101 Innovations in scholarly communication - changing research workflows
-
Upload
hierohiero -
Category
Science
-
view
979 -
download
0
Transcript of 101 Innovations in scholarly communication - changing research workflows
(except logo’s)
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communicationchanging research workflows
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman
OpenCon webcast, December 11, 2015
@MsPhelps@jeroenbosman
2005
2010
Discovery
Analysis
WritingPublication
Out
reac
h
Assessm
ent
What people can use
DIY: Encounter problem? Code the solution!
2005
2010
Discovery
Analysis
WritingPublication
Out
reac
h
Assessm
ent
Or: use one of
the many tools
already out
there
Database: scholarly communication tools
http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list
Example research workflows: traditional to experimental
Open Science
y y y y yElsevier
Example research workflows:company silos / open science
Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests• replication & reproducibility• meaningful assessment• effective quality checks• credit where it is due• no fraud, plagiarism
• connected tools & platforms• no publ. size restrictions• null result publishing• speed of publication• (web)standards, IDs• semantic discovery• re-useability• versioning
open peer review •open (lab)notes •
plain language •open drafting •
open access •CC-0/BY •
good
efficient open
technical changes & standards
research governance
changes
economic & copyright
changes
researcher
funder
government
publisher
public
library
good
efficient open
Ongoing discussionsresearcher
funder
publisher
public
government library
Charters, manifestos and declarations
2003: Berlin Declaration
2012: San Francisco DORA
2015: Leiden Manifesto
2015: The Hague Declaration
2003: Berlin Declaration
2012: San Francisco DORA
2009: Right2Research
A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
What people do use
Survey: scholarly communication tools
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
Open untilFebruary 10
2016
Over 7,000 responses
Survey: scholarly communication tools
Survey: demographics (first 6571 results)
What is your research role?What discipline are you working in?
Survey results: Researcher profiles
others
MyScienceWork
ResearcherID
Academia.edu
Profile page at own institution
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
ResearchGate
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481)
Survey results: Altmetrics’ share
Do you support Open Access ?
Do you support Open Access ?
USA 86 %
Canada 90 %
Brazil 93 %
Russia 77 %
China 85 %
Japan 78 %
India 88 %
Australia 87 %
UK 95 % Germany 95 %
France 92 %
Do you support Open Access ?
Yes No I don't know
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Japan
Yes No I don't know
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
China
Do you support Open Access ?
USA 86 %
Canada 90 %
Brazil 93 %
Russia 77 %
China 85 %
Japan 78 %
India 88 %
Australia 87 %
UK 95 % Germany 95 %
France 92 %
Do you support Open Science ?
USA 79 %
Canada 79 %
Brazil 88 %
Russia 86 %
China 87 %
Japan 73 %
India 94 %
Australia 82 %
UK 84 % Germany 76 %
France 90 %
Make these data work for you
Do Asian postdocs look more to impact factors to select a journal to publish in than
their Latin American counterparts?
Make these data work for you
Is sharing ‘preprints’ gaining traction beyond the fields of astronomy, physics and math, and
if so, what platforms are used?
Make these data work for you
Which tools are used in multiple research phases, and are they leading tools
in any of these phases?
Compare yourself to your peer group
Call to action – help distribute our survey
English françaisEspañolРусский简体中文日本語العربية
Custom URL - get data from your institution
What people should use ?
collaborative online writing
using repositories for institutional
visibility
more open and post-publication
peer review
Importance of interoperability
101innovations.wordpress.com