MOF seminar

download MOF seminar

of 32

Transcript of MOF seminar

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    1/32

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    2/32

    1. Introduction

    2. Literature Review

    3. Objectives

    4. Experimental

    Synthesis of MOF catalysts

    Thermal degradation of polystyrene

    Decarboxylation of vegetable oils

    Theoretical prediction of catalytic activity of MOFs with substrates

    5. Results and discussion

    Characterization of MOF catalysts

    Thermal degradation of polystyrene using MOFs Decarboxylation of vegetable oils using MOFs

    6. Conclusions

    7. Road Map

    8. Future Work

    9. References

    CONTENTS

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    3/32

    MOF= Metal Organic Frameworks; Organic-Inorganichybrid materials

    Metal centre or

    cluster(inorganic part)

    Linker

    (organic part)

    Metal Organic

    Framework

    (coordination polymer)

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    4/32

    Advantages of MOFsas CATALYSTS Highly crystalline

    Highly Porous

    A MOF material has the world record in powder specific surface

    area: > 6000 m2/g

    Highly taliorable with large range in pore sizes and specific

    adsorption properties.

    Since highly taliorable certain functional groups can be added

    thereby increasing the specificity of certain reactions

    Disadvantages of MOFsas CATALYSTS

    Intolerance to high temperature.

    Sensitive to moisture and few environmental conditions

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    5/32

    Background/Motivation

    Polystyrene is a petroleum-based plastic made from the styrene monomer. Most people

    know it under the name Styrofoam.

    The biggest environmental health concern associated with polystyrene is the danger

    associated with Styrene.

    Polystyrene recycling is not "closed loop". This means that more resources will have

    to be used, and more pollution created, to produce more polystyrene cups.

    Catalytic degradation of polymeric materials especially

    on MOFs has not been yet studied extensively.

    In our present area of research we have chosen very

    important polymeric material viz. polystyrene for

    study.

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    6/32

    Hydrocarbon fuels has always active area of research. The present day technologies

    focuses on biotransformation of vegetable oils followed by esterification using

    methanol to obtain bio diesel.

    Background/Motivation

    In our present area of research we have chosen MOFs to catalyse reaction leading

    to direct decarboxylation of fatty acids in bio transformed oils and vegetable oils

    to hydrocarbons that fall more or less in the diesel series.

    The preliminary planned study is to be conducted on

    coconut oil and various MOFs.

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    7/32

    Catalyst used Temperature Products Researchers Reference

    4,4'-

    isopropylidenc

    bis(2,6-dibromophenol

    250-370C styrene, carbon dioxide,

    water, benzaldehyde,

    alpha-methylstyrene,phenol, phenylacetaldehyde

    and acetophenone

    MacNeilland et al. [1]

    p-tolune

    sulfonic acid

    150-170C Vishal Karmore and

    Giridhir Madras

    [2]

    zeolites and

    silica

    300C and

    400C

    C6C24series hydrocarbons Carnitiand et al. [3]

    ZSM-11 400-500C styrene and 1, 5 hexadiene Lilina et al. [4]

    Natural

    clinoptilolite

    zeolite HNZ

    400C styrene and liquid oils in

    range of C6C12

    Lee et al. [5]

    LITERATURE REVIEW - i

    Degradation of polystyrene

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    8/32

    Reaction type Catalyst used Temperature Products Researchers Reference

    Deoxygenation of

    glycerol

    alumina 450C monoalkanes Vonghia et al. [6]

    Deoxygenated of

    canola oil

    MoxNyand V

    over supported

    alumina

    380-410C medium level

    diesel oil

    Monnier et al. [7]

    Decarboxylation

    of oleic acid

    MgO 350C C10C16series

    hydrocarbons

    Jeong-Geol Na

    et al.

    [8]

    Decarboxylation

    of oleic acid,

    palmitic acid

    activated carbons

    impregnated with

    Pd and

    supercritical

    water

    370C C11C16series

    hydrocarbons

    Fuand et al. [9]

    LITERATURE REVIEW - ii

    Decarboxylation of vegetable oils

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    9/32

    To synthesise and characterize different metal organicframeworks suitable for catalysis.

    To study catalytic activities of different metal organicframeworks on various substrates.

    To theoretically predict catalytic activity of studied metalorganic framework.

    To determine the reaction kinetics for various substratesduring catalysis.

    RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    10/32

    EXPERIMENTAL

    SYNTHESIS OF MOF CATALYSTS -I

    Cu-BTC (HKUST-1)

    Cu(NO3)2 +

    Zn-BDC (MOF-5)

    Zn(NO3)2 +

    Fe-BDC (MIL-53 Fe)

    FeCl3 +

    Pb-BTC

    Pb(NO3)2 +

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    11/32

    EXPERIMENTAL

    SYNTHESIS OF MOF CATALYSTS -II

    Cu- BTC

    Temp=1000

    C Time =10hrs

    Washing

    Solvent

    With Normal

    Methanol

    Zn-BDC

    Temp=1000

    C Time =24hrs

    Washing

    Solvent

    DMF

    Fe-BDC

    Temp=1000

    C Time =10hrs

    Washing

    Solvent

    DMF

    Pb- BTC

    Temp=100

    0

    C Time =10hrs

    Washing

    Solvent

    With DMF,

    Water

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    12/32

    EXPERIMENTAL

    THERMAL DEGRADATION OF POLYSTYRENE

    Polystyrene (Case reference)

    Temp=30 -700 0C

    Catalyst: NIL

    In presence of Air

    Catalysts

    Cu-BTC

    Zn-BDC

    Fe-BDC

    Pb-BTC

    MOFs AS CATALYSTS Cu-BTC Zn-BDC Fe-BDC Pb-BTC

    Breakdown temperature (oC) 275 400 380 400

    Experimental Temperature (oC) 250 350 300 350

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    13/32

    EXPERIMENTAL

    DECARBOXYLATION OF VEGETABLE OILS

    Coconut oil (Case reference)

    Temp: 30 -150 0C

    Catalyst: NIL

    Inert environment

    Reaction time: 1 - 2 hrs.

    Product separation : Solvent (Hexane)

    Catalysts

    Cu-BTC Zn-BDC

    Fe-BDC

    Pb-BTC

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    14/32

    THEORETICAL PREDICTION OF CATALYTIC ACTIVITY-I

    The basic structure of catalyst taken was the secondary building

    unit(SBU) on the assumption that the former is the catalytic active site.

    The structure of the SBU was obtained from the literature after

    comparing PXRD data of synthesized MOF with the PXRD datafound in the literature.

    The substrate for the reaction was drawn using the software

    Chemsketch.

    The drawn structure of the substrate was the geometricallyoptimized.

    The resultant end products structures were also drawn and

    geometrically optimized.

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    15/32

    THEORETICAL PREDICTION OF CATALYTIC ACTIVITY-II

    The optimized structure (i.e. substrate )along with the SBU was

    loaded to the software FIREFLY that determines the saddle point

    energy by choosing the appropriate chemical model using Densityfunctional theory (DFT).

    The difference Energy (saddle point) - (Energy(initial

    substrate)+Energy(Catalyst)) is the activation energy holds true only ifthe difference is positive.

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    16/32

    Results and discussion

    Characterization of MOF catalysts

    10 20 30 40 50

    Intensity

    Two Theta Angle

    Cu -Pure methanol

    Cu-BTC

    Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Imaging X-Ray diffraction Pattern

    BET Surface area : 785.68 m2/g

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    17/32

    Results and discussion

    Characterization of MOF catalysts Zn-BDC

    Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) ImagingX-Ray diffraction Pattern

    BET Surface area : ------ m2/g

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    18/32

    Results and discussion

    Characterization of MOF catalysts Fe-BDC

    Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Imaging X-Ray diffraction Pattern

    BET Surface area : 121.36 m2/g

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    5 15 25 35 45

    Intensity

    Two Theta Angle

    Fe

    Fe Fe

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    19/32

    Results and discussion

    Characterization of MOF catalysts Pb-BTC

    Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) ImagingX-Ray diffraction Pattern

    BET Surface area : 11.28 m2/g

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    5 15 25 35 45 55

    Intensity

    Two Theta Angle

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    20/32

    Results and discussion

    Characterization of MOF catalysts

    Thermo gravimetric Analysis

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    21/32

    Results and discussion

    Characterization of MOF catalysts -Explained

    From the PXRD data

    The materials synthesized are found to be crystalline.

    On indexing the PXRD data ,the synthesized MOFs data pattern

    matches exactly with those in the literature.

    From BET data the materials synthesized are found to have high

    surface area .

    From TGA data the degradation profile of MOFs can be understood,the final end product of TGA was determined to be corresponding

    metal oxides.

    MOFs AS CATALYSTS Cu-BTC Zn-BDC Fe-BDC Pb-BTC

    Breakdown temperature (o

    C) 275 400 380 400

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    22/32

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    75 125 175 225 275 325 375 425 475 525

    F

    ractionalConversion(X)

    Temperature C

    ps

    cubtc-ps

    pbbtc-ps

    febdc-ps

    znbdc-ps

    THERMAL DEGRADATION OF POLYSTYRENE

    Results and discussion

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    23/32

    THERMAL DEGRADATION OF POLYSTYRENE -Explained

    Results and discussion

    From the TGA profile for polystyrene it can be seen that virgin

    polystyrene starts its thermal degradation at around 380 C.

    On addition of MOFs as catalyst the main point to be noted is that the

    degradation of MOFs should be minimal to negligible.

    It can be clearly seen that Cu-BTC shows highly promising resultsfollowed by Pb-BTC and more or less same result by Fe-BDC and

    Zn-BDC.

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    24/32

    Decarboxylation of vegetable oils using MOFs

    Results and discussion

    Coconut oil ( reference)

    Temp: 110 0C

    Catalyst: Fe-BDC

    Inert environment

    Reaction time: 2 hrs.

    Product separation : Solvent

    (Hexane)

    Observations

    Color of Oil: changed from

    colorless to dark brown. Product separation : Solvent

    (Hexane)

    Three phase mixture was obtained

    that is to be analyzed.

    Inference: Breaking down oil to smaller compounds and carbon soot

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    25/32

    Road MapActivity Time period

    January,2011

    TO

    June,

    2011

    July,2011

    TO

    December,

    2011

    January,

    2012

    TO

    March,

    2012

    April, 2012

    TO

    June,

    2012

    July,2012

    TO

    August,

    2012

    September,2012

    TO

    October,

    2012

    November,

    2012

    TO

    December

    2012

    Literature survey and

    Research theme

    selection with

    Preliminary

    Experimental Runs

    Course work

    Synthesis and

    Characterization of

    MOFs and Substrates

    Running reactionkinetics and

    standardization

    Integrating catalysts

    on inert support

    Running kinetics in

    pilot scale reactor

    Thesis writing

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    26/32

    Synthesis and Characterization of Copper, Lead and Zincbased MOFs are carried out successfully.

    Thermal degradation analysis of polystyrene with all thementioned MOFs is completed.

    Cu-BTC and Pb-BTC show promise in degradation ofpolystyrene.

    Decarboxylation of vegetable oil (coconut oil) was carriedout. The process parameters for the above reaction have to befine-tuned for optimum conversion.

    Conclusions

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    27/32

    Determination of suitable and optimum catalyst quantity for

    thermal degradation of polystyrene and/or decarboxylation ofvegetable oil.

    Reusability of the catalyst used for particular reactions.

    Predicting the reaction kinetics for the catalytic reaction

    under study using FIREFLY software.

    FUTURE WORK

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    28/32

    I.C. McNeiil,L. P. Razumovskii, V. M. Goldberg, G. E. Zaikov,The thermo-oxidative degradation ofpolystyrene,Polymer Degradation and Stability 45 47-55,(1994)

    Giridhar Madras, J. M. Smith & Benjamin J. McCoy,Thermal degradationkinetics of polystyrene in solution,Polymer Degradation and Stability, 58, 131-138,(1997)

    P. Carniti, A. Gervasini, P.L. Beltrame,G. Audisio, F. Bertini,Polystyrene thermo-degradation. III. Effect of acidic catalysts on radical formation and volatileproduct distribution,AppliedCatalysis A: General 127 , 139-155,(1995)

    Liliana B. Pierella1, Soledad Renzini, Daniel Cayuela, Oscar A.Anunziata,Catalytic degradation of polystyrene over ZSM-11 modifiedmaterials2ndMercosur Congress on Chemical Engineering and 4th MercosurCongress on Process Systems Engineering.

    REFERENCES

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    29/32

    S.Y. Lee, J.H. Yoon, J.R. Kim, D.W. Park,Catalyticdegradation of polystyrene overnaturalclinoptilolite zeolite,PolymerDegradation and Stability 74 ,297305,(2001)

    EnricoVonghia, David G. B. Boocock, Samir K. Konar, and AnnaLeung,Pathwaysfor the Deoxygenation of Triglycerides toAliphatic Hydrocarbons over Activated

    Alumina,Energy& Fuels ,9, 1090-1096,(1995)

    Jacques Monniera, HardiSulimmab, Ajay Dalaib, GianniCaravaggio,Hydrodeoxygenation of oleic acid and canola oil over alumina-supportedmetal nitrides,AppliedCatalysis A: General 382 ,176180,(2010)

    Jeong-Geol Na, Bo Eun Yi, Ju Nam Kim, Kwang Bok Yi, Sung-Youl Park, Jong-

    HoPark,Jong-Nam Kim, Chang Hyun Ko ,Hydrocarbon production fromdecarboxylation of fatty acid without hydrogen,CatalysisToday 156 ,4448(2010).

    JieFu,FanShi,L. T. Thompson, Jr.,XiuyangLu,and Phillip E.Savage,ActivatedCarbons for Hydrothermal Decarboxylation of FattyAcids,ACSCatal., 1, 227231,(2011).

    REFERENCES

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    30/32

    Chui,S.S.-Y., Lo,S.M.-F., Charmant,J.P.H., Orpen,A.G., and Williams,I.D.,AChemically Functionalizable Nanoporous material [Cu3(TMA)2(H2O)3]n, Science,283, 1148-1150 (1999).

    HenrikFan Clausen, RasmusDamgaardPoulsen, Andrew D. Bond, Marie-Agnes

    S.Chevallier, Bo BrummerstedtIversen, Solvothermal synthesis of new metalorganic framework structures in the zincterephthalic aciddimethyl formamidesystem Solid State Chemistry 178, 33423351(2005).

    G. Frey, F. Millange, M. Morcrette, C. Serre, M.-L. Doublet, J.-M. Grenche,Synthesis of metalorganic framework MIL-53 (Fe),Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46,3259, 2007.

    David Farrusseng, Sonia Aguado, and Catherine Pinel,MetalOrganic Frameworks:Opportunities for Catalysis,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48, 75027513,(2009)

    Jinping Li, Shaojuan Cheng, Qiang Zhao, Peipei Long, JinxiangDong, Synthesisand hydrogen-storage behavior of metalorganic framework MOF-5 hydrogenenergy 34, 1377-1382 (2009).

    REFERENCES

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    31/32

    THANK YOU.

  • 8/12/2019 MOF seminar

    32/32

    MOFs AS CATALYSTS Cu-BTC Zn-BDC Fe-BDC Pb-BTC

    Breakdown temperature (oC) 275 400 380 400

    Experimental Temperature (oC) 250 350 300 350

    MOFs AS CATALYSTS Cu-BTC Zn-BDC Fe-BDC Pb-BTC

    Lower temperature Limit (oC) 150 125 75 50

    Upper Temperature Limit (oC) 275 400 380 400

    Temperature range under analysis (oC)150-250 125-350 75-300 50-350