8/20/2019 Juana Esperanza Romero-Gonzalez, A097 739 329 (BIA Jan. 8, 2016)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/juana-esperanza-romero-gonzalez-a097-739-329-bia-jan-8-2016 1/4

Quiroz, Lana Esq.Law Ofices of Liana Quroz LC363 Unon AvenueElizabeth NJ 07208

Name: ROMEROGONZAEZ ANA E

U.S Departmn of Jusic

Executiv Oe r lmmgron Rew

Board . Jmigt on AppealsOfc th Ck

5107 Leesburg Pik. Sut 2(00Fall Churc. Vin 20,/I

HS/ICE Ofice o Cief Conse - HLG177 Zoy Sreearingen TX 78552

A 097739-329

Dae o his noce /8/206

ncosed s a copy of he Board's dcson nd ord n bv-renced s.

nc

Panel Members:

Neal, David LGree, Anne J.O'Heon Magaet

Scerey,

Dona rCe k

Usrt

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visitwww.irac.net/unpublished/index/

  g

  g

  p  p

Cite as: Juana Esperanza Romero-Gonzalez, A097 739 329 (BIA Jan. 8, 2016)

8/20/2019 Juana Esperanza Romero-Gonzalez, A097 739 329 (BIA Jan. 8, 2016)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/juana-esperanza-romero-gonzalez-a097-739-329-bia-jan-8-2016 2/4

Executive Ofce r Imgraon Reew

Deso o the Boad o mmiao Appeals

Fals Church, Virgini 22041

ile: A097 739 329 - inge, X

In e JUANA ESERZA ROMEROGONZALEZ

N EMOVAL PROCEEGS

APEAL

Dae

N BHAL RESPODENT: Lilina L Qoz, Eqie

ALICAIN: ecoideatio; eopnig

JAN - B 2016

The repoden has appeaed om e Imgraon Jdge' eciion a Apl 16, 2015,enng he epondens oion o ecoside he ch 10, 2015, decisio dening eespondens oion reopen poceeig in wich e w oee eoved in abena Teepen of Hoeand Scrity ha no esponded o he appea. Th appeal wll besae.

We review an miration Jdge igs of c cle eo, b esions of aw,icreion, d jdgmen, an al ote ses in appeal, are eviewed de novo. 8 C..§§ 1003(d)(3)(),(i)

We have considere e oli of e cicsace pesned hi cse, ad nd ta n

excepional iaio ha been eontaed base on he epondet tas a a inor wheshe wa reeased om the cuo of United Stas graion aoiies o her fathe whopovidd incoect ades on he beha Tese ccusaces waa reopeng o aow hresponden a oppot o have a heaing n app r eief om eoval See 8 CF.§ 00323(b)() Matter of J-J, 21 I&N Dec. 976 (BIA 1997). Accoing, e llowgods wil be eteed.

ORDER: The epondet appeal om th Immaion Jdge enal of e moon oeconse he nia of eopeg is ssaied

URE OER: Te espondns moion o ropen is gted he ecod is

remande her proceeding conssten he egoing opio n h isance of anew ecion

 

 

  

Cite as: Juana Esperanza Romero-Gonzalez, A097 739 329 (BIA Jan. 8, 2016)

8/20/2019 Juana Esperanza Romero-Gonzalez, A097 739 329 (BIA Jan. 8, 2016)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/juana-esperanza-romero-gonzalez-a097-739-329-bia-jan-8-2016 3/4

ITED SATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEEXECUIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATIO RVIEWHARLIGEN IMMIGRAT   O  !�URHARLIGEN, E

I THE ER OFJUANA ESRANZA ROMERO-GOZALEZRSPODET

Aprill 205)

)

)

)

)

Case Number A 097 739 329

In Remova ProceedingsAPPLICAIS: Motions to Reconsider

O BEHALF OF THE RESPONDELiiama L Quroz, EsqLaw Oces o Liiana L Quiroz, LC363 Union AvenueEizabeth, J 07208

O BEHALF OF THE GOVEMETAssisat Chief CounseUS Deparment of omeand Secuity77 Zoy StreetHaringe, TX 78552

OER OF HE IMMGIO JDEOn Jauary 5, 2004, he Cour ordered the respondet removed to E Savdor in bsent

pursuant to setion 240(b(5(A) of he Immigratio and Natioai Act (INA or Act he Coutdenied responents motion to reope in a wrien decision dated March 0, 205 O Apri 9, 205,the respondet ed he instant motion to reconsider The motion wi be denied

A motion to reconsider ust be led witin thiry days of he dates of entr of he naadmiistrative order of remova IA§ 240(c(6)(B It must also sate the reasos r the motonby speciig the erors of ct or aw in a prior decision remov order, d it must be suppored bypetinent auority A§ 240(c(6) 8 CF.R§ 100323(b(2); Mter ofO-SG, 24 I& Dec 56(BIA 200 A motion to reconsider requests tat the origia decision be reexained in igt ofadditiona egal arguments, a change of aw, or an argument or apect o the cae that wasoverlooked ter oRamo, 23 I& Dec 36, 38 (BIA 2002); Mtter oCern, 20 I&N Dec 99

(BIA 99)e motion to reconsider asserts tat he Cou eed in denying the motion to reopen byoveroong gumet d tat new edene ome to ne te deiodeying e moton to reopen he repondent rst ases tat te Cou ied to consder terespondent's minori at te time se was ordered removed e moton to recosder so agetat te respondents er's act of providing immgation ocias with a cttious ddress r heris anaogous to ineective assistance of counse and shoud be anayed uder section20(b )(5)(C() of the Act. Addtionay, he respondet coteds that te deadine r ing amotio to reopen to ee reef nder ACAA oud be eqtaby toed a resut of her inori

  g

  g

  p  p

8/20/2019 Juana Esperanza Romero-Gonzalez, A097 739 329 (BIA Jan. 8, 2016)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/juana-esperanza-romero-gonzalez-a097-739-329-bia-jan-8-2016 4/4

/-;.

an because e i no le of her her's negligen conu ul he Cou's Mach 0 2015wrien ecisin enyng her oon o reopen Finally he resonen seeks reconseraion as herhlren have recenly been diagnose wh ADHD an eveloenal elays.

The Cu ns he responen's oon o reconsier s el as i was le whin 30 dsof he ae h Cour ene her oion o reopen

The ur also ns ha he responen ile o rase an guens in he oion oreconsder h esablishes error in he Cour's March 10 2015 eison. The Cour exresslconsere h respones age a e e she was lace ino roeengs a orere reovea conclue ha her oon o reopen base on exceponal cirusaces was uniely. TeCo also cosiere her arguen r equable olling in ha he Cour explcily ecline oexercise is su sponte auhori o reoen. See Ramos-Bonilla v. Mkasey, 543 F.3 216218 5hCr. 008) reognng a he Fh Crcu has no recognize he ocrne of equable olling ine moion o eoen onex a hel ha a reques r equiable olling of a uniel oion o

reoen on he bass of ineecve assisace of ousel s "in essene an arguen ha he Ashoul have sa spone reoene he proceeng based upon he ocrne of equiable olling). Theresponen ha also led o e suort r her la ha a aren's negligence shoul be eaeneecve asisane of cousel uner secion 240b )5)(C)) of e A, and te Cou rejecs sucha arguen. Base on all of he above he Cour ns ha he resonen has no esablsheaeror of law o in is eision no o reopen he responen's reoval roeedings

The on also requess ha he responen's reoval roceengs be reopene in lgh ofnewl scovere evence The responen has provie eviece a her wo inor clren havebeen agnose wih ADH a soe evelopeal elays. The Cour ns ha his new evienes beyon he coe of he oon o reconser, whh onl seeks o assess the Co's ror ecsonbase on he eor of roeeng a ha e he ecision was ae. nsor as he resonenseeks rher onseraon of is newly-sube eviene suh a reqes is n he nure of a new

oion o reoen, whch is nuberbarre. See 8 C.F.R § 1003.2b) 4)) proving ha o oneoon o reoen seeking rescisson of a n absenia orer enere n reoval proceeings ay bele).

Aorngl, he llowng orers shall be enere:

ORDER: he responen's oon o reconsier is DEND.

av AyalaUed Saes Imgraon Judge

2

      g           g     p  p