences. In addition to research to inform

our design, we collaborated with occupational therapy students from Michigan, held interactive participatory sessions with stakeholders and community members at the VA, and listened to their stories through conversation and historic letters.

Page 19: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

15 | independent work

An early conceptual sketch by BLA Lyna Nget, shows the different feelings and experiences provided by the ‘Sky Room’ concept. The ‘Sky Room’ is about openness, lightness and directing one’s view to the sky, which lends itself to a sense of escape, respite from one’s surroundings.

15 | design/build

Page 20: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

ABOVE: Early conceptual diagram of ‘Earth & Sky’ layout by Lyna Nget - showing circulation, planting, therapeutic use and visibility. RIGHT: On site construction process. These three photos show the construction process (all work done by the student design teams) going through the initial grading and placement of concrete and metal elements followed by hard-scaping and finally planting.

Page 21: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

PHOTOS: Post-construction photos show two views of the ‘Earth Room’ - during the planting process (top) and after planting was completed (bottom). The ‘Sky Room’ is also shown (bottom, left). SKETCHES: quick generative sketches illustrate the feelings intended by each room ‘Earth’ (bottom) by Colleen Brennan and ‘Sky’ (top) by Yae Lee.

17 | design/build

Page 22: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

The graduate studios at UW provide students with opportunities to work with diverse urban communities, civic organizations, and public agencies on projects ranging from community gardens to waterfront public space. The sequence of graduate studios begins with the Ecological Urbanism Studio that explores the integration of ecological design and urban public realm.

This is typically followed by the Design Activism Studio, which for the past five years has focused on developing community infrastructure in the informal settlement of Lomas de Zapallal in Lima, Peru, with projects ranging from the design of school grounds to development and installation of fog collectors to supply the community with a consistent fresh water supply.

Other studio options include the Art & Landscape Studio, the Landscape Urbanism Studio, and the Urban Agriculture Studio, focusing on design for urban food production and community gardening. Each of these studios focuses on an integral aspect of contemporary landscape architecture practice, ranging in scale from community garden details to city scale green stormwater infrastructure.

While the themes and focuses of each studio differs, the overarching goals are the same - to train students as designers that utilize the landscape to mitigate some of the worlds most pressing issues - climate change, poverty, food security, urban health and human connections to nature.

graduate studios

Page 23: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

500 studios

Page 24: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

A society, as its history unfolds, can make an existing heterotopia function

in a very diff erent fashion.

The heterotopia is capable of juxtaposing in a single real place

several spaces that are in themselves incompatible.

Heterotopias presuppose a system of opening and closing that both isolates

them and makes them penetrable.

The heterotopia has a function in relation to all the space that remains.

- Michel Foucault

Of Other Spaces

“There is probably not a single culture in the world that fails to constitute heterotopias.” - Michel Foucault

The objective of this island is to embody the principles of Michel Foucault’s heterotopia. Then, using those qualities, to engage Seattle neighborhoods in the conversation on environmental equity.

Grayson Durant MorrisArt + Landscape

Autumn 2015THE VESSEL: Of Other Spaces. For Public Places.

ART & LANDSCAPEurban islands + archipelagosThis 507 studio married the practices of art, architecture, and landscape architecture. The project site, Elliot Bay in connection to Seattle’s water network, was studied for its phenomena, relationships, and systems. Students designed art islands to exist within, and respond to, the project site. The objective was to “craft forms and places that work with

natural forces to register and amplify their capacities, provoke wonder, and assert a moral imperative.” Student work was expected to “employ fluid boundaries between science and art, natural and synthetic, cultural and wild, real and imagined.”

-Laura Haddad, Artist and Lecturer

Page 25: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

GRAYSON MORRIS, MLATHE VESSEL: Of Other Spaces. For Public Places. The objective of this island was to embody the principles of Michel Foucault’s heterotopia. Then, using those qualities, to engage Seattle’s neighborhoods in the conversation on environmental equity. Docking locations and docking frequency of this public landscape are determined by Seattle residents. Votes and public comments are translated into information for future open space planning. The intent being to raise awareness of environmetnal inequities. Wherever the island docks, it immediately provides needed public space in the form of a gently responsive floating plaza.

21 | 507 studio

Page 26: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

BRITTON SHEPARD, MLAEchoing spoils barges traditionally used on Elliott Bay, the deck of this repurposed barge is a walkable interface where visitors can see and touch the rocks, gravel and artifacts beneath a city continuously remaking itself. It allows for the reading of one story above, and another below. The underground library is a heterotopia where users experience landscape as text to be read, giving voice to stories of the past.

RHYS VAN BEMMEL, MLAAxonometric detail of the wave energy generation mechanism aboard Kinetic Surge. Arms rock with waves powering electric generating cranks and illuminating small lights at the crest of each arm. In this way Kinetic Surge not only collects and stores electricity gathered from Puget Sound, it also respond to changes in weather, creating a multisensory experience.

Page 27: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

23 | 507 studio

ROXANNE ROBLES, MLACritical Phenomena is a critique of environmental phenomena, and a phenomenon in itself. The barge is pulled by mule, rather than diesel-fueled tugboats, to places on the Duwamish with the highest amount of air pollution. Its presence provides a place of respite from poor air quality, as well as a signal to residents that air quality is harmful.

Page 28: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

LANDSCAPE URBANISMmitigating urban problems through landscape

GRAYSON MORRIS MLAJORGE ALARCON, MLAJOSH SAITELBACH, MLA/MUPOlympia Washington, Hydrophyllic City

504 is the application of landscape ecological theory to the design of urban environments. Areas of focus for this studio included the strategic design of critical urban infrastructure and an understanding of the cumulative performance of urban sites. The overarching goal was to utilize systems-based landscape architecture as a way to develop functional

and enjoyable civic spaces that would help mitigate urban problems such as stormwater flooding, urban heat island effect, depleted wildlife habitat, and degraded environmental health. The scale moved from the seasonal transformations across the city, down to the site and it’s associated daily human experience.

Page 29: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

01Phase

Problem

6”

SLR

Deep Flooding Buildings Green Blocks Green Streets Berm + Access CSO Network

24”

SLR

50”

SLR

70-85 years

40-50 years

15-20 years

Intervention

02Phase

03Phase

25 | 504 studio

Hydrophyllic City aims to transform Olympia into a storm resilient community over time through phases of interventions that address a projected increase of stormwater. This design proposes significant infrastructural solutions such as: a berm with floating wetland habitat, consolidated CSO network, and a pervasive water storage network. Far left: Berm with recreation, habitat, storage, and protection. Left: Phasing diagram. Below: Sketch laid over a photo of the existing conditions model.

Page 30: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

COMMUNITY DESIGNaddressing urban issues through community engagement

BRITTON SHEPARD, MLACommunity ideas for the new Jackson Park P-Patch reflect traditional solutions found in allotment gardens across cultures. The instinct to organize and enrich garden spaces is a universal aesthetic, and became the central theme for this design.

503 is a service-learning studio with emphasis on the role of design in community building and placemaking in urban neighborhoods. Exploration of the social, economic, political and physical dimensions of urban design is encouraged through projects focused on real issues facing

community spaces in dense urban areas. The community design studios focus on the participation of the project site’s users and stakeholders. The needs and desires of those who directly use the site are the impetus for student design proposals.

Page 31: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

27 | 503 studio

JAMES WOHLERS, MLAJackson Park P-Patch, North Seattle. Left: Section of P-Patch from street entrance to proposed canopy walk, highlighting gathering space and fire pit in between. Below: Aerial of P-Patch highlighting key design elements. Creek and forest intermingle with the city street to frame the P-Patch and the gardeners within. These tranquil surroundings set within an urban context inspired the design for the garden.

Page 32: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

DESIGN ACTIVISMhuman & ecological health in Iquitos, Peru.Using evidence-based-design techniques and interdisciplinary research across global health, ecology, environmental psychology, and other fields, students examine the intertwined relationship between humans and environmental health. The objective is to design

low-cost, culturally mindful landscape interventions, while exploring the potential of landscape architecture to act as preventive medicine, ecological restoration and community resilience.

Page 33: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

SHUYI GAO, MLA & FANG YUAN, MLAThis project focused on a floating community in Iquitos, Peru. The objective was to improve upon existing infrastructural systems to address human, environmental, and ecological health issues. Design elements include a covered walkway, agriculture, aquaculture, human waste collection, and lighting network.

29 | 502 studio

Page 34: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

URBAN ECOLOGYecosystem services in public space

KASIA KEELEY, MLAThe Washington Hall Plaza is the Northeast entrance to Harvest Park and was designed as an informal outdoor amphitheater that marries the ground plane plaza with the adjacent community buildings. An ADA accessible pathway navigates through abstract concrete prisms and table-like plinths that serve as places to sit, scramble, and send water to planters.

The Gehl Studio traditionally adopts a theme inspired by Scandinavian design practices and has covered issues as diverse as urban agriculture, urban play, and public waterfronts. Each year the studio is focused on generating comprehensive design schemes aimed at offering critical interventions and unique amenities to a site in Seattle.

With generous support from the Scan|Design Foundation, the studio involves two weeks of study abroad in Denmark and Sweden. Traveling around cities by bicycle, students soak in urban design lessons from practitioners such as Gehl Architects, COBE and Schønherr, and many others.

Page 35: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

31 | 501 studio

JESS HAMILTON, MLAThis interdisciplinary group project explored community building and accessibility in the context of affordable intergenerational housing. The courtyard was developed around the concept of actively growing together.

Page 36: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

SHUYI GAO, MLAwith Emily Darling, MARCH and Melanie Hess, MLAAdjacent to Bailey Gatzert Elementary School, at the nexus of several diverse urban communities, the “Co-op” has the opportunity to meet a variety of community needs as a community commons.

Page 37: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

33 | 501 studio

Page 38: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

The Foundation Studios provide BLAs and MLAs with the basic skills in design conceptualization, development, and understanding of social factors, natural processes, forms, composition and aesthetic in urban ecological design.

Students move through a sequence of assignments and projects that explore design in different site contexts and scales, working with different representation methods, media and materials.

These studios are intended to create a strong foundation for landscape design in order for students to move forward into more detailed design scenarios in the design/build for BLAs and the 500 studios and theses for MLA students.

In addition to fostering critical design skills, these studios also set a standard for the high level of quality and the large quantity of design work expected throughout the program. Learning skills that contribute to good design such as iteration, time management and team work are also founded in 300 level studios.

foundation studios

Page 39: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

300 studios

Page 40: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

ECOLOGICAL DESIGNfoundations studio

WINTERSPRING SUMMER AUTUMN

51.848.2o 58.1o 64.4o 71.6o 73.4o 69.8o 58.1o o 47.3o45.5oF F F F F F F F F F 45.3o

F44.6oF 5 FT

O

O

O2

2

2

Algae decay leads to drop in oxygen levels, forcing Daphnia to produce more hemoglobin to breathe

DAPHNIA PULEX

Asexual reproduction (cloning) during algae bloom season = All females

Drop in temperature and decreasing food source =Sexual reproduction to create eggs to survive till next season

Daphnia eggs lie dormant until ideal temperature conditions permit hatching

oo

CHASING THE BLOOMJACQUELINE KIM | LARCH 303 | 2014

TIME

DE

NSI

TY

TIME

DE

NSI

TY

DAPHNIA DECREASING

1612842

1980 2000180190200210220230240250

1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s

LONGER SUMMER STRATIFICATION IN # OF DAYS

52535455565758

1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s

SUMMER WATER TEMPERATURES RISING: TOP 30 FT OF WATER

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

FACTORS AFFECTING DAPHNIA-ALGAE INTERACTION = TEMPERATURE & STRATIFICATION

+ =

ALGAE GROWTHDAPHNIA POPULATIONS

1990

-Small planktonic crustaceans that prey mainly on algae and bacteria-Common Peak Periods: May and June-Optimal Temperature: 64-72-Translucent body, 1-5mm long

EGG TO ADULT STAGE APPROXIMATELY 8 DAYS

DAPHNIA PULEX

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Daphnia_pulex.pnghttp://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/files/2014/03/cover_Daphnia-Wolff.pnghttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/70231/blue-green-algaehttp://www.mindfully.org/Water/2005/Washington-Water-Temperature11jul05.htmhttp://notes-from-dreamworlds.blogspot.com/2012/09/algae-and-ostracod-in-polarized-light.htmlhttp://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/waterandland/lakes/lakes-of-king-county/lake-washington/lake-washington-story.aspxhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2042/ http://wfleabase.org/genome-summaries/gene-duplicates/daphnia-hemoglobin.jpghttp://biodidac.bio.uottawa.ca/ftp/biodidac/protista/chloroph/diagbw/chlo014b.gif

GREEN ALGAE CHLAMYDOMONAS

-Eukaryotic organisms that photosynthesize to acquire energy-Bloom period: May-Sept.-Temperature tolerance: 60.8-80.6 -Wide variety of forms

Mitosis

Mitosis+

-

FertilizationRelease of Spores

SEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE LIFE CYCLE (during not so ideal conditions)

F

F

oo

JACQUELINE KIM, BLAThis exercise gave us the opportunity to explore and analyze the relationship between two organisms. Seasonal changes, temperature, water depth, and light are a few factors that affect the co-dependent life cycles daphnia and green algae.

The last 300 level studio required, 303, brings together contemporary ecological theory and landscape design theory to develop a process-based foundation for design at both the site and the landscape scale. Students

explore ecology as a science, a representation, a philosophy, and a design strategy. This studio generally focuses on a real design project in the Seattle area, teaching students about local ecological systems and relationships.

Page 41: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

37 | 303 studio

KASIA KEELEY, MLAThis plant palette for Meadowbrook Park looks at the flood tolerance of different plants as well their ability to either remove pollutants or provide food.

Page 42: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

KASIA KEELEY, MLAThe design for Meadowbrook park addressed a flooding and polluted river adjacent to the elementary school with selective hardscaping to channel stormwater to phytoremediary plantings and serve as a skatable pathway for neighboring students. (Plant palette, previous page)

Page 43: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

39 | 303 studio

ARUM CHO, BLAConflicting cultures of old Ballard, the maritime industry and new urbanites are reconciled in this culutral landscape project. An urban park was designed with aspects of Scandinavian mythology and folklore as a common core. These plants will bloom into the colors of Scandinavia in summer to celebrate the cultures that created Ballard.

Page 44: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

APRIL MULCAHY, BLA

URBAN SITESfoundations studio

302 is the second of the first-year studio sequence, structured to further explore and refine the foundational design skills that are essential in landscape architecture. This studio builds upon the skills acquired in the students’ first studio and introduces new skills and challenges

to help address the complexities of ecological and sociological design in the urban setting. This studio generally focuses on a complex urban site - weaving together political influences, infrastructure, social equity and health related issues as related to landscape.

Page 45: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

APRIL MULCAHY, BLAThe entrance design for the VA hospital in Seattle provides a welcoming and ecologically-sound gateway to the center. Low mounds of flowing grasses permit views of the Puget Sound, the rain swale provides stormwater infiltration, and a niche for wildlife (left). The inner courtyard contains a large waterfall to mask the sounds of the ventilation fans. A minimalist plant palate of green and white creates a soothing atmosphere for healing and meditation (right).

41 | 302 studio

Page 46: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

JENI CHAN, MLAA reimagination of a contentious space under the viaduct that involves keeping the structural beams as a historic remnant while opening the site to the sky for a more welcoming space.

Page 47: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

JEAN NI, MLAForm is guided by a dual focus on biomass filtration and channeling of stormwater through the tunnel. A solid triangle above represents opening to the sky plane, while below, a dotted triangle represents a functional overlay on the ground plane. The quick vignette (bottom) illustrates the opportunity to create a dynamic and visually striking waterfall entrance to the tunnel and site.

43 | 302 studio

Page 48: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

KEVIN VAN METER, MLA

Page 49: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

Welcome Plant Care Return

45 | 302 studio

KEVIN VAN METER, MLALeft: An elevated park on a converted viaduct gives access to new perspectives on the city while connecting a rapidly developing neighborhood to Seattle’s waterfront. Right: An interactive memorial wall at the Puget Sound VA invites long-term patients to honor a loved one with a planting or a memento. The wall grows and transforms as patients come and go. Connecting to the wall facilitates patients’ sense of place and recovery.

Page 50: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

JEAN NI, MLABelltown site concept illustrates vibrant activity at the mouth of Battery Street Tunnel and syncopated meadow planting plan that extends beyond entrance.

Page 51: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

47 | 302 studio

MARGOT CHALMERS, MLAThe viaduct in Belltown is transformed into a planted pedestrian pathway connecting the Battery Street tunnel with Pike Place Market, featuring spectacular ocean views along the way. The archway forms help shape visitors’ views down the walkway, spaced so as to not impede views to the ocean.

Page 52: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

MONICA TAYLOR , MLA+ NICKY BLOOM, MLASite PlanReimagining automobile infrastructure as human and ecological space.

Page 53: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

49 | 302 studio

MONICA TAYLOR , MLA+ NICKY BLOOM, MLAThis perspective peers out from an enclosed stretch of a proposed Battery Street tunnel park towards an uncapped, open, stormwater collection garden. A wooden pathway and stepping stones made from debris from the former tunnel lid provide exploration space for people walking through the tunnel, and the planted space provides much-needed habitat within the most densely populated neighborhood in Seattle.

Page 54: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

DESIGN FOUNDATIONSintroduction to landscape architecture

JEAN NI, MLA

301 serves as the first foundation studio (in a sequence of three) for both graduate and undergraduate students. Design thinking is taught through small scale exercises which culminate in a site design project that is typically done in groups. The goal for the studio is to cultivate

the translation of conceptual thinking and conveying intention through graphics that support mindful design interventions. This studio represents many students’ first foray into landscape representation and design. This studio tends to produce unique, often experimental, graphics and designs.

Page 55: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

51 | 301 studio

JEAN NI, MLALeft: Exploration of trajectory along a line in section, Ravenna Park. Ink staining represents moisture in the ground plane as well as phenomenological qualities of humidity in the atmosphere. Right: Section across a site with vertical planting plan overlay. The placement indicates time of year and duration that each plant blooms or displays seasonal color. Ink staining shows moisture levels in the earth along section, one factor used to guide plant species locations.

Page 56: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

ANGIE OH, BLAIn order to merge the segregated industrial corridor of Shilshole Avenue, with Ballard’s historical identity and culture, four concepts are suggested: Celebration of Scandinavian and Nordic Culture, Fishing Culture, the Linkage of the Missing Burke Gilman Trail, and Application of Ecological function.

Page 57: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

53 | 301 studio

MARGOT CHALMERS, MLAThe piece illustrates an experiential “trajectory” across Ravenna park. The piece was created in layers; first, experiential trajectory “barriers” were identified and illustrated with pencil marks; second, sight lines were drawn to illustrate possibility, openness, and enclosure. Finally, ink was demonstrates wet and dry patches on site. The piece captures the site’s misty, boggy, and muddy feel.

Page 58: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

NICKY BLOOM,, MLAThese models explore the process of flow, specifically how humans, water, and organic forest debris flow down and through Ravenna Creek ravine. These were test models to play with how different spatial interventions interact with and alter those flows.

Page 59: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

55 | 301 studio

SIERRA MILLS-DRULEY, MLA“Site as Palimpsest” de-stabilizes an occupant’s relationship to the site by extracting and concentrating natural processes that extend into deep time. The project explores the impact of the vanished old growth trees to reveal the structural and phenomenological possibilities of their continued presence within or “haunting” of the site. Playing with relationships of growth and decay, mass and void, being and non-being, the project disrupts a user’s experience in the park, confronting a deeper, more-than-human story of place.

Page 60: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

APRIL MULCAHY, BLAThis is an abstraction of Ravenna Creek, based on the idea that you never step into the same river twice. The water flows out of the ground and down the slopes of the ravine gathering and weaving to form the creek.

Page 61: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

57 | 301 studio

JEAN NI, MLASite and planting plan for a nursery “landscape performance” within Ravenna Park . Grouped plantings along a trajectory form “rooms” that shape various phenomenological experiences. Themes include precariousness, enchantment, discomfort, lushness, monochromaticity. Breaks along planting lines allow preservation of existing trees. Ink staining highlights ground-level moisture within site bounds - beginning with a stream and wetland area near the bottom, fading toward drier areas uphill.

Page 62: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

This selection of independent work represents a sliver of the broad array of work students do for classes outside landscape architure studios. These projects range from species relationship studies to art to masters theses.

Independent work represents both physical and ephemeral thinking - engaging the designer and the landscape in new ways from different perspectives - sculptural, scientific, tactile and exploratory.

independent work

Page 63: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

independent work

Page 64: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

JEAN NI, MLAADVENTURESCAPE, CAVE EXPLORATIONS: Visualizing a 6x6” textured plaster mold as a landscape in itself, spaces are created through subtractive and additive interventions. A measuring device was then created in order to accurately measure and draw successive sections.

Page 65: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

55 | independent work

JESS HAMILTON, MLA .

Page 66: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

MARGOT CHALMERS, MLAENCLOSURE + EMERGENCE: This sketch model investigated ideas of enclosure and emergence through both spatial design and materiality. The goal was to create an object that expressed these qualities simultaneously.

Page 67: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

577 | independent

BRITTON SHEPARD, MLARevealing the Splendor of the Ordinary: Site 1121 was a temporary landscape art installation in the University District that brought students, local artists, volunteers, and community activists together in a site exploration that made a closed site accessible to the public imagination.

SITE 1121revealing the splendor of the ordinary

Page 68: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

Embedded in flagrant mass consumption and

rapid production of waste our landscape is being

impacted in significant and irreparable ways. Coupled

with unprecedented increases in population and

energy consumption, it is difficult to look at our global

environment and not see an overwhelming accumulation

of significant changes. Landscape architecture’s multi-

faceted approach and focus lends itself to addressing any

one of the above

issues with the best

projects being those

that can successfully

address many.

The field must continue to look beyond just designing

beautiful spaces and also focus not on creating simulacra

of functioning natural or social systems but environments

that actually nurture a greater ecological good. LA

must address these above issues while simultaneously

focusing its lens on its moral obligation to assist those

environments and populations that have been most

jeopardized by previous uses.

My interest in landscape architecture stemmed

from the very specific experience of watching citizens of

a rust belt city regain ownership of vacant properties and

redevelop the city’s self-image through diverse landscape

renovations. The rehabilitation did not come from big

business but grass roots farms, artwork installations,

and subsequent cafes, shops and community gathering

spaces. These landscape alterations started small but

grew to eventually create a new identity and improve

the atmosphere for the two neighborhoods. They have

continued to flourish

and are evidence

to the fact that

landscapes can

inspire positive

growth when people regularly have the opportunity to

interact with interesting and progressive spaces. Resident

action resulted in better healthy food access, more green

space, more creative environments, and more community

engagement which each offered a host of benefits beyond

their immediate value. Well thought-out spaces have the

opportunity to provide indiscriminate access to nature;

reduction in environmental pollutants; a supply of natural

resources; and resilience against natural disasters.

Wanting to make a similar contribution within other

post-industrial towns and underserved communities

“I wanted to step away from being a single operative and begin understanding and initiating community-wide progress.”

Working with What We’ve GotReflections on the Rust BeltKASIA KEELEY / MLA / YEAR II

Page 69: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

inspired my shift in focus from fine arts and agriculture to

landscape architecture. I wanted to step away from being

a single operative and begin understanding and initiating

community-wide progress.

Primarily, my focus has been set on urban

landscapes that have been degraded, polluted, and

abandoned. These spaces are neglected – if not also seen

as a threat – and the communities that surround them

often experience a deficit of resources. Furthermore,

polluted sites are disproportionately located within

minority neighborhoods and jeopardize communities that

are already considered at risk. A multitude of studies

exist that equate proximity to brownfields and vacant lots

with a number of health risks such as: increased likelihood

of exposure to pollutants and chemicals; decreased

access to food and low rates of food security; increased

rates of diabetes, heart disease, and asthma. These

issues are difficult to address and need to be approached

from a number of angles. However, addressing the

polluted spaces that are perpetuating a decline in quality

of life is within the realm of possibility for landscape

architecture.

Unfortunately, a common deterrent to action

in the face of obvious need is that post-industrial

sites are expensive to rehabilitate using traditional

methods and rarely hold a profit for developers. A study

conducted by the City of Portland, Portland Development

Commission in 2004 compared four different types of

development on different brownfield and greenfield

sites, and concluded that the brownfield sites were

always, in total, more expensive to develop upon. This is

in large part due to the additional costs of cleaning the

site before development can occur. These high costs

often deter investment but when a polluted site is still

seen as worth developing upon, this too can come with

a host of negative repercussions. Redevelopment for

industrial purposes can re-introduce more pollutants.

Redevelopment for commercial use can begin a process

of gentrification and cause displacement of communities

due to steep increases in property values. In total,

independent | 59

Page 70: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

post-industrial sites are very socially, economically, and

ecologically complicated.

There is a niche, however, within landscape

architecture, preservation, and ecology that is focused

on the reuse of previously developed spaces through

small-scale community action. These range in scope

from harvested land to old houses to small-scale former

industrial or commercial landscapes. In rehabilitating

smaller neglected properties, there is a great opportunity

to create a sum much greater than its parts through the

use of alternative, community-driven methods. This is,

characteristically, a low-cost and creative solution, and

speaks to resource conservation in the face of ever-

increasing urban densities.

It works with land that has

already been developed

rather than expanding

the urban footprint and

utilizes momentum of community efforts to push projects

forward. Even with small-scale interventions, community-

based urban redevelopment can have a powerful affect

on residents’ qualities of life. It can also be the driving

force for large-scale redevelopment that is controlled

by the community instead of enacted upon it. With

the mounting strain on resources, urban landscapes

need to step up the complexity by which they address

development and integrate polluted spaces into their field

of vision. Expanding the focus in this direction has the

opportunity to not just impact an individual environmental

condition but to create a new perspective on how we

address our global condition.

Adjusting the perspective of design to focus

more intently on ecological accountability also places an

interesting emphasis on the temporal and landscapes of

flux. Although time is an innate quality to environment,

the necessity of landscape architects to design for

unprecedented shifts in environmental/ecological

change has added a layer to design that demands a

greater amount of scientific accountability. Landscape

architecture has expanded from collaboration with

structural engineers and architects to include those in

biology, hydrology, and other environmental sciences

as well. In expanding the conversation, we expand our

opportunities. Public spaces are serious players in

developing community

resilience. Through

application of scientific

measures these spaces can

offer greater protection

for the community in the wake of increasingly dramatic

ecological events.

The public should not be blind to this either. Even

if the user is not directly involved in the shaping of these

environments, they should still have the opportunity to

experience the benefit of understanding how a space

is working with nature. Although immediate enjoyment

of the space may be the primary goal, knowing more

about the place one experiences on a daily basis creates

a deep bond with the user. Consequently, this bond

creates respect, pride, and stewardship. Likewise, while

providing this level of scientific scrutiny to a site may

seem to completely undermine the visual and aesthetic

“The public should not be blind to this either.”

Page 71: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

experience, instead, it should used as a means of

shaping design decisions. There is a beauty to an honest

landscape that admits its fabrication and utility while still

remaining on the human scale. There are opportunities

to create spaces that are surreal or appear unnatural

and can captivate users while still celebrating ecological

function. These ideas are echoed in Elizabeth Meyer’s

“Sustaining Beauty, the Performance of Appearance: A

Manifesto in Three Parts”, which also recognizes that

there is an opportunity for landscape architects to not

cover up the ecological processes within a site but to

engage users in a discussion about their surrounding

environments. In starting this discussion on a local scale,

it can encourage people to look at the global condition

and better understand the forces at work. It also holds

the chance to push for new norms of what is accepted

as beautiful or interesting. We are living within a world

that has been radically altered by industrialization, and

urban landscape design can now shift the heavy hand of

development towards the positive. Spaces can be shaped

for optimal performance and enjoyment and, in turn,

inspire a sense of appreciation for the location and nature

as a whole.

There is a sense of urgency and necessity of

action within all scales of ecology and urban development

that is at once overwhelming and inspiring. Landscape

architecture is ideally situated to respond thoroughly

and thoughtfully to these ecological and social needs

across a range of scales with specific focus on those

communities who are most underserved or limited by

their environments. Previous development of properties

focused on the quickest action and most profitable

yield has resulted in a deficit of resources, health and

environmental risks, and deters positive future growth.

Landscape architecture has the opportunity to re-engage

these properties and shift their perception from a liability

to an asset. With an infinite number of possible solutions,

what is important is a considerate, collaborative approach

that inspires a better quality of life.

1. Landrigan, P., Rauh, V., Galvez, M., (2010).

“Environmental Justice and the Health of Children.” Mount

Sinai Journal of Medicine, 77:178-187

2. Campbell, Julia N.M. New Urbanism and Brownfields

Redevelopment: Complications and Public Health

Benefits of Brownfield Reuse as a Community Garden.

Diss. Georgia State U, 2012. Atlanta: Scholarworks @

Georgia State U, 2012. Scholarworks. Web. 12 Oct.

2015. <http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.

cgi?article=1233&context=iph_theses>

3. USA. City of Portland. Portland Development

Commission.Brownfield/Greenfield Development Cost

Comparison Study. Portland: Port of Portland, 2004.

Executive Summary. Web. 12 Oct. 2015. <http://www.

portofportland.com/PDFPOP/Trade_Trans_Studies_Brnfld_

Stdy_Exec_Smry.pdf>.

4. Meyer, E. 2008. “Sustaining Beauty, the Performance

of Appearance: A Manifesto in Three Parts.” Journal of

Landscape Architecture, 5(1), 6-23

independent | 61

Page 72: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

The continuously growing Danny Woo International

District Community Garden is an exceptional example of a

modernist landscape. It was built with modern intentions,

responding to and accommodating its target users. The

modern idea that “gardens are for people,” as advocated

by Thomas Church, is the fundamental principle behind

the creation of Danny Woo Garden and allows it to exist

prosperously. This specific landscape also follows many

contemporary ideas: it is a communal, social space,

has a dynamic design with concern for space rather

than pattern, considers its local environment, and has a

harmonizing relationship with nature/ecology, society/

culture, and art/design. Danny Woo Garden has a unique

adapting and interactive quality that continues to serve

and accommodate its users.

Danny Woo Garden emerged as a way to

accommodate the physical and social health of many

elderly immigrants who lived in the area. It is both a

symbol and an everyday embodiment of efforts to rebuild

the historic ethnic community. The garden was designed

in 1975 by Dan Rounds and is currently managed by the

Inter*In Community Development Association. It was

named after its patron, Danny Woo, who was a local

businessman and restaurant owner who donated his

land for the garden. Starting in 1989, the garden’s design

began to formalize and address issues of identity and

orientation through the involvement of the Neighborhood

Design/Build Studio at the University of Washington, led

by Professor Steve Badanes.

Joe

Mab

el a

nd W

ikim

edia

Com

mon

s htt

ps:/

/upl

oad.

wik

imed

ia.o

rg/w

ikip

edia

/com

mon

s/5/

55/D

anny

_Woo

_Com

mun

ity_G

arde

n_10

.jpg

Page 73: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

For one of the most influential landscape architects of

this century, Garret Eckbo, landscape architecture was a

social art. His ideas rejected the garden and the park as

a provider of mere visual pleasure. Instead, a landscape

was the site of the interaction of people and place, and

landscape architecture – exterior spatial design – the

purposeful formation of that interaction. The multiple

interactive features of Danny Woo Garden include, but are

not limited to: access to exercise, healthy edibles, refuge,

accommodating seating, social gatherings, access for

urban wildlife, awareness for sustainable living, and scenic

views. As Majorie Sewell Cautley, a landscape architect

with the aim to solve contemporary problems through

her design, states, “the land should … provide a ready

means of escape from the noise, dust, and confusion of

the city, and offer an opportunity to relax out of doors or

to engage in wholesome exercise.” The encompassing

multitude of vegetation, winding stepping paths, and

exotic plots peaks one’s curiosity, absorbing his/her

interest in all of the features the garden has to offer.

Many nodes are to be discovered as one chooses which

path to travel. These nodes include: the open entrance

area, a seating area demarcated by Oriental structures

and permeable pavement, an educational children’s

space, a toolshed, and a pig-roasting pit area. In addition,

the many narrow dirt paths allow visitors complete access

the plots.

There is much importance in modern landscape design

on the integration of nature, society/culture, and design.

Not only is Danny Woo Garden a refuge where visitors

can relax and be relieved from the bustle of the city, it

also a place where one can engage in several activities,

whether it is taking a restorative stroll, people-watching,

or tending crops. The residents have an attachment to

their plots and enjoy taking care of them as part of their

daily lifestyle. The garden also provides many areas

for social gatherings. There are annual events that take

place there where both residents and other Seattleites

come together to celebrate the crops and meet at the

shack and pig roast area. Additionally, the combination

of the Oriental themed structures and plants from the

resident’s homeland reinforce the cultural identity of

their community (comprised of mostly elderly Asian

immigrants) . Seasonal crops such as bok choy, winter

melon, shiso, and chrysanthemum greens give aesthetic

and food all year round. The garden preserves both

Community Gardens as Modern LandscapesStewardship and the Danny Woo GardenLYNA NGET / BLA / 2016 Graduate

independent | 63

Page 74: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

nature and culture by being a place where cultivation of

crops exists to provide a sustainable living. And, it gives

the Asian dominant residents an outdoor space where

they can feel at home and have a sense of ownership.

Furthermore, the variety of interactions available to

the users with the garden reinforce the modern idea of

public engagement, as advocated by Lawrence Halprin.

He explains, “modernism is not just a matter of cubist

space, but of a whole appreciation of environmental

design as a holistic approach to the matter of making

spaces for people to live … Modernism, as I define it, and

practice it, includes and is based on the vital archetype

needs of human beings as individuals as well as social

groups.” Danny Woo Garden is the perfect example as it

is a space supplemental to those who live in the next door

apartments.

The garden continues to be lively with the activities that

follow the seasons, change in colors in the cherry blossom

trees, and the weathering of structures. Stewardship is a

contemporary activity regarding landscapes; the nurture

and care of the neighboring residents keep Danny Woo

Garden active, sustainable, and beautiful. All aspects of

this garden reinforce the idea of a modernist landscape,

especially the community that cultivates it. Reflective of its

community, Danny Woo Garden exhibits vibrancy, cultural

identity, and sustainability.

1. Church, Thomas, Hall, Grace, & Laurie, Michael.

Gardens are for People, Third Edition. Berkeley and Los

Angeles, California: University of California Press, 1995.

Print.

2. Gardening with Ciscoe: Danny Woo Garden. King

5. 2012. Online Video. 5 Feb. 2013.

3. Hou, Johnson, and Laura Lawson. Greening Cities

Growing Communities: From Seattle’s Urban Community

Gardens. University of Washington Press: Seattle. Print.

4. InterIm Community Development Association.

Danny Woo Garden and Children’s Garden. Web. Feb. 19,

2013.

5. Teri, Hen. Stories from Seattle’s Parks. Seattle.

Gov/Parks. Web. Feb. 19, 2013.

6. Trieb, Marc and Imbert, Dorethee. Garrett Eckbo:

Modern Landscapes For Living. Berkely and Los Angeles,

California: University of California Press, 1992. Print.

7. Walker, Peter and Melanie Simo. Invisible

Gardens: The Search for Modernism in the American

Landscape. Cambridge: Mass: MIT Press, 1994. Print.

Page 75: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

The digital age is changing design, and today this shift

moves as fast as ever. This generation of professionals

share the opportunity and responsibility to incorporate

new methods into mainstream practice. Technology

represents an opportunity in design because it can

provide new sources of information for design decision

making. While information or its analysis will never replace

expertise and training, they certainly will enrich both.

That means data and systems modeling are significant

resources available in facilitating results oriented design.

Hence incorporating tech is also a responsibility for

professionals who believe and represent design to be a

social agent.

Though landscape design has been slow to recognize

this, architects of buildings have undertaken significant

advances in shifting the organization of their craft

toward close incorporation of digital tools. While ‘90’s

trends could be generalized as aesthetically focused (cf.

Folding in Architecture), visions extant since the ‘70’s of

computation as enabling outcomes simulation became

ever more within reach as tools have increased in power

and ubiquity. Today, computation is utilized for both

aesthetic and performative goals in designing buildings.

Future developments are auspicious, as continuing

advancement in computer science has made new families

of algorithms available widely, often in open source

distribution.

Early and simple algorithmic implementation in

design focused often on geometrical concerns. The

most elementary form of parametric design involves

computed geometric dependencies. That is to say, the

designer builds a relationship between some of those

aspects of the design which are extended in space, those

attributes such as dimension and volume. This allows

the design intention to sustain edits to particulars of

size or placement without requiring redrawing. This is

easily conceived in the context of a structure, particularly

when assuming a level foundation elevation. In principle,

geometric algorithms could be quite useful in landscape

design. There is a significant hurdle, which is that no

landscape design intervention is ever perfectly flat—thus

flat representations are necessarily abstractions. Any

geometric dependencies must elegantly incorporate the

influence of terrain.

More advanced algorithms are used to simulate

environmental concerns. For example, computational fluid

Prospects for LandscapeComments on following architecture into the digital age IVAN HEITMAN / MLA / Year III

independent | 65

Page 76: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

dynamics are very useful in approximating air flow within

a containment. Hydrological models have long been used

by engineers to provide feedback on decision-making in

the outdoor realm. These workflows are essential to good

landscape design, and should not be the provenance

of outside consultancy. Separating design process from

environmental simulation forces a back-and-forth, in

which the designer is always guessing based on rules of

thumb and experience, waiting days or longer to see the

results of his or her decisions. Environmental models

must be made accessible to design, and designers must

learn to understand their use.

Algorithmic methods which are

presently in ascendance include

machine learning and neural

networks. Architects have used

neural networks for multivariate

optimization. This means that a

design problem can be structured

with several variables which are

considered to interact and to represent trade-offs.

The algorithm then tests many cases for outcomes on

particular goals for each variable, returning those cases

which result in an ‘optimal’ balance of goals. The designer

then uses his or her expertise to select from the optimal

cases. This workflow is very well suited to landscape

design, though effective implementation promises

difficulty. A paradigm of landscape as interconnected

systems maps well onto multivariate optimization. The

challenge is to represent systems interactions with

sufficient rigor that the model results in actionable

analysis. This will require interdisciplinary work and use of

models developed in natural sciences research.

Machine learning offers a possible counterpoint to

systems representation in models. On large enough

datasets, machine learning algorithms can return very

accurate models of associations. One well known example

is machine vision. Software can recognize a human face

and identify it as like a known set. Machine vision can

achieve sophisticated spatial data collection, such as that

created in videogrammatry. Given significant data on

landscape phenomena, interactions could be modeled

by machine learning methods, supplementing manual

composition of models by experts.

In the long run, ecological health

in urban and nonurban landscape

could be monitored and analyzed

for incorporation in design practice.

If landscape really is infrastructure,

then it is no more peculiar to

imagine smart landscape metrics

than smart electrical grids. In fact it is vital to do so in

order to sustain livability and pursue environmental

justice in the age of urbanization.

Civil service is beginning to understand the value and

urgency of such efforts. Famously, the UK is transitioning

by 2016 to require all public architecture projects to

be delivered in a Building Information Model format.

Landscape Information Models are still a dream. While

few U.S. governing bodies are likely at this time to legislate

such requirements, industry pressures will continue to

mount toward better data collection and management,

“If landscape really is infrastructure, then it is no more peculiar to imagine smart landscape metrics than smart electrical grids.”

Page 77: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

as well as toward design delivery in digital modes which

allow data incorporation. Already there a projects which

are bid out to design firms only on condition that they can

complete the design in BIM.

In parallel with development of digital means by

architecture firms, a likely way forward calls for particular

enterprising firms to begin shouldering some investment

risk. Exploration will require hours paid to staff nerds

which cannot always be billed directly to a particular job.

Development of new workflows will require investment in

tools and knowledge. The advantage to the bottom line

will not always remain crystal clear. However by paving

the way these firms will gain the expertise and know-how

to convert exploration into value propositions which will

distinguish them in the marketplace. That know-how

will become a currency in demand widely, resulting

in a marginal advantage and a demand for skills and

supporting services as a business model.

The foundation has been laid, both by ACE

professionals and by academic institutions’ research. The

future of computation is bullish, with extraordinary value

being pursued in many other markets and industries. The

time to invest in technological know-how and application

to landscape design concerns is now.

1. “Regulations of Building Information Models -

PERFORMER Project.” PERFORMER Project. N.p., 23 Mar.

2015. Web. 09 Jan. 2016.

2. Vyzoviti, Sophia. Folding Architecture: Spatial,

Structural and Organizational Diagrams. Amsterdam: BIS,

2003. Print.

independent | 67

Page 78: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

class of 2016 dispersal mapafter graduation, many students will move home or pursue work elsewhere - dispersing around the globe

copenhagenberlin

japanseoul

china

virginia

minnesotacalifornia

hawaii

ecuadorperu

Page 79: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1

Some last words (and a lot of thank yous)

This project emerged from a series of discussions with students during happy hour, in hallways and stairwells, and through various meetings. Thus, a great debt is owed to the many tremendous minds and hands who helped create this publication.

The goal was to start something, and we have collectively done that. As such I owe great thanks to: Kasia Keeley, Jennie Li, and Hailey Mackay—these three women have served as invaluable organizers and the most judicious doers I could have possibly hoped for.

Further thanks are also greatly owed to: Jess Hamilton, Kelly Douglas, Monica Taylor, Kevin VanMeter, Grayson Morris, Roxanne Robles and the many other contributors who offered their time and energy to help make this happen. As for faculty, we are indebted to Department Chair Jeff Hou who recognized this effort and put forth his support to guide and help realize our goal. We also owe great thanks to the rest of the faculty who offered their critiques and insights as we attempted something close to impossible: to create a student publication, from scratch, in less than a year.

To the students that submitted their work and to our generous panel of jurors—thank you, this never could happened without you.

It is my sincere hope that future generations of students are inspired to not just continue this project but to improve and revise upon this first iteration. This is a very satisfying first round of what we hope will become a larger project. The students of the Landscape Architecture Department at the University of Washington are a unique

collective of individuals—a group who continues to push the boundaries of landscape through alternative outlets, engaging critical design and thinking across disciplines. This publication was both inspired and created by this incredible group of people. I count myself as lucky to be among them.

We are poised as both a department and a discipline at a unique crossroads of practice and academia. Our goal as a collective is to push our boundaries, to move forward in practice with vigor, compassion, and insights garnered from earnest exploration. While this publication does not yet represent all of the complexity and brilliance that thrives within our program, it is the first iteration of what we hope will become a tradition of celebrating student work. Our instructors have fostered and cultivated a design culture that acknowledges mistakes as opportunities and successes as the first steps in an on-going process.

As students, we are part of an ever evolving consortium of theorists, designers, and researchers, tirelessly investigating the world we inhabit. And with that spirit, I give great thanks to those who have helped realize this first publication; and to those who pick up this torch and carry it further than we were able.

As with any act of cultivation: it is always just the beginning.

- Andrew Prindle, MLA, Editor in Chief

59 | afterword

japan

Page 80: UWASLA UW CBE - S.O.W. vol.1