214: Planets & Life PHYS 214thacker/teaching/214/lec/lecture6.pdf · Today ’ s Lecture Life in...
Transcript of 214: Planets & Life PHYS 214thacker/teaching/214/lec/lecture6.pdf · Today ’ s Lecture Life in...
Planets & Life
Planets & Life
PHYS 214
PHYS 214
Dr Rob Thacker
Dr Rob Thacker
Dept of Physics (308A)
Dept of Physics (308A)
thacker@
astro.queensu.ca
thacker@
astro.queensu.ca
Please start all class related emails with
Please start all class related emails with ““214:
214:””
Today
Today’’ s Lecture
s Lecture
��Life in Cosm
os: The
Life in Cosm
os: The Anthropic
AnthropicCosm
ological
Cosm
ological
Principle
Principle
��We
We ’’ll discuss a number of philosophical issues today
ll discuss a number of philosophical issues today
��(N
ext week we
(Next week we ’’ll start working from the book)
ll start working from the book)
If you want to make an apple pie from scratch,
you must first create the universe.
Carl Sagan
Preface
Preface
��Science has been phenomenally successful at explaining
Science has been phenomenally successful at explaining
the features of the observed Universe in the last 40 or
the features of the observed Universe in the last 40 or
so years
so years
��DNA
DNA
��Big Bang
Big Bang……
and so on
and so on……
��We now (tend to) believe that there is a fully scientific
We now (tend to) believe that there is a fully scientific
explanation for anything we observe
explanation for anything we observe ……
��Yet, as we
Yet, as we ’’ll see in this course, certain aspects of the
ll see in this course, certain aspects of the
Universe appear strongly at odds with the idea that
Universe appear strongly at odds with the idea that
humanity is
humanity is ““average
average ””
��Some of the ideas in this lecture m
ay seem totally crazy
Some of the ideas in this lecture m
ay seem totally crazy
––that
that’’ s O
K, some of them
s OK, some of them
areare
Ptolemaic Cosmology
Ptolemaic Cosmology
��This is a geocentric view of
This is a geocentric view of
the Universe
the Universe
��Planets, Sun, stars
Planets, Sun, stars etc.
etc.are all
are all
view
ed as revolving around
view
ed as revolving around
the Earth
the Earth
��Actually predicting orbits
Actually predicting orbits
was very difficult in this
was very difficult in this
model because it is
model because it is
obviously wrong
obviously wrong
��Nonetheless, its moderate
Nonetheless, its moderate
successes made it attractive
successes made it attractive
for hundreds of years
for hundreds of years
Earth at the center, the Moon
Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars,
Jupiter, Saturn and lastly
the fixed Stars
The Copernican Principle
The Copernican Principle
��Prior to the 16
Prior to the 16
ththcentury the philosophical
century the philosophical
view
of the Cosm
os was
view
of the Cosm
os was Ptolemaic
Ptolemaic
��Placing the Earth at the centre of the Universe
Placing the Earth at the centre of the Universe
also influenced philosophical thought about how
also influenced philosophical thought about how
special the Earth was
special the Earth was
��Nicolaus
NicolausCopernicus (1473
Copernicus (1473-- 1543) is credited advancing the idea
1543) is credited advancing the idea
that the Earth is
that the Earth is not special
not special
��This idea lead to him showing the motions of the planets could b
This idea lead to him showing the motions of the planets could be e
explained by a Solar System with the Sun at its center
explained by a Solar System with the Sun at its center
��The step lead to the
The step lead to the ““Copernican Revolution
Copernican Revolution””
��The same idea can be extended to Cosm
ology, and is partially
The same idea can be extended to Cosm
ology, and is partially
motivation for the Cosm
ological Principle
motivation for the Cosm
ological Principle
(Copernicus was a Catholic Cleric)
Mediocrity Principles
Mediocrity Principles
��The philosophy underlying the Copernican revolution
The philosophy underlying the Copernican revolution
can be extended
can be extended
��There is nothing special about the Human Race
There is nothing special about the Human Race
��There is nothing special about the Earth
There is nothing special about the Earth
��There is nothing special about the Sun
There is nothing special about the Sun
��There is nothing special about the Milky Way
There is nothing special about the Milky Way
��and so on
and so on……
��Most scientists like to adopt this stance
Most scientists like to adopt this stance
��Im
plying we aren
Implying we aren’’ t special means that we expect physical law
s t special means that we expect physical law
s
we derive to be typical of elsewhere
we derive to be typical of elsewhere
The fundamental constants of nature
The fundamental constants of nature
��There are many (unexplained) constants used in
There are many (unexplained) constants used in
the equations for the physical forces
the equations for the physical forces
��e.g.
e.g.GG, N
ewton
, New
ton’’ s gravitational constant, or the unit of
s gravitational constant, or the unit of
charge on the electron,
charge on the electron, ee
��If any of these values were changed
If any of these values were changed --by even a
by even a
small am
ount
small am
ount --stars would not form
stars would not form
��Since the form
ation of stars is a precursor to the
Since the form
ation of stars is a precursor to the
form
ation of life,
form
ation of life, is the Universe in fact tuned
is the Universe in fact tuned
to form life
to form life??
Are we, in fact, special in some way?
Are we, in fact, special in some way?
Selection effects
Selection effects
��Before drawing conclusions from any scientific process
Before drawing conclusions from any scientific process
we must always be aw
are of possible
we must always be aw
are of possible observational biases
observational biases
��Suppose a
Suppose a ratcatcher
ratcatcher
tells you that all rats are longer
tells you that all rats are longer
than six inches
than six inches……
��Your first reaction should be to check the size of his traps!
Your first reaction should be to check the size of his traps!
��Similarly, just because your highest probability of seeing
Similarly, just because your highest probability of seeing
an elephant is in a zoo
an elephant is in a zoo……
��Doesn
Doesn’’ t m
ean all elephants are in zoos
t mean all elephants are in zoos
��Or even that m
ost elephants are in zoos
Or even that m
ost elephants are in zoos
Suppose the fundamental constants
Suppose the fundamental constants
were slightly different
were slightly different
��If gravity was weaker, stars wouldn
If gravity was weaker, stars wouldn’’ t collapse as fast or
t collapse as fast or
get as hot
get as hot
��If electromagnetism was different matter might repel
If electromagnetism was different matter might repel
too strongly to form
stars
too strongly to form
stars
��If we can
If we can’’ t form
stars we can
t form
stars we can’’ t form
elements
t form
elements ““heavier
heavier””
than
than HeHe, such as
, such as O,Si,Al,Fe
O,Si,Al,Fethat m
ake up m
uch of the
that m
ake up m
uch of the
Earth
Earth
��Without the Earthlike planets
Without the Earthlike planets we can
we can’’ t form life as we know
t form life as we know
itit
��Thus if we change the constants
Thus if we change the constants we won
we won’’ t be here to see
t be here to see
them
them
What about the age of the Universe?
What about the age of the Universe?
��After we have form
ed
After we have form
ed H,He
H,Hefollowing the Big Bang the only
following the Big Bang the only
place hot enough left to form
heavy elements is the center of
place hot enough left to form
heavy elements is the center of
stars
stars
��HH
and
and HeHeare fused into progressively heavier elements (we
are fused into progressively heavier elements (we ’’ll ll
talk about this later in the course)
talk about this later in the course)
��The most m
assive stars die in supernova explosions that
The most m
assive stars die in supernova explosions that
distribute the heavy elements into the space between stars
distribute the heavy elements into the space between stars
��This m
aterial can later be used to form
planets
This m
aterial can later be used to form
planets
��Scientists estimate this has to take between 4
Scientists estimate this has to take between 4-- 8 billion years
8 billion years
��By this time the Universe has to be extrem
ely large
By this time the Universe has to be extrem
ely large
��Another selection effect!
Another selection effect!
A more biological perspective
A more biological perspective
��Aside from the
Aside from the
form
ation of stars,
form
ation of stars,
the chem
istry that
the chem
istry that
results from the
results from the
values of the
values of the
fundam
ental
fundam
ental
constants is
constants is
responsible for the
responsible for the
form
ation of DNA
form
ation of DNA
Speed of light
Newton’s Gravitational
Constant
Charge of the electron
Planck’s constant
So let
So let ’’s think about ourselves for a
s think about ourselves for a
second
second……
��We are a carbon
We are a carbon-- based
based lifeform
lifeform
that was
that was
produced via evolution
produced via evolution
��Living on an Earthlike planet
Living on an Earthlike planet
��Revolving around a yellow dwarf star
Revolving around a yellow dwarf star
��Revolving around the center of a spiral galaxy
Revolving around the center of a spiral galaxy
��Evolving in a Universe capable of form
ing
Evolving in a Universe capable of form
ing
structures like stars and galaxies
structures like stars and galaxies
��In a universe with roughly 10 H atoms for each
In a universe with roughly 10 H atoms for each
He
He
A pretty strong set of selection effects
The Weak
The Weak Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciple(WAP
Principle(WAP))
““ The observed values of all physical and
The observed values of all physical and
cosmological quantities are not equally
cosmological quantities are not equally
probable but they take on values restricted
probable but they take on values restricted
by the requirement that there exist sites
by the requirement that there exist sites
where
where carbon
carbon-- based life
based lifecan evolve and by
can evolve and by
the requirements that the Universe be old
the requirements that the Universe be old
enough for it to have already done so.
enough for it to have already done so. ””
Barrow & Tipler
An immediate consequence
An immediate consequence
��The possibility of biological evolution is strongly
The possibility of biological evolution is strongly
dependent upon the global structure of the
dependent upon the global structure of the
Universe
Universe
��This is really a restatement of the apple pie
This is really a restatement of the apple pie
statem
ent!
statem
ent!
��The existence of life may be no m
ore, but no
The existence of life may be no m
ore, but no
less, rem
arkable than the existence of the
less, rem
arkable than the existence of the
Universe
Universe
Common Sense
Common Sense
��At the end of the day, the Weak
At the end of the day, the Weak Anthropic
Anthropic
Principle is merely a statem
ent of common sense
Principle is merely a statem
ent of common sense
��““If things were different, we wouldn
If things were different, we wouldn’’ t be here to see
t be here to see
them
them
””
��This fact has frustrated some researchers, here is
This fact has frustrated some researchers, here is
a statem
ent from a fam
ous book on cosm
ology:
a statem
ent from a fam
ous book on cosm
ology:
““It is unclear to one of the authors how a concept as lame
It is unclear to one of the authors how a concept as lame
as the
as the ““anthropic
anthropicidea
idea””was ever elevated to the status of
was ever elevated to the status of
a principle.
a principle.””
Fun Frank Zappa Joke
Fun Frank Zappa Joke
““Some scientists say that the major building
Some scientists say that the major building
block of the universe is hydrogen because
block of the universe is hydrogen because
it's the most plentiful element, but my
it's the most plentiful element, but my
theory is that the universe is made out of
theory is that the universe is made out of
stupidity, because it is more plentiful than
stupidity, because it is more plentiful than
hydrogen
hydrogen
””
Explaining the values of the
Explaining the values of the
fundamental constants
fundamental constants
��One of the major goals of fundam
ental physics
One of the major goals of fundam
ental physics
is to explain the values held by these constants
is to explain the values held by these constants
��That said, no accepted scientific theory has been
That said, no accepted scientific theory has been
able to explain these values with any success
able to explain these values with any success
��In response to this, and the fact that the
In response to this, and the fact that the
form
ation of stars is so finely tuned, one
form
ation of stars is so finely tuned, one
cosm
ologist (Brandon Carter) has suggested that
cosm
ologist (Brandon Carter) has suggested that
““The Universe must be such as to admit the creation of
The Universe must be such as to admit the creation of
observers within it at some stage
observers within it at some stage ””
The Strong
The Strong Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciple(SAP
Principle(SAP))
““The Universe must have those properties
The Universe must have those properties
which allow life to develop within it at some
which allow life to develop within it at some
stage in its history
stage in its history””
Barrow & Tipler
Implications of the SAP
Implications of the SAP
��There are at least three possible interpretations of what
There are at least three possible interpretations of what
the SAP m
ight mean
the SAP m
ight mean
��The first is a classic design argument
The first is a classic design argument
��““ There exists one possible Universe 'designed' with the goal of
There exists one possible Universe 'designed' with the goal of
generating and sustaining 'observers.
generating and sustaining 'observers. ‘‘""
��This implies that the purpose of the Universe is to give
This implies that the purpose of the Universe is to give
rise to intelligent life, with the laws of nature set to
rise to intelligent life, with the laws of nature set to
ensure that life as we know it will emerge
ensure that life as we know it will emerge
��This is of course strongly counter to m
ost m
odes of
This is of course strongly counter to m
ost m
odes of
scientific thought and as a scientist you should really
scientific thought and as a scientist you should really
feel uncomfortable with this statement
feel uncomfortable with this statement
SAP Implications II
SAP Implications II
��““ O
bservers are necessary to bring the Universe into
Observers are necessary to bring the Universe into
being.
being.““
��This is an apparently crazy idea stemming from
This is an apparently crazy idea stemming from
quantum m
echanics
quantum m
echanics ––I won
I won’’ t discuss it further
t discuss it further
��““ A
n ensemble of other different universes is necessary for
An ensemble of other different universes is necessary for
the existence of our Universe.
the existence of our Universe.““
��Many different
Many different ““parallel
parallel ””Universes have to exist
Universes have to exist
to create our particular Universe
to create our particular Universe
Why so much interest in this idea?
Why so much interest in this idea?
��Scientists studying the Big Bang (such as Stephen
Scientists studying the Big Bang (such as Stephen
Haw
king) have a very hard time making sense of the
Haw
king) have a very hard time making sense of the
mathem
atics involved
mathem
atics involved
��The invocation of an
The invocation of an Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciple m
ay help to
Principle m
ay help to
simplify the math
simplify the math
��i.e. w
e only allow this range of numbers and not a larger one
i.e. w
e only allow this range of numbers and not a larger one
��Some theories associated with the Big Bang start with
Some theories associated with the Big Bang start with
as m
any as 11 dimensions and an
as m
any as 11 dimensions and an Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciple
Principle
seem
s to be the only way of throwing aw
ay all those
seem
s to be the only way of throwing aw
ay all those
useless dim
ensions and leaving us with the 4 we have
useless dim
ensions and leaving us with the 4 we have
Problems, problems
Problems, problems ……
��Design arguments seem to always be a last resort
Design arguments seem to always be a last resort
in science
in science
��When we do not understand
When we do not understand something,
something,a a
natural reaction is to suggest something must be
natural reaction is to suggest something must be
that way because of an underlying purpose
that way because of an underlying purpose
��This bears similarities to Intelligent Design
This bears similarities to Intelligent Design
ideas, although the
ideas, although the Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciples try to
Principles try to
strongly resist the idea of any
strongly resist the idea of any ““higher being
higher being””
Even more unusual
Even more unusual ……
��Before we finish I
Before we finish I’’ ll present two final
ll present two final Anthropic
Anthropic
Principles
Principles
��One is m
oderately interesting, the last one is an
One is m
oderately interesting, the last one is an
amusing poke at the whole concept
amusing poke at the whole concept
Final
Final Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciple (FAP)
Principle (FAP)
““ Intelligent information
Intelligent information-- processing must
processing must
come into existence in the Universe, and,
come into existence in the Universe, and,
once it comes into existence, it will never die
once it comes into existence, it will never die
out
out ””
Barrow & Tipler
Humour
Humour : The Completely
: The Completely Rediculous
Rediculous
Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciple (CRAP)
Principle (CRAP)
��The mathem
atician M
artin G
ardner quoted the last two
The mathem
atician M
artin G
ardner quoted the last two
lines of the book by Barrow &
lines of the book by Barrow & Tipler
Tipler
��““At the instant the
At the instant the Omega Point
Omega Pointis reached, life
is reached, life
will have gained control of
will have gained control ofall
all matter and forces not
matter and forces not
only in a single universe, but in all universes whose
only in a single universe, but in all universes whose
existence is logically possible; life will have spread
existence is logically possible; life will have spread
intointoall
all spatial regions in all universes which could
spatial regions in all universes which could
logically exist, and will have stored an infinite
logically exist, and will have stored an infinite
amount of information, including
amount of information, includingall
all bits of
bits of
knowledge which it is logically possible to know.
knowledge which it is logically possible to know.
And this is the end.
And this is the end. ””
Summary of lecture 6
Summary of lecture 6
��When conducting any scientific experiment you m
ust always be
When conducting any scientific experiment you m
ust always be
careful to avoid selection effects
careful to avoid selection effects
��The Weak
The Weak Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciple is merely the statem
ent that we
Principle is merely the statem
ent that we
see things the way they are because if they were any other way
see things the way they are because if they were any other way
we wouldn
we wouldn’’ t be here to see them
t be here to see them
��The Strong
The Strong Anthropic
AnthropicPrinciple can be interpreted as a design
Principle can be interpreted as a design
argument
argument
��It is usually a last resort when there appears to be no argument
It is usually a last resort when there appears to be no argumentfor why a
for why a
particular system
should be the way it is
particular system
should be the way it is
��Its value is strongly contested
Its value is strongly contested
��It is nonetheless am
azing that interpretation of the mathem
atics
It is nonetheless am
azing that interpretation of the mathem
atics
of the Big Bang can be influenced by the possibility of life
of the Big Bang can be influenced by the possibility of life
��The remaining
The remaining anthropic
anthropicprinciples are far more speculative and
principles are far more speculative and
of less significance
of less significance
Next lecture
Next lecture
��Stars
Stars