06 Hsu.pdf

download 06 Hsu.pdf

of 61

Transcript of 06 Hsu.pdf

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    1/61

    Wafer Level Vacuum Packaging

    for Sensors

    Wan-Thai Hsu, PhD.

    Chief Technology Officer

    Discera Inc.

    [email protected]

    IEEE Sensors 2012

    Oct. 28, 2012

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    2/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 2

    Outline

    - - -

    -

    - - -

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    3/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 3

    MEMS Sensors

    The past few decades, micro electro-mechanicalsystems (MEMS) becomes the trend of sensor

    designs

    MEMS shows great advantages over traditionalsensors in terms of

    - Size & cost- Sensitivity- Batch fabrication on wafers- Circuit integration

    One of the key factors for successful MEMSproducts is wafer level packaging

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    4/61IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 4

    Why Is Packaging Important?

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    5/61IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 5

    Why Is Packaging Important?

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    6/61IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 6

    Bonding Technologies

    Bonding

    Technologies

    Vacuum

    Level

    Sealing

    Width

    Temp.

    range Note

    Thermal compression without intermediate layers

    Anodic Bonding 1 Torr Yes 200-400oC

    High Na+ content glass wafer is needed, not CMOSfriendly, limited material selections

    Si Fusion bonding 0.01~1 Torr Yes > 1000

    o

    C

    Need low TTV, low roughness, clean surface, the

    resonator may be affected at bonding temp

    Plasma enhanced Sibonding

    0.1~1 Torr Yes 200-250oC Need smooth clean surface

    Thermal compression with intermediate layers

    Epoxy Poor > 500um 150-250oC Out-gassing

    Polymers Poor > 500um 150-250oC Out-gassing

    Glass frit > 1 Torr ~200um 350-500oC Out-gassing

    Au 0.1~1 Torr ~200um 400-450oC Clean surface needed

    Eutectic bonding

    Au-Sn (80/20) ~1 Torr ~100um 280-310oC

    Plated materials need pre-bonding treatment, Au isalso not CMOS friendly

    Au-Si ~1 Torr ~100um ~370oC

    Plated materials need pre-bonding treatment, Au isalso not CMOS friendly

    Al-Ge ~1 Torr ~100um 420~440oC

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    7/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 7

    Vacuum Level by Applications

    Applications Vacuum Level Packaging Technology

    High Q

    Resonators 0.01~0.1 Torr

    Silicon fusion bonding

    Epi-Si encapsulation

    Metal eutectic with getterGlass frit with getter

    Gyroscopes 0.1~1 TorrMetal eutectic

    Metal thermal compression

    Accelerometers 1~10 TorrMetal eutectic

    Metal thermal compression

    Pressure

    Sensors0.5~1 Torr

    Glass frit

    Anodic bonding

    Silicon fusion

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    8/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 8

    Outline

    - - -

    -

    - - -

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    9/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 9

    Anodic Bonding 1

    Principle: one polished glass wafer and onepolished Si wafer are sandwiched at 400C

    A DC voltage of 1000V is applied to move the mobileions to the electrode, leaving O2on Si-glass surface

    The oxygen bond the silicon surface, form a verystrong bond than Si-Si.

    -+

    Vs

    Top Electrode

    Hot Plate

    Glass

    Si

    200C

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    10/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 10

    Anodic Bonding 2

    Bonding starts on the electrical contacts. The bondfront gradually move outwards

    Bond front is sensitive to surface roughness andwill move around the particulates on the surface

    Si Wafer

    Glass WaferElectricalContacts

    Hot Plate

    Bond frontSi

    Glass Bond Interface

    Courtesy: Neil Welch

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    11/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 11

    Anodic Bonding with Ti Getter

    Anodic bonding with Tifilm as getter Use Q of resonators for

    vacuum measurement Without getter: 2 Torr With small getter: 0.7 Torr With larger getter: 3 mTorr

    Packaging & Wire Bonding

    Ti

    1E-4

    1E-3

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    With Ti (Area X5)With Ti (Area X1)Anodic bonding Anodic bonding Anodic bonding

    Without Ti

    Pressu

    re

    [Torr]

    10 100 1000

    100

    1000

    10000

    100000

    LR type I

    LR type II

    VR type I

    VR type II

    Qf

    actor

    Pressure [mTorr]

    Lee et al, J. Micromech. Microeng. 13 (2003) 663669

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    12/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 12

    Anodic Bonding 3

    Pros:- Form a strong bond at low temperature (so metal

    can be pattern on the glass or sil icon wafer)

    - Form a very good hermetic sealing Cons:

    - High voltage may damage CMOS devices- High sodium content from the glass could

    contaminate CMOS wafers

    -Although hermetic, its hard to get high vacuumdue to glass outgas need getter for goodvacuum

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    13/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 13

    Silicon Fusion Bonding

    The Van der Wall force on silicon surface bring twowafers together

    Bonding criteria:- Very clean and smooth surface (

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    14/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 14

    Surface Activation

    Hydrophilic

    OH groups formed on the surfaceafter RCA clean

    OH attract water moisture eventhe wafer is dried

    Bond could init iate at low temp.Si-O-Si is formed after high temp

    post-bond anneal

    Hydrophobic

    After HF release, surface ishydrophobic

    H and F are hanging on thesurface free of oxygen

    Init ial bond is weaker even init ialbond temp is higher

    Si-Si bond is formed after anneal

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    15/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 15

    IR Images of Silicon Fusion Bonding

    Left: Bond wave propagation through the wafer Right: Bond wave is sensitive to surface roughness and

    particulates on the wafer. Voids will be seen under IR after bonding

    Post-bond annealing is needed for bond strength. Voids may beeliminated or reduced after annealing (vacuum may still be kept)

    As bonded

    After annealHarendt et. Al, Sensors and Actuators, A21-23,p. 927, 1990

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    16/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 16

    Plasma Assisted Fusion Bond

    Plasma (O2, N2, Ar, NH3etc) is used to create roughsurface as well OH bonds on the surface

    Activate the bonding surface like hydrophilic activation Due to plasma activation, the post bond annealing can

    be reduced from 1000C to 400C major advantage

    Accep

    tedMan

    Kowal et al Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 155(1), pp. 145151.

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    17/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 17

    Fusion Bonding

    Pros:- Very strong bond- No intermediate layer is needed- Various surface activation for different

    processes both clean and release

    - Cap and device wafers have same CTE Cons:

    -High temperature post-bond anneal isneeded to ensure bonding quality (mitigated

    by plasma activated surface)

    -Require very clean and very smooth surface

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    18/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 18

    Glass Frit Bonding 1 Frit Printing

    Glass fri t consists of- glass base: with lead content to reduce

    melting point

    - Filler: provide CTE match- Solvent: provide fuididity

    Glass fr it is applied on the screen andstencil. The fri t is swiped through the wafer

    with coating blade. The frit is then patterned

    on the wafer.

    Wafer

    Drying (120C)glazing (300C) sealing (440C) bonding (450C)

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    19/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 19

    Glass Frit Bonding Process

    Drying: remove solvent @ 120C Glazing: further drive out of organic bond @ 340C Sealing: melt the glass to continuous form @ 440C Bonding: align the wafer, make the bond @ 450C

    Courtesy of R. Knechtel from XFAB foundries

    O f Gl F i

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    20/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 20

    Outgas of Glass Frit

    1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03 1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00 1.0E+01 1.0E+02

    Vacuum (Torr)

    9000

    8000

    7000

    6000

    5000

    4000

    3000

    2000

    1000

    0

    Resonator Qwithout getter

    Roll-off Region~1 Torr

    Desired operationregion 0.01~0.1 Torr

    Q of free-free beam resonator:- Glass frit package with getter: 7500~8000- Silicon fusion bonding: 7500~8000- Glass frit without getter: 3000 (Q degrades due to trapped outgas)

    Th N d f G tt

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    21/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 21

    The Need of Getter

    To order to achieve good vacuum, getter is neededfor absorbing outgas from glass frit

    Non-evaporable getters: normally alloys of Ti, Zr, V,and Fe

    Getter has pil lar type of crystall ine (increase surfacearea) and is usually deposited by sputtering

    Getter is usually activated about 300~450C

    Ref: M. Maroja et al, Proceedings ofSPIE Vol. 4980 (2003) Patterned defined by shadow mask

    R d ti f S li Ri Width

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    22/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 22

    Reduction of Sealing Ring Width

    400um wide 200um wide

    Size and Cost reduction is achieved by simply reducingthe seal ring width from 400um to 200um

    Printed fri t is about 1/2 or 2/3 of the sealing ring 150um sealing ring was doable but suffer from lower

    printed yield very tough to print 75um side line with

    >90% yield

    2003 2005

    Gl F it B di

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    23/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 23

    Glass Frit Bonding

    Pros:-Strong bond strength-Can adopt larger surface topography-Good hermeticity but need getter for

    vacuum

    Cons:-Pb content is being banned by EU and

    Japan-Relatively dirty process-Large material squeeze out

    Thermal Compression Bonding

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    24/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 24

    Thermal Compression Bonding

    Thermal compression bonding islike a welding process. Au, Cu

    and Al are suitable materials

    Welding temp is 300C~400Cwith 20kN to 80kN force

    100um sealing ring can be done

    Thermal Compression Bonding

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    25/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 25

    Thermal Compression Bonding

    Pros:-Easy preparation of materials-Strong bond strength-OK CMOS compatible-Good hermeticity

    Cons:-Requires very clean metal surface-De-oxidation treatment may be needed for

    some materials

    -Large CTE mismatch

    Eutectic Bonding

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    26/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 26

    Eutectic Bonding

    At eutectic temperature, certain composition ofmetals can transfer from solid to liquid

    This temperature is much lower than the meltingtemperature of two individual metals

    The material mix is solidified when the temperaturedecreases below eutectic point or the concentration

    ratio changes (for Si-Au: T < 370 C)

    Alloy Wt% EutecticTemp

    Au-Si 2.9-97.1 370C

    Au-Sn 80-20 280C

    Al-Ge 49-51 419C

    Eutectic Bonding

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    27/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 27

    Eutectic Bonding

    An intermetallic compounds may be formedbetween solder alloy and substrate

    Intermetallic compound may reduce (or enhance)the bond strength

    Prevent solder alloy consume substrate material barrier material (typically SiO2) is needed

    Eutectic Bonding

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    28/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 28

    Eutectic Bonding

    Pros:-Strong bond strength-

    CMOS compatible-Can adopt some surface topography-Great hermeticity

    Cons:-Requires very good control of material

    composition and temperature

    -Large CTE mismatch

    Outline

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    29/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 29

    Outline

    - -

    -

    -

    - - -

    Interconnection/Bonding Matrix 1

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    30/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 30

    Interconnection/Bonding Matrix 1

    Conductive Sealing

    Connect

    from

    Top

    Connect

    from

    Bottom

    Connect

    from

    Side

    Need isolation layer betweeninterconnection and sealing

    Additional or existing layers (Si ormetal) for interconnection

    Step topography make assembly moredifficult

    Allow different material for sealingand interconnection processes can

    be optimized Vias on MEMS wafer: Limited MEMSprocess and bonding temperature

    Allow same material for sealing andinterconnection

    Interconnection process is separatedfrom MEMS

    Allow higher MEMS process temp Cap can be CMOS wafers

    Plated Metal Vias

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    31/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 31

    Plated Metal Vias

    Plated metal (Cu, Au) along thewall of via hole

    Top of the via has smalleropening for better hemeticity

    Hermeticity after thermal cycleis yet to proven (TCE mismatch)

    Conductive seal

    Interconnection

    from the top Sealing ringConnectionVacuum Cavity

    Different shape of through cap viaCourtesy: Silex Microsystems and AAC Microtec

    MEMS

    ePak Package

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    32/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 32

    ePak Package

    Use carrier wafer of SOI or Si ofbonded Si-glass stack for

    interconnection

    -Adv: Great electrical isolation (nodielectric loss)

    -Adv: flexible to many MEMS devices- Disadv: Higher resistivity than metal

    Conductive seal

    Interconnection

    from the top

    Metal Layers

    Device Wafer

    Connection to outside

    Courtesy: ePak

    VFT

    ViaCap

    Isolation Suspension

    SOI or bonded glass

    RF Switch Package

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    33/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 33

    RF Switch Package

    Frit Ring

    Ref: 2001 EUROPEAN MICROWAVECONFERENCE: MARGOMENOS ET AL

    Conductive seal

    Interconnection at bottom

    Au-Au Compression Bonding

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    34/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 34

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03

    Pressure [Torr]

    Q

    Au Au Compression Bonding

    Source: Discera, Inc.

    Conductive seal

    Interconnection from the side

    Interconnection/Bonding Matrix 2

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    35/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 35

    Interconnection/Bonding Matrix 2

    Non-conductive Sealing

    Connect

    from

    Top

    Connectfrom

    Bottom

    Connect

    from

    Side

    Isolation may not be needed betweeninterconnection and sealing Sealing ring needs to overcome the

    topography of interconnection

    Step topography make assembly moredifficult

    Separate process for interconnectionand sealing bonding can be done

    with or without intermediate layer Vias on MEMS wafer: Limit MEMSprocess and bonding temperature

    Vias can be formed before or after thebonding

    Hard to do same bonding process forboth interconnection and sealing

    Can do bonding first and drill/fill via Via holes on cap: via material needs to

    form a good connection to MEMS

    Package with Pinari Gauge

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    36/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 36

    ac age t a Gauge

    Frit Ring

    CHAEet al.:

    FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATIONOF A WAFER-LEVEL MEMS VACUUM PACKAGE,JMEMS VOL. 17, NO. 1, FEB 2008

    Non-conductive seal

    Interconnection from top

    Silicon Fusion Bonding with Via

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    37/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 37

    g

    Non-conductive seal

    Interconnection from bottom

    Glass-Frit Bonding

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    38/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 38

    Source: Discera Inc

    g

    Getter

    Frit Ring

    Vp=2V, OSC=1mVrms, Q=54,270

    -30

    -25

    -20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    1033998 34000 34002 34004 34006 34008 34010

    Amp

    litude(dB)

    -120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Frequency (Hz)

    P

    hase()

    Amp

    Phase

    Non-conductive seal

    Interconnection from the side

    Deposition/Interconnection Matrix

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    39/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 39

    p

    Deposited Cap and Sealing

    Connect

    from

    Top

    Connect

    from

    Bottom

    Connect

    from

    Side

    Build sensors on top of ASIC or buildsensors with buried interconnections

    Deposit sacrificial layer Deposit shell material Etch holes on shell and Release Deposit dielectric to seal the holes

    Build MEMS Deposit sacrificial layer on MEMS Deposit thick shell material Etch holes on shell and Release Deposit dielectric to seal the holes Take signal from top of the shell

    Build resonator with connections Deposit sacrificial layer Deposit shell material Etch holes on shell and Release Deposit dielectric to seal the holes

    Epi-Si Encapsulation

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    40/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 40

    p p

    Double-Clamped Beam:Before cap, Q=14,000

    Ref: Candler et al.,IEEE TRAN. ON ADV.PACKAGING, VOL. 26,

    NO. 3, Aug. 2003

    Deposition seal

    Interconnection

    from the top

    Dielectric Encapsulation

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    41/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 41

    Ref: Lund et al, Solid-State Sensor, Actuator and

    Microsystems Workshop Hilton Head Island, SouthCarolina, p.38-41, June 2-6, 2002

    Deposition seal

    Interconnection from the bottom (CMOS)

    Nitride Shell for RF Switch

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    42/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 42

    Ref: Ebel et al., GOMAC 05

    Deposition seal

    Interconnection from the side

    Silicon Nitride Shell with Resonators

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    43/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 43

    Very difficult stress controland release process

    Relatively poor vacuum -comb-drive did not function

    L. Lin, Selective channel of MEMS: micro-channels, needles,resonators, and electromechanical filters, Ph.D. Thesis, UC Berkeley

    Deposition seal

    Interconnection from the side

    Vacuum Seal with Polymer/Metal Overcoat

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    44/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 44

    Use thermally released polymerto form a cavity

    Polymer overcoat and metalcovered the devices

    Resonator showed Qabout 5000,indicating the pressure is about0.75 Torr

    tChan

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    (d)

    (e)

    Unity

    Polymer overcoat

    etal tC

    tCh

    Insulator

    1m gap beam

    vacuum channel

    polymer overcoat

    gold coating(d)

    0

    1200

    2400

    3600

    4800

    6000

    7200

    8E-07 5E-05 0.005 0 .14 0.38 0.5 0.75 2 5.5 6.5

    Pressure, Torr

    Q

    1.5 M Hz 2 .6 M Hz

    2 .6 M Hz with island 6 .5 M Hz

    Onsetof

    resonance

    Monajemi et al, J. Micromech.Microeng. 16 (2006) 742750

    Measured Q~5000

    New: Deep Vacuum Gap (DVG)

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    45/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 45

    Thickness of density changingmaterial (metal oxides) changes

    after anneal at high temperature

    the gap is formed due to thicknesschange

    CuO + Cu: thickness reduced 46% CuO + Si: thickness reduced 24% CuO + Al: thickness reduced 19%

    Nanogap:From a few to 100nm

    Courtesy: Scannano

    Outline

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    46/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 46

    - - -

    -

    - - -

    Pressure Measurement

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    47/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 47

    Center deflection of a clamped square diaphragm ofdimension aand thickness h

    PaEhw

    =

    4

    3

    2)1(

    0151.0

    Worse resolution while < 1 Torr

    Cavity pressure (Torr) 100 10 1 0.1 0.01

    a (m) 1.00E-03 1.00E-03 1.00E-03 1.00E-03 1.00E-03

    nu 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

    E (Pa) 1.50E+11 1.50E+11 1.50E+11 1.50E+11 1.50E+11

    h (m) 1.00E-05 1.00E-05 1.00E-05 1.00E-05 1.00E-05

    P (Pa) 87978 99975 101174.7 101294.67 101306.667

    w (nm) 8502 9662 9778 9789 9790

    w

    1 atm = 760 Torr 1 Torr = 133.3 Pa

    1mm square, 10um thick diaphragm

    Membrane Vacuum Sensor

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    48/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 48

    Pros:- Very simple no device is needed- Fit almost all the processes

    Cons:- Limited vacuum range > 1 Torr- Poor resolution between 1 Torr

    Pinari Gauge

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    49/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 49

    Pinari gauge measures filaments impedance changecaused by heat loss of fi lament to the ambient It can measure vacuum between 1e-4 Torr to

    atmosphere, depending on the design, material, andits thermal boundary condition

    It can be implemented with MEMS process forvacuum measurement for selected WLP process

    Theory of Pinari Gauges

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    50/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 50

    w, l, t: width, length, thickness of heater

    : Ohmic power generation

    : Heat loss through the gas

    : TCR of the heater

    gap(P) and b: thermal conductivity

    through the gas and through the beam

    : coefficient of fringing heat flux

    Akin et al, IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. 9, NO. 3, MARCH 2009

    Temperature change due to heating

    Plot Taveversus power dissipated on the bridge at

    various pressure

    The slope of the plot is thermal impedanceplot is

    versus pressure

    Example of Pinari Gauges

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    51/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 51

    Different designs and materials give differentcharacteristics of thermal impedance curves

    For better sensitivity in high vacuum- Longer and thinner heaters- Minimize uncontrolled substrate loss- Closer to controlled heat sinks

    Pirani Gauge

    Courtesy of : Warren (Neil) Welch

    Poly-silicon Pinari gauge Metal Pinari gauge on dielectric

    platform for better thermal isolation

    Pinari Gauge

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    52/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 52

    Pros:- Simple design- Fit almost all the processes- Testing is not difficult- Great resolution if the design is right within

    interested vacuum range

    Cons:- Careful design is needed for characterize

    correct range of vacuum- Different thermal boundary condition before

    and after WLP may cause calibration error

    MEMS Resonator Operation

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    53/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 53

    2/1

    3

    0

    0

    2

    2 103.1

    =

    m

    P

    r kdAV

    LhEf

    -75

    -70

    -65

    -60

    -55

    -50

    -45

    19.39 19.4 19.41 19.42 19.43 19.44 19.45

    Amplitude[dB]

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Frequency [MHz]

    Pha

    se[]

    VP=2.5V

    Pin=25dBmQ=8000

    Rx=25k

    Vacuum Package Resonator Example

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    54/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 54

    Contamination fluctuations foand Qfluctuations Typical MEMS resonator mass: 10-13 kg Resonators with lower mechanical stiffness shows

    larger frequency fluctuations lower Q

    Various Resonators

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    55/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 55

    Comb-drive Cantilever Double Clamped Beam

    Free-Free Beam Disk Resonator

    Resonator Sensitivity to Vacuum

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    56/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 56

    Torr

    NormalizedQ

    Vacuum Requirements for Resonators

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    57/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 57

    32K to 19M Comparison

    10,000

    100,000

    1E-06 1E-05 1E-04 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000P (Torr)

    Q(

    32kHz)

    100

    1,000

    10,000

    Q(

    19MHz)

    From B. Wissman, Discera, Inc.

    Resonator Vacuum Sensor

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    58/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 58

    Pros:- Relatively simple design that is compatible

    with many vibrating sensors

    - Fit almost all silicon/polysilicon processes- Good coverage for wide range of vacuum,

    suitable for process development

    Cons:- Different mechanical boundary condition

    before and after WLP may cause Q difference- [not for me] Resonator testing can be tricky

    need correct set up for resonator testing

    Outline

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    59/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 59

    - - -

    -

    - - -

    Conclusions

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    60/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 60

    Wafer level vacuum package is the key forcommercial success of MEMS

    Among all the processes presented, selectthe one that fit the MEMS devices based on- Design compatibility- Material compatibility- Knowledge of testing

    Implement different vacuum sensors in orderto characterize vacuum level for the selected

    wafer level vacuum package

    Calibrate vacuum sensor carefully anddetermine the success of WLP process

  • 8/14/2019 06 Hsu.pdf

    61/61

    IEEE Sensors Oct 28, 2012 Wan-Thai Hsu, Ph.D. p. 61

    Thank You !

    Questions?

    [email protected]