World Bank Document...Training on Small Hydro GIS database and Small Hydro Potential Evaluation...

Small Hydro Mapping in Indonesia

INCEPTION REPORT

July 2014

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

This report was prepared by GESTO, AQUALOGUS and INDONESIA HYDRO Consult, under contract to The

World Bank.

It is one of several outputs from the small hydro resource mapping component of the activity

Energy Resource Mapping and Geospatial Planning Indonesia [Project ID: P145273]. This activity is

funded and supported by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a multi-donor trust

fund administered by The World Bank, under a global initiative on Renewable Energy Resource Mapping.

Further details on the initiative can be obtained from the ESMAP website.

This document is an interim output from the above-mentioned project. Users are strongly advised to exercise caution when utilizing the information and data contained, as this has not been subject to full peer review. The final, validated, peer reviewed output from this project will be the Indonesia Small Hydro Atlas, which will be published once the project is completed.

Copyright © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK

Washington DC 20433

Telephone: +1-202-473-1000

Internet: www.worldbank.org

This work is a product of the consultants listed, and not of World Bank staff. The findings, interpretations,

and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of

Executive Directors, or the governments they represent.

The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and accept no

responsibility for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other

information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank

concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.

The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its

knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for non-commercial purposes as long as full

attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be

addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433,

USA; fax: +1-202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected]. Furthermore, the ESMAP Program Manager

would appreciate receiving a copy of the publication that uses this publication for its source sent in care of

the address above, or to [email protected].

http://www.gestoenergy.com/

http://www.esmap.org/

SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED

GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING

INDONESIA

INCEPTION REPORT

July 2014

SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA

INCEPTION REPORT

i ID.2014.R.003.1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 PROJECT SYNOPSIS .......................................................................................................................................................... 1

2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 2

2.1 ESMAP ..............................................................................................................................................................................2

2.2 THE CONSULTANT .................................................................................................................................................................3

2.3 OBJECTIVES ..........................................................................................................................................................................4

2.4 THE CONSULTANT’S TECHNICAL PROPOSAL ................................................................................................................................5

2.5 CONTENT OF THE REPORT .......................................................................................................................................................7

3 INCEPTION MISSION ....................................................................................................................................................... 8

3.1 PLAN ..................................................................................................................................................................................8

3.2 DATA COLLECTION.................................................................................................................................................................8

3.2.1 Data requests ..........................................................................................................................................................8

3.2.2 Data collected .........................................................................................................................................................8

3.2.3 Key data ..................................................................................................................................................................8

3.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE COLLECTED DATA.....................................................................................................................................12

3.3.1 Dams and Hydropower Projects in operation and planned ..................................................................................12

3.3.2 Hydrological data .................................................................................................................................................17

3.3.3 Forest areas ..........................................................................................................................................................20

3.3.4 Protected areas .....................................................................................................................................................22

3.3.5 Land cover .............................................................................................................................................................23

3.3.6 Land property .......................................................................................................................................................24

3.3.7 Road and Railroad network ..................................................................................................................................24

3.3.8 Morphological data ..............................................................................................................................................25

3.3.9 Administrative boundaries ....................................................................................................................................27

3.3.10 Settlements and population .............................................................................................................................28

3.3.11 Topographic maps ...........................................................................................................................................30

4 THE SMALL HYDROPOWER IN INDONESIA AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL PLANNING .................................................... 32

4.1 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................................................................32

4.1.1 Electricity sector ....................................................................................................................................................32

4.1.2 Other required licenses .........................................................................................................................................36

4.1.3 LocaL Permit .........................................................................................................................................................36

4.1.4 Environmental Administration ..............................................................................................................................37

4.1.5 Forestry Administration ........................................................................................................................................40

4.2 IDENTIFIED STAKEHOLDERS ....................................................................................................................................................41

4.3 IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES .......................................................................................................................................................42

4.4 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PRELIMINARY METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................44

4.5 FINAL METHODOLOGY PROPOSAL ..........................................................................................................................................46

4.6 MILESTONES ......................................................................................................................................................................65

4.7 WORKPLAN ........................................................................................................................................................................66

5 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................................... 67

REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................................... 69


INCEPTION REPORT

ii ID.2014.R.003.1

FIGURES

Figure 2.1 – Objectives of the project Small Hydropower Mapping in Indonesia and Improved Geospatial

Planning. .........................................................................................................................................................................................5

Figure 2.2 – Workflow with the technical approach and methodology from the CONSORTIUM original Technical

Proposal. .........................................................................................................................................................................................7

Figure 3.1 - Existing hydropower capacity and total capacity per region (GW), RUPTL. ..............................................................12

Figure 3.2 - Future hydropower capacity and total capacity per region (GW), RUPTL.................................................................12

Figure 3.3 - Future hydropower projects with PPA agreements. .................................................................................................13

Figure 3.4 - Existing hydropower capacity per type and region (RUPTL data, CONSULTANT analysis). .......................................13

Figure 3.5 - Future hydropower capacity per type and region (RUPTL data, CONSULTANT analysis). ........................................14

Figure 3.6 - Hydropower plants in operation (CONSULTANT analysis). .......................................................................................14

Figure 3.7 - Faulty daily data per month in station Sabang/Cut Bau and Palembang/St. M. Ba. .................................................17

Figure 3.8 - Mean annual rainfall in Indonesia (WorldClim data, CONSULTANT processing). .....................................................19

Figure 3.9 – Mean annual temperature in Indonesia (WorldClim data, CONSULTANT processing). ...........................................20

Figure 3.10 - Forest areas (MoFo data, CONSULTANT processing). .............................................................................................21

Figure 3.11 - Protected areas (WPDA data, CONSULTANT processing)........................................................................................22

Figure 3.12 - Land Cover (MoFo data, CONSULTANT processing). ...............................................................................................23

Figure 3.13 – Land Cover (GlobCover 2010 data, GESTO processing). .........................................................................................24

Figure 3.14 - Road and rails network (VMAP data, CONSULTANT processing). ...........................................................................25

Figure 3.15 - Digital global elevation data (SRTM data, CONSULTANT processing). ....................................................................26

Figure 3.16 - Administrative divisions, regency and city level (GADM data, GESTO processing). ................................................28

Figure 3.17 - Settlements in Manggarai regency, NTT (GNS data, GESTO analysis). ....................................................................29

Figure 3.18 - BIG Cartograms by region. .......................................................................................................................................30

Figure 4.1 – Flowchart for direct appointment method for Small Hydropower. .........................................................................34

Figure 4.2 - Scheme of the AMDAL procedures. ..........................................................................................................................39

Figure 4.3 – The database’s level of access. .................................................................................................................................45

Figure 4.4 - Workflow with technical approach and final methodology. .....................................................................................46

Figure 4.5 - Workflow of small hydro prioritizing process............................................................................................................53

Figure 4.6 - Summary representation of the workflow for the surface runoff modeling. ...........................................................55


INCEPTION REPORT

iii ID.2014.R.003.1

TABLES

Table 3.1 – Meetings during the Inception Mission. ......................................................................................................................9

Table 3.2 – Requested data. .........................................................................................................................................................10

Table 3.3 – RUPTL hydropower projects with unknown location. ...............................................................................................15

Table 3.4 – Identified hydropower plants without RUPTL correspondence. ...............................................................................15

Table 3.5 - Reclassification of the forest areas from the MoFo. ..................................................................................................20

Table 3.6 - Comparison between alternative DEM datasets. .......................................................................................................27

Table 4.1 - Summary of hydro potential. ......................................................................................................................................33

Table 4.2 - Small Hydro Projects Plan for 2013-2022 (RUPTL). ....................................................................................................33

Table 4.3 - Feed-in tariff levels. ....................................................................................................................................................35

Table 4.4 – Other required licenses. .............................................................................................................................................36

Table 4.5 - Electricity and energy utilization activities needed to conduct an AMDAL. ...............................................................38

Table 4.6 - Utilization of forest areas by development activities beside forestry production, P.16/Menhut-

II/2014. .........................................................................................................................................................................................41

Table 4.7 - Workshop sessions target, topics and duration. ........................................................................................................58

ANNEXES

Annex I – Terms of Reference

Annex II – Meeting Reports

Annex III – Data and Info Requirements

Annex IV – Hydropower Plants in Operation

Annex V – List of Hydropower Projects in RUPTL 2013-2022

Annex VI – Proposed MoU


INCEPTION REPORT

iv ID.2014.R.003.1

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AMDAL Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (Environmental Impact Assessment)

ANDAL Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Impact Analysis)

ASTER Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission And Reflection Radiometer

BIG Badan Informasi Geospasial (Geospatial Information Agency)

BMKG Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, Dan Geofisika (Indonesian Agency For Meteorology, Climatology And Geophysics)

BPS Badan Pusat Statistik (Statistics Indonesia)

CSP Concentrated Solar Power

DEM Digital Elevation Model

DivEBT Divisi Energi Baru Dan Terbarukan (New And Renewable Energy Division)

ESMAP The Energy Sector Management Assistance Program

FC Financial Closure

FiT Feed-in-tariff

GADM Global Administrative Areas

GEP Geospatial Electrification Planning

GIS Geographic Information System

GIZ Gesellschaft Für Internationale Zusammenarbeit

GNS Geonet Names Server

GPCP Global Precipitation Climatology Project

GTOPO Global Topography

IHC Indonesia Hydro Consult

IMB Izin Mendirikan Bangunan (Building Construction Permit)

IP Inception Phase

IPP Independent Power Producer

IT Information Technology

IUCN International Union For Conservation Of Nature

IUPTL Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (Electricity Business Permit)

JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency

KA-ANDAL Kerangka Acuan Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Management Plan)

KEN Kebijakan Energi Nasional (National Energy Policy)

LCOE Levelized Cost Of Electricity

LHP Large Hydropower

METI The Ministry Of Economy, Trade, And Industry Of Japan

MHP Mini Hydropower

MoEMR The Ministry Of Energy And Mineral Resources Of Indonesia

MoFo The Ministry Of Forestry Of Indonesia

NASA United States National Aeronautics And Space Administration

NCAR National Center For Atmospheric Research


INCEPTION REPORT

v ID.2014.R.003.1

NCEP National Centers For Environmental Prediction

NGO Non-Governmental Organization

NTB Nusa Tenggara Barat

NTT Nusa Tenggara Timur

OTEC Ocean Thermal Energy Conservation

PEN Pengelolaan Energi Nasional (Blueprint Of National Energy Management)

PLN Perusahaan Listrik Negara (State Electricity Company)

PLTD Pusat Listrik Tenaga Diesel (Diesel Power Plant)

PLTM Pusat Listrik Tenaga Mini (Mini Hydropower Plant)

PLTP Pusat Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi (Geothermal Power Plant)

PPA Power Purchase Agreement

PS Pump-Storage Hydropower

RE Renewable Energy

RKL Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Management Plan)

RPL Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Monitoring Plan)

RUKD Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Daerah (Regional General Plan Of Electricity)

RUKN Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Nasional (Electricity Master plan)

RUPTL Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (Power Supply Business Plan)

RUPTL Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (Electrification Development Program)

SHP Small Hydropower

SHP Small Hydropower

SRTM Shuttle Radar Topography Mission

TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission

UKL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Management Efforts)

UNEP United Nations Environment Programme

UPL Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup (Environment Monitoring Efforts)

USAID United States Agency For International Development

USGS United States Geological Survey

VMAP Vector Map

WB World Bank

WCMC World Conservation Monitoring Center

WCPA World Comission On Protected Areas

WDPA World Database Protected Areas

WMO World Meteorological Organization


INCEPTION REPORT

1 ID.2014.R.003.1

1 PROJECT SYNOPSIS

Project title: Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning in Indonesia

Project Number: Selection No. 1125330

Country: Indonesia

Project objectives: Facilitate and improve the planning and investment process for small hydro

development in both grid and isolated systems through:

a) Building up a central database on small hydro at national scale and validating the mapping of

small hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

b) Improved electrification planning by integrating small hydro potential for the provinces of NTT,

Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi into the planning process

Expected results:

National Small Hydro Resource Database with statistics and relevant GIS data

Small Hydro Mapping Report outlining national information on small hydro in Indonesia,

including maps of existing, planned and potential schemes

A report/annex on small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi for both

grid expansion and isolated systems

Workshop and introductory training in the small hydro GIS database

A list of prioritized small hydro development sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi,

including recommendations for further studies, investigation and monitoring to support the

development of the schemes

Recommendations on improvement of the existing Geospatial Electrification Planning tool to

take into account small hydro potential

Input data on small hydro potential for the least cost geospatial electrification planning for NTT,

Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

Update final reporting coordinated with the parallel contract to give a complete description of

the Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning process in

Indonesia

Final Workshop

Training on Small Hydro GIS database and Small Hydro Potential Evaluation

Contract signing date: February 12, 2014

Project duration after final methodology approval: 22 months


INCEPTION REPORT

2 ID.2014.R.003.1

2 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this Inception Report is to describe the Project approach and methodology in detail, and

to describe the Consultants activities in the Inception Phase (IP) of the Project.

The main objective of this chapter is to inform the reader about the background of this World Bank

project, the Consultant’s Consortium, the objectives of the projects and to outline the contents of the

report.

2.1 ESMAP

The Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) is a global knowledge and technical

assistance program administered by The World Bank and supported by 11 bilateral donors. ESMAP’s

efforts focus on energy security, energy access, and climate change, and involve three core services:

i) analytical work, ii) knowledge clearinghouse, and iii) operational support to The World Bank regions

for technical assistance work at the country level.

Carrying out RE resource mapping and geospatial analysis at the country level helps to scale up the

deployment of biomass, small hydro, solar and wind electricity generation, particularly in countries

where one or more of these sources of power are underdeveloped. This is because such mapping is a

crucial step to developing a policy framework to guide investment in RE electricity generation which,

along with publicly-available data, helps reduce transaction costs and speeds up deployment by

providing commercial developers with:

Increased certainty that projects are likely to be approved or permitted with minimal

bureaucracy and delay

Data transparency and a level playing field, thereby reducing barriers to the entry and limiting

the scope of corruption

A baseline of reliable data that can help guide prospecting activities and can be used for data

verification purposes

A better informed off-taker or purchasing authority, thereby improving the price negotiation

process

In response, ESMAP has launched a new initiative to support country-driven efforts to improve RE

resource awareness, put in place appropriate policy frameworks for RE development, and provide “open

access” to resource and geospatial mapping data. One of the key elements of this ESMAP initiative was

to select consulting firms and establish framework agreements for the procurement of resource data

and mapping services. On the scope of “Small Hydropower Resource Data and Mapping Service”, the

Consultant Consortium (CONSORTIUM) headed by Gesto Energy Consulting (GESTO), also including

Aqualogus, Engenharia e Ambiente (AQUALOGUS) and GAF AG was successfully selected for the

framework agreement with The World Bank.

The current project “Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Planning” is under the scope

of the framework agreement with The World Bank.


INCEPTION REPORT

3 ID.2014.R.003.1

For the renewable energy mapping based on hydropower, The World Bank hired qualified consulting

firms with demonstrated capabilities in providing Small Hydro Power resource mapping and related

services. The Indefinite Delivery Contract commenced on May 28, 2013, and is expected to end by 2017.

The tender for Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Electrification Planning in Indonesia was

released under this contract in late 2013.

For this particular tender, the Consultant’s Association (CONSULTANT) is led by GESTO, and includes

AQUALOGUS and Indonesia Hydro Consult, as a local partner.

After the tenders’ evaluation in early 2014, the World Bank informed the CONSULTAT that it was chosen

to perform the Project. After a period of negotiation the Contract was signed on February 12 2014.

The project will build on previous efforts for the assessment of renewable energy potential and

electrification funded by The World Bank (ASTAE-AusAID-ESMAP), ADB, AusAid, Norwegian

Government, USAID and others. The resource mapping activity is part of a broader World Bank program

of technical assistance that will assist in the implementation of the 1,000 Island Electrification Program

via scaling up renewable energy, resource mapping, geospatial planning and capacity building of key

stakeholders in each of the above areas.

The Terms of Reference for the Tender are presented in Annex I.

2.2 THE CONSULTANT

GESTO, the leading partner, is an international consultant specialized in energy and in the evaluation of

renewable resources. GESTO has know-how and experience in the development of renewable energy

policy as well as master plans and supports all phases of renewable energy project development.

With a wide scope of expertise, including but not limited to, hydro resource study and evaluation,

project analysis and prioritization, and support for projects development, GESTO track record includes,

not only, resource mapping - more than 15 resource maps in the last 4 years – but also, the

development of Hydro Atlas and projects identification for Cape Verde, East Timor, Mozambique and

Angola, and a 5 MW Solar plant development in Cape Verde (Santiago Island) - the largest built in Africa

at that time.

Currently, GESTO presents a worldwide portfolio of concluded and on-going projects: Renewable Energy

Roadmap to 2020 (Cape Verde), Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) Plant Pre-Feasibility Study (Namibia),

Mozambique Renewable Energy Atlas, Angola Energy Vision to 2025, Renewable Electrification Plan of

East Timor and Project Development for Renewable Auctions in South Africa.

Aqualogus, Engenharia e Ambiente (AQUALOGUS) core business is dedicated consultancy and

engineering design services in water and environmental projects. The company has 16 years’ experience

in hydropower projects evaluation, feasibility assessment and design. It has recently

developed/participated a number of studies and designs of hydropower schemes, dams and

environmental assessments, worth highlighting the evaluation of the small hydro potential (<10 MW)


INCEPTION REPORT

4 ID.2014.R.003.1

potential for the Portuguese territory and the Tagus hydrologic region hydropower potential mapping

and location, as well as the following related projects:

Medium and small hydropower plants: more than 30 studies and designs in the last 10 years,

with installed power ranging from 500 kW to 30 MW, in Portugal, Mozambique, Cape Verde and

Brazil.

Large dam designs: several embankment and concrete structures for hydro agricultural schemes

(mostly in the large multipurpose Alqueva project), hydropower and water supply (detailed

design in the last 5 years of Fridão 35 m gravity dam, Daivões 75 m gravity dam, Odelouca 76 m

earth dam).

Environmental impact assessment studies of hydropower plants (more than 15 in the last 10

years) and of hydraulic schemes (more than 20 000 ha of irrigation projects).

Indonesia Hydro Consult (IHC) is one of the fastest growing hydro engineering consulting service

companies in Indonesia. They are leading providers of hydro project solutions and provide high quality

on-site and remote consulting services for growing hydro developers nationwide and give them a

significant development benefit. Their objective is to enhance the success of their clients by providing

solutions for projects and cost-effective consulting services for their business needs.

IHC has expertise in the field of hydro engineering nationwide in Indonesia. The experience gained from

site reconnaissance, planning and studies, design and design reviews, and construction assistances have

made them capable to offer comprehensive consultancy services. Their benefits from the previous

projects enable them to offer improvement at every step of the project. Their experience and resources

enable innovative development to assemble project teams quickly, based on the technical requirements

of each project.

2.3 OBJECTIVES

After the 2013 Scoping Mission by the ESMAP team in Jakarta it was concluded that small hydro can play

a role in clean power generation in Indonesia, and that there was interest from both the public and

private investors to develop small hydro, but that there lacked promotion and coordinated planning of

small hydro development. Hence the ESMAP current contribution for small hydro in Indonesia (Small

Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Planning in Indonesia) has an overall objective to

mainstream small hydro into the planning process for generation growth and electrification planning in

Indonesia.

More precisely the consultancy services have the specific purpose to facilitate and improve the planning

process of small hydro in both grid and isolated systems through establishment of GIS-based databases,

which will help PLN to optimize development and avoid conflicts with long-term maximized utilization of

the resource and to promote and facilitate the role of small hydro in remote areas and in isolated grid

systems, where the need is to go from planning small hydro based on maximized capacity and least cost

http://www.indonesia-hydro.com/projects_undertaken


INCEPTION REPORT

5 ID.2014.R.003.1

of energy, to customizing schemes to demand to get the highest benefit of substituting fossil fuel

generating plants.

The objectives of the project are schematically presented in Figure 2.1.

Figure 2.1 – Objectives of the project Small Hydropower Mapping in Indonesia and Improved Geospatial Planning.

Moreover, the consultancy services will be done in parallel on two vectors following PLN’s interest:

Building up a central database on small hydro at a national scale to be housed in PLN’s central

office in Jakarta.

Improved electrification planning by integrating small hydro potential for the provinces of NTT,

Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi in eastern Indonesia.

The two components will be linked through developing the national database on small hydro in such a

way that it can feed input to the geospatial electrification planning tool, which is in the long-term aimed

to be implemented for the entire country.

2.4 THE CONSULTANT’S TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

The Terms of Reference clearly requested the work to be grouped into two main activities:

Activity 1 – Data collection and production of a national small hydro GIS database, review and

validation of small hydro potential for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

Mainstream small hydro into

the planning process for

generation and electrification

Facilitate and Improve the

planning process

Avoid conflicts with long term

maximized utilization of the

resource

Promote and facilitate de role of small hydro in

remote areas and isolated grid

systems Customizing

schemes (stand alone or hybrid)

to demand to get the highest

benefit of substituting

diesel

Building up a central database on small hydro

(National Level)

Integrate small hydro potential in the improved electrification

(NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi)


INCEPTION REPORT

6 ID.2014.R.003.1

Activity 2 – Support to the inclusion of small hydro potential to the geospatial electrification

planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

As an optional activity, a training component was requested and contracted within the scope of the

project. The training activity aims to provide PLN the required skills to host, operate and further develop

the National Database, as well as to perform the required analysis to prioritize the Small Hydropower

Projects (SHP) in the region, according to the established multi-criteria analysis.

The objectives of Activity 1 are:

To carry out an inception phase and draw an inception report

To create a GIS database for national information on SHP development

To create the list of the most promising SHP sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

To produce the Small Hydropower Mapping Report and promote a workshop for results

presentation to client and relevant stakeholders

The objectives of Activity 2 are:

To create a list of potential SHP sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi to be

incorporated in the Geospatial Electrification Planning (GEP) Tool

To draw policy recommendations on the development of SHP in Indonesia

To produce the Final Report and promote the Final Workshop for the client and relevant

stakeholders

For the development of these activities, the CONSORTIUM proposed a methodology best described in

the workflow of interconnected sub-activities and tasks presented in Figure 2.2.

The original methodology and schedule for the development of the proposed tasks are reviewed in this

inception report.


INCEPTION REPORT

7 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 2.2 – Workflow with the technical approach and methodology from the CONSORTIUM original Technical Proposal.

2.5 CONTENT OF THE REPORT

Chapters 1 and 2 are the introduction to the project. Chapter 3 describes the Inception Mission.

In Chapter 4 we present the project and the final methodology proposal. In this chapter the legal

framework is described and the stakeholders are identified. Key challenges are acknowledged, either in

the project implementation itself or in the overall development of hydropower in Indonesia. These key

challenges lead to some changes in the preliminary methodology. Finally, the proposal for the final

methodology, milestones and work plan is presented.

In Chapter 5 the main findings from the Inception Mission are presented.


INCEPTION REPORT

8 ID.2014.R.003.1

3 INCEPTION MISSION

In this chapter we first present the inception plan, the activities carried out and the meetings held. After

this, we present the data collected up to the present date and its evaluation.

3.1 PLAN

The Inception Mission occurred from March 24 till April 16, in Jakarta, and its main objectives were:

To promote the inception meeting with PLN

To identify any required changes to the methodology

Carrying out a preliminary data collection activity

To identify major stakeholders in the small hydropower development

Assessing major challenges in the project

For its development, Mr. Jorge André and Ms. Joana Santos from GESTO and Mr. Dhani Irwanto and Mr.

Chandra Adriawan from IHC had several meetings with the client, as well as agencies and institutions

currently developing work on hydropower in Indonesia. The program is presented in Table 3.1. All the

meetings were documented in meeting reports, presented in Annex II.

3.2 DATA COLLECTION

3.2.1 DATA REQUESTS

During the Inception Mission, and as suggested in the Terms of Reference from the Request for

Proposals stage, PLN was identified as the most relevant holder of information on small hydropower

development and some data was therefore requested, as presented in Annex III. Most importantly, a

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) regarding the data provision of PLN data to the CONSULTANT

was drafted and submitted to approval, thus establishing the framework, procedures and confidentiality

issues related to said provision (Annex VI).

In the sequence of the meetings held with other relevant stakeholders, additional data was found to be

useful and requested at said meetings. All the requested data is summarized in Table 3.2 in the next

subchapter, along with the data collected up to date.

3.2.2 DATA COLLECTED

The status of the collected data, in reference to the data requested is summarized in Table 3.2.

3.2.3 KEY DATA

From the list presented in Table 3.2, some data held by PLN is considered crucial for the development of

the project, mainly:

JICA study 1999 – Map info database


INCEPTION REPORT

9 ID.2014.R.003.1

PLN’s list of IPP’s request

PLN’s development projects

PLN’s database on existing hydropower plants

Electrical grid dataset

In the event that some of this data may not be available to the CONSULTANT, some potential alternative

approaches are presented in sub-section 4.3.

Table 3.1 – Meetings during the Inception Mission.

Institution Date Participants Objectives

PLN – DivEBT March 25, 5 pm to 6 pm

Moch Sofyan, Sutyio Siswanto, Dhruva Sahai, Jorge André, Joana Santos

Brief team and project presentations Designation of the expected team counterpart First interaction to approach client’s needs and impressions on small hydropower mapping Schedule of follow-up comprehensive kick-off meeting

PLN - DivEBT March 28, 10 am to 11 am

Moch Sofyan, Sutiyo Siswanto, Dhruva Sahai, Dhani Irwanto, Chandra Adriawan, Jorge André, Joana Santos

CONSULTANT presentation ESMAP Framework for Small Hydropower Methodology Team and calendar Next steps

USAID April 2, 12:30 pm to 2 pm

Bill Meade, Farid Siregar, Raymond Bona, Jorge André, Joana Santos

Small Hydropower Mapping project presentation USAID ICED project presentation on hydropower mapping and project development Assessment of the possible points of cooperation

ADB April 3, 8 am to 9 am

Bagus Mundiatoro, Joy Lopes, Chandra Adriawan, Jorge André, Joana Santos

Small Hydropower Mapping project presentation Assess ADB work on hydropower

PLN – DivEBT April 7, 10 am to 11:30pm

Sutiyo Siswanto, Rois Ahmad Hanafi, Dhruva Sahai, Chandra Adriawan, Jorge André, Joana Santos

Status report Operation of the data collection task

JICA April 7, 2 pm to 3 pm

Juraku Masahiro, Chandra Adriawan, Jorge André, Joana Santos

Small Hydropower mapping project presentation Assess JICA work on hydropower

GIZ April 8, 2 pm to 3 pm

Amalia Suryani, Erwina Darmajanti, Ricky Ariwibowo, Chandra Adriawan, Jorge André

CONSULTANT presentation ESMAP framework for Small Hydropower Methodology Calendar Present day

CastleRock April 14, 3 pm to 4 pm

Iwan Adhisaputra Warintoko, Chandra Adriawan, Joana Santos

CONSULTANT presentation ESMAP framework for Small Hydropower Methodology Calendar Present day

PLN – IT Infrastructure

April 16 Achmad Devi Afianto Rois Ahmad Hanafi Joana Santos

Brief presentation of the project Possible requirements and options for the Small Hydropower Mapping project related to the IT department


INCEPTION REPORT

10 ID.2014.R.003.1

Table 3.2 – Requested data.

Requested Data Document/Info Source Collected Data (Y/N) Format Alternative available data Gaps between requested and available data at date

Hydropower Masterplans JICA study 1999 – Map info database

PLN N MapInfo No alternative available

Project for the Master Plan Study of Hydropower Development in Indonesia

JICA Y PDF No gaps identified. Data collected

List of hydropower projects

PLN list of IPP’s request PLN N xls, kml No alternative available This is the main source of data, according to ToR in order to accomplish the assignment PLN development projects PLN N xls, kml No alternative available

RUPTL PLN Y pdf The planned power for the upcoming years is stated in the RUPTL. After an analysis of the document, the location of the hydropower and small hydropower plants needs to be specified

Existing Dams List and characteristics of existing dams, with geographical information

Department of Water Resources (Ministry of Public Works)

N IHC Database and public information This database will allows as to have more certain in the characteristics of the existing dams

Existing Hydropower Plants

RUPTL PLN Y The existing hydropower plants are stated in the RUPTL. After an analysis of the document, the location of the hydropower and small hydropower plants needs to be specified

PLN database PLN N No alternative available

Temporal datasets Stream gauge stations Department of Water Resources (Ministry of Public Works)

N xls The global datasets may provide an alternative, but the quality of information lowers the quality of the outcomes

If no stream gauge stations are provided, it won’t even be possible to assess the uncertainty and error of the global datasets in Indonesia

Meteorological stations Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika (BMKG)

N xls The global datasets may provide an alternative, but the quality of information lowers the quality of the outcomes

If no meteorological stations are provided, it won’t even be possible to assess the uncertainty and error of the global datasets in Indonesia

Spatial datasets Electrical grid PLN N Vector format No alternative available The location of all 20 kV and above substations and transmission lines are a requirement

Forest areas Ministry of Forestry (MoFo) N Vector format Public data from Forest areas in WMS format from the MoFo

The public data is a comprehensive source, but vector format will improve the workability of this information

Protected areas Ministry of Environment N Vector format World Database on Protected Areas The global dataset is a comprehensive source, but the involvement of the competent authority promotes the acceptance of the study findings

Land use GlobCover Y Raster Format GlobCover released a more recent Land Cover, from 2010, than the available in the MoFo database (Landsat 2000). It is considered that the information of GlobCover is sufficient for the execution of the assignment

Isohyets

Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika (BMKG)

N Raster or vector format

Global datasets with mean rainfall (worldclim, reanalysis, etc.)

The information of worldclim will present errors, but is readily available to be incorporated in the project. If some ground stations are provided to assess the error of the Worldclim dataset related to ground measurements, and if the error is acceptable, the Worldclim data may be adopted for a rough characterization of the watershed rainfall

Isotherms Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika (BMKG)

N Raster or vector format

Global datasets with mean temperature (worldclim, reanalysis, etc.)

This information of the worldclim will also present errors, and this error should be assessed with the ground measurements, and if the error is acceptable, adopted to a rough country characterization.

Digital Elevation Model (BIG) PLN N Raster format Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) or Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER).

BIG is a smaller scale DEM, improving the outcomes in relation with the big scale DEMS as SRTM and ASTER


INCEPTION REPORT

11 ID.2014.R.003.1

Requested Data Document/Info Source Collected Data (Y/N) Format Alternative available data Gaps between requested and available data at date

Spatial datasets Road and Railroad network PLN N Vector format Vector Map Level O (VMAPO) The information in VMAP0 is not detailed, but given the scope of the work, roads and rails may not be a strong restriction to hydropower development. Therefore, if no official or local information is available, this global dataset may be adopted for the project

Land property PLN N Vector format No alternative available

Contour data Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG) N Vector format Derived from DEM The quality of the DEM will affect in the quality of the contours derived from them. Official information is more reliable.

Streams and rivers N Vector format Derived from DEM The quality of the DEM will affect in the quality of the streams and rivers derived from them. Official information is reliable.

Administrative boundaries N Vector format Global Administrative Areas (GADM), version 2.0, January 2012

The global dataset is a comprehensive source, but the involvement of the competent authority will supports the authenticity of the information

Topographic maps N Raster format No alternative available

Settlements and population Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) or Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG)

N Vector format Global databases - Vector Map Level O (VMAPO) or Geonet names server (GNS)

The information of the parallel contract for Geospatial electrification permits a single and unified assessment of the load demand. The global dataset does not allow inferring the population, though it is useful to find locations and populated places. The source information if probably from BIG/BPS. It was acquired by PLN for the parallel contract and is required in this project.

Legal framework

Environmental legislation

Government of Indonesia issued Government Regulation No. 27 of 2012

Y Pdf - -

State Ministry of Environment Decree No.11/2006

Y Pdf - -

Forestry legislation Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 1999

Y Pdf - -

Forestry Minister Regulation No.16 of 2014

Y Pdf - -

Dam licensing and hydropower process description

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2012

Y Pdf - -

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2004

y Pdf - -


INCEPTION REPORT

12 ID.2014.R.003.1

3.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE COLLECTED DATA

3.3.1 DAMS AND HYDROPOWER PROJECTS IN OPERATION AND PLANNED

The current and future energy situations were assessed from the Rancana Usaha Penyediann Tenaga

Listrik 2013-2022 (RUPTL). This report contains the current situation and the future projects for each

province. The CONSULTANT has analyzed the RUPTL, encountering difficulties in some systems that

don´t separate their generated energy per type. The future projects were also analyzed, allowing

extrapolating the future energy situation. In the next figures the current and future situation per region

is represented considering that every proposed project in RUPTL is built and no power plant was

decommissioned.

Figure 3.1 - Existing hydropower capacity and total capacity

per region (GW), RUPTL.

Figure 3.2 - Future hydropower capacity and total capacity

per region (GW), RUPTL.

The current situation of future hydropower projects with PPA agreements in PLN is present in Figure 3.3

29.4

5.8 1.9 1.9 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1

40.1

2.5 1.1 0.4 4.0

Jaw

a-B

ali

Sum

ater

a

Sula

wes

i

Kal

iman

tan

NTB

NTT

Pap

ua

Mal

uku

Pap

ua

Bar

at

Mal

uku

Uta

ra

Tota

l

Hydropower Others

54.8

20.5

5.5

5.9 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2

89.7

5.2

3.2 1.9

0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

11.0 Ja

wa-

Bal

i

Sum

ater

a

Sula

wes

i

Kal

iman

tan

NTB

Pap

ua

NTT

Mal

uku

Pap

ua

Bar

at

Mal

uku

Uta

ra

Tota

l

Hydropower Others


INCEPTION REPORT

13 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 3.3 - Future hydropower projects with PPA agreements.

Also from analyzing the RUPTL, the different types of hydropower projects per region were assessed,

along with the total generation capacity in each region. For this purpose, the following definition is

considered:

mini hydro, MHP – under 1 MW;

small hydro, SHP – under 10 MW;

large hydro, LHP – above 10 MW;

pumped-storage hydro, PS – any capacity.

This analysis is showed in Figure 3.4 and Figure 3.5.

Figure 3.4 - Existing hydropower capacity per type and region (RUPTL data, CONSULTANT analysis).

0 50 100 150 200

Operation

Construction

Procurement

Funding process

PPA process

Studies

Proposal

Potential

Terminated

Number of PPA´s

without location

with location


INCEPTION REPORT

14 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 3.5 - Future hydropower capacity per type and region (RUPTL data, CONSULTANT analysis).

Since it is not possible to collect the coordinates of the existing hydropower plants from the RUPTL, their

location was obtained internally using some of the CONSULTANT members own previous experience on

the subject (from the self-built IHC ongoing database: http://www.indonesia-

hydro.com/knowledge_base). From this correspondence some capacity conflicts were encountered and

other plants were identified, as presented in Figure 3.6.

Figure 3.6 - Hydropower plants in operation (CONSULTANT analysis).

http://www.indonesia-hydro.com/knowledge_base

http://www.indonesia-hydro.com/knowledge_base


INCEPTION REPORT

15 ID.2014.R.003.1

Annex IV presents all of the identified plants. A few plants have no correspondence with the mentioned

IHC database, as presented in Table 3.3, thus their location remains unknown

Table 3.3 – RUPTL hydropower projects with unknown location.

Province Name Capacity (MW) Observation

Jawa Timur Madiun 8.1 Location unknown.

Jawa Tengah Selorejo 1.4

This project appears under Jawa

Timur and Jawa Tengah provinces in the RUPTL. Only the Jawa Timur project was located.

Sumatera Barat

Mangani 1.2 Currently under construction. Location unknown.

Napal Melintang 0.6 Currently under construction. Location unknown.

Sumatera Utara Pandan 7.6 Location unknown.

On the other hand, some of the projects referred in the IHC database and identified using satellite image

are not included in the RUPTL (presented in Table 3.4). The status of this hydropower plants will be

confirmed during the execution of the project1.

Table 3.4 – Identified hydropower plants without RUPTL correspondence.

Province Name Capacity (MW)

Aceh Angkup 0.4

Gorontalo Mongango 1.2

Jawa Barat Cijampang 1.1

Cijedil 0.7

Cikaso 5.7

Curug 6.8

Malabar 3.0

Talun 0.2

Jawa Timur Ampelgading 10.0

Giringan 3.2

Golang 2.7

Ngebel 2.2

Wonorejo 6.5

1 Some of the hydropower projects on the list are known to not be selling to PLN, which may be the reason for not to be in the RUPTL, namely Angkup, Malabar, Talun, Balambano (nickel Company), Kareve (nickel Company), Larona (nickel Company), Batubsuk (cement factory), Bahbolon (owned) and Tangga (aluminum company). TULIS is currently not in operation due to social problems.


INCEPTION REPORT

16 ID.2014.R.003.1

Province Name Capacity (MW)

Jawa Tengah Adipasir 3 0.3

Kincang 0.3

Plumbungan 1.6

Rakit 0.4

Sigebang 0.8

Singgi 0.2

Siteki 1.2

Tapen 0.8

Tulis 14.0

NTB Mamak 0.4

Pengga 0.4

NTT Lapopu 1.6

Lokomboro 1 1.0

Lokomboro 2 0.4

Ndungga 2.0

Papua Sinakma 0.3

Walesi 2.9

Sulawesi Barat Bonehau 4.0

Sulawesi Selatan Balambano 130.0

Bungin 3.0

Karebe 140.0

Larona 165.0

Ranteballa 3.3

Sulawesi Tengah Hanga-hanga 2.0

Sulawesi Tenggara Mikuasi 0.5

Rongi 0.8

Sambilambo 5.0

Wining 1.6

Sulawesi Utara Lobong 1.6

Mobuya 3.0

Sulawesi Utara Poigar 1 2.4

Tanggari 1 17.2

Tanggari 2 19.0

Tonsealama 14.4

Sumatera Barat Batubusuk (Indarung) 4.7

Sumatera Utara Bahbolon 2.5

Kombih 1 3.0

Kombih 2 3.0

Tangga 318.0

After this assessment the CONSULTANT considers that it is of great importance to obtain the maximum

official information possible from PLN not only on future projects, but even on existing ones.


INCEPTION REPORT

17 ID.2014.R.003.1

3.3.2 HYDROLOGICAL DATA

Hydrological and meteorological data was requested, but only meteorological data was collected. At the

moment, data from stations registered to the WMO was downloaded and the Rainfall Atlas of Indonesia

was provided.

Data collected still needs treatments and quality studies. So far, the missing and faulty data of WMO

registered stations was obtained2. An example of the output obtained for some stations is presented in

Figure 3.7 where the number of daily data per month missing was obtained.

Figure 3.7 - Faulty daily data per month in station Sabang/Cut Bau and Palembang/St. M. Ba.

2 The NOAA data was requested. The data for the inception report was obtained from a non-official link, therefore the data needs to be confirmed.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

1958 3 3 1 2 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1962 31 28 31 30 14 30 31 31 30 19 14 14

1959 13 8 5 3 6 2 14 7 9 8 13 7 1963 15 15 19 9 26 23 21 28 24 28 25 28

1960 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 1 1964 29 26 25 22 26 27 28 30 26 26 18 28

1961 0 0 1 1 3 4 0 0 30 31 0 0 1965 29 19 19 20 22 21 27 24 19 31 28 31

1962 1 0 3 1 1 4 2 29 30 31 30 31 1966 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31

1963 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1967 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31

1964 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1968 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31

1965 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1969 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31

1966 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1970 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31

1967 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1971 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31

1968 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1972 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31

1969 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1973 18 13 21 14 19 8 16 7 6 2 13 17

1970 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1974 11 11 6 8 3 3 9 11 5 4 1 3

1971 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1975 15 10 15 13 8 7 12 6 13 13 14 17

1972 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1976 17 11 13 8 5 1 5 8 2 3 2 7

1973 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1977 3 4 3 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 1

1974 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1978 3 4 3 3 2 3 6 2 2 2 7 3

1975 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1979 1 1 0 0 1 7 3 0 0 1 0 2

1976 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1980 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 2 5 1 4

1977 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 25 18 23 19 1981 5 0 1 5 4 1 5 8 3 3 5 0

1978 12 11 22 25 23 18 23 10 16 9 11 14 1982 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 0 1 4 3 1

1979 9 3 7 19 31 23 17 14 5 10 27 26 1983 2 0 1 9 2 3 1 4 1 4 0 2

1980 14 16 10 13 23 30 31 30 25 21 13 21 1984 8 7 1 2 3 1 1 2 9 5 5 7

1981 23 19 28 25 25 18 25 25 24 27 30 29 1985 2 2 6 21 15 10 11 1 4 3 4 8

1982 26 21 17 15 24 13 16 9 7 14 5 4 1986 5 12 12 3 20 18 11 8 8 2 4 13

1983 5 4 2 13 4 8 2 6 6 12 2 3 1987 22 21 15 13 15 6 15 12 12 5 8 10

1984 13 21 17 3 3 2 6 0 8 7 3 5 1988 6 10 11 6 4 3 2 6 0 7 5 0

1985 10 1 10 21 2 14 8 3 2 3 2 2 1989 1 7 5 15 17 9 5 17 3 17 20 21

1986 3 7 5 4 9 3 4 1 3 0 4 4 1990 24 10 18 25 28 20 16 22 30 28 23 25

1987 11 4 6 3 8 7 14 11 6 6 7 4 1991 26 23 24 30 31 30 31 27 25 22 28 22

1988 11 17 7 1 2 4 2 5 10 7 8 8 1992 28 23 21 28 31 24 22 24 16 5 5 13

1989 2 12 15 26 16 8 14 21 19 20 21 27 1993 13 0 0 0 3 5 3 0 6 9 5 2

1990 20 23 29 30 26 21 17 26 30 29 25 27 1994 1 2 4 3 1 5 7 0 3 0 0 6

1991 29 24 31 30 29 30 31 31 27 30 28 31 1995 1 0 8 4 0 2 4 1 1 0 1 13

1992 31 28 31 29 29 29 31 30 23 11 1 4 1996 24 21 0 5 1 2 4 6 0 1 1 15

1993 14 6 15 6 4 3 11 5 5 7 5 1 1997 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 7 11

1994 1 0 10 1 3 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 7 0 9 3

1995 0 0 9 9 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 0 1999 18 10 16 6 6 4 9 5 7 0 0 3

1996 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 2 3 7 3 0 2000 4 2 3 3 1 3 1 4 6 27 2 4

1997 1 0 2 0 5 1 0 3 1 2 0 3 2001 8 14 14 8 8 18 1 6 7 5 7 2

1998 3 1 3 0 3 0 6 6 2 1 6 10 2002 2 3 0 5 3 5 3 1 0 5 2 2

1999 14 8 10 9 9 7 21 24 14 22 16 25 2003 1 2 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1

2000 21 16 17 11 3 11 7 4 6 3 3 4 2004 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

2001 2 3 0 0 9 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2005 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 3 4 1

2002 2 2 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 13 0 1 2006 1 0 2 5 2 4 1 0 0 1 0 2

2003 2 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 0 2007 3 1 3 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 0

2004 9 2 3 11 5 5 5 0 7 0 2 1 2008 4 2 6 6 2 3 2 7 0 0 2 3

2005 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 9 5 5 2009 8 4 5 0 3 3 1 0 0 3 2 3

2006 6 2 3 2 2 1 1 6 4 2 6 3

2007 0 2 3 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1

2008 1 3 3 4 1 2 2 4 1 8 3 3

2009 2 5 3 0 3 3 1 3 5 0 6 1


INCEPTION REPORT

18 ID.2014.R.003.1

As it can be seen from Figure 3.7, all the years show faulty data and that can compromise the accurate

development of any hydrological study. Likewise, during some inception meetings it was stated that

obtaining the ground meteo-climate data in Indonesia is very difficult because only a few stations are in

electronic files and most of them are in hard copies and in handwriting3.

In the event that no further meteorological data is available for the development of the study, the use of

global data sources is proposed, such as the WorldClim project, the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission

or the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. These global data sources allow an estimation of the rainfall and

temperature, but it is advisable to have at least some good quality ground stations to assess the global

data sources level of accuracy. As an example, Figure 3.8 and Figure 3.9 present the mean annual rainfall

and temperature for Indonesia, obtained from data of WorldClim.

3 The CONSULTANT’s own previous experience via IHC confirms the difficulty in assessing hydrological data.


INCEPTION REPORT

19 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 3.8 - Mean annual rainfall in Indonesia (WorldClim data, CONSULTANT processing).


INCEPTION REPORT

20 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 3.9 – Mean annual temperature in Indonesia (WorldClim data, CONSULTANT processing).

3.3.3 FOREST AREAS

The forest areas (Kawasan Hutan), shown in Figure 3.10, were obtained from the database of the

Ministry of Forestry (MoFo), in the WebGIS Forestry site (http://webgis.dephut.go.id/), and with a

proposed reclassification to be used in the scope of this project as shown in Table 3.5.

Table 3.5 - Reclassification of the forest areas from the MoFo.

Source Shape Source Classification Reclassification

Kawasan Hutan KSA-KPA, TB Conservation Forest

KSA-KPA Laut

Hutan Lindung Protection Forest

Hutan Produksi Production Forest

Hutan Produksi Terbatas

Hutan Produksi yang dapat dikonversi

Areal Penggunaan Lain Non-Forest Area

http://webgis.dephut.go.id/


INCEPTION REPORT

21 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 3.10 - Forest areas (MoFo data, CONSULTANT processing).

This reclassification (Table 3.5) allows a better understanding of the expected difficulties in development

activities from the natural environmental point of view. While for the non-forest areas no difficulties are

expected, for the conservation forest areas other exploration than forestry production is forbidden,

being the most restricted area. For the other type of forest areas some difficulties are expected,

especially in the protection forest, in spite there is no significant difference between the production

forest and the protection forest in terms of forest importance in the related regulation.

As mentioned before, the forest areas shape can be downloaded from the WebGIS Forestry, but only in

a WMS format. For the purpose of this project, spatial operations with this type of data will be essential,

but can only be performed with layers in vector format. For that reason, the provision of this shape in

vector format from the MoFo is essential in order to obtain the best results possible.

The alternative information is a file in Key Markup Language (kml) available in the mentioned website.

The scale of this information is less detailed and will lead to errors in the forestry classification.


INCEPTION REPORT

22 ID.2014.R.003.1

3.3.4 PROTECTED AREAS

The protected areas are one of the most important factors in the assessment of a potential site for a

hydropower plant. The environmental impact can be a decisive factor and should be first evaluated on a

desktop level to avoid any possible conflicts. This information should be from official source to

guarantee its authenticity.

Alternative information is available in the World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA) and is presented

in Figure 3.11. The WDPA is a joint venture between the United Nations Environment Programme World

Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP – WCMC) and the International Union for Conservation of

Nature – World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN – WCPA). It is the largest database both on

terrestrial and marine protected areas, collected from the international convention secretariats,

governments and NGO’s.

Figure 3.11 - Protected areas (WPDA data, CONSULTANT processing).


INCEPTION REPORT

23 ID.2014.R.003.1

3.3.5 LAND COVER

The MoFo has a public land cover file, based on the Landsat 2000 (the same base of Globcover2000),

presented in Figure 3.12.

Figure 3.12 - Land Cover (MoFo data, CONSULTANT processing).

The GlobCover was released in a more recent land cover version in 2010, and is presented in Figure 3.13.

Considering that the detail and scale of the source information are the same as the official source and

that GlobCover is more recent and updated, the latter is proposed to be adopted in the project.


INCEPTION REPORT

24 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 3.13 – Land Cover (GlobCover 2010 data, GESTO processing).

3.3.6 LAND PROPERTY

Land property is one of the issues that the CONSULTANT shall evaluate along the project, trying to

better understand how to grant/own land for the implementation of hydropower plants and how the

ownership of land may impact on project delays or its feasibility.

For this sake, the mapping of different types of ownership or concession of land would be useful, though

the CONSULTANT is not aware if such information is available.

3.3.7 ROAD AND RAILROAD NETWORK

The road and railroad network were obtained from the Vector Map (VMAP), a vector-based collection of

Geographic Information System (GIS) data about Earth at various levels of detail. For the current

purpose the level used was level 0 (low resolution), which has global coverage at public domain.


INCEPTION REPORT

25 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 3.14 - Road and rails network (VMAP data, CONSULTANT processing).

3.3.8 MORPHOLOGICAL DATA

Contour data, as well as river and streams, may be derived from a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Since

the scope of work is small hydropower, the DEM resolution should be as refined as possible, especially

in the focus regions of Sulawesi, NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara.

During the Inception Mission, it was mentioned that PLN currently possesses BIG data in the regions

inside the scope of work of the parallel contract on Geospatial Electrification Planning. However, it was

not possible to assess the type of information and scale.


INCEPTION REPORT

26 ID.2014.R.003.1

The CONSULTANT strongly advises PLN regarding the acquisition of this type of data to be included in

the database. The alternative datasets for this purpose are the global digital elevation dataset provided

by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), presented in Figure 3.15, the Advanced Spaceborne

Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer4 (ASTER).

Figure 3.15 - Digital global elevation data (SRTM data, CONSULTANT processing).

The comparison between these alternative datasets is presented in Table 3.6.

4 ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA.


INCEPTION REPORT

27 ID.2014.R.003.1

Table 3.6 - Comparison between alternative DEM datasets.

ASTERGDEM SRTM

Data source ASTER Space shuttle radar

Generation and distribution

METI/NASA NASA/USGS

Release year V1

~2011 V2 ~2003 V1

~2007 V4.1

Data acquisition period

2000 ~ ongoing 11 days (in 2000)

DEM resolution 30m 90m

DEM accuracy (stdev.)

7~14m 10m

DEM coverage 83 degrees north ~ 83 degrees

south 60 degrees north ~ 56 degrees

south

Area of missing data

Areas with no ASTER data due to constant cloud cover (supplied by other DEM)

Topographically steep area (due to radar characteristics)

The main problem with the use of big scale DEMs for SHP assessment may be summarized in two issues:

1) The larger the pixel, the worst the costs and hydraulic head estimation;

2) The stream network derived from flow accumulation procedures will present some deviations,

sometimes getting the wrong path. This is more prone in big scales.

Nevertheless, from the hydropower experience in the territory it is known that the mean error of SRTM

and ASTER is usually less than 5%, with an impact in in the range of 1-2% in the watershed calculation.

3.3.9 ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES

The administrative boundaries are crucial to extract location information for the projects and to

correctly identify the local entities to be consulted. This information should be officially provided. If this

is not the case, the GADM database of Global Administrative Areas (version 2.0, January 2012) may be

used. The available administrative divisions for Indonesia are: country, provinces and Regencies/Cities.


INCEPTION REPORT

28 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 3.16 - Administrative divisions, regency and city level (GADM data, GESTO processing).

3.3.10 SETTLEMENTS AND POPULATION

The settlements and population information are being analyzed and processed in the parallel contract

for Geospatial Electrification Planning. This information of population, respective loads, grid and mini-

grids aggregation is crucial for the first design approach for the capacity of the hydropower project.

The hydropower project levelized cost of electricity is strongly dependent on its capacity. For the same

site, all the capacities below the optimum balance between capacity and resource will result in higher

generation costs. Nevertheless, the capacity is sometimes limited not by resource but by demand load

side. For this reason, the population, expected loads (as the forecasts in the parallel contract) and the

aggregated load are crucial information for the adaptation of the hydropower potential to the grid and

population needs.

For this sake, express written authorization should be provided in order to request this information to

the consultants performing the parallel contract (Earth Institute).


INCEPTION REPORT

29 ID.2014.R.003.1

At this stage, available data was collected from the global data sources:

Vector Map Level 0 (VMAP0)

Geonet names server (GNS)

An example of the information obtained from the GNS is displayed in the figure below, where the

settlements of the Manggarrai regency of NTT region are geo-referenced.

Figure 3.17 - Settlements in Manggarai regency, NTT (GNS data, GESTO analysis).

It should be noted that this information is not official and population is not available. It is therefore

crucial that the information from the parallel contract is provided.


INCEPTION REPORT

30 ID.2014.R.003.1

3.3.11 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS

Topographic maps display most of the natural and man-made elements in the country, and can be

obtained from the BIG database. In the vector database, the information is divided into 7 themes:

Theme 1: Land Cover: land cover areas such as forests, fields and settlements;

Theme 2: Hydrography: include water elements such as rivers, lakes and coastlines;

Theme 3: Topography: high-level data such as contours;

Theme 4: Building: buildings, houses and office buildings;

Theme 5: Transportation and Utilities: roads, railways, transmission wires and bridges;

Theme 6: Administrative divisions: the state border, provinces, regencies/cities, townships and

villages;

Theme 7: Toponyms: geographic names such as the island's name, the name of the strait and the

name of the mountain.

There’s also cartograms, by regions, with the data availability and the year of manufacture by map scale

1:250 000, 1:50 000, 1:25 000 and 1:10 000, presented in Figure 3.18.

Figure 3.18 - BIG Cartograms by region.


INCEPTION REPORT

31 ID.2014.R.003.1

The CONSULTANT considers that the results of this project are very dependent on the availability of this

information, requesting that all data under PLN should be provided.

All maps will be important for this project, but taking into account the cost/benefit of this information,

the CONSULTANT considers that at least the topographic maps at the 1:250 000 scale should be part of

the database, in raster format if possible.

In terms of vector layers, all the data is of great interest to the project and to compose a full database

for the future. In terms of strict requirements for the analysis to be performed, the information is just

mandatory for the regions of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi, namely the Theme 2 and 3, for

the lower available scales at the locations where hydropower projects were identified, along with the

topographic map in raster format.

Raster formats are not stated in the BIG product list, but it is usually a standard. It may also be obtained

from the geo-referencing of the print version of the topographical maps after high quality scanning.


INCEPTION REPORT

32 ID.2014.R.003.1

4 THE SMALL HYDROPOWER IN INDONESIA AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL PLANNING

In this chapter we propose the methodology to be followed in the project Small Hydropower in Indonesia

and Improved Geospatial Planning. The legal framework and the identified stakeholders allow a better

understanding of the scope of the project, shaping the originally proposed methodology for improved

results. For the challenges identified during the Inception Mission, changes to the preliminary

methodology are proposed, resulting in the final methodology proposal, milestones and schedule.

4.1 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK

4.1.1 ELECTRICITY SECTOR

The Electricity sector is regulated by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (“MoEMR”) and its

sub-agencies – The Directorate of General Electricity and Energy Utilization and the Directorate General

of Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation.

According to the Electricity Law No. 30/2009, electricity development shall aim to guarantee the

availability of power at adequate quantity, good quality, and reasonable price to improve public welfare

and prosperity in a just and distributive manner as well as to realize sustainable development.

Energy policy objectives are based on the Presidential Decree No. 5 of 2006 on National Energy Policy

(Kebijakan Energi Nasional – KEN) and its Blueprint of National Energy Management 2005-2025

(Pengelolaan Energi Nasional – PEN).

The 2005-2025 National Energy Blueprint specifies 500 MW on grid and 330 MW off grid targets for

small scale hydropower energy production.

The MoEMR is responsible for developing the electricity master plan (RUKN – Rencana Umum

Ketenagalistrikan Nasional) which sets out, amongst other things, a ten year estimate of the power

demand and supply, the investment and funding policy, and the approach to the utilization of new and

renewable energy resources. RUKN is reviewed annually and is the source for the Electrification

Development Program (RUPTL – Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik) and Regional General Plan

of Electricity (RUKD – Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Daerah). The current RUKN is for the period

2012-2031.

The Electrification Development Program (RUPTL) constitutes the official ten year power development

plan prepared by PLN, approved by MoEMR. The RUPTL contains demand forecasts, future expansion

plans, energy production, and fuel requirements and indicated which projects will be developed by PLN

and IPP investors. As RUKN, RUPTL is also reviewed annually. The current RUPLT is for the decade 2013-

2022.


INCEPTION REPORT

33 ID.2014.R.003.1

The key figures from RUPTL regarding Small Hydropower in Indonesia are summarized in Table 4.1, the

list of the hydropower projects present in the document are in Annex IV and V.

Table 4.1 - Summary of hydro potential.

(Unit: MW)

Region Existing hydro capacity 2013

Hydro projects in RUPTL

Hydro Capacity as of 2022

Jawa-Bali 2536 2698 5234

Kalimantan 32 248 280

Maluku 0 96 96

Maluku Utara 0 5 5

NTB 0 51 51

NTT 0 31 31

Papua 0 106 106

Papua Barat 0 64 64

Sulawesi 361 1431 1792

Sumatera 1139 2014 3153

Total 4068 6744 10812

From analyzing the RUPTL, one may conclude that for the next 10 years a small hydropower

development of 710.6 MW is expected. The total distribution of this development per region is

presented in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 - Small Hydro Projects Plan for 2013-2022 (RUPTL).

Region SHP Capacity (MW)

Jawa-Bali 352.1

Sumatera 168.0

Sulawesi 53.1

Kalimantan 0.0

NTB 6.9

Papua 36.1

NTT 30.9

Maluku 41.5

Papua Barat 17.1

Maluku Utara 5.0

Total 710.6

The bidding process for new capacity is generally on a competitive basis, in line with the private sector

participation according to Perpres No. 67/2005 and amended by Perpres No. 13/2010. However, for the

renewable energy projects, Direct Appointment is a common practice in the sector. The process usually

undertaken for small hydro IPP direct appointment method is presented in Figure 4.1.


INCEPTION REPORT

34 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 4.1 – Flowchart for direct appointment method for Small Hydropower.

PROPOSAL

- KKO , KKF, AR

- PRE QUALIFICATION

REQUEST PUBLIC

ELECTRICITY PROVIDER

PERMIT (IUPTL) TEMPORARY

DIRECT APPOINTMENT PERMIT

PROPOSAL

DIRECT APPOINTMENT

PERMIT

A

DIRECT APPOINTMENT METHODPLTM IPP ≤ 10 MW

DEVELOPERPLN

REGIONMESDM(MEMR)

PLN PUSATDIV EBT

SEND TO PLN REGION

DIRECT APPOINTMENT PERMIT

PROPOSAL

DATA EVALUATION

DIRECT APPOINTMENT

PUBLIC ELECTRICITY

PROVIDER PERMIT (IUPTL)

TEMPORARY

A

Yes

No

FIT

04 / 2012

PRICE EVALUATION

PICE PROPOSAL PRICE APPROVAL

SENT TO PLN REGION

GM AUTHORITY BOD PRINCIPAL PERMITNo

Yes

PPA

FC

COMMERCIAL OPERTION DATE

(COD)

REQUEST PUBLIC ELECTRICITY

PROVIDER PERMIT (IUPTL)

PRICE ESTIMATION

NEGOTIATION

PRICE PROPOSAL


INCEPTION REPORT

35 ID.2014.R.003.1

The developer submits its proposal to the PLN region office for Pre-qualification with its operational and

financial feasibility study and risk assessment. The PLN region sends the direct appointment permit

proposal to the PLN central office (PLN Pusat), whom through Div-EBT makes a data evaluation and

forwards the direct appointment permit proposal to the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources for

his approval.

If direct appointment permit is approved, the PLN region starts the process of Price Evaluation.

Currently the small hydropower may benefit from the feed-in tariff. In that case, the process avoids the

price negotiation and runs directly to approval, from the region or the Board of Directors, depending on

the amount of investment.

Ministerial Regulation No 04/2012 on Electricity Purchase from Small and Medium Scale Renewable

Energy and Excess Power introduces new differentiated feed-in tariff levels in Indonesia. Tariff levels are

differentiated depending on the installation type, its location and voltage of grid interconnection. The

feed in tariffs were recently updated by the Ministerial Regulation No 12/2014. Tariffs are presented in

Table 4.35 and valid for the PPA during a period of 20 years after the commercial operation date.

Table 4.3 - Feed-in tariff levels.

Voltage Wilayah Territorial Factor

(F)

Feed-in tariff level in Rp/kWh

Year 1 to 8 Year 9 to 20

Medium (Up to 10 MW)

Java, Bali, and Madura 1.00

1075 x F 750 x F

Sumatra 1.10

Borneo and Sulawesi 1.20

West Nusa Tenggara and East Nusa Tenggara 1.25

Maluku and North Maluku 1.30

Papua and West Papua 1.60

Low (Up to 250 kW)

Java, Bali, and Madura 1.00

1270 x F 770 x F

Sumatra 1.10

Borneo and Sulawesi 1.20

West Nusa Tenggara and East Nusa Tenggara 1.25

Maluku and North Maluku 1.30

Papua and West Papua 1.60

5 During the preparation of this report, feed-in tariff increase were reported for small hydro. The notices pointed to a raise up to 1075 Rp/kWh. This information needs to be confirmed.


INCEPTION REPORT

36 ID.2014.R.003.1

After the financial close of the PPA, the developer must request an Electricity Business License (IUPTL ---

Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik). A business license must be granted before an entity can supply

electrical power or run an electrical power-supporting business. In this sense, a business license to

supply electricity for public use is required. The IUPTL must be required by the IPP and it is issued by the

Central Government, in the case the IPP intends to sell power to PLN (already an owner of an IUPTL).

4.1.2 OTHER REQUIRED LICENSES

Apart from the licenses and requirements from the electric sector, the additional required licenses for

the small hydropower development in Indonesia are long. From the meetings held during the Inception

Mission, it was mentioned that all the required processes, the different length, agencies, the different

concessional durations are considered obstacles to hydropower development.

The list of the identified official licenses is presented in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4 – Other required licenses.

Required Licenses

Prinsip Pemakain Sumber Daya Air Water resources use license

Izin Pemanfaatan Air Permukaan (SIPAP) Surface water use license

Izin Mendirikan Bangunan (IMB) Building construction permit

Izin Pelaksanaan Konstruksi Construction implementation license (other than IMB) on the river is required.

Izin Gangguan (HO) Disturbance permit

Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan (UKL) Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan (UPL)

Environmental licenses

Angka Pengenal Importir Importer identification number

Izin Pemakaian Kawasan Hutan Forest Permit

Izin Lokasi Local permit

The Building construction permits, Disturbance permit, Water resources use licenses and the importer

identification number were never mentioned in the meetings, therefore, it may be assumed that the

local permit, environmental and forest licenses are the most critical licensing processes, and are best

described in the following subchapters.

4.1.3 LOCAL PERMIT

The process of establishing a SHP begins properly with the request for a Local Permit (Izin Lokasi). This

permit grants an applicant the option to develop a SHP within a given area, subject to time constraints

and other conditions. The process is regulated by State Land Agency Decree 2 of 1999 and more recently

by Government Regulation 15/2010 concerning the implementation of spatial planning.


INCEPTION REPORT

37 ID.2014.R.003.1

An application for a Local Permit is made to the local government by proposing the target area and

outlining a development plan.

The term of a Local Permit is limited by the target area in question: areas of up to 25 ha are given a

one-year permit; areas between 25 and 50 ha are given a two-year permit; areas over 50 ha are given

three-year permits. Within this time the company must obtain tenure over a minimum of 51% of the

target area. If land acquisition has reached more than 51% of the area of then an extension may be

granted for a further one year. If land acquisition of at least 50% cannot be completed within the time,

the land can be released to another company or reduced and the remainder made available to other

companies.

The Local Permit process has no direct legal obligation to consider environmental impact, as that is

covered by the processes of forest conversion and management activities. As Local Permit is simply an

option on an area of land, there is also little indirect interaction with environmental legislation.

4.1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

On February 23, 2012, the Government of Indonesia issued Government Regulation No. 27 of 2012 regarding Environmental Permits (“GR 27/2012”).

GR 27/2012 is an implementing regulation of the recent 2009 Environmental Law (Law No. 32 of 2009) and revokes Government Regulation No. 27 of 1999 (“GR 27/1999”) which previously regulated two types of environmental reporting and compliance for companies operating in Indonesia: an Environmental Impact Analysis Report (“AMDAL”) and an Environmental Management/Monitoring Efforts Report (“UKL – UPL”).

The aim of GR 27/2012 is to provide greater legal certainty for businesses in terms of environmental licensing while ensuring the protection and management of the natural environment.

The key requirement of the new regulation is the Environmental Permit. The idea for an Environmental Permit was initially introduced by the 2009 Environmental Law but has not been implemented until now. In brief, any business which currently requires either an AMDAL or an UKL-UPL now also requires an Environmental Permit.

The environmental permit is also a requirement for obtaining a business permit. In the event the Environmental Permit is revoked, the business permit will also be cancelled.

Under GR 27/2012, companies must still apply for and receive approval of an AMDAL or UKL – UPL. As an additional requirement, companies must now also apply for an Environmental Permit. Both the Environmental Permit and approval of an AMDAL or UKL – UPL will be issued on the same day.

An Environmental Permit shall report the requirements and obligations which have been stated in the approval of the AMDAL or UKL – UPL. Additional requirements may be added as stipulated by the issuing authority (e.g. Minister of Environmental Affairs, Governors, or Regents/Mayors).

http://blog.ssek.com/index.php/2012/01/2011-indonesian-law-review-environmental-protection-management/


INCEPTION REPORT

38 ID.2014.R.003.1

The type of business plans and/or activities that must have an AMDAL are indicated in State Ministry of Environment Regulation No.11/2006. Table 4.5 presents those related with electricity and energy utilization.

Table 4.5 - Electricity and energy utilization activities needed to conduct an AMDAL.

NO ACTIVITY SCALE

1 Construction of the transmission network > 150 kV

2 Development ≥ 100 MW

a. PLTD / Gas Power Plant / Power Plant / Combined Cycle Power Plant

(in one location)

b. Development PLTP (geothermal development) ≥ 55 MW

c. Hydroelectric Development by:

- High dam, or ≥ 15 m

- Areas of inundation, or ≥ 200 ha

- Installed capacity ≥ 50 MW

d. Construction of power plants from other species (such as: OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conservation), Solar, Wind, Biomass, Peat, etc.).

≥ 10 MW

In terms of small hydropower (under 10 MW), the developments under 15 m and with inundation reservoir area under 200 ha will not need to conduct AMDAL. This will allow to effectively speed-up the implementation of the SHP projects, as the procedures for AMDAL can be very time consuming. Figure 4.2 describes the AMDAL procedures based on the GR 27/2012.

According to the State Ministry of Environment Decree No.8/2006 the necessary documents for the

AMDAL are:

1) Terms of References Framework for Environmental Impact Analysis (KA-ANDAL)

KA-ANDAL is prepared for framing the scope and depth of Environmental Impact Analysis (ANDAL).

2) Environmental Impact Analysis (ANDAL)

ANDAL describes expected significant environmental impacts, evaluation of the impacts including selection of alternative and preparation of appropriate environmental mitigation measures in terms of implementation of the proposed project.

3) Environmental Management Plan (RKL)

RKL statements environmental management approaches for mitigating environmental negative impacts forecasted in ANDAL.

4) Environmental Monitoring Plan (RPL)

RPL examines the effectiveness of proposed environmental management plan.


INCEPTION REPORT

39 ID.2014.R.003.1

Figure 4.2 - Scheme of the AMDAL procedures.


INCEPTION REPORT

40 ID.2014.R.003.1

The AMDAL committee is established to review the AK-ANDAL, ANDAL, RKL and RPL for the proposed project. The Committee will be established by approval authorities such as Minister of Environment, Governor and Mayer decided depending on the size of the proposed project. According to GR 27/2012, the AMDAL committee consists of following members.

Representative from environmental institution;

Representative from technical institution;

Expert in the kind of effort and/or activity studied;

Expert in the impacts that may occur from effort and/or activity studied;

Representative from community to be effected by the impact; and

Representative from Non-Governmental Environmental Organization.

The AMDAL committee is also classified into the central, provincial and district depending on the category and size of the proposed project. The State Ministry of Environment Decree No.5/2008 indicates the responsible AMDAL committee for each category and/or size of the proposed project as follows:

Central AMDAL Committee: assess business and / or activities located in more than one area of the province; in the territory dispute with another country;

Provincial AMDAL Committee: assess business and / or activities located in more than one district / city and/or in cross-district / city; and

District AMDAL Committee: assess business and / or activities located in single district.

An environmental management efforts and environment monitoring efforts (UKL-UPL) is required for

projects or activities smaller than those requiring an AMDAL. In principle, the AMDAL is a study of the

potential significant impact of the proposed business activity on the environment, while the UKL-UPL

covers monitoring and management efforts undertaken for business activities which are not likely to

have significant impact on the environment.

Unlike AMDAL, a UKL-UPL is not a formal certificate, and does not include conditions requiring the

applicant to mitigate impacts – it simply requires that a narrower list of environmental impacts be

considered in the decision making process.

4.1.5 FORESTRY ADMINISTRATION

Forests in Indonesia are classified into three major types depending on the functions and objectives, as

production forest (Hutan Produksi), protection forest (Hutan Lindung) and conservation forest (Hutan

Konservasi) according to the Article 6 in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 1999. Production

forest is defined as the forest area where production of forest products is sought for. Protection forest is

the forest area having the main function to sustain water resources, to prevent flood, erosion, water

intrusion and to maintain land fertility. Conservation forest is the forest area which the principle

function is to conserve bio-diversity and ecosystem.

The Utilization of forest area by development activities beside forestry production is only allowed in

production forests and protection forests in accordance with the Article 38 in the Law of the Republic of


INCEPTION REPORT

41 ID.2014.R.003.1

Indonesia No. 41 of 1999. Therefore, it’s not allowed to explore conservation forests for other purpose

than forestry production. The additional development activities possible beside forestry production are

defined in the Republic of Indonesia’s Forestry Minister Regulation No.16 of 2014, and listed in the

following table.

Table 4.6 - Utilization of forest areas by development activities beside forestry production, P.16/Menhut-II/2014.

Forest Classification Development activities

Production Forest

(Hutan Produksi）

Protected Forest

(Hutan Lindung）

Religious places of worship, cemeteries and spiritual tourist places;

Mining including means and infra-structures of oil, gas, minerals, coal and geothermal;

generation, transmission, and electrical distribution installation, as well as new and renewable energy technologies;

Development of telecommunication networks, radio transmission stations, and television relay stations;

Public roads, highways, and railways;

transportation uncategorized as public transport for manufacturing products transportation;

water resources facilities and infrastructures, development of water installation networks, and clean water and/or waste water channeling;

public facilities;

forestry related industries;

defense and security;

infrastructure supporting public safety;

temporary shelter places for natural disaster victims;

Agriculture for food security; or

Agriculture for energy security.

4.2 IDENTIFIED STAKEHOLDERS

During the Inception Mission the following major stakeholders for the development of SHP in Indonesia

were identified:

PLN

Commercial financing institutions

Cooperation Agencies

Engineering Consultants

Independent Power Producers (IPP)

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources

Ministry of Public Works

Ministry of Forestry

Ministry of Environment

Local governments


INCEPTION REPORT

42 ID.2014.R.003.1

PLN is responsible for the majority of Indonesia’s electricity generation and has the exclusive powers in

relation to transmission, distribution and supply of electricity to the public. PLN is regulated and

supervised by the MoEMR, the Ministry of State Owned Enterprise, being a State-owned limited Liability

Company (or Persero). PLN is a major player as the single off-taker of hydropower electricity production

in Indonesia.

The economic feasibility of the project is just assessed by the IPP’s and financing institutions, either

commercial or cooperation agencies. This is one of the focal problems mentioned by several parts in

meetings during the Inception Mission as the delaying factor in hydropower development in Indonesia.

The definition of the projects by the IPP’s at the PPA negotiation phase is usually scarce, leading to

obstacles in project financing and consequent difficulties in the financial close. In this process,

engineering consultants should play a major role and push IPP’s towards the best practices in the project

feasibility standards in order to the request of PPA’s.

The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources has created the environment for the development of SHP

in Indonesia, but several licenses and permits that are bottlenecks for hydropower development depend

on external entities, namely the local governments, Ministry of Forestry, Ministry of Environment and

Ministry of Public Works.

4.3 IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES

The first main challenge identified at the Inception Mission regarding the project execution was the

CONSULTANT’s access to crucial requested information and to some of the major stakeholders (namely,

relevant public institutions).

In order to overcome this challenge, the CONSULTANT proposed a MoU (Annex VI) for data provision

with PLN, as the critical data for the project is currently at this institution’s possession, more specifically:

The MapInfo database from the JICA’s studies (from 1999);

The spreadsheet of IPP requests (PLN Pusat);

Access to the IPP feasibility studies in order to retrieve additional information;

Contact IPPs in order to request further information to complete the database;

The 20kV and above grid (shapefile, kml, AutoCAD formats), including lines and substations.

The CONSULTANT became aware that sharing the Mapinfo database and the spreadsheet of IPP

requests is the most concerning issue for PLN. Nonetheless, these would provide extremely useful

information for the project, namely the list of potential hydropower sites and hydrological data.

The CONSULTANT understands that the list of potential hydropower sites is sensitive and confidential

information, as it could be used by third parties and shut PLN out of project development, as it has

happened in the recent past. However, its use within this assignment might concisely protect PLN’s

interests if it is integrated in the database and the tool to be developed, allowing PLN to easily identify


INCEPTION REPORT

43 ID.2014.R.003.1

the IPP requests that are in conflict with PLN’s plans on hydropower. If this would be the case, PLN’s

mandatory technical review of the project (according to MR No. 12/2014, Article 7, point 2), should be

negative and the PPA request won’t proceed. The CONSULTANT fully understands PLN’s concerns and is

willing to grant confidentiality to the data provided, but most of all, believes that the tool to be

developed will in fact provide PLN a way to protect their plans and efforts.

If the aforementioned info is not provided to the CONSULTANT, the task may still be performed and

even the said evaluation of conflicts may be possible in the tool to be developed, assuming some losses

on the level of detail of the hydropower projects. The CONSULTANT then proposes to digitize the

information available on the last assessment of the large hydropower potential (JICA 2011). The lack of

hydrological data may be overcome by the use of global datasets, as explained in 3.3.2 - Hydrological

data.

On another level, the spreadsheet of IPP requests is the main data source to the development of this

project, given its main scope is to provide a tool to prioritize SHP and for that the list of projects to be

analyzed should be provided. If the list of IPP sites is provided, all tasks related to retrieving data and

requesting further information to IPP’s will be worked out with PLN staff as a hands-on-the-job training

approach. This will capacitate the staff in the future to request and retrieve the required information to

the database.

In the event that the list is not provided, the assessment of small hydropower potential to be performed

would either yield in the duplication of already performed work (with the additional challenge of

accessing other source information) or, alternatively, considerably change the scope of work and

timeframe of the current assignment. Given that the former would not be time nor cost effective, for

the latter the CONSULTANT proposes the greenfield mapping of the overall hydropower potential of the

region (conventional head vs flow approach) followed by the highest potential sites identification and

technical and economical assessment of the best projects that may, or may not, coincide with the ones

already being licensed.

Furthermore, and addressing what eventually seems to be root of the problem, the CONSULTANT would

like to highlight that opening the info of the tool to the general public is ultimately PLN and the WB’s

decision: the project could be performed as intended only for PLN’s internal access (or with different

levels of access defined by PLN for that matter – as presented in sub-section 4.4) and it would still be an

extremely valid planning/management tool.

In case PLN decides to withhold its hydro mapping data from the GIS database, the CONSULTANT

considers it would be a relevant downgrade on the quality and usefulness of the tool, given it is the

most significant hydro mapping data available.

Considering the 20 kV power lines, this info is required to assess the distance to the medium voltage

grid, as an important indicator for the project as long distances may compromise grid connected


INCEPTION REPORT

44 ID.2014.R.003.1

projects feasibility. The CONSULTANT would like to assess a cut-off distance to medium voltage grid

(substations) through the generalization of the analysis of several projects in the regions. The projects

for grid connection at low voltages are mainly indicated for isolated grids and, therefore, the lack of the

geo-referenced lines in the scope of this assignment will be overcome in the Geospatial Electrification

Planning parallel contract by the Earth Institute.

The second main challenge identified at the Inception Mission regarding the project execution in the

eastern regions (Sulawesi, NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara) and, most particularly, for the field visits to

the corresponding wilayahs, is that a visit plan should be closely defined with PLN Pusat, who should not

only officially inform local management of the upcoming assignments and thus grant easier access to

the required information, but also to request the assignment of local counterparts to accompany the

CONSULTANT members in meetings with the local authorities or any other relevant field work. The

CONSULTANT considers that until this bridge is created, any local initiative will be ineffective and with

limited chances of being successful.

Like mentioned before, this project will include the interaction with a parallel contract for Geospatial

Electrification Planning. As previously anticipated in the tender, some of the regions where the work will

be developed have already been subject of analysis by the parallel contract (NTT, Maluku and Maluku

Utara), but the Sulawesi group was not included in the scope of work and will be developed in the

parallel contract simultaneously to this assignment. Therefore, the coordination between tasks and the

collection of data in the Sulawesi region may suffer some delay compared to other regions.

Furthermore in the field of the Geospatial Electrification Planning parallel contract, it is worth

mentioning that an added challenge must be considered given the seemingly iterative and

interdependent process that will occur between both assignments, given that on one side a consultant

will be focused on the generation point of view, whilst on the other side another will be focused on the

demand perspective.

On a secondary level, it was found during the Inception Mission that one governmental initiative of the

MoEMR could benefit from this project, as PLN is currently given the mission to study, with the Ministry

of Public Works, the potential hydropower analysis of existing dams with currently non-hydropower

purposes. In this sense, the list of all the dams of the country and its characteristics would also be

required.

4.4 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PRELIMINARY METHODOLOGY

In the event that the MoU for data provision is accepted by PLN and all the requested information is

granted, the CONSULTANT does not foresee substantive changes to the preliminary methodology.

The opposite, however, may occur if the list of IPP requests is not provided. In that case, the

hydropower potential assessment and project identification needs to be performed prior to the project


INCEPTION REPORT

45 ID.2014.R.003.1

prioritization in order to form a list of projects (as mentioned in the previous sub-section), at least in the

regions of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi. As such, the decision not to share the list of IPP

requests with the CONSULTANT needs to be carefully weighted by the WB and PLN.

If PLN opts to not share the Mapinfo database, as some of these projects are already in the public

domain, the CONSULTANT believes that from the latest assessment (JICA 2011) the large hydropower

potential may be reconstituted into a database. The CONSULTANT will digitize the data into the

database (duplication of work not being avoided), assuming losses on the information level of detail.

Like mentioned in the previous sub-section, opening the info of the tool to the general public is

ultimately PLN’s judgment, considering that the project could be performed with different levels of

access or user restrictions defined by PLN for that matter and would still fulfil the project’s objective

and be an extremely valid planning/management tool. As shown in Figure 4.3, the GIS database could be

performed as originally intended, including all info and data considered sensitive or classified, but the

content open to public access could be customized as per PLN’s decision, ranging from total access (only

accessible to PLN – DivEBT, per instance) to restricted or no access (to the general public worldwide, per

instance). Any intermediate form of access may be arranged.

Figure 4.3 – The database’s level of access.

The current GIS capabilities within the end department (DivEBT) are quite limited. There is one database

with no editing procedures (or capacity within the institution) with the identification of the large dams

and some additional data that the CONSULTANT will try to incorporate on the future database on small

hydro. Therefore, the CONSULTANT will shape the database aiming to promote its usability, instead of

performance. A simple solution based on open source software is proposed.

Level of accessto be defined

General public

PLN - DivEBT

• PLN selected depts.

• PLN regional offices

• Registered IPPs and companies

• Registered individual users

• …


INCEPTION REPORT

46 ID.2014.R.003.1

The open source software we would advise to be adopted is Quantum GIS. The choice of software is also

supported by the parallel contract of Geospatial Electrification Planning by the Earth Institute, as they

are currently using the same software.

The training component of the project will also be adapted for this option rather than the proposed use

of ArcGIS platform, or advanced server solutions based on PostGIS. Instead of the proposed training to

occur in the end of the assignment, the CONSULTANT proposes to split the training components into

two parts. The first part is to take place right after the presentation workshop on Small Hydropower

Mapping and the second right after the Final Workshop.

By the time of the small hydropower workshop, the National Geographical Database for Small

hydropower shall be complete, therefore the capacity building in GIS should take place in order to PLN

be able to maintain and update with the new IPP requests.

4.5 FINAL METHODOLOGY PROPOSAL

Taking into account all the previous considerations, the final methodology proposal workflow is

presented in Figure 4.4, followed by a brief description of the tasks.

Figure 4.4 - Workflow with technical approach and final methodology.


INCEPTION REPORT

47 ID.2014.R.003.1

Data collection and production of national small hydro GIS database, review and validation of small

hydro potential for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

Inception (Tasks 1 to 5)

Concluded with the approval of the Inception Report and accordance to the final

methodology. With the approval of the report and to avoid delays in the execution of the

tasks, it is expected the signing of the MoU and the provision of the requested PLN data

(spreadsheet with the IPP requests, access to the feasibility studies if needed, the list of PLN

hydropower projects and the MapInfo with the potential hydropower).

Creating a GIS Database for National Information on SHP Development

6. – Comprehensive Compilation of Existing Info and Data

First, compilation of data will focus on PLN’s current database of project development, IPP

requests and the MapInfo database that is currently in use within the Div-EBT. This

information will be the base information for the GIS Database for National Information on

SHP development. The success of the project will be dependent on the provided information

by PLN. In that sense, a MoU was proposed and the CONSULTANT is waiting for PLN’s

feedback. The proposed MoU is presented in Annex VI. The alternative option for the

provision of the information is not readily available.

As previously mentioned, the lack of the MapInfo database may be overcome by digitizing

the information of the latest Master plan (JICA, 2011) and considering the use of global

datasets for hydrological data. However, this assignment focuses on the current list of small

hydropower projects PLN holds which, therefore, should be provided to the CONSULTANT,

since the available option implies duplication of work and requires a full resource study and

site identification in order to compose the list of potential sites.

Secondly, information for the characterization of the projects will be collected. This

information is particularly useful for the activity. The data collection for each project is

intended to be carried out by the CONSULTANT in PLN Pusat, whenever possible with the

PLN staff working with the licensing of Small Hydro Power. This will help the staff to

understand if there is missing information in the pre-feasibility and feasibility studies and

collect the required data to populate the database. On the other hand, the CONSULTANT will

be able to understand the required procedures to request additional information.

The datasets to be included are referred in the subchapter 0 -

.


INCEPTION REPORT

48 ID.2014.R.003.1

For last, some detailed data such as data from meteorological or hydrometric stations, typical

daily load curves would improve the review of the Small Hydropower in NTT, Maluku, Maluku

Utara and Sulawesi.

The preferred method for collecting data will be through PLN’s appointment.

Start: Following the approval of the Final Methodology, signing of the MoU and provision of

the PLN list of projects and potential

Duration of the task: 2 months

7. – Designing a GIS Database on SHP Development

A geographical information system (GIS) comprises hardware, software and data for

capturing, managing, analyzing and displaying geographically referenced information.

The main scope of this task is to design the structure of the data to be used in a geographical

information system and populate the database with the collected data. Therefore, the way

data is structured should take into account the hardware and software, as well as the current

GIS knowledge of the PLN division that will receive and work in the future with the database.

Following the Inception Mission it was possible to determine the lack of GIS knowledge

within the Div-EBT department. The easiness of use of the database will be the main purpose

of the adopted technology.

In data to be used in geographical information systems, a distinction should be made

between geographical data (location) and attribute data (characterization). The relationship

of a feature to other features is implied either from the location or the attributes.

Given the extent of the database, geographic coordinates will be preferred over a map

projection for the geographical storage of data. The coordinate systems to be adopted will be

WGS84 (World Geodetic System). Whenever distance, areas or volumes should be assessed,

the proper Universal Transversal Mercator (UTM) will be used to project the data.

The GIS database will be formulated in a shapefile format to allow interoperability, taking

into consideration the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool.

Start: the task may proceed after the provision of the list of projects, but it only can end after

all the data collection and digitizing



INCEPTION REPORT

49 ID.2014.R.003.1

8. – Creation of Maps of Findings in SHP Development in Indonesia

GIS layouts will be prepared for the creation of maps of finding in the SHP development in

Indonesia. The hydropower potential, the location of small hydropower projects, the possible

location conflicts between them are some of the possible Maps of Findings to be created.

The proper analysis of the collected and digitized data will determine the maps of findings to

be presented.

Start: the task may start after a preliminary version of the national database is produced


9. – Development of Proposal on Hosting and Operation of the GIS Database

The proposal on hosting and operation of the GIS database will focus on the hardware,

software and training required for the future maintenance and upgrade of the database.

Considering the easiness of use a primary goal, the required hardware may be already

available for use and the software may be an open source solution. Therefore, the proposal

will focus on the next steps and the possible upgrades of the database, considering the

advantages and disadvantages of alternative solutions that may be adopted in the future.

Start: the task is planned to align its end with the creation of maps of findings in order to

close the sub-activity Creating a GIS database for National Information on SHP Development

Duration of the task: 1 month

SHP Role and Potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

10. Review of SHP role

Following a review of the existing power generation and distribution situation in NTT,

Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi, the CONSULTANT will assess the possibility of the

medium and small isolated systems to be supplied by SHP solutions and corresponding

energy generation alternatives for backup or dry season, thus reviewing the SHP role in these

regions.

This activity is policy guidance related, but will need to be backed by an initial technical

approach. Here, the first relevant interaction with the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool

parallel contract (Earth Institute) will take place.


INCEPTION REPORT

50 ID.2014.R.003.1

First, the financial model will be worked together with PLN and the WB trying to make the

best common ground with the financial model assumed by the Earth Institute/Castalia in the

parallel contract. Two different approaches will be used:

Calculation of the IRR and NPV for the feed-in tariff and regional factor

LCOE of the projects

In the islands where the hydropower potential is low, the feed-in tariff may not be sufficient

to support the development of a project, but SHP may still be a viable option for

electrification comparing to the PV costs assumed in the parallel contract. In this sense, the

LCOE of the project will be determined, in order to feed the network planner model in a

second iteration.

Second, the demand load centers need to be determined for each new hydropower site.

Information assessed and developed by the Earth Institute (EI) will be formally requested, so

that the EI may disclose the information to the CONSULTANT. This information will include:

The population and load forecast for each settlement point;

The aggregated population and load forecast from the network planner results based

on PV;

The report with the assumptions used for each region/island.

From the population and demand, the optimization algorithm will work for three base design

scenarios:

Base 1 - Optimum design (simple minimization of LCOE of the project);

Base 2 - Optimum design for the aggregated demand in the nearby mini-grid, as

resulted from the work from the EI/Castalia;

Base 3 - Optimum design that meets the demand in the main grid in the region/island,

as resulted from the work from the EI/Castalia;

From the base design scenarios some conclusions may be taken about the grid connection

and the off-grid option, but in several cases both choices may be feasible.

Some of the inputs of the technical analysis will be derived from the current framework, like

the limits on the dam height to be considered, the ecological flow, the levelized cost of

electricity to be accepted for each region, either in off-grid or in grid connection, the service

level to be attained to the mini-grids, from which the demand will also derive, the option of

using diesel as backup, their sizing and costs. The CONSULTANT will also equate the use of

batteries with hydropower even though they are possibly incompatible with storage cycles,

given that the resource is not intermittent as wind or solar, but strongly seasonal.


INCEPTION REPORT

51 ID.2014.R.003.1

An adapted SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) for the different

scenarios will be developed in this step, considering local characteristics of the regions and

looking at environmental (e.g. height of the dam, reservoir area, etc.), social (e.g. population

who will benefit from the generation, number of jobs created, etc.), technical (e.g. grid

connection distance, rural demand may quickly overcome the hydropower potential) and

financial aspects (risk, financing possibilities, time to market).

As a conclusion, the usual upsides and downsides of using small hydro to supply power for

medium and small isolated systems that are based mainly on LV and MV lines and its

customization to the region’s case will be assessed and compared to other off-grid

technologies. From the CONSULTANT’s experience, one of the biggest disadvantages of SHP

is coping with seasonality of the resource, which may lead to diesel units as backup power.

The same evaluation will be performed for grid connected projects. The updated load

demand forecast (EI input) is mandatory as it will limit the potential to be sized to the

demand. The penetration of SHP in the system shall also be addressed in order to promote

grid stability, and for that sake, a regional benchmark study will be performed.

In the end, the main objective is to determine key figures of what may be the use of

hydropower, coping with the demand, environmental and social constraints. This will be

determined island by island, region by region, based on the identified potential by the

CONSULTANT and the estimated demand determined by the EI, and will define how

hydropower will promote rural electrification and grid expansion. The outcome of this task

will be the tentative ranges of capacity in each system, both in terms of off-grid and on-grid

power based on SHP.

Start: the task may start after a preliminary version of the national database is produced


11. Update of already identified potential for SHP development

The list of projects at this stage should be complemented and updated through visits to the

major wilayahs and compiling information on preliminary permits for hydropower at the local

governments. For this tour through the wilayahs, a visit plan will be worked closely with PLN

Pusat, who should assign at each location a local counterpart, not only for the PLN related

information, but also to accompany the CONSULTANT in the meetings with the local

authorities.

From the CONSULTANT’s behalf, the visits shall be conducted by a team of three to four

persons comprising at least one member of the local consultant IHC and a senior staff

member either from GESTO or AQUALOGUS, presumably:


INCEPTION REPORT

52 ID.2014.R.003.1

1. Chandra Adriawan (IHC)

2. Joana Santos (GESTO)

3. Francisco Carvalho (AQUALOGUS)

4. Fábio Santos (AQUALOGUS)

Considering the feedback obtained and the advancement of the works, the team may be

divided into two for time saving purposes.

Given language restraints, the local consultant will be responsible for the interactions with

the local authorities and the senior staff member will coordinate the assignment.

The visits shall consist of an initial kick-off meeting with the regional managers and main

responsible staff, including project presentation, goals and necessary clearance procedures,

followed by the first interaction with a designated local counterpart and finally several

operational working meetings with technical staff for data collection and regional

characterization.

Start: the task may start after the task 10 - Review of SHP role


12. Strategic analysis to review and prioritize SHP potential

The characterization of the projects listed in the PLN database of IPP’s requests is made upon

the IPP studies. Some of the studies are with the required level of detail for a feasibility

study, but some may not reach that level. One of the concerns in the evaluation of the

studies is to assess the quality of the studies at the planning level. Therefore, some indicators

should be obtained in order to make a classification of the prefeasibility study quality. The

quality of the prefeasibility study may be an early indicator of the overall capacity of the IPP

for the project development and, consequently, the actual feasibility of the project.

Nevertheless, a site location with a poor feasibility study may still have hydropower potential

and should not be discarded. In this sense, an update of the already identified potential,

including the outcomes of the previous task will be performed, on one hand, taking into

consideration the data provided in the prefeasibility study (if available), on the other hand,

taking into consideration the datasets of information collected on 6 – Comprehensive

Compilation of Existing Info and Data.

Site visits are only expected for a few sites, if any, and just in case there are some significant

conflicting issues between nearby projects or in case a highly promising project lacks

important field characterization. The CONSULTANT will make an effort to identify any

eventual need to perform them as soon as possible with the hopes to combine the event


INCEPTION REPORT

53 ID.2014.R.003.1

with the visits to the wilayahs of the previous task, taking advantage of the mobilization and

presence of a team. Nonetheless, the team that will conduct them shall not differ greatly

from the one that performed the visits to the wilayahs with the possible addition of any

other specialized member to be defined. The local consultant will be responsible for the

logistics preparation of the visits and interaction with local authorities and population and

the international consultants will be responsible for the technical supervision of the

assignment. The establishment of a local PLN counterpart that might preferably accompany

the site visits would also be extremely helpful, if not crucial.

The visits shall comprise a preliminary site assessment from the team of experts, consisting

mainly of visual observation and simple surveys and verifications (e.g. GPS coordinates, flow

regime, surface geotechnical considerations, land cover). Topographic and geotechnical

surveys and hydrological measurements are not comprised.

The compiled list of small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi will be

reviewed and prioritized through a gradual screening as the information is gathered and the

analysis undertaken become more thorough and complete, taking into account the

hydrological, geological, sediment, environmental, and social risks, access, land ownership,

protected and environmentally sensitive areas, military and other exclusion zones, and

security issues, reviewing the cost estimates conducted in previous studies.

The screening process to be implemented will follow the process described in Figure 4.5.

Figure 4.5 - Workflow of small hydro prioritizing process.


INCEPTION REPORT

54 ID.2014.R.003.1

The first phase (Phase 1) of the screening will consist on a selection to exclude any small

hydro projects that are already constructed or under construction, or with execution plans

under development, as it will not be an option for future capacity planning. Projects for

which exact location (coordinates) where not retrieved will also be excluded.

Next step (Phase 2) consists on an initial multi-criteria analysis with different criterion and

corresponding relevance in order to sort out the best projects, followed by a one by one

analysis to reach the Phase 2 Selection.

The multi-criteria analysis will weight quantitative and qualitative variables, for an overall

score to rank the projects. This will allow in a first screening to eliminate projects below a

chosen cut-out score for a given region. The determination of the cut-out score is dependent

from the availability of sites and hydropower potential and will be assessed with PLN.

As an example, quantitative criterion may be:

LCOE - Levelized Cost Of Electricity

Capacity and annual energy production estimate;

Budget estimate;

Affected population;

On the other hand, some qualitative criteria may follow:

Water-use constraints;

Protected and environmentally sensitive areas;

Local electrification demand and/or transmission access;

Land access issues;

Military and other exclusion zones;

Ease of access for commissioning and maintenance purposes;

Assessment of possible long-term climate change impacts;

The World Bank’s Safeguards policies.

For the evaluation of the criteria, available studies will be taken into account, reviewed

through the information retrieved from GIS and hydrologic simulation and cost estimation, in

order to compare less detailed studies on the same common ground.

In order to be able to evaluate the first three listed quantitative criteria, a preliminary

analysis of hydroelectric potential of all projects must be performed and it will depend on the

level of detail of the consulted studies. If necessary, a preliminary surface runoff map will be

constructed in order to give an early estimate of each site mean annual runoff.

For the surface runoff determination an indirect approach will be used - the Turc method.

This method is a standard and widespread monthly rainfall-runoff model whose inputs are


INCEPTION REPORT

55 ID.2014.R.003.1

monthly time series of rainfall totals and long term estimates of annual potential

evapotranspiration. It is worth mentioning that this task may comprise the integration of

global databases (TRMM, GPCP, and Worldclim) and ground-based data (local) where

available in a timely manner, always aiming to provide the highest level of accuracy possible.

Below is a summary representation of the workflow for the surface runoff modeling.

Figure 4.6 - Summary representation of the workflow for the surface runoff modeling.

The next step is to simulate multiple scenarios for different hydro schemes, evaluating not

only electricity generation potential, either to be taken from the studies or simulated using a

flow duration curve, but also estimating relevant costs based on CAPEX and OPEX cost-curves

(adapted and calibrated to local conditions, if data is provided).

For each location multiple combinations of the above mentioned influencing parameters

(i.e.: several heights of dam or lengths of penstocks for a given site) are simulated. This

process will allow a review on the cost estimates conducted in previous studies and the

design optimization.

The optimization of the design and cost estimates allows the determination of preliminary

LCOE’s for each project, as well as their energy production. The rest of the evaluated criteria

will require adequate and updated information in the form of key GIS layers compiled. This

Runoff isolines [mm]

Input datasets

Rainfall Dataset

Temperature Dataset

Other climatic or auxilliary datasets if needed by selected rainfall – runoff method

Accumulating procedures to derive the distributed

watershed climatic variables at the pour

points

Rainfall – Runoff methods to obtain the accumulated

flow at the watershed pour points

Iterative de-accumulation of runoff in order to obtain the 1st order

derivation of runoff (flow isolines)

Hydrology rainfall-runoff processing chart Outputs

Legend

Runoff (at watershed pourpoint)

m3/s

0 - 1

2 - 100

101 - 200

201 - 500

501 - 1000

1001 - 1500

1501 - 3000

3001 - 4500

4501 - 6278

Watershed (defined at pour point)Rainfall [mm] and Temperature [ C]

Mean daily flow [ in m3/s] or mean annual volume [m3]


INCEPTION REPORT

56 ID.2014.R.003.1

information will be loaded in the attributes of the SHP database, as well as the score of the

multi-criteria analysis. A project shall be excluded if its score is above the lower acceptable

limit for that region.

The results from the multi-criteria screening shall secondly be reviewed considering the focus

on supporting isolated grid systems, consisting on a one by one analysis, considering

population and load centers, power grid including 20kV substations and above.

This process will also require the selection/exclusion of competitor projects, as many can be

submerged by the dam reservoir of another, the exclusion of small hydro projects with no

significant contribution to the power capacity of a studied isolated system and of projects

which are too distant from the grid or from any point of demand. To aid in this process of

one by one analysis, some site visits might be promoted. The visits to some of the sites could

provide the collection of important information that will help in the decision making at this

stage.

In Phase 3, the final prioritization will result of a strategic analysis consisting of evaluating

each project within the defined criteria for major strategic options. Major strategic options

may include hydroelectric potential, Regional development, off grid Electrification, Least cost

planning, Environmental impact and other constraints.

A set of key indicators for Phases 2 and 3 will be worked closely with PLN to achieve the best

performance. The strategic analysis will produce a ranking of the projects on a step by step

procedure that will allow reaching the list of promising sites.

Start: the task may start after task 12-Strategic analysis to review and prioritize SHP potential


13. List of most promising SHP sites

The strategic analysis, applied to the selected regions, will provide a list of promising sites,

according to the set of indicators. The list of most promising sites will be derived from the

selected weights of those indicators and it will be submitted for approval by the client.

Start: the task may start after task 12-Strategic analysis to review and prioritize SHP potential



INCEPTION REPORT

57 ID.2014.R.003.1

14. Draft Small Hydropower Mapping reports

The previous activities will be reported and a draft will be presented for client’s approval.

In the main report, entitled “Small Hydropower Mapping”, the methods and results of the

country-wide resource maps for small hydro will be summarized. The report will include

maps created from GIS layers and will present existing information on small hydro in

Indonesia. The report will be constructed in order to be a future guide for the updating of the

database and the inclusion of new data.

In a separate report, which will be named “Review and Update of Small Hydro in NTT,

Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi”, the methods and results from the review and

prioritization of small hydro will be described in a way that replication for other regions may

be possible in the future.

Start: the task may start after the task 13 - List of most promising SHP sites.


15. Workshop

A workshop will be held in Jakarta to present the results to the client, get feedback from

stakeholders and discuss next steps. The workshop will have two day duration. The first day

to present the results to PLN (session A), the second to present the results to the

stakeholders (session B)6.

Both session A and B intend to promote a framework and comprehensive explanation of the

development work, but to different group targets. In the presentation to the client a deeper

focus on the methods will be made, while for stakeholders a focus on results, lessons learned

and consequences will be made.

Nonetheless, if found more fruitful a single session joint workshop for both PLN and

stakeholders might be considered.

The workshop sessions are summarized in Table 4.7.

6 In the preliminary proposed methodology, the workshop was planned with the duration of one more day for training of PLN staff. Given that the scope of the assignment includes a training component (that was optional in the proposal), the staff training will be addressed in that specific component.


INCEPTION REPORT

58 ID.2014.R.003.1

Table 4.7 - Workshop sessions target, topics and duration.

Session Target Topics Duration

A PLN directors, PLN staff responsible for generation planning, hydraulics and dams, wilayahs managers

Source data Methodologies Difficulties and how it was overcome Shortlists of projects (scenarios) Discussion and scenario selection for stakeholders presentation

1 day

B Stakeholders – HPP promoters, local authorities, equipment industry, construction industry, regulatory departments(energy, water, environment)

Brief presentation of source data and methodologies; Shortlists of projects (selected scenarios) Discussion

½ day

Start: the task may start up to two weeks before the scheduled delivery of the draft report

Duration of the task: 2 Weeks

16. Small Hydropower Mapping report

Following the draft review by the client, the feedback from the workshop and the necessary

changes, the final reports on Small Hydropower Mapping and Review and Update of Small

Hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi will be delivered to the client for his

approval.

Start: the task may start after the Workshop.


Support to the inclusion of Small Hydro Potential to the Geospatial Electrification Planning for NTT,

Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

17. Coordination with the parallel GEP tool contract

The coordination with the parallel contract will start by working with the load nodes

resultant from the Network Planner, for the base case of off-grid alternative from PV and the

assumed grid generation costs by the Earth Institute in the parallel contract.

The demand, aggregated in this preliminary way, will give the order of magnitude of the

required capacity in each island, region, and isolated system. This will allow limiting the

capacity of the projects and achieving a worst case scenario LCOE for those load nodes.


INCEPTION REPORT

59 ID.2014.R.003.1

The second approach is to obtain the best LCOE for each site, through the optimization of the

capacity for the site. This will allow achieving the best case scenario for the site.

The true capacity and LCOE of the possible hydropower project to meet the demand, under

the assumptions used by the Earth Institute, will be in this range. The CONSULTANT will work

closely with the Earth Institute in order to achieve the balance between load and LCOE for

the hydropower projects.

The coordination with the parallel GEP tool contract, although being a task itself, is meant to

be performed right from the task 10- -Review of SHP role. At this point of the work plan, the

CONSULTANT will prepare the delivery of information to the EI, assuring that all the required

information regarding small hydropower plants for the Network Planner is prepared and in a

compatible format.

Both teams had the opportunity to meet during the EI/Castalia final workshop and exchange

some preliminary information. The need for a written authorization from PLN allowing EI to

provide information to the CONSULTANT was foreseen and should be worked right away, as

the EI needs to abide to the MoU signed with PLN.

The contact between the teams will be preferentially remote, but if work plans allow, any

workshops or meetings to be held in Jakarta may be aligned in order to promote the

cooperation and get together the regional teams working in both contracts.

Start: the task may start after the delivery of the reports of the Activity 1.


18. List of potential SHP sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi to be incorporated in

the GEP tool

From the list of sites obtained in Activity 1 and after the review based on the coordination

with the parallel GEP tool contract, a final list of sites will be delivered to the Earth Institute

in order to be incorporated in the GEP tool. The format of data will be compatible with the

form required by the Geospatial Electrification Planning.

If the preliminary results from the Network Planner indicate the need for modification of the

list of potential SHP sites, the CONSULTANT will revise or expand the list in order to promote

both the off-grid electrification as well as lowering the costs of grid connected generation.

Start: the task may start after the coordination with the parallel GEP tool contract task



INCEPTION REPORT

60 ID.2014.R.003.1

19. Revision of interim and final results from the GEP tool

The results from Activity 1 will then be provided to the Geospatial Electrification Tool in order

to optimize electrification in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi. The CONSULTANT will

also work closely with the parallel project to review the interim and final results from a hydro

generation point of view.

The CONSULTANT will further coordinate the final reporting of conducted work with the

parallel contract to assure that the WB and the Client receives a complete description of the

Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning process in

Indonesia.

Start: the task may start after a preliminary version of the List of potential SHP sites in NTT,

Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi to be incorporated in the GEP tool

Duration of the task: 1.5 months

20. Policy recommendations on the development of SHP in Indonesia

The final report will include policy recommendations on the development of small hydro in

Indonesia, based on the results and experience of the assignment.

Start: the task may start after a preliminary version of the revision of interim and final results

from the GEP tool


21. Final workshop

The CONSULTANT will participate and contribute to a final workshop in Jakarta to present the

final results for the Client and stakeholders.

Start: the task may start after the policy recommendations on the development of SHP in

Indonesia task

Duration of the task: 2 weeks

22. Final reports

The CONSULTANT will produce a Final Report with the summarized findings of Activity 2.

Start: the task may start after the final workshop



INCEPTION REPORT

61 ID.2014.R.003.1

Training in GIS and Small Hydro Mapping and Validation

Training in GIS

A. Introduction to GIS

The introduction to GIS is designed for individuals without previous knowledge (or very little

knowledge) of GIS. The main objectives of the Introduction to GIS is to provide knowledge to

PLN on the chosen platform Quantum GIS for the creation of GIS maps, exploration and

analysis of the data stored in the Hydropower Database, as well as adding external data do

maps to elaborate maps with different context. The topics covered by this module are

described below:

• Create and explore a GIS map

• Components of a GIS

• Geographic data and tabular formats

• Metadata

• Coordinate systems

• Sources of GIS data

• Navigating on a GIS map

• Finding features

• Identify features and gather information

• Feature symbology

• Solving beginner spatial problems

• Best practices to share maps and results

• Best practices on geographic data organization for a mapping project

Start: the task may start after the task 15 - Workshop

Duration of the task: 20 hours

B. Editing and data creation

The editing and data creation module will provide PLN the skills to create, explore, manage

and analyze geographic data, with special care to the information gathered in the national

GIS database on small hydro. The topics covered by this module are listed below:


INCEPTION REPORT

62 ID.2014.R.003.1

• Geographic data creation, organization and editing

• Layers management, symbology and labels

• Design page layouts and printing

• Setting scale ranges in layer display

• Querying data

• Grouping layers

• Solving intermediate spatial problems

• Storing data in a database

• Qualitative and quantitative data

• Symbology by attributes and classification

• Fields and value calculation

• Join and relate

Start: the task may start after the module A - Introduction to GIS


C. Analysis and mapping

The analysis and mapping module will prepare PLN staff to develop a workflow for any GIS

analysis. The first step of the workflow is the placement of the problem and the

consideration of the available criteria. The topics covered by this module are listed below:

• Workflow steps

• Data quality and coordinate systems

• Buffer

• Voronoi and Thiessen Polygons

• Distance matrix

• Overlay tools

• Terrain analysis

• Hydrology models

• Raster statistics

• Thematic Maps

• Layouts

Start: the task may start after the module B - Editing and data creation



INCEPTION REPORT

63 ID.2014.R.003.1

Mapping and validation of small hydro

D. Grid connection, isolated systems and backup

The grid connection, isolated systems and complementarity of renewable sources will focus

on whether an identified site is suitable for a grid connection project, isolated, or both,

through the consideration of the connection available and its distance, as well as the

requirements in terms of intermittency of the production to supply an isolated grid, the need

of backup and the sizing of batteries or diesel backup. The complementarity with other

energy sources may be studied if suitable in PLN plans.

Start: the task may start after the task 21 - Final Workshop


E. Risks and selection of works on hydropower development

The risks and selection of works on hydropower development will give trainees the insights

on type of works and selection methodology, given the site characteristics, the pros and cons

of each type. The risks and environmental concerns will also be addressed.

Start: the task may start after the module D - Grid connection, isolated systems and backup


F. Hydrology and hydrological modelling

The hydrology and hydrological modelling will cover all the techniques applied in the

development of the small hydro database. From the acquisition methods of data, the

management of information, to technical applications such as the data consistency analysis,

workflows to obtain the flow duration curve.

Start: the task may start after the module E - Risks and selection of works on hydropower

development



INCEPTION REPORT

64 ID.2014.R.003.1

G. Hydraulic design at plan level

The hydraulic design at this level will consist on the achievement of the main characteristics

of the civil works and equipment, gathered from the topographical characteristics,

considering the hydrology and hydrological modelling of the watershed, in order to meet the

energy demand.

Start: the task may start after the module F - Hydrology and hydrological modelling


H. Project design work

The project design work will include all the covered areas of knowledge and its application

will be the primary focus. Besides the application of the concepts and the design of

proprietary excel worksheets, the ones used by the CONSULTANT will be extensively

explained to allow its use by the staff of PLN.

Start: the task may start after the module G - Hydraulic design at plan level



INCEPTION REPORT

65 ID.2014.R.003.1

4.6 MILESTONES

The following represent key project milestones, with estimated completion dates:

Milestone Estimated Completion Date

Inception Phase

Initial Steering Committee Meeting April 2014

Inception Report Mid July 2014

Decision Meeting Late August 2014

MoU for Data Provision Late August 2014

Creating a GIS Database for National Information on SHP Development

Comprehensive Compilation of Existing Info and End of September 2014

Designing of GIS Database on SHP development Late December 2014

SHP Role and Potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi

Region visits Early January 2014

List of most promising sites Late July 2015

Reporting and Activity 1 Workshop

Draft Report Mid-September 2015

Workshop Late September 2015

Training part 1 Late September 2015

SHP Mapping Report Late October 2015

Approval Late November 2015

Coordination with the Parallel Contract

List of potential sites Late January 2016

Final workshop Late February 2016

Training part 2 Mid March 2016

Final Reports/Approval Late March 2016

PLN/WB approval or feedback

Travel dates


INCEPTION REPORT

66 ID.2014.R.003.1

4.7 WORKPLAN

Task # ACTIVITY 1

Task INCEPTION

Task 1 INCEPTION MISSION

Task 2 INITIAL COMPILATION OF EXISTING INFO AND DATA

Task 3 DETAIL OF PRELIMINARY METHODOLOGY

Task 4 INCEPTION REPORT

DECISION MEETING

Task 5 FINAL METHODOLOGY

CREATING A GIS DATABASE FOR NATIONAL INFORMATION ON SHP DEVELOPMENT

Task 6 COMPREHENSIVE COMPILATION OF EXISTING INFO AND DATA

Task 7 DESIGNING A GIS DATABASE ON SHP DEVELOPMENT

Task 8 CREATION OF MAPS OF FINDINGS IN SHP DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA

Task 9 DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSAL ON HOSTING AND OPERATION OF THE SHP GIS DATABASE

SHP ROLE AND POTENTIAL IN NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI

Task 10 REVIEW OF SHP ROLE

Task 11 UPDATE OF ALREADY IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL FOR SHP DEVELOPMENT

Task 12 STRATEGIC ANALYSIS TO REVIEW AND PRIORITIZE SHP POTENTIAL

Task 13 LIST OF MOST PROMISING SHP SITES

REPORTING AND ACTIVITY 1 WORKSHOP

Task 14 DRAFT SHP MAPPING REPORT

Task 15 WORKSHOP

Task 16 SHP MAPPING REPORT

APPROVAL OF REPORT

ACTIVITY 2

Task 17 COORDINATION WITH THE PARALELL GEP TOOL CONTRACT

Task 18 LIST OF POTENTIAL SHP SITES IN NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI TO BE INCORPORATED IN THE GEP TOOL

Task 19 REVISION OF INTERIM AND FINAL RESULTS FROM THE GEP TOOL

Task 20 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHP IN INDONESIA

Task 21 FINAL WORKSHOP

Task 22 FINAL REPORTS

TRAINING

TRAINING IN GIS

MAPPING AND VALIDATION OF SMALL HYDRO

Travel to/from Indonesia Duration of sub-activity

Travel within Indonesia Duration of task

Deliverable Validation/approval from the WB/GoI

Workshop/Capacity Building

WB/GoI decisions

Mar-15Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Feb-16 Mar-16Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16Completed Aug-14


INCEPTION REPORT

67 ID.2014.R.003.1

5 CONCLUSIONS

The Inception Mission allowed the CONSULTANT to take the pulse of the current status of small

hydropower and geographical information systems at PLN and the framework for small hydropower

development in Indonesia.

The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources has promoted a legal framework to streamline small

hydropower in Indonesia, opening it up to the private sector. PLN is currently the off-taker for the

regulated Feed-in Tariff. However, in the processes of hydropower licensing, the resource evaluation is

only took by the promoter, who takes all the assumptions and the risk, facing financing difficulties in the

end of the licensing process, not reaching the financial close of the PPA. Cooperation and financial

agencies seem to be willing to support the small hydropower business, to which an evaluation of

potential and resources may be a handful tool. Hence, with this assignment the CONSULTANT believes

being able to grant PLN:

a clear picture of the potential each PPA request has, in the regions of NTT, Maluku, Maluku

Utara and Sulawesi,

a tool to store and manage the PPA request information,

a tool to analyze and evaluate the potential of a site location,

a process to cope with the prioritization and ranking of multiple sites.

The CONSULTANT concludes that the methodology originally presented on the Technical Proposal was

adequate for the study, but the work plan needed to be slightly revised to take into consideration some

data clearance issues that culminated on the tentative establishment of the MoU for data provision for

the project. In fact, it is supposed that the acceptance of the final methodology is coincident with the

provision of the required data. The CONSULTANT will abide to any restriction on the use of the data that

PLN may impose, as long as it is accepted by The World Bank and allows for the fulfillment of the

project. Moreover, opening the info of the GIS database to the general public is ultimately PLN’s

decision, since the project could be performed as intended only for PLN’s internal access or alternatively

with different levels of access (defined by PLN for that matter) and it would still be an extremely valid

planning/management tool. Notwithstanding, additional tasks have been foreseen in order to give PLN

and the WB the option of replacing the required information by performing a greenfield study of the

small hydropower resources and remaking the MapInfo database from the softcopy of the JICA Master

plan.

Based on the data provision experience during the Inception Mission, the CONSULTANT considers it to

be essential for the focus of the project in Sulawesi, NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara, that PLN Pusat

should timely inform local management of the upcoming assignments and thus grant easy access to the

required information and assistance in meetings with external local authorities or any other relevant

field work.


INCEPTION REPORT

68 ID.2014.R.003.1

The cooperation with the team working in the parallel contract is expected to occur in an early phase of

the project. Both teams had the opportunity to meet during the Inception Meeting and it was foreseen

the need of a written authorization from PLN in order to allow EI/Castalia to share the information with

the CONSULTANT. The first main exchange of information is expected to occur in Activity 1 - task 10,

mainly collecting data from the EI to be analyzed by the CONSULTANT. The second, should take place

along the Activity 2, where the interaction between both teams will take place in order to build

coherent visions between small hydropower and network planning.

The training components have been fully integrated into the project. The first part of the training,

Training in GIS, will be held after the first workshop on Small Hydro Mapping. The second, Mapping and

validation on small hydro, will take place after the final workshop. We believe that this approach is fully

suited not only to the initial Terms of Reference of the project, which were fully aligned with the

objectives of the study, but also for the available data in the PLN and current status of Geographical

Information Systems in the institution.


INCEPTION REPORT

69 ID.2014.R.003.1

REFERENCES

Agency, National Geospatial Intelligence. GEOnet Names Server (GNS). n.d. http://earth-

info.nga.mil/gns/html/ (accessed 06 09, 2014).

—. VMAPO. n.d. http://gis-lab.info/qa/vmap0-eng.html (accessed 06 09, 2014).

BIG, Badan Informasi Geospasial. Indonesian Geospatial Information Agency. n.d.

http://www.bakosurtanal.go.id/ (accessed 06 09, 2014).

DEN, Dewan Energi Nasional. "Kebijakan Energi Nasional (KEN) 2014-2050." Jakarta, 2014.

ESA, European Space Agency. GlobCover. n.d. http://due.esrin.esa.int/globcover/ (accessed 06 09,

2014).

GADM. Global Adminstrative Areas. n.d. http://www.gadm.org/ (accessed 06 09, 2014).

IHC. IHC knowledgebase. n.d. http://www.indonesia-hydro.com/knowledge_base (accessed 06 09,

2014).

JICA. "Project for the Master Plan Study of Hydropower Development in Indonesia." Jakarta, 2011.

MoEMR. "Pengelolaan Energi Nasional (PEN) 2006-2025." Jakarta, 2006.

MoEMR. "Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Nasiona 2012-2031l (RUKN)." Jakarta, 2012.

MoFo. WebGIS Forest. n.d. http://webgis.dephut.go.id (accessed 06 09, 2014).

PLN. "Rencana Umum Pertagananana Listrika (RUPTL) 2013-2022." Jakarta, 2013.

USGS. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). n.d. http://srtm.usgs.gov/ (accessed 06 09, 2014).

WDPA, World Database on Protected Areas. Protected Planet. n.d. http://www.protectedplanet.net/

(accessed 06 09, 2014).

WMO, World Meteorological Organization. n.d. http://www.wmo.int/ (accessed 06 09, 2014).

WorldClim. WorldClim - Global Climate Data. n.d. http://www.worldclim.org/ (accessed 06 09, 2014).

GESTO ENERGIA S.A.

Av. Cáceres Monteiro, nº 10, 1º Sul

1495-131 Algés, Portugal

T. +351 211 579 899

F. +351 211 540 900

www.gestoenergy.com



INDONESIA

INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX I

TERMS OF REFERENCE

July 2014

Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia

Page 1 of 17

TERMS OF REFERENCE

Small Hydropower Mapping and

Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning

Indonesia

Project ID: P145273

Selection #: 1125330

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES 1. These Terms of Reference (TOR) relate to a Request for Proposals (RFP) for services as part of a

technical assistance project being implemented by the World Bank (’WB’, the recipient for this work) in Indonesia (the ‘Client’) which aims to support resource mapping and geospatial planning for small hydropower. It is being undertaken in close coordination with PLN, the World Bank’s primary Client country counterpart for this project. The project is funded by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a global knowledge and technical assistance program administered by the World Bank and supported by 11 bilateral donors, and is part of a global ESMAP initiative in support of renewable energy mapping.

2. The ESMAP initiative is supporting country-driven efforts to improve renewable energy (RE) resource awareness, put in place appropriate policy frameworks for RE development, and provide ‘open access’ to resource and geospatial data. It will also support the IRENA Global Atlas1 by improving the data availability and quality that can be accessed through IRENA’s online mapping portal on a modular basis. The initiative will support five phases of resource mapping and geospatial planning activities, as illustrated in Figure 1. The phases are intended to illustrate the key steps (resource mapping, geospatial planning, and development of policy recommendations) plus a range of supporting activities running concurrently.

3. This consulting opportunity relates to one of several projects that will procure services under the Indefinite Delivery Agreements (framework contracts) signed between the WB and selected consulting firms/consortia (‘Vendors’) as a result of “Selection 1092748: Framework Agreement for Small Hydropower Data and Resource Mapping Services”. The TOR for Selection 1088343 provide further details on the background and scope of the ESMAP initiative, in addition to the information available on the ESMAP website.2

1 See http://www.irena.org/globalatlas/ for further details.

2 http://www.esmap.org/RE_Mapping

http://www.irena.org/globalatlas/

http://www.esmap.org/RE_Mapping


Page 2 of 17

Figure 1: Five phases of RE resource mapping being supported under the ESMAP initiative.

4. This project in Indonesia is being developed in response to strong Client demand, and has benefited from the input of Client counterparts in terms of the scoping and prioritization of activities. A scoping mission was undertaken in August 2013 where representatives from the World Bank met with key Client counterparts. The work will be embedded within the World Bank’s ongoing energy sector dialogue with the Client, and should be viewed as a component in a package of ongoing technical assistance and financial support.

COUNTRY AND SECTOR CONTEXT

5. Indonesia has an energy mix which is dominated by fossil fuels (coal, crude oil, gas). Renewable Energy (mainly geothermal and hydro) contributes presently only to 7.2% of the energy mix. Hydro only contributes to 2.0%. In the power sector Indonesia has about 40 GW of installed capacity (27 GW of these are in Java-Bali). About 3.8 GW is installed hydro and 3.2 GW geothermal. Rapidly decreasing power reserves will further lower RE’s share of the power mix, as the government


Page 3 of 17

currently undergoes a fast track program to build about 20 GW of coal-fired power plants.

6. The Government of Indonesia’s (GoI) policy is therefore to support RE and it has set a goal that 25% of the energy mix in 2025 shall come from renewable energy. A Presidential regulation 4/2010 instructs PLN to accelerate the development of new power generation plants in which RE comprises 40% of the power plant candidates. The GoI also in 2010 introduced a Feed-in-Tariff for small RE to encourage private investments in clean power production. The present power master plan (RUPTL) includes 6,250 MW of hydro to be commissioned through 2021. In the near term, as part of phase II of the Fast Track program (up to 2014), 1,750 MW of hydro is planned.

7. GoI policy also aims to increase electrification access from the present 75% to 95% by 2025. Access is mainly low in the remote areas of Java and Bali and in islands outside the area covered by the Java-Bali system. As one of the actions, the GoI has launched the 1,000-island electrification program under which PLN plans to convert isolated-grids in Indonesia’s islands from diesel-based generation to renewable diesel hybrid systems, and introduce renewable energy generation (mainly solar PV, and mini-hydro) at greenfield sites, combined with network expansion at project locations.

8. Small hydro in Indonesia is defined as schemes below 10 MW. Based on this definition, of the currently installed total hydro capacity of 3,800 MW, about 250 MW is small hydro. The RUPTL includes plans for small hydro development of 660 MW up to year 2021. The majority of these are anticipated to be developed as IPPs (575 MW). Geographically, 180 MW are anticipated in Java/Bali, 200 MW in East Indonesia and 195 MW in West Indonesia. A steep increase in planned small hydro during the last years can be seen as an effect of the Feed-in-Tariff. In the 2009 RUPTL the plans for small hydro only included 268 MW (200 MW for IPP). The increase in the 2011 RUPTL reflects the large number of requested PPAs to PLN from private investors during the last few years.

9. The role of small hydro in Indonesia is linked to the cost of generation and the configuration of transmission and distribution systems in the country. Since the focus of conducted hydro plans has been on generation for grid extension, the long-term marginal costs for existing grids have been used as one the screening tools. Therefore, most small hydro was screened off because estimated costs per kWh for small hydro in general are higher than the long-term marginal cost. The long-term marginal cost for power generation, however, varies much across Indonesia. Costs in the Java and Bali where the grid is well developed are below 0.1 $/Kwh, while costs in remote provinces, such as Maluku, may be above 0.2 $/kWh. Furthermore, isolated small grid systems or household power are almost exclusively based on diesel generators, which would have unit costs in the order of 0.3-0.5 $/kWh. Because of the wide difference in existing production costs across Indonesia and between grid connected and isolated grid systems, the role of hydro is from an economic point of view therefore mostly of interest in isolated systems and in remote provinces of Indonesia. The FIT introduced in 2010 has, however, partly changed the role of small hydro based on economic viability. Small hydro has as a result therefore also become of interest in the regions of Sumatra and Java, which can be clearly seen by the current activity in small hydro from private investors.

PROJECT CONTEXT

10. Hydro mapping and planning has been done on regular basis for Indonesia. Hydropower Master Plans were conducted 1983, 1999, and 2011 by PLN, supported by JICA. The Hydro Master Plan gives


Page 4 of 17

input to the National Power Master Plans that are updated annually (RUPTL). The Hydro Master Plan in 1999 was based on a gross list of potential projects at 1,249 sites. Of these 347 had an estimated optimum capacity below 10 MW. The latest 2011 Master Plan resulted in a final list of 74 hydro projects with total capacity of 8,040 MW to be developed and commissioned up to 2027. None of these are small hydro.

11. In addition to the National Hydro Master Plan, plans and development of small hydro are conducted on an ad-hoc basis. The feed-in tariff introduced in 2010 has resulted in a large number of private investors having secured preliminary permits with the local governments and many of these have been further studied. PLN has so far got 239 requests (1,066 MW) for PPAs for small hydro. Of these 29 are already under operation, 36 are under construction, and the remaining are under procurement or are negotiating PPAs. It is unclear how these sites were identified, and how many of these overlap the 1999 Master Plan gross list of sites. PLN has also by request of some local governments signed MoUs for identification and preparation studies for small hydro. Examples are in parts of Papua and Sulawesi. Recently also donor initiatives have targeted small RE resource mapping for parts of Indonesia, (e.g. a new project just starting on Sumba Island in NTT is supported by ADB).

12. In Indonesia mapping of hydro resources has thus already been conducted to a large extent. However, for small hydro there are limited coordination and prioritization of private investments and local initiatives, and there exists no systematic approach to how mapping or planning exercises are conducted. Furthermore, the progress and results of the planning and development of small hydro is not summarized in any central database. Preliminary permits are available only at district level at the local governments. Lists of PPA requests from private investors and results of PLN’s own mapping exist in Jakarta but are not consolidated and stored in one place.

13. Conducted hydro mapping and planning in Indonesia is traditional in the sense that it focuses on grid extension. Because of this focus small hydro for isolated systems was generally not considered. In isolated systems a high levelized cost may still be economically viable compared to the much higher cost of diesel or PV solar hybrid generation. As an example from the 1999 Hydro Master Plan there are identified 61 potential sites below 5 MW in NTT, an area which has 550 islands and are dominated by isolated systems, has an electrification rate below 50%, and 99% of existing installed power capacity is based on diesel. None of these 61 sites passed the screening based on long-term marginal costs, which would probably not be the case if the screening limit had been based on the production costs in isolated systems. The planning of small hydro in small isolated grid systems would also be different compared to traditional mapping in the sense that limited demand will likely not require maximization of the generation capacity at every site.

14. Private investments in hydropower need three steps; i) preliminary permit at District level, ii) an approved PPA with PLN, for which they conduct an inter-connection study, and iii) an operational license. The exchange of information between steps is not optimal and often PLN does not know of the plans until they are fairly advanced and many investments already have been made for land acquisition and preparatory studies. This risks leading to non-optimized design of schemes, and sometimes leads to conflicts on the point of interconnection. The schemes may also be rejected at a late stage if the proposed small hydro schemes affect negatively on larger hydro projects under the national master plan.


Page 5 of 17

15. Electrification expansion is conducted through ‘road maps’ proposed by PLN’s local offices (wilayahs). The expansion road maps are made based on factors such as magnitude of demand and distance from the existing electricity grid, and electrification ratio. It is not conducted on a least cost basis. The World Bank, supported by AusAID, and ASTAE is thus supporting a geospatial least cost electrification planning TA in Indonesia with the purpose to develop electrification planning capacity of PLN . A geospatial electrification planning tool has been developed by Earth Institute (Columbia University, NY) as a least cost optimization tool for grid extension and development of island based grids, and isolated systems, and is currently being applied in NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara. The tool has the possibility to include different generation sources for isolated systems.

OBJECTIVES

16. Based on the sector and project context it is concluded that small hydro can play a role in clean power generation in Indonesia, and that there is interest from both the GOI and private investors to develop small hydro, but that there lacks promotion and coordinated planning of small hydro development. The sought consultancy services thus have an overall objective to mainstream small hydro into the planning process for generation growth and electrification planning in Indonesia.

17. Specifically the consultancy services have the specific purpose to:

a. Facilitate and improve the planning process of small hydro in both grid and isolated systems through establishment of GIS-based databases, which will help PLN to optimize development and avoid conflicts with long-term maximized utilization of the resource.

b. Promote and facilitate the role of small hydro in remote areas and in isolated grid systems, where the need is to go from planning small hydro based on maximized capacity and least cost per kWh, to customizing schemes (stand alone or hybrid) to demand to get the highest benefit of substituting diesel.

18. The consultancy services will be done in parallel on two scales following expressed interest from PLN:

a. Building up a central database on small hydro at a national scale to be housed in PLN’s central office in Jakarta.

b. Improved electrification planning by integrating small hydro potential for the provinces of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi in eastern Indonesia.

The two components will be linked through developing the national database on small hydro in such a way that it can feed input to the geospatial electrification planning tool, which is in the long-term aimed to be implemented for the entire country.

STRUCTURE OF CONSULTANCY SERVICES

19. The consultancy services for conducting small hydro mapping in Indonesia are proposed to be conducted under two contracts:

a. A contract covering the build-up of a national database of small hydro, improved and validated mapping of small hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi, and training in


Page 6 of 17

GIS and small hydro mapping (optional).

b. A contract covering the extended digitizing of electrification grid systems and power demand for Sulawesi, updated Geospatial Electrification Planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi including small hydro potential, and training in the use of the updated planning tool.

20. These TOR cover the first contract (a). Because of the focus on mainstreaming small hydro and improved strategic planning, capacity building of PLN to create knowledge and resources for continued application is important. Since funding for such training has yet not been secured at the writing of these TOR, the training component is included only as optional, and will not be included in the financial evaluation of the proposals. The proven capacity of the Vendors to provide training and technology transfer will be part of the technical evaluation, and a proposed methodology will be the basis for negotiation of an extended contract if funding will be made available.

21. The services for the second contract (b) will be procured and implemented in parallel with the requested scope in these TOR. The chosen Vendors will be requested to closely coordinate the scope of work between the two contracts.

OUTPUTS

22. This TOR document outlines a mapping project that aims to improve the quality and availability of information on Indonesia’s small hydropower resources. The project will provide the Client and commercial developers with data and maps that show the conducted work and levels of hydro potential, and highlight sites suited for small hydro projects.

23. Outputs from the mapping and geospatial planning activity will fall into a number of categories, including: i) data; ii) GIS layers; iii) atlas report; and iv) policy recommendations. The latter might be a non-exhaustive list of potential next steps towards a RE legislation and/or support to private investors, etc.

2. SCOPE OF WORK 24. This assignment covers Phases 1-4 for small hydro resource assessment (Figure 1). However,

because small hydro is already a significant part of PLN’s planning and operations in Indonesia and because of the vast geographical area of the country, the four phases have been customized into two activities.

Activity 1 – Data collection and production of a national small hydro GIS database and review and validation of small hydro potential for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi: Undertake a comprehensive scoping exercise, source and evaluate existing datasets, identify key stakeholders, carry out a detailed data gathering, and develop initial mapping outputs based on existing country-level datasets. Detailed review and update of small hydro potential for the areas of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi focusing on its possible role for isolated grids and electrification expansion. Validation of sites through detailed map studies and selected site visits. Inclusion of updated information for the four provinces in the national database.

Activity 2 – Support for the inclusion of small hydro potential in the geospatial electrification


Page 7 of 17

planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi: Review of existing Geospatial Electrification Planning tool in terms of its ability to include generation sources other than solar PVs, and suggestions for improvements to include small hydro potential. Provision of information on small hydro potential to be fed into the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool based on the updated and validated small hydro potential for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi.

25. Ground-based measurements and monitoring for validation are very difficult and costly and are thus outside of the scope for this assignment. Such ground-based measurements may, however, be recommended for the high potential small hydro sites identified in the above activities to inform future studies.

26. Validation and application of small hydro potential and integration in the electrification planning will further be conducted for only part of the country, to be continued by PLN for other areas. Because of the limitation in geographic scope, it is essential to build capacity within PLN to enable a continuation of the work. The small hydro mapping assignment in Indonesia therefore also includes a training component (which is optional, see Paragraph 20).

27. Phase 5 of the ESMAP initiative (Figure 1) is outside the scope of these TOR and is likely to be carried out by WB staff and by the Client (with specialist inputs commissioned where needed). However, the chosen Vendor will, based on the results and experience of the services, be requested to make suggestions on changes in policies for developing small hydro in Indonesia.

ACTIVITY 1: DATA COLLECTION AND PRODUCTION OF NATIONAL SMALL HYDRO GIS DATABASE, AND REVIEW AND VALIDATION OF SMALL HYDRO POTENTIAL FOR NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI

INCEPTION

28. Upon signing of the contract, the Vendor shall collect and compile relevant information and data sources regarding small hydro development in Indonesia. It is anticipated that the Vendor will need to travel to the country in the early stages of Phase 1 to carry out an Inception Mission, including meetings with the Client, the WB team and relevant stakeholders. The cost of doing so shall be included in the Financial Proposal.

29. The inception stage shall, besides assessment of available information, include an institutional assessment to identify stakeholders and organizations that will be essential for the project’s implementation and for the sustainability of its results. Emphasis shall be given to the institutional capacity for GIS database development, operations and maintenance.

30. Following the Inception Mission, the Vendor shall review compiled data and information, including feedback from meetings, to refine the focus of the study, and to finalize the detailed methodology. Special emphasis shall be given to complement previous work on small hydro potential and avoid duplication. For the purpose of this study ‘small hydro’ shall be defined as having a generation capacity of below 10 MW, including both grid-based and off-grid schemes, but the precise focus of the study will be determined during the Inception Mission.


Page 8 of 17

31. The findings of the pre-diagnostic exercise shall be summarized in an Inception Report, which will require approval by the Client and by the WB team for the continuation of the services. The results from the Inception Report shall be presented at a Decision Meeting by the Vendor’s management team, for discussion and decision on the final methodology. It should be assumed that the Decision Meeting will be held remotely via videoconference/Skype. However, the Vendor is requested to provide a quote for attendance at a physical meeting to be held in Jakarta, to be included in the optional components section of the Financial Proposal.

CREATING A GIS DATABASE FOR NATIONAL INFORMATION ON SMALL HYDRO DEVELOPMENT

32. After inception the Vendor shall conduct a compilation of all relevant data and information on existing, planned and potential small hydro in Indonesia. The main sources of data and information are anticipated to be from the Hydropower Master Plan’s gross list, PLN’s mapping work, information on private investments, and information from on-going parallel donor support programs.

33. Based on the availability of data types and characteristics, as well as the future benefits of the data for small hydro, the Vendor shall design a GIS database for PLN to store all relevant data on small hydro development. The design of the GIS database shall be made with emphasis on how it can promote and improve small hydro development in Indonesia, taking into account the information on the power sector compiled in the Inception Phase. It shall also be designed to enable input to the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool that has been developed for PLN (see Phase 4).

34. The GIS database shall, besides information on small hydro, be populated with readily available geographic data for Indonesia, such as e.g. administrative borders, topography, river networks, land use, forest conservation, population data, etc. The sources for geographic data are anticipated to be both global and national. Compilation and possible purchase of such data shall be conducted in liaison with PLN and the National Geospatial Institute (BIG). The consultant shall not assume any costs for such data in their proposal, other than work input needed to compile and include the data in the new GIS database.

35. The Vendor shall digitize and assign attributes in GIS format for relevant information on small hydro based on the compiled material, and feed this to the new GIS database. The Vendor shall also digitize and include other information especially essential for small hydro development, e.g. information on reservoirs and large hydro from the Hydro Master Plan.

36. The Vendor shall develop a proposal to PLN on the hosting, operation and maintenance of the small hydro GIS database. This should include the necessary hardware and software, necessary human and financial resources to sustain the database, and recommendations on where it should be hosted. The recommendation should also give guidance on data access and distribution. If institutional capacity is judged low and if data compilation is restricted, the proposed implementation shall be made as a step-wise process, in which PLN can gradually build up and populate the GIS database further than what will be possible under this assignment.

37. Based on the compiled data and the developed GIS database, the Vendor shall create maps that reflect existing findings on small hydro potential in Indonesia. This map will as much as possible include sites marked as having a high potential for small hydro.


Page 9 of 17

38. Spatial data collected by the Vendor, and which is judged by PLN as public, will need to be visualized and stored in the WB’s GIS platform. This platform will be able to display and analyze new data generated by the Vendor and as well as historical data from previous studies if this is made available. All spatial data will need to comply with the standards specified in Annex A.

REVIEW OF SMALL HYDRO’S ROLE IN NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI

39. Although one of the ideas of ESMAP’s small hydro mapping is ground-based monitoring of hydrology and geotechnical site investigations, these are too difficult to conduct in Indonesia within the time frame and budget because of the geographic characteristics with a large number of islands and very steep terrain. Instead the focus of the validation process in Activity 1 is on customizing the mapping of small hydro to the unique characteristics of the power grid in Indonesia, which is a result of the same difficult geographical characteristics. Populated remote areas are very costly to link to the main grid and the traditional mapping of hydro potential based on larger schemes connected to HV lines may not always be the best alternatives.

40. As a specific task in Activity 1, the Vendor shall therefore make a general review of the existing power generation and distribution situation in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. This review shall focus on an assessment of general strengths and weaknesses of using small hydro to supply power for medium and small isolated systems that are based mainly on LV and MV lines. Possible solutions for identified challenges related to e.g. grid stability or low firm power during dry seasons shall be suggested. Possibilities of using small hydro in hybrid systems should generally be assessed from a technical perspective.

REVIEW AND VALIDATION OF SMALL HYDRO POTENTIAL IN NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI

41. The Vendor shall create an updated list of already identified potential for small hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. This would include the list of projects identified for the national map (Paragraph 32), but should also include site visits to all major wilayahs to find local knowledge and interests from private investors. The Vendor shall make an attempt to compile information on preliminary permits for hydropower at the local governments.

42. This list of small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi shall first be reviewed and prioritized in regard to reliability of data and traditional risks for hydro development. The overall potential capacity of the sites shall be reviewed taking into account hydrological risk. Cost estimates conducted in previous studies shall be reviewed to take into account geological, sediment, environmental, and social risks. Other factors, such as access, land ownership, protected and environmentally sensitive areas, military and other exclusion zones, and security issues, shall be considered.

43. The list of small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi shall secondly be reviewed considering the focus on supporting isolated grid systems (see Paragraph 40). Considerations such as local power demand, distance to MV or LV lines and local load centers shall be taken into account in prioritizing and designing these schemes optimally. At the time of the start of the assignment at the beginning of 2014, the power grid including 20 kV and 150 kV lines, as well as population and load centers, will be available in digitized format for NTT, Maluku, and , Maluku Utara. The digitizing of corresponding information for Sulawesi will be conducted in parallel with the


Page 10 of 17

assignment as part of the parallel contract for updated Geospatial Electrification Planning and will only be available later in 2014.

44. The review and prioritization of all small hydro in the study will include very many schemes, despite only covering a part of Indonesia3. The review will thus have to be step-wise in which gradual screening is conducted as the review becomes more advanced. Site visits are only expected for a few sites. The Vendor shall in their Technical Proposal describe in detail how the screening and review process is planned to be done.

45. The review and prioritization of small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi shall result in a list of most promising small hydro to be developed to support electrification in these provinces. The Vendor shall give recommendations for further preparation studies, investigation and monitoring to support the development of these prioritized schemes. The Vendor shall use this latest data to update the national GIS database on small hydro potential.

REPORTING AND ACTIVITY 1 WORKSHOP

46. The Vendor shall summarize the methods and results of the country-wide resource maps for small hydro into a draft Small Hydro Mapping Report. The report shall include maps created from GIS layers, and shall present existing information on small hydro in Indonesia. The methodology and results shall be presented in a transparent way.

47. As a separate report or an annex to the above Small Hydro Mapping Report, the Vendor shall document the detailed review and update of small hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi.

48. The draft Activity 2 reports shall be ready and distributed at least two weeks ahead of a workshop to be held at the conclusion of Activity 2. The delivery shall have the format of stand-alone reports, slide pack, and relevant GIS layers. It shall be delivered in electronic format suitable for print and web publication.

49. Once draft Activity 1 outputs have been submitted and approved by the WB, the Vendor shall participate in a workshop held in Jakarta to present the results to the Client, get feedback from stakeholders, discuss next steps, and an introductory training in the use of the GIS tool for PLN staff. The Vendor’s Technical Proposal shall propose a format for this event. The Vendor should assume in their proposal that the Client and/or the WB will host the event, including provision of meeting room space, logistics, translation and sending of invitations. The Vendor’s proposal shall include the cost of their participation in this workshop including delivery of the training components.

50. Based on the feedback from the Workshop, the Vendor shall revise and finalize the Small Hydro Mapping Reports for approval by the WB in consultation with the Client.

3 As an indication for bidders on the number of gross sites for the study area, the 1999 Hydropower Master Plan

lists 31 sites in Sulawesi, 29 sites in Maluku, and 97 sites in NTT with estimated capacity below 10 MW.


Page 11 of 17

ACTIVITY 2: SUPPORT TO THE INCLUSION OF SMALL HYDRO POTENTIAL TO THE GEOSPATIAL

ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING FOR NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI

51. The Vendor should coordinate with the parallel contract on Geospatial Electrification Planning. The latest tool version shall be reviewed in regard to including generation sources from small hydro. If found motivated, suggestions should be given on improvements in the tool configuration and algorithms to include small hydro potential. Such possible improvements shall be discussed, introduced and tested in liaison with the contractor for the Geospatial Electrification Planning.

52. The Vendor shall, based on the results of Activity 1, provide of a list of potential small hydro to be fed into the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. The input data shall be in the form required by the Geospatial Electrification Tool.

53. During and after the Geospatial Electrification Tool, updated with small hydro potential, is applied to optimize electrification in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi, the Vendor shall work closely with the parallel project to review the interim and final results from a hydro generation point of view.

54. The Vendor shall further coordinate the final reporting of conducted work with the parallel contract to assure that the WB and the Client receives a complete description of the Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning process in Indonesia. The final report shall include policy recommendations on development of small hydro in Indonesia, based on the results and experience of the assignment.

55. The Vendor shall participate and contribute to a final workshop in Jakarta to present the final results for the Client and stakeholders. After the workshop the Final Reports shall be produced and delivered. The Vendor should assume in their proposal that the Client and/or the WB will host the event, including provision of meeting room space, logistics, translation and sending of invitations. The Vendor’s proposal shall include the cost of their participation in this workshop including delivery of presentations of results.

OPTIONAL: TRAINING IN GIS AND SMALL HYDRO MAPPING AND VALIDATION

56. The Vendor shall as optional services propose capacity building of PLN to host, operate, maintain and expand the national GIS database on small hydro, which will be produced in this assignment. This will include provision of GIS hardware and software, training in its use and maintenance, and updating with new information including digitizing. Training may be for PLN staff based in the central office in Jakarta and in local wilayahs.

57. The Vendor shall also as optional services propose capacity building to PLN in the mapping and validation of small hydro for both grid connection and isolated systems. This should include training in the map studies and the key characteristics and risks with small hydro development. The training should be customized for Indonesian conditions and take into account the role of small hydro in grid-based and isolated systems.

58. The Vendor shall, if interested in providing the optional services, describe in the Technical Proposal a proposed methodology and format for training, including necessary equipment and software,


Page 12 of 17

training material, workshops, on-the-job-training, etc.

59. The accompanied Financial Proposal, which will not be part of the evaluation of the bids, should as far as possible be based on unit rates to enable negotiation of final scope and volume of the services when available budget is known.

3. DELIVERABLES / SPECIFIC OUTPUTS EXPECTED FROM VENDOR 60. All deliverables shall be written in English and presented to the WB and the Client in electronic

format suitable for online publication unless otherwise specified. Should the WB decide to print any of the outputs then this will be handled separately.

61. The main users of the deliverables are PLN, other governmental institutions, and private investors in small hydropower.

ACTIVITY 1 DELIVERABLES

62. During Activity 1 the Vendor shall deliver the following:

a) Inception Report on the pre-diagnostic of small hydro in Indonesia including detailed methodology

b) A national small hydro resource database with statistics and relevant GIS. The GIS data should follow the guidelines described in Annex A.

c) Small Hydro Mapping Report outlining national information on small hydro in Indonesia, including maps of existing, planned and potential schemes.

d) A report/annex on small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi for both grid expansion and isolated systems.

e) Inputs to the Activity 1 Workshop to be held in Jakarta, including introductory training in the small hydro GIS database.

f) A list of prioritized small hydro development sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi, including recommendations for further studies, investigation and monitoring to support the development of these schemes.

ACTIVITY 2 DELIVERABLES

63. During Activity 2 the Vendor shall deliver the following:

g) Recommendations on improvement of the existing Geospatial Electrification Planning tool to take into account small hydro potential.

h) Input data on small hydro potential for the least cost geospatial electrification planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi.

i) Updated final reporting coordinated with the parallel contract to give a complete description of the Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning process in


Page 13 of 17

Indonesia.

j) Inputs to the Final Workshop to be held in Jakarta to present the results to the Client.

ANTICIPATED TIMELINE

64. The contract period for the Services is anticipated to be 22 months . It is anticipated to require 140 person weeks, of which approximately half is expected from associated local consultants.

65. If the Vendor feels that the timeline proposed above is unrealistic, or that meeting it will substantially increase costs, then they should propose an alternative timeline in their Technical Proposal and/or note any constraints on their side.

4. REQUIRED EXPERTISE OF VENDOR 66. The Vendor must present a multi-disciplinary team to provide services in accordance with these

TOR. Because of the importance of local knowledge and the language challenges, it is required that the Vendor joins with a local partner firm to conduct the services.

67. The Vendor shall have the following key experts and team composition, which will be part of the technical evaluation.

a. An experienced Team Leader with at least 15 years of hydropower planning and preparation, and with experience of small scale hydro development.

b. A deputy Team Leader with at least 10 years of experience of power and hydropower development in Indonesia.

c. A civil engineer with at least 10 years of experience in hydropower development

d. An engineering geologist with at least 10 years of experience in hydropower development, and preferably experience in Indonesia.

e. A hydrology and sediment expert with at least 10 years of experience in hydropower

Activity Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

Inception Phase

Development and population of small hydro database

Updated gross list of small hydro in NTT, Maluku and Sulawesi

Review and validation of gross list

Re-assessment of gross list for support to isolated systems

Updated prioritized list

Reporting and Workshop

SUPPORT TO GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING

Review of existing tool and input for NTT, Maluku and Sualwesi

Review of results for eletrification planning in NTT, Maluku and Sulawesi

Final reporting and final Workshop to present results

Extended digitizing of electrification grid systems in Sulawesi

Improved Geospatial Electrification tool

Updated Electrification Planning for NTT, Maluku and Sulawesi

Final Workshop to present results and Final Report

ACTIVITY 1

ACTIVITY 2

PARALLEL CONTRACT ON GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING

Indonesia Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning2014 2015


Page 14 of 17

development, and preferably experience in Indonesia.

f. A Power System Engineer with at least 10 years of experience in planning of power systems.

g. A GIS expert with at least 10 years of experience in building up GIS-based databases, preferably with experience from the power sector.

h. An environmental and social expert with at least 10 years of hydropower development, and preferably experience in Indonesia.

i. A local support team for data and information compilation, experienced in the power sector of Indonesia.

5. SPECIFIC INPUTS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE WORLD BANK 68. The WB and the Client will facilitate links to local agencies or other organizations for obtaining

historical hydrological data and documentation for any previous ground-based measurements, to be provided at no cost where possible.

69. Central data repository and geo-portal for the long-term storage and access of all data and GIS layers generated under this project.

70. Guidance on the accepted political boundaries between Indonesia and neighboring countries.

6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS / SPECIFIC CRITERIA 71. The evaluation of proposals will be conducted according to an 80:20 split between the Technical and

Financial Proposals.

72. Technical Proposals will be evaluated against three criteria, as follows:

i) The methodology, broken down into the activities that come under this RFP, and assessed according to methodological rigor, the appropriate sequencing of activities, the comprehensiveness of the approach with regard to quality standards, and the value added in terms of innovative approaches and/or improvements to the TOR. [40%]

ii) The Vendor’s proposed team, assessed according to their combined and individual experience, the strength of their identified local partner(s), and appropriate balance between roles and use of senior/junior and international/local staff. [40%]

iii) The comprehensiveness of the capacity building plan and training activities, proposed plan for engagement with Client and external stakeholders, and the flexibility of the Vendor in being willing and able to respond to changes during implementation. [20%]

73. The Vendor shall provide a Financial Proposal that conforms to the terms of the existing Indefinite Delivery Agreement (Framework Contract), and includes:

A fixed cost offer for the services as specified in the Scope of Work, broken down by deliverables.


Page 15 of 17

A fixed cost offer for any deliverables that are not listed in these TOR but that are being proposed by the Vendor in their Technical Proposal as optional additions to the Scope of Work. Any optional/additional deliverables shall be offered on a fixed cost basis and would be agreed upon in the contract negotiation phase or during project implementation.

A breakdown of personnel costs and estimated reimbursable expenses.

A proposed payment schedule against major milestones/deliverables, following an initial payment of 10% of the total on contract signing.

74. The Vendor is required to use the special template provided for their Financial Proposal (FINANCIAL PROPOSAL – Indonesia – Small Hydro Mapping Component A [Selection #1125330]) and disregard the standard ‘Financial Proposal Template’4. The Vendor shall provide their offer in the currency specified in their Indefinite Delivery Agreement, and alter the Financial Proposal accordingly.

75. All travel charged by the Vendor shall be for economy class flights via the most direct route; WB negotiated rates for hotel accommodation shall be used where possible5. All travel and subsistence shall be treated as a reimbursable expense but the Vendor shall provide estimated costs in their Financial Proposal and include this in their fixed price offer.

4 The correct document can be identified by the ESMAP logo in the top left hand corner.

5 Vendors shall base their calculations on the current rates as follows: $170/night for Jakarta, $72/night for all

other locations.


Page 16 of 17

ANNEX A: REQUIREMENTS FOR DATA, MAPS AND IMAGES

NON-GEOGRAPHIC DATA

All non-geographic data shall be made available in the following data formats for upload to a data repository, most likely via an Application Programming Interface (API) provided by the WB:

.csv (csv output from an excel file or see rfc 4180 for standard format)

.xls (Excel 97 and later)

.xlsx (2007 and later)

.tsv

GEOGRAPHIC DATA

All geographic data shall be delivered as shapefiles, file geodatabases, or other accepted OGC standard geographic formats. See http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards for a list of accepted formats. Preferred formats are shapefiles for vector data, and GeoTiff for raster data. See table below for some further details:

DATASET FORMAT SPATIAL REFERENCE

Vector Shapefile Geographic Coordinate System: GCS_WGS_1984

Datum: D_WGS_1984

Prime Meridian: Greenwich

Angular Unit: Degree

Raster Tiff, Grids, or Imagine Geographic Coordinate System: GCS_WGS_1984

Datum: D_WGS_1984

Prime Meridian: Greenwich

Angular Unit: Degree

Tabular .csv, .dbf or .xls XY coordinates must be in Decimal Degrees

All files pertaining to the map creation, such as .mxd or .ai files shall be included in the delivery of the GIS data.

In addition to the format requirements, all geographic data provided must be accompanied by detailed metadata as outlined in Annex A. The WB metadata standards are based on ISO 19115:2003 (Geographic Metadata Standards).

IMAGES

Mapping and other images shall be supplied with a 300 dpi density and lossless compression (PNG), suitable for professional printing. Mapping images will be reviewed by the World Bank’s GIS team before

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4180

http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards


Page 17 of 17

going to publication to ensure cartographic quality and content. Images may be used by the World Bank for communications purposes.

All photos shall be delivered in their original high-resolution format (raw or .jpg), preferably exif-tagged with GPS and timestamp.

GESTO ENERGIA S.A.



T. +351 211 579 899

F. +351 211 540 900

www.gestoenergy.com



INDONESIA

INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX II

MEETING REPORTS

July 2014

Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning

Indonesia Project ID: P145273


1

Meeting Report

Subject: Presentation meeting with PLN Head of New

and Renewable Energy Division

Ref.: ID.2014.AC.001.0

Number of pages: 1

Drafted by: Joana Santos

Date: March 25, 2014

Time: from 17h00 to 18h00

Local: PLN Pusat, Jl Trunojoyo Blok

M 1/135, Kebayoran Baru - 13th

floor, Jakarta

Participants:

Mr. Moch. Sofyan (PLN)

Mr. Sutiyo Siswanto (PLN)

Mr. Dhruva Sahai (WB)

Mr. Jorge André (GESTO)

Ms. Joana Santos (GESTO)

Agenda:

1. Brief team and project presentation

2. Designation of the expected team counterpart

3. First interaction to approach client’s needs and impressions on small hydropower

mapping

4. Schedule of follow-up comprehensive kick-off meeting

Key notes:

The client will be PLN’s New and Renewable Energy Division and The World Bank

Mr. Sutiyo Siswanto will be the liaison counterpart of GESTO team in the project. The

work will be approved by Mr. Moch. Sofyan

The capacity limit of small hydropower in the regulatory framework in Indonesia is 10

MW. The bounds on the scope of the study should be further discussed

A more in-depth presentation of the project was scheduled to March 27

Collected data:

No data was collected

Next steps Task Responsible Date

- - -




1

Meeting Report

Subject: Kick-off meeting with PLN New and Renewable

Energy Division

Ref.: ID.2014.AC.002.0

Number of pages: 3


Date: March 28, 2014




floor, Jakarta

Participants:

Mr. Moch. Sofyan (PLN)



Mr. Dhani Irwanto (IHC)

Mr. Chandra Adriawan (IHC)



Agenda:

1. Consortium presentation

2. ESMAP Framework for Small Hydropower

3. Methodology

4. Team and calendar

5. Next steps

Key notes:

Mr. Jorge André carried out the presentation of the project, detailing the methodology

to be worked out during the inception phase to meet PLN requirements

According to PLN, there is already some identified potential, but mainly on large hydro

PLN will provide studies on small hydropower (list of projects). GESTO will request the

information, along with other identified datasets

PLN is interested in a screening process to apply to their current small hydropower

requests, for which Mr. Sofyan gave some screening examples

PLN will establish an Internal Basic Communication regarding the project. This will

allow for the elaboration of a roadmap of other PLN divisions to be contacted

PLN will define a Team Counterpart to support the project

GESTO will require PLN’s assistance to contact external governmental

agencies/institutions relevant to the project, such as:

i. Ministry of Forestry




2

Meeting Report

ii. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources

iii. Ministry of Public Works

iv. Indonesia Agency for Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysics (BMKG)

v. BIG

A presentation letter should be prepared by PLN for GESTO’s use

Regarding BIG information, PLN already has part of the datasets acquired for the

parallel contract on the Geospatial Electrification Planning Tool. The same information

is required by GESTO, which will follow the usual confidentiality and data protection

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) used by PLN for this purpose

PLN would like the proposed training within the project to be included in PLN’s

Renewable Academy Training

The inclusion of small hydropower potential on existing dams (for non-hydropower

purposes) was suggested by PLN. GESTO thinks it is feasible within the project if agreed

by The World Bank

GESTO will need to carry out an assessment of PLN’s current GIS capabilities regarding

software use, hosting capacity and proficiency of users

Mr. Siswanto will be out of Jakarta during the week of April 1. GESTO will need his

diligences and guidance for the first steps of the project. A meeting should be schedule

upon his return to Jakarta. During the week of April 1 GESTO will proceed to the

meetings with Foreign Agencies (JICA, USAID, ADB, …)

Collected data:



File sending – Project presentation GESTO April 1

Data and info request GESTO April 1

New Meeting request GESTO Week April 7

Contacting Foreign Agencies relevant to the project GESTO April 1

Contacting external governmental agencies/institutions relevant to the project upon

receipt of Project Presentation Letter

GESTO TBD

Assessment of PLN’s current GIS capabilities GESTO Week April 7

Establishment of Internal Basic Communication PLN Week April 1

Definition of PLN’s Team Counterpart to support the project

PLN Week April 1

Provision of data/info/studies on small hydropower (list of projects, hydropower masterplans, etc.)

PLN Week April 7




3


Preparation of Project Presentation Letter and assistance contacting external agencies

PLN Week April 1

MoU for the provision of BIG data acquired by PLN for GESTO’s use

PLN/GESTO Week April 7

Grant GESTO access to PLN’s IT, New Energies and System Planning GIS users for the assessment of PLN’s

current GIS capabilities

PLN Week April 7




1

Meeting Report

Subject: Meeting with USAD ICED

Ref.: ID.2014.AC.003.0

Number of pages: 2


Date: April 2, 2014


Local: Tifa Building, Suite 504

Jalan Kuningan Barat 26

Jakarta Selatan 12710 Indonesia

Participants:

Mr. Bill Meade (USAID ICED)

Mr. Farid Siregar (USAID ICED)

Mr. Raymond Bona (USAID ICED)



Agenda:

1. Small Hydropower Mapping project presentation

2. USAID ICED project presentation on hydropower mapping and project development

3. Assessment of the possible points of cooperation

Key notes:

Mr. Bill Meade made a brief introduction to the work being carried out by USAID-ICED

Mr. Jorge André carried out the presentation of the project, detailing the methodology

to be worked out during the inception phase to meet PLN requirements

Mr. Farid Siregar made a presentation of the hydropower validation USAID – ICED is

currently performing. He mentioned that ASTER Digital Elevation Model for Indonesia

is accurate enough for preliminary studies.

Mr. Raymond Bona presented the actual licensing process flow chart

Mr. Bill Meade identified some consequences of the actual licensing process – very

competitive, but a project with a PPA doesn’t mean a feasible project. As an outcome,

there are several IPP requests and granted PPA’s. Some of the PPA’s may never be

built and block other feasible projects. Moreover, because of competitiveness,

confidentiality is required in the project development. As a consequence, PLN only

gets to know the location of those projects when the PPA is requested. Moreover, the

PPA is conceded for 20 years, but the local permit has no expiration date.

USAID-ICED is open to share info with the ESMAP initiative but a formal request has to

be made between ESMPA and USAID.




2

Meeting Report

Collected data:



File sending – Project presentations GESTO and USAID ICED

Week April 1

Request WB/ESMAP a letter for cooperation between the two agencies (WB and USAID) in order to request

USAID public information GESTO Week April 7

Inform PLN of data sharing between Tetratech and GESTO

GESTO Week April 7




1

Meeting Report

Subject: Meeting with ADB-ICED

Ref.: ID.2014.AC.004.0

Number of pages: 1


Date: April 3, 2014


Local: Gedung BRI II, 7th Floor, Jl. Jend. Sudirman

Kav. 44-46, Jakarta 10210, Indonesia

Participants:

Mr. Bagus Mudiantoro (ADB)

Mrs. Joy Lopes (ADB)




Agenda:

1. Small hydropower mapping project presentation

2. Assess ADB work on hydropower

Key notes:

Mr. Jorge André made a brief introduction to the project

Ms. Joana Santos carried out the presentation of the project, referring the

methodology and highlighting the expected results (GIS database and list of most

promising sites)

Mr. Bagus Mundiantoro made some considerations regarding ADB’s projects and

referred ADB has some projects in operation in Sulawesi and NTT and mentioned some

of the difficulties (forestry, possible conflict with other PPAs, …)

Mr. Bagus Mundiantoro mentioned that the reference cost per MW on the developed

hydro projects is close to $4M/MW

GESTO will request the information to ADB related to their projects

Collected data:



File sending – Project presentation GESTO April 4

Request of data/info/studies on small hydropower (list of projects, studies, costs etc.)

GESTO April 4




1

Meeting Report

Subject: Work Meeting with PLN

Ref.: ID.2014.AC.005.0

Number of pages: 2


Date: April 7, 2014




floor, Jakarta

Participants:


Mr. Rois Ahmad Anafi (PLN)





Agenda:

1. Status report

2. Operation of the data collection task

Key notes:

Mr. Jorge André made a brief Status report on the inception mission, referring the

meetings held during the previous week (USAID-ICED, ADB), pointing out that the main

source of information is PLN. In summary, the basic communication and a focal point is

essential at this stage. The database that PLN currently works needs to be assessed, as

well as the current GIS and database capabilities

Mr. Siswanto invited Mr. Rois Ahmad Anafi to the meeting, as the person responsible

for the update of the current database. Mr. Rois will be the person who may explain

the contents and the current procedures

Mr. Siswanto and Mr. Anafi explained that the database actually has around 800 MW

on more than 200 sites. The database has some points with coordinates.

The IPP requests on the database are analyzed taking into consideration the potential

of the stream. The potential is nowadays assessed by the JICA studies (1999 and 2011).

The JICA studies has 349 locations, of which 167 locations pass the 1st screening, to a

total of 21 480 MW. In the 3rd screening process only 89 locations were left. Those 89

locations where updated in the 2011 study. The consulting engineering company that

developed the studies was Nipon KOEI.

Data regarding the energy output of operating hydropower schemes is under the




2

Meeting Report

Operation Director, probably in the regional areas. This information was requested by

GESTO

In the end of the meeting, GESTO had the opportunity to see the hydropower database

and the mapinfo database, shown by Mr. Anafi. GESTO inquired about the process of

accepting a request, which was explained Mr. Buddhi, that joined the discussion by

suggestion of Mr. Anafi.

GESTO will be at PLN the next day to continue the operationalization of all the data

collection

Collected data:



Provide GESTO the database of IPP requests and PLN studies (subject to superior approval)

Mr. Siswanto Week April 7

Provide GESTO the Mapinfo database with the JICA study (subject to superior approval)


Check PLN’s capabilities within the IT department or appoint meeting.


Provide GESTO the information on the monthly energy output and related monthly capacity of the

hydropower plant or appoint meeting Mr. Siswanto Week April 7

Facilitate GESTO’s access to other public stakeholders (Ministry of Public Works, Ministry of Energy and

Ministry of Forestry) Mr. Siswanto Week April 7

Inform GESTO of existing non-hydropower dams to be included in the study


Request the System Planning the BIG data used in the parallel contract (Earth Institute – GEP tool)

Mr. Jorge André and Mr. Dhruva

Sahai Week April 7




1

Meeting Report

Subject: Meeting with JICA

Ref.: ID.2014.AC.006.0

Number of pages: 2


Date: April 7, 2014


Local: JICA Indonesia Office

Sentral Senayan II, 14th floor

Jl Asia Afrika No. 8

Jakarta 10270

Participants:

Mr. Juraku Masahiro (JICA)




Agenda:

1. Small hydropower mapping project presentation

2. Assess JICA work on hydropower

Key notes:

Mr. Jorge André made a brief introduction to the project and carried out the

presentation of the project, referring the methodology and highlighting the expected

results (GIS database and list of most promising sites);

Mr. Jorge André referred that up to this date the most comprehensive study of

hydropower in Indonesia was funded by JICA, which GESTO had the opportunity to

assess in PLN Pusat (both the hardcopy and the database from the study of 1999). The

study was updated in 2011. Mr. Jorge André asked if it would be possible to have

softcopies of both of the studies;

Mr. Juraku Masahiro referred that the 2011 study is available in JICA online library. The

links will be sent. About the study from 1999, Mr. Juraku Masahiro will inquire about

the softcopy availability. The studies were developed by NIPON KOEI

Currently, JICA is developing individual projects: transmission lines, clean coal projects,

large and small hydropower plants. Regarding SHPP, there are 2 t o3 candidate

projects, all in Sumatra. Some of those projects already have the PPA waiting for

financial close;

Mr. Juraku Masahiro referred that if the results of the project “Small Hydropower

Mapping in Indonesia” were made public, it could allow a better cooperation with the

private sector.




2

Meeting Report

Collected data:



File sending – Project presentation Mr. Jorge André Week April 7

File sending – Hydropower Master Plan (1999 and 2011)

Mr. Juraku Masahiro

Week April 7




1

Meeting Report

Subject: Meeting with GIZ

Ref.: ID.2014.AC.007.0

Number of pages: 2

Drafted by: Jorge André

Date: April 8, 2014


Local: GIZ/EnDev Indonesia MHP Technical Support Unit Office

Jakarta

Jl. Tebet Barat VIII No. 52

Jakarta Selatan 12810

Participants:

Ms. Amalia Suryani (GIZ)

Ms. Erwina Darmajanti (GIZ)

Mr. Ricky Ariwibowo (GIZ)



Agenda:

1. Consortium presentation

2. ESMAP Framework for Small Hydropower

3. Methodology

4. Calendar

5. Present day

Key notes:

Mr. Jorge André made a brief introduction to the project and carried out the

presentation of the project, referring the methodology and highlighting the expected

results (GIS database and list of most promising sites);

Mr. Jorge André explained that ESMAP’s Small Hydropower Mapping Project is

currently under its Inception Phase and therefore it is important to speak with as many

relevant stakeholders as possible. The main objective of this meeting is to assess

relevant info on hydropower in Indonesia and evaluate possible ways of cooperation.

The required info is centered on the following topics: development of the sector,

current projects, list of projects existing GIS datasets, existing hydro data and lessons

learnt;

Mr. Jorge André mentioned that even though the focus of ESMAP’s project is small

hydro (typically between 1 and 10 MW in capacity), other ranges of hydropower

projects will be extremely welcome on the database creation. Ms. Amalia Suryani

replied that GIZ projects currently range from 5 to 200 kW;




2

Meeting Report

Ms. Amalia Suryani was interested in knowing how the beneficiary and choice of

provinces to detail the project was chosen;

Ms. Amalia Suryani mentioned that GIZ mainly provides technically support after

commissioning and most projects are funded by the Government (through the

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, their counterpart) also other programs by

other ministries and the projects locally funded by the community. This support

comprises technical review, training plant operators and managers, and monitoring.

The projects themselves are not owned by GIZ;

Ms. Amalia Suryani stated that GIZ has been supporting 297 small scale projects, of

which 185 are micro hydro and the rest are PV mini-grids. Currently in the pipeline

there are over 100 MHP and 119 PV mini-grids to be supported. Mr. Ricky Ariwibowo

stated that GIZ is currently developing a web database (with interactive presentation

called RE-MAP) with these projects, though not in GIS format (using MapFactor), that

should be available by the end of the month;

Mr. Jorge André concluded requesting the possibility to include the GIZ database on

ESMAP’s project.

GIZ will first internally discuss this request.

Collected data:



File sending – Project presentation Mr. Jorge André April 8

Evaluate possible provision of GIZ database on micro hydro for incorporation in ESMAP’s database

GIZ April

Inform GESTO of the publishing of RE-MAP’s website GIZ asap

GESTO ENERGIA S.A.



T. +351 211 579 899

F. +351 211 540 900

www.gestoenergy.com



INDONESIA

INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX III

DATA AND INFO REQUIREMENTS

July 2014




1

DATA AND INFO REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING PROJECT:

SMALL HYDROPOWER DATABASE (in order of priority)

All available Hydropower Masterplans (or Project Identification Studies)

List and characteristics1 of hydropower plants including (but not limited to):

o PLN’s internal reference ID

o Exact location (latitude, longitude and system of coordinates)

o Administrative setting (island, province, district, …)

o Status of the project (existing, under construction, new or future)

o Ownership of the project (PLN or IPP’s)

o Type of existing studies for the site (Masterplans, pre-feasibility,

feasibility study, design studies, …)

o Hydrological info (river, main river basin, mean annual flow,

existence of stream gauge stations)

o Energetic features (capacity, mean annual generation output, mean

annual hours of output, …)

o Transmission and distribution features (type of grid connection,

population to supply, demand forecast for the region, …)

o Scheme features (type and dimensions of dam, type of powerplant,

channel/penstock dimensions, type of storage, …)

o Technical features (head, design flow, ecological flow, number of

groups, mean water level, intake level, outtake level, storage,

submerged area, …)

o Financial and economical features (estimated investment costs,

Levelized Costs of Electricity, IRR, existing tariff, O&M costs, …)

The above is a tentative list, subject to customization with PLN’s current

database

Temporal datasets and corresponding data at PLN’s database:

o Stream gauge stations (runoff/flow)

o Meteorological stations (rainfall and temperature)

Spatial datasets (shapefiles or maps):

o Electrical grid (from 20 kV upwards)

o Protected areas and forestry

o Land use

o Road and Railways network

o Available Isohyet and isotherm

o Property of land (stated owned/private sector)

1 For instance on the form of an excel spreadsheet and/or shapefile or .kmz




2

Legal Framework:

o Environmental legislation to be taken into consideration

o Hydropower licensing process description

o Major issues/concerns/gaps that the Division has identified in the

small hydropower development

GIS CAPABILITIES

GIS capabilities shall be assessed at two levels within PLN’s organization – vertically

at the Information Technology Department (IT) and horizontally at two Divisions – New

Energy and System Planning:

IT Department:

Servers characteristics and hosting and storage availability

Existence of IT personnel experienced in databases for geographical

information data

Representative examples of the hardware used by the users

New Energy and System Planning Divisions:

Approximated number of people currently using geospatial information –

(kml, kmz, shapefiles, geodatabases) or geospatial software (google earth,

arcgis, quantum gis, mapinfo, small world …)

Skills and previous training of the users

Representative examples of the hardware used by the users




1

DATA AND INFO REQUIREMENTS FROM OTHER INSTITUTIONS (PRIORITY INFO):

FROM DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES (MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS)

List and characteristics1 of existing dams (but not limited to):

o Exact location (latitude, longitude and system of coordinates)

o Administrative setting (island, province, district, …)

o Status of the project (existing, under construction, new or future)

o Ownership of the project

o Hydrological info (river, main river basin, mean annual flow,

existence of stream gauge stations)

o Energetic features (capacity, mean annual generation output, mean

annual hours of output, …)

o Transmission and distribution features (type of grid connection,

population to supply, demand forecast for the region, …)

o Scheme features (type and dimensions of dam, type of storage, …)

o Technical features (head, design flow, ecological flow, mean water

level, intake level, outtake level, storage, submerged area, historical

monthly data of water level and water consumption, …)

The above is a tentative list

Temporal datasets:

o Stream gauge stations (runoff/flow) - daily and monthly series

Legal Framework:

o Environmental legislation to be taken into consideration

o Dam licensing process description

FROM BADAN INFORMASI GEOSPASIAL (BIG)

DATA FOR THE REGIONS OF NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA AND SULAWESI

Vector format:

o Contour data

o Streams and rivers

o Administrative boundaries

o Settlements and population

Raster format:

o Topographic maps

1 For instance on the form of an excel spreadsheet and/or shapefile or .kmz

GESTO ENERGIA S.A.



T. +351 211 579 899

F. +351 211 540 900

www.gestoenergy.com



INDONESIA

INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX IV

HYDROPOWER PLANTS IN OPERATION

July 2014


INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV

ID.2014.R001.0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF HYDROPOWER PLANTS IN OPERATION IN RUPTL ......................................................................................................... 1

HYDROPOWER PLANTS IN OPERATION IN RUPTL MAPS ........................................................................................................... 5

INDONESIA HYDROPOWER ........................................................................................................................................................... 7

JAWA-BALI REGION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9

BANTEN PROVINCE ................................................................................................................................................................ 10

JAWA BARAT PROVINCE ........................................................................................................................................................ 11

JAWA TENGAH PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................................... 12

JAWA TIMUR PROVINCE ........................................................................................................................................................ 13

KALIMANTAN REGION ................................................................................................................................................................ 15

KALIMANTAN BARAT PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................ 16

KALIMANTAN SELATAN PROVINCE ........................................................................................................................................ 17

NUSA TENGGARA REGION .......................................................................................................................................................... 19

NUSA TENGGARA BARAT PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................... 20

NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................... 21

PAPUA REGION ........................................................................................................................................................................... 23

PAPUA PROVINCE .................................................................................................................................................................. 24

SULAWESI REGION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 25

GORONTALO PROVINCE......................................................................................................................................................... 26

SULAWESI BARAT PROVINCE ................................................................................................................................................. 27

SULAWESI SELATAN PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................. 28

SULAWESI TENGAH PROVINCE .............................................................................................................................................. 29

SULAWESI TENGGARA PROVINCE .......................................................................................................................................... 30

SULAWESI UTARA PROVINCE ................................................................................................................................................. 31

SUMATERA REGION .................................................................................................................................................................... 33

ACEH PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 34

BENGKULU PROVINCE ........................................................................................................................................................... 35

LAMPUNG PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................................ 36

RIAU PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 37

SUMATERA BARAT PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................... 38

SUMATERA SELATAN PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................ 39

SUMATERA UTARA PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................... 40



1 ID.2014.R001.0

List of hydropower plants in operation in RUPTL



3 ID.2014.R001.0

Table 1 - List of hydropower plants in operation in RUPTL.

Province Name Type Capacity (MW)

Bengkulu Lebong # 1 PLTA 4,0



Bengkulu Musi # 1 PLTA 71,0



Bengkulu Tess # 1 PLTA 0,6






Bengkulu Tess Extention PLTA 4,4

Jawa Barat Bengkok PLTA 3,2

Jawa Barat Cikalong PLTA 19,2

Jawa Barat Cirata PLTA 1008,0

Jawa Barat Dago PLTA 0,7

Jawa Barat Jatiluhur PLTA 150,0

Jawa Barat Kracak PLTA 18,9

Jawa Barat Lamajan PLTA 19,6

Jawa Barat Parakan PLTA 9,9

Jawa Barat Plengan PLTA 6,9

Jawa Barat Saguling PLTA 700,7

Jawa Barat Ubrug PLTA 18,4

Jawa Tengah Gerung PLTA 26,4

Jawa Tengah Jelok PLTA 20,5

Jawa Tengah Kedung Ombo PLTA 22,5

Jawa Tengah Ketenger PLTA 8,0

Jawa Tengah Lambu PLTA 1,2

Jawa Tengah Mrica PLTA 180,9

Jawa Tengah Pengkol PLTA 1,4

Jawa Tengah Selorejo PLTA 1,4

Jawa Tengah Sempor PLTA 1,0

Jawa Tengah Timo PLTA 12,0

Jawa Tengah Wadas Lintang PLTA 18,0

Jawa Tengah Wonogiri PLTA 12,4

Jawa Timur Karang Kates PLTA 105,0

Jawa Timur Ledoyo PLTA 4,5

Jawa Timur Madiun PLTA 8,1

Jawa Timur Mendalan PLTA 23,0

Jawa Timur Selorejo PLTA 4,5

Jawa Timur Sengguruh PLTA 29,0

Jawa Timur Siman PLTA 10,8

Jawa Timur Tulung Agung PLTA 36,0

Jawa Timur Wlingi PLTA 54,0

Kalimantan Barat Merasap System 2,0

Kalimantan Selatan Riam Kanan (Moh Noor) System 30

Lampung Batutegi # 1 PLTA 14,2

Lampung Batutegi # 2 PLTA 14,2

Lampung Besai # 1 PLTA 45,0



4

ID.2014.R001.0

Province Name Type Capacity (MW)

Lampung Besai # 2 PLTA 45,0

Riau Kotopanjang # 1 PLTA 38,0



Sulawesi Selatan Bakaru 1 PLTA 63,0

Sulawesi Selatan Bakaru 2 PLTA 63,0

Sulawesi Selatan Balla PLTM 0,7

Sulawesi Selatan Bili Bili PLTA 20,0

Sulawesi Selatan Kalukku PLTM 1,3

Sulawesi Selatan Malea PLTA 7,0

Sulawesi Selatan Poso 1 PLTA 65,0



Sulawesi Selatan Sawitto PLTM 1,0

Sulawesi Selatan Tangka Manipi PLTA 10,0

Sumatera Barat Batang Agam # 1 PLTA 3,5



Sumatera Barat Lubuk Gadang PLTMH 7,5

Sumatera Barat Mangani PLTMH 1,17

Sumatera Barat Maninjau # 1 PLTA 17,0




Sumatera Barat Napal Melintang PLTMH 0,58

Sumatera Barat Pinang Awan PLTMH 0,4

Sumatera Barat Salido Kecil PLTMH 0,3

Sumatera Barat Singkarak # 1 PLTA 43,8




Sumatera Utara Asahan I.1 PLTA 90,0

Sumatera Utara Asahan I.2 PLTA 90,0

Sumatera Utara Hutaraja PLTMH 5,0

Sumatera Utara INALUM PLTA 45,0

Sumatera Utara KARAI 13 PLTMH 5,0

Sumatera Utara Lau Renun #1 PLTA 41,0

Sumatera Utara Lau Renun #2 PLTA 41,0

Sumatera Utara Pandan PLTMH 7,6

Sumatera Utara Parlilitan PLTMH 7,5

Sumatera Utara Parluasan PLTMH 5,0

Sumatera Utara Sei Silau 2 PLTMH 8,0

Sumatera Utara Sipansihaporas #1 PLTA 33,0

Sumatera Utara Sipansihaporas #2 PLTA 17,0



5 ID.2014.R001.0

Hydropower plants in operation in RUPTL maps



7 ID.2014.R001.0

INDONESIA HYDROPOWER



9 ID.2014.R001.0

JAWA-BALI REGION



10

ID.2014.R001.0

BANTEN PROVINCE



11 ID.2014.R001.0

JAWA BARAT PROVINCE



12

ID.2014.R001.0

JAWA TENGAH PROVINCE



13 ID.2014.R001.0

JAWA TIMUR PROVINCE



14

ID.2014.R001.0



15 ID.2014.R001.0

KALIMANTAN REGION



16

ID.2014.R001.0

KALIMANTAN BARAT PROVINCE



17 ID.2014.R001.0

KALIMANTAN SELATAN PROVINCE



18

ID.2014.R001.0



19 ID.2014.R001.0

NUSA TENGGARA REGION



20

ID.2014.R001.0

NUSA TENGGARA BARAT PROVINCE



21 ID.2014.R001.0

NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR PROVINCE



22

ID.2014.R001.0



23 ID.2014.R001.0

PAPUA REGION



24

ID.2014.R001.0

PAPUA PROVINCE



25 ID.2014.R001.0

SULAWESI REGION



26

ID.2014.R001.0

GORONTALO PROVINCE



27 ID.2014.R001.0

SULAWESI BARAT PROVINCE



28

ID.2014.R001.0

SULAWESI SELATAN PROVINCE



29 ID.2014.R001.0

SULAWESI TENGAH PROVINCE



30

ID.2014.R001.0

SULAWESI TENGGARA PROVINCE



31 ID.2014.R001.0

SULAWESI UTARA PROVINCE



32

ID.2014.R001.0



33 ID.2014.R001.0

SUMATERA REGION



34

ID.2014.R001.0

ACEH PROVINCE



35 ID.2014.R001.0

BENGKULU PROVINCE



36

ID.2014.R001.0

LAMPUNG PROVINCE



37 ID.2014.R001.0

RIAU PROVINCE



38

ID.2014.R001.0

SUMATERA BARAT PROVINCE



39 ID.2014.R001.0

SUMATERA SELATAN PROVINCE



40

ID.2014.R001.0

SUMATERA UTARA PROVINCE

GESTO ENERGIA S.A.



T. +351 211 579 899

F. +351 211 540 900

www.gestoenergy.com



INDONESIA

INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX V

LIST OF HYDROPOWER PROJECTS IN RUPTL 2013-2022

July 2014


INCEPTION REPORT – Annex VI

i ID.2014.R001.0

List of Hydropower Projects in RUPTL 2013-2022



iii ID.2014.R001.0

Table 1 - List of Hydropower Projects in RUPTL 2013-2022.

Province Project Type Capacity (MW) Year of Operation

Aceh PLTM Tersebar Aceh PLTM 65.0 2014-2015-2016

Peusangan 1-2 PLTA 88.0 2017

Peusangan-4 (FTP2) PLTA 83.0 2020

Meurebo-2 PLTM 59.0 2020

Bali

Muara PLTM 1.0 2016

Telagawaja PLTM 4.0 2016

Sambangan PLTM 2.0 2016

Ayung PLTM 2.0 2017

Tukad Daya PLTM 8.0 2017

Sunduwati PLTM 2.0 2017

Telagawaja Ayu PLTM 1.0 2017

Banten Cisono PLTM 3.0 2014

Cikotok PLTM 4.0 2014

Situmulya PLTM 3.0 2014

Cikidang PLTM 2.0 2016

Cisimeut PLTM 2.0 2016

Cisungsang II PLTM 3.0 2016

Karang Ropong (Cibareno 1) PLTM 5.0 2016

Bulakan PLTM 10.0 2016

Cidano PLTM 2.0 2016

Cibareno PLTM 3.0 2017

Cisiih Leutik PLTM 4.0 2017

Nagajaya PLTM 6.0 2017

Bengkulu Kepla Curup (Barata) PLTMH 0.5 2013

Kepla Curup (Toshiba) PLTMH 1.0 2013

Ketahun-3 PLTA 61.0 2021

Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) Bayu Samas PLT 50.0 2015

Gorontalo Taludaa I PLTM 3.0 2015

Jambi Merangin PLTA 350.0 2021

Jawa Barat Cikaso PLTM 5.0 2013

Sindang Cai PLTM 1.0 2014

Cirompang PLTM 8.0 2014

Cianten 2 PLTM 5.0 2015

Cibatarua PLTM 5.0 2015


Cibalapulang PLTM 9.0 2015

Cilaki PLTM 7.0 2015

Cilaki 1B PLTM 10.0 2015

Cimandiri PLTM 3.0 2015

Pakenjeng Bawah PLTM 6.0 2015

Cikopo-2 PLTM 6.0 2015

Cicatih PLTM 6.0 2015

Cisanggiri PLTM 3.0 2016

Cijampang 1 PLTM 1.0 2016

Cibalapulang-2 PLTM 7.0 2016

Cibalapulang-3 PLTM 6.0 2016

Cikaniki 1 PLTM 3.0 2016

Cikaniki 2 PLTM 3.0 2016

Cilaki 1A PLTM 3.0 2016

Pakenjeng Atas PLTM 4.0 2016

Kalapa Nunggal PLTM 3.0 2016



iv ID.2014.R001.0


Jawa Barat Pusaka-1 PLTM 9.0 2016

Ciasem PLTM 3.0 2016

Cikaengan PLTM 3.0 2016

Pusaka-3 PLTM 3.0 2016

Cikandang PLTM 6.0 2016

Caringin PLTM 4.0 2016

Ciarinem PLTM 3.0 2016

Jatigede (FTP2) PLTA 55.0 2017

Jatigede (FTP2) PLTA 55.0 2017

Upper Cisokan Pump Storage (FTP2) PS 260.0 2017




Rajamandala PLTA 47.0 2017

Cianten 1B PLTM 6.0 2017


Cikaengan-2 PLTM 7.0 2017

Cikawung Bawah PLTM 3.0 2017

Cikawung Atas PLTM 5.0 2017

Cibuni PLTM 3.0 2017

Jawa Tengah Adipasir 3 PLTM 0.3 2013

KInc.ang PLTM 0.3 2013

Singgi PLTM 0.2 2013

Merden PLTM 0.4 2013

Kunci Putih PLTM 1.0 2014

Logawa Sunyalangu PLTM 1.5 2014

Banyubiru PLTM 0.2 2014

Logawa Baseh PLTM 3.0 2015

Banjaran Kebonmanis PLTM 2.2 2015

Logawa Babakan PLTM 1.3 2015

Logawa Baseh Karangpelem PLTM 1.9 2015

Palumbungan PLTM 1.6 2016

Gelang PLTM 0.3 2016

Bendosari PLTM 4.0 2016

Pugeran PLTM 6.0 2016

Adipasir 1 PLTM 0.3 2016

Adipasir 2 PLTM 0.3 2016

Ambal PLTM 2.1 2016

Banyumlayu PLTM 0.5 2016

Pagarpelah PLTM 3.2 2016

Serayu PLTM 8.6 2016

Gunung Wugul PLTM 3.0 2016

Timbangreja PLTM 0.4 2016

Preng-1 PLTM 1.8 2017

Preng-2 PLTM 4.5 2017

Tulis PLTM 9.0 2017

Harjosari PLTM 9.9 2017

Lambur PLTM 8.0 2017

Prukut Sambirata PLTM 1.5 2017

Dadapayam PLTM 3.0 2017

Binangun PLTM 3.8 2017

Jimat PLTM 0.5 2017

Damar PLTM 2.1 2017

Pageruyung PLTM 4.4 2017



v ID.2014.R001.0


Jawa Tengah Matenggeng PS PS 225.0 2020

Matenggeng PS PS 225.0 2020



Jawa Timur Pacet PLTM 2.0 2016

Lodoyo PLTM 10.0 2017

Jompo 1 (Jompo Atas) PLTM 2.0 2017

Jompo 2 (Jompo Bawah) PLTM 3.0 2017

Kali Tengah (Sungai Tengah) PLTM 1.0 2017

Balelo PLTM 4.0 2017

Ketajek PLTM 3.0 2017

Zeelandia PLTM 2.0 2017

Karangkates #4-5 PLTA 100.0 2019

Kalikonto-2 PLTA 62.0 2019

Kesamben PLTA 37.0 2019

Kalimantan Barat Nanga Pinoh PLTA 98.0 2022

Pade Kembayung PLTA 30.0 2022

Kalimantan Selatan Kusan PLTA 65.0 2022

Kalimantan Timur Kelai PLTA 55.0 2022

Lampung Semangka (FTP2) PLTA 56.0 2017

Maluku Wai Tina PLTM 8.0 2016/17

Sapalewa PLTM 8.0 2016/17

Nua (Masohi) PLTM 8.0 2017

Isal PLTM 8.0 2018/19

Wai Tala PLTA 54.0 2019/20

Tene PLTM 4.0 2016

Wae Mala PLTM 1.5 2017

Makariki PLTM 4.0 2017

Maluku Utara Maluku Utara Tersebar PLTM 5.0 2017/18

Nusa Tenggara Barat Santong PLTM 0.9 2013

PLTM Tersebar NTB PLTM 17.2 2013/14/15

Brang Beh 1 PLTA 12.0 2018

Brang Beh 2 PLTA 6.0 2019

PLTM Tersebar NTB PLTM 15.0 2016/17

Nusa Tenggara Timur Ndungga PLTM 1.9 2014

PLTM Tersebar NTT PLTM 3.4 2014/15

Wae Rancang I PLTA 10.0 2017

Wae Rancang II PLTA 6.5 2018

PLTM Tersebar NTT PLTM 9.2 2014/15/16

Papua Walesi 6,7 PLTM 0.6 2013

Orya/Genyem PLTA 20.0 2014

Sinagma 4,5 PLTM 0.4 2014

Baliem PLTA 50.0 2016/17/18

Biak PLTM 2.6 2017

Kalibumi II PLTM 5.0 2017/18

Orya 2 PLTA 10.0 2017

Kalibumi III Cascade PLTM 7.5 2018/19/20

Mariarotu I PLTM 1.3 2017

Walesi Blok II PLTM 6.0 2018

Mariarotu II PLTM 1.3 2018

Amai PLTM 1.4 2018

Papua Barat Prafi PLTM 2.5 2014

Kombemur PLTM 6.6 2014/15



vi ID.2014.R001.0


Papua Barat Prafi 2 PLTM 1.0 2016

Warsamson PLTA 46.5 2018/19

Waigo PLTM 1.0 2015

Ransiki PLTM 6.0 2016

Sulawesi Barat Karama Baseload (Unsolicited) PLTA 100.0 2020

Karama Peaking (Unsolicited) PLTA 350.0 2021

Poko PLTA 234.0 2020/21

Sulawesi Selatan PLTM Tersebar Sulsel PLTM 94.0 2014/15/16/17

Bonto Batu (FTP 2) PLTA 110.0 2019

Malea (FTP 2) PLTA 90.0 2020

Bakaru 2 PLTA 126.0 2020

Sulawesi Tengah Buleleng (APBN) PLTM 1.2 2016

Sakita PLTM 2.0 2014

PLTM Tersebar Sulteng PLTM 35.2 2014/15/16/17

Wawopada PLTM 6.5 2014/15

Lambangan PLTM 3.0 2014/15

Poro Kabalo PLTM 2.5 2017

Tomasa PLTM 10.0 2017/18

Yaentu PLTM 10.0 2017/18

Sawidago 3 PLTM 1.6 2016

Poso 2 PLTA 132.0 2021/22

Sulawesi Tenggara Rongi PLTM 0.8 2014

Lapai 1 (APBN) PLTM 4.0 2015

Lapai 2 (APBN) PLTM 4.0 2016

Konawe PLTA 50.0 2021

Watunohu PLTA 15.0 2021

Riorita PLTM 0.5 2015

Toaha PLTM 0.5 2015

Sulawesi Utara Duminanga PLTM 3.5 2017

Sawangan PLTA 12.0 2019

Poigar 2 PLTA 30.0 2019

Sumatera Barat Masang-2 (FTP2) PLTA 55.0 2020

Guntung PLM/MH 4.0 2015

Lubuk Sao II PLM/MH 2.6 2015

Bayang PLM/MH 4.5 2015

Tarusan PLM/MH 3.2 2015

Lintau 1 PLM/MH 9.0 2015

Gumanti-3 PLM/MH 6.5 2015

Induring PLM/MH 1.2 2015

Batang Sumpur PLM/MH 8.0 2016

Bukit Cubadak PLM/MH 9.2 2016

Patimah PLM/MH 2.8 2016

Sianok Duku PLM/MH 6.6 2016

laruang Gosan PLM/MH 4.0 2016

Siamang Bunyi PLM/MH 1.7 2016

Pinti Kayu PLM/MH 10.0 2016

Batang Anai PLM/MH 3.2 2016

Batang Sangir PLM/MH 10.0 2017

Hydro power PLM/MH 10.0 2017

Sangir 1 PLM/MH 10.0 2017

Sungai Garam Hydro PLM/MH 10.0 2017

Gunung Tujuh PLM/MH 8.0 2017

Tuik PLM/MH 6.4 2016

Muara Sako PLM/MH 3.0 2016



vii ID.2014.R001.0


Sumatera Barat Kerambil PLM/MH 1.4 2016

Gumanti 1 PLM/MH 4.0 2016

Batang Samo PLM/MH 7.0 2016

Alahan Panjang PLM/MH 3.0 2016

Kambahan PLM/MH 3.0 2016

Rabi Jonggor PLM/MH 9.5 2016

Sungai Aur PLM/MH 2.3 2016

Sikarbau PLM/MH 2.4 2016

Sumatera Utara PLTM Tersebar Sumut PLTM 96.0 2014-2016

Wampu (FTP2) PLTA 45.0 2015

Asahan III (FTP2) PLTA 174.0 2018

Hasang (FTP2) PLTA 40.0 2018

Simonggo-2 PLTA 90.0 2021

Kumbih-3 PLTA 42.0 2021

Sibundong-4 PLTA 32.0 2021

Batang Toru (Tapsel) PLTA 510.0 2022

GESTO ENERGIA S.A.



T. +351 211 579 899

F. +351 211 540 900

www.gestoenergy.com



INDONESIA

INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX VI

PROPOSED MoU

July 2014

1-10

NOTA KESEPAHAMAN

antara

PT PLN (PERSERO)

dan

GESTO ENERGY CONSULTING

tentang

PENGGUNAAN PETA DIGITAL WILAYAH NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR (NTT) DAN WILAYAH MALUKU & MALUKU UTARA

(MMU) UNTUK PENYUSUNAN STUDI PERENCANAAN

GEOSPASIAL KELISTRIKAN UNTUK PROYEK SMALL

HYDROPOWER PLANT IN INDONESIA

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

between

PT PLN (PERSERO)

and

GESTO – ENERGIA, S.A.

on

DATA PROVISION UNDER THE SCOPE OF SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING IN INDONESIA (ESMAP

PROJECT) GDGD HDH

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

This Memorandum of Understanding (hereafter referred to as “MoU”) is made on Wednesday, April 16th, 2014 by and between the following: 1. PT PLN (Persero), a limited liability company

incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Indonesia, registered address in Jalan

2-10

NOTA KESEPAHAMAN

Nota Kesepahaman ini (selanjutnya disebut “Nota Kesepahaman”) dibuat pada hari Senin, tanggal 28 Oktober 2013 antara: 1. PT PLN (Persero), sebuah perusahaan

terbatas yang dibentuk berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan Republik Indonesia dengan alamat terdaftar di Jalan Trunojoyo Blok MI/135 Kebayoran Baru Jakarta 12160, Indonesia, diwakili oleh Bapak I Made Ro Sakya, Kepala Divisi Perencanaan Sistim PT PLN (Persero) berdasarkan Keputusan Direksi PT PLN (Persero) No.0958.K/426/DIR/2013 tanggal 05 Juni 2013, bertindak secara sah untuk dan atas nama PT PLN (Persero), seterusnya disebut sebagai “Pihak Pertama”;

2. Gesto Energy Consulting, sebuah perusahaan konsultan yang dibentuk berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan New Zealand, dengan alamat terdaftar di Av. Caceres Monteiro, N0.10, 10, Sul 1495 – 192 Alges, Portugal, diwakili

oleh Bapak Jorge André selaku Direktur Gesto Energy Consulting berdasarkan akta pendirian perusahaan No. 1237692 tanggal 6 September 2002 bertindak secara sah untuk dan atas nama Castalia Strategic Advisor, seterusnya disebut sebagai “Pihak Kedua”;

Selanjutnya Pihak Pertama dan Pihak Kedua secara masing-masing disebut “Pihak” dan secara bersama-sama disebut “Para Pihak”. Terlebih dahulu menerangkan hal-hal sebagai berikut: 1. PT PLN (Persero) adalah sebuah Badan

Usaha Milik Negara, memiliki bisnis utama dalam penyediaan tenaga listrik untuk semua daerah di Indonesia.

2. Gesto Energy Consulting adalah sebuah

Trunojoyo Blok M I/135 Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta 12160, Indonesia, is represented by Mr. I Made Ro Sakya, Head of System Planning Division of PT PLN (Persero) based on Board of Director Decree of PT PLN (Persero) No. 0958.K/426/DIR/2013 dated June 05th, 2013 and therefore legitimate and authorized to act for and on behalf of the PT PLN (Persero), hereinafter referred as “First Party”;

2. Gesto – Energia, S.A., a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Portugal, r with head office in Zona Industrial de Oliveira de Frades, 3680-170 Oliveira de Frades, Viseu with office in Av. Caceres Monteiro, N0.10, 10, Sul 1495 – 192 Alges, Portugal is represented by its Directors Mr..

Miguel Barreto Caldeira Antunes,and Mr. Pedro Miguel Borges Fernandes, duly authorized for this purpose according to Permanent Certificate with online access code 6342-2714-0387 and therefore legitimate and authorized to act for and on behalf of the Gesto – Energia, S.A.(hereinafter referred to as “Second Party”).

Hereinafter referred to individually as “Party” and “collectively as “Parties”. WHEREAS: 1. PT PLN (Persero) is a State Owned Electricity

Company, having its core business in providing electrical power for all Regions in Indonesia.

2. Gesto – Energia, S.A. is a Private Company, having its core business in providing consulting services and having a separate agreement with the World Bank for preparation of Small Hydropower Mapping in Indonesia.

3. In order to carry out the assignment for

3-10

perusahaan swasta, yang memiliki bisnis utama menyediakan jasa konsultasi engineering dan telah terikat kontrak secara terpisah dengan Bank Dunia untuk membantu dalam penyusunan studi perencanaan geospasial terkait proyek Renewable Energy for Small Hydropower Plant in Indonesia.

3. Dalam rangka melaksanakan tugas penyusunan studi perencanaan geospasial kelistrikan untuk proyek REEP tersebut, Pihak Kedua membutuhkan peta digital yang dimiliki oleh Pihak Pertama.

4. Para Pihak bermaksud untuk mengadakan kesepahaman dalam rangka pelaksanaan dan penggunaan peta digital di wilayah Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) dan wilayah Maluku & Maluku Utara (MMU) untuk penyusunan studi perencanaan geospasial kelistrikan terkait dengan proyek REEP.

Berdasarkan hal-hal tersebut di atas, PARA PIHAK menyepakati sebagai berikut:

PASAL 1 Ruang Lingkup Nota Kesepahaman

Ruang lingkup pekerjaan dalam bantuan teknis (TA) ini terdiri dari tugas-tugas khusus yang akan dibahas dalam bagian ini. Secara geografis, tugas ini diharapkan dapat awalnya diujicobakan di dua provinsi di wilayah Indonesia Timur: (i) Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT), dilayani oleh Wilayah (cabang) kantor PLN yang berbasis di Kupang; dan (ii) provinsi Maluku dan Maluku Utara, dilayani oleh kantor Wilayah PLN di Ambon, Maluku. Adapun ruang lingkup pekerjaan tersebut meliputi: a. Tugas-1: Pengambilan data langsung

dilapangan, pengolahan data, persiapan dan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi geospasial untuk mendukung persiapan dan pelaksanaan dalam mendapatkan analisis referensi geospasial terhadap sistim jaringan isolated (MV / LV) dengan biaya termurah terkait dengan rencana

preparing the Small Hydropower Mapping, Second Party intends to use data and information owned or accessible by First

4. The Parties intend to establish an understanding within the framework of the implementation and utilization of the data provided by the First party to preparation ofthe Small Hydropower Mapping Project.

Now, therefore the Parties hereby agrees as follows:

ARTICLE 1 Scope of MoU

The scope of work under this Technical Assistance (TA) comprises of the specific tasks detailed in this section. Geographically, this assignment is expected to be initially national wide and o n a second stage piloted in three provinces in the Eastern Indonesia region: (i) province of Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT), served by the PLN Wilayah (branch) office based in Kupang; (ii) the provinces of Maluku and Maluku Utara, served by the PLN Wilayah office in Ambon, (iii) the province of Sulawesi, served by the PLN Wilayah office in Gorontalo(?). The scope of this MoU includes the tasks in Annex 1 – Terms of Reference.

ARTICLE 2 Implementation of MoU

1. First Party’s

1.1. Allowing the use of yard land owned by First Party (if available) or available work room in PLN Region (“First Party Unit”) in East Nusa Tenggara (NTT), Maluku & North Maluku (MMU) and Sulawesi for Small Hydropower Mapping implementation.

1.2. To assist Second Party to do coordinate

mapping and coordinate with all related parties, including local governments, related to the permits and licenses.

4-10

investasi (2013-2025), dan biaya pembangkit energi terbarukan yang efektif untuk perpindahan diesel dan perluasan pembangkit untuk setiap sistem jaringan diesel yang masih isolated. Pekerjaan ini dapat didefinisikan lagi menjadi:

i. Penyusunan sturktur database GIS –Layer

ii. Penyusunan rencana investasi sistim jaringan baru dengan biaya termurah

iii. Rencana perluasan pembangkit hibrida untuk pembangkit diesel dengan biaya termurah

b. Tugas-2: Merancang Sistim Komunal

i. Identifikasi geospasial dan Menentukan karakter beban berdasarkan populasi kluster sesuai dengan komposisi ukuran

ii. Standard pelayanan untuk desain hibrida pada sistem komunal

iii. Evaluasi sistem hibrida pada jaringan alternatif microgrid sesuai tugas yang telah diidentifikasi pada tugas-2: b.i

c. Tugas-3: Rencana Sektor pembiayaan dan

Analisis perhitungan selisih pembiayaan proyek (2013-2018)

d. Tugas-4: Peningkatan kemampuan sumber daya manusia dalam pemanfaatan teknologi informasi geospasial kepada Pihak Pertama.

PASAL 2 Pelaksanaan Nota Kesepahaman

1. Pihak Pertama

1.1. Memperbolehkan penggunaan lahan milik Pihak Pertama (apabila memungkinkan) di halaman kantor / ruangan kantor yang tersedia pada PLN Unit setempat (“Unit Pihak Pertama”) di Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Timur dan Wilayah Maluku dan Maluku Utara, untuk pelaksanaan studi perencanaan geospasial kelistrikan.

1.2. Mendampingi PIHAK KEDUA melakukan pemetaan koordinat dan

1.3. First Party has right to own and use the Small Hydropower Mapping done by Second Party.

1.4. To make available to the Second Party the necessary data and information in their possession considered relevant for the completion of the assignment.

2. Second Party’s

2.1. Prepare the details of the Small Hydropower Mapping in accordance with the planned schedule (Annex 1 – Terms of Reference).

2.2. To provide training for First Party’s regarding the operational and geospatial information to personnel due to enhance and improve First Party’s personnel capacity and knowledge.

2.3. In of the event, the result of Small Hydropower Mapping is not accordance to the agreed by the Parties and/or term of this MoU has expired, the Second Party shall submit all results of studies that have been made to the first party.

ARTICLE 3 Cost and Taxation

All costs (installation, operation and maintenance) including costs in obtaining all permits required and tax incurred due to the said Small Hydropower Mapping study will be covered and borne by Second Party.

ARTICLE 4

Correspondence and Communication

Any notice, request or communication under this MoU shall be in Indonesia and English language and given to address specified below. First Party: 1. I MADE RO SAKYA

Head of System Planning Division

5-10

koordinasi dengan sejumlah pihak terkait termasuk pemerintah daerah setempat berkaitan dengan izin-izin.

1.3. Pihak Pertama berhak untuk memiliki dan menggunakan hasil studi perencanaan geospasial kelistrikan yang dibuat oleh Pihak Kedua.

2. Pihak Kedua

2.1. Menyiapkan rincian program studi kelayakan sesuai dengan jadwal yang direncanakan.

2.2. Memberikan pelatihan terkait pelaksanaan dan informasi geospasial kepada pegawai Pihak Pertama untuk peningkatan kapasitas dan pengetahuan pegawai Pihak Pertama;

2.3. Dalam hal hasil Studi perencanaan geospasial kelistrikan tidak sesuai dengan yang telah disepakati oleh Para Pihak dan/atau pada saat kesepakatan ini berakhir, maka Pihak Kedua akan menyerahkan semua hasil studi yang telah dibuat kepada pihak pertama.

PASAL 3 Biaya dan Pajak

Semua biaya termasuk biaya yang diperlukan untuk mengurus ijin-ijin yang diperlukan, pajak-pajak yang timbul sehubungan dengan studi kelayaakan menjadi tanggung jawab Pihak Kedua.

PASAL 4 Surat Menyurat dan Komunikasi

Setiap laporan, permintaan atau komunikasi sehubungan dengan Nota Kesepahaman ini akan diajukan dalam Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris dan ditujukan pada alamat sebagai berikut:

2. SYOFVI F. ROEKMAN Head of Corporate Strategic Planning Division

3. MOCH. SOFYAN Head of New & Renewable Energy DIvision

Office Address:

PT PLN (Persero) Headquarter Jl. Trunojoyo, Blok M I/135 Jakarta 12160 Phone : (021) 725 1234 ext. 1155; ext. 1244 Fax : (021) 739 7359 Alamat Email : I Made Ro Sakya: [email protected] Syofvi F. Roekman: [email protected] Moch. Sofyan : [email protected] Second Party:

Jorge André Vice-President Gesto – Energia, S.A. Av. Caceres Monteiro, N0.10, 10, Sul 1495–192 Alges, Portugal Telp : +351 211 579 899 Faks : +351 211 540 900 Email Address: [email protected]

ARTICLE 5 Confidentiality

1. Each Party acknowledges that certain

information is classified confidential which is any information received from the disclosing party pertaining to the Disclosing Party or any Affiliate thereof, since the date the Parties execute this Agreement and with retroactive effect from _____April 15th 2014__., of whatsoever nature (including technical, financial, commercial, legal or intellectual property) and in whatsoever form (including oral, electronic or digitized) and howsoever stored (including in hard copy or electronically), which is disclosed in any form, including any documentation,

mailto:[email protected]



6-10

Pihak Pertama: 1. I MADE RO SAKYA Kepala Divisi Perencanaan Sistim

2. SYOFVI F. ROEKMAN

Kepala Divisi Perencanaan Strategis Korporat

3. Moch. Sofyan Kepala Divisi Energi Baru dan Terbarukan

Alamat Kawat Surat:

PT PLN (Persero) KANTOR PUSAT Jl. Trunojoyo, Blok M I/135 Jakarta 12160 Telp : (021) 725 1234 ext. 1155; ext. 1244 Faks : (021) 739 7359 Alamat Email : I Made Ro Sakya: [email protected] Syofvi F. Roekman: [email protected] Moch. Sofyan : [email protected] Pihak Kedua:

Jorge André Director Gesto Energy Consulting Av. Caceres Monteiro, N0.10, 10, Sul 1495–192 Alges, Portugal Telp : +351 211 579 899 Faks : +351 211 540 900 Alamat Email : (silahkan menulis email anda)

spreadsheets, correspondence, memoranda, notes, analyses or financial data (“Confidential Information”)

2. Each Party shall keep strict confidential and will not use for any other purpose than developing the Small Hydropower Mapping Study, or reveal to any other person, firm or other company any Confidential Information unless it obtains a prior written consent of the Party which had originally disclosed or contributed such information. The foregoing shall however not apply to: a. Disclose to such directors, officers or

employees of the Party who, for the purpose of this MoU, are directly involved with the assessment of the Confidential Information.

b. Information which shall come into public domain.

c. Information which is required or allowed to be disclosed under any law, government order, decree and regulation.

d. In relation of the implementation that second Party assisted by Subcontractors, the Second Party shall ensure that subcontractors do not provide data to other parties without the consent of the First Party in accordance with the content of the provisions in Article 5 in this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6 Amendment

This MoU may only be amended or modified in written, agreed and signed by the Parties.

ARTICLE 7 Term of MoU




7-10

PASAL 5 Kerahasiaan

1. Masing-masing Pihak sepakat bahwa

informasi tertentu diklasifikasikan sebagai rahasia, yaitu setiap informasi yang diterima dari pemberi informasi terkait pemberi informasi atau afiliasinya, sejak tanggal Nota Kesepahaman ini ditandatangani, apapun jenisnya (termasuk teknis, finansial, komersial, legal atau kekayaan intelektual) dan dalam bentuk apapun juga (termasuk lisan, elektronik atau digital) dan bagaimana pun cara penyimpanannya (termasuk dalam bentuk salinan dokumen atau dokumen elektronik), yang diungkapkan oleh pemberi informasi dalam bentuk apapun, termasuk dalam bentuk dokumentasi, spreadsheet, surat menyurat, memorandum, catatan, analisis atau data keuangan (“Informasi Rahasia”)

2. Masing-masing Pihak akan secara ketat menjaga kerahasiaan dan tidak akan digunakan untuk tujuan lain selain pelaksanaan Studi kelayakan, Pemetaan Geospasial, atau diberikan kepada pihak lain, lembaga atau perusahaan lain segala Informasi Rahasia kecuali dengan persetujuan tertulis dari pihak yang sebelumnya telah mengungkapkan atau memberikan informasi tersebut. Ketentuan ini tidak berlaku terhadap: a. Pemberitahuan kepada direktur,

petugas atau karyawan dari PIHAK yang secara langsung terlibat dengan Informasi Rahasia tersebut berdasarkan Nota Kesepahaman ini.

b. Informasi yang merupakan informasi publik.

c. Informasi yang tersedia pada PIHAK yang pada dasarnya dikategorikan non-rahasia sebelum Nota Kesepahaman ini berlaku.

d. Informasi yang diperbolehkan atau diizinkan untuk diungkapkan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan, Peraturan Pemerintah, Surat

1. The MoU will be valid up to two (2) years

commencing from the date of signing and will be automatically terminate, unless extended by written consent mutually agreed by the Parties.

2. In case of termination MoU, neither Party shall have any further duty/obligation to other Party other than pursuant to Article 5.

3. This MoU shall be considered as non-binding and non-exclusive agreement.

ARTICLE 8 Law, Disputes, Assignments

1. According to Article 1 of this MoU, if any

dispute or difference of any kind whatsoever shall be arise (“Dispute”) between the Parties in the connection with, or arising out of, this MOU hereof, the Parties shall attempt, for a period of thirty (30) days after the receipt by one Party of a notice from the other Party of the existence of the Dispute to settle such Dispute in the instance by mutual discussion between the Parties.

2. If the Dispute cannot be settled by mutual discussion within the 30 days period provided in paragraph 1 this article by the Parties, the Dispute will be finally settled by Indonesia National Board of Arbitration in Jakarta National.

3. The MoU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Indonesia.

4. Neither Party shall assign or transfer the benefits or obligations of this MoU to any third party or parties without the prior written consent of the other Party during the term of this MoU.

ARTICLE 9

8-10

Keputusan, Undang-Undang, atau peraturan yang berlaku.

e. Sehubungan dalam pelaksanaanya Pihak Kedua dibantu oleh Sub kontraktor, maka Pihak Kedua harus menjamin subkontraktor tersebut tidak memberikan data kepada pihak lain tanpa persetujuan Pihak Pertama sesuai dengan isi ketentuan dalam Pasal 5 Perjanjian ini.

PASAL 6

Amandemen

Nota Kesepahamanan ini hanya dapat diamandemen atau dirubah sepanjang disepakati dan ditandatangani oleh PARA PIHAK dalam bentuk tertulis.

PASAL 7 Jangka Waktu Nota Kesepahaman

1. Nota Kesepahaman ini berlaku untuk

jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun terhitung sejak ditandatangani dan akan berakhir secara otomatis, kecuali diperpanjang secara tertulis berdasarkan persetujuan PARA PIHAK.

2. Dalam hal berakhirnya Nota Kesepahamanan, tidak ada tugas/kewajiban/klaim lebih lanjut antara satu PIHAK dan PIHAK lainnya kecuali kewajiban sebagaimana ditentukan pada Pasal 5.

3. Nota Kesepahaman ini adalah tidak mengikat dan tidak bersifat eksklusif.

PASAL 8 Hukum, Perselisihan, Pengalihan

1. Mengacu pada ketentuan dalam Pasal 1

dari Nota Kesepahaman ini, jika ada sengketa atau perbedaan apapun yang terjadi antara Para Pihak atau timbul karena Nota Kesepahaman ini, Para Pihak

Miscellaneous

1. This MoU construes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject to matter. There are no warranties, term, conditions, undertakings or collateral agreements, expressed, implied or statutory, among the Parties other than those expressly set forth herein.

2. This MoU including all modifications and amendments to this MoU will be made within 2 (two) languages, Indonesian and English languages. In case there is any difference or discrepancy between the 2 (two) languages, the Indonesian version will be prevail and used as reference.

For and behalf of: First Party PT PLN (Persero) I MADE RO SAKYA HEAD OF SYSTEM PLANNING DIVISION Second Party GESTO – ENERGIA, S.A. MIGUEL BARRETO CEO PEDRO BORGES FERNANDES COO

9-10

wajib berusaha, dalam jangka waktu 30 (tiga puluh) hari setelah diterimanya pemberitahuan dari salah satu Pihak kepada Pihak lainnya untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut melalui suatu cara musyawarah dan mufakat antara Para Pihak.

2. Jika Perselisihan tidak dapat diselesaikan secara musyawarah dan mufakat dalam jangka waktu 30 (tiga puluh) hari sesuai ayat 1 Pasal ini, maka Perselisihan akan diselesaikan secara final melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI) di Jakarta.

3. Nota Kesepahaman ini akan diberlakukan dan ditafsirkan sesuai dengan hukum Republik Indonesia.

4. Tidak satupun Pihak dapat memberikan atau mengalihkan Nota Kesepahaman ini kepada pihak ketiga tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari Pihak lainnya.

PASAL 9 Lain-lain

1. Nota Kesepahaman ini merupakan seluruh

perjanjian antara PARA Pihak sehubungan dengan ruang lingkup Nota Kesepahaman ini. Tidak ada jaminan, syarat-syarat, kondisi, usaha atau perjanjian jaminan, pernyataan, secara eksplisit maupun implisit, diantara Para Pihak selain yang secara tegas tercantum dalam Nota Kesepahaman ini.

2. Nota Kesepahaman ini termasuk semua modifikasi dan perubahan akan dibuat dalam 2 (dua) bahasa, bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia. Dalam hal terdapat perbedaan persepsi atau pemahaman antara kedua bahasa, maka versi bahasa Indonesia yang akan berlaku dan digunakan sebagai acuan.

10-10

Untuk dan atas nama: Pihak Pertama PT PLN (Persero) I MADE RO SAKYA KEPALA DIVISI PERENCANAAN SISTIM Pihak Kedua GESTO ENERGY CONSULTING MIGUEL BARRETO CEO

GESTO ENERGIA S.A.



T. +351 211 579 899

F. +351 211 540 900

www.gestoenergy.com

World Bank Document...Training on Small Hydro GIS database and Small Hydro Potential Evaluation...

Documents

Transcript of World Bank Document...Training on Small Hydro GIS database and Small Hydro Potential Evaluation...