Appendix C C.pdf · # 2. r. oj. 1/5. project data: notes : ln ‘5 = o o. 1. all. lightingmust be...

Traffic Study

Appendix C

MISSION OAKS BOULEVARD INDUSTRIAL PROJECTCITY OF CAMARILLO,CALIFORNIA

TRAFFIC STUDY

I1 BGATE! /:

iimjiHuimimHa

ipjmmnflimnn lift 111 IJIjmimiroimiiiiiiniiiimami«iv *

luiiajiuinjijilllim • ;sgp IaSmi a!X\\w\ '7-.:%/.

1/ )\ li=7; .. \ pelflI I . / > > m

=3 Hc ;>\mN 8;L34 :?«v '.W l h dSB 1muij tTTTTkwiMilAW;? ! s*«siNib1'Si ' iil K'gyVjII»

4lfi Blet nun t i

i i\v

Ias iin'mmj. LL sfUifiiiei»rfff 'fff- « i SJIBsai—H—— —1——*— •

""»*^4H+IM piBp11111Ik

a 3uttiixrw *ni am I«1*fi* W•m* 1MNV*V» W

=&y$\ _ r\ «1-—'

BUILDINGW SF

rETmurE KiSTINC!iroTAUw- I s

!! I CUffH nr

1 ili=a -J- -r—t — 1"

iSI

" :« ± =I 1

I I I Iiff? I I I

M" r v i* yt & ar-F/y tWKIIII4FsSs

;:=AI

ji i

I»ihi9 V'.rrfH:w) ^3=-l191017 -v ••• — MM;&-Z.ii

1*i :i, Y: 1 —i—r\S

I I I7T3 i iiTANK • v • 18 li 1 A~*-E »7 .' -'Z ' ' - •

Jig® AV ;T:...

V ?re. • 1

Ps•a ”

Xmnm :

i I i i i :S

ATE Project #19091February 20, 2020 I

Prepared for:

Rincon Consultant Inc.1800 North AshwoodVentura, CA 93003

'

t

ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERSIII

100 N. Hope Avenue, Suite 4, Santa Barbara, CA 93110-1686 •(805) 687-4418 •FAX (805) 682-8509

^11 ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS100 N. Hope Avenue,Suite 4, Santa Barbara, CA 93110 •(805)687-4418 * FAX(805)682-8509 •ma/n<S>atesb.com

Since 1978

Richard L. Pool, P.E.Scott A. Schell, AICP, PTP

February 20, 2020

Mr. Joe PowerRincon Consultants, Inc.1800 North AshwoodVentura, CA 93003

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE MISSION OAKS INDUSTRIAL PROJECT - CITY OF CAMARILLO,CALIFORNIA

j

Associated Transportation Engineers (ATE) is pleased to submit the following traffic study for theMission Oaks Industrial Project. The traffic study examines existing and future traffic conditionsin the vicinity of the Project site. It is our understanding that this traffic study will be incorporatedinto the development application for the Project to be submitted to the City of Camarillo.We appreciate the opportunity to assist Rincon Consultants Inc., with this Project.

Associated Transportation Engineers

Scott A. Schell, AICP, PTPVice President

Engineering •Planning •Parking •Signal Systems •Impact Reports •Bikeways •Transit

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 1

PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1

EXISTING CONDITIONSStreet NetworkIntersection Operations

114

IMPACT THRESHOLDSCity of Camarillo

7i7

PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFICProject Trip GenerationProject Trip Distribution and Assignment

889

POTENTIAL TRAFFIC IMPACTSProject-Specific Impacts

99

CUMULATIVE (EXISTING + APPROVED/PENDING PROJECTS) ANALYSISCumulative Impacts

1314

STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND REFERENCES 18

TECHNICAL APPENDIX 19

i

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Existing Intersection Operations

Intersection Thresholds Criteria

Project Trip Generation

Project Trip Distribution

Existing + Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Operations . .Existing + Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations . . .Approved/Pending Development Projects Trip Generation . .Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Operations

Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations

7

Table 2 7

Table 3 8

Table 4 9

Table 5 12

Table 6 12

Table 7 13

Table 8 14

Table 9 17

LIST OF FIGURES

Project Site Location/Existing Street Network

Project Site Plan

Existing Traffic Volumes

Existing Lane Geometries and Traffic Controls

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment . . .Existing + Project Traffic Volumes

Cumulative Traffic Volumes

Cumulative + Project Traffic Volumes

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

2

3

5

6

10

11

15

16

I I

INTRODUCTION

The following study contains an analysis of the potential traffic impacts associated with theproposed Mission Oaks Boulevard Industrial Project (the "Project")/ located at 3233 MissionOaks Boulevard in the City of Camarillo. Project site location is illustrated on Figure 1. Thestudy provides information relative to Existing,Existing + Project,Cumulative and Cumulative+ Project traffic conditions within the Project study-area.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Mission Oaks Boulevard Industrial Project consists of the demolition of an existing 52,500square-foot office building currently occupied by Technicolor Home Entertainment Services,the construction of anew 111,500 square-foot multi-tenant industrial buildingand the additionof 52,026 square-feet to an existing industrial building. Site access will be provided viaexistingdriveway connections toMission Oaks Boulevard and CalleTecate. Figure 2 illustratesthe Project site plan.

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Street Network

The study-area circulation system is comprised of U.S. Highway 101,State Route 34,MissionOaks Boulevard, Flynn Road, Adolfo Road, Dawson Drive, Village at the Park Drive, PetitStreet and Dawson Place which serve as the major arterials, and collector streets,as illustratedin Figure 1. The following text provides a brief discussion of the primary components of thestudy-area street network.U.S. Highway 101, located south of the site, is a multi-lane freeway which serves as a majorarterial for the City of Camarillo and is the principal inter-city route along this portion of thePacific Coast. The segment of U.S. Highway 101 in the study-area is 6-lanes with auxiliary on-off ramp lanes. Primary access between the freeway and the Project site is provided via thesignalized hook ramps at Mission Oaks Boulevard and Village at the Park Drive.State Route 34, (Pleasant Valley Road/Lewis Road) in the study-area is a 2- to 4-lane north-south primary arterial. State Route 34 connects the City of Camarillo and City of Oxnard. StateRoute 34 serves industrial, commercial and residential land uses in the study-area.

Mission Oaks Boulevard, is a 4-lane roadway that extends south from Upland Road thentransitions to Dawson Drive at U.S. Highway 101. Mission Oaks Boulevard serves industrialand commercial land uses in the study-area. Mission Oaks Boulevard provides direct accessto Project site via two existing driveway connections.

Mission Oaks Boulevard Industrial ProjectTraffic Study

Associated Transportation EngineersFebruary 20, 20201

7cnoLU CT\C7.

D UJH<u I

ru_

:

oh- fLUZLULUC .H

$ML1L3i.\V

CO: H!

Ozcor

X ;:LU

zV.VOI v \ ol.vA ’*- lA <>

? D< ' <B ' 'ft u

* O•.-> '5 Vv.-k .\ LU

1CO•te:-i

u‘1!.:A

LU*

o* 'Ye ••••'

CL:A W *r ' u{Ys . pv rc&>

1i

zoi=<2 Y)t- o “

fsSiifeUJLU< D_

m Zuifi| o 5 uLO 5in cd Z< h LU

«1:11

: . . V •...

VAssociated Transportation Engineers

February 20, 2020Mission Oaks Boulevard Industrial ProjectTraffic Study 2

r# 2OJ 1/5 NOTES :PROJECT DATA:Ln ‘5=O O T1. ALL LIGHTING MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH

THE CAMARILLO MUNICIPAL CODE (CMC 19.44.2S0).LIGHTING MUSTBE INDIRECT.HOODED.AND ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT AWAYFROM ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND STREETS.LIGHT STANDARDSMAY NOT EXCEED 20 FEET IN HaGHT.2. ALL EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURES MUST COMPLY WITHCURRENT CITY STANDARD S-1AND INCLUDE A SOLID COVER

CO =3 PARKING ANALYSIS:Zoning: Ml (Light Manufacturing Zone) Parking Required: 2 / 1C00 SFoC

t *CL DJ Proposed Building A :TT15C0 SFParking Required:1T1500 X 2 /1000 =

— 1389,128 SFLot Area</5 5223 Stalls .* mmmmoo Proposed Building 3:51,810 SFParking Required: 51810 X 2 /1000 =

(E) Warehouse 402,823 SF

(0 Office

(N) Bulldlng-A(N) Buildlng-B

O BUILDINGS:C 104 StaHs4,800 SFCD Existing Warehouse Building: 402,823 SF

Parking Required: 402,823 X 2 /1000 = 806 StallsTWK« ZhCUWtC PLHi A '!*M* rUYATICTI

< 111,500 SF£D51810 SF Existing Office Building:4,800 SF

Parking Required:4,800 X 2 /1000 =6Q.

10 Stalls3 Total: 570,933 SFCLC FAR: 411 % 570,933 / 1,389,128 = 411 % Total Parking Required: 1143 Stalls

(10% Reduced = 114 Stalls)1,029 Stalls

Ln mwDttffiacuwffloi 0 PtfXorWg ELEVAT1CKBM*

LEGENDLandscape Required:Landscape Provided:

1389,128 - 570,933 = 818,195 x10% = 81819 SF

= 88,000 SF10.7%“O Total Parking Provided: • OUTDOOR LUNCH• AREA1,073 Stalls

PAVEMENTOCD EXISTING PARKING

TO REMAINNEW PARKINGAREAn 4* WIDE ADA PATHU3XmXJXOJ7Zf>

Note: All parking areas are existing to be modified£ unless noted otherwise.[0GATE<a 1807.00'PL AOJACSVT LANDSCAPEPI

Cl IIIHffllIHlipiE \TmMBlImEfl JmuMMI- IDJMEIMSlLDMl => bisENTRANCE: .--"' /9 . t

l I\e* 3

% *ITBI/—Iki il ®2 m c :ITU : ! 5 c:

=;|t\ivr-; rm ft•j *LO <L! .o1

>i3 If - -• wS L.A A

l &— > » ®I>u ' PROPOSED -

sfe r ®:x\v :euw»«.:.;v.;.vv.

m GEL d. . i:ii: 05LO c:IV *UNIT M UNIT L UNIT K UNIT J

*12.173 SF «12080 SF *12881 SF •12460 SF $- SPACES)osmaiKueM1224 SP.(TENANT AACAJrtntn «» tamer utM

•SZ284 SF.(TOTALINTT AA«

DBUttU <. Bffiffluajjwuc

*3S2»SF.(TENANT ARCAJ -«A30J&J0eDCC I«A5«31709 SF.(TOTAL UMT ARA)

•SV71 SF.nBHWTAICAi•oasuiijoeBCtABeAi c

ifmiti

tamjcjornccAncAi

EXISTING BUILDINGTOTAL 111219 SF

*w»BF.croTAL UMT AIW«28750 SF.(TOTAL UMT AAAJ

2c:TOTAL 51810 SF EXISTING BUILDINGTOTAL 291,604 SF

UNTTQUNIT N UNIT P UNIT R ai !13260 SF*13,173 SF 13260 SF *15,152 SF Ci

: \OF.[7ENAHT AREAJ: ARMi: •M0OO &F.[TOTAL UNfT AAAj!i 399.6’

V VV V V V V V V

7M7wm ••!• -i#-u at

, JMpu -nrrmu: Ba®

O l—i CO: w> m*BtB if.(TOTAL UMT ARM

—— — ^LD fS; TryLD © it : OCSTWUWL37

•XJXt 6T.CTEKANT AKA 05O E ; 199.0’A gyfpeace MWK2n2S A2U47 SP.OOTAL UNTT AAA)-

•rrT.t nnn-I- i1 S—If ' -—:ifA

I) CftWD[ 52£TzSC^2SL$ sO TCD 1»TANK *"*i'3 - .Tjt /•v -Q.

jQ® i a if ® S| 1213'-5^-

si#201.3’1L

Ilf ©«in-® II® : ® i \ © n ®^ # i1

=3 -HTLO - r

pj-T3 .ill"!

i iJ.iu.Tl 1 iofD NOT A PARTi : ;Z iO) .

c NOT TO SCALEDJ O

m ASSOCIATEDT RANSPORTATION

E NGINEERS

ho FIGURE^mu lifeera

° sO U5

PROJECT SITE PLANNO

JH - ATE#19091

W.7ZZ!Z'<3->-r£i?

Adolfo Road, is a 4-lane roadway that extends east from Ponderosa Drive to its terminus at theConejo Creek. Adolfo Road serves residential, commercial and industrial land uses in thestudy-area.

Flynn Road, is a 4-lane roadway that extends south from Upland Road to Mission OaksBoulevard. Flynn Road serves residential, commercial and industrial land uses in the study-area.Dawson Drive, located south of the site, is a 2-lane north-south roadway that provides accessto the commercial and residential area located south of U.S. Highway 101. Dawson Driveextends north from Pleasant Valley Road and transitions into Mission Oaks Boulevard northof U.S. Highway 101.

Petit Street, located south of the site is a 3-lane east-west roadway that extends from DawsonDrive to Village at the Park Drive where it provides access to from southbound U.S. Highway101. Petit Street provides access to the commercial and residential area south of U.S. Highway101.

Dawson Place, is a 2-lane east-west roadway that extends from Dawson Drive to State Route34. Dawson Place serves commercial and industrial land uses in the study-area.In rating an intersection's operating condition, "Levels of Service" (LOS) " A" through "F" areused. LOS "A" and LOS "B" represent primarily free-flow operations, LOS "C" representsstable conditions, LOS "D" nears unstable operations with restrictions on maneuverabilitywithin traffic streams, LOS "E" represents unstable operations with maneuverability verylimited, and LOS "F" represents breakdown or forced flow conditions. LOS “C" is consideredacceptable in the City of Camarillo.Intersection Operations

Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were collected for this study in January of2020. Figure 3 illustrates the existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Existing levelsof service for the study-area intersections were calculated using the adopted IntersectionCapacity Utilization methodology for intersections as required by the City of Camarillo.Worksheets illustrating the level of service calculations are contained in the TechnicalAppendix. Table 1 lists theexisting intersection level of service forthe study-area intersections.The existing lane geometries and traffic controls forthe study-area intersections are illustratedon Figure 4.



=< 204 ui

ui

n 21 2 2O 4a.4 Vi -* co UJ co2W -1 E

NJ CDW O CO0O-i .15

*—(88)169-—(304)486

^—(170)176[Adolfo Rd

*— (52)94—(298)472(—(79)70

o ^U1 MNJ <4> Ut<43 VI ON

J3CCL NJ <43 O'*

ON^04*< 70

ui J t L J 1 LCO [Adolfo RdO39(63)—*339(604)—31(36) y

i t r 280(200)—*387(617)—•-65(261)—y

c r0< NJ.fc. NJUJ NJ Ul —..—i ^4a. NJ UJ

£ £NJ 4a.4a*CN NJUl 4a.

Q_4a. 4a. NJ

<43 UlCo NJ=3

Q-Cui

3 4SUJ 4a.O'O'O' cW O fc =Clfod LZUJ NJ u> —UJ 4a. Ul

coioUJ UJ

ON Ulco coNJ NJUJ —<

4a. —<

035*—(130)64—(150)219

j—(446)447

“O toDo.

03 J l L J lnIMission Oaks Blvd i tQPetit St li1 r229(528)—* 149(76)—*

174(78)—y

£382(562)—- NJ —i

Ul 4a.NJ —<

-1 NJON —‘

—|O'fcjc® a —* 4a153(118)—y z caS w—1 —1 NJ

<5 1<43 NJ=NI >

65 o 24a.NJNJ UiNJ 4NNJ ^0O O—< NJ

ONUJ

2 *—(957)472

y—(59)62

O'4a. UJ *—(51)65(5)9

I—(26)32

> OjQ CD UJ —1

ON Ul Ul

Ul J I L! L [ Petit St [Dawson PI

137(56)—*1 r i1 r18(0 ventura BlvdUJ UJNJ coNJ ’—J

NJ NJ NJ4.UCNJ -C 4a.O CD

90(68)—y

Ui<43O

87 QNJ UJ —<Ui O Oj<D VI ~NO UN —a S—1 4a. —* -*<43 UJ NJ —

UJT3Ul s*—(236)247—(353)724

I—(358)279

> *—(73)60—(550)975£ £UJ Ul

Oaw's0"J I L J LPleasant Valiev Rd Pleasant Valley Rd

207(199)—*384(563)—17(8) yit r 112(309)—*585(763)—> Ul NJ NJ4a. UJ UlulSci<43 4a.4a.

NJ —<

UJ 4a.

UlonOn030Q_030c/iT3Ti o0 ^—(XX)XX - (AM)PM Peak Hour VolumeC"

03c NOT TO SCALEOCo—s 0NC Am ASSOCIATED

T RANSPORTATION

E NGINEERS

FIGURE 3NJ 0 muo era EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES0NJ0O 0NJ 55/ JH - ATE#19091O ui

=? 2CD m

mn oCO ^|o

*5- e- **r cin

co i slAdolfo Rd Adolfo RdOc JJro<CDQ_=3CLC</)

CD

TJO'CDn

Mission Oaks Blvd

CQ» z5

3

5 ro

Ji£

rB |Dawson PI

J Ventura Blvdr8 o - Signalized Intersection§

$*r «3

^ - Stopped Approach

- Lane Geometry

* Yield

0av.'S°n^6

Pleasant Valiev Rd§Pleasant Valley Rd

6>cncSi

in % 3o onPleasant Valley RdCD

r-t* 8 — 7CDCL

—ICD=3t-n-n §

cr c? NCDc NOT TO SCALECD O

^ 3A£ S1

-P CTQNJO Oto ^O V)

ASSOCIATEDT RANSPORTATION

E NGINEERS

FIGUREEXISTING LANE GEOMETRIES AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS

JH - ATE#19091

SgONKRBKBSSS&BES

Table 1Existing Intersection Operations

Existing Conditions

PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour

Intersection Control ICU-LOS ICU-LOS

Lewis Rd./Adolfo Rd. Signal 0.59-LOS A 0.54-LOS A

Flynn Rd./Adolfo Rd. Signal 0.41-LOS A 0.54-LOS A

Dawson Dr./Petit St. Signal 0.48-LOS A 0.42-LOS A

Lewis Rd./Dawson PI. Signal 0.32-LOS A 0.43-LOS A

Pleasant Valley Rd./Dawson Dr. Signal 0.47-LOS A 0.62-LOS B

Pleasant Valley Rd./Lewis Rd. Signal 0.49-LOS A 0.49-LOS A

U.S. Highway 101NB Ramps/Mission Oaks Blvd, Signal 0.50-LOS A 0.40-LOS A

U.S. Highway 101 SB Ramps/Village at the Park Signal 0.67-LOS B 0.44-LOS A

The study-area intersections generally operate in the LOS A - B range during the AM and PMpeak hour periods as indicated in Table 1.

IMPACT THRESHOLDS

City of Camarillo

The City of Camarillo's acceptable level of service for intersections is LOS C or better, withLOS D (V/C 0.83) allowed for short periods of time during the peak hours periods. Projectimpacts are significant and must be mitigated if they exceed the thresholds listed in Table 2.Mitigation measures must provide a level of service equal to or better than the baseconditions.

Table 2Intersection Threshold Criteria

Existing + Project; Cumulative + Project Per Lane Critical Project-AddedPeak Hour Trips

30 Trips20 Trips10 Trips

LOS DLOS ELOS F



PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC

Project Trip Generation

Trip generation estimates were calculated for the Mission Oaks Boulevard Industrial Projectbased on the rates presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation,10th Edition for General Light Industrial (Land-Use Code #110) and Single Tenant Office (LandUse #715).1 Technicolor Home Entertainment is the current occupant of the existing officebuilding proposed to be demolished. Technicolor's current employment level is 113 people.Table 3 summarizes the average daily, AM and PM peak hourtrip generation estimates fortheProject.

Table 3Project Trip Generation Comparison

PM Peak HourAM Peak HourADTTrips (In/Out)Employees/Size Trips (In/Out)Land Use TripsRate Rate Rate

Existing Use:Office Space 58 (9/49)60 (53/7)113 Employees 3.77 426 0.53 0.50

Proposed Use:Light IndustrialLight Industrial

78 (69/9)36 (32/4)

70 (9/61)33 (4/29)

111,500 S.F.52,056 S.F.

4.96 553 0.70 0.630.634.96 258 0.70

103 (13/90)114 (101/13)Total Proposed Trip Generation: 811

+54 (48/6) + 45 (4/41)Net Change Trip Generation: +385

The data presented in Table 3 show that the existing office space with 113 employeesgenerates 426 average daily trips, 60 AM peak hour trips and 58 PM peak hour trips. TheProject would generate 811 average daily trips, 114 AM peak hour trips and 103 PM peakhour trips. The Project would result in a net increase of 385 average daily trips, 54 AM peakhour trips and 45 PM peak hour trips.

Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 10th Edition, 2017.


Mission Oaks Boulevard Industrial ProjectTraffic Study 8

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment

Project-generated traffic was distributed and assigned to the study-area street system aspresented in Table 4. Figure 5 illustrates the distribution and assignment of project-generatedtraffic volumes.

Table 4Project Trip Distribution

Origin/DestinationRoute PercentU.S. Ftighway 101 East 25%

West 25%

NorthSouth

State Route 34 15%5%

Pleasant Valley Road East 5%West 10%

Adolfo Road West 5%

Flynn Road North 5%

Mission Oaks Boulevard East 5%

Total: 100%

POTENTIAL TRAFFIC IMPACTS

Project-Specific Impacts

Intersections. Tables 9 and 10 present the Existing and Existing + Project AM and PM peakhour intersection levels of service and identifies impacts based on the City of Camarillothresholds. Figure 6 illustrates the AM and PM peak hour Existing + Project traffic volumes.



H 2 rOJ mcnn oLO =5

21 5 2_ ! cJ.u.*—(1)6—(0)2

£ O oCL ID NJ•Nt•< /sin LCO lAdolfo Rd jAdolfo RdO

1 tCm< 3s

CO NJ1(10)-)ID

Q-DQ_C

3 42 mDJc

1 5“0 *—A

3oV—. (2)0NJ NJ

CD j jnIMission Oaks 8lvd

QPetit St 1100 )-*2(0)10(2) )

*3 10(2)—* £j;

M h-NJZ <o &5

3 >

5 6D 2.25 *-(12)1 Daily Drl—JIa o—‘ NJOD

l LoIPetit St |Dawson PI

Centura Blvdoo

25%

7 8 Q2 I

I *—(5)05QJo ^ -L—1 O

(2)0na'A,s°nJ J L

Pleasant Valley Rd Pleasant Valley Rd

1(0)-* 1(5)-*1KO:> NJ2(0)—)in OcnOn

raCLHIDZ5cn

"C3n OCDcr 3IDr—1-c NOT TO SCALEID O

•< m ASSOCIATEDT RANSPORTATION

E NCINEERS

FIGURENJ D m\ \o era PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENTO C)

NJ SDO C/5 yvs JH - ATE#19091

H 2m

n 2O g s4a.u N OWOU)

^ ui To -SNO CD O'* *—CD VI US

4^ VI —' cO W C0|—‘ US —i u.

o n

*—(89)175(304)488

j—(170)176

<~4* *— (52)94—(298)472r-(79)70

OcQ_ tO LO O'OJ OJ ACUvC 7Tcn J I L J l LCO lAdoifo Rd Adolfo RdC

39(63)—*339(607)—31 (36) }

280(200)—*387(617)—66(271) j

c r r03< 4a4 N U)

ho Ja. hoUs vi LnL^ SL3

COCL

4a. 4a hocD LnOJ ho

KJ 4 -fc'-J JOUS O'*=3

CLCC/3

3 4gus 4s,oa O'* c>b O Ji

US USO' Ulco S2VI ho4a. ->•CT3 -1

cuC 5*— (130)64

(152)219I—(446)447

>•“O —' NS —i u- 34 . NO wLn 4^ Uio

#

03 J I L J 1n1Mission Oaks Blvd

1 1QPetit St|239(529)—*384(562)—163(120)—j

n t r -s159(78)-*174(78)—}

<2 to —ILn 4s.ho ^C* vjO'! —

“71 CO Us CD

coS w2 hO -1 VI

< XIOL

Sc PRO ECT SITECD V!42D

•5VI 5 c

<

65 Q4s, hous cr>Ln 4a,JO —cO OJO 4s,

CT>LO <-*U) '5§ *—(969)473

I—(59)62

Daily Dr*—(51)65(5)9

I—(26)32

>Q 03 US —iOi O' Ln

I L J I L Mission Oak BivdIPetit St [Dawson Pi

137(56)—*18(0)90(68)—}

t r n I r Ventura BlvdM N ML UJ ^;M Ct 4a.O 03

US US03 CO£3 LnS3 VI cr>

O

7 8 QhO US —cLn O O—1 CD Lnho Ln ClhO 4a. -cO US to

USg Ln S*—(236)247—(355)724|—(358)279

.£ LnC: to >to W 2

Ln —5

*—(78)60—(550)975

0J

Dav^s°°^J l L J L 6Pleasant Valley Rd Pleasant Valley Rd

208(199)—*385(563)—19(8) }

113(314)—*585(763)—n t r 5 X.04> cLn JO too>> us Lnui 2) CCD 4a. 4a

NSUs 4a.

ftcnU3 l 5o cn

Pleasant Valley Rd8 — 703

CL

03 LEGEND3USan oo ^-(XX)XX - (AM)PM Peak Hour Volumecr 03

c NOT TO SCALEOD33•*< Am ASSOCIATED

T RANSPORTATION

E NGINEERS

NJ FIGURE3O•> era EXISTING + PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES3K3 rec reho yo JH - ATE#19091c/i

Table 5Existing + Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Operations

AM Peak Hour

Existing Existing+Project

Intersection ChangeICU-LOS ICU-LOS Impact?

Lewis Rd./Adolfo Rd. 0.59-LOS A 0.59-LOS A 0.00 No

Flynn Rd./Adolfo Rd. 0.41-LOS A 0.41-LOS A 0.00 No

Dawson Dr./Petit St. 0.48-LOS A 0.49-LOS A 0.01 No

Lewis Rd./Dawson PI. 0.32-LOS A 0.32-LOS A 0.00 No

Pleasant Valley Rd./Dawson Dr. 0.47-LOS A 0.47-LOS A 0.00 No

Pleasant Valley Rd./Lewis Rd. 0.49-LOS A 0.49-LOS A 0.00 No

U.S. Highway 101NB Ramps/Mission Oaks. Blvd. 0.50-LOS A 0.50-LOS A 0.00 No

U.S. Highway 101 SB Ramps/Village at the Park 0,67-LOS B 0.67-LOS B 0.00 No

Table 6Existing + Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations

IPM Peak Hour

Existing Existing+Project


Lewis Rd./Adolfo Rd. 0.54-LOS A 0.54-LOS A 0.00 No

Flynn Rd./Adolfo Rd. 0.54-LOS A 0.54-LOS A 0.00 No



Pleasant Valley Rd./Dawson Dr. 0.62-LOS B 0.63-LOS B 0.01 No


U.S. Highway 101NB Ramps/Mission Oaks Blvd. 0.45-LOS A 0.46-LOS A 0.01 No

U.S. Highway 101 SB Ramps/Village at the Park 0.44-LOS A 0.44-LOS A 0.00 No

The data in Tables 5 and 6 show that the Project would not significantly impact any of theother study-area intersections based on City of Camarillo impact thresholds.

Mission Oaks Boulevard industrial ProjectTraffic Study


CUMULATIVE (EXISTING + APPROVED/PENDING PROJECTS) ANALYSIS

The City of Camarillo require that intersections be analyzed with the addition of trafficgenerated by projects which have been approved or are pending within the study-area thatcould impact the facilities. The Cumulative (Existing + Approved/Pending Projects) trafficvolumes were forecast for the study-area roadways and intersections assuming developmentof 18 approved and pending projects located within the City of Camarillo and unincorporatedVentura County. Trip generation estimates were developed forthe approved/pendingprojectsusing trip generation rates published in the ITE, Trip Generation, 10th Edition. Table 7summarizes the trip generation forthe approved/pending development projects.

Table 7Approved/Pending Development Projects Trip Generation

TripsAM

Peak HourPM

Land Use Peak HourJurisdiction SizeProject ADTNo.Wholesale LumberyardVentura County PL15-0014 164 16 161. 18.9 acres :

Organics ProcessingVentura County PL18-0081 17.2 acres 40 4 42.

Dog KennelVentura County PL18-0109 20 acres 50 5 53.Farmworker HousingSomis Ranch 360 unitsVentura County 2,635 166 2024.

10 units8,000 sq.ft.

CUP-307(2)CPD-236M(1)

ApartmentsRetail Commercial

673 5City of Camarillo 8 303025.City of Camarillo Condominiums 87 units 637 40 496. RPD-188

23 units6,100 sq.ft.

10 13ApartmentsRetail Commercial

168City of Camarillo CUP-330 6 232307.City of Camarillo RPD-189M(2) 96 unitsApartments 703 44 548.

City of Camarillo Senior Housing 281 unitsRPD-198 2,118 168 1669.Single Family ResidentialCity of Camarillo 2 units 2RPD-203 19 110.

Townhomes 4RPD-202CUP-391CUP-391

8 58 412 units

1,400 sq.ft.Apartments

Retail Commercial688 7

City of Camarillo 53 1 511.

3,000 sq.ft.City of Camarillo Convenience StoreCUP-381 188 1472,28712 .24,102 sq.ft.City of Camarillo CUP-364M(1) Brewery 2,704 0 23513.

Light Industrial 67,867 sq.ft.City of Camarillo IPD-23M(25) 43337 4814.3,600 sq.ft.City of Camarillo Dog KennelCUP-397 50 5 515.

Senior/Assisted Living 93 bedsCity of Camarillo 18 24RPD-200 24216.

3,693 sq.ft.City of Camarillo Moose LodgeCUP-398 50 0 3017.Groundwater Treatment 6,541 sq.ft.City of Camarillo 4 4CUP-394 3218.

Total Trips: 13,040 747 1,074



The data presented in Table 7 indicate thatthe approved and pendingprojects would generatea total of 13,040 average daily trips, 747 AM peak hour trips and 1,074 PM peak hour trips.The approved and pending projects' peak hour traffic volumes were distributed and assignedto the study-area roadways and intersections. The trip assignment for the approved andpending projects was developed based on the location of each project, approved trafficstudies, existing traffic patterns observed in the study-area as well as a general knowledge ofthe population,employmentand commercial centers in and surroundingthe study-area. Figure7 illustrates the Cumulative AM and PM peak traffic volumes.Cumulative Impacts

Intersections. Tables 8 and 9 present the Cumulative and Cumulative + Project AM and PMpeak hour intersection levels of service and identifiers impacts based on the City of Camarillothresholds. Figure 8 illustrates the AM and PM peak hour Cumulative + Project trafficvolumes.

Table 8Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Operations

AM Peak Hour

Cumulative Cum.+ Project


Lewis Rd./Adolfo Rd. 0.60-LOS A 0.61-LOS B 0.01 No

Flynn Rd./Adoifo Rd. 0.44-LOS A 0.44-LOS A 0.00 No



Pleasant Valley Rd./Dawson Dr. 0.55-LO5 A 0.55-LOS A 0.00 No


U.S. Highway 101NB Ramps/Mission Oaks Blvd. 0.51-LOS A 0.51-LOS A 0.00 No

U.S. Highway 101 SB Ramps/Village at the Park 0.71-LOSC 0.72-LOS C 0.01 No



3 2£D m

mn oco =3

21 5 SLn_i N j

_a

ui owO O C£__i 4 . Cr

OJ -fc.''J—1 LO

Lo Ln Ln

^S N3Lo -vj O'O Ln Ln

.£ c5.I *—(90)175

(315)495I—(180)180

*—(61)102(310)490

f—(85)80

£ o Li-CL CDvi J 1 L J I LCO lAdolfo Rd Adolfo RdO

40(65)—*350(610)35(40)—f

290(205)—*400(630)—70(270)—fo t rc

0 rCD< Ln fsJ

Ln O O'O UI w

CNLn Ln

—4 —i Ln03 Ln LD O29 NQ_NJ 4— O'-J CTO LOD

Q_cc/s

3 2 4Lo 4^-vi CO *v4-A —1 O-N LO—* LO£o

NJcr> -uLO o

COo> tnc 5(140)80—(160)230j—(450)455

>•"U - TO - U- CH-Ui UiONO

CD J IJ I LnI Mission Oaks Blvd

DPetit St|

1 t250(533)—*385(570)—165(135)—}n I r 189(104)—*

205(90)—y

£M -Ln O->CO Ln

a;CO LO —1

O LO Oto aS

m2 <o aOW Aso Ln £in O•vlZ> >

5 6a 2-L NJ^4 IDO^to CD4N LoO LO

•—Jl

N Ln A >O^Ln «

S *—(983)514

|—(85)80

Daily Dr*—(55)70(5)10

I—(30)35

in

Q VD UI JO —O Ln O

l L J I L Mission Oak BlvdLnIPetit St |Dawson PI

! r 140(60)—*20(0)—95(70) fit r Centura Blvda L.

O Ln95 CONJ o

LO sj —1

O LO Ot o S -Ln LO Ln

Ln Oo o

7 8 oNJ LO —»<y> LO *O O O .ato Ln 53NJ CO —1 -*Ln O Ln *—

LOLO §*—(250)260-—(400)760

I—(365)285

o LO „D ^ icr* NJ Qa a *- *—(90)80—(600)1025 Qawsov'J I L J L

Pleasant Valley Rd Pleasant Valiev Rd

230(220)—*410(600)25(15) }

150(350)—*610(800)—1 t r> CT> NJ hO

O Ln LnxS2

<S)

<s>O Ln A A

Ln hoO O

nPleasant Valley RdCD

8 - 7CDQ_—ICD LEGEND13in~oT1 oCD ^-(XX)XX - (AM)PM Peak Hour Volumecr CD

c NOT TO SCALEOCD13 Am ASSOCIATED

T RANSPORTATION

E NG1NEERS

FIGURENJ 1 3o era CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMESNJCDO

NJ Vzo JH - ATE#19091m

2CD ui

ui

2n 'I -o so Ui —4 N) —*CQ »/loj m >

U> NJ NJO Vl NJ

WOWO O CN=3Ln c

£*—(91)181—(315)497

^—(180)180*—(61)102-—(310)490f—(85)80

o js. _ic ~

Q_ Oj 4s. vj *—O W;bCD

"< 7TUl J I L J I L

lAdolfo Rd lAcolfo RdO40(65)—*350(613)— -35(40)—f

290(205)—*400(630)71(280)—y

c r rCD< -U Ul tu

Ul O O'^92O Ul w

O' osUl Ul

•—4 Ul£D woociS iQ_NJ -U ONJ NJ03 -*=3

Q_cUl

3 w—1 N OD N cDn -^ O J.—I ru

_i u_

SI Ul^ —4 4^ UJ

Ul oNi NJNJ 4*.Ul O

ccin035*—(140)80-—(162)230

p-(450)455

“0 inOO.

CD J I L J 1n[Mission Oaks Blvd

QPetit St 1260(534)—*387(570)175(137)—f

1 t r i ts199(106)—*

205(90)—}

20jSO U> —4 to —4

Nl dUl O

5 w u o1 o S S2 —4 NJ -U

<a -I <4003 UlNl Ul 42

3 oNl >

65 4iW Q— ^ O c00^ §

r* *-U 4 Q

sNj

*—(995)515

|—(85)80

SI W 4. >

5SiI! .2so ui to *—0 0) 0

*—(55)70(5)10

|—(30)35! L J ! Lci[ Petit St [ Dawson PI

140(60)—*f r i t r20(0) Ventura Blvd-fc. -fc.—4 Ul3 CONJ O

Ul NJ —4

O SO OloS -Ul SO Ul

95(70) j

Ul o

87 QNJ UJ —4

OS UJ —4

O O O* N X*NNJ Ul •—4

NJ CO —4

Os O Ul

U)jo SO 5*—(250)260-—(402)760I—(365)285

^ W V,d vo >Os NJ Q

^ o L *—(95)80—(600)1025

4J

Qavs'soi'J I L J L 6Pleasant Valley Rd Pleasant Valley Rd

231(220)—*411(600)—27(15) fit r 151(355)—*610(800)— v-D TO.

> cOs NJ NJNJ Ul UlOs S 95

£ui 5us 1 3o Ul 4S 4*.Ul NJO O

ooPleasant Valley Rd03

8 — 7(DQ_CD LEGENDZ3ui-aTi oCD ^-(XX)XX - (AM)PM Peak Hour Volumecr CD

C NOT TO SCALEOCDZ2*< Am ASSOCIATED

T RANSPORTATION

E NCINEERS

FIGURENJ =3 m\\o era CUMULATIVE + PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES=3NJ03O 03NJo JH - ATE#19091Ul

Table 9Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations

PM Peak Hour

Cumulative Cum.+Project

Change Impact?ICU-LOSIntersection ICU-LOS

0.57-LOS A 0.57-LOS A 0.00 NoLewis Rd./Adolfo Rd.0.57-LOS A 0.00 NoFlynn Rd./Adolfo Rd. 0.57-LOS A

0.46-LOS A 0.00 No0.46-LOS ADawson Dr./Petit St.0.45-LOS A 0.45-LOS A 0.00 NoLewis Rd./Dawson PI.0.71-LOS C 0.71-LOS C 0.00 NoPleasant Valley Rd./Dawson Dr.

0.52-LOS A 0.00 No0.52-LOS APleasant Valley Rd./Lewis Rd.0.42-LOS A 0.00 NoU.S. Highway 101NB Ramps/Mission Oaks Blvd. 0.42-LOS A

0.50-LOS A No0.50-LOS A 0.00U.S. Highway 101 SB Ramps/Village at the Park

The data in Tables 8 and 9 show that the Project traffic would not significantly impact thestudy-area intersection during the AM and PM peak hour periods based on City of Camarilloimpact thresholds.



STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND REFERENCES

Associated Transportation Engineers

Scott A. Schell, AICP, PTP, Principal PlannerDarryl F. Nelson, Senior Transportation PlannerJiho Ha, Transportation Engineer I

References

Circulation Element, General Plan, City of Camarillo, 2014.

Persons Contacted

Jason Samonte, City of Camarillo Public Works DepartmentMichelle D'anna, City of Camarillo Community Development Department

;

|

!



Appendix C C.pdf · # 2. r. oj. 1/5. project data: notes : ln ‘5 = o o. 1. all. lightingmust be...

Documents

Transcript of Appendix C C.pdf · # 2. r. oj. 1/5. project data: notes : ln ‘5 = o o. 1. all. lightingmust be...