LED VERLICHTING“BEZINT EER GE BEGINT”

VerlichtingseisenParkeergarages

• NEN-EN 12464-1

• NEN-EN 2443 en voor de noodverlichting

• NEN-EN 1838

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

NEN12464-1 NEN2443

Parkeerplaats 75 40

Rijstroken 75 40

In- en uitritten (dag) 300 200*

In- en uitritten (nacht) 75 100*

Lift en trappenhuizen 100 100

Kassa's, balies, betaalautomaten 300 200

* op 1 m hoogte

De verlichtingseisen ten aanzien van lichtsterkte zijn:

De weergegeven waarden zijn in lux (Em) op de vloer tenzij anders aangegeven.

Energiebesparing

Specificatie TL versus LED:

• TL: T8 - 1x58W/14W;

• TL: T5 – 49W/6W;

• LED: ± 30W;

Operationele kosten

Besparing op:

• Energiekosten;

• Onderhoudskosten;

• Levensduur garantie;

End-of-life

Bijvoorbeeld:

• Installatie wordt afgekeurd o.b.v. NEN 3140 keuring;

• Frequentie van storingen neemt toe;

Upgrade naar norm

Bijvoorbeeld:

• Licht kwaliteit voldoet niet aan de norm(en);

• Onderscheidend in licht beleving met lichtniveaus boven de norm;

• Optimaal lichtontwerp

CO2 besparing & subsidie

Bijvoorbeeld:

• 0,054 kg/kWh CO2 reductie;

• Subsidie bij > 100 lumen/watt;

Enkele redenen voor ombouw van fluoriscentie naar LED

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

LED-oplossingenLED-armatuur versus LED-buis

• TL-buis is een rondstraler en optiek brengtjuiste lichtspreiding;

• LED-buis heeft een beperkte stralingshoeken bestaand optiek levert zeer beperktebijdrage aan lichtspreiding;

• LED-armatuur heeft een optimaal optiekvoor lichtspreiding toegesneden op detoepassing zoals bijv. asymmetrisch, widebeam, etc.

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

LED-armatuur

LED-buis

KEUZE LED -ARMATUUROPTISCHE VERSCHILLEN VOOR JUISTE SPREIDING VAN HET LICHT EN HET BEREIKEN VAN EEN GOED VERLICHTINGSNIVEAU EN GELIJKMATIGHEID CONFORM EISEN EN RICHTLIJNEN VRAAGT OM TOEPASSING VAN HET JUISTE ARMATUUR OP DE JUISTE POSITIE

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

Asymmetrical Beam Wide Beam

Wide BeamNarrow Beam

Voorbeeld (huidigesituatie)

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

Gemiddelde verlichtingswaarde: 71,36 luxGelijkmatigheid (Emin / Egem): 0,21

76

74

74

7272

77

74

75

72

73

6000 mm

8000 mm

16800 mm

10

00

mm

10

30

mm

157 20

167 23

159 18

145 10

17 106 151

24 75 160

27 72 143

27 68 133

18

19

18

15

Montage hoogte: 2430 mmHoogte plafond: 3050 mm

70

00

mm

65

61

46

54

Ombouw naar LED verlichting

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

Huidige situatie versus nieuwe situatie

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

Huidige situatie

Gemiddelde verlichtingswaarde: 71,3 luxGelijkmatigheid: 0,21

Nieuwe situatie• Aantal armaturen: 150• Type armatuur: AMP L4000-840 PC AB – 30W• Aantal branduren/jaar: 12 uur op 100%

12 uur op 15%door middel van Master/Slavemet ingebouwde bewegingssensor

• Aantal armaturen: 103• Type armatuur: 1x58W-T8 (72W) TL• Aantal branduren/jaar: 8.760 uur

Gemiddelde verlichtingswaarde: 97 luxGelijkmatigheid: 0,535

Standaard nog 20% dimming ter beschikking (norm 75 lux)

Huidige situatie versus nieuwe situatie–Energieverbruik & - kosten

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

Huidige situatie

• Aantal armaturen: 103• Type armatuur: 1x58W-T8 fluoriscentie• Aantal branduren/jaar: 8.760 uur

• Verbruik/jaar:103 x 72W x 8.760 uur = 64.964 kWh

• Energiekosten/jaar:64.964 kWh x € 0,14 = € 9.095

Nieuwe situatie

• Aantal armaturen: 150• Type armatuur: AMP L4000-840 PC AB – 30W• Aantal branduren/jaar: 12 uur op 100%

12 uur op 15%door middel van Master/Slavemet ingebouwde bewegingssensor

• Verbruik/jaar:150 x 30W x 8.760 = 39.420 kWh

• Besparing o.b.v. Master/Slave:(12 uur op 15%) = 16.750 kWh

• Energiekosten/jaar:22.670 kWh x € 0,14 = € 3.174

20% extra dimming economischbuiten beschouwing gehouden

Fin

anci

als

Bus

ines

s C

ase

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

Facility Name ExampleBusiness Case Length

(Years)10

Facility Number NLIndexed Electricity Cost

(p/kWh)€0,1400

Country NLControlled Luminaire

Quantity150,0 (100%)

Emergency Luminaire

Quantity,0 (0%)

Energy Savings €37.740

Maintenance Savings €9.481Average Operating

Hours/Day24,00

Performance Savings €23.667Average Operating

Days/Year365

Total Savings €70.888Average Operating

Hours/Year8.760

10 Years Total Fittings Consumption [kW] Consumption [kWh] Maintenance1 Performance2 Total3

Existing 103 74 649.642 €9.481 - €106.822

New 150 45 397.770 - (€23.667) €35.934

Delta/Saving 47 29 251.872 €9.481 €23.667 €70.888

Delta/Saving (%) 46% 39% 39% 100% - 66%

Inflation Excess 4 0 0 0 €1.399 €1.663 €3.062

² Performance savings are calculated by a reduction to kWh using an hourly reduction of 50,0% for the operating hours of the contro lled luminaires. This, in turn, results in a reduction to Energy and Green Tax costs, shown as a negative cost to new payments.

3 Inflation Excess figure is applicable to both existing and new costs over the business case length, a combination of both are used in calculating the savings figures.

€97.341

€59.601

€37.740

39%

-

1 The new maintenance cost accounts for additional expenditure during the business case term to maintain the new lighting system, based on the stated M ean Time Between Failures Rates and Average Component Costs from the manufacturer.

Energy

Business Case Overview

Project Details Key Metrics

Unlocked Savings Over 10 Years

Operating HoursEnergy

Energy

Energy

Maintenance

Maintenance

€108.221

€34.271

€73.950

Existing New Savings

Costs & Savings Over 10 Years

Facility Name ExampleBusiness Case Length

(Years)10

Facility Number NLIndexed Electricity Cost

(p/kWh)€0,1400

Country NLControlled Luminaire

Quantity150,0 (100%)

Emergency Luminaire

Quantity,0 (0%)

Energy Savings €37.740

Maintenance Savings €9.481Average Operating

Hours/Day24,00

Performance Savings €23.667Average Operating

Days/Year365

Total Savings €70.888Average Operating

Hours/Year8.760

10 Years Total Fittings Consumption [kW] Consumption [kWh] Maintenance1 Performance2 Total3

Existing 103 74 649.642 €9.481 - €106.822

New 150 45 397.770 - (€23.667) €35.934

Delta/Saving 47 29 251.872 €9.481 €23.667 €70.888

Delta/Saving (%) 46% 39% 39% 100% - 66%

Inflation Excess 4 0 0 0 €1.399 €1.663 €3.062

² Performance savings are calculated by a reduction to kWh using an hourly reduction of 50,0% for the operating hours of the contro lled luminaires. This, in turn, results in a reduction to Energy and Green Tax costs, shown as a negative cost to new payments.

3 Inflation Excess figure is applicable to both existing and new costs over the business case length, a combination of both are used in calculating the savings figures.

€97.341

€59.601

€37.740

39%

-

1 The new maintenance cost accounts for additional expenditure during the business case term to maintain the new lighting system, based on the stated M ean Time Between Failures Rates and Average Component Costs from the manufacturer.

Energy

Business Case Overview

Project Details Key Metrics

Unlocked Savings Over 10 Years

Operating HoursEnergy

Energy

Energy

Maintenance

Maintenance

€108.221

€34.271

€73.950

Existing New Savings

Costs & Savings Over 10 Years

Fin

anci

als

Cos

t & S

avin

gs

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

Years Total

x 10 Years €73.950Indexed Electricity Cost

(p/kWh)€0,1400

Upfront (€46.463)Parts & Labour

Warranty (Years)10 & 10

x 10 Years €27.487

DescriptionWithout

Failures

With

Failures

Average Payback3

(Years)6,28 6,28

Existing Maintenance /

Luminaire / Annum€9,20

IRR

(10 Years)11,74% 11,74%

Existing Energy Cost

(Year 1)€9.095

ROI

(10 Years)159,16% 159,16%

New Energy Cost

(Year 1)€5.569

Savings Pot

(Energy, Maintenance & Performance)100%

Total Project Cost 63%

Net Savings 37%

Project Costs & Savings

Net SavingsCore Assumptions

Savings / Costs Savings Pot Split

² There are no contro ls specified for this pro ject and so therefore no performance savings are generated for the client.3 Inflation Excess figure is applicable to both existing and new costs over the business case length, a combination of both are used in calculating the savings figures.

“ This Business Case is provided to Customer (“ Customer” ) by FES Lighting Europe No 1 Limited (“ Supplier” ) pursuant to the arrangements between the parties set out in the M aster Services Agreement dated 17th M ay 2018 (“ M SA” ). The Business Case reflects data

collected by Supplier during site visit and supplied by Customer and constitutes part o f the Business Case Report provided by Supplier in accordance with the M SA. When accepted by Customer in accordance with the M SA, this Business Case will be reflected in the

Service Order provided by Supplier for the given Facility and will be the basis for the Baseline Pro ject Reduction for the Facility. Pending acceptance by Customer in accordance with the terms of the M SA, it remains subject to change by agreement between the M SA

parties.”

1 Based on review with client.

2 Based on the last 36 months worth of RPI data available via Office of National Statistics (https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/bulletins/indexoflabourcostsperhourilch/octobertodecember2017)

3 Average Payback is calculated using average annual savings over the business case vs the upfront cost

Energy Price Inflation1

(Year on Year)1,50%

Component Cost Price

Inflation2

(Year on Year)

1,50%

Key Metrics

Labour Cost Price

Inflation2

(Year on Year)

1,50%

Minus

Equals

€0

€20.000

€40.000

€60.000

€80.000

€100.000

€120.000

Cu

mu

lati

ve A

nn

ual O

pera

tin

g C

ost

s

Years

Existing Operating Costs New Operating Costs (Incl. Capex)

Years Total

x 10 Years €73.950Indexed Electricity Cost

(p/kWh)€0,1400

Upfront (€46.463)Parts & Labour

Warranty (Years)10 & 10

x 10 Years €27.487

DescriptionWithout

Failures

With

Failures

Average Payback3

(Years)6,28 6,28

Existing Maintenance /

Luminaire / Annum€9,20

IRR

(10 Years)11,74% 11,74%

Existing Energy Cost

(Year 1)€9.095

ROI

(10 Years)159,16% 159,16%

New Energy Cost

(Year 1)€5.569

Savings Pot

(Energy, Maintenance & Performance)100%

Total Project Cost 63%

Net Savings 37%

Project Costs & Savings

Net SavingsCore Assumptions

Savings / Costs Savings Pot Split

² There are no contro ls specified for this pro ject and so therefore no performance savings are generated for the client.3 Inflation Excess figure is applicable to both existing and new costs over the business case length, a combination of both are used in calculating the savings figures.

“ This Business Case is provided to Customer (“ Customer” ) by FES Lighting Europe No 1 Limited (“ Supplier” ) pursuant to the arrangements between the parties set out in the M aster Services Agreement dated 17th M ay 2018 (“ M SA” ). The Business Case reflects data

collected by Supplier during site visit and supplied by Customer and constitutes part o f the Business Case Report provided by Supplier in accordance with the M SA. When accepted by Customer in accordance with the M SA, this Business Case will be reflected in the

Service Order provided by Supplier for the given Facility and will be the basis for the Baseline Pro ject Reduction for the Facility. Pending acceptance by Customer in accordance with the terms of the M SA, it remains subject to change by agreement between the M SA

parties.”

1 Based on review with client.

2 Based on the last 36 months worth of RPI data available via Office of National Statistics (https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/bulletins/indexoflabourcostsperhourilch/octobertodecember2017)

3 Average Payback is calculated using average annual savings over the business case vs the upfront cost

Energy Price Inflation1

(Year on Year)1,50%

Component Cost Price

Inflation2

(Year on Year)

1,50%

Key Metrics

Labour Cost Price

Inflation2

(Year on Year)

1,50%

Minus

Equals

€0

€20.000

€40.000

€60.000

€80.000

€100.000

€120.000

Cu

mu

lati

ve A

nn

ual O

pera

tin

g C

ost

s

Years

Existing Operating Costs New Operating Costs (Incl. Capex)

Energiebesparingen verkleiningCO2 footprint

Verbetering van verlichtingsniveau

en lichtbeleving

Verbetering van de onderhoudscyclus

d.mv. 10 jaar garantie

Rendement op uwinvestering of lighting service provider heeft

perspectief

ConclusieOmschakelen naar LED brengt met zich mee:

Parkeerbeheer Congres 2018

LED VERLICHTINGALLES IN OGENSCHOUW NEMEND

“ WAT LET ONS”