Cost Voume Profit

download Cost Voume Profit

of 33

Transcript of Cost Voume Profit

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    1/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 1

    Cost ManagementMeasuring, Monitoring, and Motivating Performance

    Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    2/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 2

    Chapter 3: Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis

    Learning objectives Q1: What is cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis, and how is it

    used for decision making?

    Q2: How are CVP calculations performed for a single

    product? Q3: How are CVP calculations performed for multiple

    products?

    Q4: What is the breakeven point?

    Q5: What assumptions and limitations should managersconsider when using CVP analysis?

    Q6: How are the margin of safety and operating leverageused to assess operational risk?

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    3/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 3

    units

    $

    Total Costs (TC)

    Total Revenue (TR)

    Q1,Q4: CVP Analysis and the Breakeven Point

    The breakeven point (BEP) is where total revenueequal total costs.

    CVP analysis looks at the relationship betweenselling prices, sales volumes, costs, and profits.

    BEP in units

    BEP insales $

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    4/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 4

    Q1: How is CVP Analysis Used?

    CVP analysis can determine, both in units and insales dollars:

    the volume required to break even

    the volume required to achieve target profit levels the effects of discretionary expenditures

    the selling price or costs required to achieve

    target volume levels CVP analysis helps analyze the sensitivity of profits

    to changes in selling prices, costs, volume andsales mix.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    5/33

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    6/33

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    7/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 7

    Bills Briefcases makes high quality cases for laptops that sell for $200.The variable costs per briefcase are $80, and the total fixed costs are$360,000. Find the BEP in units and in sales $ for this company.

    Q2: Breakeven Point Calculations

    BEP in unitsF

    P V

    !

    $360,000

    $200 /unit $80 /unit!

    $360,0003,000 units

    $120/unit! !

    ( ) /F

    P V P!

    $360,000$600,000

    60%! !

    BEP in sales $ 0FCMR

    ! $360,000($200 $80)/ $200

    !

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    8/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 8

    units

    $1000s TC

    TR

    3000

    $600

    Q2: CVP Graph

    Draw a CVP graph for Bills Briefcases. What is the pretax profit if Billsells 4100 briefcases? If he sells 2200 briefcases? Recall that P=$200, V= $80, and F= $360,000.

    $360

    41002200

    Profit at 4100 units =$120 x 4100 - $360,000.

    $132,000

    -$96,000

    Profit at 2200 units = $120 x 2200 - $360,000.

    More easily: 4100 units is 1100 units past BEP,so profit = $120 x 1100 units; 2200 units is 800units before BEP, so loss = $120 x 800 units.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    9/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 9

    How many briefcases does Bill need to sell to reach a target pretaxprofit of $240,000? What level of sales revenue is this? Recall that P=$200, V= $80, and F= $360,000.

    Q2: CVP Calculations

    Units needed to

    reach targetpretax profit

    rofitF

    P V

    !

    $360,000 $240,000

    $120/unit

    !

    5,000 units!

    $600,000$1,000,000

    60%! !

    ( ) /

    F

    P V P!

    Sales $ required

    to reach targetpretax profit

    $ 0,000F

    CMR

    !

    Of course, 5,000 units x$200/unit = $1,000,000,

    too.But sometimes you onlyknow the CMR and not

    the selling price perunit, so this is still avaluable formula.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    10/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 10

    How many briefcases does Bill need to sell to reach a target after-taxprofit of $319,200 if the tax rate is 30%? What level of sales revenue isthis? Recall that P= $200, V= $80, and F= $360,000.

    Q2: CVP Calculations

    First convert the target after-tax profit to its target pretax profit:

    After-tax profit $319,200Pretax profit $456,000(1 Tax rate) (1 0.3)

    ! ! !

    Units needed toreach target

    pretax profit

    $360,000 $456,0006,800 units

    $120/unit

    ! !

    Sales $ neededto reach target

    pretax profit

    $360,000 $456,000$1,360,000

    60%

    ! !

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    11/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 11

    Suppose that Bills marketing department says that he can sell 6,000briefcases if the selling price is reduced to $170. Bills target pretaxprofit is $210,000. Determine the highest level that his variable costscan so that he can make his target. Recall that F= $360,000.

    Q1,2: Using CVP to Determine Target Cost Levels

    Use the CVP formula for units, but solve for V:

    Q = 6,000 units $360,000 $210,000

    $170/unit V

    !

    If Bill can reduce his variable costs to $75/unit, he can meet his goal.

    $75/unitV !

    $360,000 $210,000$170/ it $95/ it

    6,000 its

    V

    ! !

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    12/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 12

    Q5: Uncertainties in Bills Decision

    After this analysis, Bill needs to consider severalissues before deciding to lower his price to$170/unit.

    How reliable are his marketing departments estimates?

    Is a $5/unit decrease in variable costs feasible?

    Will this decrease in variable costs affect product quality?

    If 6,000 briefcases is within his plants capacity but lowerthan his current sales level, will the increased productionaffect employee morale or productivity?

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    13/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 13

    Q1: Using CVP to Compare Alternatives

    CVP analysis can compare alternative coststructures or selling prices.

    high salary/low commission vs. lower salary/highercommission for sales persons

    highly automated production process with low variablecosts per unit vs. lower technology process with highervariable costs per unit and lower fixed costs.

    The indifference point between alternatives is thelevel of sales (in units or sales $) where the profits ofthe alternatives are equal.

    broad advertising campaign with higher selling prices vs.minimal advertising and lower selling prices

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    14/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 14

    Currently Bills salespersons have salaries totaling $80,000 (includedin F of $360,000) and earn a 5% commission on each unit ($10 perbriefcase). He is considering an alternative compensation arrangementwhere the salaries are decreased to $35,000 and the commission isincreased to 20% ($40 per briefcase). Compute the BEP in units underthe proposed alternative. Recall that P= $200 and V= $80 currently.

    Q1,2: Using CVP to Compare Alternatives

    First compute Fand Vunder the proposed plan:

    F= $360,000 - $45,000 decrease in salaries = $315,000

    V= $80 + $30 increase in commission = $110

    Then compute Q under the proposed plan:

    Unitsneeded tobreakeven

    0FQ

    P V

    ! !

    $315,0003,500 units

    $200 /unit - $110/unit! !

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    15/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 15

    Q1: Determining the Indifference Point

    Compute the volume of sales, in units, for which Bill is indifferentbetween the two alternatives.

    The indifference point in units is the Q for which the profit equationsof the two alternatives are equal.

    Current Plan Proposed PlanContribution margin per unit $120 $90

    Total fixed costs $360,000 $315,000

    Profit (current plan) = $120Q - $360,000

    Profit (proposed plan) = $90Q - $315,000

    $120Q - $360,000 = $90Q - $315,000

    $30Q = $45,000 Q = 1,500 units

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    16/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 16

    Q1,2: CVP Graphs of the Indifference Point

    Draw a CVP graph for Bills that displays the costs under bothalternatives. Notice that the total revenue line for both alternatives isthe same, but the total cost lines are different.

    TC-current plan

    TR

    units

    $1000s

    3000

    $600

    $360

    3500

    $315

    TC-proposed plan

    1500

    BEP for thecurrent plan

    BEP for theproposed plan

    indifference point between the plans

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    17/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 17

    TC-current plan

    TR

    units

    $1000s

    3000

    $600

    Q1,2: Comparing Alternatives

    $360

    3500

    $315

    TC-proposed plan

    1500

    The current plan breaks even before the proposed plan.

    At 1500 units, the plans have the same total cost.

    Each unit soldprovides a larger

    contribution to profitsunder the current

    plan.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    18/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 18

    Q5: Uncertainties in Bills Decision

    Hopefully Bill is currently selling more than 1500briefcases, because profits are negative underBOTH plans at this point.

    Therefore, it seems the current plan is preferable tothe proposed plan.

    However, . . .

    The total costs of the current plan are less than thethose of the proposed plan at sales levels past1500 briefcases.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    19/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 19

    Q5: Uncertainties in Bills Decision

    . . . this may not be true because the level of futuresales is always uncertain.

    What if the briefcases were a new product line?

    The plans may create different estimates of thelikelihood of various sales levels.

    Estimates of sales levels may be highly uncertain. The lower fixed costs of the proposed plan may be

    safer.

    Salespersons may have an incentive to sell moreunits under the proposed plan.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    20/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 20

    Q3: CVP Analysis for Multiple Products

    When a company sells more than one product theCVP calculations must be adjusted for the salesmix. The sales mix should be stated as a proportion

    of total units sold when performing CVP

    calculations for in units.

    of total revenues when performing CVP

    calculations in sales $.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    21/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 21

    Q3: Sales Mix Computations

    The weighted average contribution margin is theweighted sum of the products contribution margins:ni 1 i iP! where i is product is % of total sales

    in units, CMi is product is contributionmargin, and n= the number ofproducts.

    ni=1 i i

    CM CMK!where Ki is product is % of totalsales revenues, CMRi is product iscontribution margin ratio, and n=the number of products.

    The weighted average contribution margin ratio isthe weighted sum of the products contribution

    margin ratios:

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    22/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 22

    Peggys Kitchen Wares sells three sizes of frying pans. Next year shehopes to sell a total of 10,000 pans. Peggys total fixed costs are$40,800. Each products selling price and variable costs is givenbelow. Find the BEP in units for this company.

    Q3: Multiple Product Breakeven Point

    Small Medium Large Total

    Expected sales in units 2,000 5,000 3,000 10,000

    Selling price per unit $10.00 $15.00 $18.00

    Variable costs per unit $4.00 $8.00 $11.00

    Contribution margin per unit $6.00 $7.00 $7.00

    First note the sales mix in units is 20%:50%:30%, respectively; thencompute the weighted average contribution margin:

    CM = 20%x$6 + 50%x$7 + 30%x$7 = $6.80

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    23/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 23

    Q3: Multiple Product Breakeven Point

    But 6,000 units is not really the BEP in units; the BEP is only 6,000 units ifthe sales mix remains the same.

    Next, compute the BEP in terms of total units:Total unitsneeded tobreakeven

    0FQ

    P V

    ! !

    $40,8006,000 units

    $6.80/unit! !

    The BEP should be stated in terms of how many of each unit must be sold:

    Units re uired to brea even:Small ans 0 , 00

    edium ans 0 ,000

    ar e ans 0 ,800

    6,000

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    24/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 24

    Find the BEP in sales $ for Peggys Kitchen Wares. The total revenueand total variable cost information below is based on the expectedsales mix.

    Q3: Multiple Product Breakeven Point

    First compute the weighted average contribution margin ratio:

    WACMR = (20/149)x60% + (75/149)x46.7% + (54/149)x38.9% =

    ma Medium arge ota

    xpected sa es in units 2,000 5,000 3,000 10,000

    ota revenue 20,000 75,000 54,000 149,000

    ota variab e costs 8,000 40,000 33,000 81,000

    ota contribution margin 12,000 35,000 21,000 68,000

    Contribution margin ratio 60.0% 46.7% 38.9% 45.6%

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    25/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 25

    Q3: Multiple Product Breakeven Point

    Next compute the BEP in sales $:

    . . . = 45.6%, of course! Depending on how the giveninformation is structured, it may be easier to compute theCMR as Total contribution margin/Total revenue.

    BEP in sales $ 0FCMR

    !

    $40, 00 $89,4740.456

    ! ! *

    * If you sum the number of units of each size pan requiredat breakeven times its selling price you get $89,400. Theextra $74 in the answer above comes from rounding the

    contribution margin ratio to three decimals.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    26/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 26

    Q6: Margin of Safety

    The margin of safety is a measure of how far pastthe breakeven point a company is operating, orplans to operate. It can be measured 3 ways.

    margin of

    safety in units

    actual or estimated units of

    activity BEP in units

    =

    margin ofsafety in $

    actual or estimated sales $ BEP in sales $

    =

    margin ofsafety

    percentage

    = argin of safety in units

    ctual or estimated units

    argin of safety in $

    ctual or estimated sales $!

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    27/33

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    28/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 28

    Q6: Degree of Operating Leverage

    The degree of operating leverage measures theextent to which the cost function is comprised offixed costs.

    A high degree of operating leverage indicates a

    high proportion of fixed costs. Businesses operating at a high degree of operating

    leverage

    but enjoy profits that rise more quickly when salesincrease.

    face higher risk of loss when sales decrease,

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    29/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 29

    Q6: Degree of Operating Leverage

    The degree of operating leverage can be computed3 ways.

    Contribution margin

    Profit

    i ed costs+1

    Profit

    1

    Margin of safety percentage

    degree of

    operating =

    leverage

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    30/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 30

    Suppose that Bills Briefcases has budgeted next years sales at 5,000units. Compute Bills degree of operating leverage. Recall that P=$200, V= $80, F= $360,000, and the margin of safety percentage at5,000 units is 40%.

    Q6: Degree of Operating Leverage

    First, compute contribution margin and profit at 5,000 units:

    Profit = $600,000 - $360,000 = $240,000

    $600,000Degree of operating le erage = = 2.5

    $240,000

    Contribution margin = ($200 - $80) x 5,000 = $600,000

    1or, degree of operating le erage = = 2.5

    40%

    $360,000or, degree of operating le erage = + 1 = 2.5$240,000

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    31/33

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    32/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 32

    Q5: Assumptions in CVP Analysis

    CVP analysis assumes that costs and revenues arelinear within a relevant range of activity.

    Linear total revenues means that selling prices per unitare constant and the sales mix does not change.

    If volume discounts are received from suppliers, thenvariable costs per unit are not constant.

    Offering volume discounts to customers violates this assumption.

    Linear total costs means total fixed costs are constantand variable costs per unit are constant.

    If worker productivity changes as activity levels change,then variable costs per unit are not constant.

  • 8/7/2019 Cost Voume Profit

    33/33

    3/19/2011 Slide # 33

    Q5: Assumptions in CVP Analysis

    These assumptions may induce a small relevantrange.

    Results of CVP calculations must be checked to see ifthey fall within the relevant range.

    Nonlinear analysis techniques are available.

    Linear CVP analysis may be inappropriate if thelinearity assumptions hold only over small rangesof activity.

    For example, regression analysis, along with nonlineartransformations of the data, can be used to estimatenonlinear cost and revenue functions.