Fushë Çidhën commune, diBRa county · 2014. 5. 9. · Tirana 2008 FUSHË ÇIDHËN DIBËR Fushë...
Transcript of Fushë Çidhën commune, diBRa county · 2014. 5. 9. · Tirana 2008 FUSHË ÇIDHËN DIBËR Fushë...
Tirana 2008
FUSHË ÇIDHËN
DIBËR
Fushë Çidhën commune, diBRa countyMid-Term Development Strategy 2008–2015
2
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
This strategic plan has been written by stakeholder groups from the Commune of Fushë Çidhën with advice and guidance from FLAG. FLAG do not accept any liability for the accuracy or content of the strategy; they do however congratulate the Municipality for the quality of their work.
Copyright © 2008 Commune of Fushë Çidhën, Dibër County
Design and PrintingMaluka shpk
3
Table of Contents Page
I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5
II. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 6
III. Expected benefits from Strategic Plan implementation ........................................................ 8
IV. Implementation of the Plan ................................................................................................. 10
V. Vision and Goals ................................................................................................................. 11
VI. Local business survey ......................................................................................................... 12
VII. History of the commune ...................................................................................................... 14
VIII. Information and current trends ............................................................................................ 18
IX. SWOT analysis ................................................................................................................. 23
X. Matrix of the Strategic Plan ................................................................................................ 28
XI. Forms on strategic development ......................................................................................... 31
XII. Project fiches ................................................................................................................. 41
Annex
Annex 1: Decision of Commune Council ........................................................................................ 58Annex 2: Analysis of survey of businesses in Fushë Çidhën ........................................................... 59
4
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
4
Fushë Çidhën commune and its villages
Fushë Çidhën
Rrenxë
Blliçe Laçej
Region of dibra and the location of Fushë Çidhën commune
4
Fushë Çidhën commune and its villages
Fushë Çidhën
Rrenxë
Blliçe Laçej
Region of dibra and the location of Fushë Çidhën commune
5
introductioni.
I greet and thank in advance all the readers of this document, hoping that the interest you are showing in our commune will encourage you to contribute towards its development according to your possibilities and in the implementation of the mid-term development strategy of Fushë Çidhën (Fush Alie) commune.
I salute the contribution of the community members, their chosen representatives and the administrative staff of our commune, who have actively participated in the implementation phases of the strategy development, which can now be considered as the product of cooperation among all interested parties.
I thank the government of the Netherlands, which, through the contribution of SNV and the excellent cooperation with the authorities and specialists of Dibra District and FLAG, has enabled us to conclude this main strategic document for the rapid and well-planned development of our commune.
It is precisely the best human qualities and wisdom in appraisal of specific situations that made pos-sible an arrangement of programmes collectively in a mid-term development plan, which is based on research of the current strengths and activation of potential opportunities, as well as elimination of weaknesses and avoidance of threats.
Our commune does not lack the capacity to figure out efficient methods for implementation of its vision of the future, assessing and using the assistance offered by the organizations and institutions participating in this project and which, with their goodwill and commitment, became part of our ef-forts to develop a Strategic Development Plan for Fushë Çidhën (Fush Alie) Commune, for the period 2008–2015.
We require the contribution of everyone with an interest in this Plan, and I declare that the local authorities will welcome you because we are convinced that economic development of this commune demands rapid implementation of the Plan, which will assist all actors in terms of organization and implementation of services to be provided to the community.
head oF communeaRanit sKePi
6
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
methodologyii.
The steps and actions taken during the process to compile a Vision and Strategic Plan of Fushë Çidhën Commune considered the fact that a Vision is a joint declaration from a community and other actors involved with it to try and achieve for an improved future. The present document, the Strategic Plan, shows how this Vision will become a reality. It specifies the main goals, objectives, programs and projects that will make possible the fulfilment of the Vision, and refers to the budget, human resources and legal issues that relate to the planned implementation.
Successful implementation of the Vision and Strategy will benefit the community in many ways. In particular it will:
1. bind the community2. identify new possibilities3. encourage participation of the local community in local government4. help improve the quality of local governance5. ensure better grounds for planning and decision making6. encourage working in partnership7. help achieve concrete changes that will improve the quality of life and economical stability
of the community
Preliminary stagepolitical involvement of Head of Commune and of other members agreed upon•
setting up of a group under the leadership of the Head of Commune to guide the process•
selection of staff and project leader•
decision made about other groups that need to be involved to support the project•
obtaining of external expertise•
compilation of project planning and time frames•
compilation of list with possible players to be engaged in the process•
informing of central and local governments, as well as neighbouring local units, and anticipa-•
tion of their cooperationsetting up of supporting groups according to topic•
1st stageselection of data source and data to be collected•
data collected from the respective sources•
data analyzed to identify main trends•
data compared•
short report prepared, including description of main characteristics of the zone•
7
business questionnaires conducted•
profile of commune used to feed SWOT analysis•
2nd stageengagement of all players and analysis of main trends by making use of extended meetings •
of Planning Commission and the questionnaires conducted with businessesbrainstorming techniques were applied during data analysis•
3rd stagethe Vision declaration was drafted describing how the commune is currently viewed and how •
it might be regarded in the future with appropriate use of imagination, creativity, objective reality, and analysis of data gathered about the commune from consultations with the local community. The Vision encapsulates the strengths and possibilities identified for the area in and around the communeSWOT analysis was conducted to specify the internal strengths and weaknesses of the community, •
as well as the possibilities and dangers that come from outside factors. The analysis was based on data and information collected about the commune and its future. Focus groups, meetings in the community, brainstorming and other facilitation techniques were used to complete the analysisthe Vision declaration was finalized after completion of the SWOT analysis, which was tested •
through focus group meetings or more general meetings in the community. SWOT was used as the foundation for compiling the Vision
4th stageAfter the Vision was defined work began to identify ways to reach it, i.e. ‘how to get there’, which included the following:
goals that are more achievable were identified along with specification of the direction1. objectives to reach each goal were identified2. for each objective possible programs were identified3. for each program possible projects were identified4.
The projects were, with the help of all the actors involved, presented in the form of project fiches, which gather all the financial and legal implications, and required human resources, as well as assess-ing whether each project is realistic and achievable, and who will provide the financial and human resources for implementation and development.
The draft version of the material was prepared and approved by the Council of the Commune. It was the duty of all players to be involved in the monitoring and evaluation of the progress during imple-mentation of the Strategic Planning.
8
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Expected benefits from Strategic Plan implementationiii.
The benefits expected as a result of the implementation of our Strategic Development Plan (SDP) are multiple, but include the following as the most important:
provision of guidance to the commune council and administration during the annual and •
mid-term budget preparation process, allowing for focus on implementation of the projects included in the SDPfocus applied to the human and financial resources available in the areas identified, maximiz-•
ing the benefits and making it possible to achieve the goals and objectives of the SDPstrengthened sustainable partnership in decision-making, with co-financing provided by com-•
mune government and the business communityincrease in capacities of the communal administration, especially in implementation of the •
SDPcoordination of activities of organisations and agencies responsible for implementation of •
different parts of the SDPdocumentation of the progress of local economic development in the commune using forms •
for each development sectoridentification of expected results and establishment of a monitoring system, in collaboration •
with the community, in order to follow up on the completion of activities and evaluation of the results anticipated in the SDPdevelopment of an efficient system of communication between the commune government •
and its partnersfacilitation of marketing of the potentials and possibilities of doing business in the com-•
muneimprovement in the management system in the commune government to ensure an effective •
implementation of programmes and projects in the SDPprovision of guidance for central government and donors to allocate funds and to focus on •
available resourcesachievement of concrete changes in improving the quality of life and economic possibilities •
in the community
9
8
stra
tegi
c Pl
anni
ng c
omm
issio
n of
Fus
hë Ç
idhë
n c
omm
une
he
ad
A
RA
NIT
SK
EPI
ma
in G
Ro
uP
NA
IM S
PATA
, Hea
d of
Adm
in. a
nd A
rchi
ves
NA
ZMI K
UK
ELI,
Hea
d of
Fin
ance
H
AK
I PR
NEZ
HA
, Tea
cher
TE
FIK
NEZ
HA
, Dire
ctor
of S
ocia
l Ass
ista
nce
he
ad
oF
co
mm
un
e c
ou
nc
iL
SALI
SH
EHU
suPP
oR
tin
G G
Ro
uPs
Bu
sin
ess
Naz
mi K
ukel
i El
ez D
edja
N
azif
Suli
Sadi
k Sp
ata
Ferit
Dau
ti Y
mer
Pul
a
co
mm
un
ity
Sa
li Sh
ehu
Saki
p N
oka
Sher
if Lu
zha
Petri
t Tot
a Ili
r Sul
i V
ladi
mir
Gjo
ka
aG
Ric
uL
tu
Re
& L
iVe
sto
cK
Te
fik N
ezha
Su
lejm
an A
lia
Agi
m K
aros
hi
Has
an Z
huti
Rus
tan
Nez
ha
Bes
nik
Mar
ku
inst
itu
tio
ns
Nai
m S
pata
H
axhi
Nok
a H
aki P
ërne
zha
Artu
r Spa
ta
Arb
en P
ula
10
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
implementation of the PlaniV.
This document is the official Strategic Plan of our commune government and the institutions and enterprises under its control. Given that the timeframe for implementation of the Plan is longer than that of a political mandate, the success of its implementation depends on the continuous engagement of the commune government and our partners in achieving the objectives and implementation of the outlined projects.
The Communal Council, as the key factor in provision of support for the Strategic Plan, will provide guarantees for the allocation of funds for financing of the projects, and will discuss and approve the improvements suggested by the Planning Commission and the mayor.
The mayor and the person in charge for following up the implementation of the Strategic Plan will coordinate the programmes, projects and financing from central government, donors and local or international organisations, so that they follow and support the SDP. In addition, the mayor will initi-ate and implement adequate improvements in the management of the work processes and restructure the staff accordingly to facilitate implementation of the Plan. The success of the implementation will depend heavily on how the organisations and agencies involved in the Strategic Plan will manage the particular elements for which they are responsible.
11
Vision and GoalsV.
VisionThe purpose of generating a vision for the development of our commune was to enable the community to articulate where it wants to be in the future and to choose the path it would like to follow to get there. The vision will provide for the community and communal government a clear idea of what has to be done and how to concentrate their energies and resources.
The vision was developed by the Strategic Development Planning Commission, after consulting different segments of the community. The aim was to generate a vision that could be developed and accepted by as many actors and interest groups as possible, and which would provide a guide towards the preferred future of Fushë Çidhën Commune.
We believe that our vision summarises realistically the ambitions, desires and capacities of our com-mune. Our vision will be re-evaluated by the community, including the decision-makers in local government, in order for it to reflect on any necessary changes, new desires and circumstances and recent evaluations.
VISION OF FUSHË ÇIDHËN COMMUNE
By 2015, Fushë Çidhën Commune will be focusing on increas-ing agricultural and farming production, exploiting effectively its resources and providing quality infrastructure, a place where the environment and cooperation between business and local author-
ities is effective in order to encourage regular self-employment and to ensure a stable market for the commune’s products
GoalsDetermination of SDP goals helps us to take decisions about the ways and means of achieving the ambitions and the changes we need. Even though some of the goals and actions required to reach the goals are not directly related to the creation of jobs or to attracting new businesses, the future of our community is based on sound foundations such as level of education and quality of life, commune infrastructure and services. In our view, businesses do not develop and flourish in and are not attracted to communities that do not offer adequate levels and quality of infrastructure and services required by a healthy business environment.
12
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
In order to achieve its SDP goals, our commune is focused on accessing its natural and human re-sources. In order to develop the goals, the Planning Commission considered the opportunities and threats facing the commune, its history of economic development and that of the region.
Strategic Development Plan goals express the main directions in which the development of the com-mune will follow, and are listed below according to importance to local development and to the crea-tion of a favourable environment for sustainable development. They are developed through careful analysis of the vision and deal with issues crucial to the development of the commune.
A matrix is presented later in this document that lays out the strategic plan in an organized way, from Vision to Project, encapsulating the ambition, effort and initiative of the community and commune government to enable implementation of the Strategic Plan and the local economic development of the commune.
Goal 1. Provision of contemporary governance ensuring an effective and efficient administration of public assets and creating adequate conditions for stable human, social and economic development of the commune
Goal 2. Provision of public infrastructure and services of good quality in the whole commune, in order to anticipate and support the economic and social development of the commune
Goal 3. Increase in choice and stability of production, processing and trading in the commune, ex-ploiting the natural potential and advantages of the area with effective models of cooperation with business
13
Local business surveyVi.
A survey was carried out with local businesses in Fushë Çidhën commune in order to better understand their concerns, expectancies and exigencies. The intention of the survey was to gather organized information on the assessment of the business community of the economic situation in the commune, the perspective of doing business here, the conditions and regulations affecting local businesses, policies and practices that might hinder the development of existing businesses, and the community’s demands and requirements for the improvement of the business climate.
The survey on the business climate was developed in November 2007 with the participation of 25 businesses with different activities. The principal perception of the businesses is that the commune authorities do not have the adequate means and authority to support the development of small and medium enterprises. This perception could be a consequence of poor communication and dialogue between the commune authorities and businesses.
During discussions, the business representatives expressed the wish for the local authorities to have more financial resources at their disposal, so that their capacity and possibilities to support the eco-nomic development of the commune might grow.
The insertion of business opinions in the development of the Strategic Plan was an important step towards initiation of the decision-making process. Through this step opinions of a group of people with a large influence on the economic development of the commune were analyzed.
analysis of survey performed with production,processing and trading businesses
14
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
history of the communeVii.
Fushë Çidhën Commune is located in the northern part of Dibra District. It is 15 km2 in size and comprises four villages with a total population of 4,010 residents. Fushë Çidhën is situated on the eastern bank of the River Drin i Zi, and ranges in altitude from 380 m above sea level to the high peaks of Korabi mountain.
The territory of the commune has long been inhabited and historically belongs to the Çidhen region, which is also the name of the commune. There are several archaeological remains supporting the view of ancient inhabitation of the region and signs of considerable development in different periods.
This region is the centre of the Kastriot princedom and is the birthplace of the Albanian’s national hero Gjergj Kastriot Skanderbeg. More information can be found in the National Museum in Tirana and in Marin Barleti’s book The History of the Life and Achievements of Skanderbeg (Rome, 1508).
The strategic geographical position, the convenient climate, the fertile soil, the excellent water resources and greenness of the area, has made it possible historically for this region to build an economy based on agricultural and farming produce. The diversity of microclimates and the position and altitude of the land have allowed the cultivation of a wide range of agricultural and farming products.
Administratively, following the installation of the totalitarian regime, the region became an agricultural and farming cooperative. After 1990 and the implementation of reforms concerning the return of lands, the families of the region began to establish their own small businesses but in an unorganized way with little cooperation between each other. The farmers were unprepared for the changes with little capacity for investment. The unconsolidated private market, distance from urban centres, overloaded infrastructure and emigration became additional negative factors that reduced overall productivity, creating a subsistence farming economy.
The commune comprises the following four villages:1. Fushë Çidhën: 1,499 residents, 380 families with 189 ha agricultural land and 70 ha pastures2. Lace: 576 residents, 140 families with 65 ha agricultural land and 34 ha pastures3. Bllice: 1458 residents, 304 families with 203 ha agricultural land and 64 ha pastures4. Rrenze: 477 residents, 120 families with 101 ha agricultural land and 120 ha pastures
The economy of this region, has been historically based on agriculture, forestry and livestock farming. The trade in its produce has historically extended outside Dibra’s borders. However, for a long time, this area has produced mostly for its own needs. However, it has the potential to increase productivity
15
and broaden its range of products. One major obstacle to an increase in trade and productivity is the level of road infrastructure, along with the lack of irrigation and drainage systems.
Today, the residents of this region have become more and more aware of the possible exploitation of the area’s real capacities and those that can be activated, as well as the elimination of weaknesses, in order for their activities to be developed for production, processing and trade, with acceptable economic results and higher profits.
Based upon the great qualities of the residents and the natural resources of the region, the commune of Fushë Çidhën will rapidly develop through working and cooperating in an organized way.
16
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Gen
eral
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
com
mun
e
Com
mun
e of
Fush
ë Ç
idh
ën
is si
tuat
ed10
kmfr
om th
e ci
ty o
f Pe
shK
oPi
Cou
nty
diB
ëR
Ann
ual i
ncom
e pe
r cap
ita50
,000
lekë
/yea
rc
omm
une
area
1,50
0ha
Ann
ual i
ncom
e fr
om lo
cal t
axes
col
lect
ed b
y th
e co
mm
une
700,
000
lekë
Ann
ual i
ncom
e fro
m lo
cal t
axes
pla
nned
for t
he fo
llow
ing
year
1,00
0,00
0le
këto
pogr
aphi
c m
ap (n
o-m
encl
atur
e)1:
25,0
00A
nnua
l exp
ense
s on
infra
struc
ture
for y
ear 2
006
are
as fo
llow
s1,
500,
000
lekë
K-3
4-77
-d-a
K-3
4-77
-d-c
Vill
age
no. of residents
no. of families
no. of incoming families
no. of departing families
no. of immigrants
no. of vehicles
no. of students
no. of children up to 6 years old
agricultural land (ha)
Pasturage (ha)
no. of families receiv-ing social assistance
annual visits to health centres
no. of teachers
no. of physicians
no. of nurses
no. of commercial units
Fush
ë Ç
idhë
n1,
499
380
213
306
243
2618
970
193
470
13
3
Lace
s57
614
00
625
548
1365
3473
300
11
Blli
ce1,
458
304
314
154
293
2320
364
180
625
04
6
Rre
nxe
477
120
38
125
326
101
124
6549
01
3
com
mun
e to
tal
4,01
094
48
4182
4061
668
558
292
511
1,34
8
19
13
17
tech
nica
l dat
a ab
out t
he c
omm
une
tech
nica
l con
ditio
ns o
f the
pub
lic in
fras
truc
ture
und
er th
e co
m-
mun
e ju
risd
ictio
n:E
VID
EN
CE
D P
RIO
R IN
VE
STM
EN
TS R
AN
KE
D B
Y IM
POR
TAN
CE
1. R
ural
roa
dsto
tal
25km
no.
INVE
STM
ENT
DEN
OM
INAT
ION
cos
t (le
kë)
Rec
onst
ruct
ed0
km1
Com
plet
ion
of c
onst
ruct
ion
of w
ater
supp
ly sy
stem
in S
opon
ika
40,0
00,0
00U
nrec
onst
ruct
ed25
km2
Con
stru
ctio
n of
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
for F
ush
Alie
30,0
00,0
002.
urb
an r
oads
tota
l0
km3
Asp
halti
ng o
f 6 k
m ro
ad fr
om c
omm
une
cent
re to
mai
n ro
ad40
,000
,000
Rec
onst
ruct
ed0
km4
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
of re
serv
oir i
n R
renx
e5,
000,
000
Unr
econ
stru
cted
0km
5C
onst
ruct
ion
of a
foot
brid
ge o
ver G
ram
a St
ream
40,0
00,0
003.
Wat
er su
pplie
sto
tal
1un
it6
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
of tw
o irr
igat
ion
ditc
hes i
n B
llice
30,0
00,0
00
Rec
onst
ruct
ed1
unit
7R
econ
stru
ctio
n of
com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
build
ing
and
inst
alla
tion
of
nece
ssar
y eq
uipm
ent
10,0
00,0
00
Unr
econ
stru
cted
0un
it8
Con
stru
ctio
n of
two
inne
r roa
ds in
the
com
mun
e5,
000,
000
4.sc
hool
sto
tal
6un
it9
a) R
econ
stru
cted
3
unit
10B
uild
ing
area
0m
²11
Gar
den
area
0m
²12
b) U
nrec
onst
ruct
ed
3un
it13
Bui
ldin
g ar
ea0
m²
14G
arde
n ar
ea0
m²
155.
hea
lth c
entr
esto
tal
3un
it16
Rec
onst
ruct
ed3
m²
17U
nrec
onst
ruct
ed0
m²
186.
sew
er sy
stem
sto
tal
0km
19R
econ
stru
cted
0km
20U
nrec
onst
ruct
ed0
m21
7. ir
riga
tion
ditc
hes
tota
l25
km22
Rec
onst
ruct
ed0
km23
Unr
econ
stru
cted
25km
248.
Pub
lic m
arke
tsto
tal
0un
it25
Rec
onst
ruct
ed0
m²
26U
nrec
onst
ruct
ed0
m²
279.
Par
ks &
gre
en a
reas
tota
l0
m²
28R
econ
stru
cted
m²
29U
nrec
onst
ruct
ed0
m²
30
18
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
information and current trendsViii.
1. General information
Fushë Çidhën has a population density of 267 inhabitants per km• 2 in comparison with the average for Dibra of 73.4 inhabitants/km2.
After 1990, the population of Dibra decreased by an average of 16 per cent as a result of emigra-•
tion, whether abroad or elsewhere in Albania. The figure for Fushë Çidhen is much smaller, with four per cent of families leaving the commune in recent years.
In Dibra, on average 21 per cent of families receive social aid payments, but in Fushë Çidhën the •
figure is much higher: currently 54 per cent of families receive social aid.
Agriculture land covers 37 per cent and pastures cover 19 per cent of the territory of the commune. •
The average surface area of agriculture land is 0.59 ha per family, while at the county level this figure is 0.94 ha per family.
Household income mainly comes from social aid, sale of produce, money from emigrants and self •
employment. Household income per person is not known exactly, but is estimated at approximately 130 lekë per person per day.
19
2. a
dmin
istr
atio
n an
d lo
cal g
over
nanc
eTh
e Adm
inis
tratio
n of
Fus
hë Ç
idhë
n C
omm
une
com
pris
es tw
elve
em
ploy
ees,
as sh
own
in th
e sc
hem
e be
low
:Th
e C
omm
une
Cou
ncil
com
pris
es th
irtee
n m
embe
rs.
15
2. a
dmin
istr
atio
n an
d lo
cal g
over
nanc
e Th
e A
dmin
istra
tion
of F
ushë
Çid
hën
Com
mun
e co
mpr
ises
twel
ve e
mpl
oyee
s, as
show
n in
the
sche
me
belo
w:
The
Com
mun
e C
ounc
il co
mpr
ises
thirt
een
mem
bers
.
eL
ec
to
Ra
te
he
ad
oF
co
mm
un
ec
ou
nc
iL o
F t
he
co
mm
un
e
Fina
nce
Sect
or (3
)
Econ
omic
Ass
ista
nce
Dep
. (2)
A
dm. F
ushë
Çid
hën
Adm
. Blli
ce
sec
Re
ta
Ry
o
F t
he
co
mm
un
e
Arc
hive
Off
ice
(1)
Civ
il St
ate
Off
ice
(1)
Adm
. Lac
e
Adm
. Rre
nz
Cou
ncil
of F
ushë
Çid
hën
Vill
age
Cou
ncil
of B
llice
Vill
age
Cou
ncil
of L
ace
Vill
age
Cou
ncil
of R
renz
Vill
age
20
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
3. agricultureCurrently, the crops most commonly grown in Fushë Çidhën are cereals, corn and wheat, and fod-der. Arboriculture has dropped drastically compared to the time before 1990, and is very low, mainly apple trees and cherry trees. Vegetable production has also fallen, as a result of deficiencies in the irrigation system, with families producing only enough to cover their own needs: the only produce that goes to market is surplus of wheat and corn: only ten per cent of families in the commune sell surplus production, while only ten per cent of fodder goes to market.
The main capacity for producing for the market is likely to be based on growing corn, wheat, apple, pear, cherry, white bean and grape. Such production would be greatly supported by reconstruction of the irrigation system, increasing opportunities for farmers to obtain loans for agricultural machinery and through training of farmers to increase production of these products, as well as through introduc-ing highly efficient plant strains.
Another action to be taken is organization and provision of the market for future production, while the establishment of a local market for agricultural produce would be profitable, availing of the quality of the produce of this commune, as well as its location, lying only 11 km far from Peshkopi and other nearby regions with similar produce.
4. animal husbandryCurrently, beef cattle and small livestock (sheep and a few goats) are raised in the commune. Among poultry, both chicken and other fowl are raised. Fowl production is almost entirely used for own needs with very little going to market.
Much of the beef goes to the market in a processed form, with some as fresh. The same applies to small livestock. Almost all families trade surplus produce.
Bee keeping and honey production is uncommon in Fushë Çidhën, but the potential exists for this activity based on historical tradition.
5. Road infrastructureThe level of road infrastructure in Fushë Çidhën is very poor and has created a considerable disad-vantage for production and trading businesses. In order to get to the county centre, a producer has to travel 10 km to Peshkopi, along a road that is not asphalted and in very poor condition, including 3 km along the road from Kukës.
There is no asphalted rural road in the whole commune territory out of a total of 25 km, and there is a need to add a further 5 km of road in order for all four villages to be interconnected. The situation
21
is expected to improve with the asphalting of the road to Peshkopi and all the connections with the villages and through the building of new inter-urban roads.
The condition of these roads is considered key to the economic development of the region. Neverthe-less, the commune’s roads have good foundations and could be developed with quality guaranteed investments.
The construction of a bridge over the River Drini i Zi would enable Fushë Çidhën commune to become a point of transit linking the regions of Lura, Arras, Rec and Zall Dardha. This bridge would considerably shorten the distance to the tourism centre of Lura.
6. Water and electricity suppliesOf the four villages in Fushë Çidhën commune, only Rrenz and Bllica (some 45% of the whole population of the community) have a potable water supply. These villages are supplied from the system of Peshkopi, and each family has a functional supply. The rest of the population (55%) obtains its water from two small springs. The possibility exists of supplying this part of the community with water, through operating pumps in the system installed in Çidhen Village of the commune of Arras; the pipes extend as far as the public drinking fountains.
There is a functional electricity distribution network in Fushë Çidhën, which has a sub-station with sufficient capacity for the whole commune. However, it is essential to increase the number of hours of supply per day, also through the low level of non technical leaks and the regular payment of electricity bills by 90% of the residents.
The possibility exists of constructing a small hydroelectric power station on the Grama stream, in Rrenz Village, as this has considerable flow and a large height differential. The construction itself would help generate local employment.
7. transport and telecommunicationsCommunity needs for passenger transportation to Peshkopi through the commune villages, as well as transportation for school children is mostly satisfied by eight privately owned vans, which are not primarily used for this purpose. Valid minibus taxi businesses cannot be established be-cause of the poor road conditions, low income of residents and the consequent low number of passengers. Transportation of goods is also carried out by private means, sporadically and for small amounts.
The level of telecommunications is poor due to the absence of a post office and lack of land phone lines: only the mobile phone operators are functional in the region. Naturally, there is no Internet
22
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
access, and only the local television station signal is received because there is no antenna tower that provides this region with Albanian National Television signal.
8. education and professional developmentThere are five schools in Fushë Çidhën commune, including two nine-year primary schools and four elementary schools. The current number of pupils is 700. There are few cases of non-attendance. Secondary education is undertaken at Peshkopi, Kastriot and Arras. The distance walked by children to secondary school is long. Very few children attend higher education, usually because of financial restraints. There are currently eight such students, most of whom are in Tirana.
Professional development is incalculable, even though it is necessary and required by residents that are aware of their need for professional development in order to face the overall development challenges. The commune is planning professional development opportunities in most priority areas.
9. health careCurrently, in Fushë Çidhën Commune there are one health centre and three clinics in operation, with a combined staff of fourteen, including thirteen nurses and one physician. However, there is a need to increase the resources and improve the quality of the health care service. The staff carry out about 1,400 medical examinations per year.
10. BusinessIn Fushë Çidhën there are thirteen traders and service providers. The farms, all being small, have no business activity at all because of the small amount of local produce that goes to market. However, a need for training in how to manage agricultural and farming potential has been identified for the commune’s families. The basis for new production, elaboration and commercial business is related to both productivity and economic income.
11. assessment of tourism potentialThe region’s proximity to the Grama (Korabi) highlands constitutes a great potential for initiating summer and winter family tourism. This could be possible once the roads to these areas are improved. These highlands are an integral part (80%) of the territory of the commune. In addition, the banks of the River Drin i Zi could be also be exploited as recreational areas for the summer.
23
sWot analysisiX.
s—strengths that can promote development of the commune
QUALITY OF AGRICULTURAL LAND AND PASTURES WELL KNOWNThis region is well-known for the high standard of its agricultural and farming produce. The arboriculture produce has been varied and this region has supplied other regions in Albania. Moreover, due to its high quality, it has also been exported.
APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENT FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FARMING DEVELOPMENTThe environment of the region around Fushë Çidhën is in very good condition because, unlike other regions of Albania, there is virtually no pollution. Meanwhile, the climate is excellent for a wide range of agricultural produce. Frequent rainfall, the springs and vicinity of the rivers Drin i Zi and Seta, as well as the fertile land, are advantageous for the development of agriculture and arboriculture. The region is rich in forests and pastures, which are excellent for development of animal husbandry.
TRADITION OF WORK AND EDUCATIONThe inhabitants have a long tradition, generation upon generation, and appropriate experience as agricultural and farming labourers. They are also known historically for their good attitude towards education, as well as for their cleverness. The inhabitants of this region have demonstrated they have initiative, and they have created and implemented agreements with their neighbouring regions for collective protection of their properties.
NATURE OF THE REGIONThe region’s highlands and other areas of tourism potential, as well as the multiplicity of flora and fauna, can attract tourists, hunters and climbers. Such activities can be undertaken in all seasons. The region has a rich flora with many plants in great demand from the pharmaceutical industry, as well as other wild plants, such as wild hazelnut, which is in demand in international markets. The good climate allows for cultivation of domestic hazelnut, which is also in great demanding both national and international markets.
W—Weaknesses, and ways to overcome them
LOW EXPLOITATION OF EXISTING CAPACITIESIt is clear that the commune’s production covers mainly family needs with very little produce left for sale. This level of production is far from full exploitation of the production capacity of the commune’s land. This low level of exploitation is not due to lack of interest or incompetence of
24
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
farmers. There are reasons for the inefficiency, which can be reversed through ensuring normal infrastructure, crediting opportunities, enabling of contemporary organs and assurance of col-lection and marketing, as these would promote maximum exploitation of the produce and of the commune’s potential.
INADEQUATE ORGANIZATION AND INITIATIVESBeyond the objective difficulties, there are also weaknesses in the organization of common efforts and exploitation of the existing intellectual capacities, which are high given that there are certain individuals with great initiative and organizational skills in the field of business. Good organization of efforts is required along with encouragement of cooperation with support of the local and central authorities for common initiatives to be undertaken that are adequate, leading to considerable eco-nomic development.
COORDINATION OF EFFORTSA climate of cooperation and planning of common and interdependent activities is non-existent. It is probably necessary to undertake specific research that would make the level of cooperation more concrete. It is a duty of the local administration and the most prepared people to put together proposals and develop research based on coordination of efforts and clear cooperation platforms.
PRODUCTION IS MAINLY FOCUSED ON FAMILY NEEDSAs long as the current situation continues, in which families produce only for their own consump-tion, there will be no agricultural and farming business in Fushë Çidhën. The small quantities that families sell are just a tiny glimmer of hope of economic development of the region. It is essential that the commune takes initiatives to encourage, firstly, a study on the opportunities each family has to produce for the market, and secondly, organization for planning annual production and then provi-sion of the market. Based on the produce, business associations present a good opportunity to initiate the organization of the effort.
SCARCE INFRASTRUCTUREThe local infrastructure is very deficient. It includes not only the poor local irrigation and drainage systems, but also the road infrastructure, which is regarded as the most important factor in holding back the economic development of the region. There are also deficiencies in the potable water and electricity supplies, as well as the costly means of communication and these have a negative role in the economic development of the region. Good step-by-step planning towards improvement of the situation is crucial, and this ought to be based on a strategic plan, in which all actors in the commune could find themselves with tasks that require commitment and interaction.
25
o—opportunities to be exploited to help development
WILLINGNESS OF LOCAL AND CENTRAL AUTHORITIESThe commitment of both local and central government to develop initiatives in the community is obvious, with demonstration of good willingness for cooperation with all possible actors towards achieving the highest possible standards of economic development.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR TOURISM DEVELOPMENTCooperation with local and foreign investors, including the diaspora, and good organization and promotion can lead to improvement of the commune’s infrastructure for the development of mountain and winter tourism, and outdoor sports, including hunting. This opportunity has been created by the local topography and climate, its fauna and flora, and on the general nation-wide improvement of road infrastructure, water and electricity supply systems and communications.
USE OF MICRO CREDITSAccess to micro-credits from banks operating in the county centre is becoming easier. The availability is based much upon the development policies of both central and local authorities, who are encouraging the banks to lend money to businesses, including farmers, in order to support the economic development of rural areas.
INCREASE OF TRADITIONAL PRODUCE BY FARMERSThe quality and quantity of land, the climate, organization of small farms and provision of irrigation systems can guarantee an increase in all agricultural and traditional arboriculture produce in the region. Given the past experiences, we can assume that productivity could be increased by at least 100–200 per cent. This can also be said for the traditional produce of animal husbandry, given the adequate pastures and fodder.
POTENTIAL FOR NEW AND LESS DEVELOPED PRODUCE IN THE AREAThe experience of businesses that have been tested has demonstrated the potential for marketing the commune’s less developed produce. The quality of this produce is guaranteed by the quality and quantity of the local water resources, the rich fauna and flora and an adequate size and relief appropriate for their cultivation.
APPLICATION OF MODELS OF COOPERATION BETWEEN FARMERSOne opportunity for improvement of the economic development of the region lies in the exploitation of international experiences in organization of cooperation for production, processing and trade of farming produce. This opportunity would be facilitated by professional and managerial development that will be provided with the support of the local and central authorities.
26
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
DEVELOPMENT OF GATHERING, PROCESSING AND TRADING BUSINESSESBusinesses that process agricultural and farming produce, and collect and trade are identified as necessary for the economic development of the region. Such businesses are essential because various products can be processed near to the point of production, reducing costs of transportation with access to the market for individual products difficult and expensive to ensure. Such businesses may encourage increased farm productivity, as planning, access to the market and sale of the produce are facilitated.
t—threats and ways to neutralize them
DELAYS TO ESSENTIAL IMPROVEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTUREDelays to improvement of road infrastructure and of water and electricity supplies, as well as failure to realise plans designed for the irrigation and drainage systems would, as these are the main reasons for the slow pace of the region’s development, have the effect of discouraging farmers to take initiatives that would increase productivity and transform their activities into businesses with guaranteed profits. Given that such improvements have considerable costs and still the only financial sources are the central authorities and foreign donors, there is a great risk of not achieving these objectives in a timely manner. The local authorities must do their part in preparing the necessary documentation and in undertaking adequate lobbying for their goals to be reached based on the strategic development plan.
LACK OF COMMITMENT OF FARMERS IN COMMON INITIATIVESAnother serious threat is the low engagement of farmers in common initiatives, due to mistrust or misunderstanding of the importance of such initiatives. It is the responsibility of the local authorities to raise awareness and provide training to increase farmers’ understanding for them to improve their management and planning skills. Such initiatives should be integral parts of the short-term strategic plans. It is also suggested that reliable studies be performed that increase reliance on achievement of common initiatives that aim at the development of their businesses.
EMIGRATION OF YOUNG QUALIFIED WORKFORCEAnother risk is emigration of qualified residents, whether abroad or to large conurbations. There are many people who for economic reasons would prefer to leave their property in the commune. This part of the population is very active and their emigration represents a real loss for the community. Materialization of research and training for local residents in business development opportunities with considerable profits, sometimes higher than the income they might gain from emigrating, is here emphasised.
27
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATIONDegradation of agricultural land, forests, pastures and other assets important to farming development must be fully understood if it is to be reversed. Measures must be taken quickly to stop this phenomenon and improve the situation. The creation of a climate of confidence in the success of local businesses as well as centralized investments will develop the appropriate conditions.
INADEQUATE ENGAGEMENT OF CENTRAL AUTHORITIES TO IMPROVE THE SITUATIONOne more threat to be considered and discouraged as soon as possible is inadequate engagement of either local or central public administrations. The situation is exacerbated by the issue of the construction of the Skavica hydroelectric power station, a project that is currently in abeyance. The construction of a lake for the power station would inundate most areas of some villages. It is essential to study and include in the strategic plans possible solutions to prevent the damaging social effects and harmful consequences.
28
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
mat
rix
of th
e st
rate
gic
Plan
X. B
y 20
15, F
ushë
Çid
hën
Com
mun
e w
ill b
e fo
cusi
ng o
n in
crea
sing
agr
icul
tura
l and
farm
ing
prod
uctio
n, e
xplo
iting
effe
ctiv
ely
its re
sour
ces a
nd p
rovi
ding
qua
lity
infr
astru
ctur
e, a
pla
ce w
here
the
envi
ronm
ent a
nd c
oope
ratio
n be
twee
n bu
sine
ss a
nd lo
cal a
utho
ritie
s is e
ffect
ive
in o
rder
to e
ncou
rage
regu
lar s
elf-
empl
oym
ent a
nd
to e
nsur
e a
stab
le m
arke
t for
the
com
mun
e’s p
rodu
cts
Goa
lFi
eld
obj
ectiv
ePr
ogra
mm
ePr
ojec
tn
o.
G1: Provision of contemporary governance ensuring an effective and efficient administration of public assets and creating adequate conditions for stable human, social and economic
development of the commune
Governance and administration
1.1
Mod
erni
zatio
n of
com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
to m
eet
qual
itativ
ely
the
dem
ands
of
the
com
mun
ity a
nd th
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent o
f th
e co
mm
une
1.1.
1 In
fras
truct
ure
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
of c
omm
une
adm
inis
tratio
n bu
ildin
g an
d in
stal
latio
n of
nec
es-
sary
equ
ipm
ent
1
Fenc
ing
and
gree
ning
of a
rea
surr
ound
ing
com
mun
e bu
ildin
g2
Cre
atio
n of
recr
eatio
nal p
ark
in R
renx
Vill
age
3
1.1.
2 En
viro
nmen
tal
prot
ectio
n
Prot
ectio
n an
d gr
eeni
ng o
f ban
ks o
f Pra
ma
stre
am4
Ref
ores
tatio
n of
com
mun
e5
Bui
ldin
g of
sew
age
syst
em in
Blli
ce V
illag
e6
Con
clus
ion
of p
roje
ct o
n co
mm
une
fore
stry
pro
tect
ion
and
mai
nten
ance
7
1.1.
3 Pr
ofes
sion
al d
e-ve
lopm
ent
Impr
ovin
g fin
ance
and
boo
kkee
ping
in c
omm
une
adm
inis
tratio
n by
intro
duc-
tion
of A
LFA
acc
ount
ing
softw
are
8
Trai
ning
of c
omm
une
empl
oyee
s and
adv
isor
s9
Esta
blis
hmen
t of P
rofe
ssio
nal D
evel
opm
ent U
nit i
n th
e co
mm
une
10
1.1.
4 C
arry
ing
out
rese
arch
Rese
arch
into
eco
nom
ic a
nd so
cial
effe
cts o
f con
struc
tion
of H
EC in
Ska
vica
11R
egis
tratio
n of
pub
lic p
rope
rty a
nd u
nder
taki
ng o
f res
earc
h of
how
to m
anag
e it
effic
ient
ly12
Car
ryin
g ou
t res
earc
h in
to se
wag
e an
d po
tabl
e w
ater
syst
ems m
anag
emen
t13
Res
earc
h in
to d
iffer
entia
l sys
tem
of l
ocal
taxe
s and
fees
14
education and Pro-fessional develop-
ment
1.2
Impr
ovem
ent o
f the
teac
h-in
g pr
oces
s and
dev
elop
-m
ent o
f the
cap
aciti
es o
f em
ploy
ees w
orki
ng in
the
mos
t im
porta
nt e
cono
mic
en
terp
rises
1.2.
1 Sc
hool
phy
sica
l in
fras
truct
ure
Esta
blis
hmen
t of l
itera
ry a
nd sc
ient
ific
libra
ry fo
r the
seco
ndar
y sc
hool
15Fe
ncin
g an
d gr
eeni
ng o
f prim
ary
scho
ol in
Fus
he A
lie16
Fenc
ing
and
gree
ning
of e
lem
enta
ry sc
hool
in R
renx
17Fe
ncin
g an
d gr
eeni
ng o
f prim
ary
scho
ol in
Blli
ce18
1.2.
2 Pr
ofes
sion
al d
e-ve
lopm
ent
Prov
isio
n of
qua
lifica
tion
cour
se in
live
stoc
k br
eedi
ng19
Prov
isio
n of
a q
ualifi
catio
n co
urse
in a
gric
ultu
re a
nd fr
uit g
row
ing
20Pr
ovisi
on o
f a q
ualifi
catio
n co
urse
for b
eeke
eper
s and
med
icin
al p
lant
culti
vato
rs21
health
1.3
Prov
isio
n of
a n
orm
al p
ri-m
ary
heal
th se
rvic
e fo
r all
com
mun
e re
side
nts
1.3.
1 H
ealth
serv
ice
infr
astru
ctur
e
Prov
isio
n of
ess
entia
l med
ical
equ
ipm
ent f
or H
ealth
Cen
tre a
nd c
linic
s 22
Prov
isio
n of
am
bula
nce
for H
ealth
Cen
tre23
Prov
isio
n of
refr
iger
ator
s for
safe
guar
ding
vac
cine
s in
clin
ics
241.
3.2
Prof
essio
nal d
evel-
opm
ent
Trai
ning
of m
edic
al st
aff
25
1.3.
3 Pu
blic
aw
aren
ess
Prod
uctio
n of
boo
klet
s inf
orm
ing
peop
le o
f hea
lth is
sues
and
pro
blem
s26
29
Goa
lFi
eld
obj
ectiv
ePr
ogra
mm
ePr
ojec
tn
o.
G2: Provision of public infrastructure and services of good quality in the whole commune, in order to anticipate and support the economic and social development
of the commune
transport and telecommunications
2.1
Org
aniz
atio
n of
tran
spor
t ser
vice
fo
r peo
ple
and
good
s, an
d m
ak-
ing
avai
labl
e co
mm
unic
atio
ns
and
info
rmat
ion
serv
ices
to
satis
fy th
e de
velo
ping
dem
ands
of
the
com
mun
ity
2.1.
1 O
rgan
izat
ion
of tr
ansp
ort
Org
aniz
atio
n of
tran
spor
t with
com
mun
e’s p
rivat
e ve
hicl
es o
wne
rs27
Prov
isio
n of
scho
ol tr
ansp
ort
28
2.1.
2 Te
leco
mm
u-ni
catio
ns in
fra-
stru
ctur
e
Des
ign
and
setti
ng u
p of
cab
le p
hone
con
nect
ion
with
nat
iona
l net
wor
k, a
nd
func
tioni
ng o
f the
pos
tal s
ervi
ce29
Erec
tion
of te
levi
sion
mas
t for
bro
adca
stin
g of
pub
lic te
levi
sion
cha
nnel
s30
Road infrastructure
2.2
Ach
ieve
men
t of n
orm
al st
and-
ards
of r
oad
infr
astru
ctur
e in
the
com
mun
e
2.2.
1 R
oad
infr
a-st
ruct
ure
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
of 2
5 km
of r
ural
road
s31
Asp
halti
ng o
f 6 k
m ro
ad fr
om c
omm
une
cent
re to
mai
n ro
ad32
Con
stru
ctio
n of
two
inne
r roa
ds in
the
com
mun
e33
Con
stru
ctio
n of
a fo
otbr
idge
ove
r Gra
ma
Stre
am34
Water and electricity supply
2.3
Ach
ieve
men
t of n
orm
al st
and-
ards
of w
ater
and
ele
ctric
ity
supp
ly sy
stem
s
2.3.
1 C
arry
ing
out
rese
arch
Car
ryin
g ou
t res
earc
h in
to p
ossi
bilit
y of
con
stru
ctio
n of
HEC
alo
ng G
ram
a St
ream
35
2.3.
2 W
ater
supp
ly
infr
astru
ctur
eC
ompl
etio
n of
con
stru
ctio
n of
wat
er su
pply
syst
em in
Sop
onik
a36
30
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Goa
lFi
eld
obj
ectiv
ePr
ogra
mm
ePr
ojec
tn
o.
G3: Increase in choice and stability of production, processing and trading in the commune, ex-ploiting the natural potential and advantages of the area with effective models of cooperation with
business
agriculture
3.1
Prov
isio
n of
opt
imal
phy
sica
l inf
rast
ruc-
ture
and
impr
ovem
ent o
f far
mer
s’ kn
owl-
edge
in th
e au
gmen
tatio
n of
agr
icul
tura
l pr
oduc
ts, e
xplo
iting
max
imal
ly th
e com
-m
une’
s tra
ditio
n an
d po
tent
ial
3.1.
1 C
apac
ity
build
ing
Prov
isio
n of
trai
ning
cou
rses
in a
gric
ultu
re, i
nclu
ding
use
of a
gric
ultu
ral m
a-ch
iner
y37
Esta
blis
hmen
t of A
gric
ultu
re F
arm
ers’
Ass
ocia
tion
383.
1.2
Car
ryin
g ou
t re
sear
chC
arry
ing
out s
tudy
on
incr
easi
ng p
rodu
ctio
n fr
om tr
aditi
onal
frui
t-gro
win
g in
ac
cord
ance
with
mar
ket d
eman
ds
39
3.1.
3 Ir
rigat
ion
infr
astru
ctur
e
Con
stru
ctio
n of
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
for F
ush
Alie
40R
econ
stru
ctio
n of
two
irrig
atio
n di
tche
s in
Blli
ce41
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
of re
serv
oir i
n R
renx
e42
Farming
3.2
Incr
ease
in
volu
me
and
qual
ity o
f tra
-di
tiona
l st
ockb
reed
ing,
mai
nly
cattl
e,
and
of f
arm
ing
prod
uce,
enc
oura
ging
in
crea
se in
leve
l of p
roce
ssin
g
3.2.
1 C
arry
ing
out
rese
arch
Car
ryin
g ou
t res
earc
h in
to c
attle
bre
ed im
prov
emen
t43
3.2.
2 Pr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
Prov
isio
n of
qua
lifica
tion
cour
ses i
n ca
ttle
bree
d im
prov
emen
t44
3.2.
3 Ve
terin
ary
serv
ice
Perio
dic
stan
dard
vac
cina
tion
of c
attle
45
3.2.
4 St
imul
atio
n of
farm
ing
busi
-ne
sses
Esta
blis
hmen
t of t
wo
min
i far
ms f
or li
vest
ock
bree
ding
46
Esta
blis
hmen
t of L
ives
tock
Far
mer
s’ A
ssoc
iatio
n47
Businesses
3.3
Incr
ease
of
choi
ce a
nd s
tabi
lity
of p
ro-
duct
ion,
pro
cess
ing
and
tradi
ng i
n th
e co
mm
une,
exp
loiti
ng it
s na
tura
l pot
en-
tial a
nd a
dvan
tage
s an
d us
e of
effe
ctiv
e m
odel
s of b
usin
ess c
oope
ratio
n
3.3.
1 St
imul
a-tio
n fo
r set
ting
up
busi
ness
Con
stru
ctio
n of
dai
ries i
n B
llica
and
Fus
h A
lie v
illag
es48
Esta
blis
hmen
t of m
arke
t for
trad
e in
agr
icul
tura
l and
live
stoc
k pr
oduc
e49
Esta
blis
hmen
t of c
entre
for p
rovi
sion
of s
ervi
ces a
bsen
t in
the
com
mun
e50
Enco
urag
emen
t for
ope
ning
of s
ouve
nir s
hop
51
3.3.
2 C
arry
ing
out
rese
arch
Und
erta
king
of s
tudy
into
act
ivat
ion
and
enco
urag
emen
t of h
andi
craf
t pro
d-uc
ts52
Und
erta
king
of
rese
arch
into
pot
entia
l of
culti
vatio
n an
d pr
oces
sing
of
me-
dici
nal h
erbs
53
3.3.
3 Pr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
Prov
isio
n of
a c
ours
e on
fina
ncia
l man
agem
ent o
f sm
all f
arm
s54
tourism
3.4
Prov
isio
n of
ade
quat
e co
nditi
ons
to d
e-ve
lop
eco-
tour
ism
, mou
ntai
n an
d fa
mily
to
uris
m
3.4.
1 Pr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
Car
ryin
g ou
t a s
tudy
for i
dent
ifica
tion
of p
oten
tial o
ppor
tuni
ties
for d
evel
op-
men
t of t
ouris
m
55
Car
ryin
g ou
t a tr
aini
ng c
ours
e on
eco
-tour
ism
, mou
ntai
n an
d fa
mily
tour
ism
.56
3.4.
2 Su
ppor
ting
infr
astru
ctur
eC
onst
ruct
ion
of a
lpin
e ro
ad t
o Sl
love
Gra
me
(Kor
ab)
in c
oope
ratio
n w
ith
Sllo
va C
omm
une
57
31
Goa
lFi
eld
obj
ectiv
ePr
ogra
mm
ePr
ojec
tn
o.
G3: Increase in choice and stability of production, processing and trading in the commune, ex-ploiting the natural potential and advantages of the area with effective models of cooperation with
business
agriculture
3.1
Prov
isio
n of
opt
imal
phy
sica
l inf
rast
ruc-
ture
and
impr
ovem
ent o
f far
mer
s’ kn
owl-
edge
in th
e au
gmen
tatio
n of
agr
icul
tura
l pr
oduc
ts, e
xplo
iting
max
imal
ly th
e com
-m
une’
s tra
ditio
n an
d po
tent
ial
3.1.
1 C
apac
ity
build
ing
Prov
isio
n of
trai
ning
cou
rses
in a
gric
ultu
re, i
nclu
ding
use
of a
gric
ultu
ral m
a-ch
iner
y37
Esta
blis
hmen
t of A
gric
ultu
re F
arm
ers’
Ass
ocia
tion
383.
1.2
Car
ryin
g ou
t re
sear
chC
arry
ing
out s
tudy
on
incr
easi
ng p
rodu
ctio
n fr
om tr
aditi
onal
frui
t-gro
win
g in
ac
cord
ance
with
mar
ket d
eman
ds
39
3.1.
3 Ir
rigat
ion
infr
astru
ctur
e
Con
stru
ctio
n of
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
for F
ush
Alie
40R
econ
stru
ctio
n of
two
irrig
atio
n di
tche
s in
Blli
ce41
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
of re
serv
oir i
n R
renx
e42
Farming
3.2
Incr
ease
in
volu
me
and
qual
ity o
f tra
-di
tiona
l st
ockb
reed
ing,
mai
nly
cattl
e,
and
of f
arm
ing
prod
uce,
enc
oura
ging
in
crea
se in
leve
l of p
roce
ssin
g
3.2.
1 C
arry
ing
out
rese
arch
Car
ryin
g ou
t res
earc
h in
to c
attle
bre
ed im
prov
emen
t43
3.2.
2 Pr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
Prov
isio
n of
qua
lifica
tion
cour
ses i
n ca
ttle
bree
d im
prov
emen
t44
3.2.
3 Ve
terin
ary
serv
ice
Perio
dic
stan
dard
vac
cina
tion
of c
attle
45
3.2.
4 St
imul
atio
n of
farm
ing
busi
-ne
sses
Esta
blis
hmen
t of t
wo
min
i far
ms f
or li
vest
ock
bree
ding
46
Esta
blis
hmen
t of L
ives
tock
Far
mer
s’ A
ssoc
iatio
n47
Businesses
3.3
Incr
ease
of
choi
ce a
nd s
tabi
lity
of p
ro-
duct
ion,
pro
cess
ing
and
tradi
ng i
n th
e co
mm
une,
exp
loiti
ng it
s na
tura
l pot
en-
tial a
nd a
dvan
tage
s an
d us
e of
effe
ctiv
e m
odel
s of b
usin
ess c
oope
ratio
n
3.3.
1 St
imul
a-tio
n fo
r set
ting
up
busi
ness
Con
stru
ctio
n of
dai
ries i
n B
llica
and
Fus
h A
lie v
illag
es48
Esta
blis
hmen
t of m
arke
t for
trad
e in
agr
icul
tura
l and
live
stoc
k pr
oduc
e49
Esta
blis
hmen
t of c
entre
for p
rovi
sion
of s
ervi
ces a
bsen
t in
the
com
mun
e50
Enco
urag
emen
t for
ope
ning
of s
ouve
nir s
hop
51
3.3.
2 C
arry
ing
out
rese
arch
Und
erta
king
of s
tudy
into
act
ivat
ion
and
enco
urag
emen
t of h
andi
craf
t pro
d-uc
ts52
Und
erta
king
of
rese
arch
into
pot
entia
l of
culti
vatio
n an
d pr
oces
sing
of
me-
dici
nal h
erbs
53
3.3.
3 Pr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
Prov
isio
n of
a c
ours
e on
fina
ncia
l man
agem
ent o
f sm
all f
arm
s54
tourism
3.4
Prov
isio
n of
ade
quat
e co
nditi
ons
to d
e-ve
lop
eco-
tour
ism
, mou
ntai
n an
d fa
mily
to
uris
m
3.4.
1 Pr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
Car
ryin
g ou
t a s
tudy
for i
dent
ifica
tion
of p
oten
tial o
ppor
tuni
ties
for d
evel
op-
men
t of t
ouris
m
55
Car
ryin
g ou
t a tr
aini
ng c
ours
e on
eco
-tour
ism
, mou
ntai
n an
d fa
mily
tour
ism
.56
3.4.
2 Su
ppor
ting
infr
astru
ctur
eC
onst
ruct
ion
of a
lpin
e ro
ad t
o Sl
love
Gra
me
(Kor
ab)
in c
oope
ratio
n w
ith
Sllo
va C
omm
une
57
Form
s on
stra
tegi
c de
velo
pmen
tX
i.
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
e
deV
eLo
Pmen
t se
cto
RPu
BL
ic a
dm
inis
tR
atio
na
imPr
ovis
ion
of c
onte
mpo
rary
gov
erna
nce
ensu
ring
an e
ffect
ive
and
effic
ient
adm
inis
tratio
n of
pub
lic a
sset
s an
d cr
eatin
g ad
equa
te
cond
ition
s for
stab
le h
uman
, soc
ial a
nd e
cono
mic
dev
elop
men
t of t
he c
omm
une
oB
Jec
tiV
ePR
oG
Ra
mm
e1
Mod
erni
zatio
n of
com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
to m
eet q
ualit
ativ
ely
the
dem
ands
of t
he c
omm
unity
an
d th
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent o
f the
com
mun
eIn
fras
truct
ure
Envi
ronm
enta
l pro
tect
ion
Prof
essi
onal
dev
elop
men
tC
arry
ing
out r
esea
rch
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
-tio
n pe
riod
app
roxi
mat
e co
st (l
ekë)
impl
e-m
ente
rc
ontr
ibut
or1
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
of c
omm
une
adm
inis
tratio
n bu
ildin
g an
d in
stal
latio
n of
the
nece
ssar
y eq
uipm
ent
2Fe
ncin
g an
d gr
eeni
ng o
f are
a su
rrou
ndin
g co
mm
une
build
ing
3Im
prov
ing
finan
ce a
nd b
ookk
eepi
ng in
com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
by in
trodu
ctio
n of
ALF
A a
ccou
ntin
g so
ftwar
e4
Cre
atio
n of
recr
eatio
nal p
ark
in R
renx
Vill
age
5Pr
otec
tion
and
gree
ning
of b
anks
of P
ram
a st
ream
6R
efor
esta
tion
of c
omm
une
7B
uild
ing
of se
wag
e sy
stem
in B
llice
Vill
age
8Tr
aini
ng o
f com
mun
e em
ploy
ees a
nd a
dvis
ors
9Es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f Pro
fess
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t Uni
t in
the
com
mun
e 10
Res
earc
h in
to e
cono
mic
and
soci
al e
ffect
s of c
onst
ruct
ion
of H
EC in
Ska
vica
11R
egis
tratio
n of
pub
lic p
rope
rties
and
und
erta
king
of r
esea
rch
of h
ow to
man
age
it ef
ficie
ntly
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
tory
no
tes
indi
cato
rQ
uan-
tity
uni
t20
0620
151
Num
ber o
f com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
empl
oyee
s12
181
2N
umbe
r of p
ublic
inst
itutio
ns o
pera
ting
in c
omm
une
35
3N
umbe
r of e
mpl
oyee
s in
publ
ic a
dmin
istra
tion
6380
4N
umbe
r of p
ensi
oner
s30
030
05
Publ
ic e
nter
pris
es (l
ist)
6N
umbe
r of c
ouns
ello
rs13
13n
atio
nal o
f Reg
iona
l sec
tori
al s
trat
egie
s and
Pla
ns a
f-fe
ctin
g th
is d
evel
opm
ent s
ecto
r7
Num
ber o
f sup
ervi
sors
44
1n
atio
nal s
trat
egy
of e
cono
mic
and
socia
l dev
elopm
ent
he
ad
oF
co
mm
un
ea
rani
t ske
pi
32
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eV
eL
oPm
en
t se
cto
Ra
GR
icu
Ltu
Re
aim
Incr
ease
in c
hoic
e an
d st
abili
ty o
f pro
duct
ion,
pro
cess
ing
and
tradi
ng in
the
com
mun
e, e
xplo
iting
the
natu
ral p
oten
tial a
nd
adva
ntag
es o
f the
are
a w
ith e
ffect
ive
mod
els o
f coo
pera
tion
with
bus
ines
so
BJe
ct
iVe
PRo
GR
am
e
1Pr
ovis
ion
of o
ptim
al p
hysi
cal i
nfra
stru
ctur
e an
d im
prov
emen
t of f
arm
ers’
know
ledg
e in
th
e au
gmen
tatio
n of
agr
icul
tura
l pro
duct
s, ex
ploi
ting
max
imal
ly th
e co
mm
une
tradi
tion
and
pote
ntia
l
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
gC
arry
ing
out r
esea
rch
Irrig
atio
n in
fras
truct
ure
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
ple-
men
ter
con
trib
utor
1Pr
ovis
ion
of tr
aini
ng c
ours
es in
agr
icul
ture
, inc
ludi
ng u
se o
f agr
icul
tura
l mac
hine
ry
2C
arry
ing
out s
tudy
on
incr
easi
ng p
rodu
ctio
n fr
om tr
aditi
onal
frui
t-gro
win
g in
acc
orda
nce
with
m
arke
t dem
ands
3
Con
stru
ctio
n of
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
for F
ushe
Alie
4R
econ
stru
ctio
n of
two
irrig
atio
n di
tche
s in
Blli
ce5
Rec
onst
ruct
ion
of re
serv
oir i
n R
renx
e6
Con
clus
ion
of p
roje
ct o
n co
mm
une
fore
stry
pro
tect
ion
and
mai
nten
ance
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
-to
ry n
otes
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
2006
2015
1C
omm
une
area
1,50
01,
500
ha1
2A
gric
ultu
ral p
rodu
ctio
n ar
ea50
050
0ha
23
Orc
hard
s are
a10
100
ha3
4V
iney
ards
are
a10
100
ha5
Past
urag
e 50
050
0ha
6N
o. o
f mic
ro fa
rms
5020
07
Ann
ual v
eget
able
pro
duct
ion
1,00
03,
000
Kv
8A
nnua
l fru
it pr
oduc
tion
1,50
02,
000
Kv
9N
o. o
f pro
cess
ing
activ
ities
100
300
nat
iona
l of R
egio
nal s
ecto
rial
str
ateg
ies a
nd P
lans
aff
ectin
g th
is
dev
elop
men
t sec
tor
10N
o. o
f agr
icul
tura
l mac
hine
s10
4011
No.
of t
rans
port
vehi
cles
1320
1N
atio
nal S
trate
gy o
f Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elop
men
t2
Com
mun
e st
rate
gy d
evel
opm
ent
3K
Ry
eta
Ri i
Ko
mu
në
s Fu
shë
Çid
hë
na
rani
t ske
pi
33
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eV
eL
oPm
en
t se
cto
RFa
Rm
inG
aim
Incr
ease
in c
hoic
e an
d st
abili
ty o
f pro
duct
ion,
pro
cess
ing
and
tradi
ng in
the
com
mun
e, e
xplo
iting
the
natu
ral p
oten
tial a
nd
adva
ntag
es o
f the
are
a w
ith e
ffect
ive
mod
els o
f coo
pera
tion
with
bus
ines
so
BJe
ct
iVe
PRo
GR
am
eIn
crea
se in
vol
ume
and
qual
ity o
f tra
ditio
nal s
tock
bree
ding
, mai
nly
cattl
e, a
nd
of fa
rmin
g pr
oduc
e, e
ncou
ragi
ng in
crea
se in
leve
l of p
roce
ssin
gC
arry
ing
out r
esea
rch
Prof
essi
onal
dev
elop
men
tVe
terin
ary
serv
ice
Stim
ulat
ion
of fa
rmin
g bu
sine
sses
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
plem
ente
rc
ontr
ibut
or1
Con
stru
ctio
n of
dai
ries i
n B
llica
and
Fus
h A
lie v
illag
es20
0820
092
Esta
blis
hmen
t of t
wo
min
i far
ms f
or li
vest
ock
bree
ding
2008
2011
3Pr
ovis
ion
of q
ualifi
catio
n co
urse
s in
cattl
e br
eed
impr
ovem
ent
4Pe
riodi
c st
anda
rd v
acci
natio
n of
cat
tle
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
to-
ry n
otes
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
2006
2015
1C
omm
une
area
1,50
01,
500
ha1
2Fo
dder
pro
duct
ion
area
100
200
ha2
3Pa
stur
age
area
500
500
ha3
4N
o. o
f sm
alle
r liv
esto
ck5,
000
8,00
04
5N
o. o
f cat
tle1,
500
2,50
05
6N
o. o
f pou
ltry
3,00
05,
000
7N
o. o
f mic
ro-f
arm
s50
200
8A
nnua
l hon
ey p
rodu
ctio
n5
10K
v9
Ann
ual fi
sh p
rodu
ctio
n0
0K
vn
atio
nal o
f Reg
iona
l sec
tori
al s
trat
egie
s and
Pla
ns a
ffec
ting
this
dev
elop
-m
ent s
ecto
r10
Ann
ual v
eget
able
s pro
duct
ion
1,00
03,
000
Kv
11A
nnua
l fru
it pr
oduc
tion
1,50
02,
000
Kv
1N
atio
nal S
trate
gy o
f Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elop
men
t12
No.
of p
roce
ssin
g ac
tiviti
es1
32
Com
mun
e st
rate
gy d
evel
opm
ent
13N
o. o
f sto
ckbr
eede
rs10
030
0h
ea
d o
F Fu
shë
Çid
hë
n c
om
mu
ne
ara
nit s
kepi
34
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eV
eL
oPm
en
t se
cto
RR
oa
d in
FRa
stR
uc
tu
Re
aim
Prov
isio
n of
pub
lic in
fras
truct
ure
and
serv
ices
of g
ood
qual
ity in
the
who
le c
omm
une,
in o
rder
to a
ntic
ipat
e an
d su
ppor
t the
ec
onom
ic a
nd so
cial
dev
elop
men
t of t
he c
omm
une
oB
Jec
tiV
ePR
oG
Ra
me
1A
chie
vem
ent o
f nor
mal
stan
dard
s of r
oad
infr
astru
ctur
e in
the
com
mun
e R
oad
infr
astru
ctur
e
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
ple-
men
ter
con
trib
utor
1R
econ
stru
ctio
n of
25
km o
f rur
al ro
ads
2008
2010
15,0
00,0
002
Asp
halti
ng o
f 6 k
m ro
ad fr
om c
omm
une
cent
re to
mai
n ro
ad20
0820
1340
,000
,000
3C
onst
ruct
ion
of tw
o in
ner r
oads
in th
e co
mm
une
2008
2010
8,00
0,00
04
Con
stru
ctio
n of
a fo
otbr
idge
ove
r Gra
ma
Stre
am20
0820
095,
000,
000
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
tory
not
esin
dica
tor
Qua
ntity
uni
t20
0620
151
Leng
th o
f rur
al ro
ads
2530
kmC
onne
ctio
n w
ith
Lura
ext
ende
d 1
2R
econ
stru
cted
rura
l roa
dskm
23
Unr
econ
stru
cted
rura
l roa
ds25
0km
34
Leng
th o
f roa
d to
nea
rest
city
1212
km4
5In
tern
al ro
ads
45
km5
6Jo
urne
y tim
e fr
om n
eare
st c
ity1
0.5
hour
s6 7 nat
iona
l of R
egio
nal s
ecto
rial
str
ateg
ies a
nd P
lans
aff
ectin
g th
is
dev
elop
men
t sec
tor
1N
atio
nal E
cono
mic
and
Soc
ial D
evel
opm
ent S
trate
gy2
Com
mun
e D
evel
opm
ent S
trate
gy
h
ea
d o
F Fu
shë
Çid
hë
n c
om
mu
ne
ara
nit s
kepi
35
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eV
eL
oPm
en
t se
cto
RW
ate
R a
nd
eL
ec
tR
icit
y s
uPP
Lya
imPr
ovis
ion
of p
ublic
infr
astru
ctur
e an
d se
rvic
es o
f goo
d qu
ality
in th
e w
hole
com
mun
e, in
ord
er to
ant
icip
ate
and
supp
ort
the
econ
omic
and
soci
al d
evel
opm
ent o
f the
com
mun
eo
BJe
ct
iVe
PRo
GR
am
es
Ach
ieve
men
t of n
orm
al st
anda
rds o
f wat
er a
nd e
lect
ricity
supp
ly sy
stem
s C
arry
ing
out r
esea
rch
Wat
er su
pply
infr
astru
ctur
e
PRo
Jec
ts
impl
emen
ta-
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
plem
ente
rc
ontr
ibut
or
1C
arry
ing
out r
esea
rch
into
pos
sibi
lity
of c
onst
ruct
ion
of H
EC a
long
Gra
ma
Stre
am2
Car
ryin
g ou
t res
earc
h in
to se
wag
e an
d po
tabl
e w
ater
syst
ems m
anag
emen
t3
Com
plet
ion
of c
onst
ruct
ion
of w
ater
supp
ly sy
stem
in S
opon
ika
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
-to
ry n
otes
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
2006
2015
1N
o. o
f wat
er su
pplie
s2
4pi
eces
12
Supp
ly o
f pot
able
wat
er10
24ho
urs/
day
23
Hou
ses w
ith a
cces
s to
wat
er su
pply
5010
0%
34
Pota
ble
wat
er c
onsu
mpt
ion
4080
litre
/per
son
45
Pota
ble
wat
er fe
e30
030
0le
kë/m
onth
56
No.
of e
lect
ricity
cab
ins
710
7Av
erag
e co
nsum
ptio
n
kW
h/pe
rson
8A
mou
nt o
f ele
ctric
ity12
24ho
urs/
day
nat
iona
l of R
egio
nal s
ecto
rial
str
ateg
ies a
nd P
lans
aff
ectin
g th
is
dev
elop
men
t sec
tor
9El
ectri
city
pay
men
t lev
el90
100
%10
Con
sum
ptio
n of
pub
lic li
ghtin
g1
Nat
iona
l Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
11To
tal e
lect
ricity
con
sum
ptio
n2
Com
mun
e D
evel
opm
ent S
trate
gy
he
ad
oFF
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ea
rani
t ske
pi
36
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eV
eL
oPm
en
t se
cto
Re
du
cat
ion
an
d P
Ro
Fess
ion
aL
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
aim
Prov
isio
n of
con
tem
pora
ry g
over
nanc
e en
surin
g an
effe
ctiv
e an
d ef
ficie
nt a
dmin
istra
tion
of p
ublic
ass
ets a
nd c
reat
ing
ad-
equa
te c
ondi
tions
for s
tabl
e hu
man
, soc
ial a
nd e
cono
mic
dev
elop
men
t of t
he c
omm
une
oB
Jec
tiV
ePR
oG
Ra
me
sIm
prov
emen
t of t
he te
achi
ng p
roce
ss a
nd d
evel
opm
ent o
f the
cap
aciti
es o
f em
ploy
-ee
s wor
king
in th
e m
ost i
mpo
rtant
eco
nom
ic e
nter
pris
esSc
hool
phy
sica
l inf
rast
ruct
ure
Prof
essi
onal
dev
elop
men
t1
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
ple-
men
ter
con
trib
utor
1Es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f lite
rary
and
scie
ntifi
c lib
rary
for t
he se
cond
ary
scho
ol2
Fenc
ing
and
gree
ning
of p
rimar
y sc
hool
in F
ushe
Alie
3Fe
ncin
g an
d gr
eeni
ng o
f ele
men
tary
scho
ol in
Rre
nx4
Fenc
ing
and
gree
ning
of p
rimar
y sc
hool
in B
llice
5Pr
ovis
ion
of q
ualifi
catio
n co
urse
in li
vest
ock
bree
ding
6Pr
ovis
ion
of a
qua
lifica
tion
cour
se in
agr
icul
ture
and
frui
t gro
win
g7
Prov
isio
n of
a q
ualifi
catio
n co
urse
for b
eeke
eper
s and
med
icin
al p
lant
cul
tivat
ors
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
tory
no
tes
indi
cato
rQ
uan-
tity
uni
t20
0620
151
No.
of s
choo
ls6
61
2N
o. o
f pup
ils u
p to
8th
gra
de70
070
02
3N
o. o
f pup
ils n
ot a
ttend
ing
scho
ol0
03
4N
o. o
f pup
ils in
hig
her e
duca
tion
45
No.
of p
upils
per
cla
ss5
6N
o. o
f tea
cher
sn
atio
nal o
f Reg
iona
l sec
tori
al s
trat
egie
s and
Pla
ns a
ffec
ting
this
d
evel
opm
ent s
ecto
r1
Nat
iona
l Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
2C
omm
une
Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
he
ad
oF
Fush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ea
rani
t ske
pi
37
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eV
eL
oPm
en
t se
cto
Rh
ea
Lth
aim
Prov
isio
n of
con
tem
pora
ry g
over
nanc
e en
surin
g an
effe
ctiv
e an
d ef
ficie
nt a
dmin
istra
tion
of p
ublic
ass
ets a
nd c
reat
ing
ad-
equa
te c
ondi
tions
for s
tabl
e hu
man
, soc
ial a
nd e
cono
mic
dev
elop
men
t of t
he c
omm
une
oB
Jec
tiV
ePR
oG
Ra
me
1Pr
ovis
ion
of a
nor
mal
prim
ary
heal
th se
rvic
e fo
r all
com
mun
e re
side
nts
Hea
lth se
rvic
e in
fras
truct
ure
Prof
essi
onal
dev
elop
men
tPu
blic
aw
aren
ess
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
ple-
men
ter
con
trib
utor
1Pr
ovis
ion
of e
ssen
tial m
edic
al e
quip
men
t for
Hea
lth C
entre
and
clin
ics
2Pr
ovis
ion
of a
mbu
lanc
e fo
r Hea
lth C
entre
3Pr
ovis
ion
of re
frig
erat
ors f
or sa
fegu
ardi
ng v
acci
nes i
n cl
inic
s4
Trai
ning
of m
edic
al st
aff
5Pr
oduc
tion
of b
ookl
ets i
nfor
min
g pe
ople
of h
ealth
issu
es a
nd p
robl
ems
DE
VE
LOP
ME
NT
SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
tory
not
esin
dica
tor
Qua
n-tit
yu
nit
2006
2015
1N
o. o
f hea
lth p
erso
nnel
12
No.
of d
octo
rs2
3N
o. o
f am
bula
nces
34
No.
of h
ealth
cen
tres
45
Birt
hs6
Peop
le w
ith c
hron
ic d
isea
sen
atio
nal o
f Reg
iona
l sec
tori
al s
trat
egie
s and
Pla
ns a
ffec
ting
this
d
evel
opm
ent s
ecto
r1
Nat
iona
l Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
2C
omm
une
Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
he
ad
oF
Fush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ea
rani
t ske
pi
38
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eV
eL
oPm
en
t se
cto
RB
usi
ne
ss (t
Ra
din
G, P
Ro
du
ct
ion
, ha
nd
icR
aFt
s)a
imIn
crea
se in
cho
ice
and
stab
ility
of p
rodu
ctio
n, p
roce
ssin
g an
d tra
ding
in th
e co
mm
une,
exp
loiti
ng th
e na
tura
l pot
entia
l and
ad
vant
ages
of t
he a
rea
with
effe
ctiv
e m
odel
s of c
oope
ratio
n w
ith b
usin
ess
oB
Jec
tiV
ePR
oG
Ra
me
Incr
ease
of c
hoic
e an
d st
abili
ty o
f pro
duct
ion,
pro
cess
ing
and
tradi
ng in
the
com
mun
e,
expl
oitin
g its
nat
ural
pot
entia
l and
adv
anta
ges a
nd u
se o
f effe
ctiv
e m
odel
s of b
usin
ess
coop
erat
ion
Stim
ulat
ion
for s
ettin
g up
bus
ines
sC
arry
ing
out r
esea
rch
Prof
essi
onal
dev
elop
men
t
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
plem
ente
rc
ontr
ibut
or
1Es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f mar
ket f
or tr
ade
in a
gric
ultu
ral a
nd li
vest
ock
prod
uce
2R
esea
rch
into
diff
eren
tial s
yste
m o
f loc
al ta
xes a
nd fe
es3
Und
erta
king
of s
tudy
into
act
ivat
ion
and
enco
urag
emen
t of h
andi
craf
t pro
duct
s4
Enco
urag
emen
t for
ope
ning
of s
ouve
nir s
hop
5U
nder
taki
ng o
f res
earc
h in
to p
oten
tial o
f cul
tivat
ion
and
proc
essi
ng o
f med
icin
al h
erbs
6Pr
ovis
ion
of a
cou
rse
on fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t of s
mal
l far
ms
7Es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f Agr
icul
ture
Far
mer
s’ A
ssoc
iatio
n8
Esta
blis
hmen
t of L
ives
tock
Far
mer
s’ A
ssoc
iatio
n
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
tory
not
esin
dica
tor
Qua
ntity
uni
t20
0620
151
No.
of r
egis
tere
d bu
sine
sses
12
No.
of s
mal
l bus
ines
ses
23
No.
of a
gric
ultu
re b
usin
esse
s3
4N
o. o
f sto
ck-r
aisi
ng b
usin
esse
s4
5N
o. o
f pro
cess
ing
busi
ness
es5
6N
o. o
f han
dicr
aft b
usin
esse
sn
atio
nal o
f Reg
iona
l sec
tori
al s
trat
egie
s and
Pla
ns a
ffec
ting
this
d
evel
opm
ent s
ecto
r7
Prod
uctio
n of
sage
8H
azel
nut p
rodu
ctio
n1
Nat
iona
l Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
9Fr
uit p
rodu
ctio
n2
Reg
ion
Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
10
Hon
ey p
rodu
ctio
nh
ea
d o
F Fu
shë
Çid
hë
n c
om
mu
ne
ara
nit s
kepi
39
mid
te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eVeL
oPm
ent
sec
toR
tR
an
sPo
Rt
& t
eL
ec
om
mu
nic
atio
ns
aim
Prov
isio
n of
pub
lic in
fras
truct
ure
and
serv
ices
of g
ood
qual
ity in
the
who
le c
omm
une,
in o
rder
to a
ntic
ipat
e an
d su
ppor
t the
ec
onom
ic a
nd so
cial
dev
elop
men
t of t
he c
omm
une
oB
Jec
tiV
ePR
oG
Ra
me
Org
aniz
atio
n of
tran
spor
t ser
vice
for p
eopl
e an
d go
ods,
and
mak
ing
avai
labl
e co
mm
unic
atio
ns a
nd in
form
atio
n se
rvic
es to
satis
fy th
e de
velo
ping
dem
ands
of
the
com
mun
ity
Org
aniz
atio
n of
tran
spor
tTe
leco
mm
unic
atio
ns in
fras
truct
ure
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
ple-
men
ter
con
trib
utor
1O
rgan
izat
ion
of tr
ansp
ort w
ith c
omm
une’
s priv
ate
vehi
cles
ow
ners
2Pr
ovis
ion
of sc
hool
tran
spor
t 3
Des
ign
and
setti
ng u
p of
cab
le p
hone
con
nect
ion
with
nat
iona
l net
wor
k, a
nd fu
nctio
ning
of
the
post
al se
rvic
e4
Erec
tion
of te
levi
sion
mas
t for
bro
adca
stin
g of
pub
lic te
levi
sion
cha
nnel
s
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
tory
not
esin
dica
tor
Qua
ntity
uni
t20
0620
151
12
23
34
45
56
nat
iona
l of R
egio
nal s
ecto
rial
str
ateg
ies a
nd P
lans
aff
ectin
g th
is
dev
elop
men
t sec
tor
71
Nat
iona
l Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
2C
omm
une
Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
he
ad
oF
Fush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ea
rani
t ske
pi
40
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
mid
-te
Rm
de
Ve
Lo
Pme
nt
stR
ate
Gy
Fo
R F
ush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ed
eV
eL
oPm
en
t se
cto
Rto
uR
ism
aim
Incr
ease
of c
hoic
e an
d st
abili
ty o
f pro
duct
ion,
pro
cess
ing
and
tradi
ng in
the
com
mun
e, e
xplo
iting
nat
ural
pot
entia
ls, a
dvan
-ta
ges o
f the
are
a an
d th
e ef
fect
ive
mod
els o
f bus
ines
s coo
pera
tion
oB
Jec
tiV
ePR
oG
Ra
me
Prov
isio
n of
ade
quat
e co
nditi
ons t
o de
velo
p ec
o-to
uris
m, m
ount
ain
and
fam
ily
tour
ism
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
gSu
ppor
ting
infr
astru
ctur
e
PRo
Jec
tim
plem
enta
tion
peri
oda
ppro
xim
ate
cost
(lek
ë)im
plem
ente
rc
ontr
ibut
or
1C
arry
ing
out a
stud
y fo
r ide
ntifi
catio
n of
pot
entia
l opp
ortu
nitie
s for
dev
elop
men
t of t
ouris
m
2C
arry
ing
out a
trai
ning
cou
rse
on e
co-to
uris
m, m
ount
ain
and
fam
ily to
uris
m.
3C
onst
ruct
ion
of a
lpin
e ro
ad to
Sllo
ve G
ram
e (K
orab
) in
coop
erat
ion
with
Sllo
va C
omm
une
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T SE
CTO
R IN
DIC
ATO
RS
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T M
EASU
RIN
G IN
DIC
ATO
RS
indi
cato
rQ
uant
ityu
nit
exp
lana
tory
not
esin
dica
tor
Qua
ntity
uni
t20
0620
151
No.
of h
otel
s0
51
2N
o. o
f bed
s in
hote
ls2
3N
o. o
f res
taur
ants
3
4N
o. o
f his
toric
al-c
ultu
ral
obje
cts
14
5N
o. o
f vis
itors
in th
e pa
st y
ear
6N
o. o
f bed
s in
fam
ily to
uris
m
7To
p to
uris
t attr
actio
n8
Inco
me
from
hot
el ta
xes
9Av
erag
e pr
ice
per h
otel
bed
nat
iona
l of R
egio
nal s
ecto
rial
str
ateg
ies a
nd P
lans
aff
ectin
g th
is
dev
elop
men
t sec
tor
10N
o. o
f hea
lth c
entre
s11
No.
of p
harm
acie
s1
Nat
iona
l Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Dev
elop
men
t Stra
tegy
12N
o. o
f pen
al a
cts i
n pa
st y
ear
32
Com
mun
e D
evel
opm
ent S
trate
gy
13N
o. o
f sou
veni
r sho
ps0
13
Nat
iona
l Tou
rism
Stra
tegy
he
ad
oF
Fush
ë Ç
idh
ën
co
mm
un
ea
rani
t ske
pi
41
Project fichesXii.
Project fiches are a very helpful tool in strategic planning. They enable all actors involved in project implementation to easily understand a planned project. Fiches summarise a project’s importance, the proposed participants and target groups, benefits and phases towards implementation, providing information for the local decision-makers, central authorities or financial institutions and other donors during project implementation. In essence the fiches pool the core information. Practically, these forms can be used to attract the interest of other potential actors during the implementation process.
42
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e G
1.o
1.P1
.Pr1
obj
ectiv
e:R
econ
stru
ctio
n of
com
mun
e ad
min
istr
atio
n bu
ildin
g an
d in
stal
latio
n of
nec
essa
ry
equi
pmen
tm
oder
niza
tion
of c
omm
une
adm
inis
trat
ion
to m
eet q
ualit
ativ
ely
the
dem
ands
of t
he c
omm
unity
and
the
econ
omic
dev
elop
men
t of
the
com
mun
esh
ort p
roje
ct d
escr
iptio
n:Th
roug
h th
is p
roje
ct th
e pr
ovis
ion
of a
dequ
ate
wor
king
con
ditio
ns fo
r the
adm
inis
tratio
n’s e
mpl
oyee
s will
be
achi
eved
. For
real
izat
ion
of th
is p
roje
ct, t
he fo
llow
ing
step
s will
be
take
n:1.
Pre
para
tion
of p
roje
ct a
nd e
stim
ate
for r
econ
stru
ctio
n of
the
build
ing
2. Id
entifi
catio
n of
nee
ds fo
r offi
ce e
quip
men
t in
ever
y of
fice
and
for e
very
job
posi
tion
3. M
arke
t res
earc
h un
derta
ken
for c
alcu
latin
g th
e fu
nd n
eces
sary
for p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
4. A
naly
sis o
f fina
ncia
l opp
ortu
nitie
s and
pro
visi
on o
f ade
quat
e fu
nds
5. C
arry
ing
out o
f pro
cure
men
t pro
cedu
res f
or th
e re
cons
truct
ion
and
for t
he n
eces
sary
equ
ipm
ent
6. Im
plem
enta
tion
of re
cons
truct
ion
acco
rdin
g to
the
proj
ect a
nd th
e pl
an7.
Inst
alla
tion
of e
quip
men
t in
appr
opria
te p
lace
sD
urin
g ne
eds a
naly
sis t
he p
rosp
ectiv
e of
pos
sibl
e de
velo
pmen
ts in
the
com
mun
e w
ill b
e ta
ken
into
con
side
ratio
n in
ord
er to
pre
-em
pt th
e sh
ort-t
erm
nee
ds.
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Ade
quat
e co
nditi
ons f
or a
dmin
istra
tion
empl
oyee
s pro
vide
dC
omm
une
adm
inis
tratio
nC
omm
unity
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees
Win
ning
com
pany
for p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial d
onor
s
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Nee
ds a
nd m
arke
t res
earc
h on
nec
essa
ry e
quip
men
tA
ppro
val o
f ade
quat
e fu
nds
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
to im
plem
ent p
roje
ctN
eglig
ence
by
loca
l adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
For o
ffice
furn
iture
(
) le
këFo
r ele
ctro
nics
dev
ices
(
) le
këto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
010
2010
43
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e G
1.o
1.P3
.Pr8
obj
ectiv
e:Im
prov
ed fi
nanc
e an
d bo
okke
epin
g in
com
mun
e ad
min
istr
atio
n by
intr
oduc
tion
of
aL
Fa a
ccou
ntin
g so
ftw
are
mod
erni
zatio
n of
com
mun
e ad
min
istr
atio
n to
mee
t qua
litat
ivel
y th
e de
man
ds o
f the
com
mun
ity a
nd th
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent o
f th
e co
mm
une
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
This
pro
ject
con
sist
s in
the
appl
icat
ion
of th
e ALF
A sy
stem
in th
e ad
min
istra
tion’
s boo
kkee
ping
. It w
ill e
nabl
e di
gita
lizat
ion
of th
e ac
coun
ts.
For r
ealiz
atio
n of
this
pro
ject
, the
follo
win
g st
eps w
ill b
e fo
llow
ed: 1
. Dev
elop
men
t of m
arke
t res
earc
h in
ord
er to
ena
ble
the
sele
ctio
n of
loca
l com
pani
es o
fferin
g di
ffere
nt se
rvic
es a
nd e
stab
lish
the
limit
of fu
nds;
2. D
eter
min
atio
n of
job
posi
tions
for t
he p
rogr
amm
e im
plem
enta
tion,
as w
ell a
s ind
ivid
uals
that
will
rece
ive
train
-in
g, a
nd sy
stem
atiz
atio
n of
exi
stin
g fin
anci
al d
ata;
3. D
evel
opm
ent o
f pro
cure
men
t pro
cedu
res f
or p
rovi
sion
of s
ervi
ces,
such
as i
nsta
llatio
n, tr
aini
ng a
nd a
pplic
a-tio
n of
ALF
A so
ftwar
e in
the
Com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
netw
ork;
4. I
nsta
llatio
n of
softw
are
and
copy
ing
of e
xist
ing
data
from
the
data
base
, thr
ough
ass
ista
nce
of
the
win
ning
com
pany
; 5. T
rain
ing
of a
dmin
istra
tion
empl
oyee
s and
two
othe
rs o
utsi
de th
e ad
min
istra
tion
in u
se o
f the
softw
are;
6. C
ontra
ct a
nnua
lly fo
r sof
twar
e m
aint
enan
ce. T
his s
oftw
are
will
faci
litat
e fin
anci
al a
nd b
ookk
eepi
ng p
roce
dure
s, in
clud
ing
the
econ
omic
bal
ance
of t
he c
omm
une,
and
will
als
o he
lp in
pla
nnin
g an
d im
plem
entin
g of
the
inco
me
plan
s. Th
roug
h th
e us
e of
this
softw
are
it w
ill b
e po
ssib
le to
pro
duce
acc
urat
e do
cum
ents
and
mat
eria
ls o
f con
tem
pora
ry fi
nanc
ial fi
elds
in
a sh
ort t
ime
and
acco
rdin
g to
con
tem
pora
ry st
anda
rds.
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees b
ette
r ski
lled
Fina
ncia
l dat
abas
e es
tabl
ishe
dFi
nanc
ial d
ocum
ents
pro
duce
d w
ithin
a sh
ort t
ime
Con
tem
pora
ry q
ualit
y of
doc
umen
ts a
nd p
reci
se c
omm
unic
atio
n w
ith in
stitu
tions
Com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
Com
mun
ityC
omm
une
rela
ted
inst
itutio
ns
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Adm
inis
tratio
n’s fi
nanc
e em
ploy
ees
Win
ning
com
pany
for p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial d
onor
s
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Mar
ket r
esea
rch
App
rova
l of a
dequ
ate
fund
sSe
lect
ion
of e
mpl
oyee
s to
be tr
aine
d in
use
of t
he so
ftwar
ePr
ovis
ion
of c
ompu
ters
with
nec
essa
ry p
aram
eter
s
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
to im
plem
ent t
he p
roje
ctN
eglig
ence
of l
ocal
adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees
Syst
emat
izat
ion
of e
xist
ing
data
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
For i
nsta
llatio
n of
the
prog
ram
me
in tw
o jo
b po
sitio
ns a
nd n
etw
ork
setu
p (
) lek
ëFo
r in-
serv
ice
train
ing
of fo
ur e
mpl
oyee
s (
) lek
ëFo
r one
-yea
r mai
nten
ance
con
tract
bey
ond
guar
ante
e (
) lek
ëto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:d
urin
g ye
ar 2
008
Las
t fou
r m
onth
s of y
ear
2008
44
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e G
1.o
2.P3
.Pr9
obj
ectiv
e:tr
aini
ng o
f com
mun
e em
ploy
ees a
nd a
dvis
ers
mod
erni
zatio
n of
com
mun
e ad
min
istr
atio
n to
mee
t qua
litat
ivel
y th
e de
man
ds o
f the
com
mun
ity a
nd th
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent o
f th
e co
mm
une
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
Thro
ugh
this
pro
ject
trai
ning
of t
he a
dmin
istra
tion
advi
sers
and
em
ploy
ees w
ill b
e ca
rrie
d ou
t in
orde
r to
mee
t con
tem
pora
ry re
quire
men
ts.
For r
ealiz
atio
n of
this
pro
ject
, the
follo
win
g st
eps w
ill b
e fo
llow
ed:
1. In
dica
tion
of tr
aini
ng n
eeds
in c
oope
ratio
n w
ith th
e Alb
ania
n A
ssoc
iatio
n of
Com
mun
es (A
AC
), D
ibra
dis
trict
, SN
V, e
tc.
2. In
dica
tion
of p
oten
tial o
f AA
C, D
ibra
dis
trict
, SN
V, e
tc.,
to su
ppor
t the
trai
ning
acc
ordi
ng to
the
iden
tified
them
es3.
Ana
lysi
s of fi
nanc
ial c
apac
ities
to p
rovi
de th
e ne
cess
ary
train
ing
that
can
not b
e pr
ovid
ed b
y pa
rtner
inst
itutio
ns4.
Des
ign
of g
raph
ic fo
r tra
inin
g ac
cord
ing
to su
bjec
t and
pla
n pa
rtici
patio
n5.
Car
ryin
g ou
t of t
rain
ing
and
arch
ivin
g of
trai
ning
mat
eria
ls a
long
with
resp
ectiv
e re
port
and
prop
osal
s tha
t em
erge
Dur
ing
the
sear
ch fo
r ess
entia
ls, t
he p
rosp
ectiv
e of
pos
sibl
e de
velo
pmen
ts in
the
com
mun
e w
ill a
lso
be c
onsi
dere
d in
ord
er to
pre
-em
pt th
e sh
ort-t
erm
nec
essi
ties.
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees a
nd a
dvis
ers p
rofe
ssio
nally
dev
elop
edC
onte
mpo
rary
stan
dard
s atta
ined
in a
ll fie
lds o
f adm
inis
tratio
nC
omm
unity
satis
fact
ion
leve
l inc
reas
ed re
gard
ing
serv
ices
offe
red
by th
e co
mm
une
Com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
Com
mun
ity
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees
AA
C, d
istri
ct, S
NV,
etc
.
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial l
ocal
and
fore
ign
dono
rsLo
cal a
utho
rity
inst
itutio
nsPr
elim
inar
y co
nditi
ons:
Ris
k fa
ctor
s:R
esea
rch
into
nee
ds a
nd o
ppor
tuni
ties
App
rova
l of a
dequ
ate
fund
sD
esig
n of
trai
ning
gra
phic
s
Lack
of o
ppor
tuni
ties f
or c
arry
ing
out t
rain
ings
Neg
ligen
ce o
f loc
al a
dmin
istra
tion
empl
oyee
s
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
Per-d
iem
s, ac
com
mod
atio
n an
d tra
nspo
rt (
) lek
ëFo
r tra
inin
g pa
rtici
patio
n (
) lek
ëto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
010
aft
er e
ach
trai
ning
45
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e G
1.o
1.P3
.Pr1
0o
bjec
tive:
est
ablis
hmen
t of P
rofe
ssio
nal d
evel
opm
ent u
nit i
n th
e co
mm
une
mod
erni
zatio
n of
com
mun
e ad
min
istr
atio
n to
mee
t qua
litat
ivel
y th
e de
man
ds o
f the
com
mun
ity a
nd th
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent o
f th
e co
mm
une
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
This
pro
ject
will
ena
ble
the
inst
itutio
naliz
atio
n of
a P
rofe
ssio
nal D
evel
opm
ent U
nit.
For r
ealiz
atio
n of
this
pro
ject
, the
follo
win
g st
eps w
ill b
e fo
llow
ed:
1. W
ith th
e ap
prov
al o
f the
seco
ndar
y sc
hool
, roo
ms w
ill b
e us
ed to
hol
d va
rious
cou
rses
with
out i
nter
ferin
g w
ith th
e da
y to
day
teac
hing
in th
e sc
hool
2. T
he H
ead
of C
omm
une
will
ass
ign
a gr
oup
from
the
adm
inis
tratio
n to
con
stitu
te th
e Pr
ofes
sion
al D
evel
opm
ent U
nit,
whi
ch w
ill o
pera
te p
art t
ime
and
iden
tify
nec-
essa
ry c
ours
es fo
r the
com
mun
ity a
nd, i
n co
oper
atio
n w
ith th
e au
thor
ities
and
oth
er in
stitu
tions
, fac
ilita
te p
roce
dure
s for
the
proc
urem
ent o
f cou
rse
lect
urer
s3.
The
num
ber o
f par
ticip
ants
in th
ese
cour
ses w
ill b
e de
cide
d up
on in
con
sulta
tion
with
the
sele
cted
lect
urer
s4.
The
subj
ect c
ours
e gr
aphi
cs w
ill b
e pu
blis
hed
prom
inen
tly in
eve
ry v
illag
e, in
the
com
mun
e bu
ildin
g an
d in
the
seco
ndar
y sc
hool
bui
ldin
g5.
The
Pro
fess
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t Uni
t will
arc
hive
the
utili
zed
mat
eria
ls a
nd p
repa
re a
shor
t rep
ort
6. T
he c
ours
e gr
aphi
cs w
ill b
e pe
riodi
cally
upd
ated
and
subm
itted
for a
ppro
val b
y th
e H
ead
of C
omm
une
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees a
nd a
dvis
ers p
rofe
ssio
nally
trai
ned
Con
tem
pora
ry st
anda
rds i
n al
l fiel
ds o
f adm
inis
tratio
n at
tain
edIn
crea
sed
com
mun
ity sa
tisfa
ctio
n w
ith st
anda
rd o
f ser
vice
s offe
red
by th
e co
mm
une
Com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
Com
mun
ity
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees
AA
C, D
istri
ct, S
NV,
etc
.
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial l
ocal
and
fore
ign
dono
rsC
entra
l aut
horit
y in
stitu
tions
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Res
earc
h in
to n
eeds
and
opp
ortu
nitie
sA
ppro
val o
f ade
quat
e fu
nds
Des
ign
of tr
aini
ng d
evel
opm
ent g
raph
ic
Lack
of o
ppor
tuni
ties f
or c
arry
ing
out t
rain
ing
Neg
ligen
ce o
f loc
al a
dmin
istra
tion
empl
oyee
s
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
Per-d
iem
s, ac
com
mod
atio
n an
d tra
nspo
rt (
) lek
ëFo
r tra
inin
g pa
rtici
patio
n (
) lek
ëto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
010
Afte
r eac
h tr
aini
ng
46
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e G
1.o
2.P1
.Pr1
5o
bjec
tive:
Est
ablis
hmen
t of l
itera
ry a
nd sc
ient
ific
libra
ry fo
r th
e se
cond
ary
scho
olim
prov
emen
t of t
he te
achi
ng p
roce
ss a
nd d
evel
opm
ent o
f the
ca
paci
ties o
f em
ploy
ees w
orki
ng in
the
mos
t im
port
ant e
cono
mic
en
terp
rise
ssh
ort p
roje
ct d
escr
iptio
n:Th
e re
aliz
atio
n of
this
pro
ject
will
pro
vide
a re
sour
ce fo
r inc
reas
ing
the
know
ledg
e of
stud
ents
and
loca
l adu
lts w
ho w
ant t
o de
velo
p an
d im
prov
e th
eir c
ultu
ral o
r pr
ofes
sion
al le
vel.
The
libra
ry w
ill fa
cilit
ate
the
prov
isio
n of
kno
wle
dge
and
new
s for
thos
e in
tere
sted
. The
libr
ary
will
be
arra
nged
into
two
sect
ions
, one
for a
rts a
nd
hum
aniti
es a
nd th
e ot
her f
or sc
ient
ific
liter
atur
e. L
ibra
ry st
aff w
ill b
e tra
ined
in h
ow to
obt
ain
the
late
st n
ews a
nd re
leva
nt m
ater
ials
.1.
Pro
visi
on o
f ade
quat
e en
viro
nmen
t; 2.
Fur
nish
ing
of e
nviro
nmen
t with
nec
essa
ry e
quip
men
t; 3.
Set
ting
up o
f a w
orki
ng g
roup
to id
entif
y po
ssib
ilitie
s and
nee
ds o
f th
e lib
rary
; 4. I
dent
ifica
tion
of li
st o
f boo
ks to
be
prov
ided
by
inst
itutio
ns fr
ee o
f cha
rge;
5. A
rran
gem
ent o
f col
labo
ratio
n ag
reem
ent w
ith th
e lib
rary
in P
eshk
opi
6. P
repa
ratio
n of
regu
latio
n on
libr
ary
oper
atio
n, in
clud
ing
man
agem
ent m
etho
ds; 7
. Pre
para
tion
of e
xpen
se e
stim
ates
and
app
licat
ion
for p
rovi
sion
of n
eces
sary
fu
nds;
8. M
anag
emen
t of e
xpen
ses i
n ac
cord
ance
with
lega
l pro
cedu
res;
9. I
naug
urat
ion
and
prom
otio
n of
libr
ary
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Scho
ol c
hild
ren
will
hav
e op
portu
nity
to e
xplo
it lib
rary
reso
urce
sA
dults
will
hav
e op
portu
nity
to e
xplo
it lib
rary
reso
urce
sO
ppor
tuni
ty to
spen
d fr
ee ti
me
in a
cul
ture
d en
viro
nmen
tK
now
ledg
e of
libr
ary
user
s inc
reas
ed
Com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
Com
mun
ityIn
stitu
tions
rela
ted
to th
e co
mm
une
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e an
d se
cond
ary
scho
ol le
ader
sD
onor
sC
entra
l and
loca
l aut
horit
y in
stitu
tions
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial d
onor
sC
entra
l and
loca
l aut
horit
y in
stitu
tions
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Res
earc
h of
nee
ds a
nd p
ossi
bilit
ies
App
rova
l of a
dequ
ate
fund
sId
entifi
catio
n of
list
of b
ooks
to b
e pr
ovid
ed b
y in
stitu
tions
free
of c
harg
ePr
epar
atio
n of
regu
latio
n of
libr
ary
oper
atio
ns a
nd m
anag
emen
t met
hods
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
to im
plem
ent t
he p
roje
ctN
eglig
ence
of l
ocal
adm
inis
tratio
n an
d sc
hool
em
ploy
ees
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
For a
dapt
atio
n an
d co
mpl
etio
n of
the
envi
ronm
ent
(
) lek
ëFo
r ini
tial s
tock
of b
ooks
(
)
lekë
tota
L:
impl
emen
tatio
n pe
riod
:o
utco
me
peri
od:
dur
ing
2008
–200
9a
fter
200
9
47
Proj
ect t
itle:
c
ode:
G1.
o3.
P1.P
r23
obj
ectiv
e:Pr
ovis
ion
of a
mbu
lanc
e fo
r h
ealth
cen
tre
Prov
isio
n of
a n
orm
al p
rim
ary
heal
th se
rvic
e fo
r al
l com
mun
e re
side
nts
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
Thro
ugh
this
pro
ject
an
ambu
lanc
e w
ill b
e pr
ovid
ed fo
r the
com
mun
ity, h
elpi
ng to
solv
e th
e pr
oble
m o
f lin
king
the
prim
ary
heal
th c
entre
to a
hos
pita
l and
impr
ovin
g th
e fir
st-a
id se
rvic
e in
the
even
t of i
nsuf
ficie
nt c
apab
ility
of t
he h
ealth
cen
tre.
For r
ealiz
atio
n of
this
pro
ject
, the
follo
win
g st
eps w
ill b
e fo
llow
ed:
1. M
arke
t res
earc
h, in
ord
er to
est
imat
e th
e fu
nds r
equi
red
for p
urch
ase
of a
n am
bula
nce
with
pre
dete
rmin
ed p
aram
eter
s2.
Ana
lysi
s of fi
nanc
ial c
apac
ities
and
pro
visi
on o
f ade
quat
e fu
nds f
or p
urch
ase
of th
e am
bula
nce,
sala
ry fo
r the
driv
er(s
), fu
el a
nd se
rvic
ing
3. C
arry
ing
out o
f pro
cure
men
t pro
cedu
res f
or p
urch
ase
of th
e am
bula
nce
4. S
elec
tion
and
assi
gnm
ent o
f driv
er(s
)5.
Inst
alla
tion
of e
quip
men
t in
desi
gnat
ed p
lace
s6.
Des
ign
of g
raph
ic fo
r am
bula
nce
oper
atio
nO
ppor
tuni
ties f
or c
oope
ratio
n w
ith n
earb
y co
mm
unes
will
be
cons
ider
ed, i
nclu
ding
the
size
of c
ontri
butio
ns a
nd se
rvic
e pr
ovis
ion.
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Leve
l of fi
rst-a
id se
rvic
e im
prov
edC
omm
une
satis
fact
ion
leve
l inc
reas
edM
ore
effe
ctiv
e co
oper
atio
n w
ith o
ther
hea
lth se
rvic
e in
stitu
tions
ach
ieve
d
Com
mun
ityC
hron
ical
ly il
l pat
ient
sH
ealth
serv
ice
staf
fC
omm
une
auth
oriti
esPo
tent
ial a
ctor
s:Po
tent
ial c
ontr
ibut
ions
in th
e pr
ojec
t:C
omm
une
auth
oriti
esC
entra
l hea
lth in
stitu
tions
Hea
lth se
rvic
e st
aff
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial d
onor
sC
entra
l hea
lth in
stitu
tions
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Mar
ket r
esea
rch
for a
mbu
lanc
e w
ith re
quire
d pa
ram
eter
sA
ppro
val o
f ade
quat
e fu
nds
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
to im
plem
ent t
he p
roje
ctN
eglig
ence
by
loca
l adm
inis
tratio
n an
d he
alth
cen
tre e
mpl
oyee
se
stim
ated
exp
endi
ture
s:Fo
r pur
chas
e of
an
ambu
lanc
e (
) lek
ëFo
r rem
uner
atio
n, fu
el, s
ervi
cing
(for
one
yea
r)
(
) l
ekë
tota
lim
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:d
urin
g ye
ar 2
008
end
of y
ear
2008
48
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e: G
1.o
3.P1
.Pr2
4o
bjec
tive:
Prov
isio
n of
ref
rige
rato
rs fo
r sa
fegu
ardi
ng v
acci
nes i
n cl
inic
s Pr
ovis
ion
of a
nor
mal
pri
mar
y he
alth
serv
ice
for
all c
omm
une
resi
dent
ssh
ort p
roje
ct d
escr
iptio
n:Th
is p
roje
ct c
onsi
sts i
n th
e pr
ovis
ion
of v
acci
ne re
frig
erat
ors i
n th
e m
ain
heal
th c
entre
and
the
clin
ic in
eac
h vi
llage
.Fo
r rea
lizat
ion
of th
is p
roje
ct, t
he fo
llow
ing
step
s will
be
follo
wed
:1.
Mar
ket r
esea
rch
for e
stim
atio
n of
fund
s req
uire
d fo
r pur
chas
e of
the
refr
iger
ator
s with
pre
dete
rmin
ed p
aram
eter
s2.
Ana
lysi
s of fi
nanc
ial c
apac
ities
and
pro
visi
on o
f ade
quat
e fu
nd fo
r pur
chas
e of
refr
iger
ator
s3.
Car
ryin
g ou
t of p
rocu
rem
ent p
roce
dure
s for
pur
chas
e of
the
refr
iger
ator
s4.
Inst
alla
tion
of re
frig
erat
ors i
n pr
e-de
term
ined
pla
ces
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Vacc
ine
shel
f life
safe
guar
ded
Com
mun
ity sa
tisfa
ctio
n le
vel i
ncre
ased
Tim
e sc
hedu
le fo
r vac
cina
tions
Com
mun
ityH
ealth
serv
ice
staf
fC
omm
une
auth
oriti
esPo
tent
ial a
ctor
s:Po
tent
ial c
ontr
ibut
ions
in th
e pr
ojec
t:C
omm
une
auth
oriti
esC
entra
l hea
lth in
stitu
tions
Hea
lth c
entre
staf
f
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial d
onor
sC
entra
l hea
lth in
stitu
tions
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Mar
ket r
esea
rch
on re
frig
erat
ors w
ith p
aram
eter
s tha
t mee
t act
ual n
eeds
App
rova
l of a
dequ
ate
fund
sIn
suffi
cien
t fun
ds to
impl
emen
t the
pro
ject
Neg
ligen
ce o
f loc
al a
dmin
istra
tion
and
heal
th c
entre
em
ploy
ees
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
Purc
hase
of 1
0 re
frig
erat
ors
(
) l
ekë
Tran
spor
t, in
stal
latio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
expe
nses
(
) lek
ëto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:d
urin
g ye
ar 2
008
end
of y
ear
2008
49
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e: G
1.o
3.P2
.Pr2
5o
bjec
tive:
trai
ning
of m
edic
al st
aff
Prov
isio
n of
a n
orm
al p
rim
ary
heal
th se
rvic
e fo
r al
l com
mun
e re
side
nts
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
Thro
ugh
this
pro
ject
trai
ning
of m
edic
al st
aff i
n th
e pr
imar
y he
alth
serv
ice
will
be
carr
ied
out,
in o
rder
to m
eet c
onte
mpo
rary
nee
ds.
For r
ealiz
atio
n of
this
pro
ject
, the
follo
win
g st
eps w
ill b
e fo
llow
ed:
1. Id
entifi
catio
n of
trai
ning
nee
ds in
coo
pera
tion
with
hea
lth se
rvic
e in
stitu
tions
2. Id
entifi
catio
n of
cap
aciti
es in
hea
lth se
rvic
e in
stitu
tions
to p
rovi
de tr
aini
ng a
ccor
ding
to id
entifi
ed th
emes
3. A
naly
sis o
f fina
ncia
l cap
aciti
es fo
r pro
visi
on o
f nec
essa
ry tr
aini
ng th
at c
anno
t be
prov
ided
by
the
partn
er in
stitu
tions
4. D
esig
n of
a tr
aini
ng g
raph
ic a
ccor
ding
to th
eme
and
plan
par
ticip
atio
n5.
Car
ryin
g ou
t of t
rain
ing
and
arch
ivin
g of
trai
ning
mat
eria
ls, i
nclu
ding
repo
rt an
d su
bseq
uent
pro
posa
lsTh
e pe
rspe
ctiv
e of
pot
entia
l dev
elop
men
ts in
the
com
mun
e w
ill b
e ta
ken
into
con
side
ratio
n du
ring
the
rese
arch
of n
eeds
, in
orde
r to
pre-
empt
shor
t-ter
m n
eeds
.o
utco
mes
:B
enefi
ciar
y:Le
vel o
f prim
ary
heal
th se
rvic
e em
ploy
ee sk
ills i
ncre
ased
Con
tem
pora
ry st
anda
rds o
f hea
lth se
rvic
e re
ache
dC
omm
unity
satis
fact
ion
leve
l reg
ardi
ng se
rvic
es o
ffere
d to
com
mun
e in
crea
sed
Com
mun
e pr
imar
y he
alth
serv
ice
staf
fC
omm
unity
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e he
alth
cen
tre e
xecu
tives
Hea
lth se
rvic
e in
stitu
tions
Hea
lth se
rvic
e in
stitu
tions
Com
mun
e he
alth
cen
tre e
xecu
tives
Spec
ialis
t don
ors
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Res
earc
h in
to n
eeds
and
cap
aciti
esA
ppro
val o
f ade
quat
e fu
nds
Des
ign
of tr
aini
ng g
raph
ic
Lack
of o
ppor
tuni
ties f
or c
arry
ing
out t
rain
ing
Neg
ligen
ce o
f loc
al a
dmin
istra
tion
empl
oyee
s
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
Per d
iem
s, ac
com
mod
atio
n an
d tra
nspo
rt
(
) lek
ëFo
r tra
inin
g pa
rtici
patio
n
(
) le
këto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
010
aft
er e
ach
trai
ning
50
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e: G
2.o
1.P2
.Pr2
9o
bjec
tive:
des
ign
and
sett
ing
up o
f cab
le p
hone
con
nect
ion
with
nat
iona
l net
wor
k, a
nd fu
nc-
tioni
ng o
f the
pos
tal s
ervi
ceo
rgan
izat
ion
of tr
ansp
ort s
ervi
ce fo
r pe
ople
and
goo
ds, a
nd m
akin
g av
aila
ble
com
mun
icat
ions
and
info
rmat
ion
serv
ices
to sa
tisfy
the
deve
lopi
ng d
eman
ds o
f the
com
mun
itysh
ort p
roje
ct d
escr
iptio
n:Th
roug
h th
is p
roje
ct it
will
be
poss
ible
to c
onne
ct th
e co
mm
une
with
the
natio
nal l
andl
ine
tele
phon
e ne
twor
k. T
he p
roje
ct w
ill b
e di
vide
d in
to p
hase
s whe
re, b
esid
es
a ca
ble
conn
ectio
n w
ith th
e na
tiona
l net
wor
k, a
switc
hboa
rd w
ill b
e es
tabl
ishe
d w
ith a
dequ
ate
capa
citie
s for
all
cust
omer
s in
each
vill
age,
alo
ng w
ith a
n ap
prop
riate
ne
twor
k, a
nd th
e fu
nctio
ning
of t
he p
osta
l ser
vice
in c
olla
bora
tion
with
the
mai
n di
rect
orat
e. M
ore
spec
ifica
lly th
e fo
llow
ing
will
be
unde
rtake
n:Pr
ojec
t stu
dy p
hase
: 1. D
esig
n an
d es
timat
e of
wor
ks in
clud
ing
layi
ng o
f a c
able
, con
stru
ctio
n of
cen
tral b
uild
ing,
del
iver
y of
net
wor
k an
d po
st o
ffice
; 2. S
tudy
, de
sign
and
pre
para
tion
of e
stim
ate
for e
quip
men
t of t
he sw
itchb
oard
, pho
ne n
etw
ork
and
post
offi
ce; 3
. Pro
ject
stud
y an
d es
timat
es a
nd c
oope
ratio
n w
ith p
oten
tial
partn
ers t
o es
tabl
ish
impl
emen
tatio
n ph
ases
and
con
tribu
tions
of t
he p
roje
ct p
artic
ipan
tsB
uild
ing
phas
e: 1
. Car
ryin
g ou
t of p
rocu
rem
ent p
roce
dure
s for
bui
ldin
g an
d in
stal
latio
n; 2
. Car
ryin
g ou
t of p
roje
ct a
ppro
ved
by th
e co
mpe
tent
aut
horit
ies
Ope
ratio
n ph
ase:
Put
ting
the
phon
e ne
twor
k an
d po
stal
serv
ice
into
ope
ratio
n, a
ccor
ding
to a
pre
arra
nged
agr
eem
ent w
ith p
roje
cts p
artic
ipan
ts.
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Land
line
serv
ice
prov
ided
and
ava
ilabl
e fo
r com
mun
e’s c
lient
sG
ood
com
mun
icat
ion
crea
ted
betw
een
inst
itutio
nsVa
rious
serv
ices
ava
ilabl
e fo
r the
com
mun
ity th
roug
h po
st o
ffice
Inte
rnet
acc
ess p
rovi
ded
base
d on
act
ual n
eeds
Com
mun
ityEd
ucat
iona
l Dire
ctor
ate
and
scho
ol b
oard
Com
mun
e
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Gen
eral
Pos
t Offi
ce D
irect
orat
eM
inis
try o
f Pub
lic W
orks
, Tra
nspo
rt an
d Te
leco
mm
unic
atio
ns
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial l
ocal
and
fore
ign
dono
rsC
entra
l aut
horit
y in
stitu
tions
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Prep
arat
ion
of p
roje
cts,
estim
ates
and
rese
arch
App
rova
l of a
dequ
ate
fund
s bas
ed o
n ag
reem
ent w
ith p
roje
ct p
artn
ers
Prov
isio
n of
resp
ectiv
e au
thor
izat
ions
con
cern
ing
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
pro
vide
dLa
ck o
f agr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n th
e m
ain
acto
rsW
eak
man
agem
ent a
nd c
oord
inat
ion
amon
g pr
ojec
t par
ticip
ants
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
For p
roje
ct st
udy
phas
e
(
)
lekë
For b
uild
ing
phas
e
(
)
lekë
For o
pera
tions
pha
se (f
or o
ne y
ear)
(
) le
këto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
010
2010
51
Proj
ect t
itle
c
ode:
G2.
o2.
P1.P
r__
obj
ectiv
e:B
uild
ing
of th
e ro
ad _
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
ach
ieve
men
t of n
orm
al st
anda
rds o
f roa
d in
fras
truc
ture
in th
e co
mm
une
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
This
pro
ject
will
des
ign
and
build
a ro
ad li
nkin
g __
____
____
with
___
____
___.
Thi
s roa
d is
con
side
red
to b
e es
sent
ial b
ecau
se _
____
____
_.Th
e ro
ad h
as th
e fo
llow
ing
appr
oxim
ate
char
acte
ristic
s:Le
ngth
__
km; b
read
th _
_ m
; can
als _
__ m
; cro
ss d
itche
s __
m; b
ridge
__
(__
m in
leng
th);
dam
s __
m.
The
road
foun
datio
n w
ill c
onsi
st o
f ___
__ (_
_%) a
nd _
_ (_
_%).
App
roxi
mat
ely
___
m3 o
f sto
ne w
ill b
e la
id.
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Rap
id a
nd re
liabl
e co
mm
unic
atio
n w
ith c
omm
une
cent
reEc
onom
ic a
ctiv
ities
enc
oura
ged
and
faci
litat
edSe
rvic
es o
ffere
d in
cen
tre o
f com
mun
e br
oadl
y ex
pand
edTr
ansp
ort f
or sc
hool
chi
ldre
n fa
ster
and
less
exp
ensi
ve
Vill
age
com
mun
ities
Bus
ines
s com
mun
ityC
omm
une
adm
inis
tratio
n
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Dib
ra d
istri
ctG
ener
al R
oads
Dire
ctor
ate
Min
istry
of P
ublic
Wor
ks, T
rans
port
and
Tele
com
mun
icat
ion
Com
mun
eD
ibra
dis
trict
Loca
l and
fore
ign
dono
rsC
entra
l aut
horit
y in
stitu
tions
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Prep
arat
ion
of p
roje
cts,
estim
ates
and
rese
arch
App
rova
l of a
dequ
ate
fund
s bas
ed o
n ag
reem
ent w
ith p
roje
ct p
artn
ers
Prov
isio
n of
resp
ectiv
e au
thor
izat
ions
con
cern
ing
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
pro
vide
dLa
ck o
f agr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n co
oper
atin
g in
stitu
tions
Wea
k m
anag
emen
t and
coo
rdin
atio
n am
ong
proj
ect p
artic
ipan
tse
stim
ated
exp
endi
ture
s:Fo
r pro
ject
stud
y ph
ase
(
) le
këFo
r bui
ldin
g ph
ase
(
)
lekë
tota
L:
impl
emen
tatio
n pe
riod
:o
utco
me
peri
od:
2008
–201
020
10
52
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Proj
ect t
itle
c
ode:
G2.
o2.
P1.P
r__
obj
ectiv
e:R
econ
stru
ctio
n an
d as
phal
ting
of th
e ro
ad _
____
____
____
____
____
____
__a
chie
vem
ent o
f nor
mal
stan
dard
s of r
oad
infr
astr
uctu
re in
the
com
mun
esh
ort p
roje
ct d
escr
iptio
n:Th
is p
roje
ct w
ill d
esig
n an
d bu
ild a
road
link
ing
____
____
__ w
ith _
____
____
_. T
his r
oad
is c
onsi
dere
d to
be
esse
ntia
l bec
ause
___
____
___.
The
road
has
the
follo
win
g ap
prox
imat
e ch
arac
teris
tics:
Leng
th _
_ km
; bre
adth
__
m; c
anal
s ___
m; c
ross
ditc
hes _
_ m
; brid
ge _
_ (_
_ m
in le
ngth
); da
ms _
_ m
.Th
e ro
ad fo
unda
tion
will
con
sist
of _
____
(__%
) and
__
(__%
). A
ppro
xim
atel
y __
_ m
3 of s
tone
will
be
laid
.Th
e st
eps t
hat w
ill b
e fo
llow
ed in
clud
e:1.
Pre
para
tion
of p
roje
ct a
nd e
stim
ate
for t
he re
cons
truct
ion
of th
e ro
ad a
nd a
spha
lting
2. P
rovi
sion
of a
dequ
ate
fund
s3.
App
rova
l of t
he p
roje
ct b
y th
e co
mpe
tent
aut
horit
ies
4. C
arry
ing
out o
f pro
cure
men
t pro
cedu
res f
or th
e re
cons
truct
ion,
as w
ell a
s for
the
asph
altin
go
utco
mes
:B
enefi
ciar
y:R
apid
and
relia
ble
com
mun
icat
ion
with
com
mun
e ce
ntre
Econ
omic
act
iviti
es e
ncou
rage
d an
d fa
cilit
ated
Serv
ices
offe
red
in c
entre
of c
omm
une
broa
dly
expa
nded
Tran
spor
t for
scho
ol c
hild
ren
fast
er a
nd le
ss e
xpen
sive
Vill
age
com
mun
ities
Bus
ines
s com
mun
ityC
omm
une
adm
inis
tratio
n
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Dib
ra d
istri
ctG
ener
al R
oads
Dire
ctor
ate
Min
istry
of P
ublic
Wor
ks, T
rans
port
and
Tele
com
mun
icat
ions
Com
mun
eD
ibra
dis
trict
Loca
l and
fore
ign
dono
rsC
entra
l aut
horit
y in
stitu
tions
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Prep
arat
ion
of p
roje
cts,
estim
ates
and
rese
arch
App
rova
l of a
dequ
ate
fund
s bas
ed o
n ag
reem
ent w
ith p
roje
ct p
artn
ers
Prov
isio
n of
resp
ectiv
e au
thor
izat
ions
con
cern
ing
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
pro
vide
dLa
ck o
f agr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n co
oper
atin
g in
stitu
tions
Wea
k m
anag
emen
t and
coo
rdin
atio
n am
ong
proj
ect p
artic
ipan
tse
stim
ated
exp
endi
ture
s:Fo
r pro
ject
stud
y ph
ase
(
) l
ekë
For b
uild
ing
phas
e
(
) le
këto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
010
2010
53
Proj
ect t
itle:
c
ode:
G2.
o3.
P2.P
r36
obj
ectiv
e:c
ompl
etio
n of
con
stru
ctio
n of
wat
er su
pply
syst
em in
sop
onik
aa
chie
vem
ent o
f nor
mal
stan
dard
s of w
ater
and
ele
ctri
city
supp
ly
syst
ems
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
This
pro
ject
com
pris
es th
e de
sign
and
con
stru
ctio
n of
a w
ater
supp
ly sy
stem
in S
opon
ika
villa
ge. I
t will
supp
ly th
e vi
llage
s of _
___,
___
__, _
___
and
____
_ w
ith
drin
king
wat
er. T
he sp
ring
of _
____
__ w
ill b
e ex
ploi
ted,
and
is e
stim
ated
to h
ave
an a
vera
ge fl
ow o
f __m
3 /sec
. The
wat
er su
pply
syst
em w
ill fu
nctio
n th
roug
h gr
avity
. Th
ere
will
be
a de
posi
t with
a c
apac
ity o
f ___
m3 .
For t
he c
onst
ruct
ion
of th
is w
ater
-sup
ply
syst
em th
e fo
llow
ing
step
s will
be
follo
wed
:1.
Res
earc
h in
to p
ossi
bilit
ies a
nd c
apac
ities
of t
he c
olle
ctio
n an
d de
liver
y ne
twor
k2.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
a fu
ll te
chni
cal p
roje
ct a
nd p
repa
ratio
n of
est
imat
es fo
r con
stru
ctio
n, a
nd in
stal
latio
n of
nec
essa
ry m
achi
nery
and
equ
ipm
ent
3. R
esea
rch
into
opp
ortu
nitie
s of fi
nanc
ing
for t
his p
roje
ct so
ught
with
oth
er p
oten
tial a
ctor
s, su
ch a
s cen
tral a
utho
rity
inst
itutio
ns, t
he D
istri
ct o
r var
ious
don
ors
4. S
igni
ng o
f agr
eem
ent b
etw
een
com
mun
e au
thor
ities
and
oth
er p
artic
ipan
ts id
entifi
ed a
s pro
ject
par
ticip
ants
5. A
ppro
val o
f res
pect
ive
auth
oriz
atio
ns fo
r con
stru
ctio
n of
wor
k6.
Per
form
ing
of le
gal p
rocu
rem
ent p
roce
dure
s for
pro
ject
impl
emen
tatio
n7.
Defi
nitio
n of
form
and
org
aniz
atio
nal s
truct
ures
for m
anag
emen
t of t
he w
ork
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Com
mun
ity o
f ___
_ re
side
nts s
uppl
ied
with
wat
erEx
istin
g an
d pe
rspe
ctiv
e ec
onom
ic a
ctiv
ities
faci
litat
edSa
tisfa
ctio
n an
d tru
st o
f res
iden
ts in
gov
erni
ng o
rgan
s inc
reas
ed
Vill
age
com
mun
ities
Bus
ines
s com
mun
ityC
omm
une
adm
inis
tratio
nPo
tent
ial a
ctor
s:Po
tent
ial c
ontr
ibut
ions
in th
e pr
ojec
t:C
omm
une
auth
oriti
esD
ibra
dis
trict
Gen
eral
Roa
ds’ D
irect
orat
eM
inis
try o
f Pub
lic W
orks
, Tra
nspo
rt an
d Te
leco
mm
unic
atio
ns
Com
mun
eD
ibra
dis
trict
Pote
ntia
l loc
al a
nd fo
reig
n do
nors
Cen
tral a
utho
rity
inst
itutio
nsPr
elim
inar
y co
nditi
ons:
Ris
k fa
ctor
s:Pr
epar
atio
n of
pro
ject
s, es
timat
es a
nd re
sear
chA
ppro
val o
f ade
quat
e fu
nds b
ased
on
agre
emen
t rea
ched
with
pro
ject
par
tner
sPr
ovis
ion
of re
spec
tive
auth
oriz
atio
ns c
once
rnin
g pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
pro
vide
dLa
ck o
f agr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n co
oper
atin
g in
stitu
tions
Wea
k m
anag
emen
t and
coo
rdin
atio
n of
pro
ject
par
ticip
ants
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
For p
roje
ct st
udy
phas
e (
)
lekë
For b
uild
ing
phas
e (
)
lekë
tota
L:
impl
emen
tatio
n pe
riod
:o
utco
me
peri
od:
2008
–201
020
10
54
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Proj
ect t
itle
c
ode:
G3.
o1.
P3.P
r40
obj
ectiv
e:c
onst
ruct
ion
of ir
riga
tion
syst
em fo
r Fu
sh a
liePr
ovis
ion
of o
ptim
al p
hysi
cal i
nfra
stru
ctur
e an
d im
prov
emen
t of f
arm
-er
s’ kn
owle
dge
in th
e au
gmen
tatio
n of
agr
icul
tura
l pro
duct
s, ex
ploi
ting
max
imal
ly th
e co
mm
une’
s tra
ditio
n an
d po
tent
ial
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
Thro
ugh
this
pro
ject
irrig
atio
n of
the
agric
ultu
ral l
and
arou
nd F
ushë
Çid
hën
villa
ge n
ot c
urre
ntly
irrig
ated
will
be
poss
ible
, inc
reas
ing
prod
uctiv
ity. T
he w
ater
will
be
col
lect
ed fr
om _
____
____
____
__. T
he le
ngth
of t
he m
ain
ditc
hes i
s app
roxi
mat
ely
____
km
. The
are
a to
be
wat
ered
by
this
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
is e
xpec
ted
to b
e ap
prox
imat
ely
____
ha.
For
real
izat
ion
of th
is p
roje
ct, t
he fo
llow
ing
step
s will
be
follo
wed
:1.
Res
earc
h in
to p
ossi
bilit
ies a
nd n
eeds
of p
lann
ed a
reas
to b
e w
ater
ed2.
Stu
dy in
to fi
nanc
ing
oppo
rtuni
ties f
or p
roje
ct3.
Pre
para
tion
of te
chni
cal p
roje
ct fo
r app
rova
l by
com
pete
nt o
rgan
s4.
For
mal
izat
ion
of p
ossi
ble
agre
emen
ts w
ith p
roje
ct p
artic
ipan
ts5.
App
rova
l for
pro
ject
impl
emen
tatio
n6.
Per
form
ing
of le
gal p
rocu
rem
ent p
roce
dure
s for
pro
ject
impl
emen
tatio
n7.
For
mal
izat
ion
of m
anag
emen
t and
mai
nten
ance
of t
he ir
rigat
ion
syst
emo
utco
mes
:B
enefi
ciar
y:Ir
rigat
ion
of la
nd c
urre
ntly
not
wat
ered
Prod
uctiv
ity o
f agr
icul
tura
l lan
d in
crea
sed
Econ
omic
leve
l of f
arm
ers b
enefi
ting
from
pro
ject
incr
ease
dTr
ust a
nd sa
tisfa
ctio
n le
vel o
f com
mun
ity, a
s wel
l as e
cono
mic
leve
l, in
crea
sed
Vill
age
com
mun
ityB
usin
ess c
omm
unity
Com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Dib
ra d
istri
ctPo
tent
ial i
nves
tors
Reg
iona
l Agr
icul
ture
Dire
ctor
ate
Min
istry
of A
gric
ultu
re a
nd F
ood
Com
mun
eD
ibra
dis
trict
Pote
ntia
l loc
al a
nd fo
reig
n do
nors
Cen
tral a
utho
rity
inst
itutio
ns
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Prep
arat
ion
of p
roje
cts,
estim
ates
and
rese
arch
App
rova
l of a
dequ
ate
fund
s bas
ed o
n ag
reem
ent w
ith p
roje
ct p
artn
ers
Prov
isio
n of
resp
ectiv
e au
thor
izat
ions
con
cern
ing
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
pro
vide
dLa
ck o
f agr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n co
oper
atin
g in
stitu
tions
Poor
man
agem
ent b
y pr
ojec
t par
ticip
ants
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
For p
roje
ct st
udy
phas
e
(
)
lekë
For b
uild
ing
phas
e
(
) lek
ëto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
010
2010
55
Proj
ect t
itle
c
ode:
G3.
o3.
P1.P
r48
obj
ectiv
e:c
onst
ruct
ion
of d
airi
es in
Blli
ce a
nd F
ush
alie
vill
ages
incr
ease
in n
umbe
r an
d le
vel o
f org
aniz
atio
n of
pro
duct
ion
and
proc
ess-
ing
busi
ness
es, a
nd st
imul
atio
n fo
r ne
w p
rodu
cts i
n a
clim
ate
of c
oope
ra-
tion
with
trad
ing
busi
ness
es a
nd c
omm
une
auth
oriti
essh
ort p
roje
ct d
escr
iptio
n:Th
is p
roje
ct c
onsi
sts i
n th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f a u
nit f
or p
roce
ssin
g of
farm
ing
prod
uce
in th
e vi
llage
s of B
llice
and
Fus
h A
lie. T
here
are
cur
rent
ly th
ree
alte
rnat
ives
: th
e un
it co
uld
be p
rivat
e pr
oper
ty a
nd p
rivat
ely
run;
pro
perty
of t
he c
omm
une
and
man
aged
by
it; o
r pro
perty
of t
he c
omm
une
and
man
aged
priv
atel
y. Ir
resp
ectiv
e of
the
impl
emen
tatio
n, th
e ne
ed fo
r pre
para
tion
of a
bui
ldin
g an
d te
chno
logi
cal p
roje
ct th
at m
eets
the
regi
onal
farm
ing
requ
irem
ents
is in
disp
utab
le. T
he p
roje
ct
is p
lann
ed to
be
divi
ded
into
var
ious
pha
ses a
s fol
low
s: S
tudy
and
des
ign
phas
e: i)
Est
ablis
h a
wor
king
gro
up fo
r res
earc
hing
pot
entia
l alte
rnat
ives
rega
rdin
g th
e pr
oprie
tary
and
man
agem
ent f
orm
, bas
ed o
n th
e ca
lcul
ated
cap
acity
; ii)
Prep
are
tech
nica
l, bu
ildin
g an
d te
chno
logi
cal p
roje
ct a
s wel
l as t
he re
spec
tive
estim
ates
; iii)
R
esea
rch
finan
cing
opp
ortu
nitie
s acc
ordi
ng to
the
iden
tified
alte
rnat
ives
; iv)
Det
erm
ine
the
met
hod
and
form
of p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion.
Bui
ldin
g ph
ase:
i) A
p-pr
oval
of r
espe
ctiv
e au
thor
izat
ions
by
the
com
pete
nt a
utho
ritie
s; ii
) Car
ryin
g ou
t of p
rocu
rem
ent p
roce
dure
s for
mon
itorin
g th
e bu
ildin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e ap
prov
ed p
roje
ct b
y th
e co
mpe
tent
aut
horit
ies.
Ope
ratio
n ph
ase:
Mak
ing
proj
ect o
pera
tiona
l acc
ordi
ng to
the
agre
emen
t rea
ched
with
the
parti
cipa
nts.
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Cen
traliz
ed p
roce
ssin
g se
rvic
e of
farm
ing
prod
uce
prov
ided
Farm
ing
prod
uce
incr
ease
d as
resu
lt of
mar
ket p
rovi
sion
Col
labo
ratio
n be
twee
n fa
rmer
s enc
oura
ged
Opp
ortu
nitie
s for
gua
rant
eed
mar
ket i
ncre
ased
Farm
ing
com
mun
ityB
usin
ess c
omm
unity
Com
mun
e
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Farm
ing
farm
ers
Inte
rest
ed c
entra
l and
loca
l ins
titut
ions
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial l
ocal
and
fore
ign
dono
rsIn
tere
sted
priv
ate
farm
ers a
nd in
vest
ors
Cen
tral a
nd lo
cal a
utho
rity
inst
itutio
nsPr
elim
inar
y co
nditi
ons:
Ris
k fa
ctor
s:C
arry
ing
out r
esea
rch
into
alte
rnat
ives
, pro
ject
s and
est
imat
esPr
ovis
ion
of a
dequ
ate
fund
s bas
ed o
n ag
reem
ent w
ith p
roje
ct p
artn
ers
Prov
isio
n of
resp
ectiv
e au
thor
izat
ions
for p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
pro
vide
dLa
ck o
f agr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n m
ain
acto
rsW
eak
man
agem
ent a
nd c
oord
inat
ion
of p
roje
ct p
artic
ipan
tse
stim
ated
exp
endi
ture
s:Fo
r pro
ject
stud
y ph
ase
(
)
lekë
For b
uild
ing
phas
e
(
) l
ekë
For o
pera
tion
phas
e (f
or o
ne y
ear)
(
) le
këto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:D
urin
g 20
08–2
010
2011
56
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Proj
ect t
itle
cod
e: G
3.o
3.P2
.Pr5
3o
bjec
tive:
und
erta
king
of r
esea
rch
into
pot
entia
l of c
ultiv
atio
n an
d pr
oces
sing
of m
edic
i-na
l her
bsin
crea
se in
num
ber
and
leve
l of o
rgan
izat
ion
of p
rodu
ctio
n an
d pr
oces
s-in
g bu
sine
sses
, and
stim
ulat
ion
for
new
pro
duct
s in
a cl
imat
e of
coo
pera
-tio
n w
ith tr
adin
g bu
sine
sses
and
com
mun
e au
thor
ities
shor
t pro
ject
des
crip
tion:
This
pro
ject
will
stud
y th
e po
ssib
ility
of f
urth
erin
g th
e ex
ploi
tatio
n of
sage
by
the
loca
l com
mun
ity. T
here
is u
sual
ly sp
orad
ic c
olle
ctio
n an
d sa
le o
f thi
s her
b, b
ut
the
activ
ity c
ould
be
mor
e pr
oduc
tive,
and
opp
ortu
nitie
s for
gat
herin
g, c
ultiv
atio
n an
d pr
oces
sing
cou
ld b
e ar
rang
ed. T
he p
roje
ct w
ill st
udy
thes
e op
portu
nitie
s and
pr
epar
e gu
idel
ines
for t
he im
plem
enta
tion
and
met
hod
of d
evel
opm
ent o
f rel
ated
eco
nom
ic a
ctiv
ities
. It w
ould
act
as a
mod
el fo
r oth
er m
edic
inal
pla
nts t
hat h
ave
econ
omic
pot
entia
l. Fo
r rea
lizat
ion
of th
is p
roje
ct, t
he fo
llow
ing
step
s will
be
follo
wed
: 1. F
ind
poss
ible
fina
ncin
g fo
r thi
s stu
dy fo
r the
follo
win
g ac
tiviti
es: a
) Col
-le
ctio
n an
d an
alys
is o
f exi
stin
g st
atis
tical
, sci
entifi
c an
d m
arke
ting
data
, thr
ough
est
ablis
hing
a w
orki
ng g
roup
; b) P
repa
ratio
n of
a st
udy
base
d on
the
data
col
lect
ed,
incl
udin
g a
prac
tical
gui
de c
ompr
ehen
sibl
e to
farm
ers;
c) P
ublis
hing
, pro
mot
ion
and
deliv
ery
of b
ookl
ets t
o th
ose
inte
rest
ed; 2
. Ide
ntify
inte
rest
ed p
erso
ns a
nd p
lan
furth
er a
ctiv
ities
on
conc
rete
term
s tha
t pro
vide
con
tribu
tion
of a
ll ac
tors
; 3. A
ppro
val f
rom
com
mun
e co
unci
l of i
ncen
tives
and
faci
litat
ion
mea
sure
s for
the
deve
l-op
men
t of e
cono
mic
act
iviti
es in
the
field
of m
edic
inal
pla
nts.
out
com
es:
Ben
efici
ary:
Sage
col
lect
ion
incr
ease
dA
uthe
ntic
eco
nom
ic a
ctiv
ities
rela
ted
to sa
ge e
ncou
rage
dEc
onom
ic le
vel o
f far
mer
s im
prov
edTr
ust a
nd sa
tisfa
ctio
n of
com
mun
ity in
crea
sed
and
econ
omic
leve
l im
prov
ed
Vill
age
com
mun
ities
Bus
ines
s com
mun
ityC
omm
une
adm
inis
tratio
n
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
Dib
ra d
istri
ctPo
tent
ial i
nves
tors
Reg
iona
l Agr
icul
ture
Dire
ctor
ate
Min
istry
of A
gric
ultu
re a
nd F
ood
Com
mun
eD
ibra
dis
trict
Pote
ntia
l loc
al a
nd fo
reig
n do
nors
Cen
tral a
utho
rity
inst
itutio
ns
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Prov
isio
n of
ade
quat
e fu
nds f
or c
arry
ing
out a
ll co
mpo
nent
sPr
ocur
emen
t and
eng
agem
ent o
f spe
cial
ists
to p
erfo
rm st
udy
Prov
isio
n of
coo
pera
tion
with
inst
itutio
ns th
at m
ay h
elp
in p
roje
ct
Insu
ffici
ent f
unds
pro
vide
dLa
ck o
f agr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n co
oper
atin
g in
stitu
tions
Inad
equa
te c
omm
itmen
t of s
elec
ted
spec
ialis
tsN
eglig
ence
of c
omm
une
auth
oriti
ese
stim
ated
exp
endi
ture
s:Fo
r dat
a co
llect
ion
phas
e
(
)
lekë
For s
tudy
pha
se
(
) le
këFo
r pub
licat
ion
and
prom
otio
n ph
ase
(
) lek
ëto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
009
2009
57
Proj
ect t
itle
c
ode:
G3.
o1.
P1.P
r38,
47o
bjec
tive:
als
o 3.
1 an
d 3.
238
. est
ablis
hmen
t of a
gric
ultu
re F
arm
ers’
ass
ocia
tion
47. e
stab
lishm
ent o
f Liv
esto
ck F
arm
ers’
ass
ocia
tion
incr
ease
of c
hoic
e an
d st
abili
ty o
f pro
duct
ion,
pro
cess
ing
and
trad
ing
in
the
com
mun
e, e
xplo
iting
its n
atur
al p
oten
tial a
nd a
dvan
tage
s and
use
of
effe
ctiv
e m
odel
s of b
usin
ess c
oope
ratio
nsh
ort p
roje
ct d
escr
iptio
n:Th
is p
roje
ct w
ill e
nabl
e th
e in
stitu
tiona
lizat
ion
of c
oope
ratio
n be
twee
n fa
rmer
s with
com
mon
inte
rest
s.Fo
r rea
lizat
ion
of th
is p
roje
ct, t
he fo
llow
ing
step
s will
be
follo
wed
:1.
In c
olla
bora
tion
with
fiel
d sp
ecia
lists
, the
com
mun
e w
ill p
repa
re in
form
atio
n m
ater
ial r
egar
ding
the
adva
ntag
es fo
r far
mer
s’ as
soci
atio
ns o
r gro
ups w
ith c
omm
on
inte
rest
s, as
wel
l as t
heir
inst
itutio
naliz
atio
n in
ord
er to
be
an a
ctiv
e fa
ctor
in th
e ec
onom
ic a
nd so
cial
life
of t
he c
omm
une
and
beyo
nd.
2. D
eliv
ery
of in
form
atio
n an
d or
gani
zatio
n of
pub
lic m
eetin
gs w
ith in
tere
sted
par
ties t
o ex
plai
n m
etho
ds th
at th
e co
mm
une
will
pro
vide
for f
acili
tatin
g pe
riodi
c m
eetin
gs, e
tc.,
as w
ell a
s for
ass
urin
g th
em th
at a
uni
ted
voic
e w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
in th
e de
cisi
ons o
f the
loca
l aut
horit
ies.
3. A
ssis
tanc
e in
the
foun
datio
n an
d le
galiz
atio
n of
thes
e as
soci
atio
ns b
ased
on
free
will
and
com
mon
inte
rest
s, he
lpin
g th
em in
pre
parin
g a
stat
ute
and
a fu
nctio
nal
form
of o
rgan
izat
ion.
4. A
ppro
val i
n th
e co
mm
une
coun
cil o
f a fu
nd fo
r the
supp
ort o
f the
se a
ssoc
iatio
ns in
the
first
pha
ses o
f the
ir ac
tivity
, con
side
ring
them
as f
utur
e pa
rtner
s.o
utco
mes
:B
enefi
ciar
y:Le
vel o
f coo
pera
tion
amon
g fa
rmer
s inc
reas
edPr
emise
s on
incr
easin
g co
mm
unity
par
ticip
atio
n in
dec
ision
-mak
ing
proc
ess p
rovi
ded
Econ
omic
leve
l of r
elat
ed b
usin
esse
s inc
reas
edIn
disp
ensa
ble
partn
ers p
rovi
ded
for l
ocal
gov
erna
nce
Com
mun
e ad
min
istra
tion
Bus
ines
s com
mun
ity w
ith c
omm
on in
tere
sts
Pote
ntia
l act
ors:
Pote
ntia
l con
trib
utio
ns in
the
proj
ect:
Com
mun
e au
thor
ities
and
adm
inis
tratio
n em
ploy
ees
Farm
ers w
ith c
omm
on in
tere
sts
AA
C, d
istri
ct, S
NV,
etc
.
Com
mun
ePo
tent
ial l
ocal
and
fore
ign
dono
rsB
usin
ess c
omm
unity
Prel
imin
ary
cond
ition
s:R
isk
fact
ors:
Prep
arat
ion
of in
form
atio
n m
ater
ials
Sele
ctio
n of
relia
ble,
org
anis
atio
nally
skill
ed in
divi
dual
s for
ass
ista
nce
Com
mun
ity in
form
ed a
s wel
l as p
ossi
ble
Insu
ffici
ent o
ppor
tuni
ties f
or in
form
ing
farm
ers
Neg
ligen
ce o
f loc
al a
dmin
istra
tion
empl
oyee
s and
farm
ers
Lack
of t
rust
in o
utco
mes
est
imat
ed e
xpen
ditu
res:
For i
nfor
mat
ion
mat
eria
ls
(
) l
ekë
For o
rgan
izat
ion
of m
eetin
gs
(
)
lekë
For p
repa
ratio
n an
d le
galiz
atio
n of
doc
umen
ts
(
) lek
ëto
taL
:im
plem
enta
tion
peri
od:
out
com
e pe
riod
:20
08–2
009
2009
58
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
annex 1: decision of commune council
RePuBLic oF aLBania
counciL oF Fushe Çidhen commune
d e c i s i o n
No. 38, dated 25.12.2007
On “The approval of the Local Development Plan, 2008-2013”
Based on the Law 8652 dated 31.07.200” On the Organization and Functioning of the Local Government in Albania”, chapter IV “Functions and Competences of Council”, article 10 “Exclusive Functions of Communes and Municipalities”, Article 32 “Duties and Competencies of Commune and Municipal-ity Councils”, the Council of Fushë Çidhen Commune in its regular meeting dated 25.12.2007, after discussions on the draft decision No. 38 dated 25.12.2007 “On the Approval of Local Development Plan, 2008-2013”, submitted for consideration by the working group on the development of the local development plan;
d e c i d e d
To approve the Local Development Plan, 2008-2013 of Fushë Çidhen Commune, as at-1. tached.The working group is responsible to follow up the implementation of this decision.2. This decision enters into force 10 days after it is publicly notified.3.
Secretary of Council Chairman of Council
artur spata sali shehi
(signatures and seal)
59
annex 2: analysis of survey of businesses in Fushë Çidhën
Report on Local Business enabling environment survey
A business attitude survey was carried out in three communes in the County (Qark) of Dibër during October 2007. The aim of the survey is to provide information to the planning commission of Arras, Zall Dardha and Fushe Çidhën communes with respect to needs and perspectives of business for their future development, and for help in directing energy, effort and money towards increasing the local economic development of these very poor rural areas of Albania.
The questionnaire that was filled in by respondents from the three villages is based on the one used in 2003 for the DELTA (Developing Economies Locally through Techniques and Alliances) project in five cities (Berat, Durrës, Korça, Lezha and Shkodra) of Albania in 2003, with some slight modifications.
This survey was carried out in close collaboration with the head and staff of each commune and the staff of Dibër County Council. Mr Erind Kraja undertook the survey, which was analysed by Dr Iain Wilson.
General information
Samples (Q. 1)
Thirty businesses were surveyed and opinions were collected from the following interviewees: owner, 25 businesses (83%); and employee in two businesses (7%).
Type of business (Q. 2)
Most (70%) of the businesses were farms. Eleven (37%) grew crops exclusively, six raised live-stock (20%) and four undertook both types of farming (13%). Six (20%) were traders, two (7%) provided services and one was a constructor.
Ownership (Q. 3)
All of the respondents who answered this question (83%) said that the businesses had one owner.
Type of produce (Q. 4)
Six respondents specified they produced wheat and corn, with five of them also producing beans, fruit or vegetables, or a combination of these. Four respondents specified agriculture, including one with also livestock and orchards. Three respondents specified they produced meat and dairy produce, and two just livestock. Three respondents were involved in trade, and one each in bee-keeping, producing fodder, milk and corn, various foods, doors and windows, and construction. There was also one carpenter and one who put down ‘various’.
60
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Length of time in operation (Q. 5)
The length of time that the businesses had been active ranged from two to seventeen years, with the average being nine years.
Marketplace (Q. 6)
Thirty-seven per cent of businesses sold 100 per cent of their produce locally, while others gave a figure ranging from 20 per cent to 90 per cent. Eighteen (60%) businesses sold all of their pro-duce within the region. Seven (23%) businesses sold between 10 per cent and 40 per cent of their produce elsewhere within the country but none exported.
Number of employees (Q. 7)
Twenty (67%) of the businesses had five employees or less (eleven of them had just one employee), three had between six and ten employees and two had between eleven and fifty employees.
Views of business environment
Extension of activity (Q. 8)
Eight businesses (27%) reported that they would extend their activity within the commune, three (10%) outside the commune. One simply reported it would extend its activity, while eighteen (60%) said they did not plan to do so. None had plans to export their produce outside of the country.
Difficulty in finding trained staff (Q. 9)
Most (77%) respondents said they did not have difficulty in finding qualified staff.
Areas of staff training (Q. 10)
Despite the fact that most businesses did not have difficulty in finding adequately trained staff (Q. 9), most (57%) felt that their business would benefit from training in Marketing and Sales, 23 per cent each in Budgeting and Finance, 17 per cent in Technical Skills, 13 per cent in Management, but none required training in Computer Skills. One respondent ranked Technical Skills above Marketing and Sales.
Main source of competition (Q. 11)
Twenty-one (70%) businesses reported they faced some competition: from imports (47%, includ-ing one specifying contraband and a carpenter specifying ‘finished articles’), from increase in number of traders (10%), two businesses referring to ‘unfair competition’ (which could be added to the competition from imports), one putting down ‘informal market’, and one ‘honey flavoured artificially’.
61
Benefit of businesses associations (Q. 12)
Most (93%) respondents felt that business associations could help develop businesses locally, with only two thinking they could not.
Naming business associations (Q. 13)
Two (7%) respondents named Seta as a local business association, one mentioned the Associa-tion of Agriculture, Livestock and Forests, eleven (37%) respondents said there were no business associations present locally, while most (53%) did not answer the question.
Future investments (Q. 14)
Most (87%) respondents said they would make future investments. Twenty-seven per cent specified agriculture (one of which also specified livestock), 23 per cent put down livestock, ten per cent specified trade, and two respondents specified fruit growing (one of which also put down vegeta-bles). One respondent specified construction, one increasing number of bees, and one carpentry machinery. One respondent would not make future investments and two didn’t know.
Factors impeding business expansion (Q. 15)
Only two respondents did not give reasons preventing expansion of their business. The top is-sue was infrastructure (17%), irrigation (17%), electricity supply (13%), giving a total score for infrastructure in general of 47 per cent, followed by lack of agricultural machinery, capital, trade and good breeds (each 7%). Unfair competition, use of herbicides, small wages, blocking of construction, rising fuel costs and lack of guaranteed wood supply each were recorded by one respondent.
There was a very wide range of second main reasons given, including lack of loans and irriga-tion (10% each), followed by competition with imports and unfair trade, lack of infrastructure, trade and good roads, and finally lack of funds, storage and telecommunications, presence of an informal market and increasing numbers of traders, increased prices, and lack of seeds and a guaranteed market.
The third most important issue was generally infrastructure (10%), followed by lack of electricity and of trade, high costs, imports and, finally, lack of purchasing power, processing, market, top quality seeds, telecommunications and quality fertiliser, and unfair competition.
Just less than half (47%) the respondents put down a fourth most important issue, and these in-cluded lack of agricultural machinery, credits and trade, presence of imports, poor infrastructure, transport difficulties, poor quality fertiliser and lack of electricity.
Only one in five respondents put down a fifth issue, and these included lack of infrastructure, telecommunications, irrigation, mechanisation and agri-businesses, and high transport and other costs.
62
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
assessment of local institutions
Time spent on obtaining licence or permit (Q. 16)
Two-thirds of interviewees answered this question, with responses ranging from one day to 60 days to obtain permission, with an average among those that answered of 10.7 days.
Specific issues affecting business (Q. 17)
The two biggest problems that businesses have with local government is the informal economy and high costs (37% and 30%, respectively, saying it has a great impact), followed by unfair competition and too frequent rule changes (10% each). Corruption had a serious affect on only seven per cent of businesses. The other issues (wasting time, rules overlap, rules too complex and unpredictable requirements) were not regarded as having a great influence on their business.
Issues with some impact on many businesses included rules too complex (47%), high costs (40%), informal economy (37%), rules overlapping (30%), unpredictable requirements and time wasted (20% each), unfair competition (17%), corruption (13%) and frequent rule changes (10%).
Issues that most businesses had no effect on their performance included frequent rule change (73%), time lost (67%), unpredictable requirements and corruption (both 63%), rules overlapping and unfair competition (both 60%). Forty-three per cent of businesses thought that rules being too complex had no effect on their business.
How Commune can help business (Q. 18)
Only one respondent ranked the areas in which the commune might help local business (in de-creasing order: infrastructure, training and provision of information). Most (80%) businesses though that the local government could improve infrastructure, 43 per cent thought it could improve its tax policies, 40 per cent thought it could provide training and expertise, 23 per cent thought it could provide information on business opportunities, and two respondents thought it could improve procedures related to business. One respondent thought the commune could help with agriculture and livestock.
How often inspected by authorities (Q. 19)
For the following analysis no information was provided on whether a fine or bribe had been paid.
Two (7%) businesses had been visited, one on two occasions and one on five occasions, in the previous year by the local Directorate of Taxes and Fees. On all these occasions the visit was reasonable. Seven respondents thought such a visit does not apply. The business that had been visited five times also received two visits from the Sanitary Inspection and one from the licence authority (he grows corn, wheat and vegetables!!!).
Five (17%) businesses had been visited, one business three times and two businesses twice, in the previous year by the local Sanitary Inspection. All of these visits were reasonable. Six (from
63
the same seven as for the Directorate of Taxes and Fees above) businesses thought such a visit does not apply.
Five (26%) businesses had been visited once, two business at least once and five businesses twice, in the previous year by Commune officials. Of the twelve businesses receiving a visit, ten said it was reasonable. Eight respondents said such a visit does not apply.
Two businesses had been visited by the licensing authority, one on five occasions. All visits were reasonable. Seven (23%) respondents thought a visit by the licensing authority does not apply.
One respondent had received a visit by the environmental authority. Nine (30%) respondents thought such a visit does not apply.
Seven respondents had received visits by the local government police (four for issues of taxes). All visits were seen as reasonable. One respondent thought a visit unreasonable and had not been visited. Five respondents thought a visit does not apply.
None had received visits by other officials.
Factors supporting management efficiency (Q. 20; see Table 1)
table 1. Question 20: Please evaluate each of these factors for the supportive role they play in increasing the effectiveness of management of your business
Factors that help business no problem Little problem Big problem n/aQuality of roads 4 26Permits and licences for exercising activity 10 12 2 3Supply with electricity 2 3 22 3Supply with water 5 13 9 1Environments where business is active / land 16 7 4 2Protection by police 27 2Protection from fire 22 7Urban planning and zoning 13 7 3 6Tax levels 17 10 1Hospitals and health care 11 16 1 1Education system 11 15 1Costs for telecommunications 4 6 16Crime, theft and lack of order 16 11Quality of local governance 27 1Residential costs 21 6 1Lack of qualified personnel 15 12 1Corruption 23 2 1 1Access and costs for financial resources 11 11 5Effective services to support businesses 7 17 1 2
Issues that were mostly regarded as a big problem for effective management of their business included roads (by 87% of respondents), electricity (73%), telecommunications costs (53%) and
64
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
water supply (30%, with 43% thinking it was a slight problem). Issues that were mostly regarded as a slight problem or no problem at all included business support services (57% and 23% re-spectively), healthcare (53%, 37%), education (50%, 37%), water (43%; 17%), lack of qualified personnel (40%; 50%) and permits and licences (40%; 33%), crime (37%; 53%), access and costs of financial resources (37%; 37%), level of taxes (33%; 57%), property issues (23%; 53%) and urban planning (23%; 43%). Police protection, quality of local governance, corruption, fire protection, residential costs, were regarded as not a problem by, respectively, 90, 90, 77, 73 and 70 per cent of respondents.
Level of support for local SMEs (Q. 21)
Most respondents thought that NGOs (80%), international organisation (73%), professional as-sociations (70%), business associations (63%) and regional economic development offices (47%) were irrelevant to provision of support to SMEs in the commune, with between three per cent (for local government) and 33 per cent (for regional economic development office) not knowing. One half of respondents thought that the local government provided good support, and one-third thought it satisfactory, and 23 per cent private professional service providers gave good support, while 20 per cent and 17 per cent, respectively, thought the service providers and professional associations were not doing a good job.
Level of cooperation with local institutions (Q. 22)
The Mayor’s Office, Commune Tax Office and Commune Council were regarded by 77 per cent, 57 per cent and 50 per cent of respondents, respectively, as being very supportive. These offices were regarded by another substantial group as slightly supportive (17%, 30% and 30%, respectively). The District Tax Office was regarded by 17 per cent of respondents as not supportive, and ten per cent thought that of the Prefect. Thirty-seven per cent and 40 per cent, respectively, thought the Regional LED Office was irrelevant or they did not know.
Local office supportive of business (Q. 23)
Most respondents (80%) did not know of an office that had helped their business. However, three named the Tax and Finance Office, two the Mayor’s Office and one the Services Office.
Local office NOT supportive of business (Q. 24)
Nearly all (90%) of respondents did not know of an office that negatively impacted their busi-ness.
Local office that deals with LED (Q. 25)
Most (80%) of respondents said they did not know of an office in their commune that deals with local economic development. Three respondents (10%) gave the Mayor’s Office, and one each the Services Office and Finance and Tax Office.
65
Group most active in stimulating LED (Q. 26)
Ten (60%) respondents thought the commune government was most active in stimulating LED, two (7%) thought a private-public partnership organisation, another seven per cent put down both of these and six (20%) did not know. Of the 22 that ticked an organisation, ten (45%) thought the Commune did not even partially finance that organisation (including six that had ticked ‘Commune’). Of the seven that thought the commune gave financial support to an organisation stimulating LED, three ticked ‘private business association’.
Group that deals with LED in commune (Q. 27)
Most (63%) respondents thought the Mayor’s Office deals with LED issues, while two thought that LED activities are decentralised and performed by several departments in the commune.
Views on economic development
Three sectors with quickest growth in commune (Q. 28)
Most respondents (53%) put down agriculture as the most rapidly growing sector in the commune, followed by livestock (20%). Three (10%) listed orchards, and one each infrastructure, trade and beekeeping. Two respondents put down ‘None’. Forty-seven per cent put down livestock as the second fastest growing sector, and thirteen per cent each put down orchards and agriculture. One respondent each put down irrigation, trade, bee keeping and transport. Thirty-seven per cent put down orchards as the third fastest growing sector in the commune, followed by livestock (17%) and agriculture (10%). Handicrafts, exports, trade, services, transport and woodlands were each put down once by one respondent.
Three sectors with quickest decline in commune (Q. 29)
One-third of respondents put down construction as the sector experiencing the most rapid decline locally, followed by agriculture (10%). Two each put down orchards, transport and woodlands. One each put down trade, infrastructure, pastures, handicrafts, education, livestock and irrigation. Four (13%) put down ‘None’.
Trade and construction (13% each) were seen as the second fastest declining sectors, followed by tourism (10%). One respondent each put down agriculture, education, forestry, health, irrigation, livestock, milk processing, orchards, services, transport and drinking water supply.
Tourism was seen by ten per cent of respondents as the third most rapidly declining sector, fol-lowed by construction (7%). One respondent each put down agriculture, bee keeping, business, electricity, handicrafts, health and irrigation.
66
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
Three most attractive aspects for business development in commune (Q. 30)
The most often quoted most attractive local aspect for business development was location (20%), followed by climate (13%), agricultural land and pastures, and environment (10% each), and by taxes and irrigation canals (7% each). One respondent each put down dairy produce, electricity, experience and willingness, fruit produce, labour force, level of education, soil quality and water resources.
The second most attractive aspects were environment and climate (13% each), location (10%) agricultural land and topography (7% each). Other aspects that received one mention were dairy produce, economic situation, electricity, emigration, extension of agriculture, livestock, mecha-nisation, vegetable produce and willingness to work.
The third most attractive aspects each received a single mention: fertilisers, labour force, location, mechanisation, mountain tourism, orchards, strong winds, taxes and willingness to work. Most (70%) respondents did not give a third aspect.
Three most impeding factors (Q. 31)
Poor infrastructure was the most common important factor impeding business development. This was broken down into infrastructure in general (20%), electricity supply (27%), irrigation (10%) and roads (7%), a total of 64 per cent. This was followed by concern with the construction of the Skavicë hydro-electricity power station reservoir being built locally and lack of mechanisation (7% each), followed by lack of capital, poor transport, blocking of much construction work, lack of breeds and poor telecommunications.
Poor electricity supply was the second most important factors most commonly mentioned (20%), followed by poor roads (13%), drinking water, high prices, lack of irrigation and infrastructure in general (7% each). Lack of capital, market, mechanisation, telecommunications and workers, price of labour and use of herbicides were each given once.
There were only fourteen responses to which was the third most important factor, with poor infrastructure (10%) being the most common, followed by competitive trade and the informal market, and lack of water and good quality fertilisers (each with 7%). Roads and choice of seeds were mentioned once each.
Change in business over last three years (Q. 32)
Nearly two-thirds (60%) of respondents thought that the business environment had remained stagnant over the past three years, with one third thinking it had improved.
Three activities to contribute to LED in commune (Q. 33)
The main activities that respondents would undertake towards helping improve LED would be to maintain a clean environment and improve quality of produce (10% each), followed by improving
67
breed stock and the irrigation system and investing in education (7% each), with one respondent each putting down credits, agriculture, dairy, planting orchards, participating actively in community work, communal construction projects and improving the electricity supply.
The second most mentioned important activity for contribution was improving livestock (10%) followed by reducing the price of produce (7%). Other activities that were mentioned once were seeds, marketing, tailoring, ensuring fuel supply for machinery, investing in the irrigation system, improving the road infrastructure and being responsible.
Description of economic base in commune over last five years (Q. 34)
The most common view on how the economy had changed over the previous five years was that it had shown slow growth (80%). Only seven per cent of respondents thought it had remained the same, while one respondent thought it had grown quickly. Three respondents (10%) did not answer the question.
68
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
69
70
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
71
72
Fu
shë
Çid
he
n c
om
mu
ne
, diB
Ra
co
un
ty
73