CM/GC Overview

David Saenz

CM/GC Overview [email protected]

April 8, 2005

CM/GC Overview

•CM/GC Plan & Status

•Systems Description

•Cost Estimate

•Construction Schedule

•Risks and Challenges

•Summary

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CM/GC Plan

Why do we need a CMGC (Construction Manager & General Contractor)

SLAC does not have the in-house expertise to independently manage a project of this magnitude

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CM/GC PlanSOW for CM/GC has been developed and continues to have the highest priority in the CF group as largest stand-alone procurement in the LCLS project

Currently being reviewed by SLAC SO DOE

Comments being updated as we speak

Once approved by SLAC SO DOE, the plan is to submit to DOE Headquarters for approval (Chicago → DC)

Once plan is approved, there will not be a need to go back for multiple review and approval of bid packages

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CM/GC Plan – cont’d

Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) has been written and continues to be updated as necessary (signed copy on LCLS website)

Meeting planned Milestones are crucial!

Advertisement placed in construction periodical – ENR Magazine Jan/Feb

David Saenz


April 8, 2005


CM/GC services will be solicited as firm-fixed price contracts

Phase 1 – preconstruction servicesPhase 2 – construction services of underground and major excavation effort, and construction services of above ground buildings

CM/GC Award 6/30/05CM/GC qualifications – partial list

Technical competenceSimilar previous experienceSuccessful history using second and third tier subcontractorsFinancial strength

David Saenz


April 8, 2005


Outstanding safety record Experience Modification Rate (EMR) <.81

EMR 1.0 indicates that a company submits injury claims that are considered average among their industry groupEMR > 1.0 indicated that the company files more claims than other similar companiesEMR<0.81 indicates that the company had filed fewer claims than those compared against similar companies

Injury frequency and severity ratesSafety Program evaluation and evaluations of the key personnelOSHA citation historyReferences from previous projectsEvaluation of the contractors’ integration of safety into their work practices

LCLS has decided to place all contractors working on projects to have an EMR of <.81, go no-go

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CMGC P3 Schedule

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CM/GC Phase 1 EffortPhase 1 – preconstruction activities to include:

Provide effective overlap period and oversight of effort during Title IIEstimates during Title II CPM ScheduleIdentify lead-time for critical itemsDesign coordination

Constructability reviews Value Engineering reviews

Site investigation

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d

Develop Project Management Plan (PMP)Construction Management Plan – outlines project scope, organization, and specific approach to accomplish projectProject Safety Plan – project specific identifying job hazards, safety performance and individuals responsible for project safetyProcurement Plan – identifies systems, methods and procedures for solicitation to subcontractorsQuality Control and Assurance Plan – method of controlling time, cost and quality of various management tasks specific to the project

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d

Develop construction bid packagesDevelop list and contact potential biddersDevelop prequalification criteriaSolicit bidsRecommend award to SLAC for approval of subcontractorAward contract to subcontractors

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CM/GC Phase 2 EffortPhase 2 – CM/GC shall provide all materials, labor, and services required to construct the Project

All general conditions including field personnel, office staff, temporary offices, temporary construction, safety implementation, construction equipment, coordination of all subs, project administration, construction waste management, commissioning

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

Below Grade Plan

Beam Transport Hall

Undulator Hall

Near Hall

Far HallXRTDT

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

Beam Transport Hall – 227m long above grade facility to transport the electron beam through the existing RSY

Central Lab Office Complex – office facility to house ~ 300 LCLS researchers, engineers, technicians, administrative staff and visiting experimentalists

Far Experimental Hall – underground cavern/tunnels to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shop space

X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel – 250m long underground tunnel used to transport photon beams from NEH to FEH

Near Experimental Hall – underground facility whose primary function is to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shops

Front End Enclosure – 30m long underground facility to house various diagnostic equipment in support of the photon beam

Undulator Hall – 175m long underground tunnel housing undulators and ancillary equipment

Electron Beam Dump – 40m long underground facility used to separate the electron and x-ray beams

New Facilities (below grade)

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

LCLS Site PlanSpear Pep Ring Road

SLC

SLC Tunnel

Research Yard

Pep Tunnel

Survey Tower

Beam Transport Hall

FutureBeam Lines

NEH

X-Ray Transport

Beam DumpFront EndEnclosure

Office ComplexUndulator Hall

FutureOffice Space

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

• IN RESEARCH YARD

• 227 M LONG

• 15’ x 14’-9” (W x H)

• 63 M HEADHOUSE

• 72” THICK WALLS

• 48” THICK CEILING

• 3 SERVICE AREAS

• ENDS IN HEADWALL

• HEADWALL LABYRINTH

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

UNDULATOR HALL

• UNDER HILL

• 175 M LONG

• 21’-11” x 14’-6” (W x H)

• 33 UNDULATORS

• HEAVY GRANITE SLABS

• MONOLITHIC FLOOR

• THERMAL BARRIERS

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

UNDULATOR HALL

ELECTRON BEAM DUMP

• UNDER PEP RING RD.

• 40 M LONG

• 15’ x 12’-6” (W x H)

• CAST-IN-PLACE

• GROOVED FLOORS

• E-BEAM DIPS DOWN

• HEAVY METAL SHEILD

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

FRONT END ENCLOSURE

• EAST OF BEAM DUMP

• 29 M LONG

• BETWEEN SHEILDS

• 15’ x 12’-6” (W x H)

• CAST-IN-PLACE

• NUMEROUS EQUIP.

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

UNDULATOR HALL

ELECTRON BEAM DUMP

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL

FRONT END ENCLOSURE

• EAST OF FEE

• 39 M LONG

• 2 FLOORS

• 3 HUTCHES

• LASER BAY (ABOVE)

• CLOC FACILITY ABOVE

• PREP & CONTROL AREA

• FREIGHT ELEVATOR

• CUT & FILL TECHNIQUE

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

UNDULATOR HALL

ELECTRON BEAM DUMP

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

FRONT END ENCLOSURE

• WITHIN NEH

• TOTAL 3 (CURRENT)

• ANOTHER 3 (FUTURE)

• 10 M x 10 M

• SHEILDING NEEDED

• HEAVY SLIDING DOOR


NEH HUTCHES

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

UNDULATOR HALL

ELECTRON BEAM DUMP

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

X-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL

FRONT END ENCLOSURE


• EAST OF NEH

• 250 M LONG

• 18’ WIDE CONSTANT

• BEAM SPLITS IN THREE

• LABYRINTH TO FEH

• WALKWAY ALONG BEAM

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

UNDULATOR HALL

ELECTRON BEAM DUMP

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

FAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL

FRONT END ENCLOSURE


X-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL

• END OF X-RAY TUNNEL

• 29 M LONG

• 2 CAVERN/TUNNELS

• 31’ x 21’ (W x H)

• CONNECTING TUNNELS

• OFFICES IN EXTENDED CAVERN

• ACCESS TUNNEL

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL

UNDULATOR HALL

ELECTRON BEAM DUMP

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CLOC Floor Plans

• Headcount of CLOC Personnel = 284

• Capacity of Conf Center = 150

• Gross square footage of CLOC (offices and labs) = 68,800sf

CLOC Exterior Elevations

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CLOC Exterior Elevations

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

CF FY Total Estimated Cost

1.09 Conventional FacilitiesTEC Total $76.75M

(fully burdened & escalated)

.43

37.15

8.98

20.11

1.72

8.36

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

Prior FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

CMGC is responsible for ~$500K for Phase I (Award CMGC thru March 06) and $59.5M for Phase II (Mar 06 thru 08)

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

LCLS CF Construction Schedule

•Major construction phase FY 06 at 30 months duration•Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical system interfaces •Site-work at NEH is key!

•Added additional time for CM/GC procurement phase:

DOE approval and CM/GC subcontractor bidding phase

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

Title-II Draft ScheduleTitle II Milestones Due Dates Kick-Off Meeting 28 Mar ‘05 Freeze Design (FEH, Und, etc.) 08 Apr ‘05 Update Design Basis Freeze Title II Design Schedule 30% Design Review (Cypress, CA) 26-27 May ‘05 Status Review (catch errors at this time!) Value Engineering Session 16-17 Jun ‘05 Construction Cost and Schedule Estimate (revised) 60% Design Review (Stanford, CA) 11-12 Aug ‘05

Design Drawing Review Construction Schedule Review Construction Estimate Review Preliminary Specifications

90% Design Review (Stanford, CA) 18-19 Oct ‘05

Design Drawings Specifications Calculations Construction Estimate Review

SLAC Review & Approval 20 Oct ’05 thru Safety Committees Review & Approval 23 Nov ‘05 Stanford University Review & Approval Incorporate Comments into Final Design 100% Title II Complete 30 Nov ‘05

Interactive Planning session is scheduled for April 13,14

This is essentially JE 100% stage

(6/05) CMGC has real value added input early during design phase

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

Risks and Challenges

• Construction Safety– All construction activities to comply with Federal and State environmental, safety, health and building codes

• Subcontractor activities• In-house activities

– SLAC will approve construction safety program prior to start of construction

•Enhanced construction program is a must

– Special consideration is being addressed • Tunnel construction• RSY due to the congestion in the area

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

Risks and Challenges – cont’d

• Bay area construction market– Materials – Labor

• Schedule concerns– Annual lab shut-down periods– Schedule for site characterization & remediation– FFTB decommissioning– On-site support

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

Summary

• Confidence is high for the successful implementation of the model chosen as it has already been proved at LBNL Molecular Foundry•CMGC holds the paper•Actual cost will be determined by competitive bids from subcontractors•Total estimated pricing established by SLAC

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

End of presentation

David Saenz


April 8, 2005

Additional data

•All subcontractor bids and award of contracts will be pre-approved by SLAC•Subcontractor bid award amounts added to CM/GC contract

•Technical Documents:–CM/GC Statement of Work–General Requirements (01010)–Special Requirements (01210) –Schedules (01325)–Construction Waste Management (01570)–Schedule of Performance Milestones

CM/GC Overview

Documents

Transcript of CM/GC Overview