CHI feedback rapport 1

#chikul12Leuven, 6 March 2012

Erik Duvalhttp://erikduval.wordpress.com

@ErikDuval

1

2

http://www.slideshare.net/erik.duval

3

6 maartfeedback 1, brainstorm, scenario, paper prototype13 maart: brainstorm + scenario op blog16 maart: plan voor evaluatie op blog

20 maartevaluatie paper prototype27 maart: evaluatie op blog + plan volgende iteratie, incl. evaluatie &implementatie

17 april (?) iteratie, hci@sigchi, capgemini case

24 april iteratie, hci future, namahn case

15 mei demo’s, lessons learned (met externe deelnemers)

13u30-14u00: welcome, overview, feedback

14u00-14u30: groups process feedback

14u30-15u00: introducing topic of project

15u00-16u00: Marcus - brainstorm

16u00-16u30: student pitch to each other

16u30-17u00: revisit basic idea

17u00-18u00: storyboard

18u00-19u00: paper prototype4

but first...

5

how much time did you work?

6

using twitter...

using twitter...

hoe lang gebruiken jullie google+ ?

9

wie denkt google+ te blijven gebruiken?

10

http

://w

ww

.hln

.be/

hln/

nl/4

125/

Inte

rnet

/art

icle

/det

ail/1

4017

52/2

012/

02/2

9/G

ereg

istr

eerd

e-ge

brui

kers

-blij

ven-

weg

-van

-Goo

gle.

dhtm

l

http

://ni

euw

sbla

d.be

/art

icle

/det

ail.a

spx?

artic

leid

=20

1202

2813

6770

wie ontwikkelt mobiele apps?

13

feedback 1st report

14

15

16

criterium (waarom?)

methode (alternatieven?)

data (voorstelling!)

analyse (so what?)

conclusie

why?this should be basis for choosing method!

why?this should be basis for choosing method!

good

good

bad: proxy?

bad: proxy?

well done!wel

l don

e!

‘gewoon’ problemen ontdekken?

How exactly?Response rate?

How exactly?Response rate?

SUS vs. experience?individual SUS scores?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

well done!

well done!

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

...indeed...

...indeed...

...very well done...

...very well done...

details?

details?

the user is always right!

the user is always right!

#awesomness ;-)

#awesomness ;-)

how does google try to tackle this?

how does google try to tackle this?

externe commentaar?

39

did anyone try to get respondents or disseminate results on google+?

40

keep reports - I may ask them back!

41

post: what did you learn about google+ and about evaluation

(in the session, from comments)

by 9 March

42

Vragen...?

44

Tom De Bie 7,1 13

Michiel Staessen 11,82 20

Bram Gotink 5,42 15

Glenn Croes 11,73 15

Stijn Adams 10,54 21

Dommicent Leendert 9,88 16

Jorn Van Loock 9,48 16

Pieter Van Riets 11,98 16

Geert Van Campenhout 7,71 17

Yasin Koyuncu 8,16 17

Robin De Croons 16,68 18

Ward Cools 13,3 19

Anne Everars 12,6 20

Roeland Herrebosch 19,79 20

Svetlana Pak 14,23 20

Tim Ameye 15,49 21

Koen Wellens 13,17 22

Greet Robijns 14,77 23

Niels Avonds 20,48 26

Lieven Billiets 19,74 27

Lesley Van der Wee 26,82 35

Peter Raeves 31,24 35

Niels Billen 20,77 40

Peter Raeves 32,75

Tim Op De Beeck 20,77

Matthias Snellings 12

Beckers Jeroen 12

Thomas Hendrickx 13

Koen Boncquet 14

Robby W 15

Jeroen Claes 16

46

http

://ar

iadn

e.cs

.kul

euve

n.be

/cam

-das

hboa

rd/v

iz/b

logs

chi2

.htm

l

toggle?who is not doing this?

47

names?resolve double identities!

48

individualfor blogging and comments

49

Vragen...?

50