1. Onderzoek, onderwijs eninnovatie: de drie-eenheidvan het hoger onderwijs Dirk Van Damme Head of the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation - OECD

2. Vragen Welke rol speelt het HO inStimuleert het HO ook zijnde creatie van nieuwekennis?eigen innovatie?Onderzoek In welke mate ontwikkelt het HO de competentiesvoor employability, socialeIn welke mate draagt het participatie en innovatie? HO bij tot innovatie? Hogeronderwijs OnderwijsInnovatie 2 3. Basisstelling Het Nederlandse HO doet het quaonderzoek, innovatie en onderwijs vrijgoed, maar er is ruimte voorverbetering, ook gezien de groei in anderelanden, en sommige zaken dienen echtaangepakt om een duurzame kwaliteit tegaranderen in de toekomst. 3 4. 1.ONDERZOEK4 5. Researchers, per thousandemployment R&D Volumes in 2000 USD - constant BRIICS FIN16.0 prices and PPP North America1 Billion EU27 10 Billion14.0 ISL DNK12.0 100 Billion JPNNZLNOR USASWE10.0KORPRT FRACAN GBR AUS AUT 8.0 BELEST IRL DEUSVNESP LUX SVKRUS 6.0NLDCHECZE HUNGRC ITA 4.0 POL TUR 2.0ZAF CHN MEX CHL 0.0 0.0 0.51.01.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0Gross domestic expenditures on R&D as a percentage of GDP 5 6. Sweden (1999-2008)Switzerland DenmarkIcelandFinlandCanada AustriaIsraelSingapore Australia (1998-2006)NetherlandsNorway (1999-2008) PortugalUnited Kingdom Japan (1998-2007) GermanyEU27Belgium France OECD Ireland2008ItalyKoreaNew Zealand (1999-Spain1998United States TurkeyGreece (1999-2007)Czech Republic Hungary Slovenia PolandSouth Africa (2001-07) RomaniaArgentina (1998-2007) China (1998-2007)Slovak RepublicMexico (1998-2007) Russian FederationLuxembourg (2001-08)6 Higher education expenditure on R&D as % of GDP0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0% 7. Regionale kennisclustersShare of region incountrysbiotechnology patents100(log scale) % Hovedstaden (DK)Capital Region (KR) Ontario (CA)West-Nederland (NL)Ile de France (FR)Southern-Kanto (JP)Zuid-Nederland (NL)Bayern (DE)California (US)Chungcheong Region10 Tokai (JP) (KR)Baden-Wuerttemberg Rhne-Alpes (FR)Nordrhein-Westfalen (DE) (DE)Massachusetts (US) Hessen (DE) Maryland (US)Pennsylvania (US)New York (US) New Jersey (US) North Carolina (US) Texas (US)Washington (US)Illinois (US) 1Minnesota (US)Michigan (US) 0 0110 100Share of region in countrys nanotechnology patents (log scale) %7 8. Wetenschappelijke publicaties en co-authoring 1998-2008 1998 2008SwedenSweden Poland Belgium France PolandBelgium FranceRussian Federation Russian ItalyFederation. Italy Netherlands NetherlandsSwitzerlandSwitzerland Germany Spain GermanySpain Japan JapanKoreaKorea United Kingdom United Kingdom United States United States ChinaCanadaCanada China AustraliaAustraliaBrazil BrazilIndia India8 9. % 0.002.00 4.006.00 8.0010.0012.0014.0016.0020.0018.0048.8United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyFrance Canada China Italy Netherlands Japan Single authorAustraliaSwitzerland Spain Sweden BelgiumDenmark KoreaAustriaIndia International co-authorshipFinland Brazil NorwayRussian FederationPolandTurkeyIrelandGreece Domestic co-authorshipNew Zealand PortugalCzech Republic HungaryMexicoIceland Highly cited (top 1%) scientific articles by type of collaboration, 2006-08Slovak Republic9 Luxembourg Internationale onderzoekssamenwerking 10. 10 11. Internationale co-authoring toppublicatiesCountry 1-10 Index Country 11-20IndexBelgium3.48Canada 2.05Sweden 3.41Spain2.01Austria3.39Australia2.00Switzerland3.24Germany1.95Denmark3.10United Kingdom 1.80Finland3.02Korea1.19France 2.67Japan1.10Italy2.66China0.82Brazil 2.46India0.64Netherlands2.15United States0.5811 12. Science & Engineering doctorates As percentage of all doctorate degrees%70 36 37 34 38 33 38 38 33 45 35 35 45 34 32 30 31 46 37 37 34 15 33 39 36 34 64 29 19 41 41 38 49 38 3360Percentage of S&E50403020100 12 13. 2.INNOVATIE13 14. European Innovation Scoreboard 14 15. European Innovation Scoreboard 15 16. European Innovation Scoreboard 16 17. 3.ONDERWIJS17 18. 1015 2025 3035 4045 50 0 5 Canada% United States New Zealand Estonia Finland Australia NorwaySwedenNetherlandsSwitzerland2000sUnited Kingdom Denmark Japan Germany Iceland1990sBelgium OECD average LuxembourgEU19 averageIreland1980sFranceSpainHungarySlovenia Greece1970s years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years and 55-64 years Austria Poland KoreaSlovak RepublicCzech Republic ItalyGrowth in university-level qualifications MexicoChile Percentage of the population that has attained tertiary-type A education in the age groups 25-34BrazilTurkeyPortugal 19. % 1020 3040 5060 70 0Korea CanadaJapan Russian Federation1 Ireland NorwayNew ZealandLuxembourg United KingdomAustraliaDenmarkFrance Israel Belgium Sweden United States Netherlands SwitzerlandFinland Spain 55-64 year-oldsOECD average EstoniaG20 averageIcelandPolandChileSlovenia Greece 25-34 year-olds GermanyHungaryPortugal Educational attainmentAustria Slovak Republic Czech RepublicMexico Italy TurkeyPercentage of population that has attained tertiary education, by age group (2009) Brazil19 20. Proportion of population with tertiary education and potential growth (2009) 20 21. Percentage of 25-64 year-olds in employment, by level of education (2009)Tertiary education100Upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary90% 80706050403020TurkeyItalyNetherlands GermanyBelgiumFrancePortugal GreeceAustriaHungary Iceland EstoniaIsrael Japan NorwaySweden FinlandIrelandSpain DenmarkBrazilAustralia Chile Canada Korea United StatesPolandUnited Kingdom SwitzerlandSloveniaLuxembourg OECD average New ZealandSlovak RepublicCzech Republic Mexico Countries are ranked in descending order of the employment rate for individuals with tertiary education. Source: OECD. Table A7.3a. See Annex 3 for notes (www.oecd.org/edu/eag2011). 21 22. Tertiary graduates in science-related fields among 25-34 year-olds in employment, by gender (2009) Number of graduates per 100.000 employed 5,000 TotalMen Women 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Note: Science-related fields include life sciences; physical sciences, mathematics and statistics, computing; engineering and engineering trades, manufacturing and processing, architecture and building. 1. Year of reference 2008 for the number of graduates. Countries are ranked in descending order of the percentage of tertiary science-related graduates in tertiary-type A22 23. Shanghai-ChinaKoreaFinlandHong Kong-China CanadaSingaporeEstoniaJapanAustraliaNetherlands New Zealand Macao-ChinaNorway PolandDenmark Chinese Taipei Liechtenstein SwitzerlandIceland Ireland SwedenHungaryLatvia United States Portugal BelgiumUnited KingdomGermany Spain France ItalySloveniaGreeceSlovak RepublicCroatia Czech RepublicLithuania TurkeyLuxembourg IsraelRussian Federation AustriaChileDubai (UAE)SerbiaMexicoRomania BulgariaUruguayThailand Trinidad and Tobago Colombia JordanMontenegro BrazilTunisia Argentina IndonesiaAlbaniaPISA Reading score 2009 Kazakhstan QatarPeru PanamaAzerbaijan Kyrgyzstan020 40 8060-60-40-20-80100 -10023 24. PISA science score and research intensity24 25. Trends in PISANumber of yearsMean score infor which PISAReading Mathematics Sciencereading 2009 results areavailableKorea 539 9 1.6 0.7 5.3Finland 536 9-1.2-0.6-3.1Hong Kong-China 533 8 1.0 0.7 2.3Canada524 9-1.1-0.9-1.9New Zealand 521 9-0.9-0.7 0.5Japan 520 9-0.3-0.9 2.7Australia 515 9-1.5-1.7 0.1Netherlands 508 6-0.8-2.0-0.9Belgium 506 9-0.1-2.3-1.3Norway503 9-0.2 0.5 4.4Estonia 501 3 0.1-0.8-1.2Switzerland 501 9 0.7 1.2 1.7Poland500 9 2.4 0.8 3.4Iceland 500 9-0.7-1.4 1.6United States 500 9-0.5 0.8 4.425 26. Science score and interest in science in PISA 640 LOW SCORE HIGH SCOREInterest in Science Topics HIGH INTEREST HIGH INTEREST 620IDNMEX 600 BRACHL 580PRT 560GRC 540TUR RUS ESP HKGITAFRA MAC 520SVK DEU HUNISRLUX AUT SVN JPN 500POL BEL CHEEST CZE KOR 480 USAIRLNORCANISLGBR AUS 460 DNKNZL LOW SCOREFINHIGH SCORE SWE LOW INTEREST NLDLOW INTEREST 440 380400 420 440 460 480 500520540 560 580 600620PISA 2006 Science Score26 27. 4.TOTAALBEELD27 28. NL universiteiten in THEWUR rankingEurope total score 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30Erasmus University Rotterdam University of TwenteWageningen University28 29. 5.EN INNOVATIE IN HET HOZELF? 29 30. Indicators of Innovation in education Proportion of professionals in the education sectorworking in a very highly or highly innovative organisation80 Knowledge or method71 7270 66 67 6863 64 64 61 61 62 59 606055 53 50 51 50504340 363020100Source: OECD, based on REFLEX (2005) and HEGESCO (2008) 31. Innovation in Education is Mainly about Knowledge and Methods Percentage of graduates working in the education sector perceiving innovation intensity in their organisation as very high or high in 200580%70%59%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%Knowledge or method innovationProduct or service innovation Technology, tools or instruments innovation Source: REFLEX (2005) and HEGESCO (2008) Year 2008 instead of 2005 for Slovenia, Turkey, Lithuania, Poland and Hungary31 32. Educational Research and Development Science-driven innovation in education40Public budget for education research per student (2008) 35.0(2000 Dollars - Constant Prices and PPPs)353027.025 23.72017.815 13.010.7 10.4108.5 7.87.1 6.66.25.1 53.4 3.3 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.72.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.10.4 0 33. Dank voor uwaandacht !dirk.vandamme@oecd.org www.oecd.org/edu/ceri 33